liver OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report:
|
|
- Dorcas Caldwell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 waiting list... 4 deceased donation... 8 living donation... 9 transplant donor-recipient matching 14 outcomes pediatric transplant transplant center maps W. R. Kim 1,2, J. R. Lake 1,3, J. M. Smith 1,4, M. A. Skeans 1, D. P. Schladt 1, E. B. Edwards 5,6, A. M. Harper 5,6, J. L. Wainright 5,6, J. J. Snyder 1,7, A. K. Israni 1,7,8, B. L. Kasiske 1,8 1 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 2 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 3 Liver Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 4 Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 5 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Richmond, VA 6 United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 7 Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 8 Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report: ABSTRACT During 13,,479 adult candidates were added to the transplant waiting list, compared with,185 in 12; 5921 transplants were performed, and 211 of the transplanted organs were from living donors. As of December 31, 13, 15,27 candidates were registered on the waiting list, including 12,47 in active status. The most significant change in allocation policy affecting waitlist trends in 13 was the Share 35 policy, whereby organs from an entire region are available to candidates with model for end-stage disease scores of 35 or higher. Median waiting time for such candidates decreased dramatically, from 14. months in 12 to 1.4 months in 13, but the effect on waitlist mortality is unknown. The number of new active pediatric candidates added to the transplant waiting list increased to 693 in 13. Transplant rates were highest for candidates aged younger than 1 year (275.6 per waitlist years) and lowest for candidates aged 11 to 17 years (97. per waitlist years). Five-year graft survival was 71.7% for recipients aged younger than 1 year, 74.9% for ages 1 to 5 years, 78.9% ages 6 to years, and 77.4% for ages 11 to 17 years. KEY WORDS Liver transplant, model for end-stage disease, waiting list. We are still waiting for the call that they have a for our 9 year old daughter. We jump every time the phone rings. Robin, mother
2 2 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report Adult Liver Transplant Introduction In 13, 5921 transplants were performed in adults; 57 organs were from deceased donors and 211 were from living donors (Figure LI 4.5). In the US, 139 centers performed at least one adult transplant. As of December 31, 13, 15,27 candidates were registered on the waiting list, including 12,47 in active status (Figure LI 1.3). Waitlist mortality remained a concern; 1767 patients died while waiting for a transplant and another 1223 were removed from the list due to being too sick to undergo transplant (Figure LI 1.7). Early data after implementation of the so-called Share 35 policy suggest that waiting time for patients with high model for end-stage disease (MELD) scores was reduced dramatically (Figure LI 1.9), although waitlist mortality did not change appreciably (Figure LI 1.). As of June 3, 13, more than 59, adults were living with a functioning graft (Figure LI 6.6). Waiting List During 13,,479 candidates were added to the transplant waiting list (Figure LI 1.7), compared with,185 in 12. The number of active waitlist candidates on December 31, 13, was 12,47, compared with 12,442 one year before (Figure LI 1.3). The number of candidates on the active list has remained stable over time (Figure LI 1.1). The most significant change in allocation policy affecting waitlist trends in 13 was the Share 35 policy, whereby organs from an entire region are available to candidates with MELD scores of 35 or higher. Median waiting time for candidates with MELD scores of 35 or higher decreased dramatically, from 14. months in 12 to 1.4 months in 13 (Figure LI 1.9). Waiting times for status 1A/1B candidates did not change appreciably. The extent to which the shortened waiting time for candidates with high MELD scores will translate to reduced waitlist mortality remains to be determined. Donation/Transplant Over the past several years, deceased donation rates, rates of s recovered for transplant and not transplanted, and use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) s have not changed dramatically (Figures LI 2.1 to LI 2.5). Similarly, numbers of living donor transplants and donor outcomes after the procedure have remained stable (Figures LI 3.1 to LI 3.). Data on recipients show a continued trend toward older ages; 15.% of all adult recipients in 13 were aged 65 years or older (Figure LI 4.2). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remained the most common single diagnosis, followed by malignancies, some of which likely also represent HCV (Figure LI 4.2). Geographic disparity in the median MELD score and the gap between laboratory and allocation MELD scores at the time of transplant continued (Figures LI 4.8 and LI 4.9). The proportion of multi-organ transplants, particularly simultaneous and kidney transplants, continued to increase; the proportion of simultaneous and kidney transplants rose from 6.7% in to 7.8% in 12 and 8.1% in 13 (Figure LI 4.5). Shorter waiting times for high MELD candidates may potentially reduce the need for these transplants by decreasing the frequency of prolonged hepatorenal syndrome and acute kidney injury; however, the observation period under the Share 35 rule in 13 was not long enough to show an impact on the national trend. Outcomes Despite progressive escalation in the severity of end-stage disease, graft survival trends are encouraging (Figures LI 6.1 and LI 6.2). Pretransplant disease severity affects immediate postoperative survival, but both 3- and 9-day graft survival for all deceased donor s remained robust. Survival after living donor and DCD transplant also remained favorable (Figures LI 6.1 and LI 6.3). Regarding primary diagnosis, HCV recipients continued to experience the poorest graft survival, often related to recurrent hepatitis C (Figure LI 6.4). Hopefully, new antiviral agents introduced in late 13 will reduce late graft failure, a trend that will be monitored closely. Overall, as of June 3, 13, 59,5 transplant recipients were alive with a functioning graft, with many more pediatric recipients reaching adulthood each year (Figure LI 6.6). Pediatric Transplant Waiting List In 13, the number of new active candidates added to the pediatric transplant waiting list increased to 693; very few candidates were added as inactive (Figure LI 7.1). The number of prevalent candidates (on the list on December 31 of the given year) continued to decline, and most (66.9%) were listed as active. The age distribution of waitlist candidates has remained remarkably similar over the past decade. In 13, 19.8% of candidates were aged younger than 1 year, 31.3% were aged 1 to 5 years, 14.1% were aged 6 to years, and 34.8% were aged 11 to 17 years (Figure LI 7.2). White candidates represented the largest racial/ethnic group on the waiting list in 13 (53.8%) followed by Hispanic (24.2%), black (13.7%), and Asian candidates (5.7%). Most (63.8%) candidates had been waiting for less than 1 year, 9.6% for 1 to less than 2 years, 9.2% for 2 to less than 4 years, and 17.4% for 4 or more years. In 13, 25.1% of candidates were at status 1A/1B, 11.% had MELD/pediatric end-stage disease
