(b) (6) January 21, Copy Hand Delivered & Original Sent via Federal Express
|
|
- Eugene Banks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United States Food Safety Boulder District Office of Field Operations Department of and Inspection 665 South Broadway, Suite B. Agriculture Service Boulder, Colorado (b) (6) Foster Poultry Farms; Est. P-6164A 1700 South 13 th Avenue Kelso, Washington January 21, 2005 Copy Hand Delivered & Original Sent via Federal Express NOTICE OF INTENDED ENFORCEMENT This serves as official notification by the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of our intent to withhold the marks of inspection and suspend the assignment of FSIS inspection program personnel at Foster Poultry Farms, Establishment P-6164A, 1700 South 13 th Avenue; Kelso, Washington. Background and Authority: The Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.) provide that it is essential in the public interest that the health and welfare of consumers be protected by assuring that meat and poultry products distributed to them are wholesome, not adulterated, and properly marked, labeled, and packaged. These Acts give FSIS the authority, as designated by the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, to prescribe rules and regulations describing sanitation requirements for inspected establishments. They also provide FSIS program personnel the authority to refuse to allow meat or meat food products, or poultry products, to be labeled, marked, stamped, or tagged as inspected and passed and to prevent the entry of products into commerce when the sanitary conditions of any such establishment are such that products are adulterated and provide definitions for the term adulterated. Furthermore, the Acts provide FSIS the authority to appoint inspectors from time to time to examine and inspect products, including the sanitary conditions of facilities. They also give FSIS program personnel the right to examine and inspect all carcasses and parts of carcasses that are further treated and prepared and the right to access and examine and copy establishment records. When the sanitary conditions of a facility are not properly maintained, FSIS can refuse to render inspection and indefinitely withdraw inspection from an establishment provided the establishment is afforded the right to an administrative hearing. Under the authorities of the Act, FSIS has prescribed rules and regulations required for establishments producing meat and poultry products, including the requirements pertaining to Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOP) and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) (9 CFR Parts 416 and Part 417) and other matters. FSIS has also developed Rules of Practice regarding enforcement (9 CFR Part 500). FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
2 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 2 The Rules of Practice describe the types of enforcement action that FSIS may take and include procedures for withholding the marks of inspection and/or suspending the assignment of inspectors, with or without prior notification, and for filing a complaint to withdraw a grant of Federal inspection. Findings and Basis for the Action: On December 27, 2004, a comprehensive Food Safety Assessment (FSA) was initiated regarding the food safety systems at Establishment P-6164A. The assessment was initiated after receiving information that numerous Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg illnesses occurred in Washington, Oregon, and other states during the summer and fall of 2004, and because some of the persons who became ill reported to have consumed chicken produced by Establishment P- 6164A. On December 15, 2004, shortly before the FSA began, FSIS notified the establishment that results of FSIS Salmonella testing ongoing in the plant since November 2004, indicated that the establishment was likely to fail the sample set. The FSA team members were Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs), (b) (7)(C), and Dr. James Adams, Deputy District Manager of the Boulder District Office. The findings are presented below in six different categories: 1) S. Heidelberg illnesses Associated with Est. P-6164A Product, 2) Positive Salmonella Analyses of Est. P-6164A Product, 3) Failure to Comply with HACCP Regulatory Requirements (9 CFR Part 417), 4) Failure to Comply with Sanitation Performance Standards (SPS) Regulatory Requirements (9 CFR Part to 416.5), 5) Failure to Comply with Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs) (9 CFR Part to ), and 6) Failure to Comply with Poultry Products Inspection Regulatory Requirements (9 CFR Part 381). The findings demonstrate that poultry product at Est. P-6164A has been prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health, as defined in Section (g)(4) of the Poultry Products Inspection Act. The findings are the basis for this Notice of Intended Enforcement. 1) S. Heidelberg Illnesses Associated with Est. P-6164A Product On December 9, 2004, the Washington state epidemiologist notified the Foodborne Disease Investigations Branch, HHSD, OPHS, FSIS, of a Salmonella Heidelberg outbreak following a November 20 th, 2004 party. There were four (4) culture-confirmed cases of Salmonella Heidelberg infections and three (3) probable cases, with all 7 illnesses possibly related to chicken purchased from P- 6164A and consumed at the party. The Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern for the four (4) confirmed illnesses was JF6X This was a new pattern to the PulseNet database; since this was a new/rare pattern the second enzyme digest was not needed for identification or discrimination. The Washington state laboratory tested for Salmonella an unused intact sample of chicken associated with the party purchase. The Washington State laboratory reported that Salmonella species were found, however, they were unable to determine the serotype or PFGE pattern of the isolates from this product sample. FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
3 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 3 In 2004, there were 16 cases of salmonellosis (Salmonella Heidelberg) documented in Oregon, with PFGE pattern combination JF6X /JF6A This was a new two enzyme PFGE pattern combination for Oregon, and it is a relatively uncommon pattern combination in the national database, representing approximately 5% of Salmonella Heidelberg patterns. Date of illness onsets ranged from June to September, Epidemiological interviews revealed that two (2) persons reported consumption of product from P-6164A and two (2) other individuals consumed chicken of unknown source prior to illness onset. Also, one of the illnesses occurring in September was in an employee working at a grower facility for Foster Poultry Farms; per State health officials, the majority of birds from that grower facility go to P6164A. Additionally, Washington State had seventeen (17) cases of Salmonella Heidelberg matching the same PFGE pattern combination, JF6X /JF6A Seven (7) of these patients had known poultry exposure, unknown source. The illness PFGE pattern combination, JF6X /JF6A , matched one retail sample of chicken collected and tested by the State of Oregon, produced by 6164A. In summary, isolates from the 16 ill individuals in Oregon, the 17 ill individuals in Washington, and the one retail poultry sample from P6164A