RARE-Bestpractices Conference
|
|
- Bertha Neal
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RARE-Bestpractices Conference 24 November 2016, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy Avoiding waste in production, design and conduct of studies and reporting evidence on rare diseases Philippe Ravaud 1
2 Lack of data sharing? Individual participant data meta-analysis? Personalized medicine? Subgroups analysis? Prognosis studies? Research waste 2
3 Avoiding the waste of research Good Research Question? yes No Relevant Methods? Yes No yes Publication? Adequate Reporting? No 85% of research is wasted Yes No 1. Chalmers et al, 2009, Lancet 3
4 Waste of research related to bias and/or poor reporting 205 Cochrane reviews included 1286 trials included in the metaanalysis for the main outcome Yordanov, BMJ (16%) trials at low risk of bias 523 (41%) trials at unclear risk of bias Waste of research related to poor reporting 556 (43%) trials at high risk of bias Waste of research related to poor planning Most of trials with high risk of bias can be improved by simple and cheap changes in methods. 4
5 Waste of Research in clinical trials Waste can occur at all stages of research Planning Conducting Analysis Reporting Archiving and Datasharing 5
6 Waste of Research Planning Phase Bad research question (a question impossible to answer) Reinventing the wheel or lagging far behind other researchers A question that has already been answered by others (or is going to be soon answered) Trials related to this question are already completed and going to be published 6
7 Visiting of CT.gov is not optional but mandatory 81 for Retinoblastoma 7
8 Waste of Research Planning Phase Inadequate sample size Badly selected study population (selection criteria are too restrictive or too broad, ) Inappropriate follow-up time (too short) Imprecise interventions (e.g., that could not be reproduced mainly for non pharmacological treatments) 8
9 Waste of Research Planning Phase Inadequate methods leading to trials with high risk of bias (blinding...) Inappropriate endpoints (surrogate endpoints, different from those included in the core outcome set relevant for the studied disease (COMET Initiative)) 9
10 Waste of Research in clinical trials Planning Conducting Analysis Reporting Archiving and Datasharing 10
11 Waste of Research Conducting Phase Overestimating recruitment capacities, which leads to unfeasible trials Waste of resources (time, money) Too much data collected Unnecessary heavy monitoring 11
12 Waste of Research in clinical trials Planning Conducting Analysis Reporting and posting Archiving and Datasharing 12
13 Authors, editors and publishers all have ethical obligations with regard to the publication of the results of research. Authors have a duty to make publicly available the results of their research on human subjects and are accountable for the completeness and accuracy of their reports. 13
14 Waste of Research at Reporting Stage No publication at all Publication as an abstract only 50 % of abstracts are not published Delayed publication Poor (incomplete) reporting: - methods - results (selective outcome reporting) Unfair reporting (SPIN) 14
15 FDA Amendment Act US Federal law enacted in 2007 mandates registration and results reporting for clinical trials of drugs, biological products and devices at clinicaltrial.gov Study sponsors or PI are required to report summary results information within 1 year of completing data collection for the prespecified primary outcome Same regulation in EU taking effect in
16 22 22,233 studies with results 16
17 Availability of Results of Trials on Rare Diseases Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov 1,531 rare diseases with at least 1 study registered at CT.gov completed between January 2009 and December completed phase 3 or 4 trials assessing drugs 69% were RCTs 62% were single country trials 39 % were single center trials For each trial we systematically assessed wether results were published and/or posted on CT.gov Dechartres et al, JAMA internal medicine
18 Availability of Results of Trials on Rare Diseases Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov At 36 months, results were posted at clinicaltrials.gov for 35% of trials (95% CI, 32%-38%), published in journals for 47% (95% CI, 43%-51%), Overall, results were publicly available only for 63% (95% CI, 59%-66%). Among the 325 trials likely to be subject to the FDAAA, 220 (68%) had results posted at clinicaltrials.gov: 4% (95% CI, 2%- 6%) had results posted at 12 months 57% (95% CI, 51%- 63%) at 36 months. 18
