FDA Regulation of Diagnostic Tests Jeffrey N. Gibbs Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Washington, DC
|
|
- Delilah Day
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AIPLA Annual Meeting Joint Biotechnology Committee/ Special Committee on FDA Law Program October 21, 2010 Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Washington, DC FDA Regulation of Diagnostic Tests Jeffrey N. Gibbs Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Washington, DC
2 Introduction In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) are playing an increasingly important role in medicine. Many new types of diagnostics being developed. Introducing new diagnostics to the market presents potential regulatory challenges. 2
3 Definition of an IVD A product intended to be used to diagnose a disease or other condition is regulated as a device. Diagnose has been given a broad interpretation by the courts. Diagnose also encompasses screening, monitoring, prognosis, etc. Technology does not determine whether product is regulated as a device. Not all tests are diagnostic, e.g., genealogy, ancestry, etc. 3
4 Intended Use: A Pivotal Concept Intended Use is governed by the objective intent of the company 21 C.F.R Intended use can determine whether Premarket Approval (PMA), 510(k) Premarket notification, or no FDA review. Intended use can determine how much data and what type, e.g., prospective large scale study for screening study vs. small retrospective study for monitoring. Affects reimbursement. Relationship to IP? 4
5 Intended Use: A Pivotal Concept (cont d.) Needs to be considered at an early stage and integrated with regulatory, clinical and marketing input. Needs to match clinical data and study population. Controls claims for IVD once cleared/approved. Subtle differences can have a large regulatory impact, e.g., rule out vs. rule in. 5
6 Intended Use: A Pivotal Concept (cont d.) Intended use can include population tested, purpose of test, etc. An intended use is more specific than A test for Cancer X. Closely related term is indications for use. Subject to intensive negotiations with FDA. What companies end up with can be very different from their starting point. To sum up: Can determine whether PMA or 510(k), what data need to be collected (time and cost), reimbursement coverage, and marketing strategy. 6
7 In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs): Routes to the Market Premarket Approval Application 510(k) premarket notification De Novo Reclassification Investigational Use Only Research Use Only Analyte Specific Reagents Laboratory Developed Tests 7
8 FDA Classification Scheme Level of regulation linked to product risk. Class I low risk. 510(k) generally not needed; may be exempt from Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) regulation. Example: Equine encephalomyelitis virus serological reagents. Class II moderate risk. Usually subject to 510(k) and GMP. Example: Glucose. May also need to meet special controls. Class III highest risk. PMA required. Example: Human Papilloma Virus assays and cancer screening tests. Risk is independent of performance of the assay. 8
9 510(k) Premarket Notification Most common route to market with new assay. Need to show substantial equivalence to a predicate device. Predicate devices on the market before May 28, 1976 or cleared by FDA through a 510(k). PMA approved device cannot be a predicate device for a 510(k), unless reclassified. 9
10 510(k) Premarket Notification (cont d.) Substantial equivalence. Same intended use, though FDA has some flexibility in applying requirement. Same technology, or technological differences do not raise different issues of safety or effectiveness. Typically, the use of novel technology, such as proteinbased markers, does not preclude 510(k) clearance. Will need to provide performance data. The kinds of data requested may be affected by type of technology and its novelty. Clinical data will be required for new types of assay. Analytical test data, e.g., reproducibility, will be required. 10
11 510(k) Premarket Notification (cont d.) FDA can find Substantially Equivalent, allowing IVD to be marketed. Can find 510(k) Not Substantially Equivalent, i.e., reject it. Ask for more information. 90 days per review cycle. Recently, many criticisms of 510(k) process. FDA has unveiled internal reports on the 510(k) process, with many recommendations. In general, will make 510(k)s more challenging. 11
12 De Novo Classification Some low or moderate risk devices lack predicate device. For these products, FDA can use de novo classification process. Company submits 510(k). Found Not Substantially Equivalent. Then submit petition for de novo classification. FDA can then clear the device. FDA will issue special controls guidance document. 12