were all found to be indistinguishable by two enzyme PFGE analysis. Pattern combination, JF6X /JF6A , differs by one band from the most common Salmonella Heidelberg pattern combination in the national database, JF6X /JF6A , representing 55% of Salmonella Heidelberg patterns. Also during 2004, there were multiple Salmonella Heidelberg illnesses in Oregon and Washington with PFGE pattern combinations JF6X /JF6A and JF6X /JF6A These pattern combinations are relatively uncommon with (b) (4) JF6X /JF6A and JF6X /JF6A representing and 7% respectively in the PulseNet S. Heidelberg database. On visual inspection these two PFGE patterns were found to differ by a single band and were grouped together for epidemiologic evaluation purposes. A November 2004 PulseNet spreadsheet for these two related PFGE pattern combinations lists twenty (20) human cases distributed in six (6) states. The lab received date for the samples ranged from June through September Two enzyme PFGE pattern combinations were reported for ten (10) of twenty (20) human cases; five cases in Washington, four in Oregon, and one in Hawaii. The lab received date for the samples ranged from June through July The spreadsheet also included pattern identifiers for six (6) isolates from P- 6164A poultry samples collected by Oregon State officials at retail stores. These six (6) poultry isolates had PFGE pattern combinations JF6X /JF6A or JF6X /JF6A The lab received date for the samples ranged from May through September The state officials are re-interviewing the patients for potential poultry contact. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis is a molecular subtyping method that allows for the discrimination of bacterial isolates through the characterization of molecular proteins or nucleic acids. PulseNet, the Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Bacterial Disease Surveillance, compares PFGE patterns from bacterial isolates obtained from human specimens and food and environmental samples. Clustering of isolates by PFGE pattern can assist epidemiologic investigators focused on the identification of a common source. 2) Positive Salmonella Analyses of Est. P-6164A Product During the assessment, FSIS and plant records were reviewed regarding Salmonella testing for broilers and ground poultry. FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
4
5 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 5 Public Health Salmonella Testing Results: Oregon State s public health officials reported that nine (9) retail samples produced by P-6164A, Foster Poultry Farms, were collected and tested, all were positive for Salmonella Heidelberg. Seven (7) retail samples were collected for the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) Retail Study. Six (6) of these NARMS samples were positive for Salmonella Heidelberg with PFGE pattern combination. JF6X /JF6A and one NARMS sample was positive for Salmonella Heidelberg with PFGE pattern JF6X (no second enzyme was reported). The other two retail samples of raw intact chicken products, with freeze by dates of 10/6/04 and 10/17/04, were collected by the Oregon State epidemiologist at Costco in October, Both samples tested positive for Salmonella Heidelberg; one with PFGE pattern combination JF6X /JF6A and the other with JF6X /JF6A In addition, six human isolates and two chicken isolates were submitted for antimicrobial susceptibility. Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg is demonstrating increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents. One chicken isolate was resistant to Gentamycin and Streptomycin and the second isolate was inhibited by Streptomycin. None of the human isolates have demonstrated antimicrobial resistance. Salmonella Heidelberg Sample Linkage: As a result of the current Salmonella HACCP A-set sampling results provided by OPHS, the following conclusions may be drawn relating to the results to date: 1.) Eight (8) of fifteen (15) Salmonella isolates were serotype Heidelberg; 2.) Five (5) of the eight (8) Heidelberg match one of the three patterns previously identified in human illnesses in the States of Oregon and Washington. 3.) These results show that establishment P-6164A has had a problem with Salmonella Heidelberg, specifically with product PFGE patterns matching patterns found in human illnesses isolates from Oregon and Washington. 3) Failure to Comply with HACCP Regulatory Requirements ( 9 CFR Part 417) The findings below support that the establishment s HACCP plans are inadequate because they do not meet the requirements of 9 CFR Part CFR Hazard Analysis and HACCP Plan: The S. Heidelberg illnesses associated with Est. P-6164A product described above, plus the history of Salmonella positive samples of Est. P-6164A product also described above, clearly show that Salmonella is a hazard reasonably likely to occur before, during, and after entry into the establishment. The Hazard Analysis does not address Salmonella as a hazard reasonably likely to occur, and therefore fails to comply with 9 CFR 417.2(a). The Hazard Analysis only addresses Salmonella growth; to only address Salmonella growth is illogical if the Hazard Analysis does not in the first place address Salmonella as a hazard reasonably likely to occur. FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
6
7
8
9
10
11 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 11 Three (3) 06D01 NRs were written from 10/1/2004, through 1/1/2005, documenting noncompliance with requirements. One NR number , dated 10/11/2004 documents non-compliance due to an exposed cloth band-aid on the finger of an employee handling soaker pads and product trays. On 12/13/2004, NR number documents, a piece of 12" x 24"cardboard was observed folded in half with one half of it inside a tub in direct contact with raw chicken livers, the NR indicates that the entire tub of chicken livers was rendered by the company. On 12/16/2004, NR number , documents an evisceration lead person was observed by Consumer Safety Inspector (CSI) (b) (7)(C) dumping a barrel of condemned product in the condemned room. The employee then returned to the evisceration department and washed her hands but did not change her smock or put on an apron prior to returning to the main evisceration line to perform a presentation test. The main line was stopped and the product contacted by the employee was immediately rendered. The employee was counseled on proper product handling practices. Numerous NRs have been documented by FSIS personnel from June, 2004 through the present which continually demonstrate the plant employees did not understand or practice good hygiene or follow the establishment GMPs. There is no evidence or documentation of employee training or oversight by establishment supervision. Other specific references are covered under SSOP. 5) Failure to Comply with Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (9 CFR ) 9 CFR Development of SSOP The written SSOP does address the pre-operational procedures and the cleaning of food contact surfaces in both the evisceration and processing departments, and describes the daily activities that are conducted for pre-operational and operational sanitation inspections. However, the SSOP checklist used to monitor and verify the effectiveness of cleaning does not identify all equipment used by the plant. Therefore, the random selection approach that is described in