3 3 (PELD) scores of less than 15, 22.3% had MELD/PELD scores of 15 to 29, and 19.% had MELD/PELD score of 3 or higher. Comparing waitlist candidates from 3 to 13, a higher proportion were Hispanic in 13 (17.% vs. 22.3%), and a higher proportion waited for less than 1 year (31.1% vs. 42.4%) (Figure LI 7.3). Interestingly, the proportion of candidates awaiting retransplant decreased from 17.5% in 3 to 7.7% in 13. Among candidates removed from the waiting list in 13, 7.4% received a deceased donor, 5.9% received a living donor, 4.8% died, 12.1% were removed from the list because their condition improved, and 2.1% were considered too sick to undergo transplant (Figure LI 7.4). Approximately 67% of candidates newly listed in underwent deceased donor transplant within 3 years, 9.% underwent living donor transplant, 5.4% died, 11.9% were removed from the list, and 7.1% were still waiting (Figure LI 7.5). In 13, the rate of deceased donor transplant among active pediatric candidates was 14.2 per active waitlist years (Figure LI 7.6). Rates were highest for candidates aged younger than 1 year (275.6 per active waitlist years) and lowest for candidates aged 11 years or older (97. per active waitlist years). Of note, transplant rates have been steadily increasing for candidates aged younger than 1 year. Pretransplant mortality has decreased for all age groups, to 6. deaths per waitlist years in (Figure LI 7.7). The pretransplant mortality rate was highest for candidates aged younger than 1 year, at 26.4 deaths per waitlist years in (Figure LI 7.7). Transplant The number of deceased donor transplants peaked at 542 in 8 and was 493 in 13 (Figure LI 7.8). The number of living donor transplants decreased from a peak of 1 in to 41 in 13 with most (7.7%) from closely related donors (Figure LI 7.9). Over the past decade of pediatric transplant, recipient age, sex, and racial/ethnic distributions have changed little (Figure LI 7.). Cholestatic disease remained the leading cause of failure (45.6%). In 11-13, 9.2% of transplant recipients had undergone previous transplant, a decrease from almost 14% a decade earlier. Insurance coverage appears to be changing; the percentage of recipients with private insurance decreased from 53.3% to 44.3%, and Medicaid coverage increased. In 11-13, 38.5% of recipients waited less than 31 days for transplant, and 14.9% waited 31 to 6 days, similar to 1-3. Almost 6% of transplant recipients were not hospitalized before transplant. Regarding medical urgency status, 34.3% of recipients underwent transplant as status 1A/1B, and 15.2% had MELD/PELD scores of 35 or higher. The most common scores at the time of transplant were 15 to 29 (25.%). Types of transplant procedures in pediatric recipients changed little over the past decade; 64.% of patients received a whole in 11-13, 19.7% received a partial, and 16.2% received a split. The proportion of living donors declined from 14.9% in 1-3 to 9.5% in ABOincompatible transplant occurred in 2.9% of recipients in 11-13, similar to the earlier era. Immunosuppression and Outcomes In 13, 22.7% of pediatric recipients received interleukin-2 receptor antagonists for induction therapy, 12.3% received a T-cell depleting agent, and 66.% reported no induction (Figure LI 7.12). The most commonly used initial immunosuppression agents included tacrolimus (96.2%), steroids (84.5%), and mycophenolate mofetil (38.%). Use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors at the time of transplant was minimal (1.6%), but increased to 5.1% at 1 year posttransplant. At 1 year posttransplant, 52.9% of recipients were receiving steroids. Graft survival continued to improve over the past decade among recipients of deceased donor and living donor s. Graft survival was 92.3% at 3 days for deceased donor transplants performed in 13, 89.3% at 1 year for transplants performed in 12, 84.6% at 3 years for transplants performed in, 78.1% at 5 years for transplants performed in 8, and 68.4% at years for transplants performed in 3 (Figure LI 7.13). Graft survival was 98.5% at 3 days for living donor transplants performed in 13, 93.1% at 1 year for transplants performed in 11-12, 85.4% at 3 years for transplants performed in 9-, 85.7% at 5 years for transplants performed in 7-8, and 67.5% at years for transplants performed in 1-2 (Figure LI 7.14). By age, 5-year graft survival was 71.7% for recipients aged younger than 1 year, 74.9% for ages 1 to 5 years, 78.9% ages 6 to years, and 77.4% for ages 11 to 17 years (Figure LI 7.16). Five-year graft survival was lowest, 6.%, for recipients with HCV as cause of disease. Five-year graft survival was 76.4% for recipients of a first transplant, compared with 64.5% for retransplant recipients. The incidence of acute rejection was remarkably similar for all age groups and lowest for recipients aged younger than 1 year. Of recipients in 7 to 11, approximately 18% experienced acute rejection by 6 months posttransplant, 27% to 31% by 12 months, and 29% to 39% by 24 months (Figure LI 7.15); 13.5% died within 5 years of transplant (Figure LI 7.17), and the leading cause of death was infection at 1 year and 5 years posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was 4.6% at 5 years posttransplant for recipients who were negative for Epstein-Barr virus and 3.4% for those who were positive (Figure LI 7.11). data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
4 4 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report waitinglist New patients Patients on list on Dec 31 each year Patients (in thousands) 15 5 Active Inactive Patients (in thousands) 15 5 Active Inactive LI 1.1 Adults waiting for transplant A new patient is one who first joined the list during the given year, without having been listed in a previous year. Previously listed candidates who underwent transplant and subsequently relisted are considered new. Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Concurrently listed candidates who are active at any program are considered active; those who are inactive at all programs are considered inactive. LI 1.2 Distribution of adults waiting for transplant Candidates waiting for transplant any time in the given year. Candidates listed concurrently at multiple centers are counted once. Age is determined at the later of listing date or January 1 of the given year. Time on the waiting list is determined at the earlier of December 31 or removal from the waiting list. Medical urgency status is the most severe during the year. Active and inactive patients are included. HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.
5 5 waitinglist 3 13 N % N % Age , , , , , , Sex Female 6, , Male 9, , Race White 11, , Black 1, , Hispanic 2, , Asian Other/unknown Citizenship US citizen 15, , Non-citizen resident Non-citizen non-resident Other/unknown Primary diagnosis Acute hepatic necrosis HCV 4, , Alcoholic disease 3, , Cholestatic disease 1, , Malignancy , Other/unk. 4, , Liver tx history First transplant 14, , Retransplant Blood type A 5, , B 1, ,634.9 AB O 7, , Waiting time < 1 year 4, , < 2 years 2, , < 3 years 2, , < 4 years 1, , < 5 years 1, years 2, , Medical urgency Status 1/1A/1B MELD MELD MELD , , MELD < 15 9, , Inactive 3, , HCC exception Yes No 15, , Multi-organ Liver alone 15, , Liver-kidney Liver-pancreas-intestine Liver-heart Other candidates 15, ,27. LI 1.3 Characteristics of adults on the transplant waiting list on December 31, 3, and December 31, 13 Patients waiting for transplant on December 31, 3, and December 31, 13, regardless of first listing date; active/inactive status is on this date, and multiple listings are not counted. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
6 6 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report waitinglist Transplants per wait-list years Age Transplants per wait-list years Sex and HCC exception status 8 Male, HCC Female, HCC 6 Male, Not HCC Female, Not HCC LI 1.4 Deceased donor transplant rates among active adult waitlist candidates Transplant rates are computed as the number of deceased donor transplants per patient-years of active waiting in a given year. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) candidates have active Stage 2 exception points (per OPTN policy 9.3.G) in the given year. 4 Median MELD at transplant No data Rate LI 1.5 Deceased donor transplant rates per waitlist years among active adult candidates, by DSA, Left panel: Transplant rates by DSA of the listing center, limited to candidates with active time on the waiting list in 12 and 13; deceased donor transplants only. Maximum time per listing is 2 years. Candidates listed concurrently in a single DSA are counted separately. Right panel: Adult deceased donor transplants performed in 12 and Patients at start of year 15,283 15,329 15,116 Patients added during year,369,185,479 Patients removed during year,34,389,594 Patients at end of year 15,348 15,125 15,1 No data Removal reason Deceased donor transplant 5,537 5,463 5,654 Living donor transplant Patient died 1,745 1,76 1,767 Patient refused transplant Improved, tx not needed Too sick for transplant 1,81 1,178 1,223 Other 1,121 1,47 1,72 LI 1.6 age of adult waitlisted candidates who underwent deceased donor transplant within 5 years, by DSA, 8 Candidates listed concurrently in a single DSA are counted once in that DSA; candidates listed in multiple DSAs are counted separately per DSA. LI 1.7 Liver transplant waitlist activity among adults Candidates concurrently listed at more than one center are counted once, from the time of earliest listing to the time of latest removal. Candidates who are listed, undergo transplant, and are relisted are counted more than once. Candidates are not considered to be on the list on the day they are removed; counts on January 1 may differ from counts on December 31 of the prior year. Candidates listed for multi-organ transplants are included.