13 De Novo Classification (cont d.) FDA has used de novo process about two times per year for IVDs, e.g., circulating tumor cells for breast cancer, and recent ovarian cancer test. FDA prefers to use 510(k) if possible because less work, since no guidance document needed. Subsequent applicants can use 510(k) process. 13
14 Premarket Approval Application Requires clinical data. Voluminous submission. 180 day review cycle. Advisory panel for at least the first submission for that type of assay. Pre-approval GMP inspection. FDA typically monitors study sites. More costly than 510(k)s and generally takes longer. Once obtain approval, harder to make changes. 510(k) route is preferred. Potential exclusivity impact of IVD intended to be used diagnostically with drug? Can get patent term extension. 14
15 Investigational Use Only (IUO) IUO products are intended for use in clinical investigations. Vehicle for generating clinical data to support marketing application. Can charge for IUO products within limits. Product must be labeled as IUO. Sponsor needs to receive some data back from investigators. Limited promotional claims. Manufacturer can sell IUO products. Clinical trial agreement between sponsor and investigator. Should include IP-related clauses IUO products may have protection from patent infringement claims. 15
16 Investigational Use Only (IUO) (cont d.) Generally, FDA approval not needed to begin study. Typically will need approval from an institutional review board for prospective studies, and possibly for retrospective. May need to obtain patient informed consent. Banked specimens can be used under some circumstances. Exempt from GMP regulation. 16
17 Research Use Only (RUO) RUO products are intended for use in basic research or to identify a potential clinical application. Cannot claim safe, effective, or has diagnostic utility. Can charge for RUO products. No need to collect data. Exempt from GMPs. Can create reimbursement issues for laboratories. Useful for niche products, but not a successful longterm strategy for products with diagnostic value. FDA has been concerned about misuse of RUO category, and plans to issue a new draft guidance document aimed at RUO manufacturers. 17
18 Analyte Specific Reagents (ASRs) ASRs are building blocks for assays developed by laboratories. They are generally exempt from 510(k) or PMA, but do need to comply with GMPs. In a guidance document issued in September 2007, FDA substantially narrowed the scope of ASRs. Can contain only a single marker, e.g., no primer/pair probes. Cannot be on a bead or something similar. 18
19 Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) LDTs are subject to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment. FDA first said it could regulate LDTs in According to FDA, all LDTs are medical devices and subject to full device regulation. FDA did not seek to exercise power until a few years ago. Exercising it more frequently, e.g., Warning Letter to LabCorp regarding OvaSure. Issue: How much work does a lab need to do for a test to qualify as LDT? 19
20 Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) (cont d.) FDA has stated it intends to no longer exercise enforcement discretion over LDTs, but will actively regulate them. Two-day public meeting in July to discuss. Commenters did not oppose concept of FDA regulation. Considerable concern about manner in which regulation would occur, particularly for rare/orphan diseases and emerging diseases, and cost of regulation. FDA has said prioritization scheme will be risk-based. Diagnostics that guide drug therapy will be priority for being brought under FDA regulation. 20
21 Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) (cont d.) Will take some time for details of framework to be developed. FDA has said does not intend to disrupt current testing. Grandfather period for tests on the market. Grace period, i.e., delayed effective date. Impact on innovation? Impact on FDA workload? FDA s regulation of LDTs may prompt litigation. Begin by requiring registration of laboratories? 21
22 Conclusion Public health impact increasing. IVDs represent a large and growing industry. Complex, evolving regulatory environment. 22
February 2, Dear Dr. Shuren,
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network 555 11 th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 202.661.5700 www.acscan.org Jeffrey E. Shuren, M.D., J.D. Director, Center for Devices and Radiological
More informationPrimer: Medical Device User Fee Amendments Han Zhong l September 2011