the SSOP for equipment cannot be achieved, as all equipment is not considered when the establishment selects equipment to monitor and verify Maintenance of the SSOP Records reviewed revealed that SSOP re-evaluations are not being effectively conducted to address the deficiencies documented on FSIS NRs and weekly meeting notes as well as establishment QC records. As indicated by the linkage of the NRs and the recurring non-compliances, the establishment has failed to implement effective preventive measures in response to a food contact deficiency. In addition, the establishment has repeatedly failed to recognize and address the continual SSOP operational deficiencies involving insanitary practices and/or product cross contamination. For instance, from July, 2004, there were fourteen (14) NRs issued for unsanitary employee practices that resulted in cross contamination of product. There were thirteen (13) NRs written for grease smears and rail dust on broiler carcasses. There were seven (7) NRs for cross contamination as a result of contamination from trailing intestines on the evisceration line as a result of the PGI machine not functioning properly. Additional NR s were written for a variety of sanitation non-compliances. FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
12 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 12 From the date of December 9, 2004, to December 28, 2004, five additional operational sanitation NR s have been written and are documented on NRs 197 dated 12/06/04 for potential cross contamination; 201, dated 12/08/04, for potential cross contamination; 204, dated 12/13/04, for insanitary practices; 207, dated 12/17/04 and 211, dated 12/28/04, also for insanitary practices. During the month of August, 2004, direct product contamination was documented as repetitive NRs. Corrective actions during the time period did not address the issues of contamination in addressing adequate control and preventive measures. Additionally, the establishment stated in their response to the NRs after re-evaluation no changes or modifications were necessary to the SSOP Corrective Actions. Counseling of employees is being used and documented as a preventive measure in response to a food contact deficiency. However, the establishment could not provide any documentation to support the preventive measures of counseling the employee and monitoring the employee is actually being performed, or preventing reoccurrence Recordkeeping requirements. The establishment is conducting monitoring and verification and recording deficiencies on the days when deficiencies occur. However, the establishment does not generate records on the days when no deficiencies are found. Therefore, the establishment is not maintaining daily records as required. In addition, on numerous occasions when responding to noncompliance records the establishment s response has been employees have been counseled or trained. However, the establishment does not have any SSOP records to support that such counseling or training did in fact take place. 6) Failure to Comply with Poultry Products Inspection Requirements (9 CFR Part 381) 9 CFR Post-mortem Inspection, when required, extent, traditional, streamlined Inspection System (SIS), New Line Speed (NELS), Inspection System and the New Turkey Inspection (NTI) System; rate of inspection. Missing viscera, improper dispositions and inadequate presentations have been documented in both NR's and weekly plant meeting notes. The weekly meeting notes for 8/20/2004, 9/1/2004, 10/14/2004, 10/21/2004, 11/17/2004 and 12/8/2004 all indicate problems with plant trimmers/inspector s helper. According to the FSIS in-plant personnel, there is an on-going practice where the plant employees fail to drop giblet packs with intestines causing grossly contaminated viscera. When the intestines are pulled off viscera pacs in an unsanitary manner, fecal material becomes air-borne, causing cross-contamination of carcasses and equipment. Carcass presentation deficiencies, i.e. missing and non-uniform viscera, fecal and ingesta matter, were noted under procedure 06D02 in twelve NRs (130, 135, 146, 155, 156,159, 166, 174, 188, 203, and ) from 9/9/2004 to present. 9 CFR Contamination FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
13 Foster Poultry Farms, Est. P- 6164A, Notice of Intended Enforcement ( )15-05-N002 Page 13 Data collected from the eards pertaining to condemnation due to contaminated birds has been correlated to equipment malfunctions in the (b) (4) system. Maintenance personnel are responsible for adjusting equipment at the start of operation based on daily production records stating the origin of bird, lot size, age and weight of birds. The equipment adjustment made during operations is not documented. The findings of the in-plant FSIS personnel and observation of the FSA team is not consistent with the establishment s conclusion that the system is under control. After start up, the leading problems seen with the used of the (b) (4) system resulted from failure to maintain process control as evidenced by failing the No Viscera standard and failure to ensure synchronization of the viscera with the corresponding carcass. Inadequate equipment maintenance, substitution using other than (b) (4) compatible equipment, failure to adjust the equipment based on bird size, and attempts to process lots with birds of dissimilar size which exceeded the inherent system capacity to accommodate the range of sizes resulted in loss of process control. Summary FSIS Salmonella Performance Standard testing and plant Salmonella testing have identified a recurring presence of S. Heidelberg in your product. The most recent FSIS Performance Standard testing found eight of fifteen Salmonella isolates from the current A set sampling results were Heidelberg. Five of the eight Heidelberg match one of the three PFGE patterns previously identified in human illnesses in the States of Oregon and Washington including some people who have purchased or consumed your product. Given the low occurrence of this specific pathogen, the illness it has caused, and it s occurrence in your product, there is sufficient reason to believe that product produced by Foster Poultry Farms, Establishment P-6164A has borne this added poisonous substance at a level that has caused product to be injurious to health, and that the sanitary conditions, detailed above, under which product has been produced at Foster Poultry Farms, Establishment P-6164A, have not been adequate to ensure that product that is not injurious to health is produced. The District concludes poultry product in this establishment has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health, as defined in Section (g)(4) of the PPIA. In accordance with 9 CFR Part (Rules of Practice), FSIS is notifying you of our intent to withhold the marks of inspection and suspend the assignment of inspectors at your facility. Please provide this office with a written response concerning this notice of intended enforcement (NOIE) within three (3) working days from the date of receipt of this letter. We will determine further action, if any, based on your response. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may call the Boulder District Office at Sincerely, (b) (7)(C) District Manager Boulder District FSIS FORM (6/86) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES
14
USDA.
