Dosimetric Uncertainties and Normal Tissue Tolerance. Ellen D Yorke Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York City
|
|
- Jeffry Rafe Barrett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dosimetric Uncertainties and Normal Tissue Tolerance Ellen D Yorke Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York City
2 Traditional accuracy/precision goal is to deliver external beam radiation therapy to within 5% of the dose prescribed at least with regard to factors under physics control ICRU Report 24 (2 SD), AAPM Report 13 of TG24 (2 SD), TG40, TG142 less explicit Why? There has long been evidence that larger uncertainties can lead to adverse clinical consequences
3 Evidence from deliberate trials and serious events Some early studies noted dose responses 10% dose change, 10% complication change
4 2 incidents cited by Dutreix (Radiother/Oncol 1984) 11/70 3/71, Institut Gustave Roussy: Skin and bowel normal tissue reactions noted in patients treated to whole pelvis (50 Gy/5 weeks). Traced to ~10% overdose due to linac miscalibration; 88 patients were treated in this group 1967, Institut Gustave Roussy: Trial tonsil cancer patients were treated with either photons or electrons (2.5 Gy x 18 fx in 40 days). Electrons were observed to be significantly less efficient and trial was discontinued. Electrons were found to be incorrectly calibrated (7%) Clinical trials on skin reactions in electron treatments: L and R sides of each patient served as the two arms. Reactions discriminated 10% dose differences Wambersie et al, 1974; Turesson and Notter, 1976
5 Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) NTCP=50%, Dose=D50 High complication incidence unacceptable except for minor effects; region explored by catastrophic errors Bad complications aim to keep <<1% Moderate complications accept if payoff is cure D50=Dose for 50% probability of complication γ50= NTCP (%)/ %, evaluated at D50 Similar definitions of normalized slopes γ C% at C% complication Many different functions used to represent sigmoidal response Different complications, fractionations, clinical scenarios have different dose locations, slopes (D50, γ50 ) Tolerance dose : Dose below which NTCP is clinically acceptable
6 Quick and dirty estimates For systematic dose error of p%, estimate change in probability of a complication of interest as ~ p * γ50 Normal tissue γ50 s from the literature are rather low In recent consensus (QUANTEC*) reviews, γ50 s range from ~0.9 to 4, depending on the complication 5 % systematic dose increase (e.g. a calibration error) could raise NTCP from expected to 4.5% to 20% higher A clinician may suspect a problem after patients for the higher γ50 s Design test frequency to prevent such errors from becoming systematic (TG40, TG100, Thomadsen) Modern knowledge of NTCP is consistent with earlier accuracy/precision physics goals * IJROBP 76, 2010,
7 Population variation: One reason consensus γ50 s are small A more tightly defined population may show sharper response QUANTEC, Jackson et al IJROBP 76 γ50 ~1 Distribution of binary responses NTCP Early work goes back to 80 s Goitein (1987), Thames et al (1989), others..
8 T spine Probability Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions Shultheiss et al, QUANTEC, IJROBP 76 For Grade 2 myelopathy, in the clinically acceptable region of very low complication (D<50 Gy), slopes are much lower and a 10% dose error might only raise NTCP to ~1% Myelitis is a late complication with a latency 1 yr Patients at risk often have poor survival These complications may be hard to detect clinically
9 Modern Radiation Therapy Calibration related dosimetric uncertainties tight (< ±2%, photons*) Institutional safety culture reduced errors RPC, ~1800 clinical sites Other dose based uncertainties include Dosimetric measurement uncertainties (Sc, Sp, TMR, etc) TPS calculation and commissioning uncertainties Systematic for single machine, department, TPS; may be random over population *Appendix D.5, Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics, Mayles, Nahum, Rosenwald
10 Uncertainties introduced by dose calculation algorithms and TPS peculiarities can cause problems when combining multi institutional data or adopting new dose and dose volume normal tissue constraints. Physics based uncertainties broaden the effective response curve derived from combined data*. Physics errors can skew the results *Petterson et al, Radiother and Oncol 2008
11 MUs were calculated without inhomogeneity correction Green DVHs without, Yellow DVHs with inhomogeneity correction Monte Carlo ( true ) mean lung dose 8% larger than TPC prediction Inhomog corrected ( true ) cord s D Max ~ 1.7% lower, high dose region lower than TPC prediction MC cord D Max 0.5% larger (and < high dose volume)
