Evidence Based Medicine

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Evidence Based Medicine"

Transcription

1 Hamadan University of medical sciences School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology Evidence Based Medicine Amin Doosti-Irani, PhD in Epidemiology 10 March

2 Outlines An introduction to evidence based medicine (EBM) Formulate a research question and PICO Teamwork Principle and concepts in the methodology of clinical articles Critical appraisal and quality assessment of clinical articles Teamwork Principles and concepts of diagnostic test Critical appraisal and quality assessment of diagnostic test articles Teamwork and discussion 10 March

3 An introduction to EBM The term "evidence based medicine" was coined at McMaster Medical School in Canada in the 1980s Definitions EBM is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. EMB is the process of systematically finding, appraising, and using contemporaneous research findings as the basis for clinical decisions. 10 March

4 An introduction to EBM Good doctors use both: individual clinical expertise and the best available external evidence, and neither alone is enough. Without clinical expertise, practice risks becoming tyrannized by evidence, for even excellent external evidence may be inapplicable to or inappropriate for an individual patient. Without current best evidence, practice risks becoming rapidly out of date, to the detriment of patients. Systematic reviews provide strong evidence to underpin EBM. 10 March

5 Components of evidence-based medicine 10 March

6 Components of evidence-based medicine Clinical expertise Best available evidence Patient values & expectation Improved patient outcome 10 March

7 Five Ways Evidence-Based Medicine Adds Value to Health Systems 1.Helps clinicians stay current on standardized, evidence-based protocols. 2.Uses near real-time data to make care decisions. 3.Improves transparency, accountability, and value. 4.Improves quality of care. 5.Improves outcomes. 10 March

8 An introduction to EBM Evidence based medicine is not restricted to randomized trials and meta-analyses. It involves tracking down the best external evidence with which to answer our clinical questions. 10 March

9 An introduction to EBM To find out about the accuracy of a diagnostic test, we need to find proper cross sectional studies, not a randomized trial. For a question about prognosis, we need proper follow up studies of patients and sometimes the evidence we need will come from the basic sciences such as genetics or immunology. 10 March

10 An introduction to EBM It is when asking questions about therapy that we should try to avoid the non-experimental approaches, since these routinely lead to false positive conclusions about efficacy. Because the randomized trial, and especially the systematic review of several randomized trials, is so much more likely to inform us and so much less likely to mislead us, it has become the "gold standard" for judging whether a treatment does more good than harm. 10 March

11 We need to EBM. Why? 10 March

12 Study designs study Qualitative Quantitative Observational Interventional Descriptive Analytic Randomized control trial Field trial Community trial Case series Ecologic Crosssectional* Case-control Cohort 10 March

13 Observational studies Type of study Other name Unit of study Observational studies Descriptive Case-report Patients Case-series Patients Analytic Ecologic Correlation Population Cross-sectional* Prevalence Individuals Case-control Case-reference Individuals Cohort Incidence (follow-up) Individuals 10 March

14 Interventional studies Type of study Other name Unit of study Interventional Experimental studies Randomized controlled trial Clinical trial Patients Field trial Community trial Healthy people Communities 10 March

15 Case series Key characteristics Description of patients Description of some new patients with unknown sever acute respiratory illness in 2002 that became known as SARS. 10 March

16 Ecologic studies The units of observation is geographically defined populations such as counties or regions within a country Mean values for both a given postulated risk factor and the outcome of interest The analysis of ecological data involves plotting the risk factor and outcome values for all observation units to assess whether a relationship is evident. 10 March

17 Example Ten year coronary death rates of the cohorts from the seven countries The higher average saturated fat intakes the higher death rates 10 March

18 Ecological fallacy Aggregate Data Individual Inference Ecological Fallacy 10 March

19 Cross-sectional studies In a cross-sectional study design, a sample of (or the total) reference population is examined at a given point in time. it consists of taking a "snapshot" of a cohort by recording information on disease outcomes and exposures at a single point in time 10 March

20 Participants Cross-sectional studies Only prevalence Prevalence+ measure of association Unexposed without disease Unexposed with disease Exposed without disease Exposed with disease 10 March

21 Cross-sectional studies Key characteristics Direct measurement of prevalence Cross-sectional studies are relevant to public health planning Disadvantages It is difficult to establish the temporal sequence It is usually not possible to determine incidence, the use of prevalence as a proxy of frequency may distort the exposuredisease relationship 10 March

22 Case-control studies a case-control study usually compares cases (diseased individuals) and controls (usually non diseased individuals) with respect to their level of exposure to a suspected risk factor. 10 March

23 Types of Case-Control Study Case-control designs Case-Based Within a Defined Cohort Nested casecontrol Casecrossover Case-cohort 10 March

24 Design of a case-control studies Exposed Cases Unexposed Participants Exposed Controls Unexposed 10 March

25 Design of a case-control studies Level of exposure (risk factor) is compared in: cases (diseased individuals) controls (usually non-diseased individuals) Dichotomous risk factors >> odds ratio. Continuous risk factor >> mean difference 10 March

26 Critical issues affecting the validity of case-control data. Cases and controls originate from the same source population different reference population having similar relevant characteristics Otherwise selection bias may ensue Losses may affect the comparability of cases and controls. 10 March

27 Critical issues affecting the validity of case-control data Selection bias may occur even if cases and controls are from the same "hypothetical" cohort; this happens when "losses" occurring before the study groups are selected affect their comparability. 10 March

28 Potential Biases in Case-control Studies Selection bias Sources of Cases Selection of Controls Information bias Problems of Recall Limitations in Recall Recall Bias 10 March

29 Cohort studies Participants Exposed Unexposed Disease No disease Disease No dosease 10 March

30 Cohort studies 10 March

31 Potential Biases in Cohort Studies Selection Biases Nonparticipation Nonresponse lost to follow-up Information Biases If the quality and extent of information obtained is different for exposed persons than for no exposed persons, If the person who decides whether disease has developed in each subject also knows whether that subject was exposed, if that person is aware of the hypothesis being tested 10 March

32 Participants Randomized controlled trial New treatment Improved Not improved Current treatment Improved Not improved 10 March

33 Randomized controlled trial Key characteristics of RCT Randomization To generate comparative groups To enable valid statistical tests Concealment Blinding Open label (unbinding) Single blinding (patients only) Double blinding (patients and investigators) Triple blinding (patients and investigators and Monitoring investigators) 10 March

34 Randomized controlled trial Protocol deviation Patient ineligible Wrong treatment Competing events Noncompliance Loss to follow up Missing data 10 March