USDA United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Alameda District 620 Central Avenue, BIdg. 2C Alameda, CA 94501 Phone: (510)769-5712 Fax; (510)337-5081 October 7,2013 Mr.
More informationThe Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention
The Role of USDA s Food Safety and Inspection Service to Ensure Foodborne Disease Control and Prevention David Goldman, MD, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Public Health Science Agricultural Outlook
More informationFSIS Performance Standards for Chicken Parts and Comminuted Poultry
Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com MEMORANDUM From: Gary Jay Kushner Brian D. Eyink Leigh G. Barcham
More informationContinuous Food Safety Innovation as a Management Strategy: Public Perspective
Continuous Food Safety Innovation as a Management Strategy: Public Perspective DANIEL ENGELJOHN, PhD Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Policy, Program, and Employee Development Washington, DC 2007
More informationFSIS DIRECTIVE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC FSIS DIRECTIVE 7700.1 2-22-00 I. PURPOSE IRRADIATION OF MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS This directive provides inspection
More informationCase 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00895-JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 1220 L Street NW, Suite 300 Washington,
More informationFood Commissaries under FSMA and the US FDA model Food Code
Food Commissaries under FSMA and the US FDA model Food Code Introduction A food commissary is a facility or operation that procures and/or produces foods intended for distribution. A retail or foodservice
More informationAnimal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat and meat products. to be exported from Russian Federation to Japan.
Animal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat Animal health requirements for heat-processed poultry meat and meat products to be exported from Russian Federation to 1. This document defines
More informationTown and Country Compounding and Consultation Services, LLC 10/17/17
Town and Country Compounding and Consultation Services, LLC 10/17/17 Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations I 10 Waterview Blvd, 3rd FL Parsippany, NJ 07054 Telephone: (973) 331-4900 FAX: (973)
More informationcgmp (21 CFR 111) Regulation and Compliance Overview
cgmp (21 CFR 111) Regulation and Compliance Overview Neogen Effective Compliance Seminar September 23, 2014 Michael McGuffin President, American Herbal Products Association mmcguffin@ahpa.org Regulation
More informationUse of Microbiological Testing and Microbiological Criteria in Regulatory Programs for Meat, Poultry, and Processed Egg Products
Use of Microbiological Testing and Microbiological Criteria in Regulatory Programs for Meat, Poultry, and Processed Egg Products Daniel Engeljohn Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Policy, Program
More informationFSIS Salmonella Update
1 Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Salmonella Update Kristin G. Holt, DVM, MPH FSIS Liaison to CDC Atlanta, GA October 22, 2018 USAHA Subcommittee on Salmonella 2 Mission in Action We are the public
More informationTSDR Pharmacy Inc. dba brandmd Skin Care 11/9/17
TSDR Pharmacy Inc. dba brandmd Skin Care 11/9/17 Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations IV 19701 Fairchild, Irvine, CA 92612-2506 Telephone: 949-608-2900 Fax: 949-608-4417 WARNING LETTER VIA SIGNATURE
More informationTable: PBIS NonCompliance Reports for Plants requested in FOIA for 03J01 and 04C04 1st Shift Procedures from 3/1/11-8/31/11.
Table: PBIS NonCompliance Reports for Plants requested in FOIA 2011-00258 for 03J01 and 04C04 1st Shift Procedures from 3/1/11-8/31/11 NRNumber EstID EstNbr EstName Stat e Date Shift Procedur e Regulation
More informationFood Safety Federal Efforts to Protect Public Health
Public Health Law Series Webinar Food Safety Federal Efforts to Protect Public Health February 25, 2016 How to Use Webex Audio: If you can hear us through your computer, you do not need to use your phone.