7 7 waitinglist Median months to transplant MELD MELD 35+ Status 1A/1B LI 1.8 Three-year outcomes for adults waiting for transplant, new listings in Adults waiting for any transplant and first listed in. Candidates concurrently listed at more than one center are counted once, from the time of earliest listing to the time of latest removal. DD, deceased donor; LD, living donor of listing LI 1.9 Median months to transplant for waitlisted adults, by medical urgency at listing Observations censored at earliest of December 31, 13, transfer to another center, or removal from waiting list due to improved condition; otherwise, candidates contribute waiting time until deceased donor transplant. Kaplan-Meier competing risks methods used to estimate time to transplant. Analysis performed per candidate not per listing. If an estimate is not plotted, 5% of the cohort listed in that year had not undergone transplant by the censoring date. Only the first transplant is counted. 5 Age 5 Race Deaths per wait-list years Deaths per wait-list years 4 3 White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Deaths per wait-list years Primary diagnosis 5 Acute hepatic necrosis HCV 4 Alcoholic disease Cholestatic disease 3 Malignancy Other/unknown Deaths per wait-list years First medical urgency in given year Status 1A MELD< 15 MELD MELD 35+ Inactive LI 1. Pretransplant mortality rates among adults waitlisted for transplant Mortality rates are computed as the number of deaths per patient-years of waiting in the given year. Patients concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Deaths after removal from the waiting list are not counted. Rates by status are calculated as the number of transplants for a given status divided by total waiting time in the year at that status. Age is determined at the later of listing date or January 1 of the given year. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
8 8 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report deceaseddonation 4 Age 4 Race Donations per 1, deaths 3 < LI 2.1 Deceased donor donation rates Donations per 1, deaths 3 White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Numerator: Deceased donors aged younger than 75 years with s recovered for transplant. Denominator: US deaths per year, age younger than 75 years. Death data available only through 11. (Death data available at No data LI 2.2 Deceased donor donation rates (per deaths), by state, 9-11 Numerator: Deceased donors residing in the 5 states whose s were recovered for transplant from 9 through 11. Denominator: US deaths, all ages, by state from 9 through 11 (death data available at cdc.gov/nchs/products/nvsr.htm). Age 4 3 < Sex Male Female Race White Black Other/unknown DCD status DCD DBD HCV HCV positive HCV negative HCV status unknown LI 2.3 Rates of organs recovered for transplant and not transplanted ages of s not transplanted out of all s recovered for transplant. HCV, hepatitis C virus Anoxia Cerebrovascular/stroke Head trauma CNS tumor Other LI 2.4 DCD donors Deceased donors whose s were recovered for transplant LI 2.5 Cause of death among deceased donors Deceased donors whose s were transplanted. CNS, central nervous system.
9 9 livingdonation Transplants 4 3 Related Distantly related Spouse/partner Unrelated directed Other unrelated LI 3.1 Liver transplants from living donors, by donor relation Numbers of living donor donations, excluding domino s; characteristics recorded on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Donations per million population Age Sex LI 3.2 Living donor donation rates Male Female Race White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Number of living donors whose s were recovered for transplant each year, excluding domino donors. Denominator: US population aged 7 years or younger (population data downloaded from cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/bridged_race.htm) LI 3.3 Living donor transplant graft type As reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. LI 3.4 Rehospitalization in the first 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year among living donors, 8-12 Cumulative hospital readmission. The 6-week time point is recorded at the earliest of discharge or 6 weeks after donation. Domino donors excluded. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
10 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report livingdonation Type of biliary complication N Per Thousand 15 5 LI 3.5 Biliary complications among living donors, Clavien Grade Complications reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Type of complication is shown for all living donors, Clavien Grade 1, bilious Jackson Pratt drainage more than days; Clavien Grade 2, interventional procedure (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, percutaneous drainage, etc.); Clavien Grade 3, surgical intervention. Domino donors excluded. LI 3.6 Vascular complications requiring intervention among living donors, 9-13 Complications reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Domino donors excluded. LI 3.7 Other complications requiring intervention among living donors, 9-13 Complications reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Domino donors excluded. LI 3.8 Re-operation among living donors, 9-13 Complications reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Domino donors excluded < 25 kg/m 2 25-< 3 3-< 35 ³ 35 Unknown LI 3.9 BMI among living donors Donor height and weight reported on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. Domino donors excluded. Days after donation Cause Suicide 1 Accident/homicide Medical 2 Cancer Unknown LI 3. Living donor deaths, 9-13 Living donors, excluding domino s. Deaths as reported to OPTN or the Social Security Administration. Donation-related deaths are included in the Medical category.
11 11 transplant 5 Age 4 5 Sex 4 Transplants 3 < Transplants 3 Male Female Transplants Deceased donor Living donor Transplants Race White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Transplants Primary diagnosis 5 Acute hepatic necrosis 4 HCV Alcoholic disease Cholestatic disease 3 Malignancy Other/unknown LI 4.1 Total transplants transplant recipients, including adult and pediatric, retransplant, and multi-organ recipients LI 4.2 Liver transplants transplant recipients, including adult and pediatric, retransplant, and multi-organ recipients. HCV, hepatitis C virus LI 4.3 Use of DCD s among adult recipients, by recipient age ages of deceased donor transplants from DCD donors. No data LI 4.4 age of adult DCD transplants by DSA, age of deceased donor transplants from DCD donors, by DSA of the transplanting center. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
12 12 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report transplant 3 13 N % N % Age , , , Sex Female 1, , 34.1 Male 3, , Race White 3, , Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Primary diagnosis Acute hepatic necrosis HCV 1, , Alcoholic disease , Cholestatic disease Malignancy , Other/unknown 1, , Blood type A 1, , B AB O 2, , Waiting time < 31 days 1, , days days < 6 months < 12 months < 2 years < 3 years years Unknown BMI (kg/m 2 ) < < 25 1, , < 28 1, , < < 35 1, , Unknown Medical condition Hospitalized: ICU Hospitalized: not ICU ,4.3 Not hospitalized 3, , Unknown Medical urgency Status 1/1A MELD , MELD MELD , , MELD < Other/unknown Insurance Private 3, , Medicare , Medicaid Other/unknown Procedure type Whole 4, , Partial Split Multi-organ transplant Liver only 4, , Liver-kidney Other Donor type Deceased 4, , Living On life support Diabetes 1, , Portal vein thrombosis Incident tumor found at tx recipients 5,127. 5,921. LI 4.5 Characteristics of adult transplant recipients, 3 and 13 Adult transplant recipients, including retransplants.
