Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom
|
|
- Jemimah Kennedy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Received: 4 August 2017 Revised: 1 January 2018 Accepted: 6 February 2018 DOI: /acm RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom Yuxi Pan Ruijie Yang Jun Li Xile Zhang Lu Liu Junjie Wang Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Ruijie Yang ruijyang@yahoo.com Funding Information National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: , Abstract Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, as the most accurate dose calculation algorithm, is available in the MultiPlan treatment planning system for Cyberknife. The main purpose of this work was to perform experiments to thoroughly investigate the accuracy of the MC dose calculation algorithm. Besides the basic MC beam commissioning, two test scenarios were designed. First, single beam tests were performed with a solid water phantom to verify the MC source model in simple geometry. Then, a lung treatment plan on a CIRS thorax phantom was created to mimic the clinical patient treatment. The plan was optimized and calculated using ray tracing (RT) algorithm and then recalculated using MC algorithm. Measurements were performed in both a homogeneous phantom and a heterogeneous phantom (CIRS). Ion-chamber and radiochromic film were used to obtain absolute point dose and dose distributions. Ion-chamber results showed that the differences between measured and MC calculated dose were within 3% for all tests. On the film measurements, MC calculation results showed good agreements with the measured dose for all single beam tests. As for the lung case, the gamma passing rate between measured and MC calculated dose was 98.31% and 97.28% for homogeneous and heterogeneous situation, respectively, using 3%/2 mm criteria. However, RT algorithm failed with the passing rate of 79.25% (3%/2 mm) for heterogeneous situation. These results demonstrated that MC dose calculation algorithm in the Multiplan system is accurate enough for patient dose calculation. It is strongly recommended to use MC algorithm in heterogeneous media. PACS kd, km KEY WORDS Cyberknife, film measurement, heterogeneous phantom, Monte Carlo 1 INTRODUCTION The accuracy of dose calculation is crucial to the dose delivered to patients receiving radiotherapy which may drastically affect the clinical outcome. 1 Overestimation of the delivered dose may result in the loss of tumor control probability (TCP), and on the other hand, underestimation of the delivered dose may increase the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). 2 Therefore, the accuracy of dose calculation algorithms used in the treatment planning system (TPS) should be investigated thoroughly before clinical practice This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 142 wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jacmp J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:3:
2 PAN ET AL. 143 For Cyberknife (Accuary Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), the TPS (Multiplan V4.6, Accuray Inc.) incorporated two dose algorithms: ray tracing (RT) and Monte Carlo (MC). The RT dose algorithm utilizes the beam data measured in a water tank and the tissue heterogeneity is corrected only along the direction of the primary photons. Heterogeneity effects on scatter dose are not considered in this algorithm. The MC algorithm simulates radiation interactions with tissues and takes into account the lateral electronic disequilibrium. It is considered to be the most accurate algorithm especially for heterogeneous tissues. 3 As with other conventional algorithms, experimental verification forms an integral part of the clinical implementation of MC method. Studies on validation of MC dose calculation have been reported. In 2003, Deng et al. presented a beam commissioning procedure for the MC source model using a set of measurement data, including the central axis depth dose curve, the dose profile and the cone output factors. 4 But this commissioning was performed for their own dual-source model built previously. 5 Dechambre et al. once proposed a novel method for commissioning the MC dose calculation algorithm of Multiplan using a cylindrical 3D-array with variable density inserts. 6 However, the diode spacing of these arrays ( cm) is generally too large for the small field of Cyberknife, thus may not provide sufficient information for dose verification. Currently, radiochromic film measurement is widely accepted for CyberKnife quality assurance (QA). 7,8 In 2008, Wilcox et al. used EBT film to measure dose in heterogeneous slab phantoms for single beams of Cyberknife and compared to dose calculated with both ray tracing and Monte Carlo algorithms. 9 The limitation is that geometry of the slab phantom is obviously much simpler than real patient. Therefore, the effect of geometric heterogeneity on dose was not fully accounted and the relationship between dose distribution and organ location could not be explored. Many studies have been reported to perform dose validation with anthropomorphic phantoms for linear accelerators, but studies for Cyberknife have not been performed in the same scale. In 2010, Sharma et al. used a Radiological Physics Center (RPC) anthropomorphic thorax phantom to validate the accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife. 14 Similarly, in 2015, an Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom was used to verify the dose calculated by MC and RT algorithms. 15 However, film measurements of the two studies were only focused on PTV region. Thus, dose delivered to normal tissues was not evaluated whereas this is one of the important factors need to be considered in radiotherapy. To address these issues, a thorough experimental validation for MC dose calculation of Cyberknife is needed. But to our knowledge, no detailed report of such work has been published so far. In this study, a comprehensive validation procedure of MC algorithm for Cyberknife was established. First, the MC source model established in Multiplan system was validated through a series of measured data required by the commissioning procedure 16,17 together with single beam tests performed in a solid water phantom. Then, a lung case test was carried out to investigate the accuracy of MC algorithm in heterogeneous situation, with a commercially available CIRS thorax phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk, VA, USA). Therefore, the main purpose of this work was to thoroughly investigate the accuracy of the MC algorithm for Cyberknife through experiments performed in a situation similar to clinical practice. 