Clinical Investigations
|
|
- Nicholas McDowell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Clinical Investigations Impact of Lesion Length on Functional Significance in Intermediate Coronary Lesions Tomokazu Iguchi, MD; Takao Hasegawa, MD; Satoshi Nishimura, MD, PhD; Shinji Nakata, MD, PhD; Toru Kataoka, MD, PhD; Shoichi Ehara, MD, PhD; Akihisa Hanatani, MD, PhD; Kenei Shimada, MD, PhD; Minoru Yoshiyama, MD, PhD Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan Address for correspondence: Tomokazu Iguchi, MD Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Osaka City University Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku Osaka , Japan Background: Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is useful in the evaluation of coronary lesion ischemia. However, the impact of lesion length on FFR has not been adequately assessed. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that lesion length would influence functional significance in intermediate coronary lesions. Methods: FFR measurements were assessed in 136 patients (163 lesions) with stable angina who had >40% stenotic coronary lesion by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). One hundred sixty-three lesions were classified as intermediate (40% 70% stenosis; n=107; group I) or significant ( 70%; n=56; group S) by QCA. We assessed the relationships between lesion length, coronary stenosis, and FFR in these 163 lesions. Results: Regression analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) and FFR in group S (r = 0.83, P < ). In group I, no significant correlation was found between %DS and FFR (r = 0.06, P = 0.55), whereas lesion length was significantly inversely correlated with FFR (r = 0.79, P < ). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the best cutoff value for predicting an FFR value <0.80 was a lesion length >16.1 mm in group I (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 94%). Conclusions: These study findings suggest that lesion length has a physiologically significant impact on intermediate-grade coronary lesions. Introduction Coronary lesion severity can be assessed using both anatomical (morphology) and physiological myocardial ischemia methods. Although coronary angiography (CAG) is the conventional gold standard anatomical evaluation method, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has markedly improved evaluation accuracy. 1 3 Optical coherence tomography, which can provide a detailed evaluation of the plaque nature, has also been developed. 4,5 Although physiological assessment, including stress electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) cannot be performed simultaneously with anatomical assessment, the assessment of physiological indicators by fractional myocardial flow reserve (FFR) using a pressure wire in recent years has allowed simultaneous evaluation with CAG. An FFR value <0.80 identifies ischemia-causing coronary stenoses with an accuracy of >90%. 6,7 The recent remarkable development of multidetectorrow computed tomography has facilitated noninvasive assessments in outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but techniques for the physiological assessment of ischemia (such as SPECT) are not often performed when patients undergo invasive CAG. FFR has been The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose. 172 used to assess revascularization indications. Several studies have suggested that, compared with angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), FFR-guided PCI is associated with reduced major adverse cardiac events in patients with multivessel CAD Although it is recommended that myocardial ischemia in CAD be determined using both physiological and morphological evaluation methods, 12,13 it is often assessed visually from CAG findings in daily clinical practice. However, visual estimation of coronary lesions is inaccurate Results obtained from quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) are often misread compared to those obtained from other modalities with regard to functional myocardial ischemia, particularly intermediate coronary lesions (40% 70% stenosis). 15,17 Although lesion length is an important geometric parameter in addition to the degree of lesion stenosis in the morphological assessment of coronary ischemia, the impact of lesion length on FFR has never been adequately assessed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between FFR and lesion length, or coronary stenosis. Methods Study Population The study population comprised 165 consecutive patients (199 lesions) with CAD who had at least 1 de novo lesion Received: August 17, 2012 Accepted with revision: October 5, 2012
2 Table 1. Patient and Lesion Characteristics Total N=163 Group I n=107 Group S n=56 P Value (I vs S) Age, y 69.0 ± ± ± Men, n 126 (77.3) 83 (77.6) 43 (76.8) 0.91 Body mass index 23.7 ± ± ± Hypertension, n 124 (76.1) 80 (74.8) 44 (78.6) 0.59 Diabetes, n 99 (60.7) 62 (57.9) 37 (66.1) 0.31 Dyslipidemia, n 99 (60.7) 64 (59.8) 35 (62.5) 0.74 Current smoker, n 78 (47.9) 51 (47.7) 27 (48.2) 0.95 Family history, n 31 (19.0) 20 (18.7) 11 (19.6) 0.88 CKD, n 29 (17.8) 19 (17.8) 10 (17.9) 0.99 Previous PCI, n 51 (31.3) 36 (33.6) 15 (26.8) 0.37 LVEF, % 56.5 ± ± ± Target vessel, n 0.66 LAD 95 (58.3) 64 (60.8) 31 (55.4) LCx 33 (20.3) 20 (18.7) 13 (23.2) RCA 33 (20.3) 21 (19.6) 12 (21.4) LMCA 2 (1.2) 2 (1.9) 0 (0) ACC/AHA classification B2+C, n 66 (40.5) 47 (43.9) 19 (33.9) 0.22 QCA and FFR Proximal RD (mm) 2.89 ± ± ± Distal RD (mm) 2.62 ± ± ± RD (mm) 2.85 ± ± ± MLD (mm) 1.00 ± ± ± 0.25 < %DS ± ± ± 7.23 < Lesion length (mm) ± ± ± FFR 0.76 ± ± ± 0.16 < Abbreviations: %DS, percentage diameter of stenosis; ACC, American College of Cardiology, AHA, American Heart Association; FFR, fractional flow reserve; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex artery; LMCA, left main coronary artery; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MLD, minimal lumen diameter; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; QCA, quantitative coronary angiography; RCA, right coronary artery; RD, reference diameter. Values are mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). (>40% stenosis measured by QCA) and who had undergone FFR for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia in our institution between August 2005 and March The exclusion criteria for the present study were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), culprit lesion of previous myocardial infarction, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, lesion with a collateral vessel, tandem lesion, in-stent restenosis lesion, cardiogenic shock, low left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction <40%), and the use of hemodialysis. Given these exclusion criteria, 136 patients with 163 lesions were included in the analysis. This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all subjects provided informed consent. Angiographic Measurements A 5-Fr or 6-Fr guiding catheter (without side holes) was used to selectively cannulate the ostium of the target coronary artery. All captured angiographic images were analyzed, and the stenosis degree was visualized according to the American Heart Association classification system 18 and offline QCA (QAngio XA 7.2; Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, the Netherlands) by 2 experienced observers who were unaware of the FFR determination results. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD), distal reference, proximal reference, reference diameter (RD), percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS), and lesion length with the least foreshortening view were measured using standard techniques. 19 The coronary lesions were then classified into 2 groups according to the QCA data results as follows: (1) intermediate stenosis (group I): 40% to 70% stenosis; (2) significant stenosis (group S): 70% stenosis. FFR Measurements After diagnostic coronary angiography was performed, a 5-Fr or 6-Fr guiding catheter without side holes was used to engage the coronary artery. A 3000-U bolus dose of heparin was intravenously administered. A in sensortipped, high-fidelity pressure wire (Certus; Radi Medical, Uppsala, Sweden) was set at 0, calibrated, advanced through the guiding catheter, and positioned distal to the site of stenosis as described previously. 6 After a 100- to 200- μg dose of nitroglycerin was injected intracoronary to prevent vasospasm, adenosine (140 μg kg 1 min 1 )was administered intravenously to induce maximum hyperemia. During offline analysis, FFR was calculated as the ratio of the mean distal intracoronary pressure to the mean aortic pressure at the time of peak hyperemia as determined by the maximum trans-stenotic gradient. An FFR value <0.80 was considered hemodynamically significant. Statistical Analysis In the present study, numerical variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation values, and categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. The χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables; the unpaired Student t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyze continuous variables. Angiographic characteristics and FFR data were compared between groups with intermediate and significant lesions. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the QCA and FFR results was then calculated for both groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also estimated for the best cutoff value as a predictor of FFR values of <0.80. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP statistical software for Mac version (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. 173
3 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) Figure 1. Correlation between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and angiographic parameters. Overall, FFR was inversely correlated with percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) (A), whereas the correlation between FFR and lesion length was weak (B). In group S, %DS was significantly correlated with FFR (C), whereas lesion length was not correlated with FFR (D). In group I, %DS was not correlated with FFR (E), whereas lesion length was significantly correlated with FFR (F). Results This study included 163 lesions in 136 patients. QCA analysis results categorized 107 lesions (65.6%) into group I and 56 lesions (34.4%) into group S. Of the 163 lesions, 88 (54.0%) were below the ischemic threshold (FFR value <0.80). Patient and lesion characteristics, including the QCA and FFR determination results, are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences between the 2 groups in baseline clinical or lesion characteristics obtained via diagnostic catheterization. QCA and FFR determination revealed that the mean FFR value for all lesions was 0.76 ± The mean lesion length was significantly greater in group I than in group S (13.72 ± 7.99 mm vs ± 5.94 mm, P = 0.004), whereas the mean FFR value was significantly lower in group S than in group I (0.61 ± 0.16 vs 0.83 ± 0.08, P < ). Relationship Between QCA Data and FFR Overall, although there were significant correlations between diameter stenosis (DS) (visual estimation), %DS, MLD, lesion length, and FFR, the correlation between FFR and lesion length was weak compared with that between FFR and each of the other parameters. In group S, although %DS and MLD were significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.83, P < , and r = 0.75, P < , respectively), lesion length was not correlated with FFR (r = 0.20, P = 0.13). In contrast, in group I, %DS was not correlated with FFR (r = 0.06, P = 0.55). MLD was weakly correlated with FFR (r = 0.43, P < ), whereas lesion length was significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.79, P < ; Figure 1). The relationship between FFR and each angiographic parameter is summarized in Table
4 Table 2. Correlation Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiographic Parameters Total r t Value P Value DS (visual) < %DS < MLD < Lesion length Group I DS (visual) %DS MLD < Lesion length < Group S DS (visual) < %DS < MLD < Lesion length Abbreviations: %DS, percentage diameter of stenosis; DS, diameter of stenosis; MLD, minimal lumen diameter. Optimal Angiographic Parameter for Predicting an FFR Value of <0.80 Using ROC analysis of the overall cohort of 163 lesions, MLD was the best parameter for predicting an FFR value of <0.80 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.87; cutoff value, 1.0 mm; sensitivity, 78.4%; specificity, 85.3%; positive predictive value [PPV], 86.3%; negative predictive value [NPV], 77.1%). In group S, %DS was the best parameter for predicting an FFR value <0.80 (AUC, 0.87; cutoff value, 72.9%; sensitivity, 84.9%; specificity, 100%; PPV, 100%; NPV, 27.3%). In group I, however, lesion length was the best parameter for predicting an FFR value <0.80 (AUC, 0.94). A lesion length of 16.1 mm was identified as the best cutoff value for predicting a categorized FFR cutoff value of 0.80 (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 94.4%; PPV, 88.2%; NPV, 93.2%; Figure 2). The ROC analysis for predicting an FFR value <0.80 is shown in Table 3. Discussion The present study showed that the degree of stenosis has significant functional importance for myocardial ischemia in angiographically