13 13 transplant Induction agents Calcineurin inhibitor Anti-metabolite mtor inhibitors Steroids IL2-RA T-cell depleting None Cyclosporine Tacrolimus LI 4.6 Immunosuppression in adult transplant recipients Azathioprine Mycophenolate At transplant 1 year posttransplant At transplant 1 year posttransplant One-year posttransplantdata arelimited topatients alivewith graft function at1 yearposttransplant. Mycophenolateincludes mycophenolatemofetil andmycophenolate sodium. IL2-RA, interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; mtor, mammalian target of rapamycin. % 1yr % 2-3yr Medication post-tx Medication post-tx Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim 45.7 Oxycodone 53.8 Mycophenolate 43.5 Hydrocodone 41.6 Oxycodone 39.2 Mycophenolate 35.9 Prednisone 36.7 Prednisone 32.8 Valganciclovir 31.8 Amlodipine Besylate 3.2 Hydrocodone 29.2 Amoxicillin 25.3 Furosemide 28.3 Omeprazole 25.3 Ursodiol 24.2 Metoprolol Tartrate 22.4 Metoprolol Tartrate 21.9 Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim.8 Omeprazole.8 Furosemide.5 Amlodipine Besylate.7 Ursodiol 18.4 Magnesium Oxide 19.4 Zolpidem Tartrate 17.8 Nystatin 19. Azithromycin 17.6 Amoxicillin 17.1 Ciprofloxacin 17.5 LI 4.7 Top 15 medications filled by adult transplant recipients, 9 Adult transplant recipients, 9, who were matched to the IMS Health pharmacy claims database and had at least one medication filled during year 1 or year 2 or 3 posttransplant. No data No data LI 4.8 Median MELD scores for adult deceased donor recipients, by DSA, 13 Deceased donor transplants. DSA of transplant center location. Status 1A and 1B and inactive status excluded; allocation MELD score used. LI 4.9 Differences in lab MELD and allocation MELD scores among transplant recipients, 13 Deceased donor transplants. DSA of transplant center location. Status 1A and 1B and inactive status excluded. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
14 14 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report donor-recipientmatching Unk. HLA mismatches LI 5.1 Total HLA A, B, and DR mismatches among adult deceased donor -kidney transplant recipients Donor and recipient antigen matching is based on OPTN antigen values and split equivalences policy as of 13. Limited to deceased donor -kidney transplants only. Recipient Recipient + Recipient unk. Donor D D+ D unk. D D+ D unk. D D+ D unk. CMV Deceased Living EBV Deceased Living HB core Deceased Living HB surface antigen Deceased Living HCV Deceased Living HIV Deceased Living LI 5.2 Adult donor-recipient serology matching, 9-13 Donor serology is reported on the OPTN Donor Registration Form and recipient serology on the OPTN Transplant Recipient Registration Form. Any evidence for a positive serology indicates positive for that serology. If all fields are unknown, incomplete, or pending, the person is categorized as "unknown'' for that serology; otherwise, serology is assumed negative. CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; HB, hepatitis B; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
15 15 outcomes deceased donors Living donors DCD day 1-year 3-year 5-year -year LI 6.1 Graft failure within the first 9 days posttransplant among adult transplant recipients -cause graft failure is identified from multiple data sources, including the OPTN Transplant Recipient Registration Form, the OPTN Transplant Recipient Follow-up Form, and death dates from the Social Security Administration. Transplants after September 3, 13, are excluded due to insufficient follow-up LI 6.2 Graft failure among adult transplant recipients: deceased donor adult recipients of deceased donor s, including multi-organ transplants. Patients are followed until the earliest of retransplant, death, or December 31, 13. Estimates computed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and race. recipients month 1-year 3-year 5-year -year 6-month failure by lobe Right lobe Other lobe LI 6.3 Graft failure among adult transplant recipients: living donor adult recipients of living donor s, including multi-organ transplants. Patients are followed until the earliest of retransplant, death, or December 31, 13. Estimates computed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and race. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
16 16 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report outcomes Age DCD DBD DCD Primary diagnosis AHN HCV ALD Chol. disease Malignancy Other/unknown HCC HCC non-hcc Medical urgency Status 1A MELD ³ 35 MELD 3-34 MELD MELD < Retransplant 1st transplant Retransplant LI 6.4 Graft survival among adult transplant recipients, 8: deceased donors Graft survival estimated using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is stage T2. AHN, acute hepatic necrosis; ALD, alcoholic disease; Chol. disease, cholestatic disease. Primary diagnosis AHN HCV ALD Chol. disease Malignancy Other/unknown Medical urgency Status 1A or MELD > MELD LI 6.5 Graft survival among adult transplant recipients, 8: living donors Graft survival estimated using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. AHN, acute hepatic necrosis; ALD, alcoholic disease; Chol. disease, cholestatic disease.
17 17 outcomes Patients (in thousands) < EBV- EBV+ EBV Unknown LI 6.6 Recipients alive with a functioning graft on June 3 of the year, by age at transplant Recipients are assumed to be alive with function unless a death or graft failure is recorded. A recipient may experience a graft failure and be removed from the cohort, undergo retransplant, and reenter the cohort LI 6.7 Incidence of first acute rejection among adult transplant recipients, by age, 7-11 Acute rejection is defined as a record of acute or hyperacute rejection, or a record on the OPTN Transplant Recipient Registration or Transplant Recipient Follow-up Form of an anti-rejection drug being administered. Only the first rejection event is counted. Cumulative incidence is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier competing risk method LI 6.8 Incidence of PTLD among adult transplant recipients, by recipient EBV status at transplant, 7-11 Cumulative incidence is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier competing risk method. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is identified as a reported complication or cause of death on the OPTN Transplant Recipient Followup Form or the Posttransplant Malignancy Form as polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD, or Hodgkin disease. Only the earliest date of PTLD diagnosis is considered. EBV, Epstein-Barr virus. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
18 18 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report outcomes Rate per Cancer site Observed, PY Lower CI Upper CI Lip Mouth, tongue, other oral cavity and pharynx Salivary gland Nasopharynx Oropharynx including tonsil Esophagus Stomach Small intestine Colorectum Anus, anal canal and anorectum Liver Other biliary Pancreas Larynx Lung and bronchus Soft tissue including heart Melanoma of the skin Other non-epithelial skin Breast Cervix uteri Corpus uteri Ovary Vagina and other female genital organs Vulva Prostate Testis Penis and other male genital organs Urinary bladder, ureter, and other urinary organs Kidney Eye and orbit Brain, cranial nerves, and other nervous system Thyroid Hodgkin lymphoma Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Myeloma Acute lymphocytic leukemia Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Acute myeloid leukemia Acute monocytic leukemia Chronic myeloid leukemia Mesothelioma Kaposi sarcoma Miscellaneous Tumors with poorly specified morphology LI 6.9 Posttransplant cancer among transplant recipients, -9 Reported cancer data linked to OPTN data from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, Florida, and Utah state cancer registries. Reported cancers are counted once per type per person posttransplant. Denominator: person-years posttransplant for residents of the above states who underwenttransplant-9. Sex-specific denominators areusedtocomputeratesforsex-specific cancers.
19 19 pediatrictransplant Patients New patients Active Inactive Patients Patients on list on Dec 31 each year Active Inactive LI 7.1 Pediatric candidates waiting for transplant A new patient is one who first joined the list during the given year, without having been listed in a previous year. Previously listed candidates who underwent transplant and were subsequently relisted are considered new. Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Concurrently listed candidates who are active at any program are considered active; those who are inactive at all programs are considered inactive. LI 7.2 Distribution of pediatric candidates waiting for transplant Candidates waiting for transplant any time in the given year. Candidates listed concurrently at multiple centers are counted once. Age is determined at the later of listing date or January 1 of the given year. Pediatric candidates aged 12 to 17 years can be assigned MELD or PELD scores. Time on the waiting list is determined at the earlier of December 31 or removal from the waiting list. Medical urgency status is the most severe during the year. Active and inactive patients are included. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
20 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report pediatrictransplant 3 13 N % N % Age < Sex Female Male Race White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Citizenship US citizen 1, Non-citizen resident Non-citizen non-resident Other/unknown Liver tx history First transplant Retransplant Blood type A B AB O Waiting time < 1 year < 2 years < 3 years < 4 years < 5 years years Medical urgency Status 1/1A/1B MELD MELD MELD MELD < Inactive Multi-organ Liver alone Liver-kidney Liver-pancreas-intestine Liver-heart Other candidates 1, LI 7.3 Characteristics of pediatric candidates on the transplant waiting list on December 31, 3, and December 31, 13 Candidates waiting for transplant on December 31, 3, and December 31, 13, regardless of first listing date; active/inactive status is on this date, and multiple listings are not counted. Pediatric candidates aged 12 to 17 years can be assigned MELD or PELD scores Patients at start of year Patients added during year Patients removed during year Patients at end of year Removal reason Deceased donor transplant Living donor transplant Patient died Patient refused transplant Improved, tx not needed Too sick for transplant Other LI 7.4 Liver transplant waitlist activity among pediatric candidates Candidates concurrently listed at more than one center are counted once, from the time of earliest listing to the time of latest removal. Candidates who are listed, undergo transplant, and are relisted are counted more than once. Candidates are not considered to be on the list on the day they are removed; counts on January 1 may differ from counts on December 31 of the prior year. Candidates listed for multi-organ transplants are included. LI 7.5 Three-year outcomes for pediatric candidates waiting for transplant among new listings, Candidates waiting for any transplant and first listed in. Candidates concurrently listed at more than one center are counted once, from the time of earliest listing to the time of latest removal. DD, deceased donor; LD living donor.
