A Nomogram Predicting Long-term Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
|
|
- Charla Watts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1254 A Nomogram Predicting Long-term Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Nazareno Suardi, MD 1,2 Christopher R. Porter, MD 3 Alwyn M. Reuther, MD 4 Jochen Walz, MD 1,5 Koichi Kodama, MD 3 Robert P. Gibbons, MD 3 Roy Correa, MD 3 Francesco Montorsi, MD 2 Markus Graefen, MD 5 Hartwig Huland, MD 5 Eric A. Klein, MD 4 Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD 1 1 Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2 Department of Urology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. 3 Department of Urology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. 4 Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5 Department of Urology, University Medical Center of Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. BACKGROUND. Men who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) are at long-term risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). In this report, the authors have described a model capable of predicting BCR up to at least 15 years after RP that can adjust predictions according to the disease-free interval. METHODS. Cox regression was used to model the probability of BCR (a prostatespecific antigen level >0.1 ng/ml and rising) in 601 men who underwent RP with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. The statistical significance of nomogram predictors was confirmed with a competing-risks regression model. The model was validated internally with 200 bootstraps and externally at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years in 2 independent cohorts of 2963 and 3178 contemporary RP patients from 2 institutions. RESULTS. The 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, and 20-year actuarial rates of BCR-free survival were 84.8%, 71.2%, 61.1%, and 58.6%, respectively. Pathologic stage, surgical margin status, pathologic Gleason sum, type of RP, and adjuvant radiotherapy represented independent predictors of BCR in both Cox and competing-risks regression models and constituted the nomogram predictor variables. In internal validation, the nomogram accuracy was 79.3%, 77.2%, 79.7%, and 80.6% at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively, after RP. In external validation, the nomogram was 77.4% accurate at 5 years in the first cohort and 77.9%, 79.4%, and 86.3% accurate at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively, in the second cohort. CONCLUSIONS. Patients who undergo RP remain at risk of BCR beyond 10 years after RP. The nomogram described in this report distinguishes itself from other tools by its ability to accurately predict the conditional probability of BCR up to at least 15 years after surgery. Cancer 2008;112: Ó 2008 American Cancer Society. The first 2 authors contributed equally to this article. Address for reprints: Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center (CHUM), 1058, rue St-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3J4; Fax: (514) ; pierre. karakiewicz@umontreal.ca Received May 29, 2007; revision received October 4, 2007; accepted October 8, KEYWORDS: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence, nomogram. Radical prostatectomy (RP) represents a treatment modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). 1 However, up to 33% of patients who undergo RP will demonstrate biochemical recurrence (BCR), 2 4 and long-term data indicate that the BCR rates may be closer to 40%. 5 7 Twenty-seven percent of BCRs occur 5 years after RP, 2,8 and the risk of BCR may not plateau until at least 15 years. 5,6,9 In addition, 17% of patients with BCR die of PCa. 10 Therefore, BCR is common: It may occur several years after RP, and it may be associated with PCa-specific mortality. Several prognostic models help to identify men at risk of BCR In 1999, Kattan et al. developed and internally validated a nomogram that predicted BCR after RP by using pathologic variables and preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ª 2008 American Cancer Society DOI /cncr Published online 19 February 2008 in Wiley InterScience (
2 Nomogram for BCR After RP/Suardi et al levels. 13 Their model demonstrated from 77% to 82% accuracy in external validation. 13 Stephenson et al. updated that nomogram to 10 years of follow-up and demonstrated from 79% to 81% accuracy in independent validation sets. 14 The limitations of the updated postoperative BCR nomogram relate to the use of the year of surgery (restricted to ) and to the need of preoperative serum PSA for predictions. Only patients who were treated between 1996 and 2004 and only patients with available preoperative serum PSA levels can be included. In the early 1990s, preoperative serum PSA levels were not available invariably. In addition, the nomogram is limited to predicting BCR up to 10 years after RP. However, BCR does occur well beyond 10 years. We decided to devise a prognostic nomogram that would predict BCR up to 20 years after RP without requiring the input of a preoperative serum PSA level. We relied on a surgical series of patients who underwent RP between 1960 and 1994 who had available PSA follow-up. 15 Moreover, because the risk of BCR decreases with disease-free interval, we adjusted the nomogram predictions according to the BCR-free interval, an adjustment that also was used by Stephenson et al. 14 Finally, we internally validated the nomogram at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years; and we externally validated the tool in a contemporary cohort at 5 years after RP to ensure its accuracy in patients who undergo RP in the new millennium. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient Population Between December 1954 and May 1994, 787 patients underwent RP at Virginia Mason Medical Center (VMMC) by 13 surgeons. No patient received neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical and pathologic data were logged into a prospective database by one of the authors (R.P.G.) from 1969 to In later years, the records were maintained electronically with institutional review board approval. Preoperative comorbidity was defined according to the Charlson comorbidity index. 16 For purposes of the current analyses, the single patient who had a weighted index of 4 was grouped with patients who had an index of 2. Of 787 men, 186 were excluded because of unavailable PSA follow-up (161 men), missing age (9 men), or missing pathology (26 men). This resulted in 601 evaluable patients who underwent RP between 1960 and Pathologic stage was assigned according to 1992 tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification. The Whittmore-Jewett classification was converted to the 1992 TNM classification for patients who were diagnosed before Two hundred ninety-seven patients (49.4%) underwent perineal RP, and 304 patients (50.6%) underwent retropubic RP. An obturator fossa lymph node dissection (PLND) at RP was performed in 308 patients (51.2%) who were selected according to individual surgeon preference and surgical approach. PLND pathologies were not recorded in the database and could not be included in the current analyses. From 1992 to 1994, tumors routinely were classified according to the Gleason grading system. 17 Before 1992, tumor grade was recorded as well differentiated (grade 1), moderately differentiated (grade 2), and poorly differentiated (grade 3) and was recoded according to Roehl et al. 4 Positive surgical margins were recorded as the presence of cancer cells against the inked resection margin. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered within 1 to 3 months after RP. PSA follow-up was performed at least quarterly for 2 years, then at least biannually for 2 years, and at least annually thereafter. Systematic PSA follow-up was introduced in 1988; thus, 253 patients who underwent surgery before 1988 did not have complete PSA follow-up according to the protocol described above. These patients were included in the analyses as long as they did not demonstrate clinical recurrence before the first available postoperative PSA measurement. BCR was defined as PSA level >0.1 ng/ml. 15 Cause of death was ascertained according to detailed chart review or was obtained from the VMMC cancer registry, which uses links with the Washington State Death Certificate Office. PCa must be the first listed cause of death on the certificate for a patient to be classified as having died from PCa. The first independent external validation cohort consisted of 2963 European patients who were treated exclusively with retropubic RP between 1992 and 2005 (Table 1). Of these, 1876 patients (63.3%) underwent RP during or after the Year None of the patients received neoadjuvant androgen-ablation therapy, and none received adjuvant radiotherapy. The second independent validation cohort consisted of 3178 patients who were treated exclusively with retropubic RP between 1998 and 2005 in an American institution. The last data follow-up was obtained on December 1, Statistical Analysis The cohort of 601 evaluable men was used to develop and internally validate the postoperative BCR nomogram. Pathologic stage, surgical margin status, RP Gleason sum, surgical procedure type (perineal RP vs retropubic RP), PLND status (performed vs not performed), Charlson comorbidity index, and adjuvant
