! "# 4., N N )?; : /# # 52 8I /# 9 0.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "! "# 4., N N )?; : /# # 52 8I /# 9 0."

Geoffrey James
5 years ago
Views:

1 ! "# '()* MOD $%& 2 1 *-1 *"+ -,-,. /0* *"+ % &% &!" #$ -1 % & & *#+!" #$ (() -2 $+ )$(* $ %& '(."." 2 MOD! :., MOD 4 7" 89 (. 02 )" /3 0/4 " 56, -. / 0&.1( >.?@ 4 -; A: / <= 7" 89 (6 (. ": &1; )(* 4 : H6/ MOD 2 0/4 " 6 / )2 F(G 8 & Bleaching shield 6 " %0/5?, N>7 56, -.? 1/5 " 2M N56, -. /" ; /I 42J )" 9K 4.L )" 2.I ; Z100., 6 " &).P. 3? 1/5 )" 56, / & -. / >," 56, -.? 1/5 " 2M 0421 )X4 37 <; 4 U6 24 )" &).P.I 06" )(/ R )2 02Q(G / Q+. F" A1M& 4 4/ 0/ / -; Universal testing machine 16 )?6/ )" 6. (; 0/95 MPY )X4 " Tukey / One-way ANOVA 02/4 )?6/ )" ; 6 )" 0&.I 56, -. " ^39) A/ /I 4 N 873/11 ±243/5 ( 6, -. /") >/ /I 4 A@6 1 : ±305 (56, /& -.) A42J /I 4 / 824/22±330/2 (>," 56, -. " ^39) A.6 /I 4 N 750/53 ±270/7(>7 56, / & -. " P& MOD 02P 4 "" 4 /3 ), _ 04; (;.; 6 )"1499/25 /I )6 & " 04 M 04; %!` NA42J /I _ 1 4QU )".(P<0/05) ". &" 04 2&/I 6 " 04M 4.Y )" M %!` 2&/I 6 / 1 0&/ "" 4 4 A@6. 7" 89 ( &56, -. " P& MOD :. A@6 " K` + 56, 82M. N& , N A@6 N )?; : 1385/1392/2/31 : 1392/2/7 : 1383/1391/6/16 : 9 #9. # +4%-/ */0 567 $8+" */01%" $%*+",-. */01%" /23 $) #$%&'& ()!" :!" " e.mail:nargespanahandeh@yahoo.com &7 89: # 0 =. 5! # % : S # %:A 3 &(3). PJQ %60 0C A /# # 52 8I /# 9 0, -. 1 % &(4).9 U$V # /$T# 8, C A 891A Y &HI X 90 %W.5 52 J2 C A = Z0A (5) 4# 5 6, -. / ! &;< /:1. = # 7 89: 5B 1 / 6A 90.5 >?9 /01 # /0C A > 0# $* 1!A /0# %" #F &(1).99A 4! % 891 # 8A 52 J2 = &K # MOD HIG - =. 5! 1 / &(2).