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.A Commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation 2.A.1 MC commissioning procedure The main beam commissioning procedure for MC dose calculation includes the following steps: Acquire and process the required beam data; Import the beam data to the Cyberknife System and review; (c) Generate a calculated source model; (d) Calculate the tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and off-center ratio (OCR) curves using the source model generated in step 3; (e) Compare these MC calculated curves with measurement data. If the results match well, then move to next step; otherwise, make adjustments to the MC source model; (f) Calculate the output factor (OF) for each collimator size using MC algorithm. If the data agree with the measured OF, the commissioning work is finished. 2.A.2 Measurement data required As mentioned earlier, a set of measurement data are required as an input to the beam commissioning procedure. These data include central percent dose depth (PDD), OCR, TPR, and OF. PDD measurements were performed in water for the largest collimator (60 mm) at 800 mm source-to-surface distance (SSD). PTW diode detector was used for the measurements. TPR and OCR beam data were measured for all collimators at a constant source-to-axis distance (SAD) of 800 mm. The TPR data were normalized to the value at the depth of 15 mm. For the OCR measurements, beam data were calculated from sets of orthogonal scans using the IBA scanning system. Different from the commissioning for ray tracing, OF measurement for MC commissioning was performed in air rather than water. Birdcage with diode detector was used for this measurement. For quantitative analysis, the root mean square (RMS) of the difference between measured and MC calculated OCR/TPR was used for all collimators. 2.B Single beam tests Single beam tests were performed with a solid water phantom for five collimator sizes (5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 mm). A EBT3 film was placed in the middle inter-surface of the phantom to acquire dose distribution. Meanwhile, a pinpoint chamber (PTW 31016, active volume: cm 3 ) was inserted into the phantom center to measure point dose. For each collimator, an isocentric plan was created in the Multiplan system. The beam central axis was perpendicular to the anterior surface of the phantom and the isocenter was placed at the center of phantom. The prescription dose was 6 Gy to the isocenter. Tracking
3 144 PAN ET AL. was based on four fiducials within the phantom. Initial calculation was run using RT algorithm, and then, recalculated with MC algorithm. The measured results were compared with calculated data. Before film measurements, a dose calibration was made range from 0.5 to 10 Gy using the 60 mm collimator. The films were placed perpendicular to the central beam axis. All films irradiated in this work were scanned 24 h after exposure using an Epson scanner. Then a calibration curve was obtained using a film analysis software RIT 113 (Radiological Imaging Technology Inc.). 2.C Lung case tests 2.C.1 CT images acquisition For the lung case, a CIRS thorax phantom 002LFC was used to evaluate the accuracy of MC dose calculation in heterogeneous situation (Fig. 1). This phantom is elliptical in shape (30 cm wide 9 30 cm long 9 20 cm thick) to represent average patient size. Three kinds of materials are contained in this phantom to emulate different tissues in human body, including soft tissue, lung, and bone. For the purpose of target localization, four fiducials were implanted into the phantom in a noncoplanar way. The phantom was scanned using Philips Brilliance CT Big Bore with the same protocol for patients (tube voltage: 120 kvp, tube current: 395 mas, slice thickness: 1 mm). Then the reconstructed CT images were imported into Multiplan system. 2.C.2 Treatment planning A treatment plan was created based on the CIRS phantom images to mimic a clinical case of lung cancer. As shown in Fig. 1, a cylinder with diameter of 3 cm and length of 5.5 cm was drawn as PTV inside the right lung. Bilateral lung and spinal cord were contoured as organs at risk (OARs). To compare point dose from calculation and measurement, active volume of the chamber was also contoured. Fiducial tracking was selected as the tracking method, which uses the gold markers preimplanted in or around the target as reference for tracking and 30 mm fixed collimators were used in this plan. And the prescription was 48 Gy in 4 fractions according to RTOG The plan was calculated and optimized using RT algorithm. Then it was recalculated using MC algorithm in high resolution with uncertainty of 1%. Thus, the beam sets and monitor units of the two algorithms for each case were identical. 2.C.3 Measurement in homogeneous phantom Before performing measurements in the heterogeneous CIRS phantom, tests were carried out with homogeneous phantom to investigate to what extent the calculation accuracy can achieve for MC algorithm when no heterogeneity issue involved. QA plans were created by registering the original lung plan to a solid water phantom CT images. The QA plans were calculated using MC and RT algorithm, respectively, and compared with measured results. Since the single fraction dose (12 Gy) was beyond the films calibration range ( Gy), the prescription dose for the QA plans was scaled to 7 Gy. The phantom setup was same as the single beam test described in Section 2.B. The film was placed in the coronal plane for this measurement, which was different from the CIRS phantom configuration. 2.C.4 Measurement in heterogeneous phantom A CIRS phantom was used to present heterogeneity in clinical situations. This phantom includes different rod locations that enable chambers or other dosimeters to be positioned. About half of the phantom is sliced into 1 cm interval, and films can be placed between these layers to measure planar dose. In this study, an ionchamber PTW was inserted into the right lung and EBT3 film was placed at the axial plane next to the chamber. The treatment plan created in Section 2.C.2 was delivered to the CIRS phantom after rescaled to 7 Gy for one fraction, to ensure that the delivered dose is within the film calibration range. In this work, gamma-index method was used for the quantitative analysis of planar dose with a low dose threshold of 10%. It combines both the local percentage dose difference (LDD) and the distance to agreement (DTA) criteria, denoted by LDD%/DTA mm. F IG. 1. Illustration of the PTV location in the CIRS phantom.