12 A clinic can base internally consistent, safe, effective guidelines on experience but change requires care Suppose a particular complication rate is acceptable if TPS calculated metric M (e.g. mean dose) M* TP. Suppose their dose calculation algorithm is imperfect such that delivered normal tissue metric, M* del > M* TP (lung on last slide) Suppose they get a new, accurate TPS but continue to use their old planning constraint. Now M* del = M* TPnew and. Treated dose now lower than before Safe, but may be stinting on target coverage If inequalities between M* TP and M* del are reversed (e.g. PA cord on last slide) and there is large enough difference, complication risk might increase Similar considerations hold if a clinic adopts normal tissue constraints from a publication or protocol without checking on calculation, organ definition, and delivery conditions. Mijnheer, 1987
13 Modern Radiation Therapy Treatment techniques are more demanding than those of the 2D era, making sources of uncertainty other than dose calibration and basic machine parameters more important
14 Single PA field 1 field Insensitive to setup errors Conventional fractionation Paraspinal SBRT 8 IMRT fields Sensitive to setup error SBRT/Hypofractionated Yellow= plan (no setup error) Green = 3 mm random setup error Cyan= 3 mm AP systematic Dmax=100% Dmax=111% Dmax=121%
15 Complex dose distributions also raise the question of interpretation of within 5% of the dose prescribed. For NTCP, entire dose distribution in the tissue may be important For many complications/treatment regimens, there is great uncertainty as to the most significant dose/volume combinations APPA IMRT
16 Different complications depend differently on dose distribution Volume effect (Emami et al, IJROBP 1991) Partial organ irradiation Zero dose Volume fraction=1 v Uniform Dose D Volume fraction=v TD5 (5% NTCP) vs irradiated volume fraction 70 TD5/5 (Gy) Severe RILD Radiation Pneumonitis Radiation Pericarditis Iso complication dose increases as irradiated volume fraction decreases 20 esophageal stricture radiation myelitis (reference length 20 cm) Weak vs strong volume effects % Organ Irradiated
17 Volume Dependences and Geometric Uncertainties Weak volume dependence: serial type complication (myelitis) XXXXXXXXXXXXX as bad as XXXXXXXXXXXXX Clinically limit and evaluate high dose end of dosedistribution (Dmax, D05, D1cc) Sensitive to geometric uncertainties for steep dose gradients Could be risky if planners push constraints to the limit Similar sensitivity for small organs (cochlea, optic nerves) regardless of their intrinsic volume effect
18 Volume Dependences and Geometric Uncertainties Strong volume dependence, parallel type complications (pneumonitis, xerostomia) OK Complication XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX vs XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Clinically limit and evaluate mean dose, assorted V Dose points and modeled NTCP Relatively insensitive to geometric uncertainties if organ is large relative to both the geometric uncertainty and the dose gradients in the organ.
19 Volume Dependences and Geometric Uncertainties Intermediate volume dependences (rectal complications) Clinically evaluate with V Dose points and models Regardless of volume dependence, uncertainties due to organ motion and changes affect the delivered dose and (?) complication incidence Physics efforts underway to control these Respiratory motion Breath hold, compression, respiratory gating, tracking Treatment related tissue changes Mid course imaging, adaptive planning Random internal motion (e.g. bowel filling and gas) Pre tx imaging, image based tracking or gating
20 Fractionation and time Basic Linear Quadratic (LQ) model Additional terms for repair, repopulation D= Dose (Gy) in N short, well separated fractions ; d=d/n Complication dependent biological parameter α/β α/β ~ 1 5 Gy for late complications, higher for acute Biologically Effective Dose (BED)=D (1+d/{α/β} ) For familiar magnitudes, use Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2 or NTD2); EQD2=BED/(1+2/{α/β} ) Systematic dose uncertainties affect BED through D and d Size of effect depends on α, d
21 Models attempt to summarize all these effects Popular models: Lyman model, generalized equivalent uniform dose (geud), relative seriality model geud is a non judgmental version of the Lyman model geud = Lyman Effective Dose Models combine the full DVH (or BEDVH) and other data to arrive at a single plan specific metric Other data: spatial distribution, medical variables, time Metric may be NTCP or a non judgmental surrogate ( geud) For many reasons (biological, clinical, cultural *and overall difficulty) models and dose/volume metrics have large uncertainties. Fortunately, we usually know enough to stay safe for error free treatments delivered with small physics related uncertainty. See The Lessons of QUANTEC, IJROBP 76, #3 Suppl
22 The normal tissue dose response is often expressed in measures of the organ dose distribution other than dose: geud (mean dose a special case), D Vol, BED Vol, EQD2, geud with LQ corrections, etc.