More informationFood Safety and Inspection Service ~~ Update ~~
~~ Update ~~ Farm-To-Fork Continuum 7 th Annual OutbreakNet Conference PulseNet and OutbreakNet: Evolving Connectivity in Food Safety Kristin G. Holt, D.V.M., M.P.H. FSIS Liaison to CDC September 21, 2011
More informationOverview of Dietary Supplement GMP Inspection Trends Quality Session 6
Overview of Dietary Supplement GMP Inspection Trends Quality Session 6 Presented by: Dean R. Cirotta, MBA President & Chief Operating Officer EAS Consulting Group, LLC 1700 Diagonal Road, Suite 750 Alexandria,
More informationVIOLATIONS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
VIOLATIONS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS Food Safety Forum Tuesday, July 17, 2018 FOODBORNE ILLNESS RISK FACTORS While the food supply in the United States is one of the safest in the world, the Centers for
More informationFDA Foodborne Illness Risk Factor Study Data Collection Form
APPENDIX O 2105 Data Collection Wake County Facility ID# Sample # QA FDA Foodborne Illness Risk Factor Study Data Collection Form Date: Time In: Time Out: Inspector: Establishment: Manager: Physical Address:
More informationAvailability of FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Allergens and. Ingredients of Public Health Concern: Identification, Prevention
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/16/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-28935, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 3410-DM-P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
More informationCalifornia Custom Processing Plant Quality Assurance Plan
California Custom Processing Plant Quality Assurance Plan ABC Poultry Los Angeles Phone: (801) 798-2593 Fax: (801) 798-8243 The purpose of this plan is to provide a Quality Assurance Plan for Custom Process
More informationResponding to a Food Recall
Responding to a Food Recall Time: 4 hours National Food Service Management Institute The University of Mississippi 2013 Table of Contents Objectives... ii Lesson 1: Introduction to the Food Recall Process...
More informationTalon Compounding Pharmacy 10/3/17
Talon Compounding Pharmacy 10/3/17 Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations, Division II 4040 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75204 October 3, 2017 CMS Case # 522630 VIA UPS EXPRESS WARNING
More informationCommercial Feed Mill Verification Task Procedures
Introduction The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is dedicated to safeguarding food, animals and plants, which enhances the health and well-being of Canada s people, environment and economy. As part
More informationSan Diego Compounding Pharmacy 9/25/17
San Diego Compounding Pharmacy 9/25/17 Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations IV 19701 Fairchild Road Los Angeles, CA 92612 WARNING LETTER VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SIGNATURE REQUIRED September
More informationFood Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Overview
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Overview Achyut Adhikari Assistant Professor & Extension Food Safety Specialist School of Nutrition and Food Sciences Louisiana State University AgCenter Why Food Safety?
More informationPublic Health Service Food and Drug Administration San Francisco District 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA Telephone: 510/
Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration San Francisco District 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA 94502-7070 Telephone: 510/337-6700 WARNING LETTER December
More informationExpert Elicitation on the Relative Risks of Processed Meat and Poultry Products
Expert Elicitation on the Relative Risks of Processed Meat and Poultry Products Presented by Mary K. Muth, Shawn A. Karns, and Michaela C. Coglaiti RTI International Presented at Public Meeting on Risk
More informationOVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES. Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001
OVERVIEW OF FOOD SAFETY REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES Presented By William C. Balek International Sanitary Supply Association March 30, 2001 I INTRODUCTION The regulation of food safety in the United
More informationStonegate Pharmacy LP 11/10/16
Stonegate Pharmacy LP 11/10/16 November 10, 2016 2017 DAL WL 03 WARNING LETTER UPS Overnight Rene F. Garza, Pharm.D., Chief Executive Officer Stonegate Pharmacy, LP 2501 W. William Cannon Drive, Suite
More informationMA PHIT- Food Certificate Program
1 Explain MDPH role in foodborne illness prevention and control Describe the function of the Working Group Summarize the role of local board of health (LBOH) 2 The Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
More informationSandoz Inc. 12-Aug-08
Sandoz Inc. 12-Aug-08 Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Atlanta District Office 60 8th Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 August 12, 2008 VIA FEDERAL
More informationAnimal Health Requirements for poultry meat etc. to be exported to Japan from Finland
Animal Health Requirements for poultry meat etc. to be exported to Japan from Finland Animal Health requirements for poultry meat etc. (hereinafter referred to as the exported poultry meat etc. ) are applied
More informationThis whitepaper will cover the suggested methodology to be employed when developing a PCP plan. This includes how to develop your plan in accordance
This whitepaper will cover the suggested methodology to be employed when developing a PCP plan. This includes how to develop your plan in accordance with FSMA s Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human
More informationFDA RELEASES FOOD CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE MODERNIZATION REPORT
November 17, 2005 FDA RELEASES FOOD CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE MODERNIZATION REPORT Executive Summary On November 2, 2005, FDA issued the Food CGMP Modernization - A Focus on Food Safety report.
