Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland 3

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland 3"

Transcription

1 Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 101: , 2012 Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery a prospective observational study with a two-year follow-up T. Aalto 1, S. Sinikallio 2, H. Kröger 3, H. Viinamäki 4, A. Herno 5, V. Leinonen 6, V. Turunen 7, S. Savolainen 6, O. Airaksinen 5 1 Kyyhkylä Rehabilitation Center and Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland 2 Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland 3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital and Bone Cartilage Research Unit, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland 4 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Psychiatry. University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland 5 Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland 6 Department of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland 7 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland Abstract Background and Aims: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most frequent indication for back surgery in adults aged over 65 years, but about one-third of operated patients have less than good/excellent results from the operation. Awareness of outcome predictors and their predictive values may help clinicians in their assessment of the prognosis of patients when considering surgical treatment. Our aim was to study the preoperative predictors in LSS for a good postoperative outcome (satisfaction with surgery and functional improvement) with a two-year follow-up. Material and Methods: LSS patients (n = 102) completed a questionnaire preoperatively and on two-year follow-up. Preoperative patient-related predictors, self-rated health, comorbidities and preoperative treatment were assessed. Satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed with a seven-category scale; satisfaction was determined to be good if the patient response was condition has considerably improved or totally cured. Other responses ( condition has slightly improved or worse) represented poorer satisfaction. A good functional outcome was determined as > 30% relative improvement compared to the presurgery score in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: The predictors for good satisfaction were age < 75 years at operation (OR 4.03; 95% CI ; p = 0.012) and no previous lumbar operation (OR 3.65; 95% CI ; p = 0.031). Predictors for a good improvement in the ODI score were regular preoperative analgesic use < 12 months (OR 3.40; 95% CI ; p = 0.020), non-smoking (OR 3.47; 95% CI ; p = 0.035) and good (above average) self-rated health (OR 3.27; 95% CI ; p = 0.039). Correspondence: Timo J. Aalto, M.D. Kyyhkylä Rehabilitation Center Kyyhkyläntie 9 FI Mikkeli, Finland

2 256 T. Aalto, S. Sinikallio, H. Kröger, et al. Conclusions: In LSS, regular analgesic treatment preoperatively for 12 months or less, self-rated health above average and non-smoking predicted a good postoperative functional improvement. An age under 75 years and no previous lumbar operation predicted good postoperative satisfaction with the surgery. Key words: Lumbar stenosis; surgical treatment; predictor factor, outcome; satisfaction; disability Introduction Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly (1), but one-third of operated patients have less than good/ excellent results from the operation (2 6). The critical decision on whether and when to consider decompressive surgery requires an understanding of the expected surgical outcome, this being based extensively on radiological stenotic findings accompanied by coherent clinical symptoms. In addition, other preoperative factors also predict the postoperative outcome of spinal surgery (5, 7 10). Awareness of the predictors and their predictive values may help clinicians in their assessment of prognosis of patients when considering surgical treatment. In this study we examined the predictive value of eighteen preoperative factors in LSS with respect to good patient satisfaction with surgery and a good improvement of functional ability two years postoperatively. Material and methods The prospective study included 102 patients with clinically and radiologically defined LSS (9 10). Briefly, selection for surgery was made by the orthopaedist or neurosurgeon at Kuopio University Hospital between October 2001 and October The inclusion criteria were: 1) presence of back, buttock, and/or lower extremity pain, with radiographic evidence (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or rhizography) of compression of the cauda equina and/or exiting nerve roots due to degenerative changes (ligamentum flavum, facet joints, osteophytes and/or disc material) (11 13) and 2) the surgeon s judgement that the patient had clinically significant degenerative LSS as the main diagnosis indicative for operative treatment (11). In addition, all the patients had a history of ineffective responses to conservative treatment. A previous spine operation or co-existing disc herniation was permitted; however, LSS still had to be the main diagnosis for the operation. The exclusion criteria included emergency or urgent spinal operation precluding recruitment and protocol investigations; cognitive impairment prohibiting completion of the questionnaires or other failures in co-operation; and the presence of metallic particles in the body preventing the MRI investigation. The surgeons sent the information about patients eligible for the operation to the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (DPRM), which organised the study. The patients received an account of the study during their outpatient visit to the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and provided informed consent. The study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Kuopio and Kuopio University Hospital. Predictors Predictors were gathered from responses in the prospectively collected preoperative questionnaire unless otherwise stated. The patient-related predictors were age (years at operation), gender, body mass index (kg/m 2 ), smoking (0 = never, 1 = I have stopped smoking, 2 = yes, occasionally and 3 = yes, regularly); marital status (1 = married, 2 = cohabiting, 3 = single, 4 = widowed and 5 = divorced) and education (1 = secondary or higher degree examination, 0 = lower grade schooling). The self-rated health of the patients was assessed with the question How would you rate your health at present? (0 = good, 1 = quite good, 2 = average, 3 = quite poor and 4 = poor), modified from Katz et al. (14). Comorbidity affecting walking ability was assessed using preoperative medical charts of study visits, medical charts of surgeons and the Work Ability Index (WAI; patients reporting musculoskeletal diseases) (15) as a means to detect clear objective disability affecting walking performance, in addition to LSS. Five patients had symptomatic knee arthrosis, two had symptomatic hip arthrosis, one had both knee and hip-arthrosis and two had rheumatoid arthritis. The self-reported number of current or recurring diseases diagnosed by a physician, i.e. number of comorbidities, was assessed using the WAI (15). Diabetes (y/n; type 2) was classified separately from the WAI score. With respect to preoperative treatment, the question Have you performed self-acting back exercises? (yes/ no) was included. The frequency of analgesic use was assessed with the question Have you used analgesics during the last month? (0 = no, 1 = occasionally, 2 = about once a week, 3 = a few times a week, 4 = daily or almost daily and 5 = I use analgesics continually at the maximum doses). The duration of preoperative analgesic use was assessed with the question How long have you regularly used analgesics for your back problem or radiating pain to the lower extremities? (0 = no use of analgesics or under one month, 1 = 1 3 months, 2 = 3 6 months, 3 = 6 12 months and 4 = over one year). In-patient rehabilitation due to back problems and the preoperative use of a supportive belt during the previous year (0 = no, 1 = occasionally, 2 = about once a week, 3 = a few times a week, 4 = daily or almost daily) were evaluated. Previous lumbar operations were recorded retrospectively using medical charts. The predictors were dichotomised in order to use clinically oriented cut-off limits (Table 1A and 2A). With respect to age, 75 years was chosen as a cut-off (16). In order to calculate the body mass index (BMI), the height and weight were measured preoperatively. A BMI of 30 kg/m 2 is considered as the border between slight and moderate obesity (17). With respect to comorbidities, the mean split of the data was used. Concerning the duration of regular preoperative use of analgesics for back and/or leg pain (paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), codeine, tramadol, and/or anticonvulsants), all cut-offs (3, 6 and 12 months) were examined.

