Radiation-induced Bystander Effect in Immune Response 1
|
|
- Spencer Greer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 17, (2004) Radiation-induced Bystander Effect in Immune Response 1 SHU-ZHENG LIU 2, SHUN-ZI JIN, AND XIAO-DONG LIU Department of Radiation Biology, Jilin University School of Public Health, 8 Xinmin Street, Changchun , Jilin, China Objective Since most reports on bystander effect have been only concerned with radiation-induced damage, the present paper aimed at disclosing whether low dose radiation could induce a stimulatory or beneficial bystander effect. Methods A co-culture system containing irradiated antigen presenting cells (J774A.1) and unirradiated T lymphocytes (EL-4) was established to observe the effect of J774A.1 cells exposed to both low and high doses of X-rays on the unirradiated EL-4 cells. Incorporation of 3 H-TdR was used to assess the proliferation of the EL-4 cells, expression of CD80/86 and CD48 on J774A.1 cells was measured with immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, respectively. NO release from J774A.1 cells was estimated with nitrate reduction method. Results Low dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells could stimulate the proliferation of the unirradiated EL-4 cells while the high dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells exerted an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of the unirradiated EL-4 cells. Preliminary mechanistic studies illustrated that the differential changes in CD48 expression and NO production by the irradiated J774A.1 cells after high and low dose radiation might be important factors underlying the differential bystander effect elicited by different doses of radiation. Conclusion Stimulatory bystander effect can be induced in immune cells by low dose radiation. Key words: Bystander effect; Radiation; Antigen presenting cells; T lymphocytes; CD48; NO INTRODUCTION Bystander effect was first noticed with radiation-induced genetic alterations evoked by α particles traversing the cytoplasm of the cell without hitting the nucleus and observations were later extended to cellular interactions in different model systems [1-5]. It is now agreed that both high and low LET radiation can produce significant effects on cells which are not directly hit by the radiation. Several methods have been used to explore the effect including very low fluence of alpha particles, microbeam technology and simple medium transfer. Now the phenomenon is widely accepted, but very little is known about the exact mechanisms involved. Several experimental studies performed in the past decade have suggested the occurrence of low-dose-specific phenomena such as the bystander effect (viewed as damage induction in cells not directly hit by radiation) and adaptive response (induction of resistance to subsequent irradiation with higher doses). Cellular communication has been widely regarded as a key factor in the mechanism of induction of such effects. 1 This work was supported by grants from NSFC (No , No ). 2 Correspondence should be addressed to Shu-Zheng LIU. Biographical note of the first author: Shu-Zheng LIU, male, born in 1925, Professor of Radiation Biology, Chairman of Steering Committee of Key Laboratory of Radiobiolgy, Ministry of Health, PRC & Honorary Chairman of Department of Radiation Biology, Jilin University. Research field: biological effects of low level radiation /2004 CN Copyright 2004 by China CDC
2 RADIATION-INDUCED BYSTANDER EFFECT IN IMMUNE RESPONSE 41 Bystander effect and adaptive response may have a non-negligible role in modulating low dose radiation effects not only in cells, but also in tissues and organs [6]. Previous observations reported were mostly concerned with radiation-induced damage. To the knowledge of the present authors little has been documented on stimulatory or beneficial responses possibly evoked via bystander effect, especially when the immune system is concerned. Here we report the observations of interactions between antigen presenting cells (APCs) and T lymphocytes (TLCs) in a co-culture system to demonstrate a bystander effect from the irradiated APCs on the unirradiated TLCs and the differential effects with low versus higher doses. Cells MATERIALS AND METHODS J774A.1 cells (mouse macrophage cell line) and EL-4 cells (mouse T lymphocyte cell line) from ATCC were used as the APCs and TLCs, respectively. The cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco BRL) containing 10% NBS, 50 μg/ml kanamycin and 8 μg/ml tylosin. Cells were incubated at 37 under humidified air with 5% CO 2. Irradiation J774A.1 cells were irradiated with X-rays from a deep therapy apparatus (Model X.S.S.205 FZ) with 200 kv/10 ma and filters of 1 mm Cu/0.5 mm Al. Two doses were used, i.e., Gy and 2.0 Gy. The dose rate for the former was 12.5 mgy/min and that for the latter was 287 mgy/min. Co-culture of J774A.1 and EL-4 Cells The irradiated J774A.1 cells ( cells) and unirradiated EL-4 cells ( cells) were co-cultured for 12 h after 2 Gy or 24 h after Gy irradiation of the J774A.1 cells in DMEM medium at 37 under humidified air with 5% CO 2 for 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h, respectively, before separation of the EL-4 cells from the J774A.1 cells. Co-culture of unirradiated J774A.1 and EL-4 cells was set up as control. Measurement of Proliferation of EL-4 Cells The concentration of EL-4 cells separated from the J774A.1 cells was adjusted to cells/ml and 180 μl was dispensed to each well of a 96-well microplate in triplicate followed by addition of 18.5 kbq 3 H-TdR in 20 μl. The cells were collected on glass fiber filter disks with a cell harvester after incubation for 6 h. The radioactivity was measured with an LKB 1214 scintillation counter (Sweden). The results were expressed as cpm/ cells. Detection of Expression of Surface Molecules Expression of CD80 and CD86 on J774A.1 cells was assessed with immunohistochemistry as previously reported [7]. Flow cytometry with direct immunofluorescence using PE-antimouse CD48 (Pharmingin, USA) was used for detecting CD48 molecules with FACScan (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA) using FACS software in collection of cells (10 4 cells for each sample) and LYSIS software for data analysis.
