Human longevity: latest insights. Dr Christoph Nabholz, Head R&D Life & Health, NGIC June 2017
|
|
- Kathryn Parrish
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Human longevity: latest insights Dr Christoph Nabholz, Head R&D Life & Health, NGIC June 2017
2 Age adjusted deaths rates and life expectancy developments in the US Source: 2
3 To further improve life expectancy mortality, improvements have to come from age associated chronic diseases Hygiene Food 100 Antibiotics Sanitation Statins Smoker campaigns Delay of old age mortality over 80 years years years years 0-14 years Infant mortality reduction Source: Christensen et al.; Lancet 2009; 374: Age-specific contributions to life expectancy in women from 1850 to
4 Life expectancy rates are a result of dynamic changes in disease management Source: 4
5 Mortality rates per 100,000 (age adjusted) In the US, CVD and cancer mortality have improved, while diabetes and COPD have increased over the last decades General population statistics Source: Global Burden of Disease % change Heart diseases Cancer Stroke COPD Transport injuries Diabetes COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
6 For the first time in more than two decades, life expectancy in the US declined Life expectancy fell by 0.1 year in 2015 The overall death rate rose 1.2% in 2015, its first uptick since 1999 Life expectancy last fell during the peak of the HIV/Aids crisis in 1993 Possible drivers: obesity levels, ageing population, economic struggles and drug misuse Mortality rates for people in their 30s, 40s and 50s, are flat or increasing Source: NCHS Data Brief No. 267, Dec
7 US death rates rose for eight of the top 10 leading causes of death in 2015 Heart disease increased (+0.9%) Ramifications of obesity? Death rate from cancer declined (-1.7%) fewer people are smoking, early detection, new treatments Largest rate jump - Alzheimer s (+15.7%) Unintentional injuries (+6.7%) Overdoses from drugs, alcohol and other chemicals Motor vehicle crashes and other accidents Stroke (+3%), Diabetes (+1.9%), Kidney disease (+1.5%), Suicide (+2.3%) Source: NCHS Data Brief No. 267, Dec
8 Mortality in England and Wales was reversed in 2011 with 2015 being one of the largest increases in deaths in the post-war period Age-standardised death rate per 100,000 England and Wales, Percentage increase in death rates at individual years; 2014 to 2015 in England and Wales Dementia was the major contributor, based on reported causes of death Excess deaths are in the older population, who are most dependent on health and social care Source: Hiam et al
9 % total death High-Income Countries, Global mortality projection 2030 shows differential outcomes by disease Rank Cause Ischaemic heart disease Stroke Alzheimer's disease and other dementias Trachea, bronchus, lung cancers Lower respiratory infections Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Colon and rectum cancers Diabetes mellitus Hypertensive heart disease Kidney diseases Pancreas cancer Breast cancer Prostate cancer Stomach cancer Lymphomas, multiple myeloma Self-harm Liver cancer Cirrhosis of the liver Falls Endocrine, blood, immune disorders % deaths Deaths per 100, % deaths Deaths per 100, Source: WHO Global Health Estimates 9
10 International life expectancy projected for males at age Source: Canada Pension Plan Projection; Ménard,
11 Where will future improvements come from? 11
12 Bio-medical technology and behavioural change are believed to be the major forces shaping future mortality 8% Bio-medical technology 9% 29% Behavioral changes Health care systems 9% New/resurgent diseases Population composition Environmental changes 17% 28% Source: National Population Projections Expert Advisory Group
13 Top 10 risk factors that account for mortality in the USA in 2015 Diabetes CVD Cancer Source: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Compare. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington, Available from Accessed 22 March
14 14