35 Randomized controlled trial Data analysis Baseline data analysis Main analysis Protocol deviation Intention to treat per protocol approaches Adherers only Intention to Treat: 1&2 vs 3&4 Adherers only: 2 versus 4 As treated: 1&4 versus 2&3 As treated 10 March

36 Ways of Expressing the Results of Randomized Trials 10 March

37 Review Types of review article Narrative review SR of Qualitative studies Meta-synthesis Systematic review (SR) SR observational studies May led to a Metaanalysis SR of Quantitative studies Two interventions May led to a metaanalysis SR interventional studies More than two interventions May led to a network metaanalysis 10 March

38 Systematic review A systematic review is a research article that identifies relevant studies, appraises their quality and summarizes their results using a scientific methodology. 10 March

39 Steps of a systematic review Step 1 Framing questions Step 2 Identifying relevant literature Step 3 Assessing quality of the literature Step 4 Summarizing the evidence Step 5 Interpreting the findings 10 March

40 Meta-analysis The term meta-analysis is not synonymous with a systematic review. It is only a part of the systematic review. It is a statistical technique for combining the results of a number of individual studies to produce a summary result. Some publications called metaanalysis are not systematic reviews. 10 March

41 Network meta-analysis When several treatment options are available, a series of individual meta analyses provides only partial information A network meta-analysis is a simultaneous analysis of the data from all of these randomized trials. With a network meta analysis, the relative effectiveness of 2 treatments can be estimated even if no studies directly compare them. 10 March

42 Level of evidence 10 March

43 10 March

44 Steps of EBM Five steps in evidence based medicine Formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's Problem Search the literature for relevant clinical articles Evaluate (critically appraise) the evidence Implement useful findings in clinical practice Assess your performance 10 March

45 Steps of EBM Step 5 Step 1 Ask a clinical question Step 2 Acquire the best evidence Step 3 Appraise the evidence Step 4 Apply the evidence Assess your performance 10 March

46 Types of questions Question Type of study How common is the problem? Prevalence Cross-sectional What is the causes of disease and their modes of operation Etiology Case control or cohort study Is early detection worthwhile? Screening Cross-sectional What will happen if we do nothing? Prognosis Cohort studies Does this intervention help? Treatment Randomized control trial What are the harms of an intervention? Adverse events Randomized control trial Is one intervention more cost-effective than another? Is the diagnostic test accurate? Diagnosis Diagnostic validation studies, Crosssectional Costeffectiveness Economic evaluation What will be quality of life of the patients? Quality of life Both qualitative & quantitative (cross-sectional) studies 10 March

47 Step 1: Ask a clinical question Formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's Problem Question components (PICOS) Populations Interventions (or exposures) Comparison Outcomes Study design 10 March

48 Template for asking answerable clinical questions Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Study design List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here Your completed clinical question 10 March

49 Formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's Problem 10 March

50 Formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's Problem An example question about clinical effectiveness Free form question: Which of the many available antimicrobial products improve healing in patients with chronic wounds? 10 March

51 Formulate a clear clinical question from a patient's Problem An example question about clinical effectiveness Structured question The population The interventions The outcomes The study design In adults with various forms of chronic wounds in an ambulatory setting.. would systemic or topical antimicrobial preparations.. improve wound healing? A comparative study that allocates subjects with chronic wounds to alternative therapeutic interventions of interest and determines the effect of the interventions on wound healing (e.g. randomized controlled trial). 10 March

52 An example question about etiology Structured question Free form question: Is exposure to benzodiazepines in pregnancy associated with malformations in the newborn baby? 10 March

53 An example question about etiology 10 March

54 An example question about etiology The population The exposures The outcomes The study designs In pregnant women.. does exposure to benzodiazepines during early pregnancy.. cause malformations in the newborn baby? A study that recruits women in early pregnancy, assesses their exposure to benzodiazepines, follows them up and examines their newborn babies to compare the rates of malformations among women with exposure and those without (cohort study). A study that retrospectively compares exposure to benzodiazepines in early pregnancy among women who have given birth to a child with malformation with those women who gave birth to a healthy child (case-control study). 10 March

55 An example question about test accuracy Free form question: Among postmenopausal women with abnormal vaginal bleeding, does pelvic ultrasound scan exclude uterine cancer accurately? 10 March

56 Structured question 10 March

57 Structured question The population The test The reference standard The study design In postmenopausal women, within a community setting, with vaginal bleeding.. does a uterine ultrasound scan test accurately predict.. histological diagnosis of uterine cancer? A study that recruits women from a relevant population, uses the test (scan) and a reference standard investigation to confirm or refute the presence of cancer (histology), and determines the accuracy with which the test identifies cancer 10 March

58 An example question about qualitative research Free form question: How does the experience of endometriosis impact on women s lives? 10 March

59 Structured question 10 March

60 Structured question The population The intervention The outcomes The study design In women with a confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis.. how does observation or treatment.. affect pain, social relationships and self-image? A study that narrates subjective experiences 10 March

61 An example question about an educational intervention Free form question: How does use of portfolios affect student learning in undergraduate (medical and nursing) education? 10 March

62 Structured question 10 March

63 Structured question The population The intervention The outcomes The study design Among undergraduate nursing or medical students.. does a portfolio, defined as a collection of evidence of student learning, a learning journal or diary, or a combination of these two elements.. improve knowledge and skills? A study that evaluates the educational effects of portfolios. 10 March

64 Steps of EBM Step 5 Step 1 Ask a clinical question Step 2 Acquire the best evidence Step 3 Appraise the evidence Step 4 Apply the evidence Assess your performance 10 March

65 Step 2 Acquire the best evidence 10 March

66 Template for designing a search strategy Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Study design List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here List concepts here #1:.. #5:.. #9:.. #13:.. #17:.. #2:.. #6:.. #10:.. #14:.. #18:.. #3:.. #7:.. #11:.. #15:.. #19:.. #4: #1 OR #2 OR #3 #8: #5 OR #6 OR #7 #12: #9 OR #10 OR #11 #16: #13 OR #14 OR #15 #20: #17 OR #18 OR #19 #21: (#4 AND #8 AND #12 AND #16 AND #20) 10 March