2 289 -,-,. /0* *"+ /!2A\ CA # m # % /\4 6A " # 10 9$.$. iui r / # 6^g CEJ! - si 6 6 0/3 5)Q 6A /^ 6 $.5.$ * % 6 i^ PDL 5)Q! - t 25 `* 6 9! /0r # j< 5! 0. 5 CEJ /$u1* HI m & 62 " # (3M ESPE-USA) Impergum soft /.$ /!! PDL > 5 H u1* -! HI 6 # X! >?* # Bleaching shield (Easy vac gasket-korea)! G2_ 82 # 8 6 # 6?1*. 6 Zv H =: h /!! 90 %9 6 # #! w! &X# =! H.5.$ *.9$ 61# 51I 6 x_* /:1. /6!. 6 # 6! S() MOD HI 6 5 m90 # 0/8 `* (Diaswiss-Swiss) yj HI 6 79! m!. 0.5.$ h,. PA t &8 A9 6+. ½ :HI 891A Y PA Y & 6 :Cavo surface 6#!! 81 - :8h94 PA t # - :8h94.(1 >) CEJ /, 1"! \H \ 6\U$ /1 5 6 %\ ]0!# &5.\$ S+ A I 50 # % 72 6 $9?2W &?! 6I 6-01 &(6).6. / %.^ YJ # *?! 6_`9 # 6I # *! H 6 > %A 5?B+ # %9< =I " %?! =a / 05!A 9 % ]0 (7) ?2 4 /0# S 6 G1 / >1 6 % 72 =. 5! 52 W % 2 5#_ HI 6 # $ % / ;(< 6 6d2 = &(8).0 Z0A 6 " MOD B` 6 SHI 6A 6 = B Z. / % B < &(9).5 e+ (11-10).99A 9 G_2g / 64! & G_2 / 6 5?2?J = >I 4#.$ S W % 69 #F 6 &0 Z. % %! # 690 /, 6\I # \99A h >\_ /\ /\! Z. 6 5?2 / 0> # 5< C A Z 0 G_2 / % B &(12) X$ &(13).99A 9 * 72 5_ / /0# 52 B C A Z 6A (15-14).0 Z. /. Z S#H /01 V 62_ 6J1` =! i0, -. 1 / #_ /# C A.!A MOD G *78 9:;< :1 5. h 8 o#! H e. /$! G2_ #$ W 6.( S+ 6 #$) * { %# SHI 8# #$. 6 8, C A p` _. # #$ &(A) 2 > (89A #\$ &(B) 2 > A \ 1/5 % *3 4 1 % >W J h 0!" 6J1` = =.$ * / # $! / 6A, -. * H j< 2 % k^.5.$ =A %0/5 8B Z!" h %! 6 891A # 82!. /!\ # \$ /\$! m1a 6 # /`< % # 6n 891A # 5H0 82 /0 p`. o) 0/5

3 ... =>?# 3? = A 1. 97" =-1BC *D B 52 h %! 6I =! m Universal testing machine! H.$ / $ o" # :?# 3? =*0$ Universal testing 9 6BH+ /0r # *. 6 % 6#! 6A /^ 6 & 5V machine # S+ 6 # 64 H+ % 9 B 6 6 # A /? 6 8!A /0# 6 5H0`* 6 /. A 6 # 6 #.% /A p` >( *. 6 / 6 6A 61# /# # 6_* 0/5 8J % 52 %! #.(15) (4 >) 8 = 52 Ä # % # 5. Z. %! H " 5 6 /0.$ 5?V = 0/95 %9^ 64 Tukey # ANOVA /" /052. 1" * KL 1 :4 5 -"MH /!, /# = 0 6h # >B! J ( A Z %#) 8# #$ / (Mean±SD) 52 (8, C A Z _.) # #$ & 873/11±243/5 (8A C A Z _.) #$ & 750/53±270/ /25 ± 305 W #$ # 824/22 ±330/2 if< 6A % One-way ANOVA.(1 8#4) ".(P <0/05) 4# 0#$ = /9J Tukey 52! 0#$ = if< % Å) / 9 6A A Å) 1"! >+I 7. H 6_ # 9J 0#$ 6_ W #$ = if< (P >0/05). 9J S.F< A 1/5 % 6 8A C A p` _. 8, # 8A /0C A p` W #$ # (C) 2> A} 6!, (D) 2 > A 1/5 % 6 QI6J1` 0!" 6A h"! 6A 5 4# 89. % # 89. /0C A = #H C A # 0 # 8 /! %2 / &5. A % - 6 *78 4* => :2 5 # 6 m 6A /! "! J 15 # 9 I 6V S m # ~ %37 -H2. 4 I 6V 0 # 2 6V 15 S 6 o".$ -< * HI PA (3M ESPE-USA) Single bond ]9 Light (ART BONART Co 6V 52 S 6 # 6 (3M ESPE USA) Z100 5!A.\\$ \A & Taiwan) HI # 5)Q AI 06, S+ A 6V >W S 6 Light cure # * (Easy vac gasket u1* 0 5!A <" 6,. xfa G A A &Korea) bleaching shield.(3 >) G1 % 6?> Bleaching shield $ 7" 3 =$$3 : 3 5 -B<$F GH* IJ =$$3 m # / o" 5 24 S 6.$ Z1 (Diaitaly Italy) J 6J!.! H

