Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
|
|
- Stephen Caldwell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GLAXO GROUP LIMITED and GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE (UK IP LIMITED, v. PERRIGO COMPANY, Plaintiffs, Defendant. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Glaxo Group Limited and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (UK IP Limited, as and for their Complaint against defendant Perrigo Company ( Perrigo, allege as follows: PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff Glaxo Group Limited ( GGL is a private company, limited by shares, organized under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business located at 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, England. 2. Plaintiff GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (UK IP Limited ( GSKCH is a private company, limited by shares, organized under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business located at 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, England. GGL and GSKCH will be referred to collectively as GSK. GGL and GSKCH are members of the GSK group of companies.
2 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 2 3. Upon information and belief, defendant Perrigo Company ( Perrigo is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, with its principal place of business located at 515 Eastern Avenue, Allegan, Michigan. 4. This is a civil action for trademark infringement, unfair competition and dilution in violation of 32(1, 43(a(1(A and 43(c of the U.S. Trademark Act of 1946, as amended (the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1, 1125(a(1(A and 1125(c; and for trademark infringement, unfair competition and dilution under the laws of the State of Texas. 5. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 1338 and has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a. 6. Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Perrigo because it has committed tortious acts and caused injury as described herein in the State of Texas, and has engaged in and transacted business in the State of Texas by shipping into the State the infringing and diluting products described herein. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b. GSK AND ITS FLONASE TRADEMARK 7. The GSK group of companies is among the world s largest pharmaceutical companies, with origins dating back to 1715 in England and 1830 in the U.S. Headquartered in the United Kingdom, the group's U.S. predecessors include SmithKline Beecham, which merged with Glaxo Wellcome plc to form the current GSK group of companies in The GSK group produces and markets a broad range of pharmaceutical, vaccines and consumer healthcare products around the world. Among the GSK group of companies better-known respiratory pharmaceutical brands sold in the U.S. are ADVAIR, BREO, FLOVENT, VERAMYST and, relevant to this case, FLONASE allergy relief products. 2
3 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 3 8. Products sold under the FLONASE trademark are corticosteroids used most often to treat nasal allergies, asthma and other respiratory diseases. FLONASE is the product of many years of research, and the product was launched in the U.S. in From the time of its introduction in this country until early 2015, FLONASE was available only by prescription, and more than 112 million prescriptions were written for FLONASE during this period. In 2014, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration approved the sale of FLONASE as an over-thecounter ( OTC product, and OTC sales began in early From inception through the end of 2015, sales of FLONASE in the U.S. have exceeded $6 billion cumulatively. In 2015 alone, OTC sales of FLONASE exceeded $330 million wholesale. FLONASE has been the subject of extensive advertising and promotion from the time of launch through the present, in the form of print, television, electronic and digital communications. Since 1994, GSK has spent substantial sums on the advertising and promotion of FLONASE, including more than $100 million in the last year alone. Since its launch in early 2015, the FLONASE OTC product has achieved a market share of 11.6% of the total adult allergy OTC product category by dollar sales. 10. The FLONASE trademark was registered with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (the PTO on January 3, 1995 for pharmaceutical preparations and substances for the treatment and/or alleviation of respiratory diseases as U.S. Reg. No. 1,870,977. A copy of the certificate of registration issued to GGL by the PTO for FLONASE is attached as Exhibit 1. This registration remains valid and subsisting, and it has become incontestable under 15 U.S.C Since its launch as an OTC product in early 2015, FLONASE has been packaged in a distinctive, non-functional trade dress that is depicted in Exhibit 2 hereto (the FLONASE Trade Dress. The FLONASE Trade Dress consists of: (i a rectangular package; 3