4 PAN ET AL. 145 According to AAPM TG 135, a 2%/2 mm criterion was used for the lung case test, requiring a passing rate above 90%. 19 The results were also evaluated using a 3%/2 mm criterion to take into account the dose errors that may be caused by film analysis. For single beam tests, a 3%/1 mm criterion was chosen, considering the tracking accuracy of Cyberknife and higher dose deviation that is likely to occur in the penumbra region. 3 RESULTS 3.A Commissioning results The RMS of TPR is 0.6% averaged for all collimators. And the RMS of OCR is 0.5%. The distance to agreement (DTA) at the OCR penumbra region is within 0.2 mm. The results for 5, 30, and 60 mm collimators are shown in Figs. 2 and 2. Figure 2(c) shows the output factors (OF) derived from MC calculation, together with measured data. All differences over the twelve collimators are within 1% and the maximum difference occurs at the 50 mm collimator (0.71%). 3.B Results for single beam tests As shown in Table 1, the differences between MC calculated and measured chamber dose are within 3%. The gamma passing rates using 3%/1 mm criteria are also summarized in Table 1. Passing rates were superior to 94% for the first four collimators whereas the value dropped to 84.55% for the largest collimator (60 mm). However, the passing rate for 60 mm collimator was improved to 95.33% if using a 3%/2 mm criterion. 3.C Results for lung case tests 3.C.1 Homogeneous phantom Table 2 shows the results for lung treatment plan delivered to a homogeneous solid water phantom. MC and RT dose calculation results were compared with the measured data, respectively. As can be seen, the differences between calculated and measured chamber dose were within 3% for both algorithms. For planar dose, the gamma passing rate for MC algorithm was up to 92.51% and 98.31% using 2%/2 and 3%/2 mm criteria, respectively. RT dose calculation was a little less accurate, especially using a stricter criterion (2%/2 mm). The gamma index maps for MC and RT algorithm were shown in Fig. 3. In both maps, the largest gamma value was found in the same location, which was corresponded to the area near the metal stem of the chamber. 3.C.2 Heterogeneous phantom Figure 4. shows the comparison of planar dose (the layer in which the film was placed) calculated from MC and RT algorithms. For comparison, absolute dose of the two plans were normalized to the prescription dose of 4800 cgy. The isodose line covered PTV was 100% for RT algorithm while only 86% for MC algorithm. F IG. 2. Comparison of MC calculated and measured data for OCR, TPR, and OF (c). T ABLE 1 Comparison of MC calculated and measured dose for single beam tests. Collimator (mm) Chamber dose MC (cgy) Measured (cgy) Difference (%) Gamma passing rate 3%/1 mm (%) Discrepancy can also be observed in the medium-low dose region. The isodose line of 10% which crossed the left lung was much more dispersed for RT algorithm than that for MC algorithm.
5 146 PAN ET AL. T ABLE 2 Comparison of calculated and measured dose for the homogeneous phantom. Chamber dose Gamma passing rate TPS Measured Difference 2%/2 mm 3%/2 mm Algorithm (cgy) (cgy) (%) (%) (%) MC RT F IG. 4. Comparison of MC and RT calculated dose distributions. T ABLE 3 Comparison of calculated and measured dose for the CIRS phantom. Chamber dose Gamma passing rate TPS Measured Difference 2%/2 mm 3%/2 mm Algorithm (cgy) (cgy) (%) (%) (%) MC RT F IG. 3. Gamma index maps between calculated and measured planar dose for the homogeneous phantom. MC vs Measurement. RT vs Measurement. The results of comparison between calculated and measured dose was listed in Table 3. For point dose, the difference between MC calculated and measured dose was less than 1%. However, the difference between RT calculated and measured dose was up to 13.37%. For planar dose, film analysis results show that gamma passing rate for MC algorithm was almost 90% using 2%/2 mm criteria, whereas the result for RT algorithm was very poor. The results of gamma index maps for MC and RT algorithms were shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. The dose differences can be observed more obviously in Figs. 5 and 6, which showed the comparison of dose profile along a Y-direction line through the target. Good agreement was obtained between MC calculation and film measurement. In contrast, significant discrepancy was found for RT results, especially for the target. 4 DISCUSSION Good agreements were obtained between measured and MC calculated commissioning data, including OCR, TPR, and OF, which indicated the MC model established is qualified for treatment planning. For single beam tests, gamma passing rates reached 95% for 5, 10, 20, and 40 mm collimators with 3%/1 mm criteria. The result of 60 mm collimator is a little worse with the passing rate of 84.55%.
6 PAN ET AL. 147 F IG. 5. Comparison of MC calculated and measured dose for the CIRS phantom. Gamma index map. Y dose profile. F IG. 6. Comparison of RT calculated and measured dose for the CIRS phantom. Gamma index map. Y dose profile. By increasing the tolerance of DTA to 2 mm, the passing rate was improved to 95.33%. This indicates that the alignment of MC calculated plane to the film plane is crucial to the large field and a slight shift could cause the sharp rise of gamma value. For the lung case plan delivered to a solid water phantom, the gamma passing rate for MC calculation was 92.51% using a 2%/2 mm criterion. However, RT algorithm showed worse result (86.69%) with the same criteria. The possible reason was that the film plane was very close to the chamber (5 mm) and RT algorithm was not able to properly handle the scatter photons caused by the high-density heterogeneity. The passing rate for RT algorithm was improved to 94.88% by increasing the tolerance of dose difference to 3%. Although the gamma passing rate for MC algorithm was good, slight larger gamma value was also observed around the high-density material for MC algorithm (Fig. 3). This phenomenon was attributed to the limitation of Multiplan s material library. Specifically, material with mass density above g/cc is considered as bone in Multiplan system. This material assignment method could lead to incorrect simulation of physical interactions for high-density metal. Since different materials of similar density could introduce differences in deposited dose, we should be cautious when working at the end of a material s density range. 6,20 The measurement performed in the CIRS thorax phantom showed good agreement to the MC calculation result. The difference between measured and MC calculated chamber dose was within 1%. And the gamma passing rate achieved 89.96% and 97.28% using 2%/2 and 3%/2 mm criteria, respectively. These results verified the ability of the MC algorithm to handle heterogeneous materials. In contrast, RT results showed large discrepancy with the measured data. The RT calculated point dose was 13.37% higher than the chamber measured dose. The data were consistent with a previous study which reported the RT results are 10% higher on average than the measurements in the PTV. 15 And the gamma passing rate for RT algorithm was only 70.30% with 2%/2 mm criterion. Comparing the RT calculated planar dose with film measurement, large discrepancy was found in and around the target, with a maximum dose difference of 15%. The result was reasonable due to the fact that there are no corrections for changes in electron transport or lateral scatter disequilibrium that may happen in the presence of low-density material in RT algorithm. The target dose may be greatly overestimated
