WDF Indicator catalogue

Transcription

1 WDF Indicator catalogue WDF Indicator catalogue v Cross-cutting reporting and process indicators applicable for all projects: The indicators facilitate the start-up phase of the project, as well as monitor implementation and reporting to WDF. Mandatory Result indicators: Reported semi-annually to WDF and should be included as applicable vis-à-vis project design. The accumulated results are used by WDF for external reporting Optional indicators: to be selected as applicable / relevant in relation to the project design. The selected indicators can be part of semi-annual reporting to WDF and/or be included as part of a clinical impact assessment to be reported at baseline (midway) and upon completion. REPORTING AND PROCESS INDICATORS # ACCESS TO CARE # PREVENTION # ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER Progress report submitted and approved Progress report submitted and approved Progress report submitted and approved Project completion report submitted and approved Project completion report submitted and Project completion report submitted and approved approved Cash flow report submitted and approved Cash flow report submitted and approved Cash flow report submitted and approved Annual audit report submitted and approved Annual audit report submitted and approved Annual audit report submitted and approved Final audit report submitted and approved Final audit report submitted and approved Final audit report submitted and approved Deed of conveyance filled out, signed and submitted Deed of conveyance filled out, signed and submitted Sign off letter sent to partner Sign off letter sent to partner Sign off letter sent to partner Deed of conveyance filled out, signed and submitted Progress report incl. cash flow report and indicator framework submitted Progress report incl. cash flow report and indicator framework submitted Progress report incl. cash flow report and indicator framework submitted Project- and funds management structures established Project- and funds management structures established Project- and funds management structures established Project governance structure (e.g. technical working group/steering committee) established Project governance structure (e.g. technical working group/steering committee) established Project governance structure (e.g. technical working group/steering committee) established Project implementation plan prepared Project implementation plan prepared Project implementation plan prepared Procurement phase prepared through open tender process Procurement phase prepared through open tender process Procurement phase prepared through open tender process Patient registries established Patient registries established Patient registries established Monitoring plan developed Monitoring plan developed Monitoring plan developed 1 of 11

2 Focus Area # ACCESS TO CARE # PREVENTION # ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of clinics established or strengthened to provide N of clinics established or strengthened to N of project related articles published in peer T2DM care provide T2DM care and prevention reviewed journals N of doctors trained in T2DM care N of doctors trained in T2DM care and prevention 2 of 11 T2DM N of round table meetings, expert and/or advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, regionally, N of nurses trained in T2DM care N of nurses trained in T2DM care and prevention N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of other HCP (please specify) trained in T2DM care N of other HCP (please specify) trained in T2DM N of articles published in local, regional and care and prevention N of persons screened for T2DM N of persons screened for T2DM N of national media networks established N (%)patients diagnosed with T2DM N (%) of persons/patients diagnosed with T2DM N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and N of patients trained in T2DM self-care N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media N (%) of patients treated at established/strengthened clinics N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on T2DM for patients / or HCP N of manuals / guidelines / protocols produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia for HCP N of persons reached through media campaign N of T2DM screening camps conducted N of presentations at national, regional and N of community awareness activities conducted N of strategic alliances/partnerships established N of persons reached at awareness activities N of meetings with policy makers to discuss project outcomes and policy implications N of teachers trained in prevention of T2DM N of children / youth trained in prevention of T2DM N of parents trained in prevention of T2DM N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on T2DM for patients / lay persons or HCP N of media (TV and radio) reporting on diabetes N (%) of persons reached through mass media campaigns N (%) of persons identified with T2DM risk factors N (%) of persons identified with T2DM risk factors provided counselling N of persons identified with T2DM risk factors trained in prevention of T2DM N (%) of patients referred to treatment N (%) of patients treated or referred to treatment N (%) of patients in registry