4 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 4 (ii featuring the dominant colors white and green; (iii an arrangement of six multicolored, geometric shapes, within which appear symbols of allergens that FLONASE is designed to treat; (iv the FLONASE spray bottle with its elongated green cap. Tens of millions of units of products packaged in the FLONASE Trade Dress have been sold over the past year at such wellknown retail chains as Wal-Mart, Target, Walgreen s, CVS, Costco, Rite Aid and others. The FLONASE Trade Dress has been featured regularly in advertising and promotional materials for FLONASE, as shown in the representative point of sale materials, advertisements and related materials attached collectively as Exhibit 3 hereto. 12. As a result of the extensive sales, advertising, marketing and promotion of products sold under the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress in both the U.S. and the State of Texas, the inherently distinctive trademark and Trade Dress have become famous, and consumers in the U.S. generally and Texas specifically associate both the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress exclusively with GSK and view such trademark and Trade Dress as designating the source of GSK s FLONASE products. The goodwill inherent in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress is of substantial value to GSK. PERRIGO AND ITS INFRINGING AND DILUTING NASOFLOW PRODUCTS 13. Upon information and belief, Perrigo is a supplier of, among other things, overthe-counter pharmaceutical products that are intended to replicate either the formulas or active ingredients of leading national brands. Such products are, upon information and belief, often sold by Perrigo to retailers for sale to consumers as private label versions of such national brands. Many national retailers offer private label versions of leading national brands that bear the retailers house trademark, and consumers are often invited to compare the private label product to the national brand to which it corresponds. 4
5 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: Upon information and belief, Perrigo has, within the last several weeks, begun selling to retailers private label versions of FLONASE under the trademark NASOFLOW, a designation that is intended to imitate the FLONASE trademark (the NASOFLOW Products. Unlike many private label products that either lack a brand name, or that use the retailer's house mark as the brand name, NASOFLOW is intended to and does function as the brand name of Perrigo's private label products. The NASOFLOW trademark is strikingly similar visually and aurally to the FLONASE trademark. Indeed, NASOFLOW is essentially the inversion of the two syllables used in FLONASE. Given the substantial similarities between FLONASE and NASOFLOW, consumers are likely to confuse them as to source, sponsorship and/or affiliation. 15. In addition, the NASOFLOW Products being marketed by Perrigo use a trade dress incorporating a combination of elements taken from the FLONASE Trade Dress, including: (i an arrangement of five multicolored, geometric shapes, within which appear symbols designed to connote allergens the Perrigo product aims to treat; and (ii a dominant green packaging (the NASOFLOW Trade Dress. Images of the NASOFLOW Trade Dress appear in Exhibit 4 hereto. 16. Upon information and belief, Perrigo, in common with the rest of the trade and public, is well aware of both the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress, and of the goodwill represented and symbolized thereby. Notwithstanding said awareness, and in fact by reason of same, Perrigo has knowingly distributed, offered for sale and/or sold in commerce in the United States, including within this District, products that bear the confusingly similar and diluting NASOFLOW trademark and the confusingly similar and diluting NASOFLOW Trade Dress. 5
6 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: Such use of the NASOFLOW trademark and NASOFLOW Trade Dress is intended to, and is likely to, cause confusion, mistake or deception of the trade and public, and to cause them to believe falsely that Perrigo s products sold under such mark and using such trade dress are authorized, sponsored or approved by GSK or are otherwise associated, affiliated or connected with GSK and/or GSK s FLONASE products and FLONASE Trade Dress, and to dilute the distinctive quality of such trademark and Trade Dress. 18. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress, and said acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. 19. GSK has no adequate remedy at law and has suffered and will continue to suffer damage as a result of Perrigo s use of the NASOFLOW trademark and NASOFLOW Trade Dress. COUNT I FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 20. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 19 as if fully set forth herein. 21. Perrigo s conduct constitutes trademark infringement of GSK s Registration No. 1,870,977 in violation of Section 32(1 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114( Perrigo s unlawful conduct is willful. 23. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 24. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. 6
7 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 7 COUNT II FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION 25. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 24 as if fully set forth herein. 26. Perrigo s conduct constitutes unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a(1(A of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a(1(A. 27. Perrigo s unlawful conduct is willful. 28. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 29. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. COUNT III COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 30. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 29 as if fully set forth herein. 31. Perrigo s actions constitute infringement of GSK s rights in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress in violation of Texas common law. 32. Perrigo s infringement is intentional and willful. 33. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 34. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. 7