More informationCuring as a Single Special Process Regulatory Agency Jurisdiction NAME (fill in form)
Single Hazard Special Process HACCP Template for Curing as a Single Special Process Regulatory Agency Jurisdiction NAME (fill in form) Date Submitted Date Approved Valid until A. General Information This
More informationCampylobacter ENTERITIS SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL
Campylobacter ENTERITIS SURVEILLANCE PROTOCOL Public Health Action 1. Educate providers and laboratories to report stool cultures positive for Campylobacter jejuni or Campylobacter coli from patients within
More informationPublic Health Service Food and Drug Administration Dallas District 4040 North Central Expressway Dallas, Texas
Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Dallas District 4040 North Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 75204-3128 March 30, 2010 2010-DAL-WL-08 CERTIFIED
More informationShawn Stevens Food Industry Consultant and Lawyer
Shawn Stevens Food Industry Consultant and Lawyer stevens@foodindustrycounsel.com 920.698.2561 COMPLYING WITH FSMA S PREVENTIVE CONTROL RULE AS A SMALL BUSINESS COMPLYING WITH FSMA S PREVENTIVE CONTROL
More informationFOOD SAFETY. USDA Should Take Further Action to Reduce Pathogens in Meat and Poultry Products
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2018 FOOD SAFETY USDA Should Take Further Action to Reduce Pathogens in Meat and Poultry Products GAO-18-272 March
More informationUSDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection
USDA-FSIS Agency Report 2013 Fall Executive Board Meeting Conference for Food Protection John M. Hicks, Jr., DVM, MPH Office of Policy and Program Development Food Safety Inspection Service U.S. Department
More informationHieber's Pharmacy 12/5/17
Hieber's Pharmacy 12/5/17 Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations I 10 Waterview Blvd, 3rd FL Parsippany, NJ 07054 Telephone: (973) 331-4900 FAX: (973) 331-4969 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
More informationPerformance Indicators for Foodborne Disease Programs
Chapter A long-standing goal of CDC and national public health professional organizations has been to build state and local capacity for detecting and preventing illness. In 1997, CDC convened an expert
More informationCERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. Esther Hernandez President United States Blood Bank, Inc NW 95th Avenue Miami, Florida
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD 20993 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Esther Hernandez President United States Blood Bank, Inc. 2400 NW 95th
More informationForeign Supplier Verification Programs for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0143 Reference 2: FDA, Proposed 21 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1, Subpart L Foreign Supplier
More informationEvaluation of Tennessee Foodborne Illness and Outbreak Response Using the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak and Response (CIFOR) Metrics
Evaluation of Tennessee Foodborne Illness and Outbreak Response Using the Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak and Response (CIFOR) Metrics 12/31/2014 Tennessee Integrated Food Safety Center of Excellence
More informationMicrobial Problems, Causes, and Solutions in Meat and Poultry Processing Operations. Helen G. Brown, PhD Research Specialist Tyson Foods, Inc
Microbial Problems, Causes, and Solutions in Meat and Poultry Processing Operations Helen G. Brown, PhD Research Specialist Tyson Foods, Inc NR Non-Compliance Record Plant Process SSOP HACCP Description
More information2017 FDA Food Code. FDA/CFSAN Retail Food Policy Team
2017 FDA Food Code FDA/CFSAN Retail Food Policy Team The FDA Food Code: Provides FDA s current thinking on food safety and sanitation in the retail food sector. Can be uniformly adopted as a statute, regulation
More informationIndividual Test Item Specifications
Individual Test Item Specifications 8129210- Food Science 2 2015 The contents of this document were developed under a grant from the United States Department of Education. However, the content does not
More informationSelf-declaration of the recovery of freedom from Avian Influenza in poultry by Japan
Self-declaration of the recovery of freedom from Avian Influenza in poultry by Japan Declaration sent to the OIE on 15 April 2018 by Dr Kazuo ITO, Delegate of Japan to the OIE, Director General of Animal
More informationFoodborne Outbreak Linked to Pork Consumption. Jennifer Koeman, DVM, MSc, MPH, DACVPM National Pork Board
Foodborne Outbreak Linked to Pork Consumption Jennifer Koeman, DVM, MSc, MPH, DACVPM National Pork Board Background On July 23, 2015, the Washington State Department of Health issued a news release about
More informationOptimum Bioenergy International Corp. 12/21/17
Optimum Bioenergy International Corp. 12/21/17 Office of Human and Animal Food Division 5 West 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA 94502-7070 Sent Via UPS Signature Required WARNING LETTER December 21,
More informationBetter Health Lab, Inc 2/18/15
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Protecting and Promoting Your Health Better Health Lab, Inc 2/18/15 Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration New Jersey
More informationAPril PUlseNet
Issues in Brief Pulsenet: A Critical Food Safety Surveillance System Association of Public Health Laboratories APril 2010 PUlseNet A Critical Food Safety Surveillance System Public health laboratorians
More informationFood Safety and Inspection Service: Labeling Guideline on Documentation Needed to Substantiate Animal Raising Claims for Label Submission
Labeling Guideline on Documentation Needed to Substantiate Animal Raising Claims for Label Submission Presentation given today by: Tammie M. Ballard, Food Technologist, Animal Raising Team Leader, Labeling
More informationThe FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: The Key New Requirements
June 15, 2011 The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: The Key New Requirements Executive Summary INSTITUTE FOR FOOD LAWS & REGULATIONS Michigan State University 140 G.M. Trout Building East Lansing, MI
More informationFinal Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food http://www.fda.gov/fsma THE FUTURE IS NOW 1 Background Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food
More informationFDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) January 4, 2011
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) January 4, 2011 FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) The Most Sweeping Reform of the U.S. Food Safety Laws in More than 70 Years FDA Food Safety Modernization
More informationSurveillance and outbreak response are major components
CHAPTER Performance Indicators for Foodborne Disease Programs Surveillance and outbreak response are major components of states foodborne investigation capacity and are essential for preventing and controlling
More informationInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Page 1 of 6 Home Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Enforcement Actions Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations P.A. Benjamin Manufacturing
More informationRaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6/20/17
Raritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6/20/17 U.S. Food & Drug Administration Division of Pharmaceutical Quality Operations I New Jersey District 10 Waterview Boulevard, 3rd Floor Parsippany, NJ 07054 June 20,
More informationFood Safety Risk Management
1 Food Safety Risk Management Ruth L. Petran, Ph. D. Corporate Scientist, Food Safety 02 October 2012 2 Discussion Overview Food safety trends and data Need risk management focus Risk based preventive
More informationGuidelines for the Application of a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) System in a Meat
Meat Plant HACCP Guidelines for the Application of a Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) System in a Meat Plant Prepared by: Food Protection BC Centre for Disease Control In Collaboration with:
More informationPurpose of this Document
Guidance on the Procedures for Joint Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approval of Ingredients and Sources of Radiation Used in the Production of Meat and
More informationMultistate Foodborne Outbreaks: Investigation and Communication Process
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Multistate Foodborne Outbreaks: Investigation and Communication Process Matthew Wise, MPH, PhD Deputy Branch Chief for Outbreak Response Laura
More informationFPP.01: Examine components of the food industry and historical development of food products and processing.