4 291 -,-,. /0* *"+ -1?# 3? =- =L 9S RH" :1 K?# 3? *O+8 5J8 PB 9:;< > -*0 1216/69 455/ /11 243/ 5 10 A Z %# K 1466/26 562/ /53 270/ , C A Z Q 1431/49 410/ 5 824/22 330/ A C A Z Q1 1975/22 959/ / , # 8A C A Z Q>2 6 tj _!, Overley G / % G1 %!, Rigidity 6A G1 % # 69 G % Stiffness 6A 1I.. G1 %\! \A G %# # HI / % (22) C A Z 6A A F % B! < 0#T =.0 Z0A % #_ C A Z w! 6 HI 6 6d2 = QI 6J1` 7 &(23 &18) #_ Z. É C A Z 6A % # A 64 6$= % 6d2 =. % 8^ 2/3 #I # /! GhI e. /0#T 6A 6 %! &Z 54 C A 8h94 #!A #_! < % 5! 5 6 #.0C A % >1 6 6 Z0A 5#_ 6A A F < /0#T % B! 0#$ % Functional C A Z 52 6 Z %" C A # 0 6A 52 5#_ 6d2 = 6J1` = (24-23,11). #H #_ % 6A 0 % # /9J if< C A # 0 Z 0 / # 6 Functional C A 9 Z 0 / C A % 8 % if< = 5. %" C A = /# G X2$ # Non-functional Nonfunctional C A < 6J1` 6A 1I A %9 0#T. 8 %9 6 =! 5!A 6A % 6J1` = A 7 1 / K # MOD SHI?! G - N3 K SF! MOD G! m % 52 xf?* 6A /^%0 &(18).!# u 5 6, -. /0\1 2 3\ & (19).5! % " # A /0#\ \9 /!! /\ 6A # w 5#_ %$$ > 6 0$ 99A >B # 8!A! /0# 52 * 6A Z0A /si % % &(20).\9A >B %"! \A I # %\4 6A $ * Va 5B % #_ = A! j< $ # 89A 5B $ =! /2 6A \ /\ 50 *# 3Q # 5* %\$ # \Ç / / 6 t_b 2 = &(1).0 e %\ =\. 5! 6 / % o` / &, /. /# > > & SF &/A j< /A SAI &% 6 /! % 0 &0%:A 8 > &$ &t /0 &! u /0C A S{ # /:1. SF &6 Å* (21).9... # = 5 6 % < / o\` / 6A 99A \9 =9W / C A 6A 5 \\06\ &MOD SHI /\\ SJ1`.0 Z0A 0C A \$< # \ 6A 5 % -,\. 1" -A \h * &06 6 # 6 1!A Z Strain X#! H Hood &(13).0 Z0A _ 0 Overley $99A 5_ V gauges?2 Stiffness \\_. % 6\ /0\HI #