23 QUANTEC
24 Random errors In modern RT, most random errors come from daily setup variations (SD s typically < 3 mm) and organ motion; for multi fraction treatments, these blur the dose distribution; often handled by convolving the planned beam dose distribution with an appropriate Gaussian. Random errors usually have little impact on normal tissue complications Exceptions: treatments with sharp dose gradients surrounding serial responding normal structures
25 Systematic errors In addition to systematic dose output and computational uncertainties, normal tissue dose distributions are affected by systematic setup errors and systematic organ motion or physiological deformation effects Studies of systematic setup error effects often use Monte Carlo type simulations which shift isocenter for each base plan N times according to an evidence based setup error distribution (usually with mean=0, SD= ) Results are organ and treatment technique specific. H&N: Siebers et al, IJROBP 63; Lung: Schwarz et al, IJROBP 65; Rectum: Fenwick & Nahum and Fenwick Med Phys 28,
26 Simulation study of setup errors 24 patient IMRT plans Random setup error handled by fluence convolution Systematic setup error simulated by random shifts of isocenter + dose recalculation, 50 shifts/pt Cord D 2 (serial type complication) more variable than Parotid mean dose (parallel type complication)
27 From Siebers et al, simulations based on H&N IMRT plans of 24 patients
28 Clinical methods to control deformation systematic effects Treatment protocols (e.g. sim and treat with empty stomach or rectum) Adaptive replanning (e.g. mid course planning scans to assess normal organ changes due to tumor changes)
29 Hypofractionation (HFX) NTCP for hfx is even less well understood than for conventional fractionation. Unusual complications (fortunately rare) are clinically observed LQ model applicability is questioned Assuming LQ: dose response is compressed (steepened) in absolute dose but γ50 (relative dose) is not greatly changed. Bad news: Sharp gradients make HFX more susceptible to setup errors. Good news: Meticulous QA is standard of care (TG101 Most uncertainties are systematic for single or few fraction treatments
30 Dmax=100%, ideal Dmax=111%, 3mm random Dmax=121%, 3mm syst Medin et al, IJROBP 2011 Fig. 3. Dose response curve for motor neurologic deficit with 95% confidence interval
31
32 Physical uncertainties in clinical trials Petterson et al, Radiother and Oncol 2008 Physics uncertainties broaden the response curve so trials would have to be larger to discriminate an effect if there are large physics uncertainties But with 5% SD, physics uncertainties γ50 ~ 8. NTCP response curves are already much broader ( γ50 <5). There is little benefit in terms of trial arm numbers to improving routine physics precision until reasons behind shallow NTCP responses are better understood.
IMRT - the physician s eye-view. Cinzia Iotti Department of Radiation Oncology S.Maria Nuova Hospital Reggio Emilia
IMRT - the physician s eye-view Cinzia Iotti Department of Radiation Oncology S.Maria Nuova Hospital Reggio Emilia The goals of cancer therapy Local control Survival Functional status Quality of life Causes
More informationCPT code semantics 8/18/2011. SBRT Planning Case Studies. Spectrum of applications of SBRT. itreat
Spectrum of applications of SBRT EDUCATIONAL COURSE Physics and Dosimetry of SBRT Part III: Planning Case Studies Brian D. Kavanagh, MD, MPH Department of Radiation Oncology University of Colorado School
More informationAdvances in external beam radiotherapy
International Conference on Modern Radiotherapy: Advances and Challenges in Radiation Protection of Patients Advances in external beam radiotherapy New techniques, new benefits and new risks Michael Brada
More informationDosimetric Analysis of 3DCRT or IMRT with Vaginal-cuff Brachytherapy (VCB) for Gynaecological Cancer
Dosimetric Analysis of 3DCRT or IMRT with Vaginal-cuff Brachytherapy (VCB) for Gynaecological Cancer Tan Chek Wee 15 06 2016 National University Cancer Institute, Singapore Clinical Care Education Research
More informationIGRT Protocol Design and Informed Margins. Conflict of Interest. Outline 7/7/2017. DJ Vile, PhD. I have no conflict of interest to disclose
IGRT Protocol Design and Informed Margins DJ Vile, PhD Conflict of Interest I have no conflict of interest to disclose Outline Overview and definitions Quantification of motion Influences on margin selection
More informationRADIOBIOLOIGCALLY BASED TREATMENT PLANNING: THE NEXT FRONTIER. Teddy LaMaster, MS
RADIOBIOLOIGCALLY BASED TREATMENT PLANNING: THE NEXT FRONTIER Teddy LaMaster, MS RADIOBIOLOGY Radiobiology is the interaction between ionizing radiation and living things. Varies for different cells, organs,
More informationBiological Indices for IMRT Evaluation and Optimization
Biological Indices for IMRT Evaluation and Optimization Ellen D. Yorke Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Why biological indices? Dose distributions, DVHssurrogates for outcome
More informationLinac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR
Linac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR PhD, FAAPM, FACR, FASTRO Department of Radiation Oncology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, IN, USA Indra J. Das,
More informationX. Allen Li BGRT. Biologically Based Treatment Planning. Biologically based treatment planning
Biologically Based Treatment Planning X. Allen Li AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting, March 20, 2012 Limitations of dose-volume based treatment planning DV metrics are merely surrogate measures of radiation
More informationThe Physics of Oesophageal Cancer Radiotherapy
The Physics of Oesophageal Cancer Radiotherapy Dr. Philip Wai Radiotherapy Physics Royal Marsden Hospital 1 Contents Brief clinical introduction Imaging and Target definition Dose prescription & patient
