Multiple mechanical valve replacement surgery comparison of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses
|
|
- Shannon Walker
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Multiple mechanical valve replacement surgery comparison of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses W.R. Eric Jamieson *, A. Ian Munro, Robert T. Miyagishima, Gary L. Grunkemeier, Lawrence H. Burr, Samuel V. Lichtenstein, G. Frank O. Tyers Department of Surgery, St. Paul s Hospital-Heart Centre, Vancou er General Hospital, Uni ersity of British Columbia, West 10th A enue, Vancou er V5Z 4E3, Canada Received 28 July 1997; received in revised form 8 December 1997; accepted 16 December 1997 Abstract Objective: The experience with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet mechanical prostheses was evaluated to determine thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and predictive risk factors. Methods: From 1989 to 1994, a total of 246 patients had multiple valve replacement (SJM, 140; CM, 106); concomitant procedures 20.3% (50) [coronary artery bypass 10.6% (26)] and 53.7% (132) previous cardiac surgery, primarily valve replacement procedures. The pre-operative variables [coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery, concomitant procedures, valve lesion (except mitral stenosis), status, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA III/IV] did not distinguish the prosthesis-type (p). Results: The prosthesis-type and the pre-operative variables, including atrial fibrillation, were not predictive of overall thromboembolism (TE). The linearized rate of total TE events for overall multiple replacements (MR) was 5.4%/patient-year (minor, 2.52; major 2.85); the total TE for CM and SJM was 5.4%/patient-year, respectively. The 30 day major TE crude rate was 0.82%, while the 30 day major event rate was 2.7%/patient-year. Of the total (major and minor) TE events 100% (3) of 30 days and 72% (29), 30 days had an INR 2.5 at or immediately prior to the event. The thrombosis rate (included in total TE events) was 0.67%/patient-year (4 events, 100% INR 2.5). Of the various TE event categories the prosthesis-types (CM and SJM) were not differentiated (p). The freedom, at 5 years, from major/fatal TE, thrombosis and hemorrhage from anticoagulation was % for CM and % for SJM and, % and %, respectively, (p) exclusive of early events. Conclusions: The performance of the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses in multiple valve replacement surgery in this non-randomized prospective study revealed no significant differences in performance with regard to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mechanical prostheses; Thromboembolism; Predictive factors and anticoagulation 1. Introduction The first mechanical prosthesis, the Starr Edwards caged-ball prosthesis (Baxter Healthcare, Edwards CVS Division, Irvine, CA) was introduced 35 years ago. The developments in mechanical prostheses have incorporated both monoleaflet and bileaflet designs, both formulated with pyrolytic carbon in whole or in part. The * Corresponding author. Tel ; fax: two predominant bileaflet mechanical prostheses are the St. Jude Medical (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) and the CarboMedics (Sulzer-Carbomedics, Austin, TX). The St. Jude Medical prosthesis was introduced in 1977 and has been the most widely implanted mechanical bileaflet prosthesis. The documentation with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis primarily reveals the 10-year experience [1 12]. The CarboMedics prosthesis was introduced as an investigational prosthesis in 1986 and received approval to the marketplace in The CarboMedics prosthesis has an increasing number of /98/$ Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII S (97)
2 152 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) published clinical studies [13 18]. There has been no randomized or non-randomized trials comparing the clinical performance of bileaflet prostheses. The purpose of this communication is to document the thromboembolic rate of the bileaflet mechanical prostheses, St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics, in a prospective non-randomized study comparing the experience between the prostheses in multiple valve replacements and to determine predictors of performance. 