8 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 8 COUNT IV COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION 35. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 34 as if fully set forth herein. 36. Perrigo s actions constitute unfair competition in violation of Texas common law. 37. Perrigo s acts of unfair competition are intentional and willful. 38. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 39. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark and FLONASE Trade Dress, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. COUNT V FEDERAL DILUTION 40. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 39 as if fully set forth herein. 41. Perrigo s conduct constitutes dilution in violation of Section 43(c of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c. 42. Perrigo s unlawful conduct is willful. 43. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 44. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. 8
9 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 9 COUNT VI VIOLATION OF THE TEXAS ANTI-DILUTION STATUTE 45. GSK repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 44 as if fully set forth herein. 46. Perrigo s actions are likely to improperly dilute the value of GSK s distinctive FLONASE trademark in violation of V.T.C.A Perrigo s unlawful conduct is willful. 48. As a result of Perrigo s conduct, GSK has suffered and will continue to suffer 49. Perrigo s activities have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm to GSK and to the substantial goodwill embodied in the FLONASE trademark, and such acts will continue unless restrained by this Court. WHEREFORE, GSK prays for a judgment: 1. Preliminarily and then permanently enjoining and restraining Perrigo, its officers, agents, servants, employees, licensees, distributors, attorneys, corporate affiliates, successors and assigns, and/or all persons or entities acting in concert or participation with them, or any of them, from the advertising, promotion, marketing, offering to sell or selling of goods using: (i the FLONASE trademark or any variation thereof, including but not limited to the NASOFLOW designation; (ii the NASOFLOW Trade Dress depicted in Exhibit 4 hereto, or any variation thereof; and (iii any other false designation of origin or false description or representation or any other thing calculated or likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the trade or public or to deceive the trade or public into believing that Perrigo s business or goods are in any way associated or affiliated with or related to GSK, GSK s FLONASE products, or to dilute the distinctive quality of the FLONASE trademark; 9
10 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: Directing Perrigo to deliver up for destruction or other disposition, within thirty (30 days of the entry of final judgment herein, any and all merchandise, packaging, labels, stationery, advertising and other materials in its possession, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other format, that bear any trademark or designation in violation of GSK s rights as decreed herein; 3. Directing Perrigo to file with the Court and serve on counsel for GSK, within (30 thirty days after entry of any injunction issued by the Court in this action, a sworn written statement as provided in 15 U.S.C. 1116; 4. Directing Perrigo to account to GSK for its profits arising from the conduct complained of herein, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117; 5. Awarding GSK damages in an amount to be determined at trial; 6. Awarding GSK exemplary damages for Perrigo s willful and intentional infringement of GSK s common law trademark rights and for Perrigo s willful and intentional acts of common law unfair competition. 7. Awarding GSK its reasonable attorneys fees, taxable costs and disbursements of this action, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117; and 8. Awarding GSK such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. triable. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all of its claims and any other matters so 10
11 Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 11 Date: February 29, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, By /s/ John M. Cone John M. Cone jcone@dallasbusinesslaw.com FERGUSON, BRASWELL & FRASER, PC 2500 Dallas Parkway, No. 501 Plano, Texas Tel. ( Bruce R. Ewing (pro hac vice admission pending ewing.bruce@dorsey.com DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 51 West 52 nd Street New York, New York Tel Attorneys for Plaintiffs Glaxo Group Limited and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare (UK IP Limited 11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ULTRATEC, INC. and CAPTEL, INC., v. Plaintiffs, SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and CAPTIONCALL, LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No.: 14-cv-66
More informationCase 1:09-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1
Case 1:09-cv-04115-RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 John E. Flaherty Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-4096
More informationCase 2:15-cv SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246
Case 2:15-cv-08180-SRC-CLW Document 9 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 246 Elvin Esteves Charles H. Chevalier J. Brugh Lower GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102 Tel: (973) 596-4500
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case :-cv-00-spl Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Daniel L. Miranda, Esq. SBN 0 MIRANDA LAW FIRM E. Ray Road, Suite #0 Gilbert, AZ Tel: (0) - dan@mirandalawpc.com Robert Tauler, Esq. SBN, (pro hac vice forthcoming)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.