5 ... =>?# 3? = A 1. 97" =-1BC *D 292 *< *H /#9. # Z0#T 6J 5#J! 6 #= B k^ = 690 6A!0 /94 =.$ * &A =a U h A /A # 6 %! 79 61_!0 /94 6 6A 04. &5 6Ñ REFERENCES 1. Sanei M, Torabzadeh H. Influence of composite thickness on fracture resistance of direct restorations in root canal treated teeth. [Thesis]. Tehran: Dental school. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; Summit B, Robbins J, Hilton J, Schwarz S. A contemporary approach. IN: Summit B, Robbins J, Schwarz S. Fundermental of operative dentistery. 3 th ed. [S.L]: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2006, Safaei A, Aminian R. The influence of cavity design preparation on fracture resistance of posterior direct resin composite restorations. [Thesis]. Tehran: Dental School. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2009, Khera Satia C, Carpenter Chistopher W, Vetter James D, Staley Robert N. Anatomy of Casps of Posterior Teeth and their Fracture Potential. J Prosthet Dent Aug; 64(2): Phuntikaphadr V. Effect of direct adhessive restoration on cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars. [Thesis]. [S.L]: Mahidal University; 2004, Hilton TJ, Broom JC. Direct posterior static restoration. In: Summitt. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistery. 3 rd ed. USA: Quintessence; 2006, Burke FJT. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro. J Dent June; 20(3): Assif D, Nissan J, Gafni Y, Gordon M. Assessment of the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated molars restored with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent. 2003May; 55(2): Ortega VL, Pegoraro LF, Conti PCR, Dovalle AL, Bonfante G. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with seromer with heat-pressed ceramic inleys and fixed with dual resin cements. J Oral Rahabil Apr; 31(4): Soares Carlos Joes, Marcondes martins luis roberto, fonseca rodrige borges, Correr-sobrinho lourenco, fernandesneto alferedo julio. The influence of cavity preparation design = 0C A Z. A 6 \ # $ PJQ / < 5_ u4.?, 4 >* I = 52B =*0"!A K # MOD / C A # 0 Z 6 %\ 52 B, -. 1 /\ %# 0C A! Z 6 5?2 /9J ^.0 Z. 0C A Z on fracture resistance of posterior leucite-reinforced ceramic restoration. J Prosthet Dent June; 95(6): Bitter K, Meyer-LH, Fotiadis N, Blunch U, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM, et al. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Inter Endod J June;43(6): Alavi AA, Zahedi S. Evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth restored with three types of tooth colored onlay. J Mashhad Dent School. 2006; 30(3-4): Burke F, Wilson N, Watts D. the effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int Dec; 24(12): Mohammadi N, Abed Kahnamoii M, Karimi Yegane P, Jafari Navamipour E. Effect of Fiber Post and Cusp Coverage on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Directly Restorated with Composite Resin. J Endod Oct; 35(10): Mondelli R, Francisro L, Ishikiriama S, Kiyoshi F, Otavio De O, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakend teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage. J Applied Oral Sci June; 17(3): Shor A, Nicholls JJ, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Fatiguemload of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inleynin MOD cl II cavity preparation. Int J Prosthod Jan-Feb; 16(1): Eakle WS, Maxweel EH, Braly BU. Fracture of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Asso. 1986; 112(1): Lina Chun-Li, Changb Yen-Hsiang, Liuc Perng-Ru. Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replasing adhesive premolar restoration: A finite element study. J Dent Mar; 36(3): Santiago LC, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G. Influence of different metal restoration with resin on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Prosthet Dent Apr; 77(4):

6 293 -,-,. /0* *"+ 20. Hanning C, Westphal Ch, Becker K. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inleys. J Prosthet Dent Oct; 94(4): Kuijsa RH, Fennisb WMM, Kreulenb CM, Roestersa FJM, Verdonschotc N, Creugersb NHJ. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restoration. J Dent Jan; 34(1): Hood J. Biomechanism of the intact, prepared and restored tooth. Int Dent J Feb; 41(1): Soares Carlos Joes, Soares Paulo Vinicius, Santos-filbo Paulo Cesar De Freitas, Castero Carolina Guimaraes, Magalbaes Denildo, Versluis Antbeunis. The Influence of Cavity Design and Glass Fiber Post on Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Premolars. J Endod Aug; 34(8): Ghavamnasiri M, Hosseini A, Aghili yeganeh F. Assessment of fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars, Beheshti Uni Dent J. 2006; 24(3):

RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE 6-MONTH RESULTS

RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT AND INDIRECT COMPOSITE 6-MONTH RESULTS ISS: 1312-773X (Online) http://dx.doi.org/1.5272/jimab.3194.396 Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) 3, vol. 19, issue 4 RESTORATIO OF EDODOTICALLY TREATED POSTERIOR TEETH WITH DIRECT