2. Patient Population From September 1989, the time of commencement of the University of British Columbia in the United States-Food and Drug Administration CarboMedics investigational study, to June 1994 the CarboMedics (CM) and St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses were evaluated in a non-randomized prospective study. The prostheses were implanted, generally, by different surgeons within the teaching hospitals of the University of British Columbia. Multiple valve replacements were performed in 246 patients (male, 108; female, 138). The mean age of the population was (S.D.) years (range years). There were 52.4% NYHA class III and 33.3% class IV patients. The mean follow-up was (S.D.) years, a total of years. The median followup was 2.32 years. The completeness of follow-up was 99.6%. The overall patient population comprised 217 (CM, 98; SJM, 119) aortic valve replacements (AVR) and mitral valve replacements (MVR); two (CM, one; SJM, one) AVR and tricuspid valve replacements (TVR); 11 (CM, three; SJM, eight) MVR and TVR; two (SJM, two) AVR and pulmonary valve replacements; 12 (CM, three; SJM, nine) AVR, MVR and TVR; and two (CM, 1; SJM, 1) AVR and MVR and pulmonary valve replacements. The patient population incorporated 12 porcine bioprostheses implanted in the tricuspid and pulmonary positions. There were also three Starr-Edwards prostheses and one Duromedics mechanical prosthesis. Concomitant procedures were performed in 20.3% (50) of the patients, coronary artery bypass in 10.6% (26) of the patients. Of the multiple population, 53.7% (132) had previous cardiac procedures, primarily valve replacement procedures. In these multiple replacements (MR) the CM was implanted in 106 patients (male, 49; female, 57) and the SJM in 140 patients (male, 59; female, 81). The mean age of the MR-CM population was (S.D.) years (range years) and for SJM, (S.D.) years (range years). (p) The MR-CM patients were 57.5% NYHA class III and 31.1% class IV, while for SJM patients, 48.6% and 35.0%, respectively (p). The mean follow-up for MR-CM was (S.D.) years (total years) and for SJM was (S.D.) years (total years). The median follow-up was 2.04 years for CM and 2.48 years for SJM. The completeness of follow-up was 100 and 99.3%, respectively. The patient populations for MR for the CM and SJM groups were essentially the same considering the incidence of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, previous cardiovascular surgery, concomitant procedures, valve pathology and status of procedures (p) (Table 1). The incidence of mitral stenosis (CM, 27.3%; SJM, 15.7%) did distinguish the populations (P= 0.038). 3. Methods and Statistical Analysis The Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality After Cardiac Valvular Operations were used for definitions of valve-related complications, categorization and statistical methods [19]. The recommended definitions of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events proposed by Bodnar et al. [20]. in the article entitled Proposal for Reporting Thrombosis, Embolism and Bleeding after Heart Replacement have been incorporated in the evaluation. The thromboembolic complications have been categorized by these authors, as follows: 1. valve thrombosis; 2. cerebrovascular accident as occlusive (ischemic) or hemorrhage in origin, in terms of transient ischemic attack ( 24 h), reversible ischemic neurological deficit (RIND-minor stroke) ( 72 h with complete resolution within 3 weeks), major stroke; 3. systemic (non-cerebral) embolism; 4. systemic (non-cerebral) bleeding. The information on valve-related complications for this study was obtained by direct contact with patients, family physicians, consultants, hospital health records, and official death registries over a closing interval of 6 months. The valve-related complications and composite indexes of these valve-related complications were evaluated in the time-related manner by actuarial life-table techniques (Cutler Ederer method). The Wilcoxon Gehan statistic was used to provide comparison of complication-free curves. Linearized occurrence rates (events per 100 patient-years or percent per patientyear) were utilized specifically for documenting thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The instantaneous hazard functions were determined from combined (CM and SJM) life tables and were demonstrated as bar grafts for thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events and valve-related mortality and reoperation. The predictors of early mortality were