21 21 pediatrictransplant Transplants per wait-list years 3 Age < Transplants per wait-list years Medical urgency Status 1A Status 1B PELD 35+ PELD 3-34 PELD PELD < 15 Inactive LI 7.6 Deceased donor transplant rates among active pediatric waitlist candidates Transplant rates are computed as the number of deceased donor transplants per patient-years of active waiting in a given year. Age is calculated on the first active listing date in a given year. Pediatric candidates aged 12 to 17 years can be assigned MELD or PELD scores. 5 Age 5 Race Deaths per wait-list years 4 3 < Deaths per wait-list years 4 3 White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown LI 7.7 Pretransplant mortality rates among pediatric transplant candidates, by age Mortality rates are computed as the number of deaths per patient-years of waiting in the given year. Candidates concurrently listed at multiple centers are counted once. Deaths after removal from the waiting list are not counted. Age is calculated on the later of listing date or January 1 of the given year. 8 6 Transplants 6 4 Deceased donor Living donor Transplants Related Distantly related Unrelated directed Other LI 7.8 Pediatric transplants, by donor type Recipients of transplant LI 7.9 Pediatric transplants from living donors Relationship of living donor to recipient is as indicated on the OPTN Living Donor Registration Form. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
22 22 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report pediatrictransplant N % N % Age < Sex Female Male Race White Black Hispanic Asian Other/unknown Primary diagnosis Acute hepatic necrosis HCV Cholestatic disease Malignancy Other/unknown Liver tx history First transplant 1, , Retransplant Blood type A B AB O Insurance Private Medicare Medicaid Other government Other/unknown Waiting time < 31 days days days < 6 months < 12 months < 2 years < 3 years years Unknown 1.2. Medical condition Hospitalized: ICU Hospitalized: not ICU Not hospitalized Unknown. 1.1 Medical urgency Status 1/1A/1B MELD MELD MELD MELD < Other/unknown Procedure type Whole 1, , Partial Split Donor type Deceased 1, , Living Previous abdominal surgery Portal vein thrombosis Incident tumor found at tx Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis ABO compatibility Comp./iden. 1, , Incompatible recipients 1,73. 1, EBV- EBV+ EBV Unknown LI 7.11 Incidence of PTLD among pediatric transplant recipients, by recipient EBV status at transplant, 1-11 Cumulative incidence is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier competing risk method. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is identified as a reported complication or cause of death on the OPTN Transplant Recipient Follow-up Form or on the Posttransplant Malignancy Form as polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD, or Hodgkin disease. Only the earliest date of PTLD diagnosis is considered. EBV, Epstein-Barr virus. LI 7. Characteristics of pediatric transplant recipients, 1-3 and Liver transplant recipients, including retransplants. As MELD/PELD scoring began in 2, the 1-3 cohort includes many recipients of unknown status. Pediatric candidates aged 12 to 17 years can be assigned MELD or PELD scores. HCV, hepatitis C virus.
23 23 pediatrictransplant Induction agents Calcineurin inhibitor Anti-metabolite mtor inhibitors Steroids IL2-RA T-cell depleting None Cyclosporine Tacrolimus Azathioprine Mycophenolate At transplant 1 year posttransplant At transplant 1 year posttransplant LI 7.12 Immunosuppression in pediatric transplant recipients One-year posttransplantdata arelimited topatients alivewith graft function at1 yearposttransplant. Mycophenolateincludes mycophenolatemofetil andmycophenolate sodium. IL2-RA, interleukin-2 receptor antagonist; mtor, mammalian target of rapamycin day 1-year 3-year 5-year -year LI 7.13 Graft survival among pediatric transplant recipients: deceased donor pediatric recipients of deceased donor s, including multi-organ transplants. Patients are followed until the earliest of retransplant, death, or December 31, 13. Estimates computed with Cox proportional hazards models reporting, adjusted for age, sex, and race day 1-year 3-year 5-year -year LI 7.14 Graft survival among pediatric transplant recipients: living donor pediatric reciients of living donor s, including multi-organ transplants. Patients are followed until the earliest of retransplant, death, or December 31, 13. Estimates computed with Cox proportional hazards models reporting, adjusted for age, sex, and race < LI 7.15 Incidence of first acute rejection among pediatric transplant recipients, by age, 7-11 Acute rejection is defined as a record of acute or hyperacute rejection, or a record on the OPTN Transplant Recipient Registration Form or Transplant Recipient Follow-up Form of an anti-rejection drug being administered. Only the first rejection event is counted. Cumulative incidence is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier competing risk method. data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
24 24 OPTN/SRTR 13 Annual Data Report pediatrictransplant Age 9 8 < Primary diagnosis 9 8 AHN Chol. disease Malignancy Other/unknown Medical urgency Retransplant 9 9 1st transplant Retransplant Status 1A, 1B, or PELD > PELD LI 7.16 Graft survival among pediatric transplant recipients: deceased donors, 4-8 Graft survival estimated using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier methods. Pediatric candidates aged 12 to 17 years can be assigned MELD or PELD scores. AHN, acute hepatic necrosis; Chol. disease, cholestatic disease; HCV, hepatitis C virus. of recipients who died 1 year after transplant Graft failure Infection Cardio/cerebrovascular Malignancy Respiratory of recipients who died 5 years after transplant Graft failure Infection Cardio/cerebrovascular Malignancy Respiratory Months since transplant s since transplant LI 7.17 Cumulative incidence of death by cause among pediatric recipients, 7-11 Primary cause of death is as reported on the OPTN Transplant Follow-up Form. Other causes of death include hemorrhage, trauma, noncompliance, unspecified other, unknown, etc. Cumulative incidence is estimated using Kaplan-Meier competing risk methods.
25 Seattle (3) Portland (2) Stanford San Francisco (2) Palo Alto Los Angeles (4) Loma Linda La Jolla San Diego (2) Minneapolis (2) Rochester (2) Murray Salt Lake City (2) Iowa City Omaha Denver Aurora (2) Kansas City, KS Kansas City, MO (2) Oklahoma City (3) Phoenix (2) Little Rock Tucson Dallas (4) Shreveport San Antonio (3) Houston (5) Galveston Honolulu (2) Madison Milwaukee (3) Maywood Chicago (5) St. Louis (2) Memphis (2) Jackson Durham New Orleans (2) Burlington Rochester Worcester Royal Oak Detroit (2) Cleveland (2) Ann Arbor Newark Danville Hershey Philadelphia (6) Camden Wilmington Pittsburgh (4) Baltimore (2) Columbus Cincinnati (2) Charlottesville Chapel Hill Nashville Charleston Boston (3) Hartford New Haven Valhalla Bronx New York (4) Washington, DC Indianapolis Richmond Louisville Lexington Charlotte Atlanta (3) Birmingham (2) Jacksonville Gainesville Orlando Tampa Weston Ft. Lauderdale Hato Rey Miami 25 LI 8.1 Centers performing adult transplants or listing active candidates, within DSAs, data behind the figures can be downloaded from our website, at srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov
heart OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report:
heart waiting list... deceased donation... transplant... donor-recipient matching outcomes... pediatric transplant... transplant center maps... 6 11 12 1 16 19 2 M. Colvin-Adams1,2, J. M. Smith1,3, B.
More informationOPTN/SRTR 2014 ANNUAL DATA REPORT
OPTN/SRTR 14 ANNUAL DATA REPORT KIDNEY A Hart 1, J M Smith 2,3, M A Skeans 3, S K Gustafson 3, D E Stewart 4,5, W S Cherikh 4,5, J L Wainright 4,5, G Boyle 4,5, J J Snyder 3,6, B L Kasiske 1,3, A K Israni
More informationkidney OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report:
kidney wait list 18 deceased donation 22 live donation 24 transplant 26 donor-recipient matching 28 outcomes 3 pediatric transplant 33 Medicare data 4 transplant center maps 43 A. J. Matas1,2, J. M. Smith1,3,
More information2011 to 2015 New Cancer Incidence Truman Medical Center - Hospital Hill
Number of New Cancers Truman Medical Center Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2015 Statistical Summary Incidence In 2015, Truman Medical Center diagnosed and/or treated 406 new cancer cases. Four patients
More informationTruman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence
Truman Medical Center-Hospital Hill Cancer Registry 2014 Statistical Summary Incidence In 2014, there were 452 new cancer cases diagnosed and or treated at Truman Medical Center- Hospital Hill and an additional
More informationAccess and Outcomes Among Minority Transplant Patients, , with a Focus on Determinants of Kidney Graft Survival
American Journal of Transplantation 2010; 10 (Part 2): 1090 1107 Wiley Periodicals Inc. Special Feature No claim to original US government works Journal compilation C 2010 The American Society of Transplantation
More informationLiver and intestine transplantation: summary analysis,
American Journal of Transplantation 25; 5 (Part 2): 916 933 Blackwell Munksgaard Blackwell Munksgaard 25 Liver and intestine transplantation: summary analysis, 1994 23 Douglas W. Hanto a,, Thomas M. Fishbein
More informationFlorida Cancer Data System STAT File Documentation Version 2019
Florida Cancer Data System STAT File Documentation Version 2019 Field Description NAACCR Item Recoded Patient ID Number 20 Addr at DX - State 80 X County at DX 90 Addr at DX Country 102 X Marital Status
More informationChapter 6: Transplantation
Chapter 6: Transplantation Introduction During calendar year 2012, 17,305 kidney transplants, including kidney-alone and kidney plus at least one additional organ, were performed in the United States.
More informationOPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Preface
OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Preface This Annual Data Report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is the twenty-sixth
More informationVolunteering in Oklahoma City, OK
6/17/2010 Oklahoma City Profile - Volunteering in information on volunteering and civic engagement Volunteering in Oklahoma City, OK Statistics for this area were collected within the Oklahoma City Metropolitan
More informationProgress in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation
Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.net The Open Urology & Nephrology Journal, 214, 7, (Suppl 2: M2) 115-122 115 Progress in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation Jodi M. Smith *,1 and Vikas
More information*
Introduction Cancer is complex, can have many possible causes, and is increasingly common. For the U.S. population, 1 in 2 males and 1 in 3 females is at risk of developing cancer in their lifetime. The
More information2018 National Oncologists Workforce Study OCTOBER 2018
2018 National Oncologists Workforce Study OCTOBER 2018 Introduction Providers have long cautioned that the U.S. healthcare system is facing imminent physician shortages across many different specialties.
More informationNo Other Company Discloses Higher Transplant Survival Rate. Infusions For Emerging Treatments. Date of Use. Recipient Age (yrs)
Units Used In Transplants/Infusions No Other Company Discloses Higher Transplant Survival Rate Family Banking Provides Exclusive Access To Emerging Treatments With Your Own Cells 175 85% Type 1 Diabetes
More informationKey Words. Cancer statistics Incidence Lifetime risk Multiple primaries Survival SEER
The Oncologist Epidemiology and Population Studies: SEER Series Cancer Statistics, Trends, and Multiple Primary Cancer Analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program MATTHEW
More informationCHAPTER 10 CANCER REPORT. Jeremy Chapman. and. Angela Webster
CHAPTER 10 CANCER REPORT Jeremy Chapman and Angela Webster CANCER REPORT ANZDATA Registry 2004 Report This report summarises the cancer (excluding nonmelanocytic skin cancer) experience of patients treated
More informationChapter Two Incidence & prevalence
Chapter Two Incidence & prevalence Science is the observation of things possible, whether present or past. Prescience is the knowledge of things which may come to pass, though but slowly. LEONARDO da Vinci
More information2010 International Nanny Association Salary and Benefits Survey Information in this report is based on the year About Survey Respondents
2010 International Nanny Association Salary and Benefits Survey Information in this report is based on the year 2009 Five hundred and eighty-five (585) in-home child care providers responded to this survey.
More informationGeographic Differences in Event Rates by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score
American Journal of Transplantation 2006; 6: 2470 2475 Blackwell Munksgaard C 2006 The Authors Journal compilation C 2006 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant
More informationAmerican Cancer Society Estimated Cancer Deaths by Sex and Age (years), 2013
American Cancer Society Estimated Cancer Deaths by Sex and Age (years), 2013 All ages Younger than 45 45 and Older Younger than 65 65 and Older All sites, men 306,920 9,370 297,550 95,980 210,940 All sites,
More informationChapter II: Overview
: Overview Chapter II: Overview This chapter provides an overview of the status of cancer in Minnesota, using cases reported to the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (MCSS) and deaths reported to the
More informationEstimated Minnesota Cancer Prevalence, January 1, MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2. April 2004
MCSS Epidemiology Report 04:2 Suggested citation Perkins C, Bushhouse S.. Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. Minneapolis, MN, http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpcd/ cdee/mcss),. 1 Background Cancer
More informationANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-2005
ANNUAL CANCER REGISTRY REPORT-25 CANCER STATISTICS Distribution of neoplasms Of a total of 3,115 new neoplasms diagnosed or treated at the Hospital from January 25 to December, 25, 1,473 were seen in males
More informationCancer in Utah: An Overview of Cancer Incidence and Mortality from
Cancer in Utah: An Overview of Cancer Incidence and Mortality from 1973-2010 A publication of the Utah Cancer Registry January 2014 Prepared by: C. Janna Harrell, MS Senior Research Analyst Kimberly A.
More informationPredictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients
Pediatr Transplantation 2013: 17: 436 440 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Pediatric Transplantation DOI: 10.1111/petr.12095 Predictors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients
More informationCancer Statistics, 2011
Cancer Statistics, 2011 Cancer Statistics, 2011 The Impact of Eliminating Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities on Premature Cancer Deaths Rebecca Siegel, MPH 1 ; Elizabeth Ward, PhD 2 ; Otis Brawley, MD
More informationTransplant Hepatology
Transplant Hepatology Certification Examination Blueprint Purpose of the exam The exam is designed to evaluate the knowledge, diagnostic reasoning, and clinical judgment skills expected of the certified
More informationAnnual Report. Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care.
Annual Report Cape Cod Hospital and Falmouth Hospital Regional Cancer Network 2013 Expert physicians. Quality hospitals. Superior care. Cape Cod Hospital s Davenport- Mugar Hematology/Oncology Center and
More informationEmbracing the Magic: Increasing Organ Acceptance Rates Through Data Review and Risk Stratification
Embracing the Magic: Increasing Organ Acceptance Rates Through Data Review and Risk Stratification Presented by: Sandy Felty, RN, MSN, MHA Lynette Martin del Campo, RN, MSN, FNP-C Sharon Norfles, RN, BSN
More informationCancer survival in Hong Kong SAR, China,
Chapter 5 Cancer survival in Hong Kong SAR, China, 1996 2001 Law SC and Mang OW Abstract The Hong Kong cancer registry was established in 1963, and cancer registration is done by passive and active methods.
More informationchapter seven transplantation page
chapter seven There been times that I thought I couldn t last for long But now I think I m able to carry on It s been a long, a long time coming But I know a change gonna come, oh yes it will Sam Cooke,
More informationTransplantation and oncogenic risk: the role of viruses
Transplantation and oncogenic risk: the role of viruses VIM 2014, Katoomba Associate Professor Angela Webster angela.webster@sydney.edu.au What can transplantation help us understand about infection and
More informationCancer survival in Shanghai, China,
Cancer survival in Shanghai, China, 1992 1995 Xiang YB, Jin F and Gao YT Abstract The Shanghai cancer registry, established in 1963, is the oldest one in mainland China; cancer registration is entirely
More information2014 U.S. organ and tissue transplant cost estimates and discussion
Prepared by: T. Scott Bentley, FSA Principal and Consulting Actuary Peer Reviewed By: Steven G. Hanson, ASA Actuary 2014 U.S. organ and tissue transplant cost estimates and discussion Prepared by: T. Scott
More informationKidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States,
American Journal of Transplantation 2006; 6 (Part 2): 1153 1169 Blackwell Munksgaard No claim to original US government works Journal compilation C 2006 The American Society of Transplantation and the
More informationCancer in Estonia 2014
Cancer in Estonia 2014 Estonian Cancer Registry (ECR) is a population-based registry that collects data on all cancer cases in Estonia. More information about ECR is available at the webpage of National
More informationCancer survival in Seoul, Republic of Korea,
Cancer survival in Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1993 1997 Ahn YO and Shin MH Abstract The Seoul cancer registry was established in 1991. Cancer is a notifiable disease, and registration of cases is done by
More informationRecords. Adult Kidney Pancreas Transplant Recipient Registration Worksheet. Recipient Information. Provider Information.