3 1256 CANCER March 15, 2008 / Volume 112 / Number 6 TABLE 1 Descriptive Characteristics for the Nomogram Modeling Cohort and for the External Validation Cohorts of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy No. of patients (%) Variable Development cohort Validation cohort I: Hamburg Validation cohort II: Cleveland No. of patients Study period Age at radical prostatectomy. y Mean [median] 64 [64.8] 62.3 [62.9] 60.5 [60.7] Range pt stage: 1992 TNM T2a 130 (21.6) 310 (10.5) NA T2b/c 186 (30.9) 1612 (54.4) NA T3 285 (47.4) 1041 (35.1) 1103 (34.7) Positive surgical margin(s) 242 (40.3) 632 (21) 926 (29.1) RP Gleason sum (31.1) 324 (11) 97 (3.1) (33.9) 988 (33.3) 1024 (32.2) (26.8) 1591 (53.7) 1875 (59) (8.1) 60 (2) 182 (5.7) Surgical procedure Perineal RP 297 (49.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) Retropubic RP 304 (50.6) 2963 (100) 3178 (100) Lymph node dissection 308 (51.2) 1295 (43.7) 1672 (52.6) Comorbidities (91.3) NA NA 1 33 (5.5) NA NA 2 19 (3.2) NA NA Adjuvant radiotherapy 94 (15.6) 0 (0) 72 (2.3) Year of surgery , pre-psa era 253 (42.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1988, PSA era 348 (57.9) 2963 (100) 3178 (100) PSA recurrence 189 (31.4) 602 (20) 514 (16.2) PSA RFS at 5 y PSA RFS at 10 y 71.2 NA 67.7 PSA RFS at 15 y 61.1 NA 50.4 PSA RFS survival at 20 y 58 NA NA Prostate cancer-unrelated mortality 97 (16.1) NA NA Follow-up between RP and PSA recurrence or last follow-up, y Mean [median] 11.6 [11.4] 2.7 [2.1] 3.4 [2.2] Range pt indicates pathologic tumor classification; TNM, tumor, lymph node, metastasis classification system; NA, not available; RP, radical prostatectomy; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; RFS, recurrence-free survival. radiotherapy status were used as predictors in univariate and multivariate Cox regression models that addressed BCR after RP. Adjuvant radiotherapy represented the only variable that was not known at the time of RP: Because it invariably was delivered within 1 to 3 months after RP, it was not modeled as a time-dependent variable. All predictors were included in a multivariate model. Stepwise, backward variable removal was applied to the multivariate model with the intent of identifying the most accurate and the most parsimonious set of predictors. Proportional hazards assumptions were verified systematically for the final model by using the Grambsch-Therneau residual-based test. 18 Because a proportion of patients who are at risk of BCR die as a result of other causes before they develop BCR, competing-risks regression was used to test the significance of BCR predictors after accounting for other-cause mortality, as described by Fine and Gray. 19 Subsequently, the nomogram S-Plus function was used to derive the graphic representation of the Cox model, termed nomogram. To our knowledge, there are no commercially available statistical packages that allow the application of competing-risks regression within a nomogram setting. In consequence, the nomogram was based on Cox
4 Nomogram for BCR After RP/Suardi et al regression models. Because the risk of BCR decreases with increasing disease-free interval, we used the conditional survival approach 14 to provide nomogram predictions on the basis of disease recurrencefree interval. The nomogram was validated in 3 steps. Internal validation with 200 bootstrap resamples was applied to the multivariate Cox regression coefficients of the nomogram predictor variables to quantify their discriminant ability according to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Because our data were censored, we relied on Harrell et al. s modification of the AUC for censored data. 20,21 Under the condition of censoring, the AUC describes the probability that, given 2 randomly drawn patients, the patient who recurs first had a higher probability of disease recurrence. 22 The second step of the nomogram validation consisted of a comparison between the nomogram-predicted and observed probability of BCR-free survival. This was plotted by using the val.surv S-Plus function devised for censored data (see Fig. 1B). An ideal plot corresponds to a 45-degree line, in which the predicted probability parallels the observed rate of BCR-free survival. In the third step of the validation process, we applied the nomogram to 2963 patients from Hamburg, Germany and to 3178 patients from Cleveland, Ohio who underwent retropubic RP between 1992 and 2005 and between 1988 and 2005, respectively. For both external validation cohorts, the nomogram-predicted probability was compared with actual followup, and the AUC was calculated for specific time points after RP. Because of follow-up time restrictions, the validation was limited to 5 years after RP in the Hamburg cohort and to 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years after RP in the Cleveland cohort. All analyses were performed using the S-Plus Professional software package (version 1; MathSoft Inc., Seattle, Wash), and statistical significance (P) was set at.05. RESULTS The pathologic and treatment characteristics of the 601 assessable patients are listed in Table 1. The mean age at RP was 64 years (median, 64.8 years; range, years). At the time of pathologic evaluation, 285 patients (47.4%) had pathologic T3 (pt3) disease, 49 patients (8.1%) had Gleason sum 8, and 242 patients (40.3%) had positive surgical margin status. PLND was performed in 308 patients (51.2%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 94 patients (15.6%). The mean follow-up from RP to either BCR or last follow-up was 11.6 years (median, 11.4 years; range, years). BCR was recorded in 189 patients (31.4%). The median time to BCR was 32.5 years. Among the 601 patients, none developed local or distant recurrence before BCR. Finally, hormone therapy or salvage radiotherapy was never administered before documented BCR. Figure 2A illustrates BCR-free survival at 5 years (84.8%), 10 years (71.2%), 15 years (61.1%), and 20 years and (58.6%). It is noteworthy that, only after 17 years of follow-up, the slope of the Kaplan-Meier curve flattened. Figure 2B illustrates the rate of othercause mortality at 5 years (2.4%), 10 years (6.4%), 15 years (20.8%), and 20 years (33.5%). Figure 2 also illustrates the rate of BCR-free survival stratified according to the tested variables (Fig. 2C-J), in which more advanced pathologic T (pt) classification (P <.001), positive surgical margin status (P <.001), unfavorable RP Gleason sum (P <.001), retropubic RP (P 5.008), completed PLND (P 5.03), a comorbidity index 1 (P 5.009), and delivery of adjuvant radiotherapy (P 5.01) all were associated with a higher risk of BCR. Conversely, study period (pre-psa era [ ] vs PSA era [ ]) was not related to differences in the observed BCR rates (P 5.1). The univariate Cox regression analysis replicated the relations described with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and are listed in Table 2. Table 2 also provides results from the multivariate Cox regression models predicting BCR after RP. In the full multivariate model, RP Gleason sum (P <.001), pt classification (P 5.01), positive surgical margin status (P 5.007), and adjuvant radiotherapy (P 5.03) represented independent predictors of BCR. Conversely, the type of prostatectomy (retropubic vs perineal; P 5.2), PLND status (P 5 1.0), and the extent of comorbidities (P 5.3) failed to achieve independent predictor status. After stepwise, backward variable selection, only RP Gleason sum (P <.001), pt classification (P 5.01), positive surgical margin status (P 5.003), surgical procedure type (P 5.007), and adjuvant radiotherapy delivery status (P 5.03) remained in the final model. Table 3 shows the univariate and multivariate competing-risks regression models that were developed on the cohort of 601 patients. In the multivariate competing-risks regression model, all variables that were included in the model were statistically significant predictors of BCR after RP after accounting for other-cause mortality except for adjuvant radiotherapy (P 5.07). The final model (Table 2) served as the basis for the multivariate nomogram (Fig. 1A). The nomogram predictions are shown for 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, and 20-years time points. At each time point, the prediction is accompanied by a graph that allows