Food Products and Processing Systems AG3 and AG4 Essential Questions: 1. How do the components and history of the food industry affect the development of food products and processing? 2. How do safety
More informationREVISED CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR IRRADIATED FOODS CODEX STAN , REV
Irradiated foods Page 1 of 10 1. SCOPE REVISED CODEX GENERAL STANDARD FOR IRRADIATED FOODS CODEX STAN 106-1983, REV.1-2003 This standard applies to foods processed by ionizing radiation that is used in
More informationFood Safety Performance Standards: an Epidemiologic Perspective
Food Safety Performance Standards: an Epidemiologic Perspective Institute t of Medicine i Food dforum Meeting Rajal Mody, MD MPH LCDR US Public Health Service Enteric Diseases Epidemiology Branch Centers
More informationFood Purchasing & Receiving Review
Food Purchasing & Receiving Review Food Purchasing and Receiving 1. The first step in maintaining the safety of the food you prepare and serve, is to ensure that the food is safe as it enters your establishment.
More informationPrepared by Wake County Environmental Services, Environmental Health & Safety Division
Wake County, North Carolina Report on the Occurrence of Foodborne Illness Risk Factors in Selected Institutional Foodservice, Restaurant, and Retail Food Store Facility Types 2015 Prepared by Wake County
More informationLEAD SAFETY PROGRAM. Purpose. Scope. Responsibilities. Southern Heat Exchanger Services Safety Program
Page: Page 1 of 5 Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to identify the controls and actions necessary to prevent adverse health effects to employees from occupational exposure to lead, and to ensure
More informationFDA and USDA Food Safety Regulations 101: Preventing Adulteration and Contamination
Food Law and Regulation Boot Camp November 15-16, 2016 FDA and USDA Food Safety Regulations 101: Preventing Adulteration and Contamination Justin J. Prochnow Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig Mollie Kober
More informationMONBEEF PTY LTD ESTABLISHMENT 0952 HACCP, E. COLI O157:H7, SRM and ANIMAL WELFARE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
08 January 2019 To Whom It May Concern: MONBEEF PTY LTD ESTABLISHMENT 0952 HACCP, E. COLI O157:H7, SRM and ANIMAL WELFARE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This statement should be read in conjunction with the Australian
More informationCOURSE BOOK FOOD SAFETY ON THE GO MODULE 4: FOOD SERVICE WORKERS (STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS) 2012 EDITION
COURSE BOOK FOOD SAFETY ON THE GO MODULE 4: FOOD SERVICE WORKERS (STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS) 2012 EDITION Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Module 4 - Food service workers (staff and volunteers)... 3 Length...
More informationAlignment of FSMA with Existing Food Safety Programs International Citrus & Beverage Conference
Alignment of FSMA with Existing Food Safety Programs International Citrus & Beverage Conference Donald Kautter US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Food
More informationProduct Recalls. Protecting Public Health. Presented by William Stewart & Thomas DiBruno
Product Recalls Protecting Public Health Presented by William Stewart & Thomas DiBruno Overview Agency s Mission Office of Field Operation (OFO) FSIS Directive 8080.1 Rev 5 Recall Effectiveness Checks
More informationPreventive Controls for Human Foods & Preventive Controls Qualified Individuals
Preventive Controls for Human Foods & Preventive Controls Qualified Individuals MATTHEW TAYLOR TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY USDA NIFA AWARD NUMBER 2015-70020-24397 Food Safety Modernization Act I thank the President
More informationImplementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry
Implementation of indicators for biological hazards by meat inspection of poultry Ellerbroek, L. Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Diedersdorfer Weg 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany. *Corresponding
More informationAKA Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Certification Program
AKA Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Certification Program Preamble The American Kratom Association (AKA) is establishing this program to assure the safety and integrity of kratom dietary supplements
More informationReishi D. International, Inc. 2/6/18
Reishi D. International, Inc. 2/6/18 San Francisco District Office 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA 94502-7070 Via UPS Overnight February 7, 2018 Mr. Zheng Xiong Li, CEO Reishi D. International, Inc.