Records Adult Kidney Pancreas Transplant Recipient Registration Worksheet FORM APPROVED: O.M.B. NO. 0915 0157 Expiration Date: 07/31/2020 Note: These worksheets are provided to function as a guide to what
More informationHIV/AIDS and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) in the Southern Region of the United States: Epidemiological Overview
HIV/AIDS and other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) in the Southern Region of the United States: Epidemiological Overview Prepared by The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation for Southern States Summit
More informationWalk. Give. To help them live. November 23
PROJECT 13 PARTNERSHIP: St. Jude Children s Research Hospital 2013 Give thanks. Walk. Toolkit Walk. Give. To help them live. November 23 Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. is proud to continue our support
More informationPediatric Liver Tumors and Transplantation. Northwest Regional Pediatric Live Disease Symposium, Seattle WA, April 12, 2008
Pediatric Liver Tumors and Transplantation Northwest Regional Pediatric Live Disease Symposium, Seattle WA, April 12, 2008 Liver transplantation for primary liver tumours in children WHEN? - patient selection
More informationOverview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey
Overview of Gynecologic Cancers in New Jersey New Jersey State Cancer Registry Antoinette M. Stroup, PhD presented at: Gynecologic Cancer Symposium: Striving for a Healthier Tomorrow, Today November 19,
More informationCurrent status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States,
American Journal of Transplantation 25; 5 (Part 2): 94 915 Blackwell Munksgaard Blackwell Munksgaard 25 Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994 23 Gabriel M. Danovitch
More informationS2 File. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS). The CCS is a
S2 File. Clinical Classifications Software (CCS). The CCS is a diagnosis categorization scheme based on the ICD-9-CM that aggregates all diagnosis codes into 262 mutually exclusive, clinically homogeneous
More informationLiver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease in the United States: 1988 to 1995
Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease in the United States: 1988 to 1995 Steven H. Belle, Kimberly C. Beringer, and Katherine M. Detre T he Scientific Liver Transplant Registry (LTR) was established
More informationOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network
OPTN Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network POLICIES This document provides the policy language approved by the OPTN/UNOS Board at its meeting in June 2015 as part of the Operations and Safety Committee
More informationThe pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score
Selection of Pediatric Candidates Under the PELD System Sue V. McDiarmid, 1 Robert M. Merion, 2 Dawn M. Dykstra, 2 and Ann M. Harper 3 Key Points 1. The PELD score accurately predicts the 3 month probability
More information*All Local Monthlies Data releases are scheduled from 9:00pm - 11:00pm for the date shown on the schedule
JUNE 2017 Local Monthlies Release Schedule Market Name Sequence *All Local Monthlies Data releases are scheduled from 9:00pm - 11:00pm for the date shown on the schedule Market Name Market Type Local Monthlies*
More informationEvaluation Process for Liver Transplant Candidates
Evaluation Process for Liver Transplant Candidates 2 Objectives Identify components of the liver transplant referral to evaluation Describe the role of the liver transplant coordinator Describe selection
More informationOPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation
OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donation A. K. Israni 1,2,3, D. Zaun 1, C. Bolch 1, J.D. Rosendale 4,5, C. Schaffhausen 3, J. J. Snyder 1,2, and B. L. Kasiske 1,3 1 Scientific Registry
More informationEpidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report. Cancer
Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report Cancer Epidemiology in Texas 2006 Annual Report Page 94 Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Texas, 2000-2004 The Texas Department of State Health Services Texas Cancer
More informationRepeat Organ Transplantation in the United States,
American Journal of Transplantation 2007; 7 (Part 2): 1424 1433 Blackwell Munksgaard No claim to original US government works Journal compilation C 2007 The American Society of Transplantation and the
More informationCancer Statistics, 2009 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Yongping Hao, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun. DOI: /caac.
Cancer Statistics, 2009 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Yongping Hao, Jiaquan Xu and Michael J. Thun CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59;225-249; originally published online May 27, 2009; DOI: 10.3322/caac.20006
More informationFollowing the introduction of adult-to-adult living
LIVER FAILURE/CIRRHOSIS/PORTAL HYPERTENSION Liver Transplant Recipient Survival Benefit with Living Donation in the Model for Endstage Liver Disease Allocation Era Carl L. Berg, 1 Robert M. Merion, 2 Tempie
More informationNational & International Lectures
2005-2008 National & International Lectures 6/24/05 ECFS Crete, Greece Mucoid Psuedomonas aeruginosa Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, and Lung Disease Progression in Children with Cystic Fibrosis 9/30/05
More informationKidney, Pancreas and Liver Allocation and Distribution
American Journal of Transplantation 2012; 12: 3191 3212 Wiley Periodicals Inc. Special Article C Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons doi:
More informationNIH Public Access Author Manuscript Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 December 17.
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2005 December 15; 104(12 Suppl): 2989 2998. 1999 2001 Cancer Mortality Rates for Asian and Pacific Islander Ethnic Groups
More informationLUNG ALLOCATION SCORE SYSTEM UPDATE
LUNG ALLOCATION SCORE SYSTEM UPDATE Current Lung Allocation System System was implemented on May 4, 25 The Lung Allocation Score (LAS) is based on a combination of Expected survival in next year without
More informationQuarterly Statistical Report
01/04/2008 Page 1 of 26 INTERMACS Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Quarterly Statistical Report Implant dates: March 1, 2006 November 30, 2007 January 4, 2008 Prepared
More information2012 International Nanny Association Salary and Benefits Survey Information in this report is based on the year 2011
2012 International Nanny Association Salary and Benefits Survey Information in this report is based on the year 2011 Six hundred seventy-three (673) in-home child care providers responded to this survey.