5 1258 CANCER March 15, 2008 / Volume 112 / Number 6 FIGURE 1. Nomogram (A), calibration plot (B), and conditional probability plots (C-F) for prediction of the individual probability of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). For the calibration plot (B), the 45-degree line represents the ideal predictions. The x-axis indicates the nomogram-predicted BCR-free probability, and the y-axis indicates the observed BCR-free proportion of patients. Nomogram instructions: Locate the patient s value for pathologic T classification (pt). Draw a line straight up to the point axis to determine how many points toward the probability of BCR the patient receives for the value of pathologic T classification. Repeat the process for each additional variable. Sum the points for each of the predictors. Locate the value corresponding to the sum on the total point axis (A). Subsequently, choose the time point of interest after RP (eg, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, or 20 years) (C-F). Within the specific time point panel, draw a line straight up from the total point s axis. Then, draw a horizontal line from a value on the y-axis that corresponds to the number of months without recurrence that elapsed between RP and the current time. Use the intersection of both lines to identify a slanted line that crosses it or passes next to it. Follow the slanted line down to the x-axis to determine the probability of remaining free of BCR at the prespecified number of years after RP. 5,10,15,20 For example, for a total of 153 risk points calculated with the nomogram (A), start locating this value on the total point axis in E. Then, draw a vertical line upward. This line intersects the x-axis, corresponding to the probability of remaining free of BCR at 15 years after RP, which ranges from 2.5% to 93%. If the calculation is made immediately after RP, then the probability of being BCR-free is 0.5 (50%). At 18 months after RP, the probability is virtually the same (50%), as indicated by the intersection of a horizontal line drawn from the 18 months without recurrence value on the y-axis. At 54 months, provided no recurrence because of RP, the horizontal line drawn from the value of 54 months on the y-axis now intersects the slanted line that originates from the 0.6 (60%) probability point on the x-axis. This means that the 15-year BCR-free probability improved from 50% to 60% based on 54 months without recurrence.
6 FIGURE 2. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (A) and other-cause mortality (B) at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years. The rate of biochemical recurrence was stratified according to pathologic stage (C), surgical margins status (D), pathologic Gleason sum (E), surgical procedure (F), presence or absence of lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy (G), comorbidity status (H), adjuvant radiotherapy (I), and year of surgery (J). 95%CI indicates 95%confidence interval; pt, pathologic tumor classification.
7 1260 CANCER March 15, 2008 / Volume 112 / Number 6 TABLE 2 Univariate and Multivariate Analyses Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Multivariate Univariate Full model Reduced model Predictor RR (95% CI) P RR (95% CI) P RR (95% CI) P Gleason sum <.001 <.001 < vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) < vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) < vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) <.001 pt classification < T2b/c vs T2a 1.6 ( ) ( ) ( ).2 T3 vs T2a 3.5 ( ) < ( ) ( ).004 Positive surgical margin 2.5 ( ) < ( ) ( ).003 Surgical procedure (retropubic vs perineal) 1.5 ( ) ( ) ( ).007 Adjuvant radiotherapy (yes vs no) 1.6 ( ) ( ) ( ).03 PLND status (yes vs no) 1.4 ( ) ( ) 1.0 Comorbidities vs ( ) ( ).2 2 vs ( ) ( ).3 RR indicates relative risk; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; pt, pathologic tumor classification; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection. TABLE 3 Univariate and Multivariate Competing Risks Regression Models for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy and Accounting for Other-cause Mortality Multivariate Univariate Full model Reduced model Predictor RR (95%CI) P RR (95%CI) P RR (95%CI) P Gleason sum 6 vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) < vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) < vs ( ) < ( ) < ( ) <.001 pt classification T2b/c vs T2a 1.5 ( ) ( ) ( ).2 T3 vs T2a 3.3 ( ) < ( ) ( ).006 Positive surgical margin 2.4 ( ) < ( ) ( ).008 Surgical procedure (retropubic vs perineal) 1.4 ( ) ( ) ( ).01 Adjuvant radiotherapy (yes vs no) 1.6 ( ) ( ) ( ).07 PLND status (yes vs no) 1.3 ( ) ( ).7 Comorbidities 1 vs ( ) ( ).3 2 vs ( ) ( ).7 RR indicates relative risk; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; pt, pathologic tumor classification; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection. adjusting the BCR-free probability for the diseasefree interval. The determination of the probability of BCR-free status is achieved in 2 steps. First, the nomogram axes are used to quantify the total number of risk points. Subsequently, the total points are applied to one of the time-specific scales (Fig. 1C-F). For example, 15-year predictions are shown on Figure 1E. When the predictions are calculated immediately after RP, a patient with 153 risk points has 50% probability of BCR-free survival at 15 years compared with 60% when the prediction is made 54 months after RP and 70% when the prediction is made 90 months after RP provided disease-free status is maintained at all time points. After 200 bootstrap resamples of the nomogram regression coefficients, the accuracy of the BCR
8 Nomogram for BCR After RP/Suardi et al predictions was 79.3%, 77.2%, 79.7%, and 80.6% at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively. When the probability of BCR calculated by the nomogram was compared with the actual outcome of patients in the first validation set at 5 years after RP, the nomogram achieved 77.4% predictive accuracy. When the probability of BCR calculated by the nomogram was compared with the actual outcome of patients in the second validation set at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years after RP, the nomogram achieved 77.9%, 79.4%, and 86.3% predictive accuracy, respectively. Figure 1B shows the calibration plot of the newly developed nomogram predicting the individual probability of BCR after RP. The 45-degree line represents ideal predictions. The x-axis indicates the nomogram-predicted BCR-free probability, and the y-axis indicates the observed BCR-free proportion. It is noteworthy that the curve depicting the relation between predicted and observed BCR-free proportions closely approximates the ideal predictions, indicating excellent calibration. DISCUSSION One in 2 men who underwent RP before 1995 have developed or will develop BCR if follow-up is adequately long. 9,15 Pound et al. indicate that, among patients with BCR, 34% will progress to metastatic disease at 15 years of follow-up. 9 Moreover, among men with BCR, 17% die of PCa if they are followed for up to 15 years. 3,10 Thus, BCR represents an important surrogate marker of progression to distant metastases and of PCa-specific mortality. Unfortunately, because of short follow-up, currently available studies may underestimate the risk of BCR. To circumvent the lack of long-term BCR data, several investigators reported middle and long-term BCR data. In the series reported by Ward et al., 27% of patients with BCR demonstrated a rising PSA level 5 years after RP. 8 The same trends were confirmed by others. 5,6,9 These data indicate that patients are at continuous and non-negligible risk of long-term BCR, and a substantial proportion will recur biochemically beyond 10 years after RP. On the basis of available data, late recurrences cannot be discounted as less important than early recurrences. 