3 Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome 257 Outcome measures and the definition of a good outcome on two-year follow-up Satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using a seven-category scale as follows: 3 = surgery was a total failure, 2 = condition is now considerably worse, 1 = condition is now slightly worse, 0 = no change, 1 = condition has slightly improved, 2 = condition has considerably improved and 3 = totally cured. With respect to satisfaction, a good outcome consisted of those patients who were either totally cured or reported condition considerably improved, whereas a worse outcome consisted of the other responses (10). A good outcome in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0 100%) (18 19) was considered as a >30% improvement over the pre-surgery score ((postsurgery score presurgery score)/presurgery score) x 100%; modified from Mannion et al. (20)). Treatment before surgery Sixty-eight patients had been provided with self-acting back exercises (any source). For back and/or leg pain, 88 patients had used NSAIDs or paracetamol, 47 tramadol or codeine and 10 patients were prescribed anticonvulsants. Thirty-seven patients used analgesics daily or almost daily, and 24 patients reported continuous use at maximum doses. No strong opioids were used. Sixty patients had used analgesics regularly during the previous 12 months. Fortyfour patients had undergone in-patient rehabilitation due to their back problem. A supportive belt had been used by 25 patients during the previous 12 months, and 16 patients had undergone a prior lumbar operation. Surgical treatment The patients had (on average) severe symptoms due to LSS: preoperatively, the mean ODI was 43.9%, and leg pain on walking and back pain at rest (median; numeric rating scale 0 10; mean during previous week) were rated as 7 and 4, respectively. All the patients had open or microscopic decompressive surgery of the affected level(s), i.e. laminotomy, hemilaminectomy or laminectomy, with undercutting facetectomy due to lateral (n = 18) or both central and lateral (n = 84) LSS, with a mean dural sac area of 68.6 mm 2 at the most stenotic level. In addition to laminar decompression, disc excision was also performed in seven cases (one at level 2 3; one at level 3 4; four at level L4 5 and one at level L5 S1); LSS due other degenerative stenotic changes was also the main diagnosis in these patients. Lumbar fusion, two with instrumentation, was included in the decompression procedure in 19 cases. The indication for additional lumbar fusion was concomitant spondylolisthesis. Statistical analysis Univariate analysis (Pearson chi-squared) was applied to investigate the significance level for each predictor. Following univariate analysis, predictors with a significance level p < 0.1 were included in a binary logistic multivariate model to adjust for intervariable associations. Statistical significance was accepted at the p < 0.05 level, and significant predictors in the multivariate models were considered as the main results. All the patients (n = 102) were evaluated preoperatively. Drop-outs were excluded from the analysis (1 patient). To ensure maximum statistical power, the data from the latest follow-up of four patients who had died before the two-year follow-up were included in the analysis (representing 6 12-month postoperative follow-up data on these patients; data not shown). Thus, the data of 101 patients were finally analysed. Results Of the 102 patients, eighty-two (80%) were operated under the age of 75 years. There were 59 females and 43 males. BMI was under 30 in 46 (45%) patients. Twenty patients (20%) smoked either occasionally or regularly. Sixty-five patients (64%) were married or living with a partner. At least secondary-level education was reported in 39 (38%) patients. Self-rated health was good or quite good in 27 (26%) of the 102 patients before the operation. More than five comorbidities were reported by 55 patients (54%). Ten patients (10%) had a comorbidity affecting their walking ability, and eleven patients (11%) had type 2 diabetes. In 101 patients with follow-up data, good satisfaction with the surgical outcome was reported by 63.4% of the patients (Table 1A). The mean ODI improved from the preoperative level (43.9%) by 17.4 percentage points at the two-year follow-up (p < , t- test), and 62.4% achieved a good outcome in the improvement (> 30%) of disability (Table 2A). This corresponded to an 8 56 percentage point improvement in ODI scores in this study population. The distribution of the predictors (data not imputed) in the good and worse outcome study groups, and univariate analysis are presented in Table 1A (Satisfaction) and Table 2A (ODI). Multivariate models (Tables 1B and 2B) Predictors for good satisfaction were age < 75 years at operation (OR 4.03; 95% CI ; p = 0.012) and no previous lumbar operation (OR 3.65; 95% CI ; p = 0.031). Predictors for good improvement in the ODI were regular preoperative analgesic use < 12 months (OR 3.40; 95% CI ; p = 0.020), non-smoking (OR 3.47; 95% CI ; p = 0.035) and self-rated health above average (OR 3.27; 95% CI ; p = 0.039). The percentage of highly satisfied patients was 69.1% among the patient group < 75 years and 40.0% among the patient group 75 years. The respective percentages for a good improvement in the ODI were 55.0% and 64.2% (p = ns). The percentage of highly satisfied patients was 68.2% among patients without a previous lumbar operation and 37.5% among patients with a previous lumbar operation. The respective percentages for a good improvement in the ODI were 65.9% and 43.8% (p = ns). The percentage of patients reporting a good improvement in the ODI was 78.9% among the patient group regular preoperative analgesic use < 12 months and 52.5% for the group regular preoperative analgesic use 12 months. The respective percentages of highly satisfied patients were 76.3% and 57.6% (p = ns). The percentage of patients reporting a good improvement in the ODI was 67.5% among non-smokers and 45.0% among smokers. The respective percentages for highly satisfied patients were 66.3% and 55.0%

4 258 T. Aalto, S. Sinikallio, H. Kröger, et al. Table 1A Univariate analysis for satisfaction and appearance of preoperative predictors in the postoperative study groups according to the outcome. Predictors Satisfaction good outcome Worse outcome p-value (n = 64) (n = 37) (Pearson chi-squared) Patient-related predictors Age < 75 years 87.5% 67.6% *0.015* Male gender 37.5% 51.4% Body mass index < 30 kg/m % 43.2% Smoking (never or stopped) 82.8% 75.0% Married/cohabiting (yes) 68.8% 54.1% Education ( secondary school examination) 35.9% 43.2% Self-rated health and comorbidities Self-rated health (> average) 34.4% 14.3% *0.032* Number of comorbidities ( 5 (mean)) 59.4% 47.2% No comorbidity affecting walking ability 93.7% 83.8% Diabetes (type 2) 12.5% 05.6% Preoperative treatment Self-acting exercises (yes) 71.2% 73.5% Use of analgesics (a few times a week or less) 43.8% 35.4% Preop. analgesic use < 3 months 22.2% 14.7% Preop. analgesic use < 6 months 28.6% 20.6% Preop. analgesic use < 12 months 46.0% 26.5% *0.060* In-patient rehab. due to back problem (yes) 45.2% 45.5% Use of supportive belt (yes) 22.2% 31.4% No previous lumbar operation 90.6% 73.0% *0.019* * Predictors included in the multivariate model (p < 0.1). Table 2A Univariate analysis for the Oswestry Disability Index and appearance of predictors in the postoperative study groups according to the outcome. Preoperative predictors Oswestry Disability Index good outcome Worse outcome p-value (n = 63) (n = 38) (Pearson chi-squared) Patient-related predictors Age < 75 years 82.5% 76.3% Male gender 38.1% 50.0% Body mass index < 30 kg/m % 47.4% Smoking (never or stopped) 85.7% 70.3% *0.062* Married/cohabiting (yes) 66.7% 57.9% Education ( secondary school examination) 34.9% 44.7% Self-rated health and comorbidities Self-rated health (> average) 35.5% 13.5% *0.018* Number of comorbidities ( mean (5)) 59.7% 47.4% No comorbidity affecting walking ability 90.5% 89.5% Diabetes (type 2) 11.3% 7.9% Preoperative treatment Self-acting exercises (yes) 65.5% 82.9% *0.071* Use of analgesics (a few times a week or less) 46.8% 27.0% *0.052* Preop. analgesic use < 3 months 24.6% 11.1% Preop. analgesic use < 6 months 32.8% 13.9% *0.040* Preop. analgesic use < 12 months 49.2% 22.2% *0.009* In-patient rehab. due to back problem (yes) 44.3% 47.1% Use of supportive belt (yes) 22.6% 30.6% Previous lumbar operation (no) 88.9% 76.3% *0.094* * Predictors included in the multivariate model (p < 0.1). Table 1B Multivariate model: Predictors for good satisfaction with surgery ( total cure or condition has considerably improved ). Predictors OR (95% CI) p-value Age < 75 years 4.03 ( ) No previous lumbar operation 3.65 ( ) OR = Odds ratio. CI = Confidence interval. Table 2B Multivariate model: Predictors for good (> 30%) improvement of ODI. Predictors OR (95% CI) p-value Preop. analgesic use < 12months 3.40 ( ) Non-smoking/stopped previously 3.47 ( ) Self-rated health (> average) 3.27 ( ) OR = Odds ratio. CI = Confidence interval.