67 #1: Tuberculosis #2: Latent Tuberculosis Infection #3: #1 OR #2 #4: QuantiFERON #5: Interferon-gamma Release Test #6: Interferon-gamma Release Assay #7: Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay #8: IGRA #9: Tuberculin Test #10: Tuberculin #11: PPD-S #12: Skin Test #13: Mantoux tuberculin skin test #14: #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 #15: Kappa #16: Kappa-value #17: Kappa-statistic #18: Agreement #19: expected agreement #20: interobserver agreement #21: inter rater agreement #22: Predictive value test #23: Positive predictive value #24: Negative predictive value #25: Sensitivity #26: Specificity #27: #15 OR #16 OR #17 OR #18 OR #19 OR #20 OR #21 OR #22 OR #23 OR #24 OR #25 OR #26 #28: Observational Study #29: Cross-Sectional Study #30: Cross-Sectional Analysis #31: Cross Sectional Survey #32: Cohort Study #33: Retrospective Study #34: Prospective Study #35:#28 OR #29 OR #30 OR #31 OR #32 OR #33 OR #34 #36: Animal #37: (#3 AND #14 AND #27 AND #35) NOT #35 10 March

68 Think about what kind of evidence you need to answer your question: 1. Levels of evidence: what type of study would give you the best quality evidence for your question? 2. Secondary sources: is there a quality and relevance-filtered summary of evidence on your question, such as in ACP Journal Club or Clinical Evidence? 3. Systematic reviews: is there a systematic review in the Cochrane Library? 4. Bibliographic databases: in which database would you find relevant studies? 10 March

69 Levels of evidence: what type of study would give you the best quality evidence for your question? Try these first TRIP Database EBM Online Clinical Evidence Cochrane Library These sources will give you the best return on your precious time. 10 March

70 10 March

71 10 March

72 10 March

73 Secondary sources: is there a quality and relevance-filtered summary of evidence on your question, such as in ACP Journal Club or Clinical Evidence? Type Description Source Critically appraised topics (CATs) Evidence-based summaries Appraisals of evidence in response to clinical questions Reviews of the evidence around a specific clinical topic CATCrawler Journal clubs Your and your colleagues own collection Bandolier, Clinical Evidence ( Structured abstracts Appraisals of important clinical papers EBM Online, ACP Journal clubs, evidence-based journals Health technology assessments Appraisals of the evidence for a specific intervention Cochrane Library UK NHS HTA Programe Systematic reviews Review of all the evidence around a specific topic Cochrane Library 10 March

74 Can I trust this secondary source? Only if you can answer yes to all of the following: There are no conflict of interest It clearly states what question it addresses There is an explicit and evidence-based methodology behind finding, producing and checking the information. The source is reviewed and updated regularly 10 March

75 Primary sources Bibliographic databases: Medline Web of sciences Cochran collaboration Embase Scopus 10 March

76 PubMed 10 March

77 Web of sciences 10 March

78 Scopus 10 March

79 Embase 10 March

80 Cochrane library 10 March

81 BMJ best practice 10 March

82 Steps of EBM Step 5 Step 1 Ask a clinical question Step 2 Acquire the best evidence Step 3 Appraise the evidence Step 4 Apply the evidence Assess your performance 10 March

83 Appraise the evidence Questions that clinicians can ask when apprising evidence Dose the evidence improve decision-making or outcomes? clinical quality or patient safety? efficiency and lower costs? the care experience? access to health care services? 10 March

84 Appraise the evidence Critical appraisal of Guidelines Systematic reviews Diagnosis articles Articles on harm/etiology Prognosis studies Therapy articles Qualitative studies 10 March

85 Critical appraisal of guidelines 1. Scope and purpose of the guideline Does the guideline address a clear issue? Are the target users of the guideline clearly defined? 2. Methods Was there a comprehensive search for the evidence? Are the criteria for data extraction clearly described? Are the methods used for formulating the recommendations clearly described? Are the health benefits, side effects and risks of the interventions considered in formulating recommendations? 10 March

86 Critical appraisal of guidelines 3. Applicability Are different options for diagnosis and/ or treatment of the condition clearly presented? Are the key recommendations identifiable? 4. Conflicts of interest Is the guideline editorially independent from the funding body? Are the conflicts of interest of the developing members recorded? How up to date is the guideline? 10 March

87 Appraising systematic reviews Is the systematic review valid? Is it a systematic review of high-quality studies which are relevant to your question? Does the methods section adequately describe: a comprehensive search for all the relevant studies? how the reviewers assessed the validity of each study? Are the studies consistent, both clinically and statistically? 10 March

88 Appraising systematic reviews Are the results important? Are they clinically significant? Can the results help you? How precise are the results? 10 March

89 Appraising systematic reviews Three key features of a systematic review a strenuous effort to locate all original reports on the topic of interest critical evaluation of the reports conclusions are drawn based on a synthesis of studies which meet pre-set quality criteria 10 March

90 Appraising systematic reviews Is it a systematic review of the right type of studies which are relevant to your question? Only if: The review addresses a clearly defined question The review includes studies which also look at this question, The studies are the right design to address this question 10 March

91 Appraising systematic reviews Does the methods section describe how all the relevant trials were found and assessed? Search strategy hand searching of journals and searching for unpublished literature. Were any obvious databases missed? check the reference lists of articles and of textbooks contact experts Did they use an appropriate search strategy: were important subject terms missed? 10 March

92 Appraising systematic reviews Did the authors assess the trials validity? Publication bias What criteria were used to extract data from the studies? Again, it s helpful to think in terms of patient, intervention, outcome: Who were the study participants and how is their disease status defined? What intervention/s were given, how and in what setting? How were outcomes assessed? 10 March

93 Appraising systematic reviews Are the studies consistent, both clinically and statistically? Clinical heterogeneity use your clinical knowledge to decide whether the groups of patients, interventions, and outcome measures were similar enough to merit combining their results Statistical heterogeneity Check the statistical tests for assessing the heterogeneity 10 March

94 Appraising systematic reviews Are the results important? Is this odds ratio or relative risk clinically important? How precise are the results? The statistical significance of the results Confidence intervals for all results 10 March

95 Appraising systematic reviews 10 March

96 10 March

97 10 March

98 Appraising diagnosis articles Is the study valid? 1. Was there a clearly defined question? 2. Was the presence or absence of the target disorder confirmed with a reference standard? (Gold Standard) Was this comparison independent from and blind to the study test results? 3. Was the test evaluated on an appropriate spectrum of patients? 4. Was the reference standard applied to all patients? 10 March

99 Appraising diagnosis articles Are the results important? What is meant by test accuracy? a. a true positive result b. a false positive result c. a false negative result d. a true negative result Ideally, we would like a test which produces a high proportion of a and d and a low proportion of b and c. 10 March

100 Appraising diagnosis articles Sensitivity and specificity Sensitivity the ability of the test to identify correctly those who have the disease Specificity the ability of the test to identify correctly those who do not have the disease Positive predictive value: If the test results are positive in this patient, what is the probability that this patient has the disease? Negative predictive value: If the test result is negative, what is the probability that this patient does not have the disease? 10 March

