HARM. Definition modified from the IHI definition of Harm by the QUEST Harm Workgroup
|
|
- Rhoda Miles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Indonesia Clinical epidemiology and Evidence Based Medicine (ICE(ICE-EBM) HARM Jarir At Thobari (FK UGM)
2 Efficacious Medical intervention Harm
3 HARM Unintended physical injury resulting from or contributed to by medical care, that requires additional monitoring, treatment or hospitalization, or that results in death which is hospital acquired. Definition modified from the IHI definition of Harm by the QUEST Harm Workgroup
4 Harm Do oral contraceptives cause breast cancer? Do calcium antagonists increase the risk of death or cancer? Do vasectomies increase the risk of prostate cancer? Does Rosiglitazone cause myocardial infaction?
5 Summary estimates of risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women and women younger than 50 years associated with ever use of oral contraceptives Kahlenborn C et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:
6 Risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women and women younger than 50 years associated with ever use of oral contraceptives Meta analysis OR=1.19; 95% CI, Parous OR=1.29; 95% CI: Nulliparous OR=1.24; 95% CI: Parous women, OCs were used Before FFTP* OR=1.44 ( ) after FFTP OR=1.15 ( ) used OCs 4 or more years before FFTP (OR=1.52 ( ). *first full-term pregnancy Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(10):
7 Primary and Other Outcomes: DREAM Rosiglitazone group (n=2635) Placebo group (n=2634) HR (95% CI) p Cardiovascular events composite* 75 (2.9%) 55 (2.1%) 1.37 ( ) 0.08 Myocardial infarction 15 (0.6%) 9 (0.3%) 1.66 ( ) 0.2 Stroke 7 (0.3%) 5 (0.2%) 1.39 ( ) 0.6 Cardiovascular death 12 (0.5%) 10 (0.4%) 1.20 ( ) 0.7 Confirmed heart failure 14 (0.5%) 2 (0.1%) 7.03 ( ) 0.01 New angina 24 (0.9%) 20 (0.8%) 1.20 ( ) 0.5 Revascularization 35 (1.3%) 27 (1.0%) 1.29 ( ) 0.3 Myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death 32 (1.2%) 23 (0.9%) 1.39 ( ) 0.2 Data are number (%). *Rows are not mutually exclusive for components of the composite if a participant had more than one component of the composite then they are counted in the relevant row. Regression implies achieving a normal fasting glucose concentration (as defined in both rows) and 2-h plasma glucose level. Defined as acute treatment with at least two of the following criteria: typical signs and symptoms, typical radiological evidence, use of diuretics, vasodilators, or inotropes. DREAM investigators. Lancet 2006;368:
8 Adverse Events, Hospitalization, and Death: ADOPT Variable Adverse events number of patients (%) Rosiglitazone (N=1456) Metformin (N=1454) Glyburide (N=1441) Serious Events Total Events Serious Events Total Events Serious Events Total Events Total events 346 (23.8) 1338 (91.9) 331 (22.8) 1341 (92.2) 308 (21.4) 1321 (91.7) Cardiovascular disease 49 (3.4) 62 (4.3) 46 (3.2) 58 (4.0) 26 (1.8) 41 (2.8) Myocardial Infarction Fatal 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 3 (0.2) Nonfatal 22 (1.5) 25 (1.7) 18 (1.2) 21 (1.4) 11 (0.8) 15 (1.0) Congestive heart failure (investigator-reported) 12 (0.8) 22 (1.5) 12 (0.8) 19 (1.3) 3 (0.2) 9 (0.6) Stroke 13 (0.9) 16 (1.1) 17 (1.2) 19 (1.3) 12 (0.8) 17 (1.2) Peripheral vascular disease 7 (0.5) 36 (2.5) 6 (0.4) 27 (1.9) 4 (0.3) 31 (2.2) Gastrointestinal events 8 (0.5) 335 (23.0) 7 (0.5) 557 (38.3) 3 (0.2) 316 (21.9) Death and Hospitalization Hospitalization for any reason Patients no. (%) 169 (11.6) 172 (11.8) 150 (10.4) Events no Deaths from any cause no P<0.05 for the comparison between this treatment group and the rosiglitazone group; P<0.01 for the comparison between this treatment group and the rosiglitazone group. ADOPT study group. N Engl J Med 2006;355:
9 HOME SUBSCRIBE CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES COLLECTIONS HELP Search Term Advanced Search S A correction Search E A R C HNEJM has been published: N Engl J Med 2007;357(1):100. Institution: Syrian Arab Republic Sign In as Individual Contact Subscription Administrator at Your Institution FAQ Volume 356: June 14, 2007 Number 24 Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes Steven E. Nissen, M.D., and Kathy Wolski, M.P.H
10 Meta Analysis: Rates of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes Rosiglitazone Group Control Group Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value no. of events/total no. (%) Myocardial Infarction Small trials combined 44/10,285 (0.43) 22/6106 (0.36) 1.45 ( ) 0.15 DREAM 15/2,635 (0.57) 9/2634 (0.34) 1.65 ( ) 0.22 ADOPT 27/1,456 (1.85) 41/2895 (1.42) 1.33 ( ) 0.27 Overall 1.43 ( ) 0.03 Death from Cardiovascular Causes Small trials combined 25/6,845 (0.36) 7/3980 (0.18) 2.40 ( ) 0.02 DREAM 12/2,635 (0.46) 10/2634 (0.38) 1.20 ( ) 0.67 ADOPT 2/1,456 (0.14) 5/2895 (0.17) 0.80 ( ) 0.78 Overall 1.64 ( ) 0.06 Nissen and Wolski. N Engl J Med 2007;356:
11 Hierarchy of Evidence Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials (Meta-analysis) Single Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Systematic Review of Observational Studies Addressing Patient-Important Outcomes Single Observational Study Addressing Patient-Important Outcomes Physiologic Studies Unsystematic Clinical Observations