detected severe stenotic lesions, and lesion length has a significant effect on intermediate stenosis. In particular, a lesion length >16 mm was the best cutoff value for predicting an FFR value <0.80 for intermediate lesions; this criterion had good sensitivity (86%), specificity (94%), PPV (88%), and NPV (93%). To date, only a few studies have focused on lesion length in coronary stenosis. Takayama and Hodgson 20 reported that lesion length (measured by 3-dimensional [3D] IVUS) had a positive correlation with pressure gradient in 17 lesions, and minimal lumen area (MLA) or lesion length measured by 3D IVUS was the only significant independent determinant of FFR. However, the sample size of the study was relatively small (17 lesions) to observe the relationship between lesion length and FFR. Briguori et al 21 reported that lesion length measured by IVUS had a weak inverse correlation with FFR (r = 0.41) in 53 intermediate lesions. ROC analysis revealed that a 10-mm lesion length was the best IVUS cutoff value for predicting an FFR value <0.75. This IVUS cutoff value had high specificity (80%) but low sensitivity (41%). Brosh et al 22 focused on lesion length in 63 angiographically determined intermediate lesions and found a weak inverse correlation between lesion length and FFR (r = 0.31) and a moderate correlation between %DS and FFR (r = 0.55). The correlation between %DS and FFR improved only when the lesion length was >10 mm (r = 0.78). The Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore study analyzed small coronary arteries (RD <3 mm), 23 and demonstrated that a lesion length >20 mm, in addition to an MLA <2 mm and a plaque burden >80% as measured by IVUS, were the best cutoff values for predicting an FFR value <0.75. A recent study suggested that lesion length with a lumen area <3.0 mm 2 (measured by IVUS) correlates weakly with FFR (r = 0.47), and that 3.1 mm was the best cutoff value of lesion length with a lumen area <3.0 mm 2 to predict an FFR value < Lopez-Palop et al 25 focused on lesion length in 106 angiographically determined intermediate-long lesions (>20 mm). That study revealed a moderate inverse correlation between lesion length and FFR (r = 0.63). ROC analysis determined that the best cutoff value for predicting an FFR value >0.80 was a lesion length of 27.1 mm. Their study included 65 patients (63.1%) with ACS in whom the microvascular bed in the infarct zone may not have been uniform or constant or may have had minimal resistance. 26 Therefore, due to the theoretical limitations of FFR for ACS lesions, we excluded ACS lesions from the present study. The studies mentioned above included only intermediate coronary lesions, whereas in this study we investigated both angiographically determined severe stenoses and intermediate lesions. Although the earlier studies adopted either 0.75 or 0.80 as an FFR cutoff value for myocardial ischemia, the current study used an ischemic FFR cutoff value of An FFR value <0.75 has been associated with ischemia in stress testing by numerous comparative studies with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and overall accuracy of 93%. However, an FFR value >0.80 is associated with negative ischemic testing with a predictive accuracy of 95%. 26 An FFR value between 0.75 and 0.80 is in the gray zone and requires clinical judgment. We conservatively considered the upper limit of the small transition zone to limit the number of potentially ischemic lesions left untreated as in the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. 9,10,16 As defined by Poiseuille s law of fluid dynamics, pressure gradient is influenced by coronary blood flow and viscosity, minimum radius, and lesion length. In effect, the pressure 175
5 (A) (B) (C) (D) Figure 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for predicting a fractional flow reserve (FFR) value <0.80. (A) ROC analysis of percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) for predicting an overall FFR value <0.80. (B) ROC analysis of lesion length for predicting an overall FFR value <0.80. (C) ROC analysis of %DS for predicting a group I FFR value <0.80. (D) ROC analysis of lesion length for predicting FFR of <0.80 in group I. gradient is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the lesion radius (r 4 ) and is proportional to lesion length. 27 The current findings are consistent with this equation. The current study showed that a 16-mm lesion length cutoff value is a highly accurate indicator of functional coronary ischemia in intermediate coronary lesions. When angiography reveals a severe coronary stenosis (73% in our study) in a subject with suspected CAD, myocardial ischemia may be diagnosed with high probability. For intermediate coronary stenosis, however, assessment of the functional significance of this lesion is required in most cases to enable decision making about revascularization. We suggest that physiological assessment should be performed according to lesion length in intermediate coronary lesions. Study Limitations This study has several limitations. First, the number of included subjects was relatively small, particularly in the group with significant stenosis (n = 56). In daily practice, FFR is often performed for angiographically detected intermediate lesions rather than significant stenoses to enable revascularization decision-making. Second, although we excluded tandem lesions from this study, the degree of stenosis is not entirely homogeneous in most coronary lesions. Third, with regard to QCA, visual assessment of DS leads to higher values than QCA assessment in many cases. As such, intermediate stenosis values may differ from visual assessment values. Finally, because this study did not include IVUS data, we could not assess the relationship Table 3. Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis for Predicting Fractional Flow Reserve <0.80 Total AUC Cutoff Value Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV %DS % MLD mm LL mm Group I %DS % MLD mm LL mm Group S %DS % MLD mm LL mm Abbreviations: %DS, percentage diameter of stenosis; AUC, area under the curve; LL, lesion length; MLD, minimal lumen diameter; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value. between FFR and IVUS data such as true vessel size, stenosis area, or target lesion plaque volume. 176