19 Waste of Research in clinical trials Planning Conducting Analysis Reporting Archiving and Datasharing 19
20 Improving Data-Sharing Clinical data are too precious to be analyzed Only once With potentially inappropriate methods and strategic choices of analysis more or less biased By only one team Without being checked by another team Without being able to pool them with other data An inevitable evolution towards massive, systematic, and imposed data sharing 20
21 Conclusion Waste of Research is extremely common for any diseases including rare diseases Waste of Research is largely avoidable Without a collective awakening and effort (clinicians, trialists, methodologists, funders, editors, reviewers) this waste will perpetuate 21
22 22
Why published medical research may not be good for your health
Why published medical research may not be good for your health Doug Altman EQUATOR Network and Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford 2 Reliable evidence Clinical practice and public health
More informationAvoiding common errors in research reporting:
Avoiding common errors in research reporting: Increasing usability (and potential impact) of your research Iveta Simera Outline Common reporting deficiencies in published research Particularly those limiting
More informationSpin in research publications
EQUATOR Network seminar Spin in research publications Isabelle Boutron Center of Clinical Epidemiology French Cochrane center Hôtel Dieu Hospital 1 Transposition of research results Research Clinical practice
More informationRole of evidence from observational studies in the process of health care decision making
Role of evidence from observational studies in the process of health care decision making Jan van der Meulen Health Services Research Unit London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Clinical Effectiveness
More informationDemographics, Subgroup Analyses, and Statistical Considerations in Cluster Randomized Trials
Demographics, Subgroup Analyses, and Statistical Considerations in Cluster Randomized Trials Monique L. Anderson, MD MHS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiology Duke Clinical Research Institute
More informationAssessing the risk of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews
Assessing the risk of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews Kerry Dwan (kdwan@liv.ac.uk) Jamie Kirkham (jjk@liv.ac.uk) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Doug G Altman, Carrol Gamble, Paula R Williamson Funding:
More informationThe QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews
The QUOROM Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of systematic reviews David Moher 1, Alessandro Liberati 2, Douglas G Altman 3, Jennifer Tetzlaff 1 for the QUOROM Group
More informationThe importance of good reporting of medical research. Doug Altman. Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford
The importance of good reporting of medical research Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford 1 Why reporting matters CONSORT and other reporting guidelines EQUATOR Network Other
More informationSystematic Reviews. Simon Gates 8 March 2007
Systematic Reviews Simon Gates 8 March 2007 Contents Reviewing of research Why we need reviews Traditional narrative reviews Systematic reviews Components of systematic reviews Conclusions Key reference
More informationOther potential bias. Isabelle Boutron French Cochrane Centre Bias Method Group University Paris Descartes
Other potential bias Isabelle Boutron French Cochrane Centre Bias Method Group University Paris Descartes 1 Outlines RoB tool for specific design Cross over trial Cluster randomized controlled trials Mono
More informationHow to Conduct a Meta-Analysis
How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis Faculty Development and Diversity Seminar ludovic@bu.edu Dec 11th, 2017 Periodontal disease treatment and preterm birth We conducted a metaanalysis of randomized controlled
More informationCochrane Bone, Joint & Muscle Trauma Group How To Write A Protocol
A p r i l 2 0 0 8 Cochrane Bone, Joint & Muscle Trauma Group How To Write A Protocol This booklet was originally produced by the Cochrane Renal Group to make the whole process of preparing a protocol as
More informationSchool of Dentistry. What is a systematic review?