More informationThe Critical Importance of High Quality in Radiation Therapy
The Critical Importance of High Quality in Radiation Therapy Stephen F. Kry, PhD ICARO-2 Vienna June, 2017 Quality in Radiation Therapy Radiation therapy is versatile and important for many patients Intuitively,
More informationBiologically Based Treatment Planning X. Allen Li
Biologically Based Treatment Planning X. Allen Li AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting, March 20, 2012 Limitations of dose-volume based treatment planning DV metrics are merely surrogate measures of radiation
More informationRadiotherapy: Accuracy and uncertainties. Ben Mijnheer
Radiotherapy: Accuracy and uncertainties Ben Mijnheer Tissue response vs absorbed dose 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Tumour control Normal tissue damage 0.0 D1 = Low cures, no complications D2 = Moderate cures,
More informationFeasibility of 4D IMRT Delivery for Hypofractionated High Dose Partial Prostate Treatments
Feasibility of 4D IMRT Delivery for Hypofractionated High Dose Partial Prostate Treatments R.A. Price Jr., Ph.D., J. Li, Ph.D., A. Pollack, M.D., Ph.D.*, L. Jin, Ph.D., E. Horwitz, M.D., M. Buyyounouski,
More informationSunCHECK Patient Comprehensive Patient QA
The SunCHECK Platform SunCHECK Patient Comprehensive Patient QA SunCHECK Patient // Comprehensive Patient QA Automate Your Patient QA SunCHECK Patient automates all your Patient QA needs from Secondary
More informationLeila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital
2 nd UK and Ireland Dosimetry Check User Meeting Symposium Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, 24 th October 2012 Leila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital Leila.Nichol@nhs.net *My experience with Dosimetry
More informationImage Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Lung
Image Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Lung Jamie Marie Harris, MS DABR Avera McKennan Radiation Oncology September 25, 2015 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy - Clinical Dose/Fractionation - Normal
More informationAssessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom
Assessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom David Followill, Ph.D. Associate Director Radiological Physics Center RPC History Lesson
More informationOptimising Radiotherapy Using NTCP Models: 17 Years in Ann Arbor
Individualizing Optimizing Optimising Radiotherapy Using NTCP Models: 17 Years in Ann Arbor Randall K. Ten Haken, Ph.D. University of Michigan Department of Radiation Oncology Ann Arbor, MI Introduction
More informationAccuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy
Departments of Oncology and Medical Biophysics Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy Introduction and Overview 6 August 2013 Jacob (Jake) Van Dyk Conformality 18 16
More information8/16/2011. (Blanco et al. IJROBP 2005) (In press, IJROBP)
Methodological issues and key results in the QUANTEC 2010 review of quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic (The QUANTEC steering committee:) Soeren Bentzen, Sandy Constine, Joe Deasy,
More informationQA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials
QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff G. Ibbott, AAPM Summer School, June 24, 2009 1 QA Infrastructure for Clinical Trials Participating Institutions
More informationSpecification of Tumor Dose. Prescription dose. Purpose
Specification of Tumor Dose George Starkschall, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Physics U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Prescription dose What do we mean by a dose prescription of 63 Gy? Isocenter dose
More informationIGRT Solution for the Living Patient and the Dynamic Treatment Problem
IGRT Solution for the Living Patient and the Dynamic Treatment Problem Lei Dong, Ph.D. Associate Professor Dept. of Radiation Physics University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas Learning
More informationAssessing the shift of radiobiological metrics in lung radiotherapy plans using 2D gamma index
Original Article Assessing the shift of radiobiological metrics in lung radiotherapy plans using 2D gamma index Abdulhamid Chaikh, Jacques Balosso,2 Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics,
More information7/10/2015. Acknowledgments. Institution-specific TG-142? AAPM:Task Group-142. Failure-Mode & Effects Analysis
Acknowledgments Thanks to Saiful Huq for an illuminating conversation about the application of TG-100 Jennifer O Daniel, Ph.D. & Fang-Fang Yin, Ph.D. Duke University Medical Center Annual AAPM Meeting,
More informationDosimetric Effects of Using Generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose (geud) in Plan Optimization
Dosimetric Effects of Using Generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose (geud) in Plan Optimization Ontida Apinorasethkul, MS, CMD AAMD Indianapolis June 14, 2017 Disclaimer This presentation is not sponsored
More informationMargins in SBRT. Mischa Hoogeman
Margins in SBRT Mischa Hoogeman MARGIN CONCEPTS Why do we use margins? Target / tumor To a-priori compensate for (unknown) deviations between the intended target position and the real target position during
More informationTreatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI)
Treatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) Tagreed AL-ALAWI Medical Physicist King Abdullah Medical City- Jeddah Aim 1. Simplify and standardize
More informationCitation Key for more information see:
Citation Key for more information see: http://open.umich.edu/wiki/citationpolicy Use + Share + Adapt { Content the copyright holder, author, or law permits you to use, share and adapt. } Public Domain