5 Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome 259 (p = ns). The percentage of patients reporting a good improvement in the ODI was 81.5% in the patient group SRH > average and 55.6% in the patient group SRH average. The respective percentages of highly satisfied patients were 81.5% and 58.3% (p = ns). Discussion In this prospective, observational study with a twoyear follow-up, the outcome was evaluated with two specific outcome measures in LSS surgery, i.e. patient satisfaction and the validated ODI score. The definition of a good outcome included at least a 30% relative improvement in the ODI, or patient satisfaction indicated by the reporting of totally cured or condition has considerably improved. We used rigorous categorisation of satisfaction with surgery in order to identify the patients who were truly satisfied with the results of the surgery. In addition, the predictors had clear cut-off values. As far as we know, this is the first time that a previous lumbar operation (PLO) has been demonstrated to have significant predictive value for worse satisfaction in a prospective study consisting of only LSS patients (5, 7). Of those 16 patients who had undergone a previous operation, 6 patients were truly satisfied ( condition has considerably improved or totally cured ), and of the 10 less satisfied patients, 9 reported condition has slightly improved and only one patient reported no change. Nevertheless, 15/16 patients had at least slight improvement, and thus patients with a prior operation still have a fair possibility of benefiting from an operation. An age of 75 years or over predicted worse patient satisfaction. However, increased age did not predict a worse outcome in the ODI. To optimise postoperative satisfaction in LSS, these results highlight the need for careful preoperative discussion concerning realistic expectations and the goal of the operation, particularly among elderly patients, and also with patients who have previously undergone a lumbar operation. These results are in line with the study of Jakola et al., in which a decompressive LSS operation was determined to be safe for patients aged over 70 years, and a clinically meaningful improvement in functional status and also the quality of life can be expected (21). Ishii et al (22) reported inferior results after cervical laminoplasty among patients 75 years or above, compared to younger age groups. We tested also other cut-offs (60, 65 and 70 years) which indicated however no predictive value. We thus recommend that the cut-off age of 75 years should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in further LSS studies. Smoking has been found to be a negative predictor for the outcome following lumbar disc herniation surgery (7), lumbar fusion (23 24), and also in the latest large register study (n = 4555) in LSS including the ODI and overall satisfaction as outcome measures, in which smokers also tended to use more analgesics before the operation and two years postoperatively (25). Our finding was that non-smoking individuals, including patients who have stopped smoking before surgery, have an odds ratio of over three for having a good functional improvement (ODI) following surgery. Our multivariate model also included the preoperative use of analgesics. As only three of the fused patients were smokers, the effect of nicotine on the revascularisation of the bone grafts (26) did not explain the poorer results for smokers in our population. Despite the ultimate mechanism of effect of tobacco, this study strengthens the belief that smoking also has a harmful effect among surgically treated LSS patients. Self-rated health (SRH) predicted a good improvement in the ODI score. In LSS surgery, better (excellent/good) SRH has been reported as a predictor of a better outcome (satisfaction, symptoms and walking ability) by Katz et al. (14). Instead of a four-item scale (excellent/good/fair/poor), we used a modified fivescale instrument, comparing patients with good or quite good SRH to the average/quite poor/poor SRH group. In the univariate analysis, an association with satisfaction was also noted (Table 1A). It has been suggested that the independent effect of selfassessed health might result from the respondents personal knowledge of current morbidity, incipient health problems, or other factors that influence the outcomes (27). For the first time in LSS, a clear cut-off value was found in the preoperative duration of regular analgesic use, i.e. analgesic use for 12 months or less predicted a good improvement in disability compared to patients with regular analgesic use of over 12 months. Our result is supported by the findings of Lawrence et al., according to which preoperative narcotic use for over six months on a daily basis predicted a worse outcome after cervical decompression and arthrodesis for radicular pain, with a minimum two-year followup (28). This finding may be useful when considering the timing of the operation. Longer preoperative symptoms have been reported to predict a worse outcome in lateral stenosis, but with no threshold value (29). We did not enquire about the duration of preoperative symptoms, but this duration of preoperative symptoms is likely to be longer than the duration of regular consumption of analgesics. Thus, regular consumption of analgesics may possibly be a better potential predictor, since it may reflect the presence of persistent and severe symptoms warranting operative decompression within a reasonable time window in order to prevent irreversible neural damage. However, before stronger recommendations for LSS treatment guidelines can be made, further studies are needed to confirm this 12-month time period. The regular preoperative consumption of analgesics in central stenosis has been reported to be associated with greater postoperative pain (29). The frequency of use of analgesics in our study remained at the non-significant level. Limitations Our study population was relatively small. We defined this study to present preoperative patient characteristics, preoperative treatment, self-rated health and comorbidities, excluding peroperative factors.