Civil Action No: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION a Colorado Corporation Plaintiff, v. PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC., a Colorado Corporation Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
DR. DAVID D. D ALISE, DDS, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION v. Plaintiff, STRAUMANN USA, LLC, STRAUMANN MANUFACTURING, INC., and STRAUMANN HOLDING
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00159-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/14/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PFIZER INC., PF PRISM C.V., and C.P. PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL
More informationCase 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21
Case 5:15-cv-00510 Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 21 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION MISSION PHARMACAL COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. Case No.
More informationCase 1:19-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:19-cv-00567-UNA Document 1 Filed 03/26/19 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CAREDX, INC. and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 199-mc-09999 Document 654 Filed 11/09/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID # 61421 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMA
More informationMOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Express Scripts, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationCase 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)
Case :-cv-0-kjm-ggh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of PAUL W. REIDL (State Bar No. ) Law Office of Paul W. Reidl Eagle Trace Drive Half Moon Bay, CA 0 Telephone: (0) 0-0 Email: paul@reidllaw.com Attorney for
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-00289-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, MITSUBISHI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
DENTSPLY SIRONA INC. and TULSA DENTAL PRODUCTS LLC d/b/a DENTSPLY SIRONA ENDODONTICS, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO V. EDGE ENDO, LLC, 1:17-cv-1041 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-1322 COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1 1 1 1 John B. Sganga, Jr. (SBN 1,1 john.sganga@knobbe.com Sheila N. Swaroop (SBN, sheila.swaroop@knobbe.com Baraa Kahf (SBN 1,1 baraa.kahf@knobbe.com Marissa Calcagno (SBN, marissa.calcagno@knobbe.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Scott D. Eads, OSB #910400 Email: seads@schwabe.com Nicholas F. Aldrich, Jr., OSB #160306 Email: naldrich@schwabe.com Facsimile: 503.796.2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff AgaMatrix, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 1:17-cv-00939 ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC, Plaintiff, v. No. MICHIGAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA SYKES and SETH SYKES, : CIVIL ACTION Individually and as Parents and Natural : Guardians of WESLEY ALEXANDER : NO. SYKES,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-djh Document Filed // Page of 0 FREDENBERG BEAMS Daniel E. Fredenberg 00 Christian C. M. Beams 0 N. th Street, Suite 0 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: 0/- Email: dfredenberg@fblegalgroup.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MISSION HOSPITAL, INC., Defendant. Civil Action
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 ANDREA SCHMITT, on her own behalf, and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals,
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-01011-UNA Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ONYX THERAPEUTICS, INC., v. Plaintiff, DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case 4:08-cv-01915-TCM Document 48 Filed 04/28/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Cause No.: 4:08-cv-1915 ) WALGREEN
More informationPlaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION
JEFFERSON COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF COLORADO Address: 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 Telephone: (303) 271-6145 Plaintiff: COMFORT DENTAL GROUP, INC., a Colorado Corporation,
More informationCase 1:15-cv ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendant. COMPLAINT