3 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Table 1 Multiple valve replacementcomparison of groups (CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses Variables n (%) Carbomedics (n=6) St Jude Medical (n=140) P-value Coronary artery disease 9 (8.5%) 17 (12.1%) Previous CV surgery 51 (48.1%) 81 (57.9%) Concomitant procedures 24 (22.6%) 26 (18.6%) Atrial Fibrillation 49 (46.2%) 69 (49.3%) Valve lesion Aortic regurgitation 49 (46.2%) 66 (47.1%) Aortic stenosis 34 (32.1%) 33 (23.6%) Aortic mixed 12 (11.3%) 23 (16.4%) Mitral regurgitation 67 (63.2%) 91 (65.0%) Mitral stenosis 29 (27.3%) 22 (15.7%) 0.038* Mitral mixed 7 (6.6%) 20 (14.3%) Status Elective 86 (81.1%) 116 (82.9%) Urgent 17 (16.1%) 19 (13.6%) Emergent 3 (2.8%) 5 (3.6%) ** NYHA III/IV 94 (88.6%) 117 (83.6%) 2 -test. * Yates corrected 2 -test. ** Fisher s exact test. determined by stepwise logistic regression, and the predictors of late mortality and thromboembolism by the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The variables evaluated were prosthetic valve type, coronary artery bypass surgery, NYHA IV, age, gender, atrial fibrillation, urgency status and previous valvular surgery. SPSS for MS Windows release software was used for analysis. 4. Results The early and late mortality and mortality from valve-related complications are detailed in Table 2 for the overall population (including the 95% confidence limits, CL) and by prostheses types. The early mortality for the total population was 12.2% (30) (CM, 15.1%; SJM, 10.2% p). There were three (10%) valve-related deaths while cardiac causes were 40% (12) and non-cardiac causes and surgical causes were 50% (15). The risk factors of early mortality were NYHA IV, and advancing age (Table 3). The late mortality for the overall patient population was 3.85%/patient-year (23). The valve-related rate of late mortality was 2.2%/patient-year. There were four deaths due to major thromboembolism, two due to prosthesis thrombosis and one due to hemorrhage. There were also two due to prosthetic valve endocarditis and four due to non-structural dysfunction. The patient survival, at 5 years, was %. The risk factors of late mortality were advancing age, NYHA IV and concomitant coronary artery bypass (Table 3). The valve-related complications are summarized in Table 4 for overall multiple valve replacement and by prosthesis-type (CM and SJM). The freedom from valve-related mortality, excluding early mortality and sudden unexpected deaths was, at 5 years, %. The only risk factor of valve-related mortality was combined thromboembolism and hemorrhage. The experience from valve-related reoperation for MR is shown in Table 5. There was three fatality for 15 reoperations (20%). The freedom from reoperation for the overall population was % at 3 years and % at 5 years. There were no risk factors predictive of reoperation. The major consideration of the clinical report is the assessment of thromboembolic complications. Tables 4 and 6 detail thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications for the overall MR population but also by the prosthesis-types (CM and SJM). The incidence of total thromboembolic events was 5.4%/patient-year, a total of 32 events (Table 4). The linearized rate for minor events was 2.52%/patient-year (15) and for major events was 2.85%/patient-year (17). There were four thrombotic events or 0.67%/patient-year. There were no risk factors of overall thromboembolism, valve type was not a factor (Table 3). The overall linearized rate of hemorrhage was 1.34%/patient-year with one fatality (Table 4). The major thromboembolic events and major anticoagulant complications have been considered for two time intervals, 30 days and 30 days (Table 6). The overall major events ( 30 days) (major, reversible,
4 154 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Table 2 Mortality and mortality from valve-related complications CM rate (event)* SJM rate (event) Total rate (event) 95% CI Early mortality 15.1% (16) 10.0% (14) 12.2% (30) Late mortality 3.71 (9) 3.96 (14) 3.85 (23) Death-related failure 1.24 (3) 0.57 (2) 0.84 (5) Sudden death 0.28 (1) 0.17 (1) Valve-related death Complications 2.06 (5) 2.26 (8) 2.18 (13) Thromboembolism 1.13 (4) 0.67 (4) Thrombosis 0.41 (1) 0.28 (1) 0.34 (2) Hemorrhage 0.41 (1) 0.17 (1) Prosthetic valve endocarditis 0.82 (2) 0.34 (2) Structural valve deterioration Non structural dysfunction 0.41 (1) 0.85 (3) 0.67 (4) Reoperation 0.14 (1) 0.57 (2) 0.50 (3) * All rates except early mortality are calculated as % per patient-year. Table 3 Multiple valve replacementpredictors of performance Valve type Atrial fibrillation CAB NYHA III/IV Age Sex Urgency status Previous valve surgery Early mortality Late mortality TE (overall) TE (excluding early events) CAB, coronary artery bypass; TE, thromboembolism. thrombosis and fatal) was 