Prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Marc Buyse International Drug Development Institute (IDDI) Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
|
|
- Beatrix Sophia Hudson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Prognostic and predictive biomarkers Marc Buyse International Drug Development Institute (IDDI) Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 1
2 Prognostic biomarkers (example: gene signature) 2
3 PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURES Measure 25,000 genes in RNA from breast tumors Apply algorithm to identify classifier Class of good prognosis Class of poor prognosis 3
4 MAMMAPRINT Measure 25,000 genes in RNA from breast tumors Apply algorithm to identify classifier Good prognosis (no metastases at 5 years) Agendia 24,479 probe sets Poor prognosis (metastases within 5 years) Ref: van t Veer et al, Nature 2002; 415:
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 GENE SIGNATURES IN BREAST CANCER 70-gene «Amsterdam» signature (MammaPrint, Agendia) 76-gene «Rotterdam» signature (Veridex) 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health) 97-gene «genomic grade» (MapQuant Dx, Ipsogen) and others These signatures were identified using different criteria and include different sets of genes. Yet they are broadly similar in their ability to classify patients to good or poor prognosis. 8
9 Ref: van de Vijver et al, NEJM 2002;347,1999
10 Impressive odds ratio: OR = (31 / 18) / (3 / 26) = 15.0 Ref: van de Vijver et al, NEJM 2002;347,1999
11 BUT poor predictive accuracy Sensitivity = 31 / 34 =.91 Specificity = 26 / 44 =.59
12 Sensitivity Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power 1-Specificity Ref: Pepe, Statist Med 2005; 24:
13 Sensitivity Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power Sensitivity = 91% 1-Specificity Ref: Pepe, Statist Med 2005; 24:
14 Sensitivity Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power Sensitivity = 91% Specificity = 59% 1-Specificity Ref: Pepe, Statist Med 2005; 24:
15 Probability of distant metastasis at 5 years ALL SIGNATURES HAVE POOR PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Sensitivity: 52/56=93% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Good-Prognosis Group Poor-Prognosis Group 10% Specificity: 55/115=48% 0% Relapse Hazard Score Adapted from Foekens, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
16 ALL SIGNATURES HAVE POOR PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Average risk = 7% 14% 31% < > 30 Ref: Paik et al, NEJM 2004;351,2817
17 Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power Ref: Royston et al, JNCI 2008; 100:92. 17
18 Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power Ref: Royston et al, JNCI 2008; 100:92. 18
19 Even Excellent Prognostic Models may Have Poor Discriminative Power 2-20 months Ref: Royston et al, JNCI 2008; 100:92. 19
20 THE YOUDEN INDEX AS A MEASURE OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Youden Index = Sensitivity + Specificity 1 Worst Useless * -1 0 Perfect 1 * Useless because a classification independent of true risk would classify patients equally well Ref: Youden D. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3: 32.
21 THE YOUDEN INDEX AS A MEASURE OF PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Youden Index = Sensitivity + Specificity 1 Worst Useless * -1 0 Perfect 1 Region of interest * Useless because a classification independent of true risk would classify patients equally well Ref: Youden D. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 1950; 3: 32.
22 Sensitivity = 31 / 34 =.91 Specificity = 26 / 44 =.59 Youden Index = = 0.50
23 CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS ALSO HAVE POOR PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Metastases within 5 years Sensitivity Specificity Youden Index Gene signature (Amsterdam validation) Gene signature (independent validation) Nottingham Prognostic Index Adjuvant! Online St Gallen criteria Ref: Buyse et al, JNCI 2006; 98:1183.
24 THE YOUDEN INDEX FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATIONS Amsterdam validation Y = 0.50 Independent validation Y = 0.32 Nottingham Prognostic Index Y = 0.23 Adjuvant! Online Y = 0.16 St Gallen Y =
25 CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS ALSO HAVE POOR PREDICTIVE ACCURACY Metastases within 5 years Sensitivity Specificity Youden Index Gene signature Adjuvant! Online Adjuvant! Online concordant with gene signature Adjuvant! Online discordant with gene signature Ref: Buyse et al, JNCI 2006; 98:1183.