15 Interventions that slow ageing will have a greater effect on quality of life compared to disease specific approaches Disease specific approach allows to live longer but suffering from multiple diseases or disabilities This increases the need for care of elderly patients living in reduced quality of life Biology of ageing aims at enhancing healthy longevity; addresses the longevity dividend Ageing diseases: Heart disease, diabetes, cancer, dementia Key criteria: Ease of implementation What is missing? Lack of biomarkers: required true ageing biomarkers (epigenetic, metabolomic etc) Missing FDA approval: may yet not be possible to receive approval for ageing intervention TAME trials: Targeting Ageing with Metformin; expected delay in order of 15-30%; first possible case for FDA approval Open question: will future centenarians have fulfilling lives with sudden collapse or suffer from multiple chronic diseases Effective when started in mid-life Benefits outweigh the risk 15
16 Ageing interventions aim at enhancing healthy longevity Promising ageing interventions: Dietary restriction: while not universally applicable to lab models, it shows significant increases in life span Exercise: proven enhanced health span but poor compliance in elderly patients mtor inhibitors: rapamycin expands life span in mice; reverses cardiac decline and improves immune function (rejuvenate immune stem cells) Metformin and acarbose: antidiabetic drugs that expand life span Insulin response; Diabetes; Cardiac health; Immune response Modifiers of senescence: telomere dysfunction leads to senescence Hormonal and circulating factors: sex-steroids, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor; blood donation from young adults increases life span in mice; Alzheimer tests with plasma ongoing NAD precursors and sirtuin activators: improve health span; muscle ageing and cognitive decline Mitochondria therapeutics: free radical theory; augmented mitochondrial function (energy, biogenesis, antioxidants, NAD precursor) Programmed cell death; Hormone lifecycle; Mitochondrial function; Cognitive health 16
17 Top bio-medical advances that reduce mortality are addressing disease monitoring, diagnostics and medical interventions Therapy Technology innovation Heart disease management improves Minimally invasive and robotic surgery Combination drug therapy extends HIV survival CT, MRI and functional MRI scanning Hepatitis C cure comes to market Targeted cancer immuno therapy matures ehealth and telemedicine Mobile biovital sign monitoring Genetic medicine 17
18 Clinical trial landscape for cancer, CVD and Alzheimer s PHASE PHASE 1 40 PHASE 2 AD Source: CVD 615 PHASE PHASE 4 Cancer 18
19 Disruptive technologies with potential high impact to health outcomes The Internet of Things Next-generation genomics Health and chronic disease monitoring Advanced robotics Robotic surgery and prosthetics Near-autonomous vehicles Reduction in car accidents Source: McKinsey Global Institute 2013 Predictive health analytics 3D printing Organ bioprinting Advanced materials Nanodrugs 19
20 Genetic Medicine Next-generation genomics 20
21 Rapid evolution of genetic testing technologies observed since the human genome sequence in 2003 Whole Exome Sequencing Single Gene Testing Whole Genome Sequencing Gene Panels
22 Full genome sequencing has becomes affordable $100'000'000 Sequencing costs per genome $10'000'000 $1M genome 2008 $1'000'000 $100'000 $10K genome 2011 $10'000 $1'000 $100 genome? $100 Sanger sequencing Source: NIH National Human Genome Research Institute Next generation sequencing Emerging sequencing technologies 22
23 Over the last two decades many cancer genes have been identified with various relative cancer risks in different cancer sites Cancer site Relative Risk 5.0 Family studies Relative Risk 1.5 and >5.0 Resequencing Relative Risk 1.01and >1.5 Genome-wide association studies Lung RB1, TP53 Breast BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, SK11, CDH1 CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, BRIP1 CASP8, FGFR2, MAP3K1, 8q24, 5p, TOX3, 2q, 6q22, LSP1 Colon and rectum APC, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 APC (I1307K), BLM MUTYH, CASP8, 8q24, 8q23 (EIF3H), 10p14, 11q23, CRAC1, SMAD7 Prostate BRCA2 8q24 rs , rs721048, NBS1, EHBP1, TCF2, CTBP2, JAZF1, MSMB, LMTK2, KLK3, SLC22A3 Pancreas BRCA2, CDKN2A, STK11, TP53, PRSS1, SPINK1 BRCA1, MSH2, MLH1 rs , rs (CHRNA3, CHRNB4, CHRNA5) Source: Foulkes W; N Engl J Med; 2008;359:
24 Liquid Biopsy - a new cancer blood test 24
25 How is cancer diagnosed today? Most cancers are detected during Routine screening examination, physical examination or an investigation prompted by symptoms Imaging tests (X-rays, MRI, CT) help determine a cancer's location To confirm the diagnosis of most solid cancers, a biopsy is performed A biopsy is the removal of tissue (needle, endoscope or surgery) from a suspected tumour to study under a microscope to check for cancer cells (histopathology) Results of the histopathology, together with physical examination and imaging tests, form the basis of cancer staging and grading 25