2.7%/patient-year. Of the 246 patients the number of major events 30 days were one major TE reversible, nine major TE permanent, two systemic TE major, four thrombosed prostheses and of the total five fatalities. There were six hemorrhagic events, with one fatality, requiring hospitalization or outpatient transfusions. Within the hospital or early period 30 days there were two major thromboembolic events, a crude rate of 0.81% with one fatality and two major hemorrhagic events, 0.81%. The Figs. 1 and 2 illustrate the freedom for MR of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events overall and exclusive of early events ( 30 days). The figures show the freedoms from major thromboembolism, and overall major/fatal thromboembolism, thrombosis and hemorrhagic events. The freedom from overall major thromboembolism was, at 5 years, % and % with exclusion of early events (CM, %; SJM, %; and exclusion of early events % and %, respectively) (p) (Fig. 1). The freedom from thrombosis, at 5 years, was %. The assessment of overall events (Fig. 2) revealed 5 year freedom of % and % with exclusion of early events (CM, %; SJM, %; and exclusion of early events % and %, respectively) (p). The instantaneous hazard rates of overall thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events are demonstrated in Fig. 3 showing six-monthly rates. The instantaneous hazard rates of valve-related mortality and reoperation, including mortality from reoperation is illustrated in Fig. 4, also showing six-monthly rates. The anticoagulant status of patients who experienced thromboembolic events at the various time intervals was determined. The recommended INR range to patients and family physicians was There was one in-hospital event and that person was considered inadequately anticoagulated considering an INR of 2.5 as the minimal level of anticoagulant adequacy. There were 31 post-hospital events and 76% were inadequately anticoagulated. Of the 32 events, three occurred 30 days and all were inadequately anticoagulated while of day events 72% were not on adequate anticoagulation. The rhythm at the time of anticoagulation inadequacy was atrial fibrillation, 46%, and normal sinus rhythm, 54%. There were four episodes of prosthesis thrombosis, 0.68%/patient-year (Tables 4 and 6), 1 patient had both a thrombosed tricuspid prosthesis managed by explant surgery and subsequently a fatal thrombosed mitral prosthesis identified at autopsy, both CM prostheses. All these patients occurred out of hospital beyond the 1
5 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Table 4 Valve-related complicationsmultiple valve replacement CM rate (event)* SJM rate (event) Total rate (event) 95% CI Total TE (incl. Thrombosis) 5.36 (13) 5.37 (19) 5.37 (32) Major TE and thrombosis (incl. Reversible)overall 2.89 (7) 2.83 (10) 2.85 (17) Minor TE 2.47 (6) 2.54 (9) 2.52 (15) Major TE and thrombosis (incl. Reversible) 30 days 2.89 (7) 2.26 (8) 2.52 (15) Fatal TE (excl. thrombosis) 1.13 (4) 0.67 (4) Thrombosisoverall 1.24 (3) 0.28 (1) 0.67 (4) Fatal thrombosis 0.41 (1) 0.28 (1) 0.34 (2) Hemorrhageoverall 2.06 (5) 0.85 (3) 1.34 (8) Hemorrhage 3 days 1.24 (3) 0.85 (3) 1.01 (6) Prosthetic valve endocarditis 0.82 (2) 1.13 (4) 1.01 (6) Non structural dysfunction 2.47 (6) 2.83 (10) 2.86 (16) Reoperation 3.71 (9) 1.70 (6) 2.52 (15) * Rates are calculated as % per patient-year. Table 5 Valve-related reoperationmultiple valve replacement CM rate (event)* SJM rate (event) Total rate (event) 95% CI Complication Thrombosis 0.82 (2) 0.28 (1) 0.50 (3) Thromboembolism Hemorrhage Prosthetic valve endocarditis 0.28 (1) 0.17 (1) Non structural dysfunction 2.47 (6) 1.41 (5) 1.84 (11) Structural valve deterioration Rates are calculated as % per patient-year., represents no events. month period. One of the patients was managed initially with thrombolytic therapy. A total of 3 patients were managed with reoperation with one fatality. One of these patients, noted above, subsequently died with thrombosis of the mitral prosthesis. The additional patient died without reoperation, thrombosis identified at autopsy. Of the three reoperations, one had explant of the thrombosed tricuspid prosthesis without replacement and one thrombectomy and one valve replacement which resulted in the fatality. The patients were inadequately anticoagulated at the time of the event, three in atrial fibrillation and one in normal sinus rhythm. 