More informationRole of Belly Board Device in the Age of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Pelvic Irradiation
Role of Belly Board Device in the Age of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Pelvic Irradiation 2017 AAMD 42 nd Annual Meeting Neil C. Estabrook, MD 6 / 14 / 2017 7/5/2017 1 Conflicts of Interest None
More informationDetermination and Use of Radiobiological Response Parameters in Radiation Therapy Optimization. Panayiotis Mavroidis
Determination and Use of Radiobiological Response Parameters in Radiation Therapy Optimization Panayiotis Mavroidis Division of Medical Radiation Physics Department of Oncology-Pathology Karolinska Institutet
More informationFrom position verification and correction to adaptive RT Adaptive RT and dose accumulation
From position verification and correction to adaptive RT Adaptive RT and dose accumulation Hans de Boer Move away from Single pre-treatment scan Single treatment plan Treatment corrections by couch shifts
More informationDisclosure. Paul Medin teaches radiosurgery courses sponsored by BrainLAB Many animals (and humans) were harmed to make this presentation possible!
Disclosure The tolerance of the nervous system to SBRT: dogma, data and recommendations Paul Medin, PhD Paul Medin teaches radiosurgery courses sponsored by BrainLAB Many animals (and humans) were harmed
More informationS. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned
S. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATORS Electron beam (MeV) Photon beam (MV) PRECISION REQUIRED IN RADIOTHERAPY
More informationPredicting Normal Tissue Injury in the Modern era: An Update on QUANTEC
Predicting Normal Tissue Injury in the Modern era: An Update on QUANTEC Lawrence B. Marks, M.D. Professor and Chair University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 3D Hope Dose/volume Normal tissue outcome
More informationIMRT Planning Basics AAMD Student Webinar
IMRT Planning Basics AAMD Student Webinar March 12, 2014 Karen Chin Snyder, MS Senior Associate Physicist Department of Radiation Oncology Disclosures The presenter has received speaker honoraria from
More informationPitfalls in SBRT Treatment Planning for a Moving Target
Pitfalls in SBRT Treatment Planning for a Moving Target Cynthia F. Chuang, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology University of California-San Francisco I have no conflicts of interests to disclose In
More informationDose prescription, reporting and recording in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a digest of the ICRU Report 83
Special report Dose prescription, reporting and recording in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a digest of the ICRU Report 83 Rapid development in imaging techniques, including functional imaging,
More informationSRS/SBRT Errors and Causes
SRS/SBRT Errors and Causes Ryan Foster, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Director of Clinical Medical Physics Department of Radiation Oncology UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX Disclosures I receive research
More informationCan we deliver the dose distribution we plan in HDR-Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer?
Can we deliver the dose distribution we plan in HDR-Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer? Dimos Baltas 1,3, Natasa Milickovic 1, Nikolaos Zamboglou 2 1 Dept. of Medical Physics & Engineering, 2 Strahlenklinik,
More informationTHE TRANSITION FROM 2D TO 3D AND TO IMRT - RATIONALE AND CRITICAL ELEMENTS
THE TRANSITION FROM 2D TO 3D AND TO IMRT - RATIONALE AND CRITICAL ELEMENTS ICTP SCHOOL ON MEDICAL PHYSICS FOR RADIATION THERAPY DOSIMETRY AND TREATMENT PLANNING FOR BASIC AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS March
More informationCan we hit the target? Can we put the dose where we want it? Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Quality Assurance in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy David Shepard, Ph.D. Swedish Cancer Institute Seattle, WA Timothy D. Solberg, Ph.D. University of Texas Southwestern
More informationImplementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Implementation of radiosurgery and SBRT requires a fundamentally sound approach Errors don t blur out
More informationComparing conformal, arc radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in craniospinal irradiation planning
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 5, 2014 Comparing conformal, arc radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in craniospinal irradiation planning Pamela A. Myers, 1 Panayiotis Mavroidis,
More informationUSE OF NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY MODELS IN THE CLINIC
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754 Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., Vol. 76, No. 3, Supplement, pp. S10 S19, 2010 Copyright Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0360-3016/10/$
More informationEvaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases
Evaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases CASE STUDY Institution: Odette Cancer Centre Location: Sunnybrook
More informationTreatment Planning & IGRT Credentialing for NRG SBRT Trials
Treatment Planning & IGRT Credentialing for NRG SBRT Trials Hania Al Hallaq, Ph.D. Department of Radiation & Cellular Oncology The University of Chicago Learning Objectives Explain rationale behind credentialing
More information8/1/2016. Motion Management for Proton Lung SBRT. Outline. Protons and motion. Protons and Motion. Proton lung SBRT Future directions
Motion Management for Proton Lung SBRT AAPM 2016 Outline Protons and Motion Dosimetric effects Remedies and mitigation techniques Proton lung SBRT Future directions Protons and motion Dosimetric perturbation
More informationTransition to Heterogeneity Corrections. Why have accurate dose algorithms?