26 THE YOUDEN INDEX FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATIONS Adjuvant! discordant with gene signature Y = Independent validation Y = 0.32 Adjuvant! Online Y = 0.16 Adjuvant! concordant with gene signature Y =
27
28
29 IRRELEVANT SIGNATURES DISCRIMINATE HIGH AND LOW RISK PATIENTS! Ref: Venet et al, PLoS Computational Biol 2011; 7:e
30 IRRELEVANT SIGNATURES DISCRIMINATE HIGH AND LOW RISK PATIENTS! Effect of postprandial laughter on peripheral blood mononuclear cells Skin fibroblast localization Social defeat (mice brain) Ref: Venet et al, PLoS Computational Biol 2011; 7:e
31 RANDOM SIGNATURES DISCRIMINATE HIGH AND LOW RISK PATIENTS! Of 1890 signatures from the MsigDB database, 67% are associated with breast cancer outcome at P <.05 27% are associated with breast cancer outcome at P < 10-5 Cell proliferation integrates most of the prognostic information present in the breast cancer transcriptome. Ref: Venet et al, PLoS Computational Biol 2011; 7:e
32 SOME SIGNATURES REMAIN SIGNIFICANT AFTER ADJUSTMENT FOR PROLIFERATION Red squares: OS hazard ratios after adjustment for the top 1% genes more strongly correlated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) Ref: Venet et al, PLoS Computational Biol 2011; 7:e
33 Predictive biomarkers (example: gene mutation) 33
34 A Predictive Biomarker in NSCLC 34
35 Gefitinib vs. Chemotherapy in NSCLC Ref: Mok et al, NEJM 2009;361:947 35
36 Gefitinib vs. Chemo: EGFR Mutation Ref: Slides courtesy of Astra-Zeneca 36
37 Gefitinib vs. Chemo: No EGFR Mutation Ref: Slides courtesy of Astra-Zeneca 37
38 Gefitinib is Either Better or Worse (Qualitative Interaction) Ref: Slides courtesy of Astra-Zeneca 38
39 Validation of Predictive Biomarkers Need to show interaction between the biomarker levels at baseline, or changes of biomarker over time, and treatment effect Hence, randomized evidence is usually needed (to estimate treatment effects by biomarker levels reliably) And, interaction test has very low power 39
40 Gefitinib is Either Better or Worse (Qualitative Interaction) Treatment HR = 0.74 Interaction HR = HR(EGFR M+) / HR (EGFR M-) = 0.48 / 2.85 = 0.17 interaction effect size >> treatment effect size Interaction highly significant 40
41 Interaction Test Has a Very Low Power Inflation factor required to increase the sample size so that the interaction test has the same power as the original sample size had for the overall treatment effect. Ref: Brookes et al., J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:229 41
42 Interaction Test Has a Very Low Power 1 Inflation factor required to increase the sample size so that the interaction test has the same power as the original sample size had for the overall treatment effect. Ref: Brookes et al.; J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:229 42
43 Interaction Test Has a Very Low Power 4 1 Inflation factor required to increase the sample size so that the interaction test has the same power as the original sample size had for the overall treatment effect. Ref: Brookes et al.; J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:229 43
44 Interaction Test Has a Very Low Power 0.5 Inflation factor required to increase the sample size so that the interaction test has the same power as the original sample size had for the overall treatment effect. Ref: Brookes et al.; J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:229 44
45 Interaction Test Has a Very Low Power Inflation factor required to increase the sample size so that the interaction test has the same power as the original sample size had for the overall treatment effect. Ref: Brookes et al.; J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:229 45
46 Validation and clinical utility Validation is relatively straightforward for prognostic biomarkers (independent of treatment) but, what is the clinical relevance? Validation is extremely challenging for predictive biomarkers (need for large randomized evidence) but clinical relevance is clear! 46
Statistical validation of biomarkers and surogate endpoints
Statistical validation of biomarkers and surogate endpoints Marc Buyse, ScD IDDI, Louvain-la-Neuve & Hasselt University, Belgium marc.buyse@iddi.com OUTLINE 1. Setting the scene: definitions and types
More informationMammaPrint, the story of the 70-gene profile
MammaPrint, the story of the 70-gene profile René Bernards Professor of Molecular Carcinogenesis The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam Chief Scientific Officer Agendia Amsterdam The breast cancer
More information30 years of progress in cancer research
Breast Cancer Molecular Knowledge Integrated in Clinical Practice Personalized Medicine Laura J. Esserman UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center Retreat Breast Cancer Management Advances 80-90s 1) Screening
More informationMammaPrint Improving treatment decisions in breast cancer Support and Involvement of EU
MammaPrint Improving treatment decisions in breast cancer Support and Involvement of EU 1 Bas van der Baan VP Clinical Affairs Irvine, California Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Two Crucial Questions in Cancer