101 Appraising diagnosis articles Cochrane risk of bias assessment Patient selection Index test All test Reference standard Flow and timing 10 March

102 Appraising diagnosis articles Cochrane risk of bias assessment 10 March

103 Appraising diagnosis articles Cochrane risk of bias assessment 10 March

104 Appraising diagnosis articles Cochrane risk of bias assessment 10 March

105 Appraising diagnosis articles Cochrane risk of bias assessment 10 March

106 Appraising articles on harm/etiology Is the study valid? Was there a clearly defined question? Were there clearly defined, similar groups of patients? Were exposures and clinical outcomes measured the same way in both groups? Was the follow up complete and long enough? Does the suggested causative link make sense? 10 March

107 Appraising articles on harm/etiology Are the results important? the higher the risk or odds, the stronger the association Statistical significance 10 March

108 Appraising prognosis studies Is the study valid? Is the sample representative? Were they recruited at a common point in their illness? Did the study account for other important factors? Is the setting representative? Was follow up long enough for the clinical outcome? Was follow up complete? If follow up is less than 80% the study s validity is seriously undermined. Were outcomes measured blind? 10 March

109 Appraising prognosis studies Are the results important? What is the risk of the outcome over time? as a percentage of survival at a particular point in time; as a median survival (the length of time by which 50% of study patients have had the outcome); as a survival curve that depicts, at each point in time, the proportion (expressed as a percentage) of the original study sample who have not yet had a specified outcome. Survival curves provide the advantage that you can see how the patient s risk might develop over time. How precise are the estimates? 10 March

110 Appraising prognosis studies Other tools STROBE Ottawa Newcastle scale Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) 10 March

111 10 March

112 Appraising therapy articles Is the study valid? Was there a clearly defined research question? Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized and was the randomization list concealed? Were all patients accounted for at its conclusion? Was there an intention-to-treat analysis? Were research participants blind? Were the groups treated equally throughout? Did randomization produce comparable groups at the start of the trial? 10 March

113 Appraising therapy articles Are the results important? What is the benefit of the treatment? bias; chance variation between the two groups; the effect of the treatment. 10 March

114 Appraising therapy articles Quantifying the risk of benefit and harm Relative risk or risk ratio (RR) RR is the ratio of the risk in the experimental group divided by the risk in the control group. Absolute risk reduction (ARR) ARR is the difference between the event rates in the two groups. Relative risk reduction (RRR) Relative risk reduction is the ARR as a percentage of the control group risk 10 March

115 Appraising therapy articles Quantifying the risk of benefit and harm 10 March

116 Appraising therapy articles Quantifying the risk of benefit and harm Number needed to treat (NNT) Number needed to treat is the most useful measure of benefit, as it tells you the absolute number of patients who need to be treated to prevent one bad outcome. It is the inverse of the ARR: NNT = 1 ARR 10 March

117 Appraising therapy articles Cochran risk of bias tool 10 March

118 Appraising therapy articles Cochran risk of bias tool 10 March

119 Appraising therapy articles Other tools Jadad Scale Cochran tool CONSORT 10 March

120 10 March

121 Thanks for your kind attention 10 March

Evidence Based Medicine

Evidence Based Medicine Course Goals Goals 1. Understand basic concepts of evidence based medicine (EBM) and how EBM facilitates optimal patient care. 2. Develop a basic understanding of how clinical research studies are designed

More information

Clinical Epidemiology for the uninitiated

Clinical Epidemiology for the uninitiated Clinical epidemiologist have one foot in clinical care and the other in clinical practice research. As clinical epidemiologists we apply a wide array of scientific principles, strategies and tactics to

More information

Clinical Evidence: Asking the Question and Understanding the Answer. Keeping Up to Date. Keeping Up to Date

Clinical Evidence: Asking the Question and Understanding the Answer. Keeping Up to Date. Keeping Up to Date Clinical Evidence: Asking the Question and Understanding the Answer Keeping Up to Date 5,000? per day 1,500 per day 95 per day Keeping Up to Date 5,000? per day 1,500 per day 95 per day 1 Bias Bias refers

More information

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice Understanding and Using Systematic Reviews

Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice Understanding and Using Systematic Reviews J Nurs Sci Vol.28 No.4 Oct - Dec 2010 Essential Skills for Evidence-based Practice Understanding and Using Systematic Reviews Jeanne Grace Corresponding author: J Grace E-mail: Jeanne_Grace@urmc.rochester.edu

More information

Intro to Evidence Based Medicine

Intro to Evidence Based Medicine Intro to Evidence Based Medicine Dr Hasan Nugud Consultant Paediatric Surgeon 4/18/2015 EBM Resources 1 Outline What is EBM? Why do we need it? How to use EBM in daily practice The five steps Formulating

More information

Principles of meta-analysis

Principles of meta-analysis Principles of meta-analysis 1 The popularity of meta-analyses Search on 22 October 2015 10000 9000 8156 8875 8000 7000 6554 6000 5000 4852 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1 1 1 272 334 371 323 386 429 482 596 639

More information

Systematic Reviews. Simon Gates 8 March 2007

Systematic Reviews. Simon Gates 8 March 2007 Systematic Reviews Simon Gates 8 March 2007 Contents Reviewing of research Why we need reviews Traditional narrative reviews Systematic reviews Components of systematic reviews Conclusions Key reference

More information

Critical Appraisal. Dave Abbott Senior Medicines Information Pharmacist

Critical Appraisal. Dave Abbott Senior Medicines Information Pharmacist Critical Appraisal Dave Abbott Senior Medicines Information Pharmacist Aims Identify key components of clinical trial design and apply these to a critical appraisal of the literature Be able to work out

More information

Types of Data. Systematic Reviews: Data Synthesis Professor Jodie Dodd 4/12/2014. Acknowledgements: Emily Bain Australasian Cochrane Centre

Types of Data. Systematic Reviews: Data Synthesis Professor Jodie Dodd 4/12/2014. Acknowledgements: Emily Bain Australasian Cochrane Centre Early Nutrition Workshop, December 2014 Systematic Reviews: Data Synthesis Professor Jodie Dodd 1 Types of Data Acknowledgements: Emily Bain Australasian Cochrane Centre 2 1 What are dichotomous outcomes?