3 11.15 N (%) of patients seen regularly at clinic (e.g. 4 times a year) N (%) of patients receiving regular glucose test at clinic (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG) (each visit) N (%) of patients with regular screening for late complications (micro- / macro vascular) (e.g. yearly) N (%) of patients who do regular home monitoring of blood glucose (HMBG) (e.g. daily or weekly) N (%) of patients within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of patients within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of patients with improvements in metabolic control N (%) of patients with neuropathy, or nephropathy N (%) of patients with macro vascular complications N (%) of patients with reduction in BMI N (%) of persons with reduction in BMI N (%) of persons with waist circumferences reduction N (%) of persons with normal BMI (BMI less than 25) N (%) of patients with normal BP (less than140/90) N (%) of persons with normal BP (less than 140/90) N (%) of patients with reduction in BP N (%) of patients with improvements in KAP (Knowledge, Attitude and Practices) N (%) of persons with improved knowledge about diabetes N (%) of persons doing advised exercise (young more than 60 min. moderate activity per day /elderly more than 150 min. activity per week) N (%) of persons with improved physical activity behavior N (%) of persons with improved dietary behavior 3 of 11

4 Focus Area ACCESS TO CARE PREVENTION ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of clinics established or strengthened to provide N of clinics established or strengthened to N of project related articles published in peer diabetes foot care provide diabetes foot care and prevention reviewed journals N of clinics to which diagnostic and treatment N of round table meetings, expert and/or equipment are procured and installed advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, Diabetes foot care 4 of N of doctors trained in diabetes foot care N of doctors trained in diabetes foot care and prevention regionally, N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of nurses or podiatrists trained in diabetes foot care N of nurses or podiatrists trained in diabetes foot N of articles published in local, regional and care and prevention N of other HCP (please specify) trained in diabetes N of other HCP (please specify) trained in N of national media networks established foot care diabetes foot care and prevention N of patients trained in diabetes foot self-care N of patients trained in diabetes foot self care and prevention N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and N of diabetes foot screening camps conducted N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media N of patients screened for diabetes related foot N of persons/patients screened for diabetes N of persons reached through media campaign problems related foot problems N (%) of patients with high risk feet provided care and counselling N of presentations at national, regional and N (%) of patients diagnosed with diabetes related foot N (%) of persons diagnosed with diabetes N of strategic alliances/partnerships established problems related foot problems N of community awareness activities conducted about diabetes related foot problems N of meetings with policy makers to discuss project outcomes and policy implications N of persons reached at awareness activities N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on diabetes foot care for patients or HCP N of manuals / guidelines / protocols on diabetes foot care produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia on diabetes foot care for HCP N (%) of patients with diabetes related foot problems referred to treatment N (%) of patients in registry N (%) of patients receiving regular foot examinations at clinic (e.g. once yearly) N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures produced on diabetes foot care and prevention for patients / lay persons or HCP N of media (TV and radio) reporting on diabetes related foot problems N of persons trained in diabetes foot self-care and prevention N (%) of patients detected with risk for diabetes related foot problems N (%) of patients with diabetes related foot problems treated or referred to treatment N (%) of patients receiving regular foot examinations at clinic (e.g. yearly)

5 12.23 N (%) of patients seen regularly by a podiatrist (e.g. once yearly) N (%) of patients doing self-examination according to instruction (e.g. once weekly) N (%) of patients within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of ulcers with vascular etiology N (%) of ulcers healed N (%) of patients in proper diabetes ulcer treatment according to instructions N (%) of patients amputated eventually divided in toe, forefoot, ankle, below or above knee N (%) of patients died due to diabetic ulcer N (%) of patients for which special shoes or insoles are made N (%) of patients with improvements in QOL N (%) of patients doing self-examination according to instruction (e.g. once weekly) N (%) of patients within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RBG, urine glucose) N (%) of patients use special shoes or insoles as instructed 5 of 11