5. Discussion Thromboembolism, including thrombosis, and anticoagulant hemorrhage remain the major valve-related complications of mechanical prostheses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications of the St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics mechanical prostheses in multiple valve replacement. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis has received documentation of clinical performance to 10 years [1 12]. The CarboMedics prosthesis has an increasing number of publishing clinical studies [13 18]. There has been no randomized or non-randomized trials comparing the clinical performance of the two bileaflet prostheses. The University of British Columbia commenced utilization of the CarboMedics prosthesis in September 1989 as part of the multicentre investigational study. The experience with the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses between September 1989 and June 1994 inclusive formulates the patient population of this study. The study was conducted as a non-randomized prospective evaluation. The study, although early, revealed no significant difference in the clinical performance of the two prostheses in multiple replacements. The prostheses were not differentiated with regard to the incidence of overall thromboembolism. The current knowledge of mechanical protheses has been derived primarily from recent reports on the clinical performance of individual prostheses [13,1,2,14 16,3,17,4 11,21,22,12,18]. There have been only two randomized trials, of significance, both comparing the performance of the St. Jude Medical prosthesis to the Medtronic-Hall monoleaflet prosthesis [23,24]. The major concern with randomized reports has been the wide
6 156 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Table 6 Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events 30 days and 30 daysmultiple replacement CM rate (event)* SJM rate (event) Total rate (event) 95% CI Major events 30 days CVA TE reversible 0.28 (1) 0.17 (1) CVA TE major (non fatal) 0.82 (2) 1.13 (4) 1.01 (6) CVA TE major (fatal) 0.85 (3) 0.50 (3) Systemic TE major 0.82 (2) 0.34 (2) Thrombosis (non fatal) 0.82 (2) 0.34 (2) Thrombosis (fatal) 0.41 (1) 0.28 (1) 0.34 (2) Hemorrhage (non fatal) 0.82 (2) 0.85 (3) 0.84 (5) Hemorrhage (fatal) Major events 30 days 0.41 (1) 0.17 (1) CVA TE major (non fatal) 0.28 (1) 0.41 (1) CVA TE major (fatal) 0.28 (1) 0.41 (1) Thrombosis Hemorrhage (non fatal) 0.82 (2) 0.82 (2) * Rates for major events 30 days are calculated as % per patient year. 30 days is crude rate. variation of reported results on thromboembolic events [23,25,24,26]. There remains extensive inconsistency of clarification of definition, for most reports do not differentiate between major and minor events and do not indicate the standard of reporting. For multiple valve replacement with mechanical prostheses the incidence of thromboembolic rates have ranged between 0.3 and 6.6%/patient-year [13 16,4,6,10 12]. Smith and coauthors [12] have reported the incidence of thromboembolic events to be 0.3%/patient-year for double valve replacement for the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. On the other hand, Horstkotte and colleagues [4] have reported unexpected findings with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis with an incidence of 6.62%/patient-year for double valve replacements. These authors when considering only first or most serious of several events, documented incidence of 5.40%/patient-year for double valve replacement. Ibrahim et al. [6] have also reported high total thromboembolic rates with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis, 5.0%/patient-year for multiple valve replacements. Several reports document only events that occur beyond the early 30 day interval and consequently provide an unfair assessment of patient morbidity and mortality [2,14,15,3,4,7]. Jegaden and investigators [8], on the other hand, have expressed concern over the occurrence of major thromboembolism during the early postoperative period, often when anticoagulation has yet to be adequately controlled. There also is limited information provided on the level of anticoagulation at the time of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. The extent of patient follow-up and depth of evaluation, as well as the adequacy of anticoagulation management are likely contributing factors to the wide range of reported events. This report attempts to alleviate some of these concerns by reporting total overall events, events occurring 30 days, events occurring 30 days and classifying events as major (reversible and permanent), minor, fatal and thrombotic occlusion. The study has documented the adequacy of anticoagulation at the time of