Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An epidemiological perspective

Transcription

1 Combined Exposures to Dangerous Substances in the Workplace; An epidemiological perspective Roel Vermeulen, PhD Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences University of Utrecht

2 Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences An interfacultary research institute within the faculties Veterinary Medicine, Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Biology of Utrecht University The mission of IRAS is to provide education and research on the human health risks of exposure to potentially harmful agents in the environment, at the workplace and through the food chain

3 Dr. Roel Vermeulen Background: Environmental Health Toxicology Epidemiology Focus area IRAS Cancer Epidemiology Hemato- Lymphopoietic disorders Lung Molecular epidemiology

4 Focus Area Environmental Cancer Hemato- Lymphopoietic disorders Benzene Dioxin Electromagnetic fields Formaldehyde Trichloroethylene Selected pesticides Lung Asbestos Diesel exhaust Indoor air pollution Metals Polycyclic Hydrocarbons

5 Exposures in the Workplace are by Definition Complex Combined exposures to multiple chemicals Multiple exposures / complex mixtures Combined exposures to chemicals and psychosocial risk factors Occupational exposures and stress Combined exposures and lifestyle factors Occupational exposures and nutritional status

6 Synergistic or Antagonistic? Antagonistic Saturation of metabolic systems Synergistic Inflamation + genotoxicity

7 Epidemiological Evidence? Lung cancer risk associated with working in A) cotton textile industry and B) agricultural industry. A B Burm eister (1981) H e n d e r s o n ( ) M e r c h a n t ( ) Levin (1988) W ilkund (1988) Stark (1990) L e v in ( ) G unnardottir (1991) K o s k e la ( ) Alberghini (1991) Ronco (1992) H o d g s o n ( ) Faustini (1993) W u - W illia m s ( ) W iklund (1994) S z e s z e n ia - D a b r o w s k a ( ) M astrangelo (1996) Pukkala (1997) F r it s c h i ( ) Sperati (1999) K u z m ic k ie n e ( ) Jahn (1999) W ang (2002) A s t r a k ia n a k is ( ) Alavanja (2005) M a s t r a n g e lo ( ) M astrangelo (2005) Lee (2006) Laakkonen (2008) O verall (I-squared = 97.8%, p = 0.000) R R RR Lenters et al., submitted

8 Combined Exposures to Multiple Chemicals Rubber industry Cross-sectional survey on genotoxic exposures in the rubber industry RAPTES to characterize the physical, chemical and oxidant properties of inhaled particulate matter and establish which of these characteristics are critical determinates of adverse systemic and respiratory effects Synergy Synergistic effects of multiple exposures to lung carcinogens

9 The Rubber Industry The rubber industry has been associated with increased cancer risks: lung, bladder, larynx and leukemia 1 Exposure to a complex mixture of compounds Aromatic amines PAHs Carbon black Nitrosamines Solvents Both inhalation and dermal exposure 2 Current genotoxic risks largely unknown 1. IARC Monographs The rubber industry (1982) 2. Vermeulen et al. Occup Environ Med (2003)

10 Rubber Industry; Complex Mixture of Compounds

11 Particulate exposure; Mass and Mutagenicity Geometric mean particulate exposure (mg/m3) for each production function in each plant Geometric mean mutagenicity TSM exposure (rev/m3) for each production function in each plant mg/m mix pre mod cur fin ship es Production function lab Company Rev/m mix pre mod cur fin ship Production function lab Company

12 Potency Measures of Combined Exposures Relevance of potency measures? Mutagenicity Oxidant properties Metabonomics Legislation? Holmes et al., 2008

13 Pooled Analysis of European Case-control Studies on the Interaction of Occupational Carcinogens in the Development of Lung Cancer Included case-control studies: HDA AUT LUCAS TURIN-ROME EAGLE INCO-Copernicus LUCA PARIS ICARE EPIC Montreal Germany Germany Sweden Italy Italy Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, UK France France France The Netherlands Canada Overall almost 30,000 cases and controls

14 Targeted Exposures Lung Carcinogens Asbestos Chromium Nickel PAHs Respirable Crystalline Silica chrysotile (white asbestos); amphibole; other type chromium VI; total chromium soluble nickel compounds; insoluble nickel compounds; total nickel benzo(a)pyrene; naphthalene respirable quartz; respirable cristobalite; respirable tridymite; respirable crystalline silica 14

15 Challenges in Detecting Interactions The power to detect interactions in epidemiological studies is low: Increase in study size Improved exposure assessment methods

16 Joint Exposure Prevalences asb 4722 (33%) pah cr ni as mmmf rcs dme 3008 (21%) pah 3502 (24%) 1467 (10%) 2196 (15%) cr 2217 (16%) 396 (3%) 2873( 20%) 296 (2%) ni 281 (2%) 1714 (12%) 1641 (12%) 1607 (11%) 248 (2%) 933 (7%) 3744 (26%) 912 (6%) 80 (1%) as 81 (1%) 2389 (17%) mmmf 723 (5%) 1748 (12%) 4656 (32%) 81 (1%) (16%) rcs 2902 (20%) 17

17 Joint Exposure Prevalences - High pah cr ni as mmmf rcs dme asb 567 (4%) pah (5%) Cr Ni As mmmf (4%) rcs 438 (3%)

18 Highest Joint Exposure Prevalences Highest joint prevalences found for: Asbestos and PAH (33%; 4% high) PAH and diesel (32%; 4% high) PAH and silica (26%; 5% high) Silica and diesel (20%; 3% high) Relatively low joint prevalences

19 Challenges in Detecting Interactions The power to detect interactions in epidemiological studies is low: Increase in study size Improved exposure assessment methods

20 Improved Exposure Assessment Required data: Personal measurement data is preferred above stationary Individual data points needed to build multivariate models Auxiliary data, such as: Purpose/strategy of measurement Sampling devices Analytical procedures 20

21 Data collection So far Data being entered at moment Data already in ExpoSYN (n ~28,000) ** Canada ** ** Czech Rep. ** Denmark Finland ** France ** ** Germany ** ** Hungary ** Iceland ** Italy ** ** NL ** Norway ** Poland ** ** Sweden ** ** UK ** ** Slovakia ** ** Romania ** ** Russia ** 21

22 Research Actions Integration of functional test systems into epidemiological research Improved exposure assessment tools Better utilization of existing data? Large epidemiological studies on occupational risk factors

23 Contact Information