26 Liquid Biopsy a new molecular cancer blood test to screen for acquired mutations in cancer driver genes Liquid biopsy is the term used to describe a molecular test done on a sample of blood (or other bodily fluids such as plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine) to look for tumour material circulating in the blood such as: circulating tumour cells (CTCs) cell free DNA (cfdna) exosomes Source: 26
27 Very low abundance of CTCs and cfdna in blood sample 10 ml Whole Blood 50 billion RBCs 50 million WBCs CTCs tcfdna 0-1 cfdna
28 Note! A positive liquid biopsy test does not confirm the presence of cancer! (nor does a negative liquid biopsy exclude the presence of cancer) 28
29 Conclusion 29
30 Summary Cardiovascular disease, cancer and Alzheimer s disease are the key drivers of mortality Managing health risk factors will be key to extend life expectancy Biomedical technology and behavioural changes are believed to be the major forces shaping future mortality The next generation genomics is a disruptive force to our current health management systems Genetic technology is a key enabler of personalized medicine approaches Liquid biopsy diagnostics is aiding personalized cancer therapy and gives hope to improved cancer survival rates Cancer products need to proactively upgrade their definitions to manage claims exposure due to new diagnostics such as liquid biopsy 30
31 Questions? Dr Christoph Nabholz, Head R&D Life & Health, NGIC June 2017
32 32
33 Legal notice 2017 Swiss Re. All rights reserved. You are not permitted to create any modifications or derivative works of this presentation or to use it for commercial or other public purposes without the prior written permission of Swiss Re. The information and opinions contained in the presentation are provided as at the date of the presentation and are subject to change without notice. Although the information used was taken from reliable sources, Swiss Re does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of the details given. All liability for the accuracy and completeness thereof or for any damage or loss resulting from the use of the information contained in this presentation is expressly excluded. Under no circumstances shall Swiss Re or its Group companies be liable for any financial or consequential loss relating to this presentation. 33
Genomic medicine and the insurance industry. Christoph Nabholz, CRO Assembly, 31 May 2018
Genomic medicine and the insurance industry Christoph Nabholz, CRO Assembly, 31 May 2018 The risk for disease is multi-factorial and depends on genetic and environmental components Genome Genotype Environment
More informationChallenges of diabetes
Challenges of diabetes Key findings of the Swiss Re Institute and Harvard School of Public Health studies Dr Christoph Nabholz, Head R&D Life & Health In collaboration with % deaths in China % deaths in
More informationA Closer Look at Leading Causes of Death in Guilford County
2015 GCDHHS Division of Public Health Data Brief A Closer Look at Leading Causes of Death in Guilford County Highlights Heart disease mortality rates declined 43% from 244.8 deaths per 100,000 in 1995
More informationWHAT IS A GENE? CHROMOSOME DNA PROTEIN. A gene is made up of DNA. It carries instructions to make proteins.
WHAT IS A GENE? CHROMOSOME GENE DNA A gene is made up of DNA. It carries instructions to make proteins. The proteins have specific jobs that help your body work normally. PROTEIN 1 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THERE
More informationWHAT IS A GENE? CHROMOSOME DNA PROTEIN. A gene is made up of DNA. It carries instructions to make proteins.
WHAT IS A GENE? CHROMOSOME E GEN DNA A gene is made up of DNA. It carries instructions to make proteins. The proteins have specific jobs that help your body work normally. PROTEIN 1 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THERE
More informationThe benefit of. knowing. Genetic testing for hereditary cancer. A patient support guide
The benefit of knowing Genetic testing for hereditary cancer A patient support guide Does cancer run in your family? Cancer is more common in some families. Sometimes cancer is caused by a change in a
More informationWhy Test for Hereditary Cancer in Preventive Care?