8 However, recurrences that occur 10 years after RP cannot be predicted with any currently available prognostic tool. The nomograms provided by Kattan et al. 13 and Stephenson et al. 14 are limited to 7-year and 10-year predictions, respectively. Moreover, the limited follow-up of these models may lead to the belief that BCR risk is negligible beyond 10 years. Therefore, a tool capable of predicting longterm BCR, beyond 10 or 15 years, is needed. To address this void, we decided to develop and internally validate a novel nomogram predicting the individual probability of BCR up to 20 years after RP. Our dataset consisted of 601 men who underwent either perineal RP or retropubic RP between 1960 and Because most of the men in our cohort were treated before the PSA era, preoperative serum PSA values were unavailable for a large proportion of these individuals. Therefore, we decided to omit preoperative PSA from consideration within the nomogram. The exclusion of preoperative PSA values prevented us from comparing our nomogram with the nomogram of either Kattan et al. 13 or Stephenson et al., 14 both of which require preoperative PSA values. Our data confirmed the importance of BCR beyond 10 years, because 27% of patients developed BCR 10 years after RP. At 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years after RP, the respective BCR-free survival rates were 84.8%, 71.2%, 61.1%, and 58.6%. It is noteworthy that we did not observe any difference (log-rank P 5.1) in the BCR rate according to the year of surgery when patients from the pre-psa era (before 1988) were compared with patients from the PSA era (1988 or later). Because many patients may die of other causes before BCR, we confirmed the statistical significance of nomogram predictors in competing-risks regression models. Except for adjuvant radiotherapy (P 5.07), all variables that were included in the final model maintained their independent predictor status after accounting for other-cause mortality. Because the risk of BCR decreases with time, we complemented the nomogram predictions with the ability to adjust the BCR-free probability according to the disease-free interval. After 200-bootstrap internal validation, the predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 79.3%, 77.2%, 79.7%, and 80.6% at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively. When the nomogram was applied to the first external validation cohort, 77.4% accuracy was recorded at 5 years. In the second validation cohort, the predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 77.9%, 79.4%, and 86.3% at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years after RP, respectively. External validity could not be tested at 20 years because of insufficient follow-up in either cohort. It is interesting to note that the contemporary external validation cohorts differed drastically from the original modeling set. The main differences between the modeling and the external validation datasets related to years of surgery, pathologic grade and stage, positive
9 1262 CANCER March 15, 2008 / Volume 112 / Number 6 surgical margin rate, and use of adjuvant radiotherapy. Moreover, the validation datasets exclusively relied on retropubic RPs. It also is worth noting that, in the multivariate model that was used for the nomogram, retropubic RP was associated with a higher rate of BCR (relative risk, 1.5; P 5.007) than the perineal RP. It is conceivable that the retropubic approach was reserved for higher risk patients. However, the retrospective nature of the current study precluded valid conclusions regarding the true effect of the surgical approach. Despite all the considerable differences, the nomogram achieved very adequate accuracy at 5 years of follow-up, which validated its applicability in contemporary patients. The performance of our nomogram is roughly comparable to the performance of the nomogram reported by Stephenson et al., which predicts with 79% to 81% accuracy up to 10 years after RP. 14 The advantage of our nomogram relative to that of Stephenson et al. 14 resides its the ability to predict BCR up to at least 15 years after RP instead of 10 years. The advantage of the Stephenson et al. model relies on superior sample size. 14 Therefore, the nomogram reported by Stephenson et al. 14 should remain the standard for 10-year predictions. Conversely, our model should be used when predictions are required beyond 10 years, or if predictions need to be made for men without an available preoperative PSA level, or for men who underwent RP before In consequence, both tools are complementary to one another. Several limitations apply to our model. First, the sample size of our dataset was smaller than in the competing nomograms. 13,14 Second, the Gleason grading used in the current series has not been subjected to a review. 23 However, the nomogram performed well in 2 contemporary cohorts in which contemporary criteria for Gleason grade assignment were used. It is interesting to note that the pathologic Gleason sums were not reviewed in the nomogram reported by Stephenson et al. 14 Third, preoperative serum PSA levels were not available in the great majority of patients. Therefore, this variable could not be included. Fourth, our data did not allow distinguishing between pt3a and pt3b/pt3c disease: The latter is associated with a substantially worse prognosis and may help in distinguishing between patients who fail and those who do not. Even more important, we did not have information regarding lymph node involvement, which confers an even more unfavorable prognosis than pt3b/pt3c disease and may help further in accurately predicting BCR rates. 24 Despite the omission of these important variables, our model s prognostic accuracy paralleled that of the nomogram reported by Stephenson et al. and of several other tools for predicting BCR after RP. 13,14,22,25,26 In summary, patients who undergo RP remain at risk of BCR beyond 10 years after RP. Our nomogram distinguishes itself from other tools by its ability to accurately predict BCR up to at least 15 years after surgery. We recommend its use for risk stratification in men with 10 years of follow-up. REFERENCES 1. Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2005;48: Amling CL, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Seay TM, Slezak J, Zincke H. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. J Urol. 2000;164: Porter CR, Gallina A, Kodama K, et al. Prostate cancer-specific survival in men treated with hormonal therapy after failure of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52: Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172: Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Longterm biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28: Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Barrett DM. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol. 1994;152: Simmons MN, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur Urol. 2007;51: Ward JF, Blute ML, Slezak J, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H. The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170: Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281: Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294: Moul JW, Connelly RR, Lubeck DP, et al. Predicting risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the Center for Prostate Disease Research and Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor databases. J Urol. 2001;166: Ross PL, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. A catalog of prostate cancer nomograms. J Urol. 2001;165: Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:
10 Nomogram for BCR After RP/Suardi et al Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP, et al. 25-Year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol. 2006;176: Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40: Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111: Grambsch PM, Therneau TM, Fleming TR. Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models. Biometrics. 1995;51: Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94: Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247: Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15: Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90: Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, et al. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97: Chun FK, Graefen M, Briganti A, et al. Initial biopsy outcome prediction-head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. Eur Urol. 2007;51: ; discussion Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, et al. Prostate cancer nomograms: an update. Eur Urol. 2006;50: ; discussion Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:
estimating risk of BCR and risk of aggressive recurrence after RP was assessed using the concordance index, c.