6 260 T. Aalto, S. Sinikallio, H. Kröger, et al. Some predictors had a low prevalence in this population (diabetes, comorbidity affecting walking ability), diminishing the statistical power when comparing these subgroups to the other subjects. It is therefore possible that some predictors in this study with nonsignificant results (predictive value) could have achieved a significant predictive value with a larger study population. With respect to the outcome measures, we only examined the predictors for good satisfaction with surgery and a good improvement in disability. These shortcomings, however, do not diminish the predictive value of the identified significant predictors in LSS. The present study may help clinicians in their assessment of the prognosis of patients when considering surgical treatment. However, prognostic studies are not designed to answer the question of what is the indication for surgery. Conclusion Regular analgesic use for 12 months or less preoperatively, better self-rated health (above average) and non-smoking predicted a good postoperative functional improvement. Age < 75 years and no previous lumbar operation both predicted good postoperative satisfaction with surgery. Acknowledgements We thank Vesa Kiviniemi for the statistical advice. This study was supported by a Kuopio University Hospital EVO grant and a research grant from the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Hulda Tossavainen Foundation 2003; Aili and Leo Davidsson Foundation 2009, St. Michel Central Hospital 200-year Fund 2010, and the Kaisu and Urho Kiukas Foundation 2011). References 01. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC et al: Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine 1994;19: Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M et al: Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007;32: Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al: Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358: Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al: Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 2010;35: Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F et al: Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 2006;31:E648 E Turner J, Ersek M, Herron L et al: Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 1992; 17: Mannion AF, Elfering A: Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 2006;1:S Mannion AF, Denzler R, Dvorak J et al: A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2007;16: Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O et al: Depression is associated with a poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year prospective follow-up study. Spine 2011;36: Sinikallio S, Aalto TJ, Airaksinen O et al: Lumbar spinal stenosis patients are satisfied with short-term results of surgery younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression decrease satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29: Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW et al: Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1995;20: Schönström NS, Bolender NF, Spengler DM: The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 1985;10: Spengler DM: Current concepts review: Degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A: Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH et al: Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1999;24: Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al: An approved version of the Work Disability Index. Occupational health series 19, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki Vitaz TW, Raque GH, Shields CB et al: Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients older than 75 years of age. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(2 Suppl): Mustajoki P, Kaukua J, Annanmäki L et al: Aikuisten lihavuus. Duodecim 2007;123: Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB: The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25: Grönblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P et al: Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 1993;9: Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D et al: Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change afterspinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2006;15: Jakola AS, Sorlie A, Gulati S et al: Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing Decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surg 2010;10: Ishii M, Wada E, Hamada M: Deterioration of surgical outcomes with aging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2012:17 (Epub ahead of print) 23. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Laursen M et al: Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spine fusion. Spine 2001;26: Glassman SD, Angnost SC, Parker A et al: The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine 2000;25: Sanden B, Forsth P, Michaelsson K: Smokers show less improvement than nonsmokers two years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 4555 patients from the Swedish spine register. Spine 2011;36: Daftari TK, Whitesides TE Jr, Heller JG et al: Nicotine on the revascularization of bone graft. An experimental study in rabbits. Spine 1994;19: Idler EL, Kasl S: Health perceptions and survival: do global evaluations of health status really predict mortality? J Gerontol 1991;46:S Lawrence JT, London N, Bohlman HH et al: Preoperative narcotic use as a predictor of clinical outcome: results following anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 2008;33: Jönsson B: Patient-related factors predicting the outcome of decompressive surgery. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1993;251:69 70 Received: October 6, 2011 Accepted: February 23, 2012

Lumbar Spinal Fusion Corporate Medical Policy

Lumbar Spinal Fusion Corporate Medical Policy Lumbar Spinal Fusion Corporate Medical Policy File name: Lumbar Spinal Fusion File code: UM.SURG.15 Origination: 09/01/2016 Last Review: 09/29/2016 Next Review: 09/29/2017 Effective Date: 01/01/2017 Populations

More information

Somatic comorbidity and younger age. associated with life dissatisfaction. among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment

Somatic comorbidity and younger age. associated with life dissatisfaction. among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment Eur Spine J (2007) 16: 857 864 DOI 10.1007/s00586-006-0080-5 REVIEW Sanna Sinikallio Timo Aalto Olavi Airaksinen Arto Herno Heikki Kro ger Sakari Savolainen Veli Turunen Heimo Viinamäki Somatic comorbidity

More information

EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN DISCECTOMY FOR IVDP A PROSPECTIVE STUDY Ranganath H.D 1, J.N. Sridhara Murthy 2, M. Prabu 3

EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN DISCECTOMY FOR IVDP A PROSPECTIVE STUDY Ranganath H.D 1, J.N. Sridhara Murthy 2, M. Prabu 3 EFFECTIVENESS OF OPEN DISCECTOMY FOR IVDP A PROSPECTIVE STUDY Ranganath H.D 1, J.N. Sridhara Murthy 2, M. Prabu 3 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Ranganath H.D, J.N. Sridhara Murthy, M. Prabu. Effectiveness

More information

Insert heading depending. cover options once. other cover options once you have chosen one. 20pt. Ref: N-SC/031

Insert heading depending. cover options once. other cover options once you have chosen one. 20pt. Ref: N-SC/031 Insert heading depending Insert Interim Insert heading Clinical Commissioning depending on line on on Policy: line length; length; please please delete delete on line line Spinal length; Surgery please

More information

North American Spine Society Public Education Series

North American Spine Society Public Education Series Herniated Lumbar Disc North American Spine Society Public Education Series What Is a Herniated Disc? The spine is made up of a series of connected bones called vertebrae. The disc is a combination of strong

More information

Japan is currently experiencing an unprecedented era of an. An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients

Japan is currently experiencing an unprecedented era of an. An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients ORIGINAL ARTICLE An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients Preliminary Experiences in 10 Consecutive Cases Jangbo Lee, MD*, Kazutoshi Hida, MD*, Toshitaka

More information

Cervical laminectomy for spinal cord compression. Information for patients Neurosurgery

Cervical laminectomy for spinal cord compression. Information for patients Neurosurgery Cervical laminectomy for spinal cord compression Information for patients Neurosurgery What is a compression of the spinal cord and how has it been caused? The bones in our back are called vertebras and

More information

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society Annals of Internal Medicine October 2007 Volume 147,

More information

OH, MY ACHING BACK STATISTICS COMMON CAUSES 2/13/2015

OH, MY ACHING BACK STATISTICS COMMON CAUSES 2/13/2015 OH, MY ACHING BACK FEBRUARY 2015 Cindy Anderson MSN, APRN, ACNP-BC, ANP-BC, CNRN Charleston Neurosurgical Associates STATISTICS 4 out 5 people have back pain Second most common painful condition Most common

More information

Physician Reference Manual

Physician Reference Manual Nucleotome Physician Reference Manual Automated Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy 900487-001-00, Page 1 Nucleotome Automated Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy (APLD) Table of Contents Section 1 I. Description

More information

Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery - incidence, risk factors and management

Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery - incidence, risk factors and management 20 Adam et al Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery - incidence, risk factors and management D. Adam 1,3, T. Papacocea 2,3, R. Iliescu 3, I. Hornea 3,

More information

Ten Second Step Test" as a New Quantifiable Parameter of Cervical Myelopathy. Spine January 1, 2009; Volume 34; Issue 1; pp 82-86

Ten Second Step Test as a New Quantifiable Parameter of Cervical Myelopathy. Spine January 1, 2009; Volume 34; Issue 1; pp 82-86 Ten Second Step Test" as a New Quantifiable Parameter of Cervical Myelopathy 1 Spine January 1, 2009; Volume 34; Issue 1; pp 82-86 Yukawa, Yasutsugu; Kato, Fumihiko; Ito, Keigo; Horie, Yumiko; Nakashima,

More information

Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI

Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI Acta Neurochir (2016) 158:981 988 DOI 10.1007/s00701-016-2777-5 CLINICAL ARTICLE - SPINE Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early

More information

Rick C. Sasso MD Professor Chief of Spine Surgery Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine

Rick C. Sasso MD Professor Chief of Spine Surgery Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Cervical Myelopathy: Anterior Surgery is Best Rick C. Sasso MD Professor Chief of Surgery Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery University School of Medicine Disclosure: Research support-medtronic, Stryker, AO,

More information

NICE guideline Published: 30 November 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59

NICE guideline Published: 30 November 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59 Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management NICE guideline Published: 30 November 2016 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59 NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).