event occurrence. An INR level of 2.5 was considered as the minimal level of adequacy of anticoagulant management. The study did not determine the anticoagulant status of patients who did not have a thromboembolic event, or at times remote of an event. The overall thromboembolic rate, considering both major and minor events, for multiple replacements was 5.4%/patient-year. These results are comparable to the reported results by Horstkotte et al. [4] and Ibrahim et al. [6] with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. These results are at variance to the literature for the St. Jude Medical prosthesis, the range from other reports was %/patient-year for multiple replacements [9 12]. The results with the CarboMedics prosthesis was %/patient-year for multiple replacements [13,15,16]. This wide ranging reporting of thromboembolic rates must be related to the detailed nature of evaluation and possibly the extent of anticoagulation. The most important aspect of thromboembolism is the rates of major events, as well as, hemorrhagic events. The major event rate in the present series of combined St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses is 2.85%/patient-year for multiple replacements. The 30 day minor event rate was 2.52%/patient-year. The reports by Horstkotte and Ibrahim and colleagues [4,6] range from %/patient-year for multiple replacements. The incidence of anticoagulant hemorrhage in these reports has shown less variation. The major hemorrhagic rate in the authors combined series is 1.34%/ patient-year for multiple valve replacement. The hemorrhagic rates for the series of St. Jude Medical prostheses by Horstkotte and Ibrahim and colleagues
7 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Fig. 1. Multiple valve replacementfreedom from major thromboembolism overall and with exclusion of early events. [4,6] ranges from %/patient-year for multiple replacements. These apparent differences may explain the higher major event rates in the authors series. The inadequacy of anticoagulation in our series of overall thromboembolic events may also be a contributing factor; 100% and 72% for multiple replacements 30 days and 30 days, respectively. The prostheses thrombosis rates for our combined series was 0.68%/patient-year for multiple replacements. The thrombosis rate, reported by Orszulak and coauthors [22] for Björk Shiley standard and concave-convex prostheses was 0.27%/patient-year. Aagaard et al. [13]. reported a CarboMedics rate of 0.3%/patient-year. Nitter-Hauge et al. [21]. documented the thrombosis rate for the Medtronic-Hall monoleaflet prosthesis at 0.2%/patient-year for multiple replacements. The rate of prosthesis thrombosis with the St. Jude Medical and the Björk Shiley Monostrut has been reported as low [1,24,6,8 11,22,12]. In the authors series of the four multiple replacement events in 3 patients, 1 patient had both tricuspid and mitral thrombosis. The tricuspid thrombosis was managed with explantation and no replacement while the mitral thrombosis resulted in mortality. There were three successful reoperations and one additional fatality. Of the total four thrombosed prostheses, all four had INR levels of 2.5 at or immediately prior to the event. The fatality rate from thromboembolism has been infrequently reported. The rate in the authors combined series was 0.50%/patient-year for multiple replacements. The reported fatality rates for multiple replacements is %/patient-year [1,6,10 12]. Sudden unexpected death has been considered to be a valve-related mortality [27]. In our series the incidence of sudden unexpected death was 0.17%/patient-year for multiple valve replacement. The incidence of sudden death with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis ranges from %/patient-year for multiple replacement [1,8,10,11]. Butchart [27] reported it was illogical to attribute all sudden deaths to the prosthesis in the absence of an autopsy. The authors study revealed no influence of prosthesis type on overall thromboembolism but late major TE rates were high (2.7%/patient-year for multiple replacements) and higher including early events 30 days. The thrombosis rates were high, as well as in other reported series [1,6,8,11,12]. The commencement of anticoagulation, at our hospitals, on the 3rd to 4th day without heparinization may be less than optimal. The Fig. 2. Multiple valve replacementfreedom from major/fatal TE, thrombosis and hemorrhage overall and with exclusion of early events. Fig. 3. Multiple valve replacementhazard function of thromboembolism and hemorrhagic events.