6 Conclusion Lesion length is relevant to the assessment of the physiological significance of intermediate-grade coronary lesions. If the lesions are diffuse with intermediate stenosis, physiological methods should be used to evaluate myocardial ischemia. References 1. Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16: Nissen SE, Grines CL, Gurley JC, et al. Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions. In vivo comparison to cineangiography. Circulation. 1990;81: Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, et al. Atherosclerosis in angiographically normal coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. JAm Coll Cardiol. 1995;25: Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, et al. Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation. 2002;106: Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, et al. Assessment of coronary arterial plaque by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97: Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. NEnglJMed. 1996;334: Watkins S, McGeoch R, Lyne J, et al. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2009;120: Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. JAm Coll Cardiol. 2005;46: Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year followup of the fame (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56: Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. NEnglJMed. 2009;360: Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96: Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al ACCF/AHA/ SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011;124:e574 e Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31: Brueren BR, ten Berg JM, Suttorp MJ, et al. How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standard. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18: Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90: Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55: Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99: Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51: Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation. 1985;71: Takayama T, Hodgson JM. Prediction of the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation by direct coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53: Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87: Brosh D, Higano ST, Lennon RJ, et al. Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Am Heart J. 2005;150: Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY, et al. New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [IDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol. 2010;105: Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, et al. Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4: Lopez-Palop R, Carrillo P, Cordero A, et al. Effect of lesion length on functional significance of intermediate long coronary lesions [published online ahead of print April 18, 2012]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi: /ccd Kern MJ, Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55: Kimball BP, Dafopoulos N, LiPreti V. Comparative evaluation of coronary stenoses using fluid dynamic equations and standard quantitative coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:
Factors influencing the functional significance in intermediate coronary stenosis
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology (2015) 12: 107 112 2015 JGC All rights reserved; www.jgc301.com Research Article Open Access Factors influencing the functional significance in intermediate coronary stenosis
More informationFractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center
Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2 William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center Conflict of Interest Advisory Board for HeartFlow Research grant from St. Jude
More informationAnatomy is Destiny, But Physiology is Here Today
Published on Journal of Invasive Cardiology (http://www.invasivecardiology.com) September, 2010 [1] Anatomy is Destiny, But Physiology is Here Today Thu, 9/9/10-10:54am 0 Comments Section: Commentary Issue
More informationDeclaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose
Declaration of conflict of interest Nothing to disclose Hong-Seok Lim, Seung-Jea Tahk, Hyoung-Mo Yang, Jin-Woo Kim, Kyoung- Woo Seo, Byoung-Joo Choi, So-Yeon Choi, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Gyo-Seung Hwang, Joon-Han
More informationNew Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA
New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA Can IVUS MLA Predict FFR
More informationFFR and intravascular imaging, which of which?
FFR and intravascular imaging, which of which? Ayman Khairy MD, PhD, FESC Associate professor of Cardiovascular Medicine Vice Director of Assiut University Hospitals Assiut, Egypt Diagnostic assessment
More informationBetween Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve
Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Seung-Jung Park, MD., PhD. University of Ulsan, College of Medicine Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Visual - Functional
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract. Introduction
ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Comparison between the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio and Resting Distal Coronary Artery Pressure/Aortic Pressure and the Fractional Flow Reserve: The Diagnostic Accuracy CanBeImprovedbytheUseofbothIndices
More informationIntegrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting
Integrated Use of IVUS and FFR for LM Stenting Gary S. Mintz, MD Cardiovascular Research Foundation Four studies have highlighted the inaccuracy of angiography in the assessment of LMCA disease Fisher
More informationJACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 4, NO. 7, PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: /j.jcin
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 4, NO. 7, 2011 2011 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN 1936-8798/$36.00 PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.013 Optimal Intravascular
More informationΣεμινάριο Ομάδων Εργασίας Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Σε ποιούς ασθενείς; ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΑΥΖΩΤΗΣ Επιστ. υπεύθυνος Αιμοδυναμικού Τμήματος, Βιοκλινική
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΚΑΡΔΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ Σεμινάριο Ομάδων Εργασίας 2011 Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Σε ποιούς ασθενείς; ΔΗΜΗΤΡΗΣ ΑΥΖΩΤΗΣ Επιστ. υπεύθυνος Αιμοδυναμικού Τμήματος, Βιοκλινική GUIDELINES ON MYOCARDIAL
More informationCulprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Hiroyuki Okura*, MD; Nobuya Matsushita**,MD Kenji Shimeno**, MD; Hiroyuki Yamaghishi**, MD Iku Toda**,
More informationShould we be using fractional flow reserve more routinely to select stable coronary patients for percutaneous coronary intervention?