More information

Since cervical laminoplasty was developed in Japan

Since cervical laminoplasty was developed in Japan WScJ 4: 88-94, 2013 Combined Expansive Laminoplasty and Foraminotomy for Cervical Myeloradiculopathy, a Prospective Study Ahmed Elbadrawi Department of Orthopedics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Abstract

More information

Low Back Pain Advanced Pain Management

Low Back Pain Advanced Pain Management Low Back Pain Advanced Pain Management Yashar Eshraghi, MD Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care University of California, Irvine Disclosure None 2 Department Name Month X, 201X Objectives

More information

Identification of a Novel Common Genetic Risk Factor for Lumbar Disk Disease Original Contribution JAMA, Vol. 285 No. 14: , April 11, 2001

Identification of a Novel Common Genetic Risk Factor for Lumbar Disk Disease Original Contribution JAMA, Vol. 285 No. 14: , April 11, 2001 1 Identification of a Novel Common Genetic Risk Factor for Lumbar Disk Disease Original Contribution JAMA, Vol. 285 No. 14:1843-1849, April 11, 2001 Petteri Paassilta; Jaana Lohiniva; Harald H. H. Göring;

More information

Spinal Fusion. North American Spine Society Public Education Series

Spinal Fusion. North American Spine Society Public Education Series Spinal Fusion North American Spine Society Public Education Series What Is Spinal Fusion? The spine is made up of a series of bones called vertebrae ; between each vertebra are strong connective tissues

More information

Correlation between Clinical Features and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Discopathy

Correlation between Clinical Features and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Discopathy Original research Correlation between Clinical Features and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Lumbar Mohammad Sobhanardekani1, Mohammad Reza Sobhan2, Seyed Mohammad Jalil Abrisham2, Majid Samiee1,

More information

Spine Tango, utility and results from real life. Emin Aghayev Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine University of Bern

Spine Tango, utility and results from real life. Emin Aghayev Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine University of Bern Spine Tango, utility and results from real life Emin Aghayev Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine University of Bern Table of content What is Spine Tango History and key figures Why do we need

More information

IJPHY AN INTEGRATED EXERCISE APPROACH FOR SECONDARY LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS- A CASE REPORT ABSTRACT

IJPHY AN INTEGRATED EXERCISE APPROACH FOR SECONDARY LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS- A CASE REPORT ABSTRACT Int J Physiother. Vol 4(4), 201-206, August (2017) ISSN: 2348-8336 ORIGINAL ARTICLE IJPHY ABSTRACT AN INTEGRATED EXERCISE APPROACH FOR SECONDARY LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS- A CASE REPORT *1 Saurabh Kumar ²Narkeesh

More information

A Patient s Guide to Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

A Patient s Guide to Adult Degenerative Scoliosis A Patient s Guide to Adult Degenerative Scoliosis 6565 Fannin Street Houston, TX 77030 Phone: 713-790-3333 DISCLAIMER: The information in this booklet is compiled from a variety of sources. It may not

More information

MRI Measurement of Neuroforaminal Dimension at the Index and Supradjacent Levels after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study

MRI Measurement of Neuroforaminal Dimension at the Index and Supradjacent Levels after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Study Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2013;5:49-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.49 MRI Measurement of Neuroforaminal Dimension at the Index and Supradjacent Levels after Anterior Lumbar

More information

Fusion and repeat discectomy following single level open lumbar discectomies. Survival analysis

Fusion and repeat discectomy following single level open lumbar discectomies. Survival analysis Fusion and repeat discectomy following single level open lumbar discectomies. Survival analysis Dr John Mortimer Mr Chris Hoffman CCDHB and TBI Health group Sciatica = Leg Dominant Pain Patients referred

More information

Spine Postoperative Infections: Risk Factors

Spine Postoperative Infections: Risk Factors Spine Postoperative Infections: Risk Factors Tomás Funes 1, 2 MD, Donato Pacione1 MD, Stephen Kalhorn 1 MD, Pablo Jalón 2 MD, Anthony Frempong-Boadu1 MD, Juan José Mezzadri 2 MD, PhD 1 Department of Neurosurgery,

More information

Changes in Spinal Canal Diameter and Vertebral Body Height with Age

Changes in Spinal Canal Diameter and Vertebral Body Height with Age Original Article http://dx.doi.org/1.3349/ymj.213.54.6.1498 pissn: 513-5796, eissn: 1976-2437 Yonsei Med J 54(6):1498-154, 213 Changes in Spinal Canal Diameter and Vertebral Body Height with Age Kyung

More information

Lumbar radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis in rheumatoid arthritis

Lumbar radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis in rheumatoid arthritis Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011; 116: 133 137 ORIGINL RTICLE Lumbar radiculopathy caused by foraminal stenosis in rheumatoid arthritis TOMOKI KOKUTSU, NOKI MOROZUMI, YUTK KOIZUMI & YUSHIN ISHII

More information

SPINA BIFIDA OCCULTA WITH ENGAGEMENT OF THE FIFTH LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS. A Cause of Low Back Pain and Sciatica

SPINA BIFIDA OCCULTA WITH ENGAGEMENT OF THE FIFTH LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS. A Cause of Low Back Pain and Sciatica SPINA BIFIDA OCCULTA WITH ENGAGEMENT OF THE FIFTH LUMBAR SPINOUS PROCESS A Cause of Low Back Pain and Sciatica CARLOS E. DE ANQUIN, CORDOBA, ARGENTINA Fro,n the Orthopaedic Department, Military Hospital,

More information

PRP and Stem cells Injection : Its applications in discopathy

PRP and Stem cells Injection : Its applications in discopathy PRP and Stem cells Injection : Its applications in discopathy Congrès conjoint AQMSE-ACMSE meeting 2017 Dr André Roy Chef service de physiatrie du CHUM Clinique de physiatrie et de médecine du sport de

More information

Clinical guideline Published: 12 February 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177

Clinical guideline Published: 12 February 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177 Osteoarthritis: care and management Clinical guideline Published: 12 February 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177 NICE 2017. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).

More information

Abstract Study Design Systematic review.

Abstract Study Design Systematic review. 436 Review Article GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL THIEME The Relationship between Preoperative Expectations and the Short-Term Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic

More information

LONG-TERM EFFECT ANALYSIS OF IDD THERAPY IN LOW BACK PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL PILOT STUDY

LONG-TERM EFFECT ANALYSIS OF IDD THERAPY IN LOW BACK PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL PILOT STUDY Preliminary Findings LONG-TERM EFFECT ANALYSIS OF IDD THERAPY IN LOW BACK PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL PILOT STUDY C. Norman Shealy, MD, PhD, Nirman Koladia, MD, and Merrill M. Wesemann, MD Abstract.

More information

Humber NHS Foundation Trust. Joint Effort

Humber NHS Foundation Trust. Joint Effort Joint Joint is a new community based musculoskeletal service that treats patients with complex problems of the spine, upper and lower limb. Joint s experienced Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons and Extended

More information

Disclosures. The Value Agenda in Spine Care Steven D. Glassman, M.D. 10/14/16. AllinaHealthSystems 1. Introduction. Introduction.