3 42 LIU, JIN, AND LIU Measurement of Nitric Oxide Production by J774A.1 Cells Supernatants of irradiated J774A.1 cells were collected after incubation for 24 h and stored at -70 before estimation of NO according to reference [8]. Statistics Student t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the effect of J774A.1 cells exposed to low (0.075 Gy) versus high (2.0 Gy) doses on the unirradiated EL-4 cells after co-culture for different time intervals showed entirely different results. The APCs exposed to low dose radiation exerted a stimulatory effect on the co-cultured TLCs as shown by the increased proliferation, while the APCs exposed to a higher dose resulted in an opposite effect. Both the stimulatory and suppressive effects of the irradiated J774A.1 cells on the unirradiated EL-4 cells became significant beginning from the 3rd hour after interaction of the 2 types of cells and persisted for at least 24 h. FIG. 1. Opposite effects of irradiated J774A.1 cells exposed to low and high doses of radiation on proliferation of co-cultured EL-4 cells. Both high and low doses of X-rays exerted stimulatory effect on CD80 expression, but with different time courses. In other words, high dose caused an early significant up-regulation followed by rapid return to its original level (slightly, but not significantly, below control 24 h after irradiation, see the open circles of Fig. 2), and low dose radiation elicited an up-regulation only 24 h after irradiation (see closed circles of Fig. 2). For CD86, low dose radiation caused stimulation of its expression from 8 to 24 h, while high dose exerted its stimulatory effect only at 12 to 24 h (Fig. 3). The expression of CD48 reacted differentially to low and high doses of radiation. As shown in Fig. 4, low dose radiation caused a prompt increase in expression of this molecule followed by its decreased expression, while a sustained decrease in its expression was observed after high dose radiation remaining significantly at a level lower than at the control one at the end of the 24 h-observation period.
4 RADIATION-INDUCED BYSTANDER EFFECT IN IMMUNE RESPONSE 43 FIG. 2. Effect of irradiation with low versus high dose X-rays on CD80 expression of J774A.1 cells. FIG. 3. Effect of irradiation with low versus high dose X-rays on CD86 expression of J774A.1 cells. FIG. 4. Effect of irradiation with low versus high dose X-rays on CD48 expression on J774A.1 cells.
5 44 LIU, JIN, AND LIU As an active humoral factor produced by macrophages in response to various stress stimuli, NO production was measured in 24 h after different doses of radiation. Fig. 5 shows the dose-response curve of the amount of NO released into the supernatant of the J774A.1 cells in 24 h after in vitro irradiation. It can be seen from Fig. 5 that NO production by J774A.1 cells was significantly stimulated after 1 and 2 Gy X-rays, but in the low dose region, including Gy, its secretion was only slightly, but not significantly, increased. FIG. 5. Dose-effect relationship of NO production by J774A.1 cells in 24 h after X-irradiation. DISCUSSION It is demonstrated for the first time in the present paper that low dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells exerted a stimulatory effect on the proliferation of the co-cultured unirradiated EL-4 cells beginning from the 3rd hour of interaction and high dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells showed an opposite effect (Fig. 1). The mechanism of such a bystander effect remains to be elucidated. As important co-stimulatory molecules on APCs, CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2) interact with CD28/CTLA-4 on TLCs, determining the outcome of immune reactions. About 20%-30% of resting TLCs in mouse spleen express CD28 and only 1%-3% of them express CTLA-4 [9]. Therefore, increased expression of CD80/86 would augment the interaction between these molecules with CD28 excluding the inhibitory action of CTLA-4 with the result of enhanced TLC proliferation. Now the expression of CD80/86 was up-regulated after exposure of the J774A.1 cells to both low and high doses of radiation (Figs. 2 and 3), so the stimulatory effect of low dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells on the proliferation of unirradiated EL-4 cells and the inhibitory effect of high dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells on the proliferation of unirradiated EL-4 cells could not be explained by the changes in CD80/86 expression. CD48 on mouse APCs (CD58 for human cells) and CD2 on mouse TLCs are another pair of co-stimulatory molecules in the immunologic synapse [10]. The increased expression of CD48 on J774A.1 cells after low dose irradiation and its decreased expression after high dose irradiation (Fig. 4) might be one of the mechanisms of the differential effect in the co-culture experiment with low versus high dose-irradiated J774A.1 cells exerting stimulatory and inhibitory effects, respectively, on the proliferation of unirradiated EL-4
6 RADIATION-INDUCED BYSTANDER EFFECT IN IMMUNE RESPONSE 45 cells. There have been experiments designed to determine whether signaling pathways arising in the cell membrane might mediate the bystander effect [11]. Cells were irradiated in the presence of Filipin, an agent that disrupts lipid rafts, effectively inhibiting membrane signaling, and the induction of sister chromatid exchange and HPRT mutations by very low fluences of alpha particles (mean doses cgy) were measured. Filipin completely suppressed the induction of both genetic effects in bystander cells. These results suggested that membrane signaling might play an important role in the bystander effect of radiation. In our experiment with low LET radiation the suppressed expression of CD48 after high dose radiation might not be related to membrane disruption, since the expression of other surface molecules, such as CD80/86, was even up-regulated after a dose as high as 2 Gy. The increased and decreased interactions of CD48 of the