8 158 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) Fig. 4. Multiple valve replacementhazard function of valve-related mortality and reoperation. long-term management of anticoagulation by numerous family physicians and internists may require reconsideration and possibly home anticoagulation management [28 30]. Irrespective of these concerns our results parallel the embolic rates confirmed with well conducted studies of Horstkotte and Ibrahim and colleagues [4,6]. The concluding comment is that mechanical prostheses in multiple replacement carry a high risk of embolic and hemorrhagic complications but the performance is not different with the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses. References [1] Aoyagi S, Oryoji A, Nishi Y, Tanaka K, Kosuga K, Oishi K. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108: [2] Baudet EM, Puel V, McBride JT, Grimaud JP, Roques F, Clerc F, Roques X, Laborde N. Surgery for acquired heart disease: long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109: [3] Fernandez J, Laub GW, Adkins MS, Anderson WA, Chen C, Bailey BM, Nealon LM, McGrath LB. Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107: [4] Horstkotte D, Schulte H, Bircks W, Strauer B. Unexpected findings concerning thromboembolic complications and anticoagulation after complete 10 year follow up of patients with St. Jude Medical prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2: [5] Horstkotte D, Schulte HD, Bircks W, Strauer BE. Lower intensity anticoagulation therapy results in lower complication rates with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107: [6] Ibrahim M, O Kank H, Cleland J, Gladstone D, Sarsam M, Patterson C. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis. A 13-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108: [7] Isomura T, Hisatomi K, Hirano A, Kosuga K, Ohishi K. The St. Jude medical prosthesis in the mitral position. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:11 4. [8] Jegaden O, Eker A, Delahaye F, Montagna P, Ossette J, durand de Gevigney G, Mikaeloff PH. Thromboembolic risk and late survival after mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58: [9] Khan S, Chaux A, Matloff J, Blanche C, DeRobertis M, Kass RR, Tsai TP, Trento A, Nessim S, Gray R, et al. The St. Jude Medical valve: experience with 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108: [10] Kratz JM, Crawford FA Jr., Sade RM, Crumbley AJ, Stroud MR. St. Jude prosthesis for aortic and mitral valve replacement: a 10-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56: [11] Nakano K, Koyanagi H, Hashimoto A, Kitamura M, Endo M, Nagashima M, Tokunaga H. Twelve years experience: 12 years experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57: [12] Smith JA, Westlake GW, Mullerworth MH, Skillington PD, Tatoulis J. Excellent long-term results of cardiac valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Circulation 1993;88(5 Pt 2):II [13] Aagaard J, Hansen CN, Tingleff J, Rygg I. Seven-and-a-half years clinical experience with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4: [14] Copeland JG 3rd. An international experience with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4: [15] Copeland JG 3rd, Sethi GK, Bassett JS, North Amercian Team of Clinical Investigators. Four year experience with the CarboMedics valve: the North American experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;58: [16] de Luca L, Vitale N, Giannolo B, Cafarella G, Piazza L, Cotrufo M. Mid-term follow-up after heart valve replacement with Carbomedics bileaflet prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106: [17] Fiane AE, Saatvedt K, Svennevig JL, Geiran O, Nordstrand K, Frfysaker T. The CarboMedics valve: midterm follow-up with analysis of risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60: [18] Subotic SL, O Grenovic B, Kusic A, et al. CarboMedics heart valve prosthesis. 4 years experience. J Cardiovasc Surg 1992;33:7. [19] Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeir GH, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62: [20] Bodnar E, Butchart EG, Bamford J, Besselaar AMPH, Grunkemeier GL, Frater RW. Proposal for reporting thrombosis, embolism and bleeding after heart valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3: [21] Nitter-Hauge S, Abdelnoor M. Ten-year experience with the Medtronic-Hall valvular prosthesis. Circulation 1989:80I 43. [22] Orszulak TA, Schaff HV, De Smet J-M, Danielson GK, Pluth JR, Puga FJ. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105(2): [23] Antunes MJ. Clinical performance of St. Jude and Medtronic- Hall prostheses: a randomized comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50: [24] Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, D Orazio S, Kaiser GC, McBride LR, Pennington DG, Peigh PS, Willman VL, Labovitz AJ, Barner HB. Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;54: [25] Aramendi JI, Castellanos