Case 1:15-cv-05526-ARR-VVP Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:14-cv-02873 Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TROYLYNN MORRIS CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF Q. B. SECTION:
More informationCIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT
CIGARETTE FIRE SAFETY AND FIREFIGHTER PROTECTION ACT Act of Jul. 4, 2008, P.L. 518, No. 42 Cl. 35 AN ACT Providing for testing standards for cigarette fire safety, for certification of compliance by manufacturers,
More informationAssociates, llc, for its Complaint against the defendants, Gary K. DeJohn, Sr. and DeJohn
DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521 DATE FILED: November 10, 2017 12:55 PM FILING ID: FF4949B297BB2 (970) 494-3500 CASE NUMBER: 2017CV30947 Plaintiff:
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 E.S., by and through her parents, R.S. and J.S., and JODI STERNOFF, both on their own
More informationCase 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:15-cv-00270-RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-00270 GEORGE BACA, v. Plaintiff, PARKVIEW
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SCOTT RODRIGUES ) Plaintiff ) C.A. 07-10104-GAO ) v. ) ) THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC ) Defendant ) AMENDED COMPLAINT and jury trial demand Introduction
More informationCase 2:09-cv DMC-CCC Document 1 Filed 03/20/2009 Page 1 of 95. Of Counsel:
Case 2:09-cv-01302-DMC-CCC Document 1 Filed 03/20/2009 Page 1 of 95 Charles M. Lizza William C. Baton SAUL EWING LLP One Riverfront Plaza Newark, NJ 07102 (973) 286-6700 clizza@saul.com Attorneys for Plaintiff
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. COME NOW Plaintiffs by and through their attorneys of record J.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 1 1 1 1 1 1 WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, a Washington corporation, JOSEPH O. GEHRETT, JR. M.D., BARBARA K. GEHRETT, M.D., MICHAEL J. KELLY,
More informationINGHAM COUNTY. Effective January 1, 2016 as amended November 10, 2015
INGHAM COUNTY REGULATION TO REQUIRE A LICENSE FOR THE RETAIL SALE OF ELECTROINC SMOKING DEVICES, PROHIBIT SALE OF ELECTROINC SMOKING DEVICESTO MINORS, AND TO RESTRICT LOCATION OF ELECTROINC SMOKING DEVICES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION
WHITE O'CONNOR CURRY GATTI & AVANZADO LLP Andrew M. White (State Bar No. 60181) Melvin N.A. Avanzado (State Bar No. 137127) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard Twenty-Third Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4008
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and
FILED FEB PM 1: 1 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --0-1 SEA SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY TAMMIE AUST, an individual; ALISON GRENNAN, an individual; JENNIFER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION 9500 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44195 and CLEVELAND HEARTLAB, INC., 6701 Carnegie
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 26
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP Saul Perloff California Bar No. 0 saul.perloff@nortonrosefulbright.com 00 Convent Street, Suite 00 San Antonio, Texas - Telephone
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/28/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JARVIK HEART, INC., -against- Plaintiff, CALON CARDIO-TECHNOLOGY LTD., STUART MCCONCHIE, JOHN TEAL and ALANI INTINTOLO Defendant. SUMMONS Index
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JENNY YOO COLLECTION, INC., a New York corporation, Plaintiff, WATTERS DESIGNS, INC., DBA WATTERS & WATTERS, a Texas corporation;
More informationRe: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing for its Men s Multis for prevention of cancer
June 18, 2009 VIA REGULAR MAIL AND FAX TO 973-254-4853 Gary S. Balkema, President Consumer Care Division Bayer HealthCare LLC 36 Columbia Rd Morristown, NJ 07962-1910 Re: Bayer s false and deceptive marketing
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-12194 Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON DIVISION CARIS MPI, INC., Plaintiff, C.A. No. 1:17-CV-12194 v. FOUNDATION
More informationCHAPTER 86. AN ACT concerning reduced cigarette ignition propensity and supplementing Title 54 of the Revised Statutes.