Transition to Heterogeneity Corrections Eric E. Klein, M.S., Washington University, St. Louis, MO Craig Stevens, M.D., Ph.D., MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Nikos Papinikolou, Ph.D., University
More informationWhat Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff
What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff Clinical NCI Trials CALGB 1768 Participating Institutions NCCTG ECOG COG ACOSOG SWOG QARC RPC ATC RTOG
More informationComparison of high and low energy treatment plans by evaluating the dose on the surrounding normal structures in conventional radiotherapy
Turkish Journal of Cancer Volume 37, No. 2, 2007 59 Comparison of high and low energy treatment plans by evaluating the dose on the surrounding normal structures in conventional radiotherapy MUHAMMAD BASIM
More informationCan we deliver the dose distribution we plan in HDR-Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer?
Can we deliver the dose distribution we plan in HDR-Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer? Dimos Baltas Dept. of Medical Physics & Engineering, Strahlenklinik, Klinikum Offenbach GmbH 63069 Offenbach, Germany
More informationRadiation therapy treatment plan optimization accounting for random and systematic patient setup uncertainties
Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 211 Radiation therapy treatment plan optimization accounting for random and systematic patient setup uncertainties
More informationEfficient SIB-IMRT planning of head & neck patients with Pinnacle 3 -DMPO
Investigations and research Efficient SIB-IMRT planning of head & neck patients with Pinnacle 3 -DMPO M. Kunze-Busch P. van Kollenburg Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical
More informationDosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2002 Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries
More informationIndividualising prescription dose to lung tumours based on NTCP
Agenzia Provinciale per la Protonterapia Trento Individualising prescription dose to lung tumours based on NTCP M. Schwarz schwarz@atrep.it RT for the lung: where are we? Typical radical doses < 70 Gy
More informationStereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for locally advanced pancreatic tumors
Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for locally advanced pancreatic tumors Anna Bruynzeel, Radiation Oncologist VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Current standard
More informationHampton University Proton Therapy Institute
Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute Brief introduction to proton therapy technology, its advances and Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute Vahagn Nazaryan, Ph.D. Executive Director, HUPTI
More informationStereotaxy. Outlines. Establishing SBRT Program: Physics & Dosimetry. SBRT - Simulation. Body Localizer. Sim. Sim. Sim. Stereotaxy?
Establishing SBRT Program: Physics & Dosimetry Lu Wang, Ph.D. Radiation Oncology Department Fox Chase Cancer Center Outlines Illustrate the difference between SBRT vs. CRT Introduce the major procedures
More informationIMRT pre-treatment verification basic approaches
School of Medical Physics for Radiation Therapy: Dosimetry and Treatment Planning for Basic and Advanced Applications 27-march 7-april 2017 IMRT pre-treatment verification basic approaches Eugenia Moretti
More informationIndependent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo. C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Independent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA Outline Why Monte Carlo for IMRT QA? Experimental verification
More informationOverview of MLC-based Linac Radiosurgery
SRT I: Comparison of SRT Techniques 1 Overview of MLC-based Linac Radiosurgery Grace Gwe-Ya Kim, Ph.D. DABR 2 MLC based Linac SRS Better conformity for irregular target Improved dose homogeneity inside
More informationThe Four R s. Repair Reoxygenation Repopulation Redistribution. The Radiobiology of Small Fraction Numbers. The Radiobiology of Small Fraction Numbers
The Radiobiology of Small Fraction Numbers David J. Brenner, PhD, DSc Center for Radiological Research Columbia University Medical Center djb3@columbia.edu The Radiobiology of Small Fraction Numbers 1.