More information

Teaching critical appraisal of randomised controlled trials

Teaching critical appraisal of randomised controlled trials Teaching critical appraisal of randomised controlled trials Dr Kamal R. Mahtani BSc PhD MBBS PGDip MRCGP Deputy Director Centre for Evidence Based Medicine University of Oxford November 2014 1 objectives

More information

Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews

Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html www.joannabriggs.org

More information

Copyright GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD

Copyright GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD ASSISTANT PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS, MCMASTER UNIVERSITY Nancy Santesso,

More information

Meta-Analysis. Zifei Liu. Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Meta-Analysis. Zifei Liu. Biological and Agricultural Engineering Meta-Analysis Zifei Liu What is a meta-analysis; why perform a metaanalysis? How a meta-analysis work some basic concepts and principles Steps of Meta-analysis Cautions on meta-analysis 2 What is Meta-analysis

More information

Structural Approach to Bias in Meta-analyses

Structural Approach to Bias in Meta-analyses Original Article Received 26 July 2011, Revised 22 November 2011, Accepted 12 December 2011 Published online 2 February 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.52 Structural

More information

Assessing risk of bias

Assessing risk of bias Assessing risk of bias Norwegian Research School for Global Health Atle Fretheim Research Director, Norwegian Institute of Public Health Professor II, Uiniversity of Oslo Goal for the day We all have an

More information

GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology picture, 2 formulas & 3 acronyms

GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology picture, 2 formulas & 3 acronyms GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology 1991-2015 1 picture, 2 formulas & 3 acronyms 1 GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology Graphic Architectural Tool for Epidemiology Graphic Approach To

More information

Introduction to Systematic Reviews

Introduction to Systematic Reviews Introduction to Systematic Reviews Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics McGill University, Montreal, Canada Email: madhukar.pai@mcgill.ca Case Study 1: Egg

More information

Interpretation of Epidemiologic Studies

Interpretation of Epidemiologic Studies Interpretation of Epidemiologic Studies Paolo Boffetta Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, USA International Prevention Research Institute, Lyon, France Outline Introduction to epidemiology Issues

More information

EQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines

EQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines EQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines Doug Altman The EQUATOR Network Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK Key principles of research publications A published research

More information

Matching research design to clinical research questions

Matching research design to clinical research questions Resident s Page Matching research design to clinical research questions Sadaf Aslam, Helen Georgiev, Kedar Mehta 1, Ambuj Kumar University of South Florida, Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute

More information

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF MEDICAL LITERATURE. Samuel Iff ISPM Bern

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF MEDICAL LITERATURE. Samuel Iff ISPM Bern CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF MEDICAL LITERATURE Samuel Iff ISPM Bern siff@ispm.unibe.ch Contents Study designs Asking good questions Pitfalls in clinical studies How to assess validity (RCT) Conclusion Step-by-step

More information

Understanding NNT- Patient s and Physicians Perspective

Understanding NNT- Patient s and Physicians Perspective Understanding NNT- Patient s and Physicians Perspective A K Ghosh, K Ghosh Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, USA Number needed to treat - NNT Useful yardstick to describe

More information

Rapid appraisal of the literature: Identifying study biases

Rapid appraisal of the literature: Identifying study biases Rapid appraisal of the literature: Identifying study biases Rita Popat, PhD Clinical Assistant Professor Division of Epidemiology Stanford University School of Medicine August 7, 2007 What is critical

More information

Part 1: Epidemiological terminology. Part 2: Epidemiological concepts. Participant s Names:

Part 1: Epidemiological terminology. Part 2: Epidemiological concepts. Participant s Names: Part 1: Epidemiological terminology Participant s Names: _ a. Define the following terms: (award 2 points for each word that is defined correctly) 1. Fomite: a physical object that serves to transmit an

More information

Robotic Bariatric Surgery. Richdeep S. Gill, MD Research Fellow Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery (CAMIS)

Robotic Bariatric Surgery. Richdeep S. Gill, MD Research Fellow Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery (CAMIS) Robotic Bariatric Surgery Richdeep S. Gill, MD Research Fellow Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery (CAMIS) Background Over 500 million obese individuals worldwide Bariatric surgery

More information

Critical Appraisal of Evidence

Critical Appraisal of Evidence Critical Appraisal of Evidence A Focus on Intervention/Treatment Studies Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, CPNP/PMHNP, FNAP, FAAN Associate Vice President for Health Promotion University Chief Wellness Officer

More information

\ jar gon \ BUSTER. For research terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1

\ jar gon \ BUSTER. For research terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 \ jar gon \ BUSTER For research terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) \ jar gon \ BUSTER This glossary provides lay language definitions

More information

Drain versus no-drain after gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer Student EBM presentations

Drain versus no-drain after gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer Student EBM presentations Drain versus no-drain after gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer Student EBM presentations Selali Fiamanya & Jawaad Farrukh University of Oxford October 2014 The question Mr X is a 56

More information

Critically Appraising Geriatric ED Screening Instruments Opening Pandora s Box to Futility or Identifying Novel Opportunities?

Critically Appraising Geriatric ED Screening Instruments Opening Pandora s Box to Futility or Identifying Novel Opportunities? Critically Appraising Geriatric ED Screening Instruments Opening Pandora s Box to Futility or Identifying Novel Opportunities? Christopher R. Carpenter, MD, MSc, FACEP, AGSF June 2, 2015 Disclosure of

More information

Abstract: Learning Objectives: Posttest:

Abstract: Learning Objectives: Posttest: Title of Course: Evidence Based Practice in Communication Disorders CE Credit: 6 Hours (0.6 CEUs) Learning Level: Advanced Author: Christine A. Dollaghan, PhD, CCC SLP Abstract: With this landmark textbook,

More information

Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies

Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies Revised and edited by Renatus Ziegler B.C. Reeves a W. Gaus b a Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Great Britain b Biometrie und Medizinische Dokumentation,

More information

What is EBM? Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine. The integration of: Defining EBM: From the Surgeon s Perspective

What is EBM? Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine. The integration of: Defining EBM: From the Surgeon s Perspective What is EBM? Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine Michael Alvarado, MD March 21, 2011 The integration of: Best Research Evidencewith Clinical Expertiseand Patient Values Sackett et al., 2000 Defining

More information

Introduction to Meta-analysis of Accuracy Data

Introduction to Meta-analysis of Accuracy Data Introduction to Meta-analysis of Accuracy Data Hans Reitsma MD, PhD Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Academic Medical Center - Amsterdam Continental European Support Unit

More information

UNDERSTANDING EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES. Csaba P Kovesdy, MD FASN Salem VA Medical Center, Salem VA University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA

UNDERSTANDING EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES. Csaba P Kovesdy, MD FASN Salem VA Medical Center, Salem VA University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA UNDERSTANDING EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES Csaba P Kovesdy, MD FASN Salem VA Medical Center, Salem VA University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA Study design in epidemiological research: Summary Observational