7 148 PAN ET AL. by RT algorithm under this situation and consequently the dose delivered to patient is actually lower than the prescribed dose. The clinical outcome for lung tumors between the groups using RT and MC algorithms were initially compared by J.H. Song patients with 47 lung tumors were treated in their study. According to their results, the response rate was lower in the RT group compared to the MC group (77.3% vs 100%). However, the local control rate and toxicities did not differ between the groups. The authors also pointed out that their study has some limitations such as the small number of patients analyzed. Although studies in this regard may need more clinical data, clinical benefit of more accurate dose has been reported. A retrospective study of 201 nonsmall cell lung cancer patients showed that local control was statically significant improved when dose calculation was performed using the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm compared with pencil beam (PB). 22 The former algorithm is widely considered to be more accurate in inhomogeneous media. Moreover, several studies showed that 5% changes in dose can result in 10 20% changes in TCP or up to 20 30% changes in NTCP if the prescribed dose falls in the region with the steepest slope of the dose response curve. 23 Meanwhile, this work proposed a feasible QA approach for clinical dose verification using film and anthropomorphic phantom. Compared to patient QA with solid water phantom, this QA procedure can provide more accurate dose distribution for clinical reference and the time spent remains basically unchanged. 5 CONCLUSION In this work, MC dose calculation was validated through experiments performed with ion-chamber and radiochromic film. The results proved that MC algorithm is accurate enough both in homogenous and heterogeneous situations. In contrast, significant dose discrepancy was observed between the RT calculated and measured results when low-density heterogeneity was present. Therefore, MC algorithm is recommended for dose calculation in heterogeneous media, such as lung tumor. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number , ). CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interest. REFERENCES 1. Papanikolaou N, Battista J, Boyer A, et al. AAPM Report No. 85: Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. Report of Task Group No 65 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Madison, WI: Medical Physics, Martel M, Ten Haken R, Hazuka M, et al. Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distribution of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 1999;24: Toutaoui A, Ait chikh S, Khelassi-Toutaoui N, et al. Monte Carlo photon beam modeling and commissioning for radiotherapy dose calculation algorithm. Phys Med. 2014;30: Deng J, Ma CM, Hai J, et al. Commissioning 6 MV photon beams of a stereotactic radiosurgery system for Monte Carlo treatment planning. Med Phys. 2003;30: Deng J, Guerrero T, Ma C-M, et al. Modelling 6 MV photon beams of a stereotactic radiosurgery system for Monte Carlo treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49: Dechambre D, Baart V, Cucchiaro S, et al. Commissioning Monte Carlo algorithm for robotic radiosurgery using cylindrical 3D-array with variable density inserts. Phys Med. 2017;33: Ho AK, Gibbs IC, Chang SD, et al. The use of TLD and Gafchromic film to assure submillimeter accuracy for image-guided radiosurgery. Med Dosim. 2008;33: Wilcox EE, Daskalov GM. Evaluation of GAFCHROMIC EBT film for Cyberknife dosimetry. Med Phys. 2007;34: Wilcox E, Daskalov G. Accuracy of dose measurements and calculations within and beyond heterogeneous tissues for 6 MV photon fields smaller than 4 cm produced by Cyberknife. Med Phys. 2008;35: Schiefer H, Fogliata A, Nicolini G, et al. The Swiss IMRT dosimetry intercomparison using a thorax phantom. Med Phys. 2010;37: Polednik M, Madyan YA, Schneider F, et al. Evaluation of calculation algorithms implemented in different commercial planning systems on an anthropomorphic breast phantom using film dosimetry. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007;183: Fleckenstein J, Jahnke L, Lohr F, et al. Development of a Geant4 based Monte Carlo Algorithm to evaluate the MONACO VMAT treatment accuracy. Z Med Phys. 2013;23: Zhang A, Wen N, Nurushev T, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14: Sharma SC, Ott JT, Williams JB, et al. Clinical implications of adopting Monte Carlo treatment planning for CyberKnife. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11: Koksal C, Akbas U, Okutan M, et al. Comparison of dose distributions calculated by the cyberknife Monte Carlo and ray tracing algorithms for lung tumors: a phantom study. EPJ Web Conf. 2015;100: Accuray Incorporated. Physics essentials guide, Accuray Incorporated. Treatment planning manual, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing 2 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Schedules for Medically Inoperable Patients with Stage I Peripheral Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. RTOG Philadelphia, PA: RTOG, Dieterich S, Cavedon C, Chuang CF, et al. Report of AAPM TG 135: quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2011;38: Zhang RR, Feygelman V, Harris ER, et al. Is wax equivalent to tissue in electron conformal therapy planning? A Monte Carlo study of material approximation introduced dose difference. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14: Song JH, Kang KM, Choi HS, et al. Comparing the clinical outcomes in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors between Ray-Tracing and Monte-Carlo algorithms. Oncotarget. 2016;7: Latifi K, Oliver J, Baker R, et al. Study of 201 non-small cell lung cancer patients given stereotactic ablative radiation therapy shows local control dependence on dose calculation algorithm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88: Chetty I, Curran B, Cygler JE, et al. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys. 2007;34:
Disclosure. Outline. Machine Overview. I have received honoraria from Accuray in the past. I have had travel expenses paid by Accuray in the past.