12 Level 1a 1b Therapy/Prevention, Aetiology/Harm SR (with homogeneity*) of RCTs Individual RCT (with narrow Confidence Interval ) Prognosis Diagnosis Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence study SR (with homogeneity*) of inception cohort studies; CDR validated in different populations Individual inception cohort study with > 80% follow-up; CDR validated in a single population SR (with homogeneity*) of Level 1 diagnostic studies; CDR with 1b studies from different clinical centres Validating** cohort study with good reference standards; or CDR tested within one clinical centre SR (with homogeneity*) of prospective cohort studies Prospective cohort study with good follow-up**** Economic and decision analyses SR (with homogeneity*) of Level 1 economic studies Analysis based on clinically sensible costs or alternatives; systematic review(s) of the evidence; and including multi-way sensitivity analyses 1c All or none All or none case-series Absolute SpPins and SnNouts All or none case-series Absolute better-value or worse-value analyses 2a 2b 2c SR (with homogeneity*) of cohort studies Individual cohort study (including low quality RCT; e.g., <80% follow-up) "Outcomes" Research; Ecological studies SR (with homogeneity*) of either retrospective cohort studies or untreated control groups in RCTs Retrospective cohort study or follow-up of untreated control patients in an RCT; Derivation of CDR or validated on splitsample only SR (with homogeneity*) of Level >2 diagnostic studies Exploratory** cohort study with good reference standards; CDR after derivation, or validated only on split-sample or databases SR (with homogeneity*) of 2b and better studies Retrospective cohort study, or poor follow-up SR (with homogeneity*) of Level >2 economic studies Analysis based on clinically sensible costs or alternatives; limited review(s) of the evidence, or single studies; and including multi-way sensitivity analyses "Outcomes" Research Ecological studies Audit or outcomes research 3a SR (with homogeneity*) of case-control studies SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies 3b Individual Case-Control Study Non-consecutive study; or without consistently applied reference standards Non-consecutive cohort study, or very limited population Analysis based on limited alternatives or costs, poor quality estimates of data, but including sensitivity analyses incorporating clinically sensible variations. 4 Case-series (and poor quality cohort and casecontrol studies ) Case-series (and poor quality prognostic cohort studies***) Case-control study, poor or nonindependent reference standard Case-series or superseded reference standards Analysis with no sensitivity analysis 5 Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on economic theory or "first principles"
13 Clinical Scenario Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, especially among older people People with osteoarthritis usually have joint pain and limited movement Unlike some other forms of arthritis, osteoarthritis only affects joints, and not internal organs Usually need long-term analgesics Is there any side effects of using long-term analgesics?
14 Clinical Question P I C O Patient and the problem: osteoarthritis Intervention: selective Cox-2 inhibitor (rofecoxib) Comparison: other analgesic and antiinflammatory agents Outcome of interest: congestive heart failure
15 BMJ 2005; 330:1370
16 How to assess HARM? Is there evidence on cause & effect relationship? Valid Importance Direct relevance
17 Establishing Validity
18 1. Were there clearly defined group of patients, similar in all important ways other than exposure to the treatment or other cause? Randomization?? The choice of comparison groups has an enormous influence on the credibility of the results The design of the study determines the comparison groups
19 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Not suitable for harm studies: Unethical Expensive (Rare events, long period of time) Need large samples Some RCTs for therapy might have shown harm unintentionally (stopped)
20 Cohort Studies Prospective, Non-randomized exposure Useful when subjects cannot be assigned to an exposure group Exposed patients might differ from non-exposed for important determinants of outcome (CONFOUNDERS) Investigator must document the characteristics of each group and demonstrate comparability, and use statistical techniques to adjust for known confounders
21 Confounders (Atthobari et al, Nephrol. Dial. Transp 2006; 21: )
22 Case-Control Useful for RARE outcomes that take LONG time to develop Ex: DES and vaginal adenocarcinoma in female Susceptible to unmeasured confounders Retrospective Recall Bias
23
24 Cross Sectional Studies Can be used to study potentially causal relationships between risk factors & outcomes Measure prevalence (not incidence) Exposures (risk factors) and outcomes (disease) are measured simultaneously Temporal relationship is lost
25 Case Series and Case Reports No comparison group! Unusual/dramatic outcome (Phocomelia in offsprings of mothers receiving Thalidomide) Sufficient for hypothesis generation (Need more studies)
26 Design Starting Point Assessment Strengths Weaknesses Cohort Exposure status Outcome event status Feasible when impossible to randomize -Susceptible to bias -Limited validity Case- Control Outcome event status Exposure status -Overcomes temporal delays -May only requires small sample size -Susceptible to bias -Limited validity RCT Exposure status Adverse event status Low susceptibility to bias -Feasibility -Generalizability
27 2. Were treatment/exposures & clinical outcomes measured in the same ways in both groups? (Was the assessment of outcomes either objective or blinded) How was the exposure ascertained? Recall Bias or Interviewer Bias Blinding How was the outcome ascertained? Surveillance Bias Blind Study hypothesis
28 3. Was the follow up of the study patients sufficiently long (for the outcome to occur) and complete? Short term Follow up 20% lost to follow up Long term celecoxib, rofecoxib, NSAID CHF No CHF
29 4. Do the results satisfy some diagnostic tests for causation? CAUSE Temporality Strength of association Biologic Plaucibility Specificity Dose-response Consistency EFFECT Cessation of exposure
30 ARE THE VALID RESULTS OF THIS HARM STUDY IMPORTANT? If the study is valid in showing harm/association, how bad and how accurate is the harm?. In other words What is the magnitude and precision of the association between exposure and outcome?