Primer: Medical Device User Fee Amendments Han Zhong l September 2011 Introduction The Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA or MDUFA) is a set of agreements between the Food and Drug Administration
More informationOverview of the Legal Framework for Medical Device Regulation in the United States
1 Overview of the Legal Framework for Medical Device Regulation in the United States Ellen J. Flannery This chapter provides an overview of the legal framework for medical device regulation in the United
More informationIn Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Direct Oral Anticoagulants- Premarket Review
In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Direct Oral Anticoagulants- Premarket Review Cardiac Safety Research Consortium December 3, 2015 Lea Carrington Division of Immunology and Hematology Devices Office of In
More informationStrengthening the Center for Devices and Radiological Health s 510(k) Review Process February 18, 2010
Strengthening the Center for Devices and Radiological Health s 510(k) Review Process February 18, 2010 R. Glenn Neuman, Director of Scientific Affairs NWRSInc.@gmail.com NewWorldReg.com NWRS was founded
More informationPreparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission
Preparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission If you want to introduce your medical device to the US market, you need to obtain clearance from the FDA. This clearance is obtained from the FDA via
More informationCDRH: 510(k)S AND SCIENCE IN REGULATOR DECISION-MAKING. lannery, Scott Danzis and Christopher Pruitt. November 2010 SPECIAL REPRINT
November 2010 SPECIAL REPRINT CDRH: 510(k)S AND SCIENCE IN REGULATOR ORY DECISION-MAKING By Ellen Flanner lannery, Scott Danzis and Christopher Pruitt Reproduced with the kind permission of Global Regulatory
More informationThe Path to U.S. Market for Functional Food Ingredients
The Path to U.S. Market for Functional Food Ingredients American College of Nutrition Symposium Morristown, New Jersey November 18, 2011 DIANE B. McCOLL Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. 700 Thirteenth Street,
More informationOverhauling The 510(k) Process
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Overhauling The 510(k) Process Law360, New York (August
More informationSeptember 28, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852
September 28, 2011 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. : Center for Devices and Radiological Health 510(k)
More informationFDA Oversight of Nanotechnology Applications in Foods, Food Packaging, and Nutrient Delivery
FDA Oversight of Nanotechnology Applications in Foods, Food Packaging, and Nutrient Delivery Laura M. Tarantino, Ph.D. Office of Food Additive Safety Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)
More informationThe Tobacco Control Act s Premarket Review Authorities: Reports on Substantial Equivalence and Exemption Requests (905(j))
The Tobacco Control Act s Premarket Review Authorities: Reports on Substantial Equivalence and Exemption Requests (905(j)) January 12, 2011 Cristi Stark, MS Senior Regulatory Health Project Manager Office
More informationBEST PRACTICE CHANGE CONTROL : DECIDING WHEN TO SUBMIT A 510(K) FOR A DEVICE CHANGE. Yuan Xu 18- JAN- 2018
BEST PRACTICE CHANGE CONTROL : DECIDING WHEN TO SUBMIT A 510(K) FOR A DEVICE CHANGE Yuan Xu 18- JAN- 2018 Background AGENDA What is Medical Device? What is 510(k)? Principles of best practices of device
More informationMitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association
Regulatory Public Laws Compliance & Education Policies Science & Enforcement & Communications The FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Its Role in Reducing Tobacco Use Mitch Zeller, Director, Center
More informationKey CDRH Regulatory Initiatives
Key CDRH Regulatory Initiatives Revamping the Submission Process Creating New Strategies Ralph F. Hall University of Minnesota Law School Counsel Faegre Baker & Daniels May 8, 2012 Purpose of Today s Program
More informationMicrobiology Devices; Reclassification of Influenza Virus Antigen Detection Test Systems
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/12/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-00199, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationIndustry s Perspective on the Status of Medical Device Regulations. FUNDISA Workshop 09 & 10 Oct Anele Vutha SAMED Regulatory Committee
Industry s Perspective on the Status of Medical Device Regulations FUNDISA Workshop 09 & 10 Oct 2014 Anele Vutha SAMED Regulatory Committee Today s Topics: 1. Medical Device Definition - Differences 2.