Clinical Implementation of the CyberKnife Disclosure I have received honoraria from Accuray in the past. I have had travel expenses paid by Accuray in the past. Mary Ellen Masterson-McGary McGary CyberKnife
More informationAssessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom
Assessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom David Followill, Ph.D. Associate Director Radiological Physics Center RPC History Lesson
More information4 Essentials of CK Physics 8/2/2012. SRS using the CyberKnife. Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest
SRS using the CyberKnife Sonja Dieterich, PhD, DABR Associate Professor University of California Davis Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest Consulting agreements with Broncus Medical and CyberHeart, Inc. Scientific
More informationIMRT QUESTIONNAIRE. Address: Physicist: Research Associate: Dosimetrist: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)
IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE Institution: Date: / / Address: Physicist: e-mail: Telephone: Fax: Research Associate: email: Telephone: Fax: Dosimetrist: email: Telephone: Fax: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)
More informationThe Accuracy of 3-D Inhomogeneity Photon Algorithms in Commercial Treatment Planning Systems using a Heterogeneous Lung Phantom
The Accuracy of 3-D Inhomogeneity Photon Algorithms in Commercial Treatment Planning Systems using a Heterogeneous Lung Phantom Gary Fisher, B.S. David Followill, Ph.D. Geoffrey Ibbott, Ph.D. This investigation
More informationImplementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Implementation of radiosurgery and SBRT requires a fundamentally sound approach Errors don t blur out
More informationThe Journey of Cyberknife Commissioning
The Journey of Cyberknife Commissioning Jun Yang Ph.D 1, Alan Cohen M.S. 2 1) Adjunct Associate Professor Drexel University Alliance Oncology 2) Chief Medical Physicist Accuray Incorporated X-ray Sources
More informationCan we hit the target? Can we put the dose where we want it? Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy David Shepard, Ph.D. Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, WA Timothy D. Solberg, Ph.D. University of Texas Southwestern
More informationSRS Uncertainty: Linac and CyberKnife Uncertainties
SRS Uncertainty: Linac and CyberKnife Uncertainties Sonja Dieterich, PhD Linac/CyberKnife Technological Uncertainties 1 Linac Mechanical/Radiation Isocenters Depuydt, Tom, et al. "Computer aided analysis
More informationOut-of-field doses of CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients
EURAMED,MELODI and EURADOS Workshop, Helsinki 19.-20.4.2017 Out-of-field doses of CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients Jan Seppälä, Chief Physicist Tuomas Virén, Medical
More informationNormal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT
Received: 28 September 2017 Revised: 17 November 2017 Accepted: 28 December 2017 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12276 RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using
More informationQA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials
QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff G. Ibbott, AAPM Summer School, June 24, 2009 1 QA Infrastructure for Clinical Trials Participating Institutions
More informationQuality Assurance of TPS: comparison of dose calculation for stereotactic patients in Eclipse and iplan RT Dose
Petrovic B Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for stereotaxy Quality Assurance of TPS: comparison of dose calculation for stereotactic patients in and RT Dose Borislava Petrovic 1, Aleksandra Grządziel
More informationWhat Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff
What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff Clinical NCI Trials CALGB 1768 Participating Institutions NCCTG ECOG COG ACOSOG SWOG QARC RPC ATC RTOG
More informationIntensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies ICPT School on Medical Physics for Radiation Therapy Justus Adamson PhD Assistant Professor Department of Radiation
More informationPatient-specific quality assurance for intracranial cases in robotic radiosurgery system
JBUON 2018; 23(1): 179-184 ISSN: 1107-0625, online ISSN: 2241-6293 www.jbuon.com E-mail: editorial_office@jbuon.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Patient-specific quality assurance for intracranial cases in robotic
More informationHot Topics in SRS: Small Field Dosimetry & Other Treatment Uncertainties. Sonja Dieterich, PhD University of California Davis
Hot Topics in SRS: Small Field Dosimetry & Other Treatment Uncertainties Sonja Dieterich, PhD University of California Davis Lecture in Two Parts SRS Dosimetry Other Uncertainties SRS DOSIMETRY Outline
More informationHeterogeneity Corrections in Clinical Trials
Heterogeneity Corrections in Clinical Trials Niko Papanikolaou Departments of Radiology and Radiation Oncology U of TX Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX Eric Klein Department of Radiation Oncology
More informationLeila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital
2 nd UK and Ireland Dosimetry Check User Meeting Symposium Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, 24 th October 2012 Leila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital Leila.Nichol@nhs.net *My experience with Dosimetry
More informationTransition to Heterogeneity Corrections. Why have accurate dose algorithms?
Transition to Heterogeneity Corrections Eric E. Klein, M.S., Washington University, St. Louis, MO Craig Stevens, M.D., Ph.D., MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Nikos Papinikolou, Ph.D., University
More informationVerification of treatment planning system parameters in tomotherapy using EBT Radiochromic Film
Verification of treatment planning system parameters in tomotherapy using EBT Radiochromic Film E.B.Rajmohan¹, Pratik Kumar¹, Bhudatt Paliwal,² David Westerly², N.Gopishankar³, R.K.Bisht³, D.Tewatia²,
More informationAn anthropomorphic head phantom with a BANG polymer gel insert for dosimetric evaluation of IMRT treatment delivery
An anthropomorphic head phantom with a BANG polymer gel insert for dosimetric evaluation of IMRT treatment delivery G. Ibbott a, M. Beach a, M. Maryanski b a M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,
More informationTopics covered 7/21/2014. Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy
Radiation Dosimetry for Proton Therapy Narayan Sahoo Department of Radiation Physics University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center Houston, USA Topics covered Detectors used for to
More informationAAPM Task Group 180 Image Guidance Doses Delivered During Radiotherapy: Quantification, Management, and Reduction
AAPM Task Group 180 Image Guidance Doses Delivered During Radiotherapy: Quantification, Management, and Reduction Parham Alaei, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota NCCAAPM Fall
More informationSTEREOTACTIC DOSE VERIFICATION PHANTOM VERSATILE STEREOTACTIC QA PHANTOMS
PHANTOMS VERSATILE STEREOTACTIC QA For fast and accurate commissioning of Accuray CyberKnife treatment systems and patient specific dose verification plans STEREOTACTIC DOSE VERIFICATION PHANTOM Stereotactic
More informationLung Spine Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Spine Phantom. MARCH 2014
Lung Spine Phantom Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Spine Phantom. MARCH 2014 The study groups are requesting that each institution keep the phantom for no more than 2 week. During this
More informationA comparison of dose distributions measured with two types of radiochromic film dosimeter MD55 and EBT for proton beam of energy 175 MeV
A comparison of dose distributions measured with two types of radiochromic film dosimeter MD55 and EBT for proton beam of energy 175 MeV M. Mumot, G. V. Mytsin, Y. I. Luchin and A. G. Molokanov Medico-Technical
More informationAssessment of Dosimetric Functions of An Equinox 100 Telecobalt Machine
2017 IJSRST Volume 3 Issue 3 Print ISSN: 2395-6011 Online ISSN: 2395-602X Themed Section: Science and Technology Assessment of Dosimetric Functions of An Equinox 100 Telecobalt Machine Samuel Nii Adu Tagoe
More informationCyberKnife Technology in Ablative Radiation Therapy. Jun Yang PhD Cyberknife Center of Philadelphia Drexel University Jan 2017
CyberKnife Technology in Ablative Radiation Therapy Jun Yang PhD Cyberknife Center of Philadelphia Drexel University Jan 2017 Objectives Components and work flow of CyberKnife Motion management of CyberKnife
More informationStereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Lesions using the CyberKnife of-the-art and New Innovations
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Lesions using the CyberKnife State-of of-the-art and New Innovations Chad Lee, PhD CK Solutions, Inc. and CyberKnife Centers of San Diego Outline Basic overview
More informationEORTC Member Facility Questionnaire
Page 1 of 9 EORTC Member Facility Questionnaire I. Administrative Data Name of person submitting this questionnaire Email address Function Phone Institution Address City Post code Country EORTC No Enter
More informationMonte Carlo Dose Calculation for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology Fox Chase Cancer
More informationEvaluation of Dosimetry Check software for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, 2015 Evaluation of Dosimetry Check software for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance Ganesh Narayanasamy, Travis Zalman, Chul S. Ha,
More informationCalibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA
Calibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA G Ramanathan 1, C.Oliver 1, D J Butler 1, P D Harty 1, Viliami Takau 1 Tracy Wright 1 and Tom Kupfer 2 1 Australian Radiation Protection
More informationIROC Liver Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Liver Phantom. Revised July 2015
IROC Liver Phantom Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Liver Phantom. Revised July 2015 The study groups are requests that each institution keep the phantom for no more than 2 weeks. During
More informationThe RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies. AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff
The RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff 1 http://rpc.mdanderson.org Supported by: NCI grants CA10953 and CA81647, and an
More informationIROC Lung Phantom 3D CRT / IMRT. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Lung Phantom. Revised Dec 2015
IROC Lung Phantom 3D CRT / IMRT Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Lung Phantom. Revised Dec 2015 The IROC requests that each institution keep the phantom for no more than 2 weeks. During
More informationStereotaxy. Outlines. Establishing SBRT Program: Physics & Dosimetry. SBRT - Simulation. Body Localizer. Sim. Sim. Sim. Stereotaxy?
Establishing SBRT Program: Physics & Dosimetry Lu Wang, Ph.D. Radiation Oncology Department Fox Chase Cancer Center Outlines Illustrate the difference between SBRT vs. CRT Introduce the major procedures
More informationData Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials. July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff
Data Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff RPC Programs Assure... Constancy of basic machine calibration (TLD/OSLD Audits) Validity of treatment
More informationMAX-HD SRS PHANTOM THE COMPREHENSIVE END-TO-END SRS PHANTOM SCAN PLAN LOCALIZE TREAT. distributed by:
SRS PHANTOM SCAN PLAN LOCALIZE TREAT THE COMPREHENSIVE END-TO-END SRS PHANTOM distributed by: Tel: +33 (0) 42 88 68 41 info@orion-france.com www.orion-france.com 2, Avenue du General Balfourier 75016 Paris,
More informationActivity report from JCOG physics group
2013.5.9 Global Harmonization Group meeting ICCR2013 @ Melbourne Activity report from JCOG physics group 1 Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Medicine, 2 National Cancer Center, Center for Cancer
More informationRPC Liver Phantom Highly Conformal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
RPC Liver Phantom Highly Conformal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the RPC Liver Phantom. Revised Dec 2005 Credentialing for this protocol requires four steps:
More informationDosimetric verification and quality assurance of runningstart-stop (RSS) delivery in tomotherapy
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 6, 2015 Dosimetric verification and quality assurance of runningstart-stop (RSS) delivery in tomotherapy Francis Kar-ho Lee, a Simon Kar-yiu
More informationMeasurement Guided Dose Reconstruction (MGDR) Transitioning VMAT QA from phantom to patient geometry
Measurement Guided Dose Reconstruction (MGDR) Transitioning VMAT QA from phantom to patient geometry Raj Varadhan, PhD, DABMP Minneapolis Radiation Oncology Conflict of interest None Acknowledgement: Jim
More informationTechnical Study. Institution University of Texas Health San Antonio. Location San Antonio, Texas. Medical Staff. Daniel Saenz. Niko Papanikolaou.