Why Test for Hereditary Cancer in Preventive Care? Millions of people are sidelined by cancer. Wouldn't it be worth it for your patients to know their risk? background HEREDITARY (5-10%) More than 1 in
More informationThe Future of Cancer. Lawrence Tsui Global Risk Products Actuary Swiss Reinsurance Company Hong Kong. Session Number: WBR8
Lawrence Tsui Global Risk Products Actuary Swiss Reinsurance Company Hong Kong Session Number: WBR8 Agenda Cancer the basics Cancer past and present Cancer the future CANCER THE BASICS Cancer the basics
More informationCentoCancer STRIVE FOR THE MOST COMPLETE INFORMATION
CentoCancer STRIVE FOR THE MOST COMPLETE INFORMATION CentoCancer our most comprehensive oncogenetics panel for hereditary mutations Hereditary pathogenic variants confer an increased risk of developing
More informationGenetic testing for hereditary cancer
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer THE GENETICS OF HEREDITARY CANCER About half of all men and one-third of all women in the US will develop cancer during their lifetimes. Approximately 5% to 10% of
More informationResearch and possible future brain health treatments
Research and possible future brain health treatments Cheryl Brandi, DNSc, ARNP, NP-C Roskamp Institute Clinic July 21, 2016 brandi, roskamp institute 1 The Roskamp Institute Not for profit biomedical research
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Mobile County, Alabama
COUNTY PROFILE: Mobile County, Alabama US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationGYNplus: A Genetic Test for Hereditary Ovarian and/or Uterine Cancer
GYNplus: A Genetic Test for Hereditary Ovarian and/or Uterine Cancer Causes of Hereditary Ovarian and Uterine Cancer uterine cancer ovarian cancer Sporadic 75-90% Sporadic 70-80% Hereditary, 5% Lynch syndrome
More informationTable of Contents / Agenda
Future Diagnostics What impact will Liquid Biopsy and other new cancer diagnostic techniques have on the sustainability of Living Benefit products? Lawrence Tsui, Global Products Actuary Table of Contents
More informationA guide to genetic testing for hereditary cancers
Cancer Testing Solutions A guide to genetic testing for hereditary cancers The benefit of knowing TM Hereditary cancer genetic testing can play a critical role in managing health Cancer touches millions
More informationMarc Moss, MD President, American Thoracic Society (202) th St, N.W. #300 Washington, DC 20036
Marc Moss, MD President, American Thoracic Society Nmoore@thoracic.org; (202) 296. 9770 1150 18 th St, N.W. #300 Washington, DC 20036 STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY SUBMITTED TO THE HOUSE LABOR,
More informationGYNplus. genetic testing for hereditary ovarian and/or uterine cancer
GYNplus genetic testing for hereditary ovarian and/or uterine cancer What Are the Causes of Hereditary Ovarian and Uterine Cancer? uterine cancer ovarian cancer sporadic 70-80% hereditary 5% Lynch syndrome
More informationCancer changing landscape in Asia
Cancer changing landscape in Asia Paul Murray EAAC 2013, Singapore Cancer Risk in Asia Current landscape across Asia 2 Cancer incidence varies across Asia 3 Cancer mortality rates varies across Asia 4
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: King County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: King County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Island County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: Island County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Kings County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Kings County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCritical illness: emerging trends Aisling Kennedy & Nisha Patel Swiss Re. 24 November 2017
Critical illness: emerging trends Aisling Kennedy & Nisha Patel Swiss Re 24 November 2017 Agenda Product evolution Claim causes Emerging trends Cancer Heart attack Stroke Estimating future trends Future
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Ontario County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Ontario County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Madison County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Madison County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: White County, Georgia
COUNTY PROFILE: White County, Georgia US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Warren County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Warren County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Washington County, Arkansas
COUNTY PROFILE: Washington County, Arkansas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lee County, Iowa
COUNTY PROFILE: Lee County, Iowa US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Livingston County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Livingston County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Greene County, Missouri
COUNTY PROFILE: Greene County, Missouri US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Richmond County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Richmond County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Jefferson County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Jefferson County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
COUNTY PROFILE: Oklahoma County, Oklahoma US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Albany County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Albany County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Monroe County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Monroe County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: White County, Arkansas
COUNTY PROFILE: White County, Arkansas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lee County, Arkansas
COUNTY PROFILE: Lee County, Arkansas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Erie County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Erie County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Bronx County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Bronx County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Converse County, Wyoming
COUNTY PROFILE: Converse County, Wyoming US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Suffolk County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Suffolk County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Rockland County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Rockland County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Seneca County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Seneca County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Kings County, California
COUNTY PROFILE: Kings County, California US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Skagit County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: Skagit County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Cortland County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Cortland County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, California
COUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, California US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Taylor County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Taylor County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Davie County, North Carolina
COUNTY PROFILE: Davie County, North Carolina US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Grant County, West Virginia
COUNTY PROFILE: Grant County, West Virginia US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationAdditional Disclosure
Additional Disclosure The Genetics of Prostate Cancer: Clinical Implications William J. Catalona, MD Collaborator with decode genetics, Inc. Non-paid consultant with no financial interest or support Northwestern
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Washington County, Rhode Island
COUNTY PROFILE: Washington County, Rhode Island US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Harris County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Harris County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Chelan County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: Chelan County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Wilson County, North Carolina
COUNTY PROFILE: Wilson County, North Carolina US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Walker County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Walker County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Clark County, Illinois
COUNTY PROFILE: Clark County, Illinois US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationBe Ready Pack Learn more about how Myriad myrisk is revolutionizing hereditary cancer testing.