More information

Version No. 7 Date: July Please send comments or suggestions on this glossary to

Version No. 7 Date: July Please send comments or suggestions on this glossary to Impact Evaluation Glossary Version No. 7 Date: July 2012 Please send comments or suggestions on this glossary to 3ie@3ieimpact.org. Recommended citation: 3ie (2012) 3ie impact evaluation glossary. International

More information

Observational Study Designs. Review. Today. Measures of disease occurrence. Cohort Studies

Observational Study Designs. Review. Today. Measures of disease occurrence. Cohort Studies Observational Study Designs Denise Boudreau, PhD Center for Health Studies Group Health Cooperative Today Review cohort studies Case-control studies Design Identifying cases and controls Measuring exposure

More information

SkillBuilder Shortcut: Levels of Evidence

SkillBuilder Shortcut: Levels of Evidence SkillBuilder Shortcut: Levels of Evidence This shortcut sheet was developed by Research Advocacy Network to assist advocates in understanding Levels of Evidence and how these concepts apply to clinical

More information

Health Studies 315. Clinical Epidemiology: Evidence of Risk and Harm

Health Studies 315. Clinical Epidemiology: Evidence of Risk and Harm Health Studies 315 Clinical Epidemiology: Evidence of Risk and Harm 1 Patients encounter (possibly) risky exposures Alcohol during pregnancy (fetal risk) Electromagnetic fields (cancer risk) Vasectomy

More information

Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the management of community-based patients with chronic leg ulceration

Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the management of community-based patients with chronic leg ulceration Cost and dressing evaluation of hydrofiber and alginate dressings in the management of community-based patients with chronic leg ulceration Harding K G, Price P, Robinson B, Thomas S, Hofman D Record Status

More information

Surveillance report Published: 17 March 2016 nice.org.uk

Surveillance report Published: 17 March 2016 nice.org.uk Surveillance report 2016 Ovarian Cancer (2011) NICE guideline CG122 Surveillance report Published: 17 March 2016 nice.org.uk NICE 2016. All rights reserved. Contents Surveillance decision... 3 Reason for

More information

Less is more: Guidelines

Less is more: Guidelines ESIM Summer School June 20 Friday, 2014 Less is more: Guidelines Primiano Iannone, MD Head of Emergency Department Ospedali del Tigullio, Lavagna (GE) Italy layout What is a clinical guideline Why do we

More information

Is There An Association?

Is There An Association? Is There An Association? Exposure (Risk Factor) Outcome Exposures Risk factors Preventive measures Management strategy Independent variables Outcomes Dependent variable Disease occurrence Lack of exercise

More information

Quantitative Research Methods and Tools

Quantitative Research Methods and Tools Quantitative Research Methods and Tools Fraser Health Authority, 2011 The Fraser Health Authority ( FH ) authorizes the use, reproduction and/or modification of this publication for purposes other than

More information

Effective Health Care Program

Effective Health Care Program Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 77 Effective Health Care Program Physical Therapy Interventions for Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis Executive Summary Background Osteoarthritis (OA), the most

More information

Meta-analysis: Advanced methods using the STATA software

Meta-analysis: Advanced methods using the STATA software Page 1 sur 5 Wednesday 20 September 2017 - Introduction to meta-analysis Introduction I. Why do a meta-analysis? II. How does a meta-analysis work? Some concepts III. Definition of an «effect size» 1.

More information

Methodology for ACOEM s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines 2017 Revision. This document was approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors.

Methodology for ACOEM s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines 2017 Revision. This document was approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors. Methodology for ACOEM s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines 2017 Revision This document was approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors. 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction 4 Page II. Purpose and Scope

More information

Three day course in Evidence-Based Practice Dec 2015

Three day course in Evidence-Based Practice Dec 2015 www.cebm.net Three day course in Evidence-Based Practice Dec 2015 Professor Carl Heneghan University of Oxford Director CEBM www.cebm.net Developing Evidence-Based Practice? Carl Heneghan MA, MRCGP Centre

More information

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Study Designs in Epidemiology Study Designs in Epidemiology Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, BDS, MPH, DrPH First semester 2017/ 2018 Department of Family and Community Medicine School of Medicine/ The University of Jordan Epidemiologic Study

More information

Clinical Epidemiology I: Deciding on Appropriate Therapy

Clinical Epidemiology I: Deciding on Appropriate Therapy Clinical Epidemiology I: Deciding on Appropriate Therapy 1 Clinical Scenario [UG2B] 65 yo man controlled HTN 6-mo Hx cardioversion-resistant afib Benefit vs risk of long-term anticoagulation:? prevent

More information

An Introduction to Epidemiology

An Introduction to Epidemiology An Introduction to Epidemiology Wei Liu, MPH Biostatistics Core Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge, LA Last edited: January, 14 th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................

More information

Journal Club PowerPoint Template. A Question of Therapy RCT

Journal Club PowerPoint Template. A Question of Therapy RCT Journal Club PowerPoint Template A Question of Therapy RCT 1 EBM Process Ask a well built (focused) clinical question Search for the best evidence to answer the question Critically appraise the evidence

More information

Study design. Chapter 64. Research Methodology S.B. MARTINS, A. ZIN, W. ZIN

Study design. Chapter 64. Research Methodology S.B. MARTINS, A. ZIN, W. ZIN Chapter 64 Study design S.B. MARTINS, A. ZIN, W. ZIN Research Methodology Scientific methodology comprises a set of rules and procedures to investigate the phenomena of interest. These rules and procedures

More information

Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors

Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors Nicky Welton Thanks to: Tony Ades, John Carlin, Doug Altman, Jonathan Sterne, Ross Harris RSS Avon Local Group Meeting,

More information

TITLE: Fusidic Acid for Ophthalmic Infections: A Review of Clinical and Cost Effectiveness and Safety

TITLE: Fusidic Acid for Ophthalmic Infections: A Review of Clinical and Cost Effectiveness and Safety TITLE: Fusidic Acid for Ophthalmic Infections: A Review of Clinical and Cost Effectiveness and Safety DATE: 22 February 2013 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES The antibiotic fusidic acid is available in a 1% suspension

More information

Mixed Methods Study Design

Mixed Methods Study Design 1 Mixed Methods Study Design Kurt C. Stange, MD, PhD Professor of Family Medicine, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Oncology and Sociology Case Western Reserve University 1. Approaches 1, 2 a. Qualitative

More information

Setting The setting was primary and secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the USA.