31 The Estimate of the Magnitude Depends on the Study Design
32 RCT Cohort Incidence or risk Harm No I exp = 20/1000 = 0.02 I Treatment non-exp = 2/1000 = No treatment RR= I exp / I non non-exp exp= 10 Exposed patients are 10 times more likely to suffer from the adverse event than non-exposed
33 ADVERSE OUTCOME CHF No CHF Celecoxib a b EXPOSE TO TREATMENT NSAID c d RR = a / (a+b) c/ (c+d) OR = ad /bc
34 Case-Control Studies Odds Ratio (Relative Odds) Adverse Outcome Present Absent Totals Exposure a b a+b Yes Exposure No Totals c d c+d a+c b+d OR = (a/c)/(b/d) = ad/bc a+b+c+ d
35 Are the Results Important? Case-Control Studies Out of 100 affected cases 90 were exposed to the agent (a) 10 were not exposed (c) Out of 100 non-affected cases (controls) 45 were exposed to the agent (b) 55 were not exposed (d)
36 Case Control Studies Odds Ratio Out of 100 affected cases 90 were exposed 10 were not exposed Out of 100 controls 45 were exposed 55 were not exposed Exposure Yes Exposure No Adverse Outcome Present Absent Totals Totals Odds Ratio: OR = (a/c)/(b/d) = ad/bc = (90x55)/(45x10) = 11 The odds of experiencing the adverse event for patients exposed is 11x that of those unexposed
37 Odds Ratio (OR) OR > 1 represents an increased risk or association Describes the relative harm of an exposure independent of disease prevalence When the prevalence of the outcome of interest is rare in the population from which the sample was drawn (often the reason for using a casecontrol study), the OR closely approximates the RR
38 Criteria to Examine RR & OR Magnitude Cohort and Case-Control are both biased What if RR or OR s value preferable? R.R. > 3 O.R. > 4 Impressive!! Recalculate adjusting for a known confounder, if increased or the same after adjustment more believable If the adjustment results in large decline in RR or OR We should be suspicious of both of them Precision
39 Adjusting for Confounders Assuming the study is attempting to examine the association between SSRIs and Upper GI bleed. 100 cases with GI bleed, 90 were on SSRIs, 100 controls with no GI bleed, 45 were on SSRIs OR = 11 If in the study 7 subjects were also on Ibuproffen (confounder) (2 in the control group one on SSRI, 5 in the cases group 3 on SSRI) You can calculate an adjusted OR
40 Adjusted OR Upper GI Bleed 7 subjects on Ibuproffen 2 in the control group one on SSRI (b) 5 in the cases group 3 on SSRI (a) Exposure Yes Present Absent Totals Exposure No Totals The adjusted OR = ad/bc = (87x54)/(44x8) = 13 What is your conclusion????