School of Dentistry What is a systematic review? Screen Shot 2012-12-12 at 09.38.42 Where do I find the best evidence? The Literature Information overload 2 million articles published a year 20,000 biomedical
More informationEQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines
EQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines Doug Altman The EQUATOR Network Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK Key principles of research publications A published research
More informationDeterminants of quality: Factors that lower or increase the quality of evidence
Determinants of quality: Factors that lower or increase the quality of evidence GRADE Workshop CBO, NHG and Dutch Cochrane Centre CBO, April 17th, 2013 Outline The GRADE approach: step by step Factors
More informationThe Role and Importance of Clinical Trial Registries and Results Databases
The Role and Importance of Clinical Trial Registries and Results Databases March 2014 Rebecca J. Williams, Pharm.D., MPH Assistant Director, ClinicalTrials.gov National Library of Medicine, National Institutes
More informationTiago Villanueva MD Associate Editor, The BMJ. 9 January Dear Dr. Villanueva,
Tiago Villanueva MD Associate Editor, The BMJ 9 January 2018 Dear Dr. Villanueva, Thank you for your thoughtful re-review of our Manuscript (BMJ.2017.041528) entitled "Immune-related Toxicities in PD-1
More informationStudy protocol v. 1.0 Systematic review of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as a surrogate endpoint in randomized controlled trials
Study protocol v. 1.0 Systematic review of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as a surrogate endpoint in randomized controlled trials Harm Jan de Grooth, Jean Jacques Parienti, [to be determined],
More informationTransparency and accuracy in reporting health research
Transparency and accuracy in reporting health research Doug Altman The EQUATOR Network Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK Transparency and value Research only has value if Study methods have
More informationJamie Kirkham (University of Liverpool)
A random walk through outcomes based research for healthcare Jamie Kirkham (University of Liverpool) Acknowledgements: Doug Altman Mike Clarke Carrol Gamble Richard Riley Paula Williamson Why are outcomes
More informationReducing waste in research
Reducing waste in research Paul Glasziou, Bond University www.crebp.net.au Lancet Adding Value, Reducing Waste 2014 www.researchwaste.net Five stages of waste in research http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/01/14/paul-glasziou-and-iain-chalmers-is-
More informationCEU screening programme: Overview of common errors & good practice in Cochrane intervention reviews
CEU screening programme: Overview of common errors & good practice in Cochrane intervention reviews Since September 2013, the CEU has been responsible for pre-publication screening of new intervention
More informationThe effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments used in the "real world"
Medizinische Fakultät The effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments used in the "real world" Daniel Kotz, PhD 11 March 2015 Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Maastricht University University College
More informationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled
More informationStatistical Analysis Plans
Statistical Analysis Plans PROFESSOR CARROL GAMBLE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL Clinical Trials Lots of different types of clinical trials Various interventions Pharmaceutical/drugs regulated Regulated environment
More informationEmpirical evidence on sources of bias in randomised controlled trials: methods of and results from the BRANDO study
Empirical evidence on sources of bias in randomised controlled trials: methods of and results from the BRANDO study Jonathan Sterne, University of Bristol, UK Acknowledgements: Tony Ades, Bodil Als-Nielsen,
More informationDissemination experiences from CONSORT and other reporting guidelines
Dissemination experiences from CONSORT and other reporting guidelines Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford EQUATOR Network [Altman and Goodman, JAMA 1994] 2 Passive
More informationThe SPIRIT Initiative: Defining standard protocol items
The SPIRIT Initiative: Defining standard protocol items October 11, 2012 An-Wen Chan, MD DPhil Women s College Hospital & Research Institute University of Toronto Importance of trial protocols Trial registries
More informationCritical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death. Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto
Critical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto Goal To provide practitioners with a systematic approach to evaluating a meta analysis
More informationEvidence-Based Medicine and Publication Bias Desmond Thompson Merck & Co.
Evidence-Based Medicine and Publication Bias Desmond Thompson Merck & Co. Meta-Analysis Defined A meta-analysis is: the statistical combination of two or more separate studies In other words: overview,
More informationUser s guide to the checklist of items assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological treatment
User s guide to the checklist of items assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological treatment Reviewers will answer the following items, taking into account the data repted
More informationQuality of meta-analyses and why they sometimes lead to different conclusions
Quality of meta-analyses and why they sometimes lead to different conclusions Jean-Pierre Pignon, MD, PhD Service de Biostatistique et d Epidémiologie, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer metaanalysis platform,
More informationAdvancing Use of Patient Preference Information as Scientific Evidence in Medical Product Evaluation Day 2
Advancing Use of Patient Preference Information as Scientific Evidence in Medical Product Evaluation Day 2 Theresa Mullin, PhD Director, Office of Strategic Programs FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and
More information5-ASA for the treatment of Crohn s disease DR. STEPHEN HANAUER FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, IL, USA
5-ASA for the treatment of Crohn s disease DR. STEPHEN HANAUER FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, IL, USA Background RCTs investigating the efficacy of aminosalicylates for
More informationControlled Trials. Spyros Kitsiou, PhD
Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials Spyros Kitsiou, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences College of Applied Health Sciences University of
More informationWhat is the Cochrane Collaboration? What is a systematic review?