APCs with CD2 of the TLCs after low and high doses of radiation might be one of the factors influencing the nature of the bystander effect. Another possible mechanism is the differential changes in NO production by the cultured J774A.1 cells after low versus high dose of radiation as shown by the dose-response curve after different doses of X-rays in the range of Gy (Fig. 5). We found that exposure to 1-2 Gy X-rays caused marked increase in NO production by these cells while lower doses had no significant effect. An understanding of radiation-induced bystander effects is emerging that places them in the broader context of the interaction of cells with their microenvironment [12,13]. From this perspective, radiation-induced bystander effects are part of a coordinated multicellular response in irradiated tissue with the objective of modulating cellular programs. As proposed by Barcellos-Hoff and Brooks, this is a paracrine phenomenon whereby hit cells release factors into the extracellular medium that modify the local environment of neighboring cells and influence their behaviors. Endogenous NO is the product of nitric oxide synthases, which catalyzes a five-electron oxidation of L-arginine (with the aid of NADPH and tetrahydrobiopterin) to yield L-citrulline and NO. Our previous work showed that whole-body X-irradiation of Kunming mice caused a significant increase of NO production by the peritoneal macrophages after exposure to 2 and 4 Gy, but not after exposure to doses of 1 Gy or lower and inos in the peritoneal macrophages as estimated by immunohistochemistry showed a similar doseresponse relationship [14]. However, the dose-response relationship of other humoral factors, including IL-12, IL-1β and TNFα, produced by peritoneal macrophages after whole-body X-irradiation is quite different in that exposure of both high and low doses of radiation resulted in increased secretion of these cytokines by the macrophages. Therefore, the changes in secretion of these factors following irradiation may not participate in the differential changes evoked by low versus high doses of radiation on the bystander effect of APCs on TLCs [9,15,16]. It was reported that reactive nitrogen oxides could inhibit a variety of enzymes, initiate lipid peroxidation, and directly damage DNA. Moreover, certain thiol groups on the surface of endothelial cells and/or polymorphonuclear neutrophils are thought to be required for normal leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion, and the reaction of dinitrogen trioxide with these thiol groups can form S-nitrosothiol adducts that may inhibit the adhesion process and consequently decrease leukocyte infiltration during the resolution phase of the inflammatory response. It is currently not known if such changes also affect the interaction between co-stimulatory molecules of APCs and TLCs. The full understanding of the mechanisms underlying the differential bystander effect in immune cells induced by low versus high dose radiation deserves further study.
7 46 LIU, JIN, AND LIU REFERENCES 1. Grosovsky, A. J. (1999). Radiation-induced mutation on unirradiated DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96, Hei, T. K., Wu, L. J., Liu, S. X., Vannais, D., and Waldren, C. A. (1997). Mutagenic effects of a single and an exact number of α particles in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94, Wu, L. J., Randers-Pehrson, G., Xu, A., Waldren, C. A., Geard, C. R., Yu, Z. L., and Hei, T. K. (1999). Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation with α particles induces mutation in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96, Lorimore, S. A. and Wright, E. G. (2003). Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 79, Nagar, S., Smith, L. E., and Morgan, W. F. (2003). Characterization of a novel epigenetic effect of ionizing radiation: the death-inducing effect. Cancer Res. 63, Ballarini, F. and Ottolenghi, A. (2002). Low-dose radiation action: possible implications of bystander effects and adaptive response. J. Radiol. Prot. 22(3A), A Jin, S. Z., He, S. J., and Liu, S. Z. (2001). Effect of different doses of X-rays on the expression of CD80 and CD86 of mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Radiat. Res. Radiat. Proces. 19, (In Chinese) 8. Pang, Z. J., Zhou, M., and Chen, Y. (2000). Research Methods in Free Radical Medicine. Beijing: Peoples Health Press, pp (In Chinese) 9. Liu, S. Z., Jin, S. Z., Liu, X. D., and Sun, Y. M. (2001). Role of CD28/B7 costimulation and Il-12/IL-10 interaction in the radiation-induced immune changes. B. M. C. Immunology 2, Gollob, J. A. and Ritz, J. (1996). CD2-CD58 interaction and the control of T cell interleukin-12 responsiveness: Adhesion molecules link innate and acquired immunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 795, Nagasawa, H., Cremesti, A., Kolesnick, R., Fuks, Z., and Little, J. B. (2002). Involvement of membrane signaling in the bystander effect in irradiated cells. Cancer Res. 62, Barcellos-Hoff, M. H. (1998). How do tissues respond to damage at the cellular level? The role of cytokines in irradiated tissues. Radiat. Res. 50 (Suppl.), S109-S Barcellos-Hoff, M. H. and Brooks, A. L. (2001). Extracellular signaling through the microenvironment: a hypothesis relating carcinogenesis, bystander effects, and genomic instability. Radiat. Res. 156 (5 Pt 2), Sun, Y. M. and Liu, S. Z. (2000). Effect of whole-body X-irradiation on the production of NO by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Radiol. Protec. 20, (In Chinese). 15.Sun, Y. M. and Liu, S. Z. (1998). The changes in transcription level of TNFα and IL-1β of peritoneal macrophages after whole-body X-irradiation of mice. Radiat. Protect. 18, (In Chinese) 16. Sun, Y. M. and Liu, S. Z. (2000). Changes in TNFα on peritoneal macrophages after whole-body X-irradiation of mice. Radiat. Res. Radiat. Proces. 18, (In Chinese) (Received March 21, 2003 Accepted November 12, 2003)
Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts
doi: 10.1054/ bjoc.2000.1665, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on http://www.bjcancer.com Direct evidence for a bystander effect of ionizing radiation in primary human fibroblasts OV Belyakov,
More informationThe Potential Impact of Bystander Effects on Radiation Risks in a Mars Mission
RADIATION RESEARCH 156, 612 617 (2001) 0033-7587/01 $5.00 2001 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. The Potential Impact of Bystander Effects on Radiation Risks
More informationGenomic Instability Induced by Ionizing Radiation
Genomic Instability Induced by Ionizing Radiation Christian Streffer Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122 Essen, Germany INTRODUCTION In contrast to general assumptions it has frequently been shown that DNA
More informationEffective Suppression of Bystander Effects by DMSO Treatment of Irradiated CHO Cells
J. Radiat. Res., 48, 327 333 (2007) Regular Paper Effective Suppression of Bystander Effects by DMSO Treatment of Irradiated CHO Cells Genro KASHINO 1 *, Kevin M PRISE 2,3, Keiji SUZUKI 4, Naoki MATSUDA
More informationAdvances in Radiobiological Studies Using a Microbeam
J. Radiat. Res., 50: Suppl., A7-A12 (2009) Advances in Radiobiological Studies Using a Microbeam Tom K. HEI 1,2,3 *, Leslie K. BALLAS 2, David J. BRENNER 1,3 and Charles R. GEARD 1 Microbeam/3D human tissues/arabidopsis/bystander
More informationnuclear science and technology
EUROPEAN COMMISSION nuclear science and technology The role of intercellular communication and DNA double-strand breaks in the induction of bystander effects (INTERSTANDER) Contract N o FIGH-CT2002-00218
More informationEffector T Cells and
1 Effector T Cells and Cytokines Andrew Lichtman, MD PhD Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School 2 Lecture outline Cytokines Subsets of CD4+ T cells: definitions, functions, development New
More informationDetermination of Radon Concentration in Some Types of Cigarettes
Determination of Radon Concentration in Some Types of Cigarettes Tarfa.H.Alsheddi 1, Amal Mohamed 2 and Shaffa.Al.Mansour 3 1 Department of physics, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. 2 Department of
More informationRadiation-induced induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects: implications for radiation leukaemogenesis
Radiation-induced induced Genomic Instability and Bystander Effects: implications for radiation leukaemogenesis University of Dundee Medical School Eric G Wright Professor of Experimental Haematology The
More informationA Commentary on: A History of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Low Dose Radiation Research Program: Dr. Antone L.
A Commentary on: A History of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Low Dose Radiation Research Program: 1998 2008 Dr. Antone L. Brooks 1 1. Retired, Washington State University 1 6802 West 13 th
More informationThe Impact of Bystander Effects and Adaptive Responses in the Health Risks of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation
The Impact of Bystander Effects and Adaptive Responses in the Health Risks of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation Edouard Azzam New Jersey Medical School Newark, USA Two phenomena have been recently implicated
More informationThe Bystander Effect in Radiation Oncogenesis: II. A Quantitative Model
RADIATIO RESEARCH 155, 402 408 (2001) 0033-7587/01 $5.00 2001 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. The Bystander Effect in Radiation Oncogenesis: II. A Quantitative
More informationU.S. Low Dose Radiation Research Program
U.S. Low Dose Radiation Research Program Update November 2010 ISCORS NF Metting, ScD, Program Manager Office of Science Office of Biological and Environmental Research The Department of Energy Office of
More informationScott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION
Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 scott.abrams@roswellpark.org Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION CHAPTER 11 T-Cell Activation, Differentiation, and Memory Copyright 2013 by W. H. Freeman and
More informationThe bystander effect: is reactive oxygen species the driver?
NUKLEONIKA 2003;48(3):113 120 REVIEW PAPER The bystander effect: is reactive oxygen species the driver? Irena Szumiel Abstract The paper reviews selected examples of the bystander effect, such as clonogenic
More informationHematopoiesis. Hematopoiesis. Hematopoiesis
Chapter. Cells and Organs of the Immune System Hematopoiesis Hematopoiesis- formation and development of WBC and RBC bone marrow. Hematopoietic stem cell- give rise to any blood cells (constant number,
More informationTolerance 2. Regulatory T cells; why tolerance fails. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS
1 Tolerance 2. Regulatory T cells; why tolerance fails Abul K. Abbas UCSF FOCiS 2 Lecture outline Regulatory T cells: functions and clinical relevance Pathogenesis of autoimmunity: why selftolerance fails
More informationRadiation-induced Bystander and Adaptive Responses in Cell and Tissue Models. Kevin M. Prise, Melvyn Folkard and Barry D. Michael
Radiation-induced Bystander and Adaptive Responses in Cell and Tissue Models Kevin M. Prise, Melvyn Folkard and Barry D. Michael Gray Cancer Institute, PO Box 100, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, HA6
More informationEvidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells
Mutation Research 556 (2004) 209 215 Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells Genro Kashino a,b,1, Kevin M. Prise a,, Giuseppe Schettino
More informationRadiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures? Carmel Mothersill and Colin Seymour
Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures? Carmel Mothersill and Colin Seymour Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences Unit, McMaster University,
More informationRADIATION-INDUCED BYSTANDER EFFECTS: EVIDENCE FOR AN ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO LOW DOSE EXPOSURES?