41 Criteria to Examine RR and OR Magnitude Precision Is highest when C.I. given is narrow and remains within a clinically important increased risk
42 Examples of C.I. Is There Association?? SSRIs and Upper GI bleed: Adjusted OR 3.0 (95% CI, ) Non-SSRIs and Upper GI bleed: Adjusted OR 1.4 (95% CI, ) NSAIDs and Upper GI bleed: Adjusted OR 3.7 (95% CI, ) SSRIs + NSAIDs and Upper GI bleed: Adjusted OR 15.6 (95% CI ) Long acting Benzodiazepines and risk of fall in elderly patients: RR 2.0 (95% CI ) Calcium channel blockers and MI: OR 1.9 (95% CI )
43 Number Needed to Harm (NNH) The number of patients who, if they received the experimental treatment, would lead to one additional patient being harmed, compared with patients who received the comparison treatment. 1/ARI
44 NNH For RCT and Cohort One way to report the evidence to your patients Same formula as NNT NNH = 1/ARI = 1/ (I exp - I nonexp ) = 1 [a/(a+b)-c/(c+d)] ARI = Absolute Risk Increase
45 Number Needed to Harm (NNH) NNH = a a + b 1 c c + d If OR < 1 If OR > [PEER x (1 - OR)] NNH = (1 - PEER) x PEER x (1 - OR) 1 + [PEER x (OR - 1)] NNH = (1 - PEER) x PEER x (OR - 1)
46 NNH - For Case Control PEER = Patient Expected Event Rate = Adverse event rate in non exposed Table of values available (Do NOT Need to Memorize) Note: For the same OR, NNH can be different for different PEERs: Example: For OR = 0.9 NNH = 2000 for PEER of NNH = 40 for PEER of 0.40
47 Converting OR to NNH For OR greater than PEER Calculator available at:
48 The Flawless Study Flawful A young investigator is designing a case-control study on the association between SSRIs and upper GI bleed. He recruited his cases and controls from a GI clinic. Both cases and controls were interviewed retrospectively for their use of SSRIs. In order to blind himself to the subjects response, interviews were conducted by the clinic nurse who would ask the subjects a set of questions while checking them in for the visit. The investigator reported a RR of 2.5 (95% CI ) and concluded that there is a positive association between SSRIs and upper GI bleed and that 1 in 2-3 patients treated with SSRIs will have an upper GI bleed caused by the medication
49 Study Flaws Controls might have other GI diseases that predisposes them to GI bleed Interviewer not blinded CI wide and lower end < 1 Used RR in a case-control design Interpretation of RR is wrong
50 Summary Harm is unavoidable but can be minimized Every intervention has some degree of harm Criteria for establishing validity in a harm study RCT, while excellent design, might be unethical in harm Cohort/ Case-Control (Rare outcome or outcome that takes long time to develop) Association versus Causation
51 Summary Magnitude: RCT or Cohort RR = I exp /I nonexp = [a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)] Case-Control OR = (a/c)/(b/d) = ad/bc Magnitude: RR or OR > 1 (positive association) Preferable association: (because of confounders) RR > 3 OR > 4 More criteria needed for CAUSATION Adjustment for confounders Precision: C.I. (Narrow and do not straddle 1 ) NNH = 1/ARI = 1/ (I exp - I nonexp )
52 THANK YOU
Health Studies 315. Clinical Epidemiology: Evidence of Risk and Harm
Health Studies 315 Clinical Epidemiology: Evidence of Risk and Harm 1 Patients encounter (possibly) risky exposures Alcohol during pregnancy (fetal risk) Electromagnetic fields (cancer risk) Vasectomy
More informationEvidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Finding and Assessing the Evidence
Find Assess Decide Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Finding and Assessing the Evidence Pieter Vermeersch, M.D. Ph.D. Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven November 18th 2008 Introduction Archie Cochrane (1908-1988)
More informationOxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (May 2001) 38
Annexed Annex 1 Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (May 2001) 38 Level I Therapy /Prevention. Aetiology/Harm Prognosis Diagnosis Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence study
More informationWashington, DC, November 9, 2009 Institute of Medicine
Holger Schünemann, MD, PhD Chair, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics Michael Gent Chair in Healthcare Research McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Washington, DC, November 9, 2009 Institute
More informationINTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY DESIGNS PHUNLERD PIYARAJ, MD., MHS., PHD.
INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY DESIGNS PHUNLERD PIYARAJ, MD., MHS., PHD. 1 OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to: Provide a definition of epidemiology Describe the major types
More informationExample: Treatment Question
Example: Treatment Question EVIDENCE TABLE What: Tabular description of the studies. Compare studies by characteristics. Why: Prevent errors of interpretation. Increase clarity of analysis. Plan a statistical
More informationRapid appraisal of the literature: Identifying study biases
Rapid appraisal of the literature: Identifying study biases Rita Popat, PhD Clinical Assistant Professor Division of Epidemiology Stanford University School of Medicine August 7, 2007 What is critical
More informationOnline Supplementary Material
Section 1. Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale The adaptation consisted of allowing case-control studies to earn a star when the case definition is based on record linkage, to liken the evaluation of case-control
More informationFIRST DO NO HARM: AN EBM ODYSSEY. Cathleen Colón-Emeric, MD, MHS Geriatrics, Department of Medicine Durham VA GRECC
FIRST DO NO HARM: AN EBM ODYSSEY Cathleen Colón-Emeric, MD, MHS Geriatrics, Department of Medicine Durham VA GRECC colon001@mc.duke.edu 919 660-7517 Learning Objectives 1. Describe the types of studies
More informationTHERAPY WORKSHEET: page 1 of 2 adapted from Sackett 1996
THERAPY WORKSHEET: page 1 of 2 adapted from Sackett 1996 Citation: Are the results of this single preventive or therapeutic trial valid? Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomised? -and was
More informationEvidence-Based Medicine Journal Club. A Primer in Statistics, Study Design, and Epidemiology. August, 2013
Evidence-Based Medicine Journal Club A Primer in Statistics, Study Design, and Epidemiology August, 2013 Rationale for EBM Conscientious, explicit, and judicious use Beyond clinical experience and physiologic
More informationGlossary of Practical Epidemiology Concepts
Glossary of Practical Epidemiology Concepts - 2009 Adapted from the McMaster EBCP Workshop 2003, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. Note that open access to the much of the materials used in the Epi-546
More informationOverview of Study Designs in Clinical Research
Overview of Study Designs in Clinical Research Systematic Reviews (SR), Meta-Analysis Best Evidence / Evidence Guidelines + Evidence Summaries Randomized, controlled trials (RCT) Clinical trials, Cohort
More informationStrategies for data analysis: case-control studies
Strategies for data analysis: case-control studies Gilda Piaggio UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction World Health Organization
More informationCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. Evidence-Based Clinical Updates (EBCU s) in Anesthesia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie Evidence-Based Clinical Updates (EBCU s) in Anesthesia INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia considers for publication
More informationRisk Study. Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Definition
Risk Study Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics What is Risk? Definition The probability of some untoward event The likelihood that people who are exposed to certain factors (risk factors)
More informationOutline. What is Evidence-Based Practice? EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE. What EBP is Not:
Evidence Based Practice Primer Outline Evidence Based Practice (EBP) EBP overview and process Formulating clinical questions (PICO) Searching for EB answers Trial design Critical appraisal Assessing the
More informationPurpose. Study Designs. Objectives. Observational Studies. Analytic Studies
Purpose Study Designs H.S. Teitelbaum, DO, PhD, MPH, FAOCOPM AOCOPM Annual Meeting Introduce notions of study design Clarify common terminology used with description and interpretation of information collected
More informationObservational Study Designs. Review. Today. Measures of disease occurrence. Cohort Studies
Observational Study Designs Denise Boudreau, PhD Center for Health Studies Group Health Cooperative Today Review cohort studies Case-control studies Design Identifying cases and controls Measuring exposure
More informationCritical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death. Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto
Critical Appraisal of a Meta-Analysis: Rosiglitazone and CV Death Debra Moy Faculty of Pharmacy University of Toronto Goal To provide practitioners with a systematic approach to evaluating a meta analysis
More informationTrial Designs. Professor Peter Cameron
Trial Designs Professor Peter Cameron OVERVIEW Review of Observational methods Principles of experimental design applied to observational studies Population Selection Looking for bias Inference Analysis
More informationTypes of Biomedical Research
INTRODUCTION & MEASUREMENT IN CLINICAL RESEARCH Sakda Arj Ong Vallipakorn, MD MSIT, MA (Information Science) Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology Emergency Medicine, Ped Emergency Family Medicine Section of
More information12/26/2013. Types of Biomedical Research. Clinical Research. 7Steps to do research INTRODUCTION & MEASUREMENT IN CLINICAL RESEARCH S T A T I S T I C
Types of Biomedical Research INTRODUCTION & MEASUREMENT IN CLINICAL RESEARCH Sakda Arj Ong Vallipakorn, MD MSIT, MA (Information Science) Pediatrics, Pediatric Cardiology Emergency Medicine, Ped Emergency
More informationEpidemiologic Study Designs. (RCTs)
Epidemiologic Study Designs Epidemiologic Study Designs Experimental (RCTs) Observational Analytical Descriptive Case-Control Cohort + cross-sectional & ecologic Epidemiologic Study Designs Descriptive
More informationCARDIOVASCULAR RISK and NSAIDs
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK and NSAIDs Dr. Syed Ghulam Mogni Mowla Assistant Professor of Medicine Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka INTRODUCTION NSAIDs are most commonly prescribed drugs Recent evidence
More informationResearch Methodology Workshop. Study Type
Research Methodology Workshop Study Type What type of question? Frequency: how common is it? Aetiology: What caused this? Intervention: Does this intervention work? Diagnosis or test evaluation: How accurate
More informationGLOSSARY OF GENERAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF GENERAL TERMS Absolute risk reduction Absolute risk reduction (ARR) is the difference between the event rate in the control group (CER) and the event rate in the treated group (EER). ARR =
More informationAppraising the Literature Overview of Study Designs
Chapter 5 Appraising the Literature Overview of Study Designs Barbara M. Sullivan, PhD Department of Research, NUHS Jerrilyn A. Cambron, PhD, DC Department of Researach, NUHS EBP@NUHS Ch 5 - Overview of
More informationRecommendations for RA management: what has changed?
The 2016 Update of the EULAR Recommendations for RA management: what has changed? Baltics Rheumatology Conference Vilnius, September 21-22 Prof. Diego Kyburz University Hospital of Basel Switzerland Multiple
More informationINTERPRETATION OF STUDY FINDINGS: PART I. Julie E. Buring, ScD Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA
INTERPRETATION OF STUDY FINDINGS: PART I Julie E. Buring, ScD Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA Drawing Conclusions TRUTH IN THE UNIVERSE Infer TRUTH IN THE STUDY Infer FINDINGS IN THE STUDY Designing
More informationEpidemiologic study designs
Epidemiologic study designs and critical appraisal of scientific papers Rolf H.H. Groenwold, MD, PhD Bio sketch MD, PhD in epidemiology Associate professor of Epidemiology at UMC Utrecht Research focus
More informationEvidence Based Medicine
Course Goals Goals 1. Understand basic concepts of evidence based medicine (EBM) and how EBM facilitates optimal patient care. 2. Develop a basic understanding of how clinical research studies are designed
More informationStudy Designs in Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, BDS, MPH, DrPH First semester 2017/ 2018 Department of Family and Community Medicine School of Medicine/ The University of Jordan Epidemiologic Study
More informationEvidence Based Medicine
Hamadan University of medical sciences School of Public Health Department of Epidemiology Evidence Based Medicine Amin Doosti-Irani, PhD in Epidemiology 10 March 2017 a_doostiirani@yahoo.com 1 Outlines
More informationMeasures of Association
Measures of Association Lakkana Thaikruea M.D., M.S., Ph.D. Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand Introduction One of epidemiological studies goal is to determine
More informationOral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy
Oral Hypoglycemics and Risk of Adverse Cardiac Events: A Summary of the Controversy Jeffrey Boord, MD, MPH Advances in Cardiovascular Medicine Kingston, Jamaica December 7, 2012 VanderbiltHeart.com Outline
More informationAnalytic Study Design
Analytic Study Design DMID/ICSSC Dar es Salaam, Tanzania January 17-22, 2010 Kenneth F. Schulz, PhD 2001 Harvey Nelson 2002 Alfredo L. Fort Cohort Studies 2002 Kelli M. Donley 1991 Win Morgan/CCP Example
More informationWORKSHEET: Etiology/Harm
Updated 9/10/2013 Name: WORKSHEET: Etiology/Harm Citation: McGregor SE, Courneya KS, Kopciuk KA, Tosevski C, Friedenreich CM. Case control study of lifetime alcohol intake and prostate cancer risk. Cancer
More informationobservational studies Descriptive studies
form one stage within this broader sequence, which begins with laboratory studies using animal models, thence to human testing: Phase I: The new drug or treatment is tested in a small group of people for
More informationSTUDY DESIGNS WHICH ONE IS BEST?
