Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:"

Transcription

1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. Study No.: SAM40049 (150905) Title: A Danish, multi-centre, comparative, parallel-group study to determine whether initiation of combination treatment with Seretide (salmeterol + fluticasone propionate) 50/100 µg bd offers better asthma control than monotherapy with Flixotide (fluticasone propionate) 100 µg bd to adult asthmatic subjects uncontrolled on shortacting bronchodilator alone. Rationale: This clinical trial was designed to determine whether initiation of combination treatment with salmeterol (SAL) + fluticasone propionate (FP) improves asthma control greater than initiation of treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid, in asthmatic subjects uncontrolled on short-acting bronchodilator alone. Phase: IV Study Period: 8 May 2001 to 4 September Study Design: A multi-centre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study. Centres: 45 active centres in Denmark. Indication: Asthma. Treatment: Following a 2 week baseline period, subjects were randomised (1:1) to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Subjects either received 50/100 µg twice daily (bd) for 24 weeks or FP 100 µg bd for 24 weeks. Subjects were instructed to take 1 inhalation each morning and each evening. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine whether initiation of combination treatment with (50/100 µg bd) offers better asthma control, determined as fewer day+night s with symptoms, than initiation of monotherapy with FP (100 µg bd) to asthmatic subjects uncontrolled on short-acting bronchodilator alone. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The primary efficacy variable was symptom-free day+night s. Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): The secondary efficacy variables were: morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam); evening peak expiratory flow (PEFpm); diurnal PEF variation; albuterol use, as needed (prn [pro re nata]); days and nights without albuterol prn use; day symptom score; night symptom score; symptom-free days; symptom-free nights; asthma exacerbations; episode-free day+night s (day symptom score = 0, night symptom score = 0, no albuterol prn use, no adverse events [AEs], no exacerbations); weeks with treatment success (+1 more symptom-free day+night /week vs. baseline mean); time to improved asthma control; subject treatment preference, and AEs. Statistical Methods: The percentage of symptom-free day+night s (psfree) was analysed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) F-tests, allowing for effects due to treatment, subject, period and sequence. P-values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for treatment differences were calculated. If normal distribution assumptions were not met, psfree was analysed using non-parametric alternatives testing for treatment difference. The Total Population comprised all subjects who entered the study; this population was used for tabulating reasons for withdrawal before randomisation. All subjects who entered the study and were randomised, with the exception of those for whom documented evidence existed that they did not take any treatment, were included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population; this population was used for all tables and analyses and was the primary population for the analysis of the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints and safety. Study Population: Male and non-pregnant female subjects using adequate contraception were eligible if they: were at least 18 years old; had been diagnosed with asthma, as defined by the American Thoracic Society with a clinical history of symptoms of episodic cough, wheezing, and dyspnea; had an asthma medical history of at least 3 months; and had only been treating their asthma with a short-acting bronchodilator, which had been used for relief of symptoms for at least 1 episode per week according to prescription, for at least 2 months prior to Visit 1. Subjects were eligible for randomisation, following the baseline period, if the following applied: a diary completed for at least 11 days and 11 nights; either diurnal PEF variation 20% on at least 2 days or one of the following must have been determined within 3 years prior to baseline: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) reversibility 15% in response to bronchodilator, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) 4 mg/ml, diurnal PEF variation 20%; mean relief medication (albuterol) use 1 episode/week; and day or night symptom score 1 at least once/week. Subjects were excluded if they had: upper or lower respiratory tract infection or middle ear infection within 1 month prior to Visit 1; problems with wrong or inadequate inhaler or peak flow meter technique; other lung diseases than asthma; known or suspected other diseases or situations likely to affect the outcome of the study results; and known serious cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, untreated hypokalaemia, or thyrotoxicosis. Other exclusion criteria included: use of long-acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids, or other long-acting asthma medication within 2 1