. JOURNAL COMPILATION 2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL Urological Oncology PREDICTION OF AGGRESSIVE RECURRENCE AFTER RP SCHROECK et al. BJUI BJU INTERNATIONAL Do nomograms predict aggressive recurrence after radical
More informationNIH Public Access Author Manuscript World J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2011 February ; 29(1): 11 14. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0625-4. Significance of preoperative PSA velocity in men with low
More informationconcordance indices were calculated for the entire model and subsequently for each risk group.
; 2010 Urological Oncology ACCURACY OF KATTAN NOMOGRAM KORETS ET AL. BJUI Accuracy of the Kattan nomogram across prostate cancer risk-groups Ruslan Korets, Piruz Motamedinia, Olga Yeshchina, Manisha Desai
More informationSince the beginning of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era in the. Characteristics of Insignificant Clinical T1c Prostate Tumors
2001 Characteristics of Insignificant Clinical T1c Prostate Tumors A Contemporary Analysis Patrick J. Bastian, M.D. 1 Leslie A. Mangold, B.A., M.S. 1 Jonathan I. Epstein, M.D. 2 Alan W. Partin, M.D., Ph.D.
More informationPredictive factors of late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
JJCO Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017, 47(3) 233 238 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw181 Advance Access Publication Date: 9 December 2016 Original Article Original
More informationCONTEMPORARY UPDATE OF PROSTATE CANCER STAGING NOMOGRAMS (PARTIN TABLES) FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM
RAPID COMMUNICATION CME ARTICLE CONTEMPORARY UPDATE OF PROSTATE CANCER STAGING NOMOGRAMS (PARTIN TABLES) FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM ALAN W. PARTIN, LESLIE A. MANGOLD, DANA M. LAMM, PATRICK C. WALSH, JONATHAN
More informationZonal Origin of Localized Prostate Cancer Does not Affect the Rate of Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
european urology 51 (2007) 949 955 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer Zonal Origin of Localized Prostate Cancer Does not Affect the Rate of Biochemical
More informationPreoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
JBUON 2013; 18(4): 954-960 ISSN: 1107-0625, online ISSN: 2241-6293 www.jbuon.com E-mail: editorial_office@jbuon.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Gleason score, percent of positive prostate and PSA in predicting biochemical
More informationLong-Term Risk of Clinical Progression After Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Time from Surgery to Recurrence
EUROPEAN UROLOGY 59 (2011) 893 899 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Platinum Priority Prostate Cancer Editorial by Bertrand D. Guillonneau and Karim Fizazi on
More informationPredictors of time to biochemical recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort within the PSA-era
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Predictors of time to biochemical recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort within the PSA-era Ahva Shahabi, MPH, PhD; 1* Raj Satkunasivam, MD; 2* Inderbir S. Gill, MD; 2 Gary Lieskovsky,
More informationInformation Content of Five Nomograms for Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
Anatomic Pathology / NOMOGRAMS IN PROSTATE CANCER Information Content of Five Nomograms for Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Tarek A. Bismar, MD, 1 Peter Humphrey, MD, 2 and Robin T. Vollmer, MD 3 Key Words:
More informationIntroduction. Original Article
bs_bs_banner International Journal of Urology (2015) 22, 363 367 doi: 10.1111/iju.12704 Original Article Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: Which is best for predicting outcomes after
More informationMultiinstitutional Validation of the UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment for Prediction of Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
2384 Multiinstitutional Validation of the UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment for Prediction of Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Matthew R. Cooperberg, MD, MPH 1 Stephen J. Freedland, MD
More informationProposed prognostic scoring system evaluating risk factors for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after salvage radiation therapy
Proposed prognostic scoring system evaluating risk factors for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after salvage radiation therapy Richard J. Lee, Katherine S. Tzou, Michael G. Heckman*, Corey J.
More informationJ Clin Oncol 25: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION
VOLUME 25 NUMBER 24 AUGUST 20 2007 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY O R I G I N A L R E P O R T A Nomogram Predicting 10-Year Life Expectancy in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate
More informationBest Papers. F. Fusco
Best Papers UROLOGY F. Fusco Best papers - 2015 RP/RT Oncological outcomes RP/RT IN ct3 Utilization trends RP/RT Complications Evolving role of elnd /Salvage LND This cohort reflects the current clinical
More informationA NEURAL NETWORK PREDICTS PROGRESSION FOR MEN WITH GLEASON SCORE 3 4 VERSUS 4 3 TUMORS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
ADULT UROLOGY CME ARTICLE A NEURAL NETWORK PREDICTS PROGRESSION FOR MEN WITH GLEASON SCORE 3 4 VERSUS 4 3 TUMORS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY MISOP HAN, PETER B. SNOW, JONATHAN I. EPSTEIN, THERESA Y. CHAN,
More informationOutcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer
Original Article Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer Sunai Leewansangtong, Suchai Soontrapa, Chaiyong Nualyong, Sittiporn Srinualnad, Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap and Teerapon
More informationInterval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer
DOI 10.1007/s00345-013-1125-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Interval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer D. M. Bolton A. Ta M. Bagnato
More informationDivision of Urologic Surgery and Duke Prostate Center (DPC), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
LHRH AGONISTS: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES The Evolving Definition of Advanced Prostate Cancer Judd W. Moul, MD, FACS Division of Urologic Surgery and Duke Prostate Center (DPC), Duke University School of Medicine,
More informationWhen PSA fails. Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks. Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy
When PSA fails Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy Issues Natural History Local vs Metastatic Treatment options 1 10 000 men / year in Canada 4000 RRP 15-year PSA
More informationPrognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer
BJU International (22), 89, 538 542 Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer L. EGEVAD, T. GRANFORS*, L. KARLBERG*, A. BERGH and P. STATTIN Department of Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska
More informationthree after the most recent release in These modifications were based primarily on data from clinical, not pathological, staging [1].