STUDY DESIGNS WHICH ONE IS BEST? David Nunan, PhD Research Fellow and Tutor Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences and Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine University of Oxford Exercise
More informationClinical problems and choice of study designs
Evidence Based Dentistry Clinical problems and choice of study designs Asbjørn Jokstad University of Oslo, Norway Nov 21 2001 1 Manipulation with intervention Yes Experimental study No Non-experimental
More informationUpdates in Therapeutics 2015: The Pharmacotherapy Preparatory Review & Recertification Course
Updates in Therapeutics 2015: The Pharmacotherapy Preparatory Review & Recertification Course Study Designs: Fundamentals and Interpretation Kevin M. Sowinski, Pharm.D., FCCP Purdue University, College
More informationEBM, Study Design and Numbers. David Frankfurter, MD Professor OB/GYN The George Washington University
EBM, Study Design and Numbers David Frankfurter, MD Professor OB/GYN The George Washington University 1978? 1978 Best Picture of 1978 The Deer Hunter Universal Studios The 50th Academy Awards were held
More information115 remained abstinent. 140 remained abstinent. Relapsed Remained abstinent Total
Chapter 10 Exercises 1. Intent-to-treat analysis: Example 1 In a randomized controlled trial to determine whether the nicotine patch reduces the risk of relapse among smokers who have committed to quit,
More informationACR OA Guideline Development Process Knee and Hip
ACR OA Guideline Development Process Knee and Hip 1. Literature searching frame work Literature searches were developed based on the scenarios. A comprehensive search strategy was used to guide the process
More informationBiases in clinical research. Seungho Ryu, MD, PhD Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University
Biases in clinical research Seungho Ryu, MD, PhD Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University Learning objectives Describe the threats to causal inferences in clinical studies Understand the role of
More informationQuantifying the Benefits and Harms of Interventions: Relative vs. Absolute Risk
JOURNAL CLUB LECTURE SERIES: Quantifying the Benefits and Harms of Interventions: Relative vs. Absolute Risk Tuesday, May 12 th, 2015 Anil N. Makam, MD MAS Oanh K. Nguyen, MD MAS Division of General Internal
More informationConfounding and Bias
28 th International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management Barcelona, Spain August 22, 2012 Confounding and Bias Tobias Gerhard, PhD Assistant Professor, Ernest Mario School
More informationIncorporating Clinical Information into the Label
ECC Population Health Group LLC expertise-driven consulting in global maternal-child health & pharmacoepidemiology Incorporating Clinical Information into the Label Labels without Categories: A Workshop
More informationJohn J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam
Latest Insights from the JUPITER Study John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam Inflammation, hscrp, and Vascular Prevention
More informationAssessing Cardiovascular risk in different populations
A-1 Assessing Cardiovascular risk in different populations Murray Stewart (GSK) A-2 Studies with RSG across different risk population Short term studies low risk ADOPT newly diagnosed low risk DREAM IGT
More informationBias. Zuber D. Mulla
Bias Zuber D. Mulla Explanations when you Observe or Don t Observe an Association Truth Chance Bias Confounding From Epidemiology in Medicine (Hennekens & Buring) Bias When you detect an association or
More informationJournal Club Critical Appraisal Worksheets. Dr David Walbridge
Journal Club Critical Appraisal Worksheets Dr David Walbridge The Four Part Question The purpose of a structured EBM question is: To be directly relevant to the clinical situation or problem To express
More informationDisclosure. Learning Objectives 1/17/2018. Pumping the Breaks in Pain Management: An Update on Cardiovascular Risk with NSAID Use
Disclosure Pumping the Breaks in Pain Management: An Update on Cardiovascular Risk with Liz Van Dril, PharmD, BCPS PGY2 Ambulatory Care Resident January 17 th, 2018 Dr. Liz Van Dril has no actual or potential
More informationFirst line treatment of primary hypertension
First line treatment of primary hypertension Dr. Vijaya Musini Assistant Professor, Dept. Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics Manager, Drug Assessment Working Group Therapeutics Initiative Editor,
More informationBias. Sam Bracebridge
Bias Sam Bracebridge Bias Errors in epidemiological measurements Based on the slides of Sam Bracebridge By the end of the lecture fellows will be able to Define bias Identify different types of bias Explain
More informationCONCEPTUALIZING A RESEARCH DESIGN
CONCEPTUALIZING A RESEARCH DESIGN Detty Nurdiati Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology Fac of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, Indonesia Conceptualizing a Research Design The Research Design The
More informationConfounding Bias: Stratification
OUTLINE: Confounding- cont. Generalizability Reproducibility Effect modification Confounding Bias: Stratification Example 1: Association between place of residence & Chronic bronchitis Residence Chronic
More informationFlaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials
Flaws, Bias, Misinterpretation and Fraud in Randomized Clinical Trials Steven E. Nissen MD Chairman, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Disclosure Consulting: Many pharmaceutical companies
More informationCritical Appraisal of Evidence
Critical Appraisal of Evidence A Focus on Intervention/Treatment Studies Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, CPNP/PMHNP, FNAP, FAAN Associate Vice President for Health Promotion University Chief Wellness Officer
More informationAntihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic National Institutes
More informationDECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST Warfarin and the risk of major bleeding events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based study Laurent Azoulay PhD 1,2, Sophie Dell Aniello MSc 1, Teresa
More informationCAN EFFECTIVENESS BE MEASURED OUTSIDE A CLINICAL TRIAL?