Technical Study Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Elekta Versa HD and Monaco Accuracy of a single isocenter, multiple brain metastases VMAT plan delivered to a pseudo-patient dosimetric gel phantom Institution
More informationLinac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR
Linac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR PhD, FAAPM, FACR, FASTRO Department of Radiation Oncology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA Indra J. Das,
More informationRPC s Credentialing Programs for Clinical Trials
RPC s Credentialing Programs for Clinical Trials July 19, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff Mission The mission of the Radiological Physics Center is to assure NCI and the Cooperative Groups
More informationSBRT fundamentals. Outline 8/2/2012. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Educational Session
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Educational Session J Perks PhD, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento CA SBRT fundamentals Extra-cranial treatments Single or small number (2-5) of
More informationRADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident
Resident s Name: RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident Rotation: PHYS 703: Clinical Rotation 2 Inclusive dates of rotation: Feb. 26, 2016 Aug. 25, 2016 Director or Associate
More informationUnrivaled, End-to-End
PHANTOMS Unrivaled, End-to-End Stereotactic QA Industry-leading 0.1mm accuracy minimizes errors at each link in the stereotactic quality assurance chain. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is governed by
More informationBorges C 1, Zarza- Moreno M 2, Teixeira N 2, Vaz P 3 1
Borges C 1, Zarza- Moreno M 2, Teixeira N 2, Vaz P 3 1 Medicalconsult SA, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 Escola Superior de Tecnologias da Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal; 3 InsEtuto Tecnológico e Nuclear, InsEtuto Superior
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons
Texas Medical Center Library DigitalCommons@TMC UT GSBS Dissertations and Theses (Open Access) Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 8-2012 EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANISOTROPIC ANALYTICAL ALGORITHM
More informationAccuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy
Departments of Oncology and Medical Biophysics Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy Introduction and Overview 6 August 2013 Jacob (Jake) Van Dyk Conformality 18 16
More informationM. J. Maryanski, Three Dimensional BANG Polymer Gel Dosimeters AAPM'99, CE Course
Three Dimensional BANG Polymer Gel Dosimeters Marek J. Maryanski MGS Research, Inc. Guilford, CT Educational objectives: Describe the need for high-resolution 3D dosimetry in 3D CRT. Explain the physics
More informationLevel of Accuracy Practically Achievable in Radiation Therapy. David Followill and RPC staff August 6, 2013
Level of Accuracy Practically Achievable in Radiation Therapy David Followill and RPC staff August 6, 2013 Sources of Treatment Uncertainty Machine functioning Radiation dose determination Patient specific
More informationCredentialing for the Use of IGRT in Clinical Trials
Credentialing for the Use of IGRT in Clinical Trials James M. Galvin, DSc Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Jefferson Medical College Philadelphia, PA and The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RADIATION
More informationVerification of performance of Acuros XB Algorithm (AXB) Implemented on Eclipse Planning System
Original Article Research in Oncology 2018; Vol. 14, No. 1: 34-38. DOI: 10.21608/resoncol.2018.3026.1047 Verification of performance of Acuros XB Algorithm (AXB) Implemented on Eclipse Planning System
More informationEvaluation of Dynamic Delivery Quality Assurance Process for Internal Target Volume Based RapidArc
Original Article PMP Progress in Medical Physics 28(4), December 217 https://doi.org/1.14316/pmp.217.28.4.181 pissn 258-4445, eissn 258-4453 Evaluation of Dynamic Delivery Quality Assurance Process for
More informationPGY-1. Resident Review Session Schedule
1. August Simulation & Treatment 1.1. Sim Setup 1.2. Sim Techniques 1.3. 4DCT 1.4. Breath Hold / Gating 1.5. Treatment Setup 1.6. Treatment Delivery 1.7. Filming 1.7.1. Port film 1.7.2. kv 1.7.3. CBCT
More informationIROC Head and Neck Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised MARCH 2014
IROC Head and Neck Phantom Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised MARCH 2014 The study groups are requesting that each institution keep the phantom for a period of time
More informationMVCT Image. Robert Staton, PhD DABR. MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando. ACMP Annual Meeting 2011
MVCT Image Guidance and QA Robert Staton, PhD DABR MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando ACMP Annual Meeting 2011 Disclosures MDACCO has received grant funding from TomoTherapy, Inc. Overview TomoTherapy MVCT
More informationDevelopment and evaluation of an end-to-end test for head and neck IMRT with a novel multiple-dosimetric modality phantom
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, 2016 Development and evaluation of an end-to-end test for head and neck IMRT with a novel multiple-dosimetric modality phantom Viatcheslav
More informationIndependent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo. C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Independent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA Outline Why Monte Carlo for IMRT QA? Experimental verification
More informationMeasurement of Dose to Implanted Cardiac Devices in Radiotherapy Patients
Measurement of Dose to Implanted Cardiac Devices in Radiotherapy Patients Moyed Miften, PhD Professor and Chief Physicist University of Colorado Chester Reft, PhD Associate Professor University of Chicago
More informationBasic dosimetric data for treatment planning system
Measurement of relative output factors for Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion, BrainLAB m3 multi-leaf collimator and Accuray CyberKnife fixed and Iris collimators by PTW 60019 MicroDiamond detector J. Novotny
More informationS. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned
S. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATORS Electron beam (MeV) Photon beam (MV) PRECISION REQUIRED IN RADIOTHERAPY
More information8/2/2018. Disclosure. Online MR-IG-ART Dosimetry and Dose Accumulation
Online MR-IG-ART Dosimetry and Dose Accumulation Deshan Yang, PhD, Associate Professor Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine Washington University in Saint Louis 1 Disclosure Received research
More informationSmall field diode dosimetry
Small field diode dosimetry Parham Alaei, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology University of Minnesota NCCAAPM Symposium-October 10, 2013 1 Diodes as beam data collection detectors Diodes as in vivo
More informationROPES eye plaque dosimetry: commissioning and verification of an ophthalmic brachytherapy treatment planning system
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2013 ROPES eye plaque dosimetry: commissioning
More informationJOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 4, FALL 2003
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 4, FALL 2003 Reference photon dosimetry data: A preliminary study of in-air off-axis factor, percentage depth dose, and output factor of the
More informationDose differences between the three dose calculation algorithms in Leksell GammaPlan
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 5, 2014 Dose differences between the three dose calculation algorithms in Leksell GammaPlan Andy (Yuanguang) Xu, 1a Jagdish Bhatnagar 1, Greg
More informationLimits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems
Limits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems Jean M. Moran, Ph.D. 1 and Timothy Ritter, Ph.D. 2 1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2 Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Hospital, Ann
More informationClinical Implementation of SRS/SBRT
Clinical Implementation of SRS/SBRT Anil Sethi, PhD, FAAPM Loyola University Medical Center November 4, 2017 Disclosures Speaker: BrainLAB Standard Imaging Research collaboration: RaySearch 2 Learning
More informationMania Aspradakis John Byrne Hugo Palmans John Conway Jim Warrington Karen Rosser Simon Duane
Mania Aspradakis John Byrne Hugo Palmans John Conway Jim Warrington Karen Rosser Simon Duane Why are we concerned with small MV photon fields? SRS dosimetry Total scatter factor with various detectors
More informationDiode calibration for dose determination in total body irradiation
Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2008; 6 (1): 43-50 Diode calibration for dose determination in total body irradiation M.Allahverdi 1*, Gh. Geraily 1, M. Esfehani 3,A. Sharafi 2,A. Shirazi 1 1 Department of Medical
More informationD DAVID PUBLISHING. Uncertainties of in vivo Dosimetry Using Semiconductors. I. Introduction. 2. Methodology
Journal of Life Sciences 9 (2015) 120-126 doi: 10.17265/1934-7391/2015.03.005 D DAVID PUBLISHING Uncertainties of in vivo Dosimetry Using Semiconductors Zeina Al Kattar, Hanna El Balaa and Saeed Zahran
More informationAdditional Questions for Review 2D & 3D
Additional Questions for Review 2D & 3D 1. For a 4-field box technique, which of the following will deliver the lowest dose to the femoral heads? a. 100 SSD, equal dmax dose to all fields b. 100 SSD, equal
More informationA preliminary clinic dosimetry study for synchrotron radiation therapy at SSRF
Nuclear Science and Techniques 24 (2013) 060102 A preliminary clinic dosimetry study for synchrotron radiation therapy at SSRF LI Zhaobin SHI Zeliang ZHANG Qing WANG Yong FU Shen * The 6 th People s Hospital
More informationph fax
This product is available through: JRT Associates www.standardimaging.com 800-261-4446. ph 608-831-0025. fax 608-831-2202 5 Nepperhan Avenue, Suite 2B 3120 Deming Way Middleton WIElmsford, 53562-1461 NY
More informationVerification of Relative Output Factor (ROF) Measurement for Radiosurgery Small Photon Beams
Verification of Relative Output Factor (ROF) Measurement for Radiosurgery Small Photon Beams Reduan A a, Mazurawati M b, Nur Iziana M a, Nik Ruzman NI b, Ahmad Z a and Ahmad Lutfi Y b a School of Health
More informationIntroduction. Measurement of Secondary Radiation for Electron and Proton Accelerators. Introduction - Photons. Introduction - Neutrons.
Measurement of Secondary Radiation for Electron and Proton Accelerators D. Followill, Ph.D. Radiological Physics Center U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Introduction Patients undergoing radiation therapy
More informationProtons Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
Protons Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry T Gorjiara, Z Kuncic, J Adamovics and C Baldock 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 444 012090 PRESAGE is a radiochromic
More informationVerification of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Verification of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques Catharine Clark, PhD Principal Research Scientist Radiation Dosimetry group and Consultant Clinical Scientist Royal Surrey County Hospital 2 nd December
More informationIndependent corroboration of monitor unit calculations performed by a 3D computerized planning system
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 1, NUMBER 4, FALL 2000 Independent corroboration of monitor unit calculations performed by a 3D computerized planning system Konrad W. Leszczynski* and
More informationAssessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, 2015 Assessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit
More informationA VMAT PLANNING SOLUTION FOR NECK CANCER PATIENTS USING THE PINNACLE 3 PLANNING SYSTEM *
Romanian Reports in Physics, Vol. 66, No. 2, P. 401 410, 2014 A VMAT PLANNING SOLUTION FOR NECK CANCER PATIENTS USING THE PINNACLE 3 PLANNING SYSTEM * M. D. SUDITU 1,2, D. ADAM 1,2, R. POPA 1,2, V. CIOCALTEI
More informationTreatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI)
Treatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) Tagreed AL-ALAWI Medical Physicist King Abdullah Medical City- Jeddah Aim 1. Simplify and standardize
More informationIROC Prostate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IROC IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014
IROC Prostate Phantom Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IROC IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014 The study groups are requesting that each institution keep the phantom for a period of time
More informationIMRT QA: Point Dose Measurements or 2D Array?
QA for IMRT IMRT QA: Point Dose Measurements or D Array? General Linac QA for IMRT MLC checks Dose linearity at low MU Patient-specific measurements Performed using various methods Purpose is to verify
More informationProstate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014
Prostate Phantom Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION: Each institution may keep the phantom for a period of time no more than 2 weeks.
More informationProtection of the contralateral breast during radiation therapy for breast cancer
Protection of the contralateral breast during radiation therapy for breast cancer Edgardo Garrigó a*, Alejandro Germanier b, Silvia Zunino a a Instituto Privado de Radioterapia, Ob Oro 423 (5000) Córdoba,
More informationQuality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques
TROG 08.03 RAVES Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques Introduction Commissioning and quality assurance of planning systems and treatment delivery
More informationDosimetric study of 2D ion chamber array matrix for the modern radiotherapy treatment verification
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, SPRING 2010 Dosimetric study of 2D ion chamber array matrix for the modern radiotherapy treatment verification Sathiyan Saminathan, a Ravikumar
More information8/2/2018. Disclosures. In ICRU91: SRT = {SBRT/SABR, SRS}
High Dose, Small Field Radiation Therapy: Lessons from the HyTEC Project and the ICRU 91 Report Part 1: Small Field Dosimetry Jan Seuntjens, Ph.D, FCCPM, FAAPM, FCOMP Director and Professor, Medical Physics
More informationTolerance levels of CT number to electron density table for photon beam in radiotherapy treatment planning system
Received: 19 July 2017 Revised: 30 August 2017 Accepted: 17 October 2017 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12226 TECHNICAL NOTE Tolerance levels of CT number to electron density table for photon beam in radiotherapy treatment
More informationVerification of micro-beam irradiation
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Verification of micro-beam irradiation To cite this article: Qiongge Li et al 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 573 012047 View the article online for updates
More informationAnthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 5, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2004 Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification 1 2 3 4 José A. Bencomo, 5 Connel Chu, Victor M.
More informationEvaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases
Evaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases CASE STUDY Institution: Odette Cancer Centre Location: Sunnybrook
More informationVarian Edge Experience. Jinkoo Kim, Ph.D Henry Ford Health System
Varian Edge Experience Jinkoo Kim, Ph.D Henry Ford Health System Disclosures I participate in research funded by Varian Medical Systems. Outline of Presentation Review advanced imaging in Varian Edge Linear
More information