More informationPublic Health Risks of Consuming Raw Milk Products - Surveillance and Prevention Efforts in the United States
Public Health Risks of Consuming Raw Milk Products - Surveillance and Prevention Efforts in the United States Casey Barton Behravesh, DVM, DrPH, DACVPM LCDR, US Public Health Service Enteric Diseases Epidemiology
More informationThe Food Safety Modernization Act A Series on What is Essential for a Food Professional to Know
SPECIAL INTEREST PAPER The Food Safety Modernization Act A Series on What is Essential for a Food Professional to Know [ Article 2. Hazard Analysis and Risk Based Preventive Controls [ Theodora Morille-Hinds*
More informationSURVEILLANCE AND DETECTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESSES
SURVEILLANCE AND DETECTION OF FOODBORNE ILLNESSES Ratih Dewanti-Hariyadi Department of Food Science and Technology SEAFAST Center Bogor Agricultural University INTRODUCTION Detecting outbreaks requires
More informationOutbreak Alert! Trends in Foodborne Illness Outbreaks in the United States ( )
5 th MEETING PAN AMERICAN COMMISSION ON FOOD SAFETY (COPAIA) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June 10, 2008 Provisional Agenda Item 5 COPAIA5/5 (Eng.) May, 28 th 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Outbreak Alert! Trends in
More informationYersiniosis rev Apr 2017
rev Apr 2017 BASIC EPIDEMIOLOGY Infectious Agent Yersinia species, a Gram negative bacilli. Y. enterocolitica is the species most commonly associated with human infection. Y. pseudotuberculosis infection
More informationFDA and Fresh Spinach Safety
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM MAJORITY STAFF MARCH 2008 FDA and Fresh Spinach Safety PREPARED FOR CHAIRMAN HENRY A. WAXMAN CHAIRWOMAN ROSA DELAURO
More informationFSMA & The Dietary Supplements Industry
FSMA & The Dietary Supplements Industry Overview FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Preventive Controls for Human Food (PCHF) Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) Produce Verification activities
More informationSubmitted via
U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Patriots Plaza 3 1400 Independence Avenue SW Mailstop 3782, Room 8-163B Washington, DC 20250-3700 Submitted via www.regulations.gov Comments
More informationUSDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy. James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute
USDA s New Shiga Toxin- Producing Escherichia coli Policy James Hodges Executive Vice President American Meat Institute June 20, 2012 Final Determination and Request for Comments (FDRC) September 20, 2011
More informationGCC Guide for Control on Imported Foods
Secretariat General of the Gulf Cooperation Council The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf GCC GCC Guide for Control on Imported Foods Dr. BANDAR M. ALODIANI April 2018 1 Introduction:
More informationAlberta Health and Wellness Public Health Notifiable Disease Management Guidelines August 2011
August 2011 Campylobacteriosis Revision Dates Case Definition Reporting Requirements Remainder of the Guideline (i.e., Etiology to References sections inclusive) August 2011 August 2011 October 2005 Case
More informationNewsworthy Nuggets FSIS FERN Surveillance. Kristi McCallum APHL Annual Meeting June 8, 2016
Newsworthy Nuggets FSIS FERN Surveillance Kristi McCallum APHL Annual Meeting June 8, 2016 Background The CDA-BCL has been a USDA FSIS FERN CAP laboratory since 2008 Focused on method development and method
More informationPFC Training Courses & Programs. Course Descriptions. 1. Core Cannabis Training (CCT) [pre-requisite for all PFC Courses]
PFC Training Courses & Programs Core Cannabis Training (CCT) National Cannabis Standards Courses (NCST) State Specific Compliance Training (SSCT) PFC Enrichment Courses (PFCEC) PFC Verified Professional
More informationSalmonellosis. Frequently Asked Questions
Salmonellosis Frequently Asked Questions What is salmonellosis? What sort of germ is Salmonella? How can Salmonella infections be diagnosed? How can Salmonella infections be treated? Are there long-term
More informationCIFOR performance measure Measurement methods Target Range Minnesota 2013 Performance 1. Foodborne illness complaint reporting system:
CIFOR Target Ranges for Select Performance Measures Interested in calculating the CIFOR target range performance measures for your jurisdiction, but have questions or need assistance? Contact Joshua.rounds@state.mn.us
More informationSalmonella Outbreaks Linked to Poultry United States
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Salmonella Outbreaks Linked to Poultry United States Megin Nichols, DVM, MPH, DACVPM Enteric Zoonoses Lead Outbreak Response and Prevention
More informationOVERVIEW OF THE USDA ARS & FSIS FRANKFURTER STORAGE STUDY
OVERVIEW OF THE USDA ARS & FSIS FRANKFURTER STORAGE STUDY John B. Luchansky, Ph.D. John B. Luchansky, Ph.D. Agricultural Research Service Eastern Regional Research Center Microbial Food Safety Research
More informationRock Solid Nutrition, LLC 12/22/16
Rock Solid Nutrition, LLC 12/22/16 December 22, 2016 WARNING LETTER Kansas City District Office 8050 Marshall Drive - Suite 205 Lenexa, Kansas 66214-1524 913-495-5100 VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OVERNIGHT
More informationFebruary 2016 Melanie Harris Iowa RRT and Foodborne Illness Response Coordinator Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals
February 2016 Melanie Harris Iowa RRT and Foodborne Illness Response Coordinator Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals Food and Lodging Regulation in General Department of Inspections and Appeals
More information