Dose-Response: An International Journal Volume 4 Issue 4 Article 5 12-2006 RADIATION-INDUCED BYSTANDER EFFECTS: EVIDENCE FOR AN ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO LOW DOSE EXPOSURES? Carmel Mothersill McMaster University,
More informationChronic cell death may play a crucial role in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis due to radon exposure
Chronic cell death may play a crucial role in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis due to radon exposure Balázs G. Madas, Imre Balásházy MTA Centre for Energy Research,, Hungary balazs.madas@energia.mta.hu Low
More informationIntracellular MHC class II molecules promote TLR-triggered innate. immune responses by maintaining Btk activation
Intracellular MHC class II molecules promote TLR-triggered innate immune responses by maintaining Btk activation Xingguang Liu, Zhenzhen Zhan, Dong Li, Li Xu, Feng Ma, Peng Zhang, Hangping Yao and Xuetao
More informationAdvances in Cancer Immunotherapy
Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy Immunology 101 for the Non-Immunologist Arnold H. Zea, PhD azea@lsuhsc.edu Disclosures No relevant financial relationships to disclose This presentation does not contain
More informationMajor Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and T Cell Receptors
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) and T Cell Receptors Historical Background Genes in the MHC were first identified as being important genes in rejection of transplanted tissues Genes within the MHC
More informationCo-operative Radio-Immune-Stimulating Cancer Therapy by Bertil R.R. Persson PhD, MDh.c Professor emeritus of medical radiation physics at Lund
Co-operative Radio-Immune-Stimulating Cancer Therapy by Bertil R.R. Persson PhD, MDh.c Professor emeritus of medical radiation physics at Lund University, 221 85 LUND Sweden. E-mail: bertil_r.persson@med.lu.se
More informationInnate Immunity II. Integration. Lindsay Nicholson Advanced Immunology L2
Innate Immunity II Integration Lindsay Nicholson Advanced Immunology L2 l.nicholson@bristol.ac.uk Lecture 1 Defining Innate Immunity Recognition and effector mechanisms (I) Lecture 2 Recognition and effector
More informationDeterminants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance. Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco
Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco EIP Symposium Feb 2016 Why do some people respond to therapeutic proteins?
More informationMedical Virology Immunology. Dr. Sameer Naji, MB, BCh, PhD (UK) Head of Basic Medical Sciences Dept. Faculty of Medicine The Hashemite University
Medical Virology Immunology Dr. Sameer Naji, MB, BCh, PhD (UK) Head of Basic Medical Sciences Dept. Faculty of Medicine The Hashemite University Human blood cells Phases of immune responses Microbe Naïve
More informationTumor Microenvironment and Immune Suppression
Tumor Microenvironment and Immune Suppression Hassane M. Zarour,, MD Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
More informationThe Adaptive Immune Responses
The Adaptive Immune Responses The two arms of the immune responses are; 1) the cell mediated, and 2) the humoral responses. In this chapter we will discuss the two responses in detail and we will start
More informationLecture 4. T lymphocytes
Lecture 4 T lymphocytes Objectives Mention the types of T cells List the Types of T helper cell (CD4+) Discuss the Activation of T cells Define Interleukins Distinguish the Super Ag from ordinary Ag Show
More informationTherapeutic effect of baicalin on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. is mediated by SOCS3 regulatory pathway
Therapeutic effect of baicalin on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis is mediated by SOCS3 regulatory pathway Yuan Zhang 1,2, Xing Li 1,2, Bogoljub Ciric 1, Cun-gen Ma 3, Bruno Gran 4, Abdolmohamad
More informationAmniotic fluid stem cells provide considerable advantages in epidermal. regeneration: B7H4 creates a moderate inflammation
Amniotic fluid stem cells provide considerable advantages in epidermal regeneration: B7H4 creates a moderate inflammation microenvironment to promote wound repair Qing Sun 1, +, Fang Li 1, +, Hong Li 2,
More informationT-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:
Interactions between innate immunity & adaptive immunity What happens to T cells after they leave the thymus? Naïve T cells exit the thymus and enter the bloodstream. If they remain in the bloodstream,
More informationT-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:
Interactions between innate immunity & adaptive immunity What happens to T cells after they leave the thymus? Naïve T cells exit the thymus and enter the bloodstream. If they remain in the bloodstream,
More informationACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS. Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT
ACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT Types of Adaptive Immunity Types of T Cell-mediated Immune Reactions CTLs = cytotoxic T lymphocytes
More informationCellular Immune response. Jianzhong Chen, Ph.D Institute of immunology, ZJU
Cellular Immune response Jianzhong Chen, Ph.D Institute of immunology, ZJU Concept of adaptive immune response T cell-mediated adaptive immune response I. Concept of immune response A collective and coordinated
More informationVariability: The common factor linking low dose-induced genomic instability, adaptation and bystander effects
Mutation Research 616 (2007) 196 200 Variability: The common factor linking low dose-induced genomic instability, adaptation and bystander effects Jeffrey L. Schwartz Department of Radiation Oncology,
More informationMACROPHAGE "MONOCYTES" SURFACE RECEPTORS
LECTURE: 13 Title: MACROPHAGE "MONOCYTES" SURFACE RECEPTORS LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The student should be able to: Describe the blood monocytes (size, and shape of nucleus). Enumerate some of the monocytes
More informationBlocking antibodies and peptides. Rat anti-mouse PD-1 (29F.1A12, rat IgG2a, k), PD-
Supplementary Methods Blocking antibodies and peptides. Rat anti-mouse PD-1 (29F.1A12, rat IgG2a, k), PD- L1 (10F.9G2, rat IgG2b, k), and PD-L2 (3.2, mouse IgG1) have been described (24). Anti-CTLA-4 (clone
More informationLecture 9: T-cell Mediated Immunity
Lecture 9: T-cell Mediated Immunity Questions to Consider How do T cells know where to go? Questions to Consider How do T cells know where to go? How does antigen get targeted to a T cell expressing the