CHAPTER 86 AN ACT concerning reduced cigarette ignition propensity and supplementing Title 54 of the Revised Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: C.54:40A-54
More informationCase 1:12-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:12-cv-02718-RDB Document 1 Filed 09/11/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NORTHERN DIVISION MICHELLE NEMPHOS AS Legal Guardian for C.G.N. A Minor under
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INFORMATION. General Allegations. A. Introduction and Background
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. MOHAMED BASEL ASWAD, M.D., Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. 21 U.S.C. 331(a and 333(a(1: Introduction
More information4. Together, defendants CCA and CCC represent the vast majority of chiropractors practicing in Connecticut.
RETURN DATE JULY 6, 2010 VICTIMS OF CHIROPRACTIC ABUSE, LLC, J.D. OF HARTFORD Plaintiff, at HARTFORD v. CONNECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION, INC.; CONNECTICUT CHIROPRACTIC COUNCIL, INC., Defendants JUNE
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:18-cv-00863 Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 23 LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC C.K. Lee (CL 4086) Anne Seelig (AS 3976) 30 East 39th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel.: 212-465-1188 Fax:
More informationCircuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 6, 1880.
688 v.1, no.9-44 CARROLL V. ERTHEILER.* Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 6, 1880. TRADE-MARK NAME INFRINGEMENT. Where the dominating characteristic of a trade-mark is a name by which the manufacturer
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS
NON-PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER CERTIFICATION FOR LISTING ON OREGON DIRECTORY GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS Who is required to file this Certification? Any tobacco product manufacturer who is a non-participating
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:14-cv-08005 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/14/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SEAN PORTER, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14 cv ( ) Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE CITY OF NEW YORK, -against- Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14 cv ( )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT
Case: 3:11-cv-00622 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/08/11 Page 1 of 10 K.J., a minor, by and through her mother CARAN BRAUN, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN vs. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL NO. UCB, INC., Defendant. VIOLATION 21 U.S.C. 331(k), 352(f)(1), and 333(a)(1) (Causing drugs to be
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:
Case :-cv-00-ben-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 THE LAW OFFICE OF PAUL K. JOSEPH, PC PAUL K. JOSEPH (SBN 0) paul@pauljosephlaw.com W. Pt. Loma Blvd., No. 0 San Diego, CA 0 Phone: () -0 Fax:
More informationCHAPTER Council Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1167
CHAPTER 2008-129 Council Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1167 An act relating to the Reduced Cigarette Ignition Propensity Standard and Firefighter Protection Act; creating s. 633.042,
More informationRe: Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Tobacco Act and the Non-smokers Health Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
655 Third Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10017-5646, USA t: +1-212-642-1776 f: +1-212-768-7796 inta.org esanzdeacedo@inta.org The Honorable Kelvin Kenneth Ogilvie Chair Standing Committee on Social Affairs,
More informationCase 3:16-cv PK Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-00-pk Document Filed 0// Page of Kevin P. Sullivan, OSB # Sullivan Law Firm 0 Fifth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, Washington 0 Telephone: ( 0-00 Facsimile: ( - K.Sullivan@SullivanLawFirm.org 0 VALERIE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-03675-WBH Document 14 Filed 01/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationBritish American Tobacco Snus Marketing Standards
British American Tobacco Snus Marketing Standards British American Tobacco p.l.c. believes there is sufficient scientific evidence to support a less restrictive regime for the advertising and promotion
More informationCase3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed01/21/15 Page1 of 21
Case:-cv-00-JCS Document Filed0// Page of 0 BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT, P.C. ELAINE A. RYAN (To be Admitted Pro Hac Vice) PATRICIA N. SYVERSON (CA SBN 0) LINDSEY M. GOMEZ-GRAY (To be Admitted
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-02167 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MARY ELLIS, JULIA JACOBUS, THERESA KURDT, and LOUETTA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-cab-rbb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 CARPENTER LAW GROUP Todd D. Carpenter (CA ) 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone:.. Facsimile:.. todd@carpenterlawyers.com PATTERSON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA KENNETH KNIGHT IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Between: KENNETH KNIGHT Plaintiff AND: IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED Defendant Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996,
More informationCase 1:17-cv RDM Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00872-RDM Document 1 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 14 BENJAMIN J. VERNIA D.C. BAR NO. 44128 THE VERNIA LAW FIRM 1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004 TEL. (202 349-4053
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBVIE INC. and ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LTD, v. Plaintiffs, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SNYDERS HEART VALVE LLC, Plaintiff, v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, CARDIOLOGY DIVISION INC.; AND ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC.,
More informationBret J. Danow. Partner New York p Practices. Industries. Recognition. Advisories. Articles.