. 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL Urological Oncology PATHOLOGICAL T2 SUB-DIVISIONS AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PROSTATE CANCER CASO ET AL. BJUI BJU INTERNATIONAL Pathological T2 sub-divisions as a prognostic factor
More informationUse of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score for predicting systemic disease and response to radiation of biochemical recurrence
Cancer Biomarkers 17 (2016) 83 88 83 DOI 10.3233/CBM-160620 IOS Press Use of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score for predicting systemic disease and response to radiation of biochemical recurrence Michael
More informationCorrespondence should be addressed to Taha Numan Yıkılmaz;
Advances in Medicine Volume 2016, Article ID 8639041, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8639041 Research Article External Validation of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical Score
More informationPredictive Models. Michael W. Kattan, Ph.D. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute
Predictive Models Michael W. Kattan, Ph.D. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute Treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer Trade off: Substantial
More informationEUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012)
EUROPEAN UROLOGY 61 (2012) 480 487 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Platinum Priority Prostate Cancer Editorial by A. Heidenreich on pp. 488 490 of this issue
More informationPrognostic Value of Surgical Margin Status for Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy
Original Article Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Advance Access published January 17, 2008 Jpn J Clin Oncol doi:10.1093/jjco/hym135 Prognostic Value of Surgical Margin Status for Biochemical Recurrence
More informationShort ( 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
Short ( 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy Sergey Shikanov, Pablo Marchetti, Vikas Desai, Aria Razmaria, Tatjana Antic, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie*, Gregory
More informationEvaluation of prognostic factors after radical prostatectomy in pt3b prostate cancer patients in Japanese population
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015, 45(8) 780 784 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv077 Advance Access Publication Date: 15 May 2015 Original Article Original Article Evaluation of prognostic factors after
More informationTreatment Failure After Primary and Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer
307 Treatment Failure After Primary and Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer Likelihood, Patterns of Care, and Outcomes Piyush K. Agarwal, MD 1 Natalia Sadetsky, MD, MPH 2 Badrinath R. Konety, MD, MBA 2
More informationVictor H. W. Yeung, Yi Chiu, Sylvia S. Y. Yu, W. H. Au, and Steve W. H. Chan
The Scientific World Journal Volume 23, Article ID 5662, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/23/5662 Clinical Study Are Preoperative Kattan and Stephenson Nomograms Predicting Biochemical Recurrence after Radical
More informationeuropean urology 55 (2009)
european urology 55 (2009) 261 270 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Platinum Priority Prostate Cancer Editorial by George N. Thalmann on pp. 271 272 of this
More informationRADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IS ONE
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Risk of Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality Following Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Stephen J. Freedland, MD Elizabeth B. Humphreys, BS Leslie A. Mangold, MS Mario
More informationeuropean urology 52 (2007)
european urology 52 (2007) 733 745 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer Systematic Assessment of the Ability of the Number and Percentage of Positive
More informationDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara , Japan 2
Advances in Urology Volume 2012, Article ID 204215, 7 pages doi:10.1155/2012/204215 Research Article Calculated Tumor Volume Is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Who Underwent
More informationincision into an otherwise organ-confined cancer [1,5].
28 The Authors. Journal compilation 28 BJU International Original Article IMPACT ON PROGRESSION OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RP PFITZENMAIER et al. BJUI BJU INTERNATIONAL Positive surgical margins
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. Ja Hyeon Ku 1, Kyung Chul Moon 2, Sung Yong Cho 1, Cheol Kwak 1 and Hyeon Hoe Kim 1
(2011) 13, 248 253 ß 2011 AJA, SIMM & SJTU. All rights reserved 1008-682X/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/aja ORIGINAL ARTICLE Serum prostate-specific antigen value adjusted for non-cancerous prostate tissue
More informationPost Radical Prostatectomy Radiation in Intermediate and High Risk Group Prostate Cancer Patients - A Historical Series
Post Radical Prostatectomy Radiation in Intermediate and High Risk Group Prostate Cancer Patients - A Historical Series E. Z. Neulander 1, Z. Wajsman 2 1 Department of Urology, Soroka UMC, Ben Gurion University,
More informationKey words: prostatic neoplasms, risk groups, biochemical recurrence, clinical progression, prostate cancer specific mortality
JJCO Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 46(8) 762 767 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw061 Advance Access Publication Date: 20 May 2016 Original Article Original Article
More informationExternal validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer
External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer Mathieu Roumiguié, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Thomas Filleron*,
More informationCorrelation of Gleason Scores Between Needle-Core Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Patients with Prostate Cancer
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Correlation of Gleason Scores Between Needle-Core Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Patients with Prostate Cancer Teng-Fu Hsieh, Chao-Hsian Chang, Wen-Chi Chen, Chien-Lung
More informationOutcome of Prostate Cancer Patients with Initial PSA I 20 ng/ml Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
european urology 52 (2007) 1058 1066 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer Outcome of Prostate Cancer Patients with Initial PSA I 20 ng/ml Undergoing
More informationTHE MOST COMMON definitive therapy for the treatment
Postoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Michael W. Kattan, Thomas M. Wheeler, and Peter T. Scardino Purpose: Although models exist that place patients
More informationJournal of American Science 2018;14(1)
Salvage Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy: The Proper Timing and Clinical Benefits Mohamed F. Sheta 1, MD, Esam A. Abo-Zena 1, MD and Mohamed H. Radwan 2, MD 1 Department of Clinical Oncology,
More informationClinical Study Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery in T3 Prostate Cancer: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center
Advances in Urology Volume 22, Article ID 64263, 8 pages doi:.55/22/64263 Clinical Study Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery in T3 Prostate Cancer: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center D. Milonas, G. Smailyte,
More information1. INTRODUCTION. ARC Journal of Urology Volume 1, Issue 1, 2016, PP 1-7 Abstract:
ARC Journal of Urology Volume 1, Issue 1, 2016, PP 1-7 www.arcjournals.org Does the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed During Radical Prostatectomy Impact Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Isolated
More informationTable 1. Descriptive characteristics, total prostate-specific antigen, and percentage of free/total prostate-specific antigen distribution Age Groups
Oncology Population-based Analysis of Normal Total PSA and Percentage of Free/Total PSA Values: Results From Screening Cohort Umberto Capitanio, Paul Perrotte, Laurent Zini, Nazareno Suardi, Elie Antebi,
More informationProstate Cancer: Is There Standard Treatment? Who has prostate cancer? In this article:
Focus on CME at l Université de Montréal Prostate Cancer: Is There Standard Treatment? Pierre I. Karakiewicz, MD, FRCSC; Paul Perrotte, MD, FRCSC; Fred Saad, MD, FRCSC In this article: 1. Risk factors
More informationChapter 6. Long-Term Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma. Abstract
Chapter 6 Long-Term Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma Vijaya Raj Bhatt 1, Carl M Post 2, Sumit Dahal 3, Fausto R Loberiza 4 and Jue Wang 4 * 1 Department
More informationOncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up in 4803 patients
Oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up in 4803 patients Shyam Sukumar, Craig G. Rogers, Quoc Dien Trinh, Jesse Sammon, Akshay Sood, Hans Stricker, James O.