REVIEW C URRENT OPINION Should we be using fractional flow reserve more routinely to select stable coronary patients for percutaneous coronary intervention? Seung-Jung Park and Jung-Min Ahn Purpose of
More informationFractional Flow Reserve. A physiological approach to guide complex interventions
Fractional Flow Reserve A physiological approach to guide complex interventions What is FFR? Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a lesion specific, physiological index determining the hemodynamic severity
More informationFractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography (and some neat CT images)
Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography (and some neat CT images) Victor Cheng, M.D. Director, Cardiovascular CT Oklahoma Heart Institute 1 Disclosures Tornadoes scare me 2 Treating CAD Fixing
More informationValidation of Minimal Luminal Area Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound for Assessment of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 4, NO. 6, 2011 2011 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN 1936-8798/$36.00 PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.013 Validation
More informationThree-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement for predicting clinical prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease
Editorial Three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement for predicting clinical prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease Takashi Kubo, Hiroki Emori, Yosuke Katayama, Kosei Terada Department
More informationFFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice
FFR Incorporating & Expanding it s use in Clinical Practice Suleiman Kharabsheh, MD Consultant Invasive Cardiology Assistant professor, Alfaisal Univ. KFHI - KFSHRC Concept of FFR Maximum flow down a vessel
More informationClinical case in perspective. Cases from Poland
Clinical case in perspective Cases from Poland Assoc. Prof. Jacek Legutko, MD, PhD President-Elect of the Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society Institute
More informationFIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 61, No. 9, 2013 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.012
More informationAngiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 55, No. 25, 2010 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096
More informationDebate Should we use FFR? I will say NO.
Debate Should we use FFR? I will say NO. Hyeon-Cheol Gwon Cardiac and Vascular Center Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Dr. Hyeon-Cheol Gwon Research fund from Abbott Korea
More informationPCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry
Practical Application Of Coronary Physiology in The Cath Lab Talal T Attar, MD, MBA, FACC PCIs on Intermediate Lesions NCDR Cath-PCI Registry Fraction of stenoses 50-70% treated with PCI without further
More informationEvaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013
Evaluation of Intermediate Coronary lesions: Can You Handle the Pressure? Jeffrey A Southard, MD May 4, 2013 Disclosures Consultant- St Jude Medical Boston Scientific Speaker- Volcano Corporation Heart
More informationSide Branch Occlusion
Side Branch Occlusion Mechanism, Outcome, and How to avoid it From COBIS II Registry Hyeon-Cheol Gwon Cardiac&Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine SB occlusion
More informationFractional flow reserve: a new paradigm for diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease
Perspective Fractional flow reserve: a new paradigm for diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis
More informationInternational Journal of Cardiology
International Journal of Cardiology 168 (2013) 1364 1369 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Cardiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcard Diagnostic accuracy
More informationFFR in Left Main Disease
FFR in Left Main Disease William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Interventional Cardiology Stanford University Medical Center Why FFR instead of IVUS? Physiologic versus anatomic
More informationCoronary Physiology the current state of play
Coronary Physiology the current state of play Background The concept of using the trans-stenotic pressure gradient in a diseased coronary artery as a measure to guide percutaneous coronary intervention
More informationCoronary artery disease (CAD): Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) for Pilots Risk Assessment. B. Haaff, R. Quast
Coronary artery disease (CAD): Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) for Pilots Risk Assessment B. Haaff, R. Quast Aeromedical Center Germany, Stuttgart-Airport Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany Disclosure
More informationFractional flow reserve application in everyday practice: adherence to clinical recommendations
Original Article Fractional flow reserve application in everyday practice: adherence to clinical recommendations Katia Orvin 1,2, Tamir Bental 1,2, Alon Eisen 1,2, Hana Vaknin-Assa 1,2, Abid Assali 1,2,
More informationFFR= Qs/Qn. Ohm s law R= P/Q Q=P/R
32 ο Πανελλήνιο Καρδιολογικό Συνζδριο, Θεσσαλονίκη 20/10/2011 Gould KL et al, JACC CARDIOVASC IMAG 2009 Gould KL et al AM J CARDIOL 1974 & JACC CARDIOVASC IMAG 2009 Under maximal hyperemia: Rs=Rn FFR=
More informationTechnical Aspects and Clinical Indications of FFR
Technical Aspects and Clinical Indications of FFR Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD, FESC Cardiovascular Center Aalst - OLV Clinic Aalst, Belgium Potential conflicts of interest Consulting fees and honoraria on
More informationDiagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve from Anatomic Computed TOmographic Angiography: The DeFACTO Study
Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve from Anatomic Computed TOmographic Angiography: The DeFACTO Study James K. Min 1 ; Jonathon Leipsic 2 ; Michael J. Pencina 3 ; Daniel S. Berman 1 ; Bon-Kwon
More informationCardiac transplant related arteriopathy remains a leading
Simultaneous Assessment of Fractional and Coronary Flow Reserves in Cardiac Transplant Recipients Physiologic Investigation for Transplant Arteriopathy (PITA Study) William F. Fearon, MD; Mamoo Nakamura,
More informationIntravascular ultrasound-based analysis of factors affecting minimum lumen area in coronary artery intermediate lesions
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology (2016) 13: 169 174 2016 JGC All rights reserved; www.jgc301.com Research Article Open Access Intravascular ultrasound-based analysis of factors affecting minimum lumen area
More informationΚλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