More informationMCB 4211 Basic Immunology 2nd Exam; 10/26/17 Peoplesoft #:
For this first section, circle the letter that precedes the best answer for each of the following multiple-choice questions. LOOK AT ALL ALTERNATIVES BEFORE CHOOSING YOUR ANSWER. 1. The TcR (T cell receptor)
More informationExamples of questions for Cellular Immunology/Cellular Biology and Immunology
Examples of questions for Cellular Immunology/Cellular Biology and Immunology Each student gets a set of 6 questions, so that each set contains different types of questions and that the set of questions
More informationOptimizing Intracellular Flow Cytometry:
Optimizing Intracellular Flow Cytometry: Simultaneous Detection of Cytokines and Transcription Factors Presented by Jurg Rohrer, PhD, BD Biosciences 23-10780-00 Outline Introduction Cytokines Transcription
More informationRadiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published December 13, 2006
Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published December 13, 2006 Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2006), 1 of 7 doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl433 A MODEL FOR THE INDUCTION OF CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS THROUGH
More informationJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Biomaterials Science. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 Supplementary Data Systemic Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 with PEG-PLGA Nanoparticles for
More informationOptimizing Intracellular Flow Cytometry:
Optimizing Intracellular Flow Cytometry: Simultaneous Detection of Cytokines and Transcription Factors An encore presentation by Jurg Rohrer, PhD, BD Biosciences 10.26.10 Outline Introduction Cytokines
More informationFOR OPTIMAL GUT HEALTH KEMIN.COM/GUTHEALTH
FOR OPTIMAL GUT HEALTH KEMIN.COM/GUTHEALTH ALETA A SOURCE OF 1,3-BETA GLUCANS Aleta is highly bioavailable, offering a concentration greater than 5% of 1,3-beta glucans. Aleta provides a consistent response
More informationLecture outline. Immunological tolerance and immune regulation. Central and peripheral tolerance. Inhibitory receptors of T cells. Regulatory T cells
1 Immunological tolerance and immune regulation Abul K. Abbas UCSF 2 Lecture outline Central and peripheral tolerance Inhibitory receptors of T cells Regulatory T cells 1 The immunological equilibrium:
More informationCHAPTER I INTRODUCTION. for both infectious diseases and malignancies. Immunity is known as the innate
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background of Study The immune system s function is to provide defense of the human body for both infectious diseases and malignancies. Immunity is known as the innate immunity
More informationSupplemental Figure 1. Signature gene expression in in vitro differentiated Th0, Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cells. (A) Naïve CD4 + T cells were cultured
Supplemental Figure 1. Signature gene expression in in vitro differentiated Th0, Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cells. (A) Naïve CD4 + T cells were cultured under Th0, Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg conditions. mrna
More informationCANCER IMMUNOPATHOLOGY. Eryati Darwin Faculty of Medicine Andalas University
CANCER IMMUNOPATHOLOGY Eryati Darwin Faculty of Medicine Andalas University Padang 18 Mei 2013 INTRODUCTION Tumor: cells that continue to replicate, fail to differentiate into specialized cells, and become
More informationHLA and antigen presentation. Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol
HLA and antigen presentation Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol MHC in adaptive immunity Characteristics Specificity Innate For structures shared
More informationAntigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS
1 Antigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation Abul K. Abbas UCSF FOCiS 2 Lecture outline Dendritic cells and antigen presentation The role of the MHC T cell activation Costimulation, the B7:CD28 family
More informationCell Signaling (part 1)
15 Cell Signaling (part 1) Introduction Bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes respond to environmental signals and to signaling molecules secreted by other cells for mating and other communication. In multicellular
More informationChapter 7 Conclusions
VII-1 Chapter 7 Conclusions VII-2 The development of cell-based therapies ranging from well-established practices such as bone marrow transplant to next-generation strategies such as adoptive T-cell therapy
More informationAcquisition of Radiation Resistant Ability in Non- Irradiated Cells by Secreted Factors from Low Dose Irradiated Cells
Nagoya University Acquisition of Radiation Resistant Ability in Non- Irradiated Cells by Secreted Factors from Low Dose Irradiated Cells Jun Kumagai a *, Akane Oohashi b and Genro Kashino c a Institute
More informationMaría José Mesa López
María José Mesa López q Radiobiology. q Ionizing Radiations. q Mutations. q Stochastic Effects Vs Deterministic Effects. q Cellular Radiosensitivity. q Bibliography. Science which combines the basic principles
More informationImmunological alterations in mice irradiated with low doses
Immunological alterations in mice irradiated with low doses "Frédéric Joliot-Curie" National Research Institute for Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Budapest, Hungary The structure of the immune system INNATE
More information1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity
Chapter 17A: Adaptive Immunity Part I 1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity 2. T and B Cell Production 3. Antigens & Antigen Presentation 4. Helper T cells 1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity The Nature of Adaptive
More informationCell isolation. Spleen and lymph nodes (axillary, inguinal) were removed from mice
Supplementary Methods: Cell isolation. Spleen and lymph nodes (axillary, inguinal) were removed from mice and gently meshed in DMEM containing 10% FBS to prepare for single cell suspensions. CD4 + CD25
More informationInnate Immunity. Connection Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Know Differences and Provide Examples Chapter 3. Antimicrobial peptide psoriasin
Know Differences and Provide Examples Chapter * Innate Immunity * kin and Epithelial Barriers * Antimicrobial peptide psoriasin -Activity against Gram (-) E. coli Connection Between Innate and Adaptive
More informationAdaptive Immune System