Bret J. Danow Partner bret.danow@kattenlaw.com New York p +1.212.940.6365 Practices FOCUS: Intellectual Property Advertising, Marketing and Promotions Trademark Licensing and Strategy Intellectual Property
More informationCase 3:14-cv JM-WVG Document 1 Filed 11/03/14 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jm-wvg Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 0 CARPENTER LAW GROUP Todd D. Carpenter (CA ) 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone:.. Facsimile:.. todd@carpenterlawyers.com PATTERSON
More informationCase 1:16-cv SEH Document 1 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 12
Case :-cv-00-seh Document Filed 0// Page of James D. Weakley, Esq. Bar No. 0 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 0 East Shaw Avenue, Suite Fresno, California 0 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Jim@walaw-fresno.com Attorneys
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Stephen Charles McArthur (Bar No. ) stephen@smcarthurlaw.com The McArthur Law Firm PC 000 National Blvd. # Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile:
More informationCase 1:13-cv RBK-KMW Document 1 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-06627-RBK-KMW Document 1 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOHN J. GROSS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
More informationTrademark Use Guidelines for Certified Products and Related Advertising
Trademark Use Guidelines for Certified Products and Related Advertising Version 2.0. Updated March 2017 2017 CSA Group 1 Introduction CSA Group has developed a significant reputation and goodwill in its
More informationCase 0:15-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:15-cv-60246-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GEORGE J. MARSHALL and SCOTT DAHLIN, individually and on behalf
More informationCase 2:15-cv RWS Document 6 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 80
Case 2:15-cv-01652-RWS Document 6 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 80 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ERCHONIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CHROMOGENEX
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:17-cv-03314 Document 1 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 24 LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC C.K. Lee (CL 4086) Anne Seelig (AS 3976) 30 East 39th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel.: 212-465-1188 Fax:
More informationMARKETING STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP
MARKETING STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP The Vapor Technology Association (VTA) is a leading national trade association in the electronic cigarette and vapor product industry. VTA represents the manufacturers,
More informationCase 2:12-cv LRH-GWF Document 1 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 26
Case :-cv-0-lrh-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of South th Street Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 0 Tel: (0) - Fax: (0) - 0 COMP PUOY K. PREMSRIRUT, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 00 S. Fourth Street, Second Floor Las
More informationCase 4:15-cv BRW Document 1 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Case 4:15-cv-00284-BRW Document 1 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CORY COX AND JILL COX, EACH INDIVIDUALLY and ON BEHALF OF
More informationSENATE, No. 359 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 0 SESSION Sponsored by: Senator RICHARD J. CODEY District (Essex and Morris) Senator JOSEPH F. VITALE District (Middlesex)
More informationCase: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1
Case: 5:15-cr-00087-DCR-REW Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/01/15 Page: 1 of 15 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION LEXINGTON EastemDistr1ot
More informationCase 2:14-cv RGK-FFM Document 17 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 Page ID #:90
Case :-cv-0-rgk-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 Adam R. Fox (State Bar No. ) Adam.Fox@squiresanders.com Emily L. Wallerstein (State Bar No. 0) Emily.Wallerstein@squiresanders.com Los Angeles,
More informationROSS I POLLAK M J 2016 JUN 13 AM 9: 3. -against- (fka TAKEDA SAN DIEGO INC.); MCKESSON CORPORATION, and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA. INC, FILF1.