Be Ready Pack Learn more about how Myriad myrisk is revolutionizing hereditary cancer testing. Hereditary cancer and you Approximately 5% to 10% of all cancers develop because a person inherited a genetic
More informationOtis Brawley, MD Chief Medical & Scientific Officer American Cancer Society
Otis Brawley, MD Chief Medical & Scientific Officer American Cancer Society Otis W. Brawley, MD, MACP, FASCO, FACE Chief Medical and Scientific Officer American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology,
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Collin County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Collin County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Union County, North Carolina
COUNTY PROFILE: Union County, North Carolina US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Allegany County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Allegany County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Charles County, Maryland
COUNTY PROFILE: Charles County, Maryland US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: New London County, Connecticut
COUNTY PROFILE: New London County, Connecticut US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Skamania County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: Skamania County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Tom Green County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Tom Green County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Thomas County, Kansas
COUNTY PROFILE: Thomas County, Kansas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Michigan
COUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Michigan US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Illinois
COUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Illinois US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Evans County, Georgia
COUNTY PROFILE: Evans County, Georgia US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Victoria County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Victoria County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Saline County, Missouri
COUNTY PROFILE: Saline County, Missouri US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Austin County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Austin County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Wright County, Minnesota
COUNTY PROFILE: Wright County, Minnesota US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Henry County, Illinois
COUNTY PROFILE: Henry County, Illinois US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Ohio
COUNTY PROFILE: Lake County, Ohio US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Kittitas County, Washington
COUNTY PROFILE: Kittitas County, Washington US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Saline County, Kansas
COUNTY PROFILE: Saline County, Kansas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Clark County, Indiana
COUNTY PROFILE: Clark County, Indiana US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Morris County, New Jersey
COUNTY PROFILE: Morris County, New Jersey US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Christian County, Illinois
COUNTY PROFILE: Christian County, Illinois US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Anderson County, Tennessee
COUNTY PROFILE: Anderson County, Tennessee US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Hamilton County, Ohio
COUNTY PROFILE: Hamilton County, Ohio US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Johnston County, North Carolina
COUNTY PROFILE: Johnston County, North Carolina US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Leon County, Florida
COUNTY PROFILE: Leon County, Florida US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Dallas County, Texas
COUNTY PROFILE: Dallas County, Texas US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Scott County, Indiana
COUNTY PROFILE: Scott County, Indiana US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Jackson County, Oregon
COUNTY PROFILE: Jackson County, Oregon US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Phillips County, Colorado
COUNTY PROFILE: Phillips County, Colorado US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Columbia County, Georgia
COUNTY PROFILE: Columbia County, Georgia US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Providence County, Rhode Island
COUNTY PROFILE: Providence County, Rhode Island US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Wilson County, Tennessee
COUNTY PROFILE: Wilson County, Tennessee US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Henry County, Georgia
COUNTY PROFILE: Henry County, Georgia US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Delta County, Michigan
COUNTY PROFILE: Delta County, Michigan US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Imperial County, California
COUNTY PROFILE: Imperial County, California US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Saint Lawrence County, New York
COUNTY PROFILE: Saint Lawrence County, New York US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Madison County, North Carolina
COUNTY PROFILE: Madison County, North Carolina US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Holmes County, Ohio
COUNTY PROFILE: Holmes County, Ohio US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or county-equivalents
More informationCOUNTY PROFILE: Clarke County, Alabama
COUNTY PROFILE: Clarke County, Alabama US COUNTY PERFORMANCE The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington analyzed the performance of all 3,142 US counties or
More information