More informationBreast cancer: Molecular STAGING classification and testing. Korourian A : AP,CP ; MD,PHD(Molecular medicine)
Breast cancer: Molecular STAGING classification and testing Korourian A : AP,CP ; MD,PHD(Molecular medicine) Breast Cancer Theory: Halsted Operative breast cancer is a local-regional disease The positive
More informationISPOR 4 th Asia Pacific Conference IP2 Gilberto de Lima Lopes
Health Economic Considerations for Personalized Medicine in Asia: Using Genomic Profiling to Guide Treatment Decisions in Early Breast Cancer Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Jr., M.D., M.B.A Assistant Director
More informationMultigene Testing in NCCN Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines, v1.2011
Multigene Testing in NCCN Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines, v1.2011 Robert W. Carlson, M.D. Professor of Medicine Stanford University Chair, NCCN Breast Cancer Treatment Guidelines Panel Selection of
More informationThe 70-Gene Signature (MammaPrint) As a Guide for the Management of Early Stage Breast Cancer. California Technology Assessment Forum
TITLE: The 70-Gene Signature (MammaPrint) As a Guide for the Management of Early Stage Breast Cancer AUTHOR: Jeffrey A. Tice, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of General Internal Medicine Department
More informationProfili di espressione genica
Profili di espressione genica Giampaolo Bianchini MD Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan - Italy Gene expression profiles Transcriptomics Gene DNA mrna mirnas Protein metilation Metabolite Genomics Transcriptomics
More informationThe Current Status and the Future Prospects of Multigene testing in Europe
The Current Status and the Future Prospects of Multigene testing in Europe Emiel J. Rutgers The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam St. Gallen Recommendations 2009 =
More informationGene Signatures in Breast Cancer: Moving Beyond ER, PR, and HER2? Lisa A. Carey, M.D. University of North Carolina USA
Gene Signatures in Breast Cancer: Moving Beyond ER, PR, and HER2? Lisa A. Carey, M.D. University of North Carolina USA When Are Biomarkers Ready To Use? Same Rules for Gene Expression Panels Key elements
More informationRole of Genomic Profiling in (Minimally) Node Positive Breast Cancer
Role of Genomic Profiling in (Minimally) Node Positive Breast Cancer Kathy S. Albain, MD, FACP Professor of Medicine Dean s Scholar Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine Cardinal Bernardin
More informationContemporary Classification of Breast Cancer
Contemporary Classification of Breast Cancer Laura C. Collins, M.D. Vice Chair of Anatomic Pathology Professor of Pathology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA Outline
More informationOVERVIEW OF GENE EXPRESSION-BASED TESTS IN EARLY BREAST CANCER
OVERVIEW OF GENE EXPRESSION-BASED TESTS IN EARLY BREAST CANCER Aleix Prat, MD PhD Medical Oncology Department Hospital Clínic of Barcelona University of Barcelona esmo.org Disclosures Advisory role for
More informationGenomic platforms in breast cancer
Genomic platforms in breast cancer Prof. Miguel Martín Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Gregorio Marañón Universidad Complutense Madrid mmartin@geicam.org Disclosure Dr. Martin has received
More informationHER2 status assessment in breast cancer. Marc van de Vijver Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam
HER2 status assessment in breast cancer Marc van de Vijver Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam 13e Bossche Mamma Congres 17 th June 2015 Modern cancer therapies are based on sophisticated molecular
More informationAre Genomics and proteomics biomarkers ready for prime time? National Cancer Policy Forum workshop Pierre P. Massion, MD
Are Genomics and proteomics biomarkers ready for prime time? National Cancer Policy Forum workshop Pierre P. Massion, MD 10-05-07 Outline 1. Use of omics in patient diagnosis or stratification in cancer:
More informationSession thématisée Les Innovations diagnostiques en cancérologie
10 èmes Journées Scientifiques du Cancéropôle Nord-Ouest 10-12 mai 2017, Deauville Session thématisée Les Innovations diagnostiques en cancérologie Les signatures multigéniques pronostiques dans le cancer
More informationCurrent Status and Future Development of Tools for Prognosis and Prediction - USA
Current Status and Future Development of Tools for Prognosis and Prediction - USA John H. Ward, MD Professor of Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute October18, 2009
More informationn. 5 TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY PRODUCER / SUPPLIER USE CATEGORY THERAPEUTIC OR DIAGNOSTIC FIELD OF APPLICATION PATIENTS / CLINICAL CONDITION
TECHNOLOGY In vitro test, based on a microarray methodology, that measures the level of activity of genes in a sample of surgically removed breast of women treated for breast cancer. The test is used to
More informationAssessment of Risk Recurrence: Adjuvant Online, OncotypeDx & Mammaprint