More informationMark M. Yacura. Partner
Mark M. Yacura Partner Mark M. Yacura focuses his practice primarily on FDA legal and regulatory matters. He has practiced in this area for more than 30 years. He represents his clients before administrative
More informationConsistent with Labeling Final Guidance: Implications for Devices
Consistent with Labeling Final Guidance: Implications for Devices Vernessa Pollard, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery Cassie Scherer, Principal Legal Counsel, Medtronic Jeffrey Shapiro, Director, Hyman,
More informationMay 7, Dear Mr. Landa:
Ralph A. Simmons 202 429 6459 rsimmons@steptoe.com 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-1795 202 429 3000 main www.steptoe.com May 7, 2013 Michael M. Landa Director, Center for Food Safety
More informationIntroduction. Current status of 510(k) clinical data requirements. 1 Current Status&Considerations:
510(k) Current Status&Considerations: Conducting a Well-Controlled Clinical Study When Clinical Data is Required Introduction In an effort to promote innovation while protecting the population at large,
More informationFDA 510(k) 101 The Basics
FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics Floyd G. Larson President, PaxMed International San Diego, CA OMTEC June 17, 2010 Chicago Agenda History of 510(k) process FDA s risk based approach FDA guidance and standards
More informationATTACHMENT A AdvaMed Comments Draft-Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff -510(k) Modifications: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device Line(s) No. Line or lines numbers of the
More information510(k) submissions. Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving
Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving 510(k) submissions Audrey Swearingen, RAC Director, Regulatory Affairs Telephone: +1 512.222.0263 Email: aswearingen@emergogroup.com Download this white
More informationNDI: LOOKING BACK & AHEAD
NDI: LOOKING BACK & AHEAD Chi Hee Kim D i r e c t o r, W o r l d w i d e R e g u l a t o r y, G o v e r n m e n t a n d I n d u s t r y A f f a i r s H e r b a l i f e I n t e r n a t i o n a l o f A m
More informationDecember 4, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION
VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION December 4, 2017 Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Development of a List of pre-dietary Supplement
More informationManufacturer Sponsored Speech
Manufacturer Sponsored Speech Legislative, Regulatory and Alan R. Bennett March 22, 2016 Agenda Why Now? Major Areas of Dispute Current Developments - FDA - Judicial - Legislative Summary of Trends 1 WHY
More informationFDA s 510(k) Working Group
Understing the Premarket Notification (510(k)) Process FDA s 510(k) Working Group Presentation to the Institute of Medicine March 1, 2010 Donna-Bea Tillman, Ph.D. Director, Office of Deice Ealuation U.S.
More informationVision and strategies to Increase Access to Innovative HIV Diagnostic Technologies. Willy Urassa. AMD STAKE HOLDERS MEETING 7-8 May 2013
Vision and strategies to Increase Access to Innovative HIV Diagnostic Technologies Willy Urassa 1 Outline Definition Introduction Vision Broad strategies Progress so far Recent experience 2 Expansion of
More informationGeneric Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;
4160-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 15 [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0402] Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public
More informationMedical Device Regulatory Decision Points
Medical Device Regulatory Decision Points Medical Device Classification Benefit Risk Regulatory Path Predicate Devices Valid Scientific Evidence Least Burdensome Approach Medical Devices Classified by
More informationClass II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA
Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA Document issued on: November 12, 2002 This document supersedes the
More informationMedical Devices and the Public s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years. Written Statement of
Medical Devices and the Public s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years Written Statement of Dr. David R. Challoner Vice President for Health Affairs, Emeritus University of Florida and Chair,
More informationtens_(transcutaneous_electrical_nerve_stimulator) 7/ / / /2014 This policy is NOT effective until January 13, 2015
Corporate Medical Policy TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator) File Name: Origination: Last CAP Review: Next CAP Review: Last Review: tens_(transcutaneous_electrical_nerve_stimulator) 7/1982
More informationUse of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations
Guidance for Industry and for FDA Staff Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations Document issued on: March 12, 2000 U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services Food and Drug Administration
More informationANDA Arthur P. Bedrosian, President Armenpharm, Ltd. 49 South Ridge Road P.O. Box D1400 Pomona, NY December 3, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Silver Spring, MD 20993 ANDA 060851 Arthur P. Bedrosian, President Armenpharm, Ltd. 49 South Ridge Road P.O. Box D1400 Pomona, NY 10970 Docket No. FDA-2011-P-0081
More informationTOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?
TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT? Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, MD Deputy Director Division of Individual Health Science Office of Science, CTP Grail Sipes, JD Director Office of Regulatory Policy, CDER Disclaimer:
More informationDraft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Submission and Review of Sterility Information in Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions for Devices Labeled as Sterile DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document
More informationGuidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.
Compounded Drug Products That Are Essentially Copies of a Commercially Available Drug Product Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance
More informationFDLI s Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference. Center for Tobacco Products Office of Compliance and Enforcement 2017 Update
FDLI s Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference Center for Tobacco Products Office of Compliance and Enforcement 2017 Update Ann Simoneau, Director Office of Compliance and Enforcement Center
More informationMEETING THE STANDARDS: FDA MANDATORY RAPID INFLUENZA DETECTION TEST (RIDTs) RECLASSIFICATION
MEETING THE STANDARDS: FDA MANDATORY RAPID INFLUENZA DETECTION TEST (RIDTs) RECLASSIFICATION NOVEMBER 6, 2017 SALLY A. HOJVAT M.Sc., Ph.D. Retired as Director of FDA Division of Microbiology Devices, CDRH
More informationThe Marketing of a Food Ingredient Understanding a System that has Worked for 105 Years
The Marketing of a Food Ingredient Understanding a System that has Worked for 105 Years Gary L. Yingling Food Policy Impact December 2011 Copyright 2011 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Brief Historical
More informationFDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions
FDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions 23 January 2017 On December 27, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug
More informationThe New Regulations - Special IVD Issues
The New Regulations - Special IVD Issues Dirk Stynen, Ph. D. President - Principal Consultant Qarad Geel, Belgium RMD Brussels October 2018 The IVD Regulation 2017/746 October 29, 2018 www.qarad.com 2
More informationPhilip Morris USA Inc. v. FDA
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. FDA STACY L. EHRLICH * AND JAMES WILLIAM WOODLEE ** WHY IT MADE THE LIST Philip Morris v. FDA 1 represents the latest in a string of (generally successful) industry challenges
More informationStatus Update on the Review of DMFs
Status Update on the Review of DMFs Presented by Dave Skanchy, Ph.D. Director DMF Review Staff GPhA/FDA CMC Workshop June 4, 2013 1 Outline Changes to the DMF Review Staff: Update on GDUFA hiring and the
More informationTobacco Product Applications: FDA Perspective
Tobacco Product Applications: FDA Perspective Matthew R. Holman, Ph.D. Director, Office of Science Center for Tobacco Products Disclaimer: This information is not a formal dissemination of information
More informationGenetically Modified Organism (GMO) Legislation and Litigation: Challenges and Opportunities
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Legislation and Litigation: Challenges and Opportunities Food and Drug Conference 2015 Martin J. Hahn, Partner December 14, 2015 What is Genetic Engineering? The application
More informationSubmission to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee inquiry into the Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2016 Measures No.