Short Course on Immunology Adaptive Immune System Bhargavi Duvvuri Ph.D IIIrd Year (Immunology) bhargavi@yorku.ca Supervisor Dr.Gillian E Wu Professor, School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences York University,
More informationChapter 2 (pages 22 33): Cells and Tissues of the Immune System. Prepared by Kristen Dazy, MD, Scripps Clinic Medical Group
Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Cellular and Molecular Immunology, 8th Edition By Abul K. Abbas, MBBS; Andrew H. H. Lichtman, MD, PhD; and Shiv Pillai, MBBS, PhD. Chapter 2 (pages 22 33): Cells and
More informationOverview of the immune system
Overview of the immune system Immune system Innate (nonspecific) 1 st line of defense Adaptive (specific) 2 nd line of defense Cellular components Humoral components Cellular components Humoral components
More informationEarly Repair Processes in Marrow Cells Irradiated and Proliferating in Vivo1
RADIATION RESEARCH 18, 96-105 (1963) Early Repair Processes in Marrow Cells Irradiated and Proliferating in Vivo1 J. E. TILL AND E. A. McCULLOCH Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto,
More informationEffector mechanisms of cell-mediated immunity: Properties of effector, memory and regulatory T cells
ICI Basic Immunology course Effector mechanisms of cell-mediated immunity: Properties of effector, memory and regulatory T cells Abul K. Abbas, MD UCSF Stages in the development of T cell responses: induction
More informationAutoimmune Diseases. Betsy Kirchner CNP The Cleveland Clinic
Autoimmune Diseases Betsy Kirchner CNP The Cleveland Clinic Disclosures (financial) No relevant disclosures Learning Objectives Explain the pathophysiology of autoimmune disease Discuss safe administration
More informationsequences of a styx mutant reveals a T to A transversion in the donor splice site of intron 5
sfigure 1 Styx mutant mice recapitulate the phenotype of SHIP -/- mice. (A) Analysis of the genomic sequences of a styx mutant reveals a T to A transversion in the donor splice site of intron 5 (GTAAC
More informationPaper EXTRAPOLATING RADIATION-INDUCED CANCER RISKS FROM LOW DOSES TO VERY LOW DOSES
Paper EXTRAPOLATING RADIATION-INDUCED CANCER RISKS FROM LOW DOSES TO VERY LOW DOSES David J. Brenner* Abstract There is strong evidence that ionizing radiation increases cancer risks at high doses (e.g.,
More informationImmune response. This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it.
Immune response This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it. It s highly recommended to watch Dr Najeeb s lecture that s titled T Helper cells and
More informationwell for 2 h at rt. Each dot represents an individual mouse and bar is the mean ±
Supplementary data: Control DC Blimp-1 ko DC 8 6 4 2-2 IL-1β p=.5 medium 8 6 4 2 IL-2 Medium p=.16 8 6 4 2 IL-6 medium p=.3 5 4 3 2 1-1 medium IL-1 n.s. 25 2 15 1 5 IL-12(p7) p=.15 5 IFNγ p=.65 4 3 2 1
More informationComet Assay to Assess the Non-target Effect of Neutronradiation in Human Peripheral Blood
J. RADIAT. RES., 42, 157 163 (2001) Comet Assay to Assess the Non-target Effect of Neutronradiation in Human Peripheral Blood NATARAJAN GAJENDIRAN 1,2 * KIMIO TANAKA 3 and NANAO KAMADA 1 1 Department of
More informationEffects of the angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonist telmisartan on endothelial activation induced by advanced glycation endproducts
Effects of the angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonist telmisartan on endothelial activation induced by advanced glycation endproducts Serena Del Turco, Teresa Navarra, Giuseppina Basta, Raffaele De
More informationECM1 controls T H 2 cell egress from lymph nodes through re-expression of S1P 1
ZH, Li et al, page 1 ECM1 controls T H 2 cell egress from lymph nodes through re-expression of S1P 1 Zhenhu Li 1,4,Yuan Zhang 1,4, Zhiduo Liu 1, Xiaodong Wu 1, Yuhan Zheng 1, Zhiyun Tao 1, Kairui Mao 1,
More informationMechanisms for the Biological Effectiveness of High-LET Radiations
J. RADIAT. RES., 40: SUPPL., 1 13 (1999) Mechanisms for the Biological Effectiveness of High-LET Radiations DUDLEY T. GOODHEAD* Radiation and Genome Stability Unit, Medical Research Council, Harwell, Didcot,
More informationInnate Immunity. Chapter 3. Connection Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Know Differences and Provide Examples. Antimicrobial peptide psoriasin
Chapter Know Differences and Provide Examples Innate Immunity kin and Epithelial Barriers Antimicrobial peptide psoriasin -Activity against Gram (-) E. coli Connection Between Innate and Adaptive Immunity
More informationT Lymphocyte Activation and Costimulation. FOCiS. Lecture outline
1 T Lymphocyte Activation and Costimulation Abul K. Abbas, MD UCSF FOCiS 2 Lecture outline T cell activation Costimulation, the B7:CD28 family Inhibitory receptors of T cells Targeting costimulators for
More informationCell-Derived Inflammatory Mediators
Cell-Derived Inflammatory Mediators Introduction about chemical mediators in inflammation Mediators may be Cellular mediators cell-produced or cell-secreted derived from circulating inactive precursors,
More informationGeneration of the Immune Response
Generation of the Immune Response Sheet 18 immunity I only added extra notes that were explained in the lecture, refer back to the slides. SLIDE 3: In the generation of Immune response whether by B or
More informationDr. Yi-chi M. Kong August 8, 2001 Benjamini. Ch. 19, Pgs Page 1 of 10 TRANSPLANTATION
Benjamini. Ch. 19, Pgs 379-399 Page 1 of 10 TRANSPLANTATION I. KINDS OF GRAFTS II. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DONOR AND RECIPIENT Benjamini. Ch. 19, Pgs 379-399 Page 2 of 10 II.GRAFT REJECTION IS IMMUNOLOGIC
More informationImmunological Aspects of Parasitic Diseases in Immunocompromised Individuals. Taniawati Supali. Department of Parasitology
Immunological Aspects of Parasitic Diseases in Immunocompromised Individuals Taniawati Supali Department of Parasitology 1 Defense mechanism in human Th17 (? ) Acute Chronic Th1 Th 2 Intracellular Treg
More informationT Cell Activation, Costimulation and Regulation
1 T Cell Activation, Costimulation and Regulation Abul K. Abbas, MD University of California San Francisco 2 Lecture outline T cell antigen recognition and activation Costimulation, the B7:CD28 family
More informationScott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION
Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 scott.abrams@roswellpark.org Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION CHAPTER 13 Effector Responses: Cell- and Antibody-Mediated Immunity Copyright 2013 by W. H.
More informationLYMHOCYTE CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION ASSAY IN RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY
LYMHOCYTE CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION ASSAY IN RADIATION BIODOSIMETRY Dr. Birutė Gricienė 1,2 1 Radiation Protection Centre 2 Vilnius University Introduction Ionising radiation is a well-known mutagenic and
More informationProf. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology
By Prof. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology Lecture objectives: At the end of the lecture you should be able to: Enumerate features that characterize acquired immune response
More informationCellular Pathology of immunological disorders
Cellular Pathology of immunological disorders SCBM344 Cellular and Molecular Pathology Witchuda Payuhakrit, Ph.D (Pathobiology) witchuda.pay@mahidol.ac.th Objectives Describe the etiology of immunological
More informationCYTOKINE RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
CYTOKINE RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION What is Cytokine? Secreted popypeptide (protein) involved in cell-to-cell signaling. Acts in paracrine or autocrine fashion through specific cellular receptors.
More informationT Cell Activation. Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly March 18, 2009
T Cell Activation Patricia Fitzgerald-Bocarsly March 18, 2009 Phases of Adaptive Immune Responses Phases of T cell responses IL-2 acts as an autocrine growth factor Fig. 11-11 Clonal Expansion of T cells
More informationIntroduction to Cancer Biology
Introduction to Cancer Biology Robin Hesketh Multiple choice questions (choose the one correct answer from the five choices) Which ONE of the following is a tumour suppressor? a. AKT b. APC c. BCL2 d.
More informationImmunology Lecture 4. Clinical Relevance of the Immune System
Immunology Lecture 4 The Well Patient: How innate and adaptive immune responses maintain health - 13, pg 169-181, 191-195. Immune Deficiency - 15 Autoimmunity - 16 Transplantation - 17, pg 260-270 Tumor
More informationAdaptive immune responses: T cell-mediated immunity
MICR2209 Adaptive immune responses: T cell-mediated immunity Dr Allison Imrie allison.imrie@uwa.edu.au 1 Synopsis: In this lecture we will discuss the T-cell mediated immune response, how it is activated,
More informationRadiation Protection in the World of Modern Radiobiology: Time for A New Approach. R. E. J. Mitchel and D. R Boreham
Radiation Protection in the World of Modern Radiobiology: Time for A New Approach R. E. J. Mitchel and D. R Boreham Radiation Biology and Health Physics Branch, AECL, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River
More informationHLA and antigen presentation. Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol
HLA and antigen presentation Department of Immunology Charles University, 2nd Medical School University Hospital Motol MHC in adaptive immunity Characteristics Specificity Innate For structures shared
More informationMonocyte subsets in health and disease. Marion Frankenberger
Monocyte subsets in health and disease Marion Frankenberger main cellular components: Leukocytes Erythrocytes Composition of whole blood Monocytes belong to the cellular components of peripheral blood
More informationImmune Regulation and Tolerance
Immune Regulation and Tolerance Immunoregulation: A balance between activation and suppression of effector cells to achieve an efficient immune response without damaging the host. Activation (immunity)
More informationMolecular mechanisms of the T cellinflamed tumor microenvironment: Implications for cancer immunotherapy
Molecular mechanisms of the T cellinflamed tumor microenvironment: Implications for cancer immunotherapy Thomas F. Gajewski, M.D., Ph.D. Professor, Departments of Pathology and Medicine Program Leader,
More informationUnderstanding the Regulation of Antigen Specific T Helper Cells by Cytokines and Costimulatory Molecules Expressed on distintct Antigen Prtesenting
Researcher : Vinod Singh (2003) SUMMARY ---.,.-:-.., Guide : Agrewala, J.N.(Dr.) Understanding the Regulation of Antigen Specific T Helper Cells by Cytokines and Costimulatory Molecules Expressed on distintct
More informationImmune surveillance hypothesis (Macfarlane Burnet, 1950s)
TUMOR-IMMUNITÄT A.K. Abbas, A.H. Lichtman, S. Pillai (6th edition, 2007) Cellular and Molecular Immunology Saunders Elsevier Chapter 17, immunity to tumors Immune surveillance hypothesis (Macfarlane Burnet,
More information