Setting The setting was primary and secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the USA. Cost-effectiveness of pap smear screening for vaginal cancer after total hysterectomy for benign disease Fetters M D, Lieberman R W, Abrahamse P H, Sanghvi R V, Sonnad S S Record Status This is a critical

More information

Challenges of Observational and Retrospective Studies

Challenges of Observational and Retrospective Studies Challenges of Observational and Retrospective Studies Kyoungmi Kim, Ph.D. March 8, 2017 This seminar is jointly supported by the following NIH-funded centers: Background There are several methods in which

More information

Evidence tabellen thema Interventies: Preventie van angst bij jeugdigen en niveau van bewijsvoering

Evidence tabellen thema Interventies: Preventie van angst bij jeugdigen en niveau van bewijsvoering Evidence tabellen thema Interventies: Preventie van angst bij jeugdigen en niveau van bewijsvoering In deze evidence tabellen word de drie meta analyses en systematische reviews beschreven die in dit hoofdstuk

More information

1. PICO question. Interventions Reference standard or comparators Outcomes. Study design Other

1. PICO question. Interventions Reference standard or comparators Outcomes. Study design Other Title: Strategies for optimizing HIV monitoring among adults, children and pregnant women living with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review Contents 1. PICO question... 1 2. Search

More information

The presence of bacteria in the urine of an individual

The presence of bacteria in the urine of an individual Clinical Guidelines Annals of Internal Medicine Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement Kenneth Lin,

More information

How has acceptability of healthcare interventions been defined and assessed? An overview of Systematic Reviews

How has acceptability of healthcare interventions been defined and assessed? An overview of Systematic Reviews Academic excellence for business and the professions How has acceptability of healthcare interventions been defined and assessed? An overview of Systematic Reviews Mandeep Sekhon*, Martin Cartwright, &

More information

The comparison or control group may be allocated a placebo intervention, an alternative real intervention or no intervention at all.

The comparison or control group may be allocated a placebo intervention, an alternative real intervention or no intervention at all. 1. RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS (Treatment studies) (Relevant JAMA User s Guides, Numbers IIA & B: references (3,4) Introduction: The most valid study design for assessing the effectiveness (both the benefits

More information

Understanding Diagnostic Research Outline of Topics

Understanding Diagnostic Research Outline of Topics Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Freiräume für wissenschaftliche Weiterbildung Understanding Diagnostic Research Outline of Topics Werner Vach, Veronika Reiser, Izabela Kolankowska In Kooperation mit

More information

Chapter 2. Epidemiological and Toxicological Studies

Chapter 2. Epidemiological and Toxicological Studies Chapter 2 Epidemiological and Toxicological Studies Introduction Epidemiological and toxicological studies seek to determine the cause of a particular illness or disease. Etiology is the study of causes.

More information

Number of grams of fat x 9 calories per gram = Total number of calories from fat

Number of grams of fat x 9 calories per gram = Total number of calories from fat Health professionals believe that the average American diet contains too much fat. Although there is no recommended daily allowance for fat, it is recommended that fat intake be limited to 30% of the total

More information

Critical Appraisal of RCT

Critical Appraisal of RCT Critical Appraisal of RCT What is critical appraisal? Definition Process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its reliability (validity/internal validity), results and relevance (external

More information

EPIDEMIOLOGY. Training module

EPIDEMIOLOGY. Training module 1. Scope of Epidemiology Definitions Clinical epidemiology Epidemiology research methods Difficulties in studying epidemiology of Pain 2. Measures used in Epidemiology Disease frequency Disease risk Disease

More information

Summary HTA. HTA-Report Summary

Summary HTA. HTA-Report Summary Summary HTA HTA-Report Summary Prognostic value, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high sensitivity C-reactive protein as a marker in primary prevention of major cardiac events Schnell-Inderst

More information

Evidence-Based Medicine for clinical years Sep 13 th 2016

Evidence-Based Medicine for clinical years Sep 13 th 2016 Evidence-Based Medicine for clinical years Sep 13 th 2016 Professor Carl Heneghan University of Oxford Director CEBM What is Evidence-Based Medicine? Evidence-based medicine is the integration of best

More information

Daily Agenda. Honors Statistics. 1. Check homework C4#9. 4. Discuss 4.3 concepts. Finish 4.2 concepts. March 28, 2017

Daily Agenda. Honors Statistics. 1. Check homework C4#9. 4. Discuss 4.3 concepts. Finish 4.2 concepts. March 28, 2017 Honors Statistics Aug 23-8:26 PM Daily Agenda 1. Check homework C4#9 Finish 4.2 concepts 4. Discuss 4.3 concepts Aug 23-8:31 PM 1 Apr 6-9:53 AM Nov 11-12:33 PM 2 Lack of BLINDING... The same person "experimenter"

More information

HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROTOCOL

HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROTOCOL Research and Evidence Based Medicine Committee 2010-2011 HOW TO DEVELOP A RESEARCH PROTOCOL Evidence-Based Medicine The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions

More information

Evidence-based Imaging: Critically Appraising Studies of Diagnostic Tests

Evidence-based Imaging: Critically Appraising Studies of Diagnostic Tests Evidence-based Imaging: Critically Appraising Studies of Diagnostic Tests Aine Marie Kelly, MD Critically Appraising Studies of Diagnostic Tests Aine Marie Kelly B.A., M.B. B.Ch. B.A.O., M.S. M.R.C.P.I.,

More information

Diagnostic research in perspective: examples of retrieval, synthesis and analysis Bachmann, L.M.

Diagnostic research in perspective: examples of retrieval, synthesis and analysis Bachmann, L.M. UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Diagnostic research in perspective: examples of retrieval, synthesis and analysis Bachmann, L.M. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bachmann,

More information

Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What s the difference?

Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What s the difference? Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What s the difference? Andrea C. Tricco PhD MSc Jesmin Antony, MSc Sharon E. Straus, MD MSc CADTH Rapid Review Summit Objectives To discuss the difference between

More information

Chapter 11. Experimental Design: One-Way Independent Samples Design

Chapter 11. Experimental Design: One-Way Independent Samples Design 11-1 Chapter 11. Experimental Design: One-Way Independent Samples Design Advantages and Limitations Comparing Two Groups Comparing t Test to ANOVA Independent Samples t Test Independent Samples ANOVA Comparing

More information

Epidemiological study design. Paul Pharoah Department of Public Health and Primary Care

Epidemiological study design. Paul Pharoah Department of Public Health and Primary Care Epidemiological study design Paul Pharoah Department of Public Health and Primary Care Molecules What/why? Organelles Cells Tissues Organs Clinical medicine Individuals Public health medicine Populations

More information

Drug Class Literature Scan: Pancreatic Enzymes

Drug Class Literature Scan: Pancreatic Enzymes Copyright 2012 Oregon State University. All Rights Reserved Drug Use Research & Management Program Oregon State University, 500 Summer Street NE, E35 Salem, Oregon 97301-1079 Phone 503-947-5220 Fax 503-947-1119

More information

Dose and Response for Chemicals

Dose and Response for Chemicals Dose and Response for Chemicals 5 5 DOSE AND RESPONSE FOR CHEMICALS All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy. Paracelsus, 16th

More information

EBM Journal Club: Does Ginkgo Biloba improve memory in elder group

EBM Journal Club: Does Ginkgo Biloba improve memory in elder group EBM Journal Club: Does Ginkgo Biloba improve memory in elder group R2 0 Memory loss in elder >> Dementia Defination Diagnosis Prognosis 1 Why so serious? 2 Any way to improve memory in elder??? 3 Any way

More information

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Optimizing the embryo transfer technique Abou-Setta, A.M. Link to publication

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Optimizing the embryo transfer technique Abou-Setta, A.M. Link to publication UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Optimizing the embryo transfer technique Abou-Setta, A.M. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Abou-Setta, A. M. (2008). Optimizing the embryo

More information

Getting Evidence into Clinical Practice: Musculoskeletal Research Facilitation Group (CAT Group) Date: June 2017

Getting Evidence into Clinical Practice: Musculoskeletal Research Facilitation Group (CAT Group) Date: June 2017 Specific Question: In adults with chronic shoulder pain is a nerve ablation procedure (for the suprascapular nerve) as effective in reducing pain, in the long term compared with usual care? Clinical bottom

More information

Explosion of knowledge since the 1970 s. Textbooks outdated before publication

Explosion of knowledge since the 1970 s. Textbooks outdated before publication Explosion of knowledge since the 1970 s Textbooks outdated before publication 1 Scientific chaos Meta - analyses Systematic reviews Implementation of evidence into practice 2 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN MEDICINE

More information

Authors' objectives To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for neurologic conditions.

Authors' objectives To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for neurologic conditions. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of neurologic conditions: a systematic review Fergusson D, Hutton B, Sharma M, Tinmouth A, Wilson K, Cameron D W, Hebert P C CRD summary This review assessed

More information

Adhesive strips for the closure of surgical wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adhesive strips for the closure of surgical wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adhesive strips for the closure of surgical wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis Presenting author: I Gkegkes, M Mavros, V Alexiou, G Peppas, M Falagas Vangelis G. Alexiou, MD, MSc General Surgery

More information

NeuRA Schizophrenia diagnosis May 2017

NeuRA Schizophrenia diagnosis May 2017 Introduction Diagnostic scales are widely used within clinical practice and research settings to ensure consistency of illness ratings. These scales have been extensively validated and provide a set of

More information

Behavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes

Behavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2009; Vol. 9, No.21 Behavioural Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes An Evidence-Based Analysis Presented to the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee in

More information

Strategies to increase the uptake of the influenza vaccine by healthcare workers: A summary of the evidence

Strategies to increase the uptake of the influenza vaccine by healthcare workers: A summary of the evidence Strategies to increase the uptake of the influenza vaccine by healthcare workers: A summary of the evidence This evidence summary document has been prepared for the National Collaborating Centres for Public

More information

Checklist for Case Control Studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews

Checklist for Case Control Studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews Checklist for http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html www.joannabriggs.org The Joanna Briggs

More information

New Math: Taking on Overdiagnosis Waste and Harm Flipped Classroom: Pre-work

New Math: Taking on Overdiagnosis Waste and Harm Flipped Classroom: Pre-work New Math: Taking on Overdiagnosis Waste and Harm Flipped Classroom: Pre-work IHI Forum, Session C24 Faculty: Dr. James Leo, Helen Macfie Session Objectives Understand the difference between absolute and

More information

BEST in MH clinical question-answering service

BEST in MH clinical question-answering service 1 BEST.awp.nhs.uk Best Evidence Summaries of Topics in Mental Healthcare BEST in MH clinical question-answering service Question In adult patients experiencing a mental health crisis, which service model

More information

Surveillance report Published: 8 June 2017 nice.org.uk. NICE All rights reserved.

Surveillance report Published: 8 June 2017 nice.org.uk. NICE All rights reserved. Surveillance report 2017 Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance (2014) NICE guideline CG192 Surveillance report Published: 8 June 2017 nice.org.uk NICE 2017. All

More information

Feng-Yi Lai, RN, MSN, Instructor Department of Nursing, Shu-Zen College of Medicine and Management, Asphodel Yang, RN, PhD, Associate Professor

Feng-Yi Lai, RN, MSN, Instructor Department of Nursing, Shu-Zen College of Medicine and Management, Asphodel Yang, RN, PhD, Associate Professor Feng-Yi Lai, RN, MSN, Instructor Department of Nursing, Shu-Zen College of Medicine and Management, Asphodel Yang, RN, PhD, Associate Professor Department of Nursing, Central Taiwan University of Science

More information

1. Your well-built, focused Clinical Question with the PICO components.

1. Your well-built, focused Clinical Question with the PICO components. Name: Email address: Peter Piper ppiper@uci.edu Date: * Question 1. PICO (Patient/Population & Problem Intervention/Exposure Comparison Outcome). Please enter your Clinical Question (in sentence format)

More information

Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews of Implantable Medical Devices

Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews of Implantable Medical Devices Draft Methods Research Report Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews of Implantable Medical Devices Version [#] Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and

More information

Study Designs. Lecture 3. Kevin Frick

Study Designs. Lecture 3. Kevin Frick This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this

More information

Preventing Tuberculosis (TB) Transmission in Ambulatory Surgery Centers. Heidi Behm, RN, MPH TB Controller HIV/STD/TB Program

Preventing Tuberculosis (TB) Transmission in Ambulatory Surgery Centers. Heidi Behm, RN, MPH TB Controller HIV/STD/TB Program Preventing Tuberculosis (TB) Transmission in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Heidi Behm, RN, MPH TB Controller HIV/STD/TB Program Topics of Discussion TB Overview Epidemiology of TB in Oregon Annual Facility

More information

Journal Club September 29, Vanessa AKIKI PGYlII Internal Medicine

Journal Club September 29, Vanessa AKIKI PGYlII Internal Medicine Journal Club September 29, 2017 Vanessa AKIKI PGYlII Internal Medicine AUBMC 2017 Case Presentation 41-year-old man who was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes 21 years ago presents to your clinic. He believes

More information