Submission to the Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee inquiry into the Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2016 Measures No. 1) Bill 2016 Submitted by: Submitted electronically to: Complementary Medicines
More informationMay 16, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20004 2654 Tel: 202 783 8700 Fax: 202 783 8750 www.advamed.org May 16, 2014 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration
More informationACTION: Notification; declaratory order; extension of compliance date.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/21/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-10714, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
More informationCollege of American Pathologists
College of American Pathologists Comments to the Food and Drug Administration on the draft guidance In Vitro Companion Diagnostics Devices October 12, 2011 College of American Pathologists 1350 I Street,
More informationGeneral Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Document issued on: July 29, 2016. The draft of this document was issued on January 20, 2015.
More informationNEURONETICS. 510(k) SUMMARY NEUROSTAR TMS THERAPY SYSTEM'
NEURONETICS 510(k) SUMMARY NEUROSTAR TMS THERAPY SYSTEM' 510(k) Owner: Neuronetics, Inc. DEC 1 6 Z008 1 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 2 Malvern, PA 19355 Phone: 610-640-4202 Fax: 610-640-4206 Company Contact:
More informationPIC/S GUIDANCE ON CLASSIFICATION OF GMP DEFICIENCIES
PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTION CONVENTION PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTION CO-OPERATION SCHEME PI 040-1 3 Appendices 1 January 2019 PIC/S GUIDANCE ON CLASSIFICATION OF GMP DEFICIENCIES PIC/S January 2019 Reproduction
More informationTaylor C. Wallace, PhD, CFS, FACN, March 22, 2018
Food Ingredients Taylor C. Wallace, PhD, CFS, FACN, March 22, 2018 Disclosures Think Healthy Group, Inc. George Mason University, Department of Nutrition and Food Studies Journal of the American College
More informationFebruary 15, AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040
February 15, 2018 AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040 Re: K180137 Trade/Device Name: AtriCure cryoice cryo-ablation probe (CRYO3), AtriCure
More informationCorporate Medical Policy
Corporate Medical Policy TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator) File Name: Origination: Last CAP Review: Next CAP Review: Last Review: tens_(transcutaneous_electrical_nerve_stimulator) 7/1982
More informationOverview of Regulatory Science of Food Contact Substances
Overview of Regulatory Science of Food Contact Substances Michael A. Adams, PhD Deputy Director, Office of Food Additive Safety FDA, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition 5001 Campus Drive, College
More informationFDA Foods Program Update
FDA Foods Program Update Comments by Stephen F. Sundlof, D.V.M., Ph.D. Director Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition JIFSAN Annual Meeting, College Park, MD March 25, 2010 The Food Safety Working
More informationFDA Warning Letters Study
FDA Warning Letters Study A Look at Warning Letters for Pharma/Biotech, Medical Device, and Food & Beverage Industries Since 2007 A Warning Letter is official correspondence that notifies the highest-ranking
More informationRESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS
RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS Office of Research 1. Overview Federal regulations require additional protections for prisoners involved in research. These requirements include, among other things, that research
More informationIn Vitro Diagnostic Glucose Test System
CDRH Final Guidance 2-Page Cover Sheet Guidance for Industry In Vitro Diagnostic Glucose Test System Document issued on: July 6, 1998 U.S. Department Of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
More informationJanuary 7, Dear Ms. Chung:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 January 7, 2015 Jeisys
More informationPutting the Nutritional Supplement Industry to the Test: Looking for Transparency
Putting the Nutritional Supplement Industry to the Test: Looking for Transparency Frederick H. Fern @RickFern_HB ffern@harrisbeach.com Marina Plotkin @MarinaPlotkin_HB mplotkin@harrisbeach.com Putting
More informationGuidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices
Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices An unapproved medical device may normally only be used on human subjects through an approved clinical study in which the subjects meet certain criteria
More informationThe proposed rule is significant, and the requirements and exceptions are complex. Key provisions of the proposal are described below.