CAN EFFECTIVENESS BE MEASURED OUTSIDE A CLINICAL TRIAL? Mette Nørgaard, Professor, MD, PhD Department of Clinical Epidemiology Aarhus Universitety Hospital Aarhus, Denmark Danish Medical Birth Registry
More informationCritical Appraisal of Evidence A Focus on Intervention/Treatment Studies
Critical Appraisal of Evidence A Focus on Intervention/Treatment Studies Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, CPNP/PMHNP, FAANP, FAAN Associate Vice President for Health Promotion University Chief Wellness
More informationIs There An Association?
Is There An Association? Exposure (Risk Factor) Outcome Exposures Risk factors Preventive measures Management strategy Independent variables Outcomes Dependent variable Disease occurrence Lack of exercise
More informationALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker
More informationWhat is a case control study? Tarani Chandola Social Statistics University of Manchester
What is a case control study? Tarani Chandola Social Statistics University of Manchester Imagine. It is 1950 You suspect an association b/w smoking and lung cancer How would you show this? Cases Find cases
More informationPresentation Outline. Introduction to Biomedical Research Designs. EBM: A Practical Definition. Grade the Evidence (Example McMaster Grading System)
Presentation Outline Introduction to Biomedical Research Designs Sean D. Sullivan, R.Ph., PhD Professor of Pharmacy, Public Health and Medicine University of Washington Why a course in Biomedical Research
More informationClinical Evidence: Asking the Question and Understanding the Answer. Keeping Up to Date. Keeping Up to Date
Clinical Evidence: Asking the Question and Understanding the Answer Keeping Up to Date 5,000? per day 1,500 per day 95 per day Keeping Up to Date 5,000? per day 1,500 per day 95 per day 1 Bias Bias refers
More informationDatabase of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) Produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Copyright 2017 University of York.
A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: a systematic review with economic modelling Brown
More informationEpidemiologic Methods and Counting Infections: The Basics of Surveillance
Epidemiologic Methods and Counting Infections: The Basics of Surveillance Ebbing Lautenbach, MD, MPH, MSCE University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Nothing to disclose PENN Outline Definitions / Historical
More informationEBM: Therapy. Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Family Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
EBM: Therapy Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Family Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University How to appraise therapy literature Are the result valid? What are the result?
More informationGRADE. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. British Association of Dermatologists April 2014
GRADE Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation British Association of Dermatologists April 2014 Previous grading system Level of evidence Strength of recommendation Level of evidence
More informationRole of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University
Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes Hossam Kandil,, MD Professor of Cardiology Cairo University ACS Treatment Strategies Reperfusion/Revascularization Therapy Thrombolysis PCI (with/ without
More informationVACCINE ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE I
VACCINE ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE I Caitlin N Dodd, MS Biostatistician, Global Child Health Cincinnati Children s Hospital Medical Center CONTENTS M1 Compare epidemiological study methods Discuss the benefits
More informationMain objective of Epidemiology. Statistical Inference. Statistical Inference: Example. Statistical Inference: Example
Main objective of Epidemiology Inference to a population Example: Treatment of hypertension: Research question (hypothesis): Is treatment A better than treatment B for patients with hypertension? Study
More informationLATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD. Will this change the guidelines?