2 months prior to Visit 1; use of daily oral corticosteroid treatment within 2 months of Visit 1 or oral corticosteroid therapy within 1 month prior to Visit 1; use of other medication that could affect the course of asthma or interfere with study results; known or suspected hypersensitivity reaction to drug recipients. Subjects with involvement in another clinical study with a study drug within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during this study, or who had previously been randomised to this study were not eligible. Number of Subjects: Planned, N Randomised, N Completed, n (%) 67 (86) 59 (82) Total Number Subjects Withdrawn, n (%) 11 (14) 13 (18) Withdrawn due to Adverse Events, n (%) 1 (1) 2 (3) Withdrawn due to Lack of Efficacy, n (%) Not reported Not reported Withdrawn for Other Reasons, n (%) 10 (13) 11 (15) Demographics N (ITT) Females: Males 40: 38 45: 27 Mean Age, years (SD) 39.3 (15.4) 38.4 (15.1) Race, n (%) Not reported Not reported Primary Efficacy Results: (ITT Population) Percentage of symptom-free day+night s: Baseline period, N evaluable Mean percentage of psfree at baseline (SD) 19.5 (28.5) 23.7 (29.1) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean percentage of psfree at run-in (SD) 53.7 (36.6) 42.5 (37.9) Mean percentage of psfree at assessment (SD) 63.8 (34.6) 50.6 (36.9) 95% CI 55.2, , 59.3 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI 0.94, p-value Secondary Outcome Variable(s): (ITT Population) PEFam: Mean PEFam at baseline (SD) (117.0) (108.7) Mean PEFam at run-in (SD) (126.9) (116.7) Mean PEFam at assessment (SD) (130.2) (126.0) 95% CI 405.8, , Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI , PEFpm: Mean PEFpm at baseline (SD) (123.5) (113.3) Mean PEFpm at run-in (SD) (127.9) (118.0) Mean PEFpm at assessment (SD) (127.5) (125.8) 95% CI 418.4, , Difference between treatments, vs FP

3 95% CI , Diurnal PEF variation: Mean diurnal PEF at baseline (SD) 6.1 (10.1) 4.6 (5.7) Mean diurnal PEF at run-in (SD) 2.7 (6.3) 3.2 (5.4) Mean diurnal PEF at assessment (SD) 2.6 (6.4) 2.6 (4.8) 95% CI 1.2, , 4.0 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -1.95, 1.89 Albuterol prn use: Mean albuterol use at baseline (SD), episodes per day+night 2.3 (1.7) 2.1 (1.3) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean albuterol use at run-in (SD) 1.1 (1.2) 1.7 (1.7) Assessment period, N evaluable Mean albuterol use at assessment (SD) 1.1 (1.2) 1.3 (1.2) 95% CI 0.8, , 1.6 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -0.61, 0.24 Day+night s without albuterol prn use: Mean percentage of days/nights without use at baseline (SD) 21.5 (29.4) 24.8 (29.3) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean percentage of days/nights without use at run-in (SD) 63.2 (35.9) 47.5 (37.7) Mean percentage of days/nights without use at assessment (SD) 70.8 (33.4) 62.5 (34.6) 95% CI 62.6, , 70.8 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -3.38, Day symptom score: Baseline period, N evaluable Mean day symptom score at baseline (SD) 1.4 (0.8) 1.3 (0.9) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean day symptom score at run-in (SD) 0.7 (0.7) 0.9 (1.0) Mean day symptom score at assessment (SD) 0.5 (0.6) 0.7 (0.9) 95% CI 0.3, , 0.9 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -0.48, 0.03 Night symptom score: Mean night symptom score at baseline (SD) 0.6 (0.6) 0.5 (0.5) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean night symptom score at run-in (SD) 0.3 (0.4) 0.4 (0.5) Assessment period, N evaluable Mean night symptom score at assessment (SD) 0.2 (0.4) 0.2 (0.3) 95% CI 0.1, , 0.3 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI , Percentage of symptom-free days: Baseline period, N evaluable Mean percentage of symptom-free days at baseline (SD) 24.6 (31.6) 30.7 (31.9) Run-in period, N evaluable