Disclosures. The Value Agenda in Spine Care Steven D. Glassman, M.D. 10/14/16. AllinaHealthSystems 1. Introduction. Introduction. The Value Agenda in Spine Care Steven D. Glassman, M.D. Professor of Orthopedic Surgery University of Louisville Norton Leatherman Spine Center Past-President, Scoliosis Research Society Medtronic Disclosures

More information

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement. A Patient s Guide

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement. A Patient s Guide Lumbar Total Disc Replacement A Patient s Guide Your Life In Motion Your life is in constant motion. It s always moving forward, never backward. That s why setbacks to your health can be so devastating.

More information

RESEARCH HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS

RESEARCH HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS RESEARCH HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS RESEARCH HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS David W. Polly, MD* Daniel J. Cher, MD Kathryn D. Wine, MPH Peter G. Whang, MD Clay J. Frank, MD Charles F. Harvey, MDk Harry Lockstadt, MD#

More information

The Complex/Challenging Spine Patient Steve Wisniewski, M.D. Department of PM&R

The Complex/Challenging Spine Patient Steve Wisniewski, M.D. Department of PM&R The Complex/Challenging Spine Patient Steve Wisniewski, M.D. Department of PM&R 2011 MFMER slide-1 Disclosures None 2011 MFMER slide-2 Learning Objectives Review indications for obtaining imaging studies

More information

Anatomy of the Spine. Figure 1. (left) The spine has three natural curves that form an S-shape; strong muscles keep our spine in alignment.

Anatomy of the Spine. Figure 1. (left) The spine has three natural curves that form an S-shape; strong muscles keep our spine in alignment. 1 2 Anatomy of the Spine Overview The spine is made of 33 individual bony vertebrae stacked one on top of the other. This spinal column provides the main support for your body, allowing you to stand upright,

More information

A. Clinical Studies Group: Orthopaedic Surgery

A. Clinical Studies Group: Orthopaedic Surgery A. Clinical Studies Group: Orthopaedic Surgery Chair: Professor Damian Griffin Disease/disorder covered: Orthopaedic Surgery This research strategy maps out the direction for orthopaedic clinical research.

More information

Single Level Anterior cervical discectomy

Single Level Anterior cervical discectomy National Hospital National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Single Level Anterior cervical discectomy Spinal Neurosurgery Information for patients Contents Introduction 4 What do you need to do

More information

Unanswered Questions. Laminoplasty is best

Unanswered Questions. Laminoplasty is best Laminoplasty is best Wellington K. Hsu, MD Clifford C. Raisbeck Distinguished Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Director of Research Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Northwestern University Feinberg School

More information

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research  ISSN: International Journal of Health Sciences and Research www.ijhsr.org ISSN: 2249-9571 Original Research Article Effects of Four Different Hold and Rest Time Combinations of Intermittent Lumbar Traction in

More information

Accelerated return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and early knee osteoarthritis features at one year

Accelerated return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and early knee osteoarthritis features at one year Accelerated return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and early knee osteoarthritis features at one year CULVENOR AG, PATTERSON BE, GUERMAZI A, MORRIS HG, WHITEHEAD TS, CROSSLEY KM

More information

Intraspinal lumbar juxtaarticular cyst treatment through CT-guided percutaneus induced rupture results in a favorable patient outcome

Intraspinal lumbar juxtaarticular cyst treatment through CT-guided percutaneus induced rupture results in a favorable patient outcome Intraspinal lumbar juxtaarticular cyst treatment through CT-guided percutaneus induced rupture results in a favorable patient outcome Adisa Kursumovic, 1 Richard Bostelmann, 2 Maria Gollwitzer, 1 Stefan

More information

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Painful Spinal Tumors. Thoracolumbar Tumors. Differential Diagnosis: Imposters 6/1/2013.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Painful Spinal Tumors. Thoracolumbar Tumors. Differential Diagnosis: Imposters 6/1/2013. Minimally Invasive Treatment of Painful Spinal Tumors Praveen V. Mummaneni, M.D. Professor Vice-Chairman Dept. of Neurosurgery Co-Director: UCSF Spine Center University of California, San Francisco Presenter:

More information

TRATTAMENTO DELLE ERNIE DEL DISCO DORSALI Quadri clinici e indicazioni alla chirurgia

TRATTAMENTO DELLE ERNIE DEL DISCO DORSALI Quadri clinici e indicazioni alla chirurgia TRATTAMENTO DELLE ERNIE DEL DISCO DORSALI Quadri clinici e indicazioni alla chirurgia A Delitala U.O.C.Neurochirurgia Az Osp S Camillo-Forlanini, Rome Very low incidence: less than 1% of all herniated

More information

Review Article Operative Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Cervical Laminoplasty

Review Article Operative Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Cervical Laminoplasty Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Orthopedics Volume 2012, Article ID 508534, 5 pages doi:10.1155/2012/508534 Review Article Operative Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Cervical Laminoplasty Brett

More information

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY SPINE FELLOWSHIP CORE CURRICULUM

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY SPINE FELLOWSHIP CORE CURRICULUM AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY SPINE FELLOWSHIP CORE CURRICULUM Introduction Spine conditions affect virtually everyone at some time during their life. Surveys indicate a yearly prevalence of spine-related

More information

PEEK-OPTIMA Spinal Rods: A Retrospective Clinical Study

PEEK-OPTIMA Spinal Rods: A Retrospective Clinical Study Spinal Rods: A Retrospective Clinical Study Abstract When treating degenerative lumbar spinal disease, a posterior pedicle screw construct with rigid (metal) rods are usually selected. However drawbacks

More information

Jefferson and Hangman fractures

Jefferson and Hangman fractures Jefferson and Hangman fractures Roberto Delfini Alessandro Landi Department of Neurosurgery Isolated fractures of the Atlas A-Jefferson Fracture B-Comminuted lateral mass fracture C-Unilateral Ring Fracture

More information

Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 229 235 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

More information

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Protocol This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. Protocol for: Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, et al. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy

More information

A rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint

A rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint J Orthop Sci (2012) 17:189 193 DOI 10.1007/s00776-011-0082-y CASE REPORT A rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint Kei Shinohara Shigeru Soshi

More information

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Universitas Sumatera Utara DAFTAR PUSTAKA 1. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine.2005;30(6):682-688. 2. Glassman SD, Bridwell

More information

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript N Engl J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 September 26.