Assessment of Risk Recurrence: Adjuvant Online, OncotypeDx & Mammaprint William J. Gradishar, MD Professor of Medicine Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University Classical
More informationAdjuvan Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Adjuvan Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Prof Dr Adnan Aydıner Istanbul University, Oncology Institute aa1 Slide 1 aa1 adnan aydiner; 17.02.2008 15-Year Reductions in Recurrence and Disease-Specific Mortality
More informationJanet E. Dancey NCIC CTG NEW INVESTIGATOR CLINICAL TRIALS COURSE. August 9-12, 2011 Donald Gordon Centre, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario
Janet E. Dancey NCIC CTG NEW INVESTIGATOR CLINICAL TRIALS COURSE August 9-12, 2011 Donald Gordon Centre, Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario Session: Correlative Studies in Phase III Trials Title: Design
More informationRelevancia práctica de la clasificación de subtipos intrínsecos en cáncer de mama Miguel Martín Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón
Relevancia práctica de la clasificación de subtipos intrínsecos en cáncer de mama Miguel Martín Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón Universidad Complutense Madrid The new technologies
More informationLuminal A and B Where are we? (or lost in translation?)
Luminal A and B Where are we? (or lost in translation?) Emiel J. Rutgers The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam How to determine adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for
More informationProfili Genici e Personalizzazione del trattamento adiuvante nel carcinoma mammario G. RICCIARDI
Profili Genici e Personalizzazione del trattamento adiuvante nel carcinoma mammario G. RICCIARDI UOC Oncologia Medica, A.O. Papardo, Messina Dir. Prof. V. Adamo BREAST CANCER Brain Adjuvant Medical Therapies
More informationNational Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Foundation Annual Progress Report: 2009 Formula Grant
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Foundation Annual Progress Report: 2009 Formula Grant Reporting Period July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 Formula Grant Overview The National Surgical
More informationA breast cancer gene signature for indolent disease
Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 164:461 466 DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4262-0 EPIDEMIOLOGY A breast cancer gene signature for indolent disease Leonie J. M. J. Delahaye 1 Caroline A. Drukker 2,3 Christa Dreezen
More informationGene-Expression Profiling and the Future of Adjuvant Therapy
Gene-Expression Profiling and the Future of Adjuvant Therapy Marc van de Vijver Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Key Words. Gene-expression profiling Prognostic
More informationNew Developments in Cancer Treatment. Ian Rabinowitz MD
New Developments in Cancer Treatment Ian Rabinowitz MD Treatment Outline Angiogenesis inhibition Targeted therapy Immunotherapy Personalization of therapy Genomics and cancer Stem cells and cancer Angiogenesis
More information8/8/2011. PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer. Overview
Overview PONDERing the Need to TAILOR Adjuvant in ER+ Node Positive Breast Cancer Jennifer K. Litton, M.D. Assistant Professor The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Using multigene assay
More informationBreast Cancer: Who Gets It? Who Survives? The Latest Information
Breast Cancer: Who Gets It? Who Survives? The Latest Information James J. Stark, MD, FACP Medical Director, Cancer Program and Director of Palliative Care Maryview Medical Center Professor of Medicine
More informationMolecular Characterization of Breast Cancer: The Clinical Significance
Molecular Characterization of : The Clinical Significance Shahla Masood, M.D. Professor and Chair Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville
More informationAdjuvant endocrine therapy (essentials in ER positive early breast cancer)
Adjuvant endocrine therapy (essentials in ER positive early breast cancer) Giuseppe Curigliano MD, PhD Breast Cancer Program Division of Experimental Therapeutics Outline Picking optimal adjuvant endocrine
More informationPredictive Assays in Radiation Therapy
Outline Predictive Assays in Radiation Therapy Radiation Biology Introduction Early predictive assays Recent trends in predictive assays Examples for specific tumors Summary Lecture 4-23-2014 Introduction
More informationPersonalized Treatment Breast Cancer MammaPrint Science to Healthcare
Personalized Treatment Breast Cancer MammaPrint Science to Healthcare Laura J. van t Veer University of California, San Francisco & Agendia, Amsterdam/Irvine EC conference - 2019 Integrating Genomics into
More informationMEDICAL POLICY. SUBJECT: GENETIC ASSAY OF TUMOR TISSUE TO DETERMINE PROGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER (OncotypeDX TM, MammaPrint )
MEDICAL POLICY PAGE: 1 OF: 8 If the member's subscriber contract excludes coverage for a specific service it is not covered under that contract. In such cases, medical policy criteria are not applied.