4 Mean percentage of symptom-free days at run-in (SD) 55.8 (37.5) 49.6 (37.8) Mean percentage of symptom-free days at assessment (SD) 65.8 (33.8) 56.6 (36.1) 95% CI 57.4, , 65.1 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -2.74, Percentage of symptom-free nights: Mean percentage of symptom-free nights at baseline (SD) 55.8 (36.7) 61.1 (34.8) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean percentage of symptom-free nights at run-in (SD) 78.6 (29.2) 73.5 (31.1) Assessment period, N evaluable Mean percentage of symptom-free nights at assessment (SD) 82.8 (27.7) 80.4 (26.7) 95% CI 76.3, , 87.0 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI -6.86, Asthma exacerbations: N evaluable Subjects with asthma exacerbation, n (%) 1 (1) 1 (1) Subjects without asthma exacerbation, n (%) 74 (99) 69 (99) Episode-free day+night s: Baseline period, N evaluable Mean percentage of episode-free days at baseline (SD) 14.8 (26.0) 17.0 (25.4) Run-in period, N evaluable Mean percentage of episode-free days at run-in (SD) 49.0 (36.8) 36.8 (36.4) Mean percentage of episode-free days at assessment (SD) 60.0 (36.1) 46.7 (37.2) 95% CI 51.2, , 55.6 Difference between treatments, vs FP % CI 0.79, Weeks with treatment success: Assessment period, N evaluable Mean percentage of psfree at assessment (SD) 14.1 (8.9) 12.1 (9.2) Time to improved asthma control (days): A definition of improved asthma control was not defined pre-study or pre-analysis. Therefore not determined. If defined and analysed later the analysis will clearly be marked post-hoc. N evaluable Mean time to improved asthma control (SD) Subject treatment preference: N evaluable Prefer the same drug in the future n (%) Yes 46 (79) 30 (60) No 8 (14) 12 (24) Don t know 3 (5) 8 (16) Safety Results: ITT Population - All AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during the treatment period of the study, from Visit 1 to Follow-up, were reported. Most Frequent Adverse Events On-Therapy n (%) n (%) Subjects with any AE(s), n (%) 48 (62) 42 (58) Headache 17 (22) 23 (32) Common cold 6 (8) 6 (8) Cough 4 (5) 6 (8) Back pain 4 (5) 3 (4) 4

5 Myalgia(s) 3 (4) 1 (1) Odontalgia 2 (3) 2 (3) Hay fever 2 (3) 1 (1) Influenza 2 (3) 1 (1) Oral candidiasis 2 (3) 1 (1) Sore throat 2 (3) 1 (1) Allergic conjunctivitis 2 (3) 0 Arthralgia 2 (3) 0 Bronchitis 2 (3) 0 Hoarseness 2 (3) 0 Nasal congestion 2 (3) 0 Tachycardia 2 (3) 0 Tonsillitis 2 (3) 0 Eczema 1 (1) 3 (4) Psychiatric depression 1 (1) 3 (4) Sinusitis 1 (1) 3 (4) Gastric pain 1 (1) 2 (3) Shoulder pain 1 (1) 2 (3) Cystitis 0 2 (3) Diarrhea 0 2 (3) Dysmenorrhea 0 2 (3) Fever 0 2 (3) Gastric disorder 0 2 (3) Neck pain 0 2 (3) Pneumonia 0 2 (3) Pruritus 0 2 (3) Recurrent sore throat 0 2 (3) Serious Adverse Events - On-Therapy n (%) [n considered by the investigator to be related to study medication] Subjects with non-fatal SAEs, n (%) 1 (1) 2 (3) Suspected asthma exacerbation 1 (1) [0] 0 Fracture of the tibia 0 1 (1) [0] Ascites 0 1 (1) [0] Subjects with fatal SAEs, n (%) 0 1 (1) Death 0 1 (1) [0] Conclusion: See publications below Publications: Strand AM & Luckow A: Initiation of maintenance treatment of persistent asthma: salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Respiratory Medicine 2004, 98: Strand AM & Luckow A: Initiation of treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product is more effective than inhaled steroid alone in asthmatic patients symptomatic on short-acting bronchodilator alone, ERS 2003 Date Updated: 07-Dec

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1) Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1) salmeterol/fluticasone propionate () (mcg strength) bd via DISKUS/ACCUHALER

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS Study No.: A3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, -Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS Formulations of Salmeterol (SAL) 50mcg BID and Fluticasone Propionate

More information

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI

UMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:

Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product 50/250 micro g twice daily and budesonide 800 micro g twice daily in the treatment of adults and adolescents with asthma Lundback