ADVISORY Food & Drug FDA ISSUES PROPOSED RULE TO ESTABLISH A UNIQUE DEVICE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL DEVICES July 16, 2012 On July 11, 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published in
More informationLaboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) and the FDA: The Impact on Clinical Laboratories
Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) and the FDA: The Impact on Clinical Laboratories THSNA: Current Challenges in Coagulation Curtis A. Hanson, M.D. Professor of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic
More informationRegulatory Framework for Medical Devices in South Africa. 23 November 2018 Andrea Keyter Deputy Director: Medical Devices
Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices in South Africa 23 November 2018 Andrea Keyter Deputy Director: Medical Devices Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965 (Act 101 of 1965) Act 72 of 2008 and
More informationThe Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 A public consultation Contents Introduction... 3 Why we are consulting... 4 Nutrition and Health Claims... 6 Proposals... 6 Vitamins, minerals, and
More informationUsing Recall Data to Assess the 510(k) Process
Using Recall Data to Assess the 510(k) Process Ralph F. Hall Distinguished Professor and Practitioner University of Minnesota Law School July 28, 2010 Acknowledgments 2 Disclosures 3 Agenda I. Research
More informationPlanning For The FDA s 'Deeming Rule' For E- Cigarettes
Law360, New York (September 21, 2015, 3:39 PM ET) -- The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA)[1] gave the U.S. Food and Drug Administration the authority to oversee the manufacture,
More informationIntroduction to Product Regulation Under the Family Smoking Prevention & Tobacco Control Act
Introduction to Product Regulation Under the Family Smoking Prevention & Tobacco Control Act Presentation for the Tobacco Merchants Association by John Manthei May 23, 2011 Latham & Watkins operates worldwide
More informationFDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality
FDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality Lawrence Deyton, M.S.P.H., M.D. Director, FDA Center for Tobacco Products June 11, 2012 FDA s Vision To make tobaccorelated
More informationNOV Jo 6) ' 510(k) Summary
NOV 2 9 2004Jo 6) ' 510(k) Summary 1. Applicant Amest Corporation 303194 Espetranza Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Contact person: John Jest Amnest Corporation 30394 Espcranza Rancho Santa Margarita,
More informationPolitical Economy of the Medical Products Industry
Political Economy of the Medical Products Industry Tom Hazlet Survey of Biomedical Regulatory Affairs Spring 2008 Menu Definitions medical products political economy Commodities drugs devices biologics
More informationUpdate on WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics
Update on WHO Prequalification of In Vitro Diagnostics Robyn Meurant and Mercedes Perez Gonzalez Prequalification Team Diagnostics Assessment Essential Medicines and Health Products World Health Organization
More informationRe: Docket No. FDA D Presenting Risk Information in Prescription Drug and Medical Device Promotion
1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20024 202-962-9200, www.bio.org August 25, 2009 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville,
More informationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Preface
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Preface Public Comment: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability
More informationperpetuate -- and perhaps even intensify -- that controversy. 1 On July 18th, the Fifth Circuit affirmed FDA s longstanding position that
Food & Drug July 29, 2008 Fifth Circuit Rules that FDA May Regulate Compounded Drugs as New Drugs Update on Medical Center Pharmacy v. Mukasey For decades, the pharmacy compounding industry has disputed
More informationOur medtech experts are yours. 510(k)s for Connected Medical Devices.