More informationGene Expression Profiling for Managing Breast Cancer Treatment. Policy Specific Section: Medical Necessity and Investigational / Experimental
Medical Policy Gene Expression Profiling for Managing Breast Cancer Treatment Type: Medical Necessity and Investigational / Experimental Policy Specific Section: Laboratory/Pathology Original Policy Date:
More informationMaking Understanding Molecular Profiles Less Painful. Presenter Disclosure Information
Welcome to Master Class for Oncologists Miami, FL December 18, 2009 Session 1: 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM Towards Personalized Medicine in Breast Cancer: Understanding Molecular Subtypes and the Role of Diagnostics
More informationHormone therapyduration: Can weselectthosepatientswho benefitfromtreatmentextension?
Hormone therapyduration: Can weselectthosepatientswho benefitfromtreatmentextension? Ivana Sestak, PhD Centre for Cancer Prevention Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine Queen Mary University London
More informationProtocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.
Protocol This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Protocol for: Cardoso F, van t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, et al. 70-Gene signature as an
More informationReliable Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Genomic Tests
Reliable Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Genomic Tests Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute http://brb.nci.nih.gov Different Kinds of Biomarkers Prognostic
More informationType: Evidence Based Evidence Quality: High Strength of Recommendation: Strong
Clinical Question 1: For women with early-stage invasive breast cancer and with known estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 status), which other
More informationUvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Prognostic factors in breast cancer: one fits all? Mook, S. Link to publication
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Prognostic factors in breast cancer: one fits all? Mook, S. Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Mook, S. (2011). Prognostic factors in breast
More informationOnly Estrogen receptor positive is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer
Young Investigator Award, Global Breast Cancer Conference 2018 Only Estrogen receptor positive is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer ㅑ Running head: Revisiting estrogen positive tumors
More informationNational Medical Policy
National Medical Policy Subject: Policy Number: MammaPrint, Prosigna and Other Gene Expression Tests for Breast Cancer NMP520 Effective Date*: May 2013 Updated: June 2017 This National Medical Policy is
More informationUK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin
UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin Professor of Surgery National University of Ireland, Galway and Galway University
More informationGenomic Profiling in Early Stage Breast Cancer. James V. Pellicane, MD, FACS Director of Breast Oncology Bon Secours Cancer Institute Richmond, VA
Genomic Profiling in Early Stage Breast Cancer James V. Pellicane, MD, FACS Director of Breast Oncology Bon Secours Cancer Institute Richmond, VA 1 Disclosures Speakers Bureau Agendia Focal Therapeutics
More informationJules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Breast International Group (BIG aisbl), Chair ESMO President
Symposium «Evaluation of the Belgian Cancer Plan» Brussels, November 26th, 2012 Personalized oncology in Europe: only a dream if national health systems do not get involved in diagnostics and pivotal cancer
More informationProsigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY
Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY Methodology The test is based on the reported 50-gene classifier algorithm originally named PAM50 and is performed on the ncounter Dx Analysis System
More informationProsigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY
Prosigna BREAST CANCER PROGNOSTIC GENE SIGNATURE ASSAY GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING WITH PROSIGNA What is Prosigna? Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay is an FDA-approved assay which provides
More informationPersonalized Therapy for Prostate Cancer due to Genetic Testings
Personalized Therapy for Prostate Cancer due to Genetic Testings Stephen J. Freedland, MD Professor of Urology Director, Center for Integrated Research on Cancer and Lifestyle Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
More informationTumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in people with breast cancer (update of DG10).