6 Focus Area ACCESS TO CARE PREVENTION ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of clinics established or strengthened to provide N of project related articles published in peer diabetes eye care reviewed journals N of clinics to which diagnostic and treatment N of round table meetings, expert and/or equipment are procured and installed advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, Diabetes eye care 6 of N of doctors trained in diabetes eye care N of doctors trained in diabetes eye prevention and care regionally, N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of nurses trained in diabetes eye care N of nurses trained in diabetes eye prevention and care N of articles published in local, regional and N of other HCP (please specify) trained in diabetes N of other HCP (please specify) trained in N of national media networks established eye care diabetes eye care and prevention N of diabetic screening camps conducted N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and N of community awareness activities conducted about diabetic N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media N of persons reached at awareness activities N of persons reached through media campaign N of patients screened for diabetic N of patients/persons screened for diabetic N of presentations at national, regional and N (%)of patients diagnosed with diabetic N of strategic alliances/partnerships established N (%) of patients diagnosed with non-proliferative N (%) of patients/persons diagnosed with nonproliferative N (%) of patients diagnosed with proliferative N of patients trained in diabetes eye care N (%) of patients treated with laser N (%) of patients treated with surgery of the eye N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on diabetes eye care for patients / or HCP N of manuals / guidelines / protocols on diabetes eye care produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia on diabetes eye care for HCP N (%) of patients with diabetic referred to treatment N (%) of patients in registry N (%) of patients receiving regular eye-examination according to instruction (e.g. once yearly) N (%) of patients/persons diagnosed with proliferative N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on diabetes eye care for patients / lay persons or HCP N of media (TV and radio) reporting on diabetes eye prevention and care N (%) of patients with diabetic treated or referred to treatment N (%) of patients receiving regular eye examination according to instruction (e.g. once N of meetings with policy makers/ key opinion leaders to discuss project outcomes and policy implications

7 13.19 N (%) of patients with within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of patients with impaired vision due to diabetic N (%) of patients turned blind due to diabetic N (%) of patients with improvements in QOL yearly) N (%) of patients with within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RBG, urine glucose) 7 of 11

8 Focus Area ACCESS TO CARE PREVENTION ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of clinics strengthened with GDM/Diabetes in N of project related articles published in peer pregnancy care reviewed journals N of doctors trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N of doctors trained in GDM/Diabetes in N of round table meetings, expert and/or care pregnancy careand prevention advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, Diabetes and pregnancy N of nurses trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy care N of other HCP (please specify) trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy care N of nurses trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy care and prevention N of other HCP (please specify) trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy care and prevention regionally, N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of articles published in local, regional and N of GDM screening camps conducted N of national media networks established N of women screened for GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N of women screened for GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and N (%) of women diagnosed with GDM /Diabetes in pregnancy N (%) of women diagnosed with GDM / Diabetes in pregnancy N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media N of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy trained N of persons reached through media campaign in GDM care N (%) of women treated for GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N of presentations at national, regional and N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy for patients or HCP N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy for patients / lay persons or HCP N of strategic alliances/partnerships established N of manuals / guidelines / protocols on GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia regarding GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy for HCP N (%) of women at high risk of GDM /Diabetes in pregnancy provided counselling N of community awareness activities conducted about GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N of women reached at awareness activities N of media (TV and radio) reporting on GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N (%) of pregnant women identified at risk for developing GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy N (%) of women at high risk of GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy provided counselling N of meetings with policy makers/ key opinion leaders to discuss project outcomes and policy implications 8 of N (%) of women at high risk of GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy with improvement in risk factors during pregnancy N of women trained in GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy care and prevention

9 14.13 N (%) of GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy patients in registry N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy referred to treatment N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy with regular visit as agreed to antenatal clinic N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) (pre gestational, gestational and post gestational) N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy with no pregnancy complications N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy with spontaneous abortion, intra uterine death and/or stillbirth N (%) of pregnancies with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy related malformations N (%) of pregnancies with eclampsia, pre-eclampsia or hypertension N (%) of babies born with normal weight N (%) of babies born with macrosomia (greater than 4 kg) N (%) of pregnancies with obstructed labor N (%) of babies born by caesarean section N (%) of pregnancies with instrumental delivery N (%) of pregnancies resulting in maternal mortality N (%) of pregnancies with postpartum hemorrhage N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy receiving postpartum follow up incl. the child N (%) of pregnancies with postpartum follow-up N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy remain diabetic postpartum N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy treated or referred to treatment N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy with visit as agreed to antenatal clinic N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy undergo blood glucose test at each clinic consultation N (%) of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy within agreed glucose control in pre-gestational period (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RBPH) (pre gestational, gestational and post gestational) N of women with GDM/Diabetes in pregnancy receiving postpartum follow-up incl. the child 9 of 11