Case 1:16-cv-02934-ARR-CLP Document 1 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 43 PagelD 1 FILF1.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TERRY BUZBEE, X 2016 JUN 13 AM 9: 3 U.S. EAfl-173:: Li, Jr -against-
More informationCase 1:15-md FDS Document 255 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-md-02657-FDS Document 255 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) IN RE: ZOFRAN (ONDANSETRON) ) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) MDL No. 1:15-md-2657-FDS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ALMHA LLC Plaintiff, v. SPECIALTY SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT This is an action
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #: 1
Case 1:17-cv-01004 Document 1 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 32 PageID #: 1 LEE LITIGATION GROUP, PLLC C.K. Lee (CL 4086) Anne Seelig (AS 3976) 30 East 39th Street, Second Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel.: 212-465-1188
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.
Case :-cv-000-gpc-bgs Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of Robert Tauler (SBN ) Leticia Kimble (SBN 0) Tauler Smith LLP Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 Tel: () - rtauler@taulersmith.com
More informationMUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE
O-17-23 05/17/17 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, CHAPTER 6, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BE IT ORDAINED, by
More informationPresentation: Philip G. Hampton, II Haynes and Boone, LLP (202) September 14, 2017
Presentation: Philip G. Hampton, II Haynes and Boone, LLP (202) 654-4533 September 14, 2017 What is a Trademark? A trademark is any word, product name, symbol or device that identifies the goods or services
More informationUse of Light, Mild, Low, or Similar Descriptors in the Label, Labeling, or Advertising of Tobacco Products
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Use of Light, Mild, Low, or Similar Descriptors in the Label, Labeling, or Advertising of Tobacco Products June 2010 For questions regarding this guidance, contact the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHANNON MAHONEY, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly CASE NO. 15 Civ. 9841 situated, Plaintiff, v. CLASS ACTION ENDO
More informationWESTUE RSDDISSTTRRI CTTCAORUKRATN sas
Case 3:14-cv-03025-PKH Document 1 Filed 03/07/14 Page 1 of 26 PagelD 1 CHRISTOL HUTCHISON WESTUE RSDDISSTTRRI CTTCAORUKRATN sas FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR 0 7 2014 WESTERN DISTRICT OF
More information51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013
SENATE BILL ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 0 INTRODUCED BY Peter Wirth 0 AN ACT RELATING TO COMMERCE; AMENDING AND ENACTING SECTIONS OF THE NEW MEXICO FOOD ACT AND THE COMMERCIAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY THOMAS MOORS, on behalf of himself, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No:
Case:-cv-00-DMR Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON, APLC RONALD A. MARRON (0) ron@consumersadvocates.com SKYE RESENDES () skye@consumersadvocates.com Arroyo Drive San Diego, CA
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO COMPLAINT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO NOTTINGHAM-SPIRK PARTNERS, LLC, 2200 Overlook Road, Cleveland, OH 44106, and NOTTINGHAM-SPIRK DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC., 2200 Overlook Road, Cleveland,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) Case No.
PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. Plaintiff, GW PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, JUSTIN D. GOVER, and ADAM
More informationCITY OF PALMER, ALASKA. Ordinance No
Initiative Petition Submitted to City Clerk: July 3, 2012 Petition Certified by City Clerk: July 6, 2012 Measure Placed Before the Voters at the Regular Election of: October 2, 2012 Proposition No. 3,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-rgk-sh Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 Rosemary Rivas (State Bar. No. 0) rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California
More information4:18-cv AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21
4:18-cv-01963-AMQ Date Filed 07/17/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 21 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Scott Vanderstelt and Vandy Vanderstelt, on behalf
More information