Our medtech experts are yours. 510(k)s for Connected Medical Devices. David Amor, MSBE, CQA Principal, Medgineering david@medgineering.com www.medgineering.com Agenda. What is a 510(k)? How do we determine
More informationREGULATORY CHALLENGES IN SOUTH AFRICA
REGULATORY CHALLENGES IN SOUTH AFRICA MEDICINES CONTROL COUNCIL SA Prof Peter Eagles Chairperson Medicines Control Council [Southern African Regional and International Symposium (SARI 2014)] 1 OUTLINE
More informationInternational Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science
International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science 1500 K Street NW Washington DC 20005 Telephone +1 202 230 5607 Fax +1 202 842 8465 Email info@ipacrs.org Web www.ipacrs.org Submitted
More informationFebruary 15, AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040
February 15, 2018 AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040 Re: K180138 Trade/Device Name: AtriCure cryoice cryo-ablation probe (CRYO2) Regulation
More informationIRB review of device studies
Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker 2011 Device Advice from the FDA 2011 Conferences 2011 IRB review of device studies Jonathan M. Green Washington University School of Medicine
More informationRegulatory Update: Food Safety and Nutrition
Regulatory Update: Food Safety and Nutrition Ricardo Carvajal Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. www.hpm.com www.fdalawblog.net North American Millers Association March 2015 Today s Agenda FSMA Update Biological
More informationIRB Policy 5 Research Activities
IRB Policy 5: Research Activities Revision Date: April 16, 2008, revision 12/23/09, revised 1/5/2010, revised January 27, 2011, revised January 14, 2016, revised April 2, 2018, revised 9/14/18 I. Definitions:
More informationTHE US FDA S CUSTOM DEVICE EXEMPTION Practical Solutions for Handling the Sale of Patient-Specific Devices in the USA. August 2011 SPECIAL REPRINT
August 2011 SPECIAL REPRINT UNDERSTANDING THE US FDA S CUSTOM DEVICE EXEMPTION Practical Solutions for Handling the Sale of Patient-Specific Devices in the USA By Danielle Woodlee Reproduced with the kind
More informationGLP Update and Hot Topics
GLP Update and Hot Topics RQA Annual Conference Mark Goodwin 9 Nov 2016 Introduction International GLP Updates OECD including MAD Agreement EC/ EMA US FDA & US EPA UK GLP Update MHRA MHRA GLP Deficiencies
More informationPremarket Review. FFDCA Section 201(s) FFDCA Section 201(s) (cont.)
FFDCA Section 201(s) intended use of which results or may reasonably be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in its becoming a component or otherwise affecting the characteristics of any food Mitchell
More informationFood Additives Program
U.S. FDA s Food Additive Program: An Update on Resources and Challenges 18 th Food Packaging Law Seminar October 11, 2017 Arlington, VA 1 Food Additives Program Dennis Keefe, PhD Director, Office of Food
More information2/17/2018. Prof. Steven S. Saliterman Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota http://saliterman.umn.edu/ FDA Authority Medical Device Act of 1976 FDA Modernization Act of 1997 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
More informationProf. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota http://saliterman.umn.edu/ FDA Authority Medical Device Act of 1976 FDA Modernization Act of 1997 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
More information2014 FDA/JIFSAN Food & Nutrition Webinar
2014 FDA/JIFSAN Food & Nutrition Webinar Medical Foods Shawne Suggs-Anderson, MMSc, _ RD Infant Formula and Medical Foods Staff ONLDS/CFSAN/FDA September 23, 2014 53 Main Objectives History What is a Medical
More informationGlobal Regulation of Food Additives
Chapter 1 Global Regulation of Food Additives Downloaded via 148.251.232.83 on January 28, 2019 at 18:43:58 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published
More informationDETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Page 1 of 6 Human Research Protection Page: 1 of 6 DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS DESCRIPTION Any proposed activity involving contact with
More informationGuide to Interchangeable Medicines
Guide to Interchangeable Medicines AUT-G0115-6 01 JUNE 2018 This guide does not purport to be an interpretation of law and/or regulations and is for guidance purposes only. CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND 3 1.1
More information,,~ 30! Premarket Notification - SomnoMed MAS Flex "S"
510(K) SUMMARY This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness infornation is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR 807.92. Submitter Information: SomnoMed Inc Date Summary Prepared:
More informationSAMED Position: Reuse of SUDs
SAMED Position: Reuse of SUDs What We Will Cover SAMED - who we are and what we do Definition of single-use device Overview of single-use device reprocessing Overview of SA and other countries regulatory
More information