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005 Drug product: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 μg Drug substance(s): Budesonide/formoterol Study code: SD-039-0728 Edition No.: FINAL Date: 27 February 2006 SYNOPSIS A 52-week, randomized, double-blind, single-dummy,

More information

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004 Drug product Drug substance(s) Document No. Edition No. Study code SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 mg per actuation Budesonide/formoterol SD-039-0719 Date 15 June 2004 SYNOPSIS A Six-Month, Randomized, Open-Label

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: he study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE. Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: 1 Study code: Accolate Zafirlukast (ZD9188) 9188IL/0138 Date: 02 May 2007 SYNOPSIS A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, -controlled, Parallel

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives : Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives : Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Analysis of immunogenicity

Analysis of immunogenicity The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT Drug product: Drug substance(s): Edition No.: Study code: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 g Budesonide/formoterol D5896C00005 Date: 8 May 2006 SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres). Drug product: Symbicort Turbuhaler Drug substance(s): ST (Symbicort Turbuhaler ) Edition No.: 1.0 Study code: D5890C00010 Date: 15 March 2007 SYNOPSIS An 8-week, randomised, double blind, parallel-group,

More information

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD TORCH: and Propionate and Survival in COPD April 19, 2007 Justin Lee Pharmacy Resident University Health Network Outline Overview of COPD Pathophysiology Pharmacological Treatment Overview of the TORCH

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

G. Boyd on behalf of a UK Study group

G. Boyd on behalf of a UK Study group Eur Respir J, 1995, 8, 1494 1498 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.95.08091494 Printed in UK - all rights reserved Copyright ERS Journals Ltd 1995 European Respiratory Journal ISSN 0903-1936 Salmeterol xinafoate in

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers). Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: Study code: Date: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 µg Budesonide/formoterol SD-039-0725 17 February 2005 SYNOPSIS A Twelve-Week, Randomized, Double-blind,

More information

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Study centres This was a multicentre study conducted in 53 centres in Sweden.

SYNOPSIS. Study centres This was a multicentre study conducted in 53 centres in Sweden. Drug product: Symbicort Turbuhaler Drug substance(s): Budesonide/Formoterol Edition No.: 1 Study code: LD-039-0003 Date: 20 May 2005 SYNOPSIS An open, randomized, parallel group, multicentre, phase IIIB

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

The Asthma Guidelines: Diagnosis and Assessment of Asthma

The Asthma Guidelines: Diagnosis and Assessment of Asthma The Asthma Guidelines: Diagnosis and Assessment of Asthma Christopher H. Fanta, M.D. Partners Asthma Center Brigham and Women s Hospital Harvard Medical School Objectives Know how the diagnosis of asthma

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial Nicolas Roche, Kenneth R. Chapman, Claus F. Vogelmeier, Felix JF Herth, Chau Thach, Robert Fogel, Petter Olsson,

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Study No.: 29060/717 Title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Fixed-Dose Study of CR Intermittent Dosing (12.5 mg and 25 mg) for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Rationale: In most trials investigating

More information

Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom

Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom 2 BEYOND SYMPTOMS ADDRESSING FUTURE RISK IN ASTHMA South GP CME 2013,

More information

HM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics>

HM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics> The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Sponsor Novartis Consumer Health, SA. Generic Drug Name

Sponsor Novartis Consumer Health, SA. Generic Drug Name Sponsor Novartis Consumer Health, SA Generic Drug Name Xylometazoline Hydrochloride Trial Indication(s) For the symptomatic relief of nasal congestion due to colds, hayfever or other allergic rhinitis,

More information

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Scottish Medicines Consortium Scottish Medicines Consortium budesonide/formoterol 100/6, 200/6 turbohaler (Symbicort SMART ) No. (362/07) Astra Zeneca UK Limited 9 March 2007 (Issued May 2007) The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC)

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004 Drug product SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 µg SYNOPSIS Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Date 16 December 2004 A Twelve-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled

More information

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD Therapeutic Effect of Zafirlukast as Monotherapy in Steroid-Naive Patients With Severe Persistent Asthma* James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren,

More information

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS. DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS Samy Suissa, PhD ABSTRACT Dual-controller therapy, or combinations of 2 or more pharmacotherapies with complementary mechanisms

More information

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory Thorax 2000;55:837 841 837 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK S Lim A Jatakanon K F Chung P J Barnes Napp Laboratories