1 What is the Cochrane Collaboration? What is a systematic review? Archie Cochrane (1909-1988) It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organised a critical summary, by specialty
More informationCopyright GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD
GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS, MCMASTER UNIVERSITY Nancy Santesso,
More informationWashington, DC, November 9, 2009 Institute of Medicine
Holger Schünemann, MD, PhD Chair, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics Michael Gent Chair in Healthcare Research McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Washington, DC, November 9, 2009 Institute
More informationLow-adherence to recommendations from an authoritative Consensus Conference on trials in cgvhd led to overestimation of treatment effect
Low-adherence to recommendations from an authoritative Consensus Conference on trials in cgvhd led to overestimation of treatment effect Giovanni Pomponio, Jacopo Olivieri*, Lucia Manfredi, Laura Postacchini,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SPLIT Universitas Studiorum Spalatensis. SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Facultas Medica SHELLY MELISSA PRANIĆ
UNIVERSITY OF SPLIT Universitas Studiorum Spalatensis SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Facultas Medica SHELLY MELISSA PRANIĆ ADEQUACY OF REGISTRATION AND RESULTS REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CLINICALTRIALS.GOV
More informationGarbage in - garbage out? Impact of poor reporting on the development of systematic reviews
Garbage in - garbage out? Impact of poor reporting on the development of systematic reviews ACT now: EQUATOR Scientific Symposium Freiburg, 11 October 2012 Erik von Elm, MD MSc FMH Cochrane Switzerland
More informationAlpha blockers have no role in renal colic
Alpha blockers have no role in renal colic HARRY WINKLER Director, section of Endourology Kidney stone center Dept.of Urology Sheba Medical Center Financial and Other Disclosures Off-label use of drugs,
More informationWeb appendix (published as supplied by the authors)
Web appendix (published as supplied by the authors) In this appendix we provide motivation and considerations for assessing the risk of bias for each of the items included in the Cochrane Collaboration
More informationRace and Ethnicity Reporting in Clinical Research and Its Role In Pragmatic Clinical Trials February 28, 2014
Race and Ethnicity Reporting in Clinical Research and Its Role In Pragmatic Clinical Trials February 28, 2014 Monique Anderson, MD Medical Instructor Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical
More informationBandolier. Professional. Independent evidence-based health care ON QUALITY AND VALIDITY. Quality and validity. May Clinical trial quality
Bandolier Professional Independent evidence-based health care ON QUALITY AND VALIDITY If studies are not done properly, any results they produce will be worthless. We call this validity. What constitutes
More informationReport on WHO Policy Statements
Report on WHO Policy Statements Christopher Gilpin TB Diagnostics and Laboratory Strengthening Unit Secretariat, Global Laboratory Initiative Stop TB Department, WHO Geneva New Diagnostics Working Group
More informationIntroduction to systematic reviews/metaanalysis
Introduction to systematic reviews/metaanalysis Hania Szajewska The Medical University of Warsaw Department of Paediatrics hania@ipgate.pl Do I needknowledgeon systematicreviews? Bastian H, Glasziou P,
More informationIs therapy a realistic option at the present time? Felipe Fregni LEASE DO NOT COPY. Spauding Neuromodulation Center Harvard Medical School
Is therapy a realistic option at the present time? Felipe Fregni Spauding Neuromodulation Center Harvard Medical School Arguments supporting therapeutic use of tdcs Questions to be answered: Is there a
More informationresearch methods & reporting
1 Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GS 2 Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6UD 3 Population, Community and Behavioural
More informationRegulatory Hurdles for Drug Approvals
Regulatory Hurdles for Drug Approvals William R. Hiatt, MD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology University of Colorado School of Medicine President, CPC Clinical Research 25 min Conflicts CPC Clinical Research
More informationClinicalTrials.gov a programmer s perspective
PhUSE 2009, Basel ClinicalTrials.gov a programmer s perspective Ralf Minkenberg Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG PhUSE 2009, Basel 1 Agenda ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results disclosure Initial
More informationAssociation of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting
Phillips et al. Trials (2017) 18:333 DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2068-3 REVIEW Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting Adam T. Phillips 1*, Nihar R.
More informationSystematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis in Kidney Transplantation
Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis in Kidney Transplantation Greg Knoll MD MSc Associate Professor of Medicine Medical Director, Kidney Transplantation University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital KRESCENT
More informationpc oral surgery international
pc oral surgery international Evidence-based TMJ Surgery 2013 Professor Paul Coulthard BDS FGDP(UK) MDS FDSRCS FDSRCS(OS) PhD evidence-based practice? - the integration of best research evidence with clinical
More informationVarenicline and cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric events: Do Benefits outweigh risks?
Varenicline and cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric events: Do Benefits outweigh risks? Sonal Singh M.D., M.P.H, Johns Hopkins University Presented by: Sonal Singh, MD MPH September 19, 2012 1 CONFLICTS
More informationJournal Club PowerPoint Template. A Question of Therapy RCT
Journal Club PowerPoint Template A Question of Therapy RCT 1 EBM Process Ask a well built (focused) clinical question Search for the best evidence to answer the question Critically appraise the evidence
More informationLearning objectives. Examining the reliability of published research findings
Examining the reliability of published research findings Roger Chou, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine and Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology Scientific
More informationSystematic reviews: From evidence to recommendation. Marcel Dijkers, PhD, FACRM Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Systematic reviews: From evidence to recommendation Session 2 - June 18, 2014 Going beyond design, going beyond intervention: The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Clinical Practice Guideline process
More informationJAMA. 2011;305(24): Nora A. Kalagi, MSc
JAMA. 2011;305(24):2556-2564 By Nora A. Kalagi, MSc Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number one cause of mortality and morbidity world wide Reducing high blood cholesterol which is a risk factor for
More informationThe role of meta-analysis in the evaluation of the effects of early nutrition on neurodevelopment
Note: for non-commercial purposes only The role of meta-analysis in the evaluation of the effects of early nutrition on neurodevelopment Hania Szajewska The Medical University of Warsaw Department of Paediatrics
More informationMeta-analyses: analyses:
Meta-analyses: analyses: how do they help, and when can they not? Lee Hooper Senior Lecturer in research synthesis & nutrition l.hooper@uea.ac.uk 01603 591268 Aims Systematic Reviews Discuss the scientific
More informationPediatric Anti-bacterial and Anti-fungal Trials from 2007 to 2015: A Systematic Review of ClinicalTrials.gov
Pediatric Anti-bacterial and Anti-fungal Trials from 2007 to 2015: A Systematic Review of ClinicalTrials.gov Joshua Thaden, MD, PhD Fellow, Infectious Diseases Duke University April 5, 2016 Objectives
More informationEVIDENCE SYNTHESIS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: ANIMAL STUDIES UNDER THE LENS
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: ANIMAL STUDIES UNDER THE LENS Paul Garner On behalf of the Cochrane infectious Diseases Group Editors And the Effective Health Care Research Programme Consortium Competing
More informationEvaluation Models STUDIES OF DIAGNOSTIC EFFICIENCY
2. Evaluation Model 2 Evaluation Models To understand the strengths and weaknesses of evaluation, one must keep in mind its fundamental purpose: to inform those who make decisions. The inferences drawn
More informationEffective Health Care Program
Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 108 Effective Health Care Program Migraine in Children: Preventive Pharmacologic Treatments Executive Summary Introduction The Agency for Healthcare Research and
More informationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews
PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus non-stenting balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs [Cochrane Protocol]
More informationApplying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma
Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma Lisa Hartling 1 *, Kenneth Bond 1, Ben Vandermeer 1, Jennifer
More informationStatement Of. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores. For. United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control.