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript N Engl J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 September 26. NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31; 356(22): 2257 2270. doi:10.1056/nejmoa070302. Surgical versus Nonsurgical for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

More information

Depression among elderly attending geriatric clubs in Assiut City, Egypt

Depression among elderly attending geriatric clubs in Assiut City, Egypt Depression among elderly attending geriatric clubs in Assiut City, Egypt Eman M. Mohamed *1, Mohamed A Abd-Elhamed 2 1 Public Health and Community Medicine Dept., Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University

More information

Keyhole Approach for Posterior Cervical Discectomy: Experience on 84 Patients

Keyhole Approach for Posterior Cervical Discectomy: Experience on 84 Patients Original Article 7 Keyhole Approach for Posterior Cervical Discectomy: Experience on 84 Patients Author Y. Ş. Ça ǧ lar1, M. Bozkurt 1, G. Kahilogullari 1, H. Tu na 1, A. Bakir 2, F. To r u n 1, H. C. U

More information

One hospitalization with any of the defining diagnoses of spondylosis (see ICD9 and ICD10 code lists below) in any diagnostic position; or

One hospitalization with any of the defining diagnoses of spondylosis (see ICD9 and ICD10 code lists below) in any diagnostic position; or 1 ORTHO 16 SPONDYLOSIS Includes spondylopathies due to asymptomatic and symptomatic degenerative changes of the bony spine (M47 and M48); Does not include ankylosing spondylitis (M45), other inflammatory

More information

Chapter 3 Diagnostic Imaging. 1 Diagnostic Imaging

Chapter 3 Diagnostic Imaging. 1 Diagnostic Imaging Chapter 3 Diagnostic Imaging 1 Diagnostic Imaging Radiographic Examination: Standards and Indications Position Statement Radiography should only be performed on the basis of clinical necessity as judged

More information

THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN. Dr. Nabil Khouri MD, MSc, Ph.D

THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN. Dr. Nabil Khouri MD, MSc, Ph.D THE VERTEBRAL COLUMN Dr. Nabil Khouri MD, MSc, Ph.D Vertebral column 33 Vertebrae Inter-vertebral disc Form 1/4 of its length 7 12 5 5 4 Vertebra Column Distributed as follows 1. 7 cervical vertebrae neck

More information

Outcome of Girdlestone s resection arthroplasty following complications of proximal femoral fractures

Outcome of Girdlestone s resection arthroplasty following complications of proximal femoral fractures Acta Orthop. Belg., 2006, 72, 555-559 ORIGINAL STUDY Outcome of Girdlestone s resection arthroplasty following complications of proximal femoral fractures Himanshu SHARMA, Rahul KAKAR From the Royal Alexandra

More information

A/Prof Mel Cusi.

A/Prof Mel Cusi. www.orthosports.com.au 47-49 Burwood Road, Concord 29-31 Dora Street, Hurstville 119-121 Lethbridge Street, Penrith 160 Belmore Road, Randwick My approach to a patient with low back pain MBBS, FACSEP,

More information

Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in an Active Duty Military Population

Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in an Active Duty Military Population Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in an Active Duty Military Population Daniel G. Kang, MD 1 ; Ronald A. Lehman, Jr., MD 1,2 ; Robert W. Tracey, MD 1 ; John P. Cody, MD 1 ; Michael K. Rosner,

More information

Disclosures. Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Pain. Modified Triplanar Fluoroscopic Approach in Percutaneous Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint 5/12/2017

Disclosures. Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Pain. Modified Triplanar Fluoroscopic Approach in Percutaneous Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint 5/12/2017 Modified Triplanar Fluoroscopic Approach in Percutaneous Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint J.E. Barrett, M.D. Atlanta Medical Center Atlanta Trauma Symposium 22 April 2017 Disclosures None Sacroiliac Joint

More information

Title:Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery

Title:Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery Author's response to reviews Title:Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery Authors: Eugen Lungu (eugen.lungu@umontreal.ca) François Desmeules

More information

Paraspinal muscle changes of unilateral multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion

Paraspinal muscle changes of unilateral multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion Yoo et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2014, 9:130 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Paraspinal muscle changes of unilateral multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion Jae-Sung

More information

ROME SPINE 2012 VII Annual Congress

ROME SPINE 2012 VII Annual Congress International Conference PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME CALL FOR ABSTRACTS ROME SPINE 2012 VII Annual Congress President F. Postacchini Co President P.P.M. Menchetti Rome 6-7 december 2012 Crowne Plaza St. Pater

More information

Prevalence of Epidural Lipomatosis: Our Experience at a University Based Pain Clinic

Prevalence of Epidural Lipomatosis: Our Experience at a University Based Pain Clinic SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES Prevalence of Epidural Lipomatosis: Our Experience at a University Based Pain Clinic Shushovan Chakrabortty 1, David H. Rustom 2, Deepak Gupta 1 and Conor Zuk 3** ABSTRACT Background:

More information

International Postprofessional Doctoral of Physical Therapy (DPT) in Musculoskeletal Management Program (non US/Canada) Curriculum

International Postprofessional Doctoral of Physical Therapy (DPT) in Musculoskeletal Management Program (non US/Canada) Curriculum International Postprofessional Doctoral of Physical Therapy (DPT) in Musculoskeletal Management Program (non US/Canada) Curriculum Effective: July 2015 INTERNATIONAL POSTPROFESSIONAL DOCTORAL OF PHYSICAL

More information

The prevalence and history of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a case control study

The prevalence and history of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a case control study The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh700 Family Practice Advance Access

More information

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Technology Overview

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Technology Overview Cervical Disc Arthroplasty A Technology Overview ADOPTED BY THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS BOARD OF DIRECTORS March 8, 2010 This Technology Overview was prepared using systematic review methodology,

More information

SKELETAL STRUCTURES Objectives for Exam #1: Objective for Portfolio #1: Part I: Skeletal Stations Station A: Bones of the Body

SKELETAL STRUCTURES Objectives for Exam #1: Objective for Portfolio #1: Part I: Skeletal Stations Station A: Bones of the Body SKELETAL STRUCTURES Objectives for Exam #1: 1. Provide information on the various structures and functions of the skeletal system. 2. Describe various skeletal system disorders, including imaging techniques

More information

Graft and fusion. The specifications of the roi implant aim at satisfying the requirements of lumbar intersomatic arthrodesis.

Graft and fusion. The specifications of the roi implant aim at satisfying the requirements of lumbar intersomatic arthrodesis. Patented system New exclusive LDR Medical concept Graft and fusion The specifications of the roi implant aim at satisfying the requirements of lumbar intersomatic arthrodesis. Roi intersomatic cages were

More information

FOOT AND ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY

FOOT AND ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY FOOT AND ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY Information for Patients WHAT IS FOOT AND ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY? The foot and the ankle are crucial for human movement. The balanced action of many bones, joints, muscles and tendons

More information

Stress Fatigue and Ergonomics in Dentistry

Stress Fatigue and Ergonomics in Dentistry J. Ecophysiol. Occup. Hlth. 11 (2011) 47-51 2011 The Academy of Environmental Biology, India Stress Fatigue and Ergonomics in Dentistry Yogesh Upadhyay, Ramesh Chandra 1, Shipra Shukla 1 and Sultana Sarwar

More information

Large C5 6 Left Paracentral Disc Herniation with Cord Impingement Treated Conservatively with Cox Cervical Flexion Distraction Decompression Technic

Large C5 6 Left Paracentral Disc Herniation with Cord Impingement Treated Conservatively with Cox Cervical Flexion Distraction Decompression Technic Cox Technic Case Report #159 published at www.coxtechnic.com (sent 7/12/16) 1 Large C5 6 Left Paracentral Disc Herniation with Cord Impingement Treated Conservatively with Cox Cervical Flexion Distraction

More information

Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients

Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2017;9:310-316 https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310 Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective

More information

Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement

Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement NASS COVERAGE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement DEFINING APPROPRIATE COVERAGE POSITIONS North American Spine Society 7075 Veterans Blvd. Burr Ridge, IL 60527 TASKFORCE Introduction

More information

Manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: epidural pannus and atlantoaxial subluxation resulting in basilar invagination.

Manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: epidural pannus and atlantoaxial subluxation resulting in basilar invagination. Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Faculty Papers Department of Rehabilitation Medicine 1-1-2012 Manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: epidural

More information

Screening for Osteoporosis in Men Aged 70 Years and Older in a Primary Care Setting in the United States

Screening for Osteoporosis in Men Aged 70 Years and Older in a Primary Care Setting in the United States 478826JMHXXX10.1177/1557988313478826 American Journal of Men s HealthLim et al. Article Screening for Osteoporosis in Men Aged 70 Years and Older in a Primary Care Setting in the United States American

More information

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition Case Report 662 Idiopathic Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis Two Cases Report and Review of Literature Jun-Yeen Chan, MD; Chih-Ju Chang, MD, MS; Chin-Ming Jeng 1, MD; Shih-Hung Huang 2, MD; Yuan-Kai Liu, MD;

More information

Chiropractic Healthcare

Chiropractic Healthcare ebook 3 Chiropractic Healthcare Sciatica - Sleep Back Pain Prevention Chapter 1 3 My Doctor Told Me I Have Sciatica Chapter 2 7 Sciatica & Low Back Pain Prevention Chapter 3 12 Proper Sleeping Positions

More information

Intervertebral Disc Disease A Major Pain in the Neck or Back

Intervertebral Disc Disease A Major Pain in the Neck or Back Intervertebral Disc Disease A Major Pain in the Neck or Back Dogs, like people, can be afflicted with problems of the spinal column. One of the most common issues with this part of the body is an abnormality

More information

Construction of Aged Patient Spine Database with Degenerative Diseases

Construction of Aged Patient Spine Database with Degenerative Diseases Construction of Aged Patient Spine Database with Degenerative Diseases Seungwoo Lee 1, Dongmin Seo 1, Soon-Chan Hong 1, Sang-Ho Lee 1, Hanmin Jung 1 1 Information and S/W Research Center, Korea Institute

More information

Loss of intervertebral disc height, cervical extension, Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area

Loss of intervertebral disc height, cervical extension, Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area J Neurosurg Spine 20:178 182, 2014 AANS, 2014 Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area Laboratory investigation Lee A. Tan, M.D., 1 Carter S. Gerard, M.D.,

More information

Functional Anatomy and Exam of the Lumbar Spine. Thomas Hunkele MPT, ATC, NASM-PES,CES Coordinator of Rehabilitation

Functional Anatomy and Exam of the Lumbar Spine. Thomas Hunkele MPT, ATC, NASM-PES,CES Coordinator of Rehabilitation Functional Anatomy and Exam of the Lumbar Spine Thomas Hunkele MPT, ATC, NASM-PES,CES Coordinator of Rehabilitation Disclosure Anatomical Review Quick Review of Bony and Ligamentous structures Discal anatomy

More information

GUIDELINES FOR PATIENTS HAVING CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERY

GUIDELINES FOR PATIENTS HAVING CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERY ORTHOPAEDIC UNIT: 01-293 8687 /01-293 6602 UPMC BEACON CENTRE FOR ORTHOPAEDICS: 01-2937575 PHYSIOTHERAPY DEPARTMENT: 01-2936692 GUIDELINES FOR PATIENTS HAVING CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERY Please

More information

Percutaneous treatment of lumbar disc herniation with gelified ethanol/ a preliminary study

Percutaneous treatment of lumbar disc herniation with gelified ethanol/ a preliminary study Percutaneous treatment of lumbar disc herniation with gelified ethanol/ a preliminary study Poster No.: C-0223 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Authors: Keywords: DOI: Scientific Exhibit M. Runge; Besançon/FR

More information

Trent Haywood, MD, JD Chief Medical Officer Blue Cross Blue Shield Association 225 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60601

Trent Haywood, MD, JD Chief Medical Officer Blue Cross Blue Shield Association 225 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, IL 60601 2016-2017 ISASS BOARD OF DIRECTORS February 20, 2017 President Hee Kit Wong, MD, Singapore Treasurer Jeffrey Goldstein, MD, USA Michael Ogon, MD, PhD, Austria Marek Szpalski, MD Belgium Jack Zigler, MD,

More information

Audit on follow-up of patients with primary Osteoporosis

Audit on follow-up of patients with primary Osteoporosis Abstract Aim: To document the frequency of Dual-energy X- ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning and Rheumatology clinic follow-up visits of patients with primary osteoporosis, and compare these with recommended

More information

Effect of Post-Operative Ketorolac Administration on Bone Healing in Ankle Fractures

Effect of Post-Operative Ketorolac Administration on Bone Healing in Ankle Fractures Effect of Post-Operative Ketorolac Administration on Bone Healing in Ankle Fractures Elizabeth McDonald, BA Brian Winters, MD Rachel Shakked, MD David I. Pedowitz, MD Steven M. Raikin, MD Joseph N. Daniel,

More information

Society (SRS) Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity

Society (SRS) Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity The SRS Classification for Adult Spinal Deformity Building on the King/Moe and Lenke Classification Systems Thomas Lowe, MD,* Sigurd H. Berven, MD, Frank J. Schwab, MD, and Keith H. Bridwell, MD SPINE

More information

UK Liver Transplant Audit

UK Liver Transplant Audit November 2012 UK Liver Transplant Audit In patients who received a Liver Transplant between 1 st March 1994 and 31 st March 2012 ANNUAL REPORT Advisory Group for National Specialised Services Prepared

More information

Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain

Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain Low-back pain is a common condition that can be difficult to treat. Spinal manipulation is among the treatment options used by people with low-back pain in attempts

More information

The relations between social support, life stress, and quality of Life following spinal decompression surgery

The relations between social support, life stress, and quality of Life following spinal decompression surgery (2003) 41, 553 558 & 2003 International Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/sc Original Article The relations between social support, life stress, and quality of Life following

More information

Lumbar Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: Prevalence and Patterns Abstract: Keywords: Introduction II. Materials And Methods

Lumbar Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: Prevalence and Patterns Abstract: Keywords: Introduction II. Materials And Methods IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-issn: 2279-0853, p-issn: 2279-0861.Volume 15, Issue 10 Ver. VII (October. 2016), PP 27-32 www.iosrjournals.org Lumbar Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis:

More information

ORIGINAL PAPER. Marginal pulmonary function is associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes in lung cancer surgery

ORIGINAL PAPER. Marginal pulmonary function is associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes in lung cancer surgery Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 79. 37 ~ 42, 2017 doi:10.18999/nagjms.79.1.37 ORIGINAL PAPER Marginal pulmonary function is associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes in lung cancer surgery Naoki Ozeki, Koji

More information

GUIDELINE FOR RECOVERY ROOM MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY

GUIDELINE FOR RECOVERY ROOM MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY GUIDELINE FOR RECOVERY ROOM MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY Full Title of Guideline: Author (include email and role): Guideline for Recovery Room Management of Patients after Carotid

More information