Κλινική Χρήση IVUS και OCT PERIKLIS A. DAVLOUROS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF CARDIOLOGY INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY & CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE Conflict of interest None to declare While IVUS is the most used intravascular
More informationFRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE Step-by-step measurement, Practical tips & Pitfalls
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE Step-by-step measurement, Practical tips & Pitfalls Ahmed M ElGuindy, MSc, MRCP(UK) Division of Cardiology Aswan Heart Centre 2013 Fractional Flow Reserve Essential diagnostic tool
More informationPlaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication
TCTAP 2013 Fellowship Course Left Main and Bifurcation PCI: Bifurcation PCI Plaque Shift vs. Carina Shift Prevalence and Implication Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan
More informationHybrid cardiac imaging Advantages, limitations, clinical scenarios and perspectives for the future
Hybrid cardiac imaging Advantages, limitations, clinical scenarios and perspectives for the future Prof. Juhani Knuuti, MD, FESC Turku, Finland Disclosure: Juhani Knuuti, M.D. Juhani Knuuti, M.D. has financial
More informationThe fluid, dynamic interaction of multiple sequential
Coronary Pressure Measurement to Assess the Hemodynamic Significance of Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery Validation in Humans Nico H.J. Pijls, MD, PhD; Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD; G. Jan Willem
More informationBackground: Stenotic flow reserve (SFR) derived from quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) has
Original Article Stenotic flow reserve derived from quantitative coronary angiography has modest but incremental value in predicting functionally significant coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional
More informationCase report. Resistance in the cath lab : the utility of hyperemic stenosis resistance in the functional assessment of coronary artery disease
Resistance in the cath lab : the utility of hyperemic stenosis resistance in the functional assessment of coronary artery disease Kalpa De Silva, Divaka Perera Cardiovascular Division, The Rayne Institute,
More informationFFR in Multivessel Disease
FFR in Multivessel Disease April, 26 2013 Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory Location: European Heart House, Nice, France Pim A.L. Tonino, MD, PhD Hartcentrum, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
More informationIVUS-Guided d Provisional i Stenting: Plaque or Carina Shift. Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD.
Left Main and Bifurcation Summit IVUS-Guided d Provisional i Stenting: ti Plaque or Carina Shift Soo-Jin Kang, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center,
More informationFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) --Practical Set Up Pressure Measurement --
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) --Practical Set Up Pressure Measurement -- JoonHyung Doh, MD, PhD Assistant Professor, Vision21 Cardiac and Vascular Center Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Goyang, Korea
More informationComparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy
1 International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences. 2018; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Comparison between Myocardial Ischemia Evaluation by Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion
More informationCASE from South Korea
CASE from South Korea Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD, Seoul, Korea Outpatient clinic of a non-interventional cardiologist F/56 Chief complaint: Angina with recent aggravation, CCS II~III Brief history: # Stroke
More informationWhat do the guidelines say?
Percutaneous coronary intervention in 3-vessel disease and main stem What do the guidelines say? Nothing to disclose Dariusz Dudek Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Krakow, Poland The European
More informationEffects of Increasing Doses of Intracoronary Adenosine on the Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve
JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL. 4, NO. 10, 2011 2011 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION ISSN 1936-8798/$36.00 PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.004 Effects of
More informationBenefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR
Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Director, Interventional Cardiology Stanford University Medical Center Benefit of FFR-Guided PCI FFR-Guided PCI vs. Angiography-Guided
More informationPrecise assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD),
988 YAZAKI K et al. Circ J 2017; 81: 988 992 ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261 Cardiovascular Intervention Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed
More informationImportant LM bifurcation studies update
8 th European Bifurcation Club 12-13 October 2012 - Barcelona Important LM bifurcation studies update I Sheiban E-mail: isheiban@yahoo.com Unprotected LM Percutaneous Revascularization What is important
More informationCoronary stenting: the appropriate use of FFR
Coronary stenting: the appropriate use of FFR Morton J. Kern, MD Professor of Medicine Chief of Cardiology LBVA Associate Chief Cardiology University California Irvine Orange, California To treat or not
More informationFractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data
Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data Michalis Hamilos, MD, PhD, FESC University Hospital of Heraklion Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Coronary angiography does not always tell the truth Most
More informationFFR-Guided PCI. 4 th Imaging and Physiology Summit October 29 th, 2010 Seoul, Korea. Stanford
4 th Imaging and Physiology Summit October 29 th, 2010 Seoul, Korea FFR-Guided PCI William F. Fearon, M.D. Associate Professor Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University Medical Center Disclosure Statement
More informationPrognostic Value of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
Current Use of IVUS & FFR George D. Dangas, MD, PhD, FACC, FSCAI Professor of Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine Prognostic Value of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT 0.6% / year, Cardiac Death and
More informationCoronary Artery Disease
Coronary Artery Disease Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment of Left Main Stenosis in the Presence of Downstream Coronary Stenoses Andy S.C. Yong, MBBS, PhD*; David Daniels, MD*; Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD;
More informationFFR? FFR-CT? Ischaemia testing?