10 Focus Area ACCESS TO CARE PREVENTION ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of clinics established or strengthened to N of project related articles published in peer providet1dm care reviewed journals N of doctors trained in T1DM care N of round table meetings, expert and/or advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, regionally, N of nurses trained in T1DM care N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of other HCP (please specify) trained in T1DM care N of articles published in local, regional and N of T1DM camps arranged N of national media networks established N (%) of T1DM patients receiving care according to N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and guidelines for T1DM N of T1DM patients trained in T1DM self-management N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media N of households (parents and children) trained in selfmanagement of T1DM and healthy N of persons reached through media campaign living T1DM N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures on T1DM for patients / lay persons or HCP N of manuals / guidelines / protocols on T1DM care produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia on T1DM care for HCP N (%) of T1DM patients within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of T1DM patients in registry N (%) of T1DM patients with regular attendance to clinic (e.g. four times a year) N (%) of T1DM patients in adequate insulin therapy N of presentations at national, regional and N of strategic alliances/partnerships established N of meetings with policy makers/ key opinion leaders to discuss project outcomes and policy implications N (%) of T1DM patients doing Home Blood Glucose Measurement (HBGM) regularly (e.g. daily or weekly) N (%) of T1DM patients with severe hypo-glycaemia N (%) of T1DM patients with keto-acidosis N (%) of T1DM patients with chronic complications (neuropathy, or nephropathy) 10 of 11

11 Focus Area ACCESS TO CARE PREVENTION ADVOCACY AND STAKEHOLDER N of TB and /or diabetes clinics established or N of project related articles published in peer reviewed strengthened with TB and diabetes care journals N of doctors trained in TB and diabetes care N of round table meetings, expert and/or advocacy meetings held locally, nationally, regionally, N of nurses trained in TB and diabetes care N of media broadcasts (TV and radio) on WDF sponsored events locally, nationally, regionally, and N of other HCP (please specify) trained in TB and N of articles published in local, regional and diabetes care N (%) of patients with TB screened for diabetes N of national media networks established N (%) of patients with TB diagnosed with diabetes N of press meetings held locally, regionally, and N (%) of patients with TB/diabetes co-morbidity in N of diabetes & NCD related posts on social media treatment according to guidelines N of patients trained in TB and diabetes care N of persons reached through media campaign N of educational material / booklets / posters / brochures N of presentations at national, regional and on TB/diabetes for patients / lay persons or HCP TB and diabetes 11 of N of manuals / guidelines / protocols regarding TB/diabetes produced for HCP N of seminars / forums / symposia regarding TB/diabetes for HCP N (%) of patients with diabetes screened for TB N (%) of patients with diabetes diagnosed with TB N (%) of patients diagnosed with diabetes and TB N (%) of patients with high risk of diabetes and TB provided with counselling N (%) of patients with TB/diabetes co-morbidity referred to treatment N (%) of patients with TB/anddiabetes within agreed target for glucose control (HbA1c, BG profile, PPG, FPG, RPG, urine glucose) N (%) of patients with TB and diabetes with regular attendance to clinic N (%) of TB anddiabetes patients in registry N (%) of patients with complications in TB treatment (sputum positive, relapse, multi drug resistance) N (%) of patients died due to TBand diabetes compared to similar patients outside project or patient with only one of the two conditions N (%) of persons reached at TB and diabetes awareness activity N of strategic alliances/partnerships established N of meetings with policy makers/ key opinion leaders to discuss project outcomes and policy implications