Statement Of The National Association of Chain Drug Stores For United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control Hearing on: Improving Management 10:00 a.m. 226 Dirksen Senate Office Building
More informationClinical Epidemiology for the uninitiated
Clinical epidemiologist have one foot in clinical care and the other in clinical practice research. As clinical epidemiologists we apply a wide array of scientific principles, strategies and tactics to
More informationMeta-analysis: Methodology
Meta-analysis: Methodology Example: Assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of new generation BCR-ABL TKIs in patients with CML Haguet Hélène 04/03/2016 Meta-analysis = statistical combination of results
More informationMethodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews Version 2.1, 8 December 2011
Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) Methodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews Version 2.1, 8 December 2011 Jackie Chandler, Rachel Churchill,
More informationTESTING TREATMENTS SYNTHESIZING INFORMATION FROM RESEARCH
TESTING TREATMENTS Chapter 8, 8.2 TESTING TREATMENTS SYNTHESIZING INFORMATION FROM RESEARCH More than a century ago, the president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Lord Rayleigh,
More informationSystematic Review & Course outline. Lecture (20%) Class discussion & tutorial (30%)
Systematic Review & Meta-analysisanalysis Ammarin Thakkinstian, Ph.D. Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital Tel: 02-201-1269, 02-201-1762 Fax: 02-2011284
More informationDefending the integrity of medical knowledge: an editor s perspective
Defending the integrity of medical knowledge: an editor s perspective Fiona Godlee Editor, BMJ Publication Ethics Seminar, Osaka, Japan September 22 2010 Robert Merton The normative structure of science
More informationPolymedication in nursing home. Graziano Onder Centro Medicina dell Invecchiamento Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome - Italy
Polymedication in nursing home Graziano Onder Centro Medicina dell Invecchiamento Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome - Italy Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) 4156 residents
More informationThursday, April 23. Incorporating ClinicalTrials.gov Into Patient Education and Care Coordination. Session 1:30 3 pm Valencia BC
Session 1:30 3 pm Valencia BC Incorporating ClinicalTrials.gov Into Patient Education and Care Coordination Clinical trials play a significant role in improving cancer treatment, symptom management, and
More informationCritical Appraisal Practicum. Fabio Di Bello Medical Implementation Manager
Critical Appraisal Practicum Fabio Di Bello Medical Implementation Manager fdibello@ebsco.com What we ll talk about today: DynaMed process for appraising randomized trials and writing evidence summaries
More informationThe Royal College of Pathologists Journal article evaluation questions
The Royal College of Pathologists Journal article evaluation questions Previous exam questions Dorrian CA, Toole, BJ, Alvarez-Madrazo S, Kelly A, Connell JMC, Wallace AM. A screening procedure for primary
More informationDiabetes history. Intervention (9.3) 2.8(4.5) non-smbg (9.1) 2.8(3.7) 5.8(5.8) no-smbg ( )* usual care (2.0-6.
Table S1 Characteristics of the included studies Study Country Intervention group Intervention Sample size Age Diabetes history Control group Intervention Sample size Age Diabetes history Followup Outcomes
More informationJohn Saldanha Regulatory Requirements: Precision and Accuracy of Quantitative NAT Tests XXII SoGAT Meeting, April, 2011
John Saldanha Regulatory Requirements: Precision and Accuracy of Quantitative NAT Tests XXII SoGAT Meeting, 14 15 April, 2011 Istituto Superiore di Sanita (ISS), Rome, Italy 2 June 2011 page 1 2011 Roche
More informationMethodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews Version 2.3, 02 December 2013
Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) Methodological standards for the conduct of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews Version 2.3, 02 December 2013 Jackie Chandler, Rachel
More informationImproving Return on Public Health Investments in Disasters with Evidence Synthesis
Improving Return on Public Health Investments in Disasters with Evidence Synthesis Karen A. Robinson Johns Hopkins University Evidence Aid 17 Nov 2016 Evidence Synthesis Formal methods for summarizing
More informationClinically Important Outcomes in ICU research
Clinically Important Outcomes in ICU research Michaël Chassé, MD, PhD, FRCPC Intensivist, Centre Hospitalier de l Université de Montréal Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University
More informationPurpose. Study Designs. Objectives. Observational Studies. Analytic Studies
Purpose Study Designs H.S. Teitelbaum, DO, PhD, MPH, FAOCOPM AOCOPM Annual Meeting Introduce notions of study design Clarify common terminology used with description and interpretation of information collected
More informationELEVEN REASONS WHY S IS BAD PUBLIC POLICY. Clinton Admin. FY00 budget request for FDA tobacco regulation was $34 million.