More informationChanging Paradigms in Radiotherapy
Changing Paradigms in Radiotherapy Marco van Vulpen, MD, PhD Mouldroomdag-2015 Towards the elimination of invasion 1 NIH opinion on the future of oncology Twenty-five years from now,i hope that we won
More informationOverview of Advanced Techniques in Radiation Therapy
Overview of Advanced Techniques in Radiation Therapy Jacob (Jake) Van Dyk Manager, Physics & Engineering, LRCP Professor, UWO University of Western Ontario Acknowledgements Glenn Bauman Jerry Battista
More informationStrategies and Technologies for Cranial Radiosurgery Planning: Gamma Knife
Conflicts of Interest Strategies and Technologies for Cranial Radiosurgery Planning: Gamma Knife David Schlesinger, Ph.D. Research support: Elekta Instruments, AB Lars Leksell Gamma Knife Center University
More information8/2/2018. Disclosures. In ICRU91: SRT = {SBRT/SABR, SRS}
High Dose, Small Field Radiation Therapy: Lessons from the HyTEC Project and the ICRU 91 Report Part 1: Small Field Dosimetry Jan Seuntjens, Ph.D, FCCPM, FAAPM, FCOMP Director and Professor, Medical Physics
More informationIndividualized dosimetry treatment planning for liver irradiation
Individualized dosimetry treatment planning for liver irradiation A. Tai, B. Erickson, K. A. Khater,, X. A. Li Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Waukesha, Wisconsin 1 Outline Introduction Materials
More informationA Dosimetric Comparison of Whole-Lung Treatment Techniques. in the Pediatric Population
A Dosimetric Comparison of Whole-Lung Treatment Techniques in the Pediatric Population Corresponding Author: Christina L. Bosarge, B.S., R.T. (R) (T) Indiana University School of Medicine Department of
More informationSpinal Cord Doses in Palliative Lung Radiotherapy Schedules
Journal of the Egyptian Nat. Cancer Inst., Vol. 8, No., June: -, 00 Spinal Cord Doses in Palliative Lung Radiotherapy Schedules HODA AL-BOOZ, FRCR FFRRCSI M.D.* and CAROL PARTON, Ph.D.** The Departments
More informationRectal dose and toxicity dosimetric evaluation for various beam arrangements using pencil beam scanning protons with and without rectal spacers
Rectal dose and toxicity dosimetric evaluation for various beam arrangements using pencil beam scanning protons with and without rectal spacers 2015 MAC-AAPM Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD Heeteak Chung,
More informationRange Uncertainties in Proton Therapy
Range Uncertainties in Proton Therapy Harald Paganetti PhD Professor of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School Director of Physics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiation
More information8/2/2017. Improving Dose Prescriptions for Safety, Reporting, and Clinical Guideline Consistency. Part III
Improving Dose Prescriptions for Safety, Reporting, and Clinical Guideline Consistency Part III I Das, J Moran, M Langer Keeping Guidelines On Track: The Effect On Clinical Practice of Neglecting Guidelines
More informationImage Guided Proton Therapy and Treatment Adaptation
Image Guided Proton Therapy and Treatment Adaptation www.hollandptc.nl d.r.schaart@tudelft.nl Cancer in The Netherlands About 1 in 3 people get cancer in some stage of their life 86.800 new cancer patients
More informationDefining Target Volumes and Organs at Risk: a common language
Defining Target Volumes and Organs at Risk: a common language Eduardo Rosenblatt Section Head Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy (ARBR) Section Division of Human Health IAEA Objective: To introduce
More informationIn-silico study to compare proton versus photon radiotherapy: a modelization based decision protocol ProtonShare Project
In-silico study to compare proton versus photon radiotherapy: a modelization based decision protocol ProtonShare Project Abdulhamid Chaikh, Jacques Balosso Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical
More informationEvaluation of Whole-Field and Split-Field Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer
1 Charles Poole April Case Study April 30, 2012 Evaluation of Whole-Field and Split-Field Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer Abstract: Introduction: This study
More informationCardiovascular disease after radiation therapy
Cardiovascular disease after radiation therapy Giovanna Gagliardi Section of Radiotherapy Physics and Engineering Dept. of Medical Physics Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm EU Scientific Seminar
More informationThe Radiation Biology of Dose Fractionation: Determinants of Effect
The Radiation Biology of Dose Fractionation: Determinants of Effect E. Day Werts, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology West Penn Allegheny Radiation Oncology Network Allegheny General Hospital Historical
More informationThe Evolution of SBRT and Hypofractionation in Thoracic Radiation Oncology
The Evolution of SBRT and Hypofractionation in Thoracic Radiation Oncology (specifically, lung cancer) 2/10/18 Jeffrey Kittel, MD Radiation Oncology, Aurora St. Luke s Medical Center Outline The history
More informationQuestions may be submitted anytime during the presentation.