More informationCancer Association of South Africa (CANSA)
Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) Fact Sheet on ICD-10 Coding of Neoplasms Introduction The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10 th Revision (ICD-10)
More informationCancer in the Northern Territory :
Cancer in the Northern Territory 1991 21: Incidence, mortality and survival Xiaohua Zhang John Condon Karen Dempsey Lindy Garling Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the many people, who have
More informationCancer in New Mexico 2017
Cancer in New Mexico 0 Please contact us! Phone: 0-- E-Mail: nmtr-info@salud.unm.edu URL: nmtrweb.unm.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... New Cases of Cancer Estimated Number of New Cancer Cases Description
More informationCANCER IN TASMANIA INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY 1996
CANCER IN TASMANIA INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY 1996 CANCER IN TASMANIA INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY 1996 Menzies Centre For Population Health Research Editors: Dace Shugg, Terence Dwyer and Leigh Blizzard Publication
More information"The Most Challenging Places to Live with Asthma"
"The Most Challenging Places to Live with Asthma" The Asthma Capitals is an annual research project of the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA) to identify "the most challenging places to live
More informationCancer in New Mexico 2014
Cancer in New Mexico 2014 Please contact us! Phone: 505-272-5541 E-Mail: info@nmtr.unm.edu http://som.unm.edu/nmtr/ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 New Cases of Cancer: Estimated Number of New Cancer
More informationCancer Statistics, 2014
CA CANCER J CLIN 2014;64:9 29 Cancer Statistics, 2014 Rebecca Siegel, MPH 1 ; Jiemin Ma, PhD 2, *; Zhaohui Zou, MS 3 ; Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD 4 Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers
More informationPancreas and Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation By: Kay R. Brown, CLCP
Pancreas and Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation By: Kay R. Brown, CLCP Pancreas transplant recipients are usually under age 50. The majority of pancreas transplants are performed on diabetics, who are generally
More informationCancer survival in Busan, Republic of Korea,
Cancer survival in Busan, Republic of Korea, 1996 2001 Shin HR, Lee DH, Lee SY, Lee JT, Park HK, Rha SH, Whang IK, Jung KW, Won YJ and Kong HJ Abstract The Busan cancer registry was established in 1996;
More informationCancer Statistics, 2010 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Jiaquan Xu and Elizabeth Ward. DOI: /caac.20073
Statistics, 21 Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca Siegel, Jiaquan Xu and Elizabeth Ward CA J Clin 21;6;277-3; originally published online Jul 7, 21; DOI: 1.3322/caac.273 This information is current as of February
More informationAPPENDIX ONE: ICD CODES
APPENDIX ONE: ICD CODES ICD-10-AM ICD-9-CM Malignant neoplasms C00 C97 140 208, 238.6, 273.3 Lip, oral cavity and pharynx C00 C14 140 149 Digestive organs C15 C26 150 157, 159 Oesophagus 4 C15 150 excluding
More information2016 Cancer Registry Annual Report
2016 Cancer Registry Annual Report Cancer Committee Chairman s Report The Cancer Committee at Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA) at Eastern Regional Medical Center (Eastern), established in 2006,
More informationSKCC Protocol Review Committee New Study Application
Instructions: Submit the following documents to prc@jefferson.edu - Completed New Study Application (aka MCSF) - Protocol - Protocol Facilitation Committee Approval (if applicable) - MDG Priority Score
More informationThe Regulatory Alphabet: CMS, OPTN, HRSA, SRTR, UNOS And Monitoring of Transplant Outcomes
The Regulatory Alphabet: CMS, OPTN, HRSA, SRTR, UNOS And Monitoring of Transplant Outcomes John Paul Roberts M.D. University of California San Francisco NONE Disclosures Outcome Monitoring Outcome monitoring
More informationResearch Article Cancer Incidence in Egypt: Results of the National Population-Based Cancer Registry Program
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Cancer Epidemiology Volume 2014, Article ID 437971, 18 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/437971 Research Article Cancer Incidence in Egypt: Results of the National
More informationSurvival Benefit-Based Deceased-Donor Liver Allocation
American Journal of Transplantation 2009; 9 (Part 2): 970 981 Wiley Periodicals Inc. No claim to original US government works Journal compilation C 2009 The American Society of Transplantation and the
More informationS OUTHEAST CANCER C ENTER. Annual Cancer Report 2015
S OUTHEAST CANCER C ENTER Annual Cancer Report 2015 Treatment of Squamous Cell Anal Cancer at Southeast Alabama Medical Center By Steven Stokes, MD and Jarrod B. Adkison, MD 2 Medical Director Dr. Steve
More informationMULTI-VISCERAL TRANSPLANT COMMONLY INTERPRETED TERMS
MULTI-VISCERAL TRANSPLANT COMMONLY INTERPRETED TERMS Active Candidate A transplant candidate eligible to be considered for organ offers at a given point in time. Some transplant candidates are temporarily
More informationHistorically, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Delayed Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Exception Score Improves Disparity in Access to Liver Transplant in the United States Julie K. Heimbach, 1 Ryutaro Hirose, 2 Peter G.
More informationCancer in Central and South America BOLIVIA
Cancer in Central and South America BOLIVIA This country profile for the Cancer in Central and South America project provides, for each participating cancer registry tables and graphics showing numbers
More informationClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: September 30, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT
ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: September 30, 2013 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00758043 Study Identification Unique Protocol ID: VX08-950-111 Brief
More informationCHAPTER 3 DEATHS. Stephen McDonald Leonie Excell Brian Livingston
CHAPTER 3 DEATHS Stephen McDonald Leonie Excell Brian Livingston DEATHS ANZDATA Registry 2008 Report INTRODUCTION AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND The total number of deaths was 1,452 (15.4 deaths per 100 patient
More informationCancer Incidence in New Jersey Implementation of the Year 2000 Population Standard
Cancer Incidence in New Jersey 1995-1999 Implementation of the Year 2000 Population Standard Prepared by: Stasia S. Burger, MS, CTR Judith B. Klotz, MS, DrPH Rachel Weinstein, MS, PhD Toshi Abe, MSW, CTR
More informationKidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States, : Access for Patients with Diabetes and End-Stage Renal Disease
American Journal of Transplantation 29; 9 (Part 2): 894 96 Wiley Periodicals Inc. No claim to original US government works Journal compilation C 29 The American Society of Transplantation and the American
More informationKidney Transplant Outcomes In Elderly Patients. Simin Goral MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Kidney Transplant Outcomes In Elderly Patients Simin Goral MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Case Discussion 70 year old Asian male, neuropsychiatrist, works full
More informationDo you have myelofibrosis?
Do you have myelofibrosis? Learn more about a clinical study. What Is a Clinical Study? A clinical study is a way to evaluate a drug in people with a certain illness. Some clinical studies (or clinical
More informationPatient Name: MRN: DOB: Treatment Location:
Page 1 of 5 I. TO (Required) This Section is required to be completed by all patients who undergo kidney transplant surgery. I hereby consent to and authorize Dr. and his/her assistant(s), including supervised
More informationCANCER RATES AND TRENDS IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA. MCSS Epidemiology Report 97:1. September 1997
CANCER RATES AND TRENDS IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA MCSS Epidemiology Report 97: September 997 Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System Chronic Disease And Environmental Epidemiology Section Minnesota Department
More informationIdentifying Geographic & Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Care for Pediatric Cancer Patients in Texas
Identifying Geographic & Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Care for Pediatric Cancer Patients in Texas Mary T. Austin, MD, MPH Assistant Professor, Pediatric Surgery University of Texas Health Science
More informationNephrology Grand Rounds
Nephrology Grand Rounds PTLD in Kidney Transplantation Charles Le University of Colorado 6/15/12 Objectives Background Pathogenesis Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestation Incidence Risk Factors CNS Lymphoma
More informationCancer in Colorado Incidence, Mortality, and Survival
Cancer in Colorado 1998-2003 Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Jack L. Finch, M.S. Statistical Analyst III Kieu O. Vu, M.S.P.H. Statistical Analyst II 2007 Colorado Central Cancer Registry Randi K. Rycroft,
More informationSPRINT SCHEDULE NO. 11 1st Revised Page Originating Locations for Business Communications Services
1st Revised Page 1 9. SERVICE AREAS AND RATE STEP TABLES 1. Service Locations 1. Originating Locations for Business Communications Services Sprint Clarity, Sprint Premiere, Real Solutions, Business Sense
More informationConstruction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts
Construction of a North American Cancer Survival Index to Measure Progress of Cancer Control Efforts Chris Johnson, Cancer Data Registry of Idaho NAACCR 2016 Annual Conference June 14, 2016 Concurrent
More informationCancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S.
Cancer Causes Control (2008) 19:227 256 DOI 10.1007/s10552-007-9088-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S. Barry A. Miller
More informationPrevalence and Outcomes of Multiple-Listing for Cadaveric Kidney and Liver Transplantation
American Journal of Transplantation 24; 4: 94 1 Blackwell Munksgaard Copyright C Blackwell Munksgaard 23 doi: 1.146/j.16-6135.23.282.x Prevalence and Outcomes of Multiple-Listing for Cadaveric Kidney and
More informationU.S. Apartment Markets Outlook
Market Advisory Services U.S. Apartment Markets Outlook Recent surge in absorption lays foundation for better performance ahead 1 Year-Year Change in 20-34 Employment (000) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
More informationThe number of patients on the active liver transplant list at 31 March 2017 was 530, a fall of 8% from 2016
8 Liver Activity Liver Activity Key messages The number of patients on the active liver transplant list at 31 March 2017 was 530, a fall of 8% from 2016 The number of liver donors after brain death increased
More informationCancer prevalence. Chapter 7
Chapter 7 Cancer prevalence Prevalence measures the number of people diagnosed with cancer who are still alive. This chapter presents current and historical statistics on cancer prevalence in Ontario.
More informationWLH Tumor Frequencies between cohort enrollment and 31-Dec Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to:
DESCRIPTION Below the Women Lifestyle and Health tumor frequencies are tabulated according to: Benign =171 (Cervix uteri) treated as not recorded =191 (non-melanoma skin cancer) treated as not recorded
More information