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in people with breast cancer (update of DG10). Erratum to the EAG Diagnostic Assessment Report Produced by: Sheffield University School of
More informationBreast cancer classification: beyond the intrinsic molecular subtypes
Breast cancer classification: beyond the intrinsic molecular subtypes Britta Weigelt, PhD Signal Transduction Laboratory CRUK London Research Institute Summary Breast cancer heterogeneity Molecular classification
More informationIII Congreso Internacional de Oncologia del Interior XII Jornadas de Oncologia del Interior Cordoba Argentina. Farmacogenomica y Cancer de Mama
III Congreso Internacional de Oncologia del Interior XII Jornadas de Oncologia del Interior Cordoba Argentina Farmacogenomica y Cancer de Mama Vicente Valero, M.D., F.A.C.P. Professor of Medicine Deputy
More informationMechanisms of Resistance to. Lisa A. Carey, M.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Mechanisms of Resistance to Hormonal Therapy Lisa A. Carey, M.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Antagonizing Estrogen Dependent Growth Premenopausal
More informationTumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer:
Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: EAG Addendum to responses to Comments on DCD2 (5 June 2018) This document provides the EAG s responses to key themes
More informationBreast Cancer Heterogeneity
Breast Cancer Heterogeneity Session 2: 8:15 AM 9:00 AM Molecular Subsets and Molecular Diagnostics in Breast Cancer ER + subtypes ER-negative subtypes Lisa A. Carey, MD University of North Carolina Lineberger
More informationDIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME
DIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Evidence overview Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in people with breast cancer (update of DG10) This overview summarises the key issues
More informationClassification of cancer profiles. ABDBM Ron Shamir
Classification of cancer profiles 1 Background: Cancer Classification Cancer classification is central to cancer treatment; Traditional cancer classification methods: location; morphology, cytogenesis;
More informationSearch for Randox, Blueprint, PAM50, Breast Cancer Index, IHC4, Mammostrat, and NPI+ Date limits = 2002 date Filter = human studies only
Appendix 1 Search strategy Update search for Oncotype DX, and MammaPrint Date limits = January 2009 date Filter = human studies only 1. exp Breast Neoplasms/ 2. exp mammary neoplasms/ 3. exp "Neoplasms,
More informationBridging Genomics and Therapy Creating a Theranostics Paradigm
Bridging Genomics and Therapy Creating a Theranostics Paradigm Samuel Abraham, PhD VP Strategic Relationships BC Cancer Agency Diponkar Banerjee MBChB, PhD, FRCPC Executive Medical Director PHSA Laboratories
More informationBig data vs. the individual liver from a regulatory perspective
Big data vs. the individual liver from a regulatory perspective Robert Schuck, Pharm.D., Ph.D. Genomics and Targeted Therapy Office of Clinical Pharmacology Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food
More informationThe Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer
The Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer Cancer The Biology Century Understanding and treating the underlying tumor biology Cancer genetic studies demonstrate
More informationRationale For & Design of TAILORx. Joseph A. Sparano, MD Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center Bronx, New York
Rationale For & Design of TAILORx Joseph A. Sparano, MD Albert Einstein College of Medicine Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center Bronx, New York Declining Breast Cancer Mortality & Event Rates in Adjuvant
More informationMedical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association
Assays of Genetic Expression in Tumor Tissue as a Technique Page 1 of 47 Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Title: Assays of Genetic Expression in Tumor Tissue
More informationMolecular in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative detection of the mrna expression of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 in breast cancer tissue.
Innovation for your breast cancer diagnostics PGR G ATA G C G A C G AT C G A A A G A A G T TA G ATA G C G A C G AT C G A A A G A A G T TA G ATA G C G A C G AT C G A A A G A A G T TA G ATA G C G A C ERBB2
More informationSPECIAL PLENARY SESSION: Results of MINDACT clinical trial
SPECIAL PLENARY SESSION: Results of MINDACT clinical trial S Delaloge, Gustave Roussy On behalf of the European Commissionsupported TRANSBIG consortium and MINDACT investigators - 10041-3-04 «Microarray
More informationHeather Wakelee, M.D.