Understanding Radiation Therapy and its Role in Treating Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Presented by Pancreatic Cancer Action Network www.pancan.org August 18, 2014 If you experience technical difficulty
More informationTreatment Planning for Lung. Kristi Hendrickson, PhD, DABR University of Washington Dept. of Radiation Oncology
Treatment Planning for Lung Kristi Hendrickson, PhD, DABR University of Washington Dept. of Radiation Oncology Outline of Presentation Dosimetric planning strategies for SBRT lung Delivery techniques Examples
More informationAutomated Plan Quality Check with Scripting. Rajesh Gutti, Ph.D. Clinical Medical Physicist
Automated Plan Quality Check with Scripting Rajesh Gutti, Ph.D. Clinical Medical Physicist Veera.Gutti@BSWHealth.org Outline Introduction - BSW Automation in Treatment planning Eclipse Scripting API Script
More informationNew Thinking on Fractionation in Radiotherapy
New Thinking on Fractionation in Radiotherapy Alan E. Nahum Visiting Professor, Physics dept., Liverpool university, UK alan_e_nahum@yahoo.co.uk 1 An honorarium is provided by Accuray for this presentation
More informationIntensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies ICPT School on Medical Physics for Radiation Therapy Justus Adamson PhD Assistant Professor Department of Radiation
More information4 Essentials of CK Physics 8/2/2012. SRS using the CyberKnife. Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest
SRS using the CyberKnife Sonja Dieterich, PhD, DABR Associate Professor University of California Davis Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest Consulting agreements with Broncus Medical and CyberHeart, Inc. Scientific
More informationLimits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems
Limits of Precision and Accuracy of Radiation Delivery Systems Jean M. Moran, Ph.D. 1 and Timothy Ritter, Ph.D. 2 1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2 Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Hospital, Ann
More informationData Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials. July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff
Data Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff RPC Programs Assure... Constancy of basic machine calibration (TLD/OSLD Audits) Validity of treatment
More informationQuality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques
TROG 08.03 RAVES Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques Introduction Commissioning and quality assurance of planning systems and treatment delivery
More informationSpatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: GRID Sponsored by.decimal Friday, August 22, Pamela Myers, Ph.D.
Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: GRID Sponsored by.decimal Friday, August 22, 2014 Pamela Myers, Ph.D. Introduction o o o o o Outline GRID compensator Purpose of SFRT/GRID therapy Fractionation
More information7/31/2012. Volumetric modulated arc therapy. UAB Department of Radiation Oncology. Richard Popple, Ph.D.
UAB Department of Radiation Oncology Volumetric modulated arc therapy Richard Popple, Ph.D. Disclosures UAB has research agreements with Varian Medical Systems Speaking honoraria from Varian Medical Systems
More informationRADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident
Resident s Name: RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident Rotation: PHYS 703: Clinical Rotation 2 Inclusive dates of rotation: Feb. 26, 2016 Aug. 25, 2016 Director or Associate
More information4.1.1 Dose distributions LKB effective volume or mean liver dose? The critical volume model TUMOUR CONTROL...
1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY (SBRT)... 3 1.1.1 The development of SBRT... 3 1.1.2 The technique of SBRT... 4 1.1.3 Hypofractionation and inhomogeneous dose distribution...
More information8/3/2016. Outline. Site Specific IGRT Considerations for Clinical Imaging Protocols. Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD University of Virginia
Site Specific IGRT Considerations for Clinical Imaging Protocols Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD University of Virginia Outline Image registration accuracies for different modalities What imaging modality best
More informationThe dependence of optimal fractionation schemes on the spatial dose distribution
The dependence of optimal fractionation schemes on the spatial dose distribution Jan Unkelbach 1, David Craft 1, Ehsan Salari 1, Jagdish Ramakrishnan 1,2, Thomas Bortfeld 1 1 Department of Radiation Oncology,
More informationIMAT: intensity-modulated arc therapy
: intensity-modulated arc therapy M. Iori S. Maria Nuova Hospital, Medical Physics Department Reggio Emilia, Italy 1 Topics of the talk Rotational IMRT techniques: modalities & dedicated inverse-planning
More informationMVCT Image. Robert Staton, PhD DABR. MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando. ACMP Annual Meeting 2011
MVCT Image Guidance and QA Robert Staton, PhD DABR MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando ACMP Annual Meeting 2011 Disclosures MDACCO has received grant funding from TomoTherapy, Inc. Overview TomoTherapy MVCT
More informationNew Technologies for the Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer Meyer JL (ed): IMRT, IGRT, SBRT Advances in the Treatment Planning and Delivery of Radiotherapy. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. Basel, Karger, 27, vol. 4, pp 315 337 New Technologies for the
More informationRadiobiological Impact of Planning Techniques for Prostate Cancer in Terms of Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability
Original Article Radiobiological Impact of Planning Techniques for Prostate Cancer in Terms of Tumor Control Probability and Normal Tissue Complication Probability Rana S, Cheng CY Department of Medical
More information