ELEVEN REASONS WHY S. 2461 IS BAD PUBLIC POLICY 1. Creates New Bureaucracy. Clinton Admin. FY00 budget request for FDA tobacco regulation was $34 million. S.2461 includes a tax increase of $300 million
More informationCochrane Breast Cancer Group
Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Version and date: V3.2, September 2013 Intervention Cochrane Protocol checklist for authors This checklist is designed to help you (the authors) complete your Cochrane Protocol.
More informationLorne A. Becker MD Emeritus Professor SUNY Upstate Medical University. Co-Chair, Cochrane Collaboration Steering Group
Lorne A. Becker MD Emeritus Professor SUNY Upstate Medical University Co-Chair, Cochrane Collaboration Steering Group Many different types Vary in Complexity Trustworthiness of conclusions http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspscopd.htm
More informationLess is more: Guidelines
ESIM Summer School June 20 Friday, 2014 Less is more: Guidelines Primiano Iannone, MD Head of Emergency Department Ospedali del Tigullio, Lavagna (GE) Italy layout What is a clinical guideline Why do we
More informationCon - SMBG Should be the Standard of Care in All Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
JUNE 9 13, 2006 WASHINGTON, DC Con - SMBG Should be the Standard of Care in All Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Antonio Nicolucci, MD Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology Consorzio Mario
More informationModels for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors
Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors Nicky Welton Thanks to: Tony Ades, John Carlin, Doug Altman, Jonathan Sterne, Ross Harris RSS Avon Local Group Meeting,
More informationAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Developing Drugs for Treatment Guidance for Industry
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Developing Drugs for Treatment Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding
More informationErrors may lurk in our best theories. It is the responsibility of the professional to search for these errors Sir Karl Popper ( )
Arthur Felice, MD, MSc, FRCS Ed, FEBS Errors may lurk in our best theories. It is the responsibility of the professional to search for these errors Sir Karl Popper (1902 2001) 1 2 Exploiting interfaces:
More informationARCHE Risk of Bias (ROB) Guidelines
Types of Biases and ROB Domains ARCHE Risk of Bias (ROB) Guidelines Bias Selection Bias Performance Bias Detection Bias Attrition Bias Reporting Bias Other Bias ROB Domain Sequence generation Allocation
More informationClinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study Review in ANDA Submissions. Ying Fan, Ph.D.
Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study Review in ANDA Submissions Ying Fan, Ph.D. 1 Disclaimer This presentation constitutes an informal communication that represents the best judgment of the speaker at
More informationStatistical aspects of surgery in clinical trials. Laurence Collette, PhD Statistics Department, EORTC, Brussels (BE)
Statistical aspects of surgery in clinical trials Laurence Collette, PhD Statistics Department, EORTC, Brussels (BE) Employee of EORTC, non profit organization No conflict of interest to declare Surgery
More informationCritical appraisal: Systematic Review & Meta-analysis
Critical appraisal: Systematic Review & Meta-analysis Atiporn Ingsathit MD.PhD. Section for Clinical Epidemiology and biostatistics Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University What is a
More informationImproving Medical Statistics and Interpretation of Clinical Trials
Improving Medical Statistics and Interpretation of Clinical Trials 1 ALLHAT Trial & ALLHAT Meta-Analysis Critique Table of Contents ALLHAT Trial Critique- Overview p 2-4 Critique Of The Flawed Meta-Analysis
More informationThe Research Registryâ Guidebook
The Research Registryâ Guidebook March 2017 Contents Section 1: Registering a study on the Research Registryâ 3 An Introduction to the Research Registryâ 3 Support and endorsements 3 Data security 3 What
More informationAssessing risk of bias
Assessing risk of bias Norwegian Research School for Global Health Atle Fretheim Research Director, Norwegian Institute of Public Health Professor II, Uiniversity of Oslo Goal for the day We all have an
More informationHealth authorities are asking for PRO assessment in dossiers From rejection to recognition of PRO
UNDERSTANDING AND ADDRESSING POTENTIAL BIAS IN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES FROM CLINICAL TRIALS ISPOR Barcelona Workshop Tuesday 13 November 14:00-15:00 Prof. Olivier Chassany EA 7334, Patient-Centered Outcomes
More information