LATE BREAKING STUDIES IN DM AND CAD Will this change the guidelines? Objectives 1. Discuss current guidelines for prevention of CHD in diabetes. 2. Discuss the FDA Guidance for Industry regarding evaluating
More informationBiases in clinical research. Seungho Ryu, MD, PhD Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University
Biases in clinical research Seungho Ryu, MD, PhD Kanguk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University Learning objectives Describe the threats to causal inferences in clinical studies Understand the role of
More informationBiostatistics and Epidemiology Step 1 Sample Questions Set 1
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Step 1 Sample Questions Set 1 1. A study wishes to assess birth characteristics in a population. Which of the following variables describes the appropriate measurement scale
More information11 questions to help you make sense of a case control study
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) making sense of evidence 11 questions to help you make sense of a case control study How to use this appraisal tool Three broad issues need to be considered when
More informationAnswer keys for Assignment 4: Measures of disease frequency
Answer keys for Assignment 4: Measures of disease frequency (The correct answer is underlined in bold text) 1. This statistic is used to estimate the risk of acquiring a disease. It may be measured as
More informationAre the likely benefits worth the potential harms and costs? From McMaster EBCP Workshop/Duke University Medical Center
CRITICAL REVIEW FORM FOR THERAPY STUDY Did experimental and control groups begin the study with a similar prognosis? Were patients randomized? Was randomization concealed? Were patients analyzed in the
More informationGATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology picture, 2 formulas & 3 acronyms
GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology 1991-2015 1 picture, 2 formulas & 3 acronyms 1 GATE: Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology Graphic Architectural Tool for Epidemiology Graphic Approach To
More informationIntegrating Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes in the Assessment of Treatments
Integrating Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes in the Assessment of Treatments Jessica M. Franklin Instructor in Medicine Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics Brigham and Women s Hospital
More informationMANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION: TREATMENT THRESHOLDS AND MEDICATION SELECTION
Management of Hypertension: Treatment Thresholds and Medication Selection Robert B. Baron, MD MS Professor and Associate Dean Declaration of full disclosure: No conflict of interest Presentation Goals
More informationADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION
Prevalence 29%; Blacks 33.5% About 72.5% treated; 53.5% uncontrolled (>140/90) Risk for poor control: Latinos, Blacks, age 18-44 and 80,
More informationEpidemiology & Evidence Based Medicine. Patrick Linden & Matthew McCall
Epidemiology & Evidence Based Medicine Patrick Linden & Matthew McCall Areas Covered in this Talk Bradford Hill Criteria Bias and confounding Study designs, advantages and disadvantages Basic definitions
More informationLearning objectives. Examining the reliability of published research findings
Examining the reliability of published research findings Roger Chou, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine and Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology Scientific
More informationCan we teach how to discriminate between good & bad evidence? the GATE approach
Can we teach how to discriminate between good & bad evidence? in 20 minutes! the GATE approach Rod Jackson June 2010 GATE: a Graphic Appraisal Tool for Epidemiology A picture, 2 acronyms & 2 formulas A
More informationCRITICAL APPRAISAL WORKSHEET 1
For Residents CRITICAL APPRAISAL WORKSHEET 1 AN ARTICLE ON THERAPY This worksheet should be submitted along with the completed Submission Form to your supervisor. It is based on the articles on therapy
More informationTransfusion triggers in acute coronary syndromes: The MINT trial
Transfusion triggers in acute coronary syndromes: The MINT trial Paul Hébert, MD MHSc(Epid) Physician-in-Chief, CHUM Professor, University of Montreal Objectives Review evidence on transfusion triggers
More informationOutline. Case control studies. Study Designs. Case Control Study. Start with OUTCOME Go backwards Check for EXPOSURE. Experimental studies
Outline Case control studies Study Designs Experimental studies Observational studies Analytic studies Descriptive studies Randomized Controlled trials Case control Cohort Cross sectional Case Control
More information50 years of pharmacovigilance: unfinished job
50 years of pharmacovigilance: unfinished job Joan-Ramon Laporte The role of pharmacoepidemiology in medicines regulation 108 market withdrawals in F, D & UK, 1961-93 Fulminant hepatitis Liver toxicity
More informationCLINICAL DECISION USING AN ARTICLE ABOUT TREATMENT JOSEFINA S. ISIDRO LAPENA MD, MFM, FPAFP PROFESSOR, UPCM
CLINICAL DECISION USING AN ARTICLE ABOUT TREATMENT JOSEFINA S. ISIDRO LAPENA MD, MFM, FPAFP PROFESSOR, UPCM Principles of Decision Making Knowing the patient s true state is often unnecessary Does my patient
More informationSESSION 3 11 AM 12:30 PM
SESSION 3 11 AM 12:30 PM for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Personalized Approach SPEAKER Samia Mora MD, MHS Presenter Disclosure Information The following relationships exist related
More informationDiabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease
Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease Nestoras Mathioudakis, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism September 30, 2013 1 The ABCs of cardiovascular
More informationSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist. MOOSE Checklist Infliximab reduces hospitalizations and surgery interventions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:
More informationAn Introduction to Epidemiology
An Introduction to Epidemiology Wei Liu, MPH Biostatistics Core Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge, LA Last edited: January, 14 th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................
More informationTool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies
Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies Contributed by the CLARITY Group at McMaster University 1. Was selection of exposed and non-exposed cohorts drawn from the same population? Exposed and unexposed
More informationStudy design. Chapter 64. Research Methodology S.B. MARTINS, A. ZIN, W. ZIN
Chapter 64 Study design S.B. MARTINS, A. ZIN, W. ZIN Research Methodology Scientific methodology comprises a set of rules and procedures to investigate the phenomena of interest. These rules and procedures
More information