FFR? FFR-CT? Ischaemia testing? Marco Zimarino, MD, PhD Institute of Cardiology - University G. d Annunzio, Chieti (Italy) Diagnostic management of patients with suspected stable CAD Risk stratification
More informationSo-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea
So-Yeon Choi, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiology Ajou University School of Medicine, Korea Anatomical vs Functional Significance? Coronary Angiogram Treadmill Test Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT MDCT Coronary Angiogram
More informationFractional Flow Reserve: The Past, Present and Future
Review Print ISSN 1738-5520 On-line ISSN 1738-5555 Korean Circulation Journal Fractional Flow Reserve: The Past, Present and Future Jeong-Eun Kim, MD and Bon-Kwon Koo, MD Department of Internal Medicine
More informationBasics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography
Basics of Angiographic Interpretation Analysis of Angiography Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD Cardiac Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea What made us nervous Supervisors Stent Contrast
More informationJose Mª de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, FESC. Cardiologia Valdecilla Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Santander. SPAIN
Validation and application of IVUS-MLA in LMCA disease Jose Mª de la Torre Hernandez, MD, PhD, FESC Interventional Cardiology Dpt Cardiologia Valdecilla Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla Santander.
More informationFFR vs icecg in Coronary Bifurcations FIESTA ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT
FFR vs icecg in Coronary Bifurcations FIESTA ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01724957 Dobrin Vassilev MD, PhD Assoc. Prof. in Cardiology Head Cardiology Clinic, Alexandrovska University Hospital Medical
More informationAcetylcholine coronary spasm provocation testing: Revaluation in the real clinical practice
Research article Interventional Cardiology Acetylcholine coronary spasm provocation testing: Revaluation in the real clinical practice Background: Japanese Circulation Society guidelines for coronary spastic
More informationFractional Flow Reserve and instantaneous wave -free Ratio. Λάμπρος Κ. Μόσιαλος Επεμβατικός Καρδιολόγος ΓΝ Παπαγεωργίου
Fractional Flow Reserve and instantaneous wave -free Ratio Λάμπρος Κ. Μόσιαλος Επεμβατικός Καρδιολόγος ΓΝ Παπαγεωργίου DISCLOSURES There are no financial conflicts of interest relevant to this presentation
More informationFFR and IVUS Guided DES Implantation in Long Diffuse Lesions
FFR and IVUS Guided DES Implantation in Long Diffuse Lesions Can We Reach Optimal DES Expansion With Conventional Stent Delivery System in Long Diffuse Lesion? Seung-Jea Tahk, MD., PhD. Ajou University
More informationEffect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki Hong, MD. PhD on behalf of the IVUS-XPL trial investigators
More informationFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) --Practical Set Up Pressure Measurement --
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) --Practical Set Up Pressure Measurement -- Joon Hyung Doh, MD, PhD Associate Professor, Division of Cardiology Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Goyang, Korea 목차 Fractional
More informationFFR: Tips and Tricks. A/Prof (Adj) Yeo Khung Keong, MBBS, FAMS, FACC, FSCAI National Heart Centre Singapore
FFR: Tips and Tricks A/Prof (Adj) Yeo Khung Keong, MBBS, FAMS, FACC, FSCAI National Heart Centre Singapore Disclosures Abbott Vascular: Speaker, Proctor (MitraClip) Boston Scientific: Consultant, honorarium
More informationUpgrade of Recommendation
Challenges in LM PCI Decision-making process for stenting Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD, Heart Institute, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Upgrade of Recommendation for
More informationFRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE USE IN THE CATH LAB BECAUSE ANGIOGRAPHY ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH!!!!!!!!
FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE USE IN THE CATH LAB BECAUSE ANGIOGRAPHY ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH!!!!!!!! Juan Antonio Pastor-Cervantes,M.D FSCAI, FACC Cardiovascular Institute Memorial Regional Hospital Hollywood Florida
More informationManagement of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard
Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard Suleiman Kharabsheh, MD Director; CCU, Telemetry and CHU Associate professor of Cardiology, Alfaisal Univ. KFHI - KFSHRC Should patients
More informationCT or PET/CT for coronary artery disease
CT or PET/CT for coronary artery disease Rotterdam 2012 Juhani Knuuti, MD, PhD, FESC Turku PET Centre University of Turku Turku, Finland Juhani.knuuti@utu.fi Turku PET Centre University of Turku Åbo Akademi
More informationInstantaneous Wave-Free Ratio
Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Alejandro Aquino MD Interventional Cardiology Fellow Washington University in St. Louis Barnes-Jewish Hospital Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Alejandro Aquino MD Disclosure
More informationUnprotected LM intervention
Unprotected LM intervention Guideline for COMBAT Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD Professor of Internal Medicine, Seoul, Korea Current Recommendation for unprotected LMCA Stenosis Class IIb C in ESC guideline
More informationThe Final 10-Year Follow-up Results from the Bari Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49;1600-6
The Final 10-Year Follow-up Results from the Bari Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49;1600-6 n&list_uids=17433949 64-Multislice Detector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography as Potential Alternative
More informationCan Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!
Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO! Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD Heart Institute, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center,
More informationFractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Shown to Improve Patient Outcomes and Reduce Costs. Executive Summary
(FFR) Shown to Improve Patient Outcomes and Reduce s Keywords Fractional Flow Reserve, coronary artery disease, stenosis, blood flow blockages Published: 5 October 213 Citation: RadcliffeCardiology.com,
More informationClinical Appropriateness Guidelines: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriate Use Criteria Effective Date: January 2, 2018 Proprietary Date of Origin: 08/27/2015 Last revised: 08/01/2017 Last reviewed:
More informationINSIDE INFORMATION YOU CAN T IGNORE
INSIDE INFORMATION YOU CAN T IGNORE Volcano, the Volcano logo and SyncVision are registered trademarks of Volcano Corporation. All other trademarks set-forth are properties of their respective owners.
More informationPROMUS Element Experience In AMC
Promus Element Luncheon Symposium: PROMUS Element Experience In AMC Jung-Min Ahn, MD. University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea PROMUS Element Clinical
More informationPressure Wire Study. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Nishat Jahagirdar Principal Clinical Cardiac Physiologist Kings College Hospital
Pressure Wire Study Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Nishat Jahagirdar Principal Clinical Cardiac Physiologist Kings College Hospital History Andreas Gruentzig s paper on Non operative dilation of coronaryartery
More informationControversies in Coronary Revascularization. Atlanta CCU April 15, 2016
Controversies in Coronary Revascularization Atlanta CCU April 15, 2016 Habib Samady MD FACC FSCAI Professor of Medicine Director, Interventional Cardiology, Emory University Director, Cardiac Catheterization
More informationFor Personal Use. Copyright HMP 2013
Case Report J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2013;25(2):E39-E41 A Case With Successful Retrograde Stent Delivery via AC Branch for Tortuous Right Coronary Artery Yoshiki Uehara, MD, PhD, Mitsuyuki Shimizu, MD, PhD,
More informationPerspectives of new imaging techniques for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease
Perspectives of new imaging techniques for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Correspondence: Jeroen
More informationForm 4: Coronary Evaluation
Form : Coronary Evaluation Print this Form t Started Date of Coronary Evaluation Coronary Evaluation Indication for Coronary Evaluation Check only one. Angio NOT DONE: n invasive test performed Followup
More informationForm 4: Coronary Evaluation
Patient Details Hidden Show Show/Hide Annotations Form : Coronary Evaluation Print this Form t Started Date of Coronary Evaluation Coronary Evaluation Indication for Coronary Evaluation Check only one.
More informationCoronary Physiology in the Cath Lab: Beyond the Basics
Coronary Physiology in the Cath Lab: Beyond the Basics Morton J. Kern, MD, FSCAI KEYWORDS Coronary artery disease Cardiac catheterization laboratory Translesional pressure measurement In-lab coronary physiology
More informationNoninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography
2016 KSC Annual Spring Scientific Conference Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD, Seoul, Korea Why the hemodynamics for coronary artery disease? Twinlifemarketing.com.au
More informationAun-Yeong Chong MD, MRCP(UK), MBBS University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Aun-Yeong Chong MD, MRCP(UK), MBBS University of Ottawa Heart Institute Cardiac Imaging Symposium Oct 2013 Invasive Coronary Artery Assessment Coronary angiography IntraVascular UltraSound (IVUS) Optical
More informationLong-Term Outcome After Deferral of Revascularization in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis and Gray-Zone Fractional Flow Reserve
Circulation Journal Official Journal of the Japanese Circulation Society http://www.j-circ.or.jp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cardiovascular Intervention Long-Term Outcome After Deferral of Revascularization in Patients
More informationCase Review: Borderline LM with IVUS and FFR. Ravi Ramana, DO Heart Care Centers of Illinois SCAI Annual Conference 2010
Case Review: Borderline LM with IVUS and FFR Ravi Ramana, DO Heart Care Centers of Illinois SCAI Annual Conference 2010 Disclosures No relevant disclosures. Borderline Left Main Disease Significant LMS
More informationPost PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React
Post PCI functional testing and imaging: case based lessons from FFR React Joost Daemen, MD, PhD, FESC Optics in Cardiology 2018 April 21st, 2018 10.15 10.30h Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
More informationEvidence for myocardial CT perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease
Editorial Evidence for myocardial CT perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease Zhonghua Sun Discipline of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging and Applied
More informationJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 46, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /05/$30.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 46, No. 5, 2005 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/05/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.009
More informationDo stents deserve the bad press? Mark A. Tulli MD, FACC
Do stents deserve the bad press? Mark A. Tulli MD, FACC Disclosures: None Introduction Stents don t help people. Stents are bad for patients. Heart Treatment Overused WSJ Study Finds Doctors Often Too
More informationVCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital
VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital Complex PCI: Multivessel Disease George W. Vetrovec, MD. Kimmerling Chair of Cardiology VCU Pauley Heart Center Virginia
More informationFFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention
FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention - Pressure wire in Bifurcation lesions - Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea Bifurcation Lesions Bifurcation Lesions Still
More informationROLE OF CORONARY PRESSURE & FFR IN MULTIVESSEL DISEASE
ROLE OF CORONARY PRESSURE & FFR IN MULTIVESSEL DISEASE Angioplasty Summit TCT ASIA Seoul, Korea, april 24th, 2008 Nico H. J. Pijls, MD, PhD Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands A rather common
More information