More information

Long Term Care Formulary RS -29

Long Term Care Formulary RS -29 RESTRICTED USE Asthma/COPD Management 1 of 6 PROTOCOL: Asthma Glossary of Medication Acronyms: SABA: short-acting beta agonist (e.g. salbutamol) SABD: short-acting bronchodilator (e.g. ipratropium or SABA)

More information

GINA. At-A-Glance Asthma Management Reference. for adults, adolescents and children 6 11 years. Updated 2017

GINA. At-A-Glance Asthma Management Reference. for adults, adolescents and children 6 11 years. Updated 2017 GINA At-A-Glance Asthma Management Reference for adults, adolescents and children 6 11 years Updated 2017 This resource should be used in conjunction with the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Periods: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

ASTRAZENECA v GLAXOSMITHKLINE

ASTRAZENECA v GLAXOSMITHKLINE CASE AUTH/1833/5/06 ASTRAZENECA v GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONCEPT study leavepiece AstraZeneca complained that a leavepiece issued by Allen & Hanburys, part of GlaxoSmithKline, did not present a fair and balanced

More information

CHALLENGES OF REAL LIFE ASTHMA MANAGEMENT. Dr Chris Lewis Respiratory Physician and Director of Prevocational Training Auckland District Health Board

CHALLENGES OF REAL LIFE ASTHMA MANAGEMENT. Dr Chris Lewis Respiratory Physician and Director of Prevocational Training Auckland District Health Board CHALLENGES OF REAL LIFE ASTHMA MANAGEMENT Dr Chris Lewis Respiratory Physician and Director of Prevocational Training Auckland District Health Board CONFLICT OF INTEREST Employee of Auckland District Health

More information

Treatment Responses. Ronald Dahl, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Treatment Responses. Ronald Dahl, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark Asthma and COPD: Are They a Spectrum Treatment Responses Ronald Dahl, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark Pharmacological Treatments Bronchodilators Inhaled short-acting β -Agonist (rescue) Inhaled short-acting

More information

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits B/1 Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits MODULE B The 1997 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Expert Panel guidelines on asthma management recommend a 4-step approach

More information

fluticasone furoate / vilanterol 92/22, 184/22 micrograms inhalation powder (Relvar Ellipta ) SMC No. (966/14) GlaxoSmithKline UK

fluticasone furoate / vilanterol 92/22, 184/22 micrograms inhalation powder (Relvar Ellipta ) SMC No. (966/14) GlaxoSmithKline UK fluticasone furoate / vilanterol 92/22, 184/22 micrograms inhalation powder (Relvar Ellipta ) SMC No. (966/14) GlaxoSmithKline UK 09 May 2014 The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has completed its assessment

More information

Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended.

Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended. Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended Bricanyl () DK/W/0017/pdWS/001 Rapporteur: Denmark Finalisation procedure

More information

Omalizumab (Xolair ) ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September Indication

Omalizumab (Xolair ) ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September Indication ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September 2003 Indication The FDA recently approved Omalizumab on June 20, 2003 for adults and adolescents (12 years of age and above) with moderate to

More information

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. abcd Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. The synopsis

More information

Tips on managing asthma in children

Tips on managing asthma in children Tips on managing asthma in children Dr Ranjan Suri Consultant in Respiratory Paediatrics Bupa Cromwell Hospital Clinics: Friday (pm) Asthma in Children Making the diagnosis Patterns of childhood asthma

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Children based on the British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network September 2016

Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Children based on the British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network September 2016 Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Children based on the British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network September 2016 Diagnosis: There is no lower limit to the age at which

More information

Outcomes: Initially, our primary definitions of pneumonia was severe pneumonia, where the subject was hospitalized

Outcomes: Initially, our primary definitions of pneumonia was severe pneumonia, where the subject was hospitalized The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Supplementary Appendix

Supplementary Appendix Supplementary Appendix This appendix has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Supplement to: Papi A, Canonica GW, Maestrelli P, et al. Rescue use of beclomethasone

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study Study No.: ADF105220 Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil () tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study against lamivudine ()- Rationale: This study wass a confirmatory

More information

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010 The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION 15 December 2010 HIROBRIZ BREEZHALER 150 micrograms, inhalation powder, hard capsules B/10 with inhaler (CIP code:

More information

TREAMENT OF RECURRENT VIRUS-INDUCED WHEEZING IN YOUNG CHILDREN. Dr Lại Lê Hưng Respiratory Department

TREAMENT OF RECURRENT VIRUS-INDUCED WHEEZING IN YOUNG CHILDREN. Dr Lại Lê Hưng Respiratory Department TREAMENT OF RECURRENT VIRUS-INDUCED WHEEZING IN YOUNG CHILDREN Dr Lại Lê Hưng Respiratory Department Literature review current through: Feb 2013. This topic last updated: Aug 14, 2012 INTRODUCTION Wheezing

More information

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized DANIEL E. HILLEMAN, PharmD ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To review the role of long-acting bronchodilators in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including the importance of treatment

More information

ADULT ASTHMA GUIDE SUMMARY. This summary provides busy health professionals with key guidance for assessing and treating adult asthma.

ADULT ASTHMA GUIDE SUMMARY. This summary provides busy health professionals with key guidance for assessing and treating adult asthma. ADULT ASTHMA GUIDE SUMMARY This summary provides busy health professionals with key guidance for assessing and treating adult asthma. Its source document Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ Adult Asthma

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Controversial Issues in the Management of Childhood Asthma: Insights from NIH Asthma Network Studies

Controversial Issues in the Management of Childhood Asthma: Insights from NIH Asthma Network Studies Controversial Issues in the Management of Childhood Asthma: Insights from NIH Asthma Network Studies Stanley J. Szefler, MD Helen Wohlberg and Herman Lambert Chair in Pharmacokinetics, Head, Pediatric

More information

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: GSK Medicine: abacavir (ABC)/dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) Study Number: 201147 Title: A IIIb, randomized, open-label study of the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching to a fixed-dose

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE. i SUMMARY ZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS FINISHED PRODUCT: ACTIVE INGREDIENT: ACCOLATE zafirlukast (ZD9188) Trial title (number): A Dose-ranging, Safety and Efficacy Trial with Zafirlukast (ACCOLATE ) in the Treatment

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

RESPIRATORY CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE

RESPIRATORY CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE RESPIRATORY CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE Definitions of Asthma and COPD Asthma is due to inflammation of the air passages in the lungs and affects the sensitivity of the nerve endings in the airways so they

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Not available 100/6mcg 2 BD formoterol (Fostair MDI) 100/6mcg 33

Not available 100/6mcg 2 BD formoterol (Fostair MDI) 100/6mcg 33 COMMISSIONING POLICY RECOMMENDATION TREATMENT ADVISORY GROUP FLUTICASONE FUROATE/VILANTEROL COMBINATION INHALER - ASTHMA Policy agreed by Vale of York CCG (date) Drug, Treatment, Device name Fluticasone

More information

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1

mg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-

Study No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary- The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.

More information

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Scottish Medicines Consortium Scottish Medicines Consortium montelukast 10mg tablets (Singulair ) No. (185/05) Merck, Sharp & Dohme Ltd (MSD) New indication: for asthmatic patients in whom montelukast is indicated in asthma, montelukast

More information

measured Improvement in am PEFR FP vs BUD gave +11l/min FP vs BDP gave nonsignificant improvement in PEFR +3l/min FP: BUD ratio 1.

measured Improvement in am PEFR FP vs BUD gave +11l/min FP vs BDP gave nonsignificant improvement in PEFR +3l/min FP: BUD ratio 1. 1 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:29 Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.25: Budesonide vs Beclomethasone Different inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) flixotide propionate (FP) vs budesonide

More information

Who can get most benefit

Who can get most benefit Who can get most benefit from tiotropium in asthma? Y-M. Oh Asan Medical Center Univ. of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul, Korea Tiotripium for Asthma 1 New in GINA 2015 Add-on tiotropium by soft-mist inhaler

More information

3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM

3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM 3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM 3.01 ANTIASTHMATICS 3.01a BETA 2 AGONIST ASTHMA, CHRONIC BRONCHITIS & EMPHYSEMA Salbutamol Inhaler 100ug/dose [Albuterol] (Ventolin) Salbutamol Sulphate Respirator Solution 0.5% (5mg/ml),

More information