Heather Wakelee, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine, Oncology Stanford University Sponsored by Educational Grant Support from Adjuvant (Post-Operative) Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Heather Wakelee, M.D.
More informationLearning Objectives. Financial Disclosure. Breast Cancer Quality Improvement Project with Oncotype DX. Nothing to disclose
Breast Cancer Quality Improvement Project with Oncotype DX Denise Johnson Miller, MD, FACS Medical Director Breast Surgery Hackensack Meridian Health Legacy Meridian (Jersey Shore University Medical Center,
More informationHarmesh Naik, MD. Hope Cancer Clinic PERSONALIZED CANCER TREATMENT USING LATEST IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Harmesh Naik, MD. Hope Cancer Clinic PERSONALIZED CANCER TREATMENT USING LATEST IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY A NEW GENE A DAY.WHILE YOU ARE ENJOYING MORNING COFFEE From cancer.gov GOALS FOR THE CME TODAY A brief
More informationModern classification of breast cancer-should we stick with morphology or convert to molecular profiles?
Modern classification of breast cancer-should we stick with morphology or convert to molecular profiles? Ian Ellis Professor of Cancer Pathology Molecular Medical Sciences University of Nottingham Dept
More informationMolecular in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative detection of the mrna expression of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 in breast cancer tissue.
Innovation for your breast cancer diagnostics Now valid ated on: -Roche cob as z 480 A nalyzer -Roche L ightcycle r 480 II - ABI 750 0 Fast -Versant kpcr Cyc ler PGR ESR1 MKI67 Molecular in vitro diagnostic
More informationResearch Article Breast Cancer Prognosis Risk Estimation Using Integrated Gene Expression and Clinical Data
BioMed Research International, Article ID 459203, 15 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/459203 Research Article Breast Cancer Prognosis Risk Estimation Using Integrated Gene Expression and Clinical Data
More informationSeigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D.
Seigo Nakamura,M.D.,Ph.D. Professor of Surgery Director of Breast Center Showa University Hospital Chairman of the board of directors Japan Breast Cancer Society Inhibition of Estrogen-Dependent Growth
More information1 INTRODUCTION REVIEW ARTICLE
Received: 12 December 2016 Revised: 15 December 2016 Accepted: 15 December 2016 DOI 10.1002/jso.24561 REVIEW ARTICLE Selecting postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy for early stage breast cancer: A critical
More informationThe Ideal Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1/25 The Ideal Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model: A Randomized Clinical Trial Holly Janes Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 2/25 Context Often a risk prediction model is developed to identify
More informationThe Oncotype DX Assay A Genomic Approach to Breast Cancer
The Oncotype DX Assay A Genomic Approach to Breast Cancer Pathology: 20 th and 21 st Century Size Age Phenotype Nodal status Protein/Gene Genomic Profiling Prognostic & Predictive Markers Used in Breast
More informationConcordance among Gene-Expression Based Predictors for Breast Cancer
The new england journal of medicine original article Concordance among Gene-Expression Based Predictors for Breast Cancer Cheng Fan, M.S., Daniel S. Oh, Ph.D., Lodewyk Wessels, Ph.D., Britta Weigelt, Ph.D.,
More informationIntegrating biomarkers in clinical trials
ert Review of Molecular Diagnostics ISSN: 1473-7159 (Print) 1744-8352 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iero20 Integrating biomarkers in clinical trials Marc Buyse, Stefan Michiels,
More information38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx. Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI %
38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI67 5-10% Question: What will you do now? 1. Give adjuvant chemotherapy 2. Send for Oncotype
More informationIntegrative analysis of survival-associated gene sets in breast cancer
Varn et al. BMC Medical Genomics (2015) 8:11 DOI 10.1186/s12920-015-0086-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Integrative analysis of survival-associated gene sets in breast cancer Frederick S Varn 1, Matthew
More informationOverview of Biomarker Development for Immune PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Blockade
Overview of Biomarker Development for Immune PD-1/L1 Checkpoint Blockade David L. Rimm MD-PhD Professor Departments of Pathology and Medicine (Oncology) Director, Yale Pathology Tissue Services Disclosures
More informationInput from patient representatives, external expert and manufacturer on the 2nd draft assessment MammaPrint - Added value of using gene-expression
Input from patient representatives, external expert and manufacturer on the 2nd draft assessment MammaPrint - Added value of using gene-expression signature for adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early