More informationGood Outcome for Patients with Few Lymph Node Metastases After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
european urology 54 (2008) 344 352 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer Good Outcome for Patients with Few Lymph Node Metastases After Radical Retropubic
More informationTumor Grade Improves the Prognostic Ability of American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage in Patients With Penile Carcinoma
Tumor Grade Improves the Prognostic Ability of American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage in Patients With Penile Carcinoma Rodolphe Thuret,* Maxine Sun,* Firas Abdollah, Lars Budaus, Giovanni Lughezzani,
More informationUnderstanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD
Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer Aditya Bagrodia, MD Aditya.bagrodia@utsouthwestern.edu 423-967-5848 Outline and objectives Prostate cancer demographics
More informationORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Impact of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Among US Veterans. having prostate cancer, assessment
ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Impact of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Among US Veterans Edward M. Uchio, MD; Mihaela Aslan, PhD; Carolyn K. Wells, MPH; Juan Calderone, MD; John Concato, MD, MS, MPH
More informationState-of-the-art: vision on the future. Urology
State-of-the-art: vision on the future Urology Francesco Montorsi MD FRCS Professor and Chairman Department of Urology San Raffaele Hospital Vita-Salute San Raffaele University Milan, Italy Disclosures
More informationUC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works
UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: Results from the Shared Equal
More informationImpact of Adjuvant Androgen-Deprivation Therapy on Disease Progression in Patients with Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
www.kjurology.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2011.52.11.741 Urological Oncology Impact of Adjuvant Androgen-Deprivation Therapy on Disease Progression in Patients with Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
More informationDistribution of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and percentage free PSA in a contemporary screening cohort with no evidence of prostate cancer
Urological Oncology CHUN et al. Distribution of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and percentage free PSA in a contemporary screening cohort with no evidence of prostate cancer Felix K.-H. Chun, Georg C.
More informationAre Prostate Carcinoma Clinical Stages T1c and T2 Similar?
Clinical Urology Are Clinical Stages T1c and T2 Similar? International Braz J Urol Vol. 32 (2): 165-171, March - April, 2006 Are Prostate Carcinoma Clinical Stages T1c and T2 Similar? Athanase Billis,
More informationRadiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy
Articles ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2004.93 Radiation Therapy After Radical Ali M. Ziada, M.D. and E. David Crawford, M.D. Division of Urology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado E-mails: aziada@mednet3.camed.eun.eg
More informationEvaluation of the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Prostate Cancer in Point of Classification of Bladder Neck Invasion
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013;43(2)184 188 doi:10.1093/jjco/hys196 Advance Access Publication 5 December 2012 Evaluation of the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Prostate Cancer in
More informationProstate-specific antigen density as a parameter for the prediction of positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy
1 di 10 26/12/2015 17.15 Urol Ann. 2015 Oct-Dec; 7(4): 433 437. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152118 PMCID: PMC4660691 Prostate-specific antigen density as a parameter for the prediction of positive lymph nodes
More informationHigh Incidence of Prostate Cancer Detected by Saturation Biopsy after Previous Negative Biopsy Series
european urology 50 (2006) 498 505 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer High Incidence of Prostate Cancer Detected by Saturation Biopsy after Previous
More informationPercentage of Gleason Pattern 4 and 5 Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy
1967 Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 and 5 Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Liang Cheng, MD 1,2 Darrell D. Davidson, MD, PhD 1 Haiqun Lin, MD, PhD 3 Michael O. Koch, MD 2 1 Department of Pathology
More informationOriginal Article. Cancer September 15,
Gleason Pattern 5 Is the Strongest Pathologic Predictor of Recurrence, Metastasis, and Prostate Cancer-Specific Death in Patients Receiving Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy William
More informationDepartment of Urology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
www.kjurology.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.5.321 Original Article - Urological Oncology http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.4111/kju.2014.55.5.321&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2014-05-16
More informationMedical Policy Manual. Topic: Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer Date of Origin: December 30, 2010
Medical Policy Manual Topic: Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer Date of Origin: December 30, 2010 Section: Laboratory Last Reviewed Date: April 2014 Policy No: 61 Effective Date: July 1, 2014 IMPORTANT
More informationCan nomograms be superior to other prediction tools?
. JOURNAL COMPILATION 2008 BJU INTERNATIONAL Urological Oncology NOMOGRAMS ARE SUPERIOR TO OTHER CURRENT PREDICTION TOOLS SHARIAT et al. BJUI BJU INTERNATIONAL Can nomograms be superior to other prediction
More informationACR Appropriateness Criteria Postradical Prostatectomy Irradiation in Prostate Cancer EVIDENCE TABLE
1. Bottke D, de Reijke TM, Bartkowiak D, Wiegel T. Salvage radiotherapy in with persisting/rising PSA after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 009;45 Suppl 1:148-157.. Valicenti RK,
More informationAccepted for publication 3 January 2005
Original Article RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN PSA DOUBLING TIME AND RECURRENCE TEWARI et al. In a multi-institutional study authors from the USA and Austria attempt to determine if there are differences in several
More informationRisk Factors for Clinical Metastasis in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Immediate Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy
RESEARCH ARTICLE Risk Factors for Clinical Metastasis in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Immediate Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Satoru Taguchi, Hiroshi Fukuhara*, Shigenori Kakutani,
More informationDo all men with pathological Gleason score 8 10 prostate cancer have poor outcomes? Results from the SEARCH database
Do all men with pathological Gleason score 8 10 prostate cancer have poor outcomes? Results from the SEARCH database Sean Fischer*, Daniel Lin, Ross M. Simon*, Lauren E. Howard, William J. Aronson **,
More informationThe prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement according to disease risk group in men treated with radical prostatectomy
(2011) 13, 828 832 ß 2011 AJA, SIMM & SJTU. All rights reserved 1008-682X/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/aja ORIGINAL ARTICLE The prognostic significance of percentage of tumour involvement according to disease
More informationOncologic Outcome and Patterns of Recurrence after Salvage Radical Prostatectomy
european urology 55 (2009) 404 411 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Prostate Cancer Oncologic Outcome and Patterns of Recurrence after Salvage Radical Prostatectomy
More informationRadical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high risk group: A single-institution experience
MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 1: 337-342, 2013 Radical prostatectomy as radical cure of prostate cancer in a high risk group: A single-institution experience NOBUKI FURUBAYASHI 1, MOTONOBU NAKAMURA 1,
More informationOncologic Outcome of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in the High-Risk Setting
END-2010-0305-ver9-Engel_1P.3d 09/17/10 2:42pm Page 1 END-2010-0305-ver9-Engel_1P Type: research-article JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY Volume 24, Number 00, XXXX 2010 ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Pp. &&& &&& DOI:
More informationAram Kim 4, Myong Kim 1, Se Un Jeong 2, Cheryn Song 1, Yong Mee Cho 2, Jae Yoon Ro 3 and Hanjong Ahn 1*
Kim et al. BMC Urology (2018) 18:7 DOI 10.1186/s12894-018-0321-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Level of invasion into fibromuscular band is an independent factor for positive surgical margin and biochemical
More informationUC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works
UC San Francisco UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wq7g6k5 Journal Cancer,
More informationjournal of medicine The new england Preoperative PSA Velocity and the Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy abstract
The new england journal of medicine established in 1812 july 8, 4 vol. 31 no. 2 Preoperative PSA Velocity and the Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy Anthony V. D Amico, M.D.,
More informationProviding Treatment Information for Prostate Cancer Patients
Providing Treatment Information for Prostate Cancer Patients For all patients with localized disease on biopsy For all patients with adverse pathology after prostatectomy See what better looks like Contact
More information2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations
2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations Harguneet Singh Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine Comparisons of Outcomes
More informationGene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of prostate cancer. Gennadi V. Glinsky, Anna B. Glinskii, Andrew J. Stephenson, Robert M.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of prostate cancer Gennadi V. Glinsky, Anna B. Glinskii, Andrew J. Stephenson, Robert M. Hoffman, William L. Gerald Table of Contents
More informationSystems Pathology in Prostate Cancer. Description
Section: Medicine Effective Date: July 15, 2015 Subject: Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer Page: 1 of 8 Last Review Status/Date: June 2015 Systems Pathology in Prostate Cancer Description Systems pathology,
More informationInsignificant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: TimeTrends and Preoperative Prediction
European Urology European Urology 43 (2003) 455 460 Insignificant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen: TimeTrends and Preoperative Prediction Herbert Augustin a,b, Peter G. Hammerer a,c,*,
More informationComparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients
Comparison of external radiation therapy vs radical prostatectomy in lymph node positive prostate cancer patients R Kuefer 1, BG Volkmer 1, M Loeffler 1, RL Shen 2, L Kempf 3, AS Merseburger 4, JE Gschwend
More informationNomograms for prostate cancer
Review Article NOMOGRAMS FOR PROSTATE CANCER STEPHENSON and KATTAN There are several papers in this section on various aspects of prostate cancer: predictive models, robotic radical prostatectomy in large
More information1. Introduction. Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba , Japan 2
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Prostate Cancer Volume 2011, Article ID 754382, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2011/754382 Clinical Study Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability
More informationCorrelations between age, Charlson score and outcome in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer
Original Article Asian Journal of Andrology (2009) 11: 131 137 2009 AJA, SIMM & SJTU All rights reserved 1008-682X/09 $ 30.00 www.nature.com/aja 131 Correlations between age, Charlson score and outcome
More informationApproximately 680,000 men are diagnosed with prostate
Prediction of Indolent Prostate Cancer: Validation and Updating of a Prognostic Nomogram E. W. Steyerberg,* M. J. Roobol, M. W. Kattan, T. H. van der Kwast, H. J. de Koning and F. H. Schröder From the
More informationCorey C Foster 1, William C Jackson 1, Benjamin C Foster 1, Skyler B Johnson 1, Felix Y Feng 1 and Daniel A Hamstra 1,2*
Foster et al. Radiation Oncology 2014, 9:245 RESEARCH Open Access Less advanced disease at initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy is associated with decreased mortality following biochemical
More informationUse of early PSA velocity to predict eventual abnormal PSA values in men at risk for prostate cancer {
Use of early PSA velocity to predict eventual abnormal PSA values in men at risk for prostate cancer { (2003) 6, 39 44 ß 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1365 7852/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/pcan
More information1259
Survival Among Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy in the Prostate Specific Antigen Era Adam S. Kibel,* Jay P. Ciezki, Eric A. Klein, Chandana
More informationBJUI. Effect of delaying surgery on radical prostatectomy outcomes: a contemporary analysis
BJUI BJU INTERNATIONAL Effect of delaying surgery on radical prostatectomy outcomes: a contemporary analysis Ruslan Korets, Catherine M. Seager, Max S. Pitman, Gregory W. Hruby, Mitchell C. Benson and
More informationInvasion of the muscular wall of the seminal vesicles by prostate cancer is generally
PROSTATE CANCER Seminal Vesicle Invasion by Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance and Therapeutic Implications Steven R. Potter, MD,* Jonathan I. Epstein, MD,* Alan W. Partin, MD, PhD* *The James Buchanan
More informationValidation of the 2015 Prostate Cancer Grade Groups for Predicting Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in a Shared Equal-Access Health System
Original Article Validation of the 2015 Prostate Cancer Grade Groups for Predicting Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in a Shared Equal-Access Health System Ariel A. Schulman, MD 1 ; Lauren E. Howard, MS 2
More informationPost Radical Prostatectomy Adjuvant Radiation in Patients with Seminal Vesicle Invasion - A Historical Series
Post Radical Prostatectomy Adjuvant Radiation in Patients with Seminal Vesicle Invasion - A Historical Series E. Z. Neulander 1, K. Rubinov 2, W. Mermershtain 2, Z. Wajsman 3 1 Department of Urology, Soroka
More informationOutcomes Following Negative Prostate Biopsy for Patients with Persistent Disease after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Clinical Urology Post-radiotherapy Prostate Biopsy for Recurrent Disease International Braz J Urol Vol. 36 (1): 44-48, January - February, 2010 doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382010000100007 Outcomes Following Negative
More informationBone Metastases in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Journal of the Egyptian Nat. Cancer Inst., Vol. 18, No. 3, September: 03-08, 006 AZZA N. TAHER, M.D.* and MAGDY H. KOTB, M.D.** The Departments of Radiation Oncology* and Nuclear Medicine**, National Cancer
More informationOncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
www.kjurology.org http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.587 Urological Oncology Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy Yi-Hsueh
More information