More informationCancer Biomarkers, Clinical Trials, and New Treatment Options. Joseph A. Sparano, MD
Cancer Biomarkers, Clinical Trials, and New Treatment Options Joseph A. Sparano, MD Professor of Medicine & Women s s Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine Associate Chairman, Dept. of Medical Oncology
More informationupa: From Pilot Studies to Recommendation for Clinical Use Professor Joe Duffy St Vincent s University Hospital,
upa: From Pilot Studies to Recommendation for Clinical Use Professor Joe Duffy St Vincent s University Hospital, Dublin and University College Dublin Most Important t Questions After a Diagnosis of Breast
More informationBiomarkers for HER2-directed Therapies : Past Failures and Future Perspectives
Biomarkers for HER2-directed Therapies : Past Failures and Future Perspectives Ian Krop Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Inchon 2018 Adjuvant Trastuzumab Improves Outcomes in HER2+ Breast
More informationLinking Tissue Microarchitectures to Rationalized Molecular Diagnostics in Glandular Cancers
Linking Tissue Microarchitectures to Rationalized Molecular Diagnostics in Glandular Cancers Kelvin K. Tsai, M.D., Ph.D. Laboratory for Tumor Epigenetics and Stemness (TES Lab) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CANCER
More informationShe counts on your breast cancer expertise at the most vulnerable time of her life.
HOME She counts on your breast cancer expertise at the most vulnerable time of her life. Empowering the right treatment choice for better patient outcomes. The comprehensive genomic assay experts trust.
More informationImmunohistochemical classification of breast tumours
Immunohistochemical classification of breast tumours Workshop in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry September 19 th - 21 th 2018 Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital,
More informationGene signature for risk stratification and treatment of breast cancer: Incorporating tumor biology in clinical decision-making Drukker, Caroline
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Gene signature for risk stratification and treatment of breast cancer: Incorporating tumor biology in clinical decision-making Drukker, Caroline Link to publication
More informationBreast Cancer Assays of Genetic Expression in Tumor Tissue
Breast Cancer Assays of Genetic Expression in Tumor Tissue Policy Number: Original Effective Date: MM.12.009 12/02/2008 Line(s) of Business: Current Effective Date Section: 05/25/2018 Other Miscellaneous
More informationOncotype DX MM /01/2008. HMO; PPO; QUEST 03/01/2014 Section: Other/Miscellaneous Place(s) of Service: Office
Oncotype DX Policy Number: Original Effective Date: MM.12.009 12/01/2008 Line(s) of Business: Current Effective Date: HMO; PPO; QUEST 03/01/2014 Section: Other/Miscellaneous Place(s) of Service: Office
More informationmicrornas (mirna) and Biomarkers
micrornas (mirna) and Biomarkers Small RNAs Make Big Splash mirnas & Genome Function Biomarkers in Cancer Future Prospects Javed Khan M.D. National Cancer Institute EORTC-NCI-ASCO November 2007 The Human
More informationCombinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer
Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer Emad A. Rakha, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ian O. Ellis To cite this version: Emad A. Rakha, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ian O. Ellis. Combinatorial biomarker expression
More informationTamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with 70-gene signature high and low risk
Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 166:593 601 DOI 10.1007/s10549-017-4428-9 EPIDEMIOLOGY Tamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with 70-gene signature high and low risk Laura J. van t Veer 1 Christina Yau
More informationClaudin-4 Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation with Androgen Receptors and Ki-67 Expression
Claudin-4 Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation with Androgen Receptors and Ki-67 Expression Mona A. Abd-Elazeem, Marwa A. Abd- Elazeem Pathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta
More informationEARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY. Dr. Carlos Garbino
EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY Dr. Carlos Garbino EARLY BREAST CANCER ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY SUSTANTIVE DIFFICULTIES FOR A WORLDWIDE APPLICABILITY DUE TO IMPORTANT INEQUALITIES + IN DIFFERENT
More informationOUTLINE PAST PRESENTFUTURE BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY CURRENT STATE OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY SECOND ANNUAL BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM
OUTLINE CURRENT STATE OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY SECOND ANNUAL BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM October 11, 2014 SARA M GARRIDO, M.D., F.A.C.P Chief Medical Officer at AMS Miami, October 11, 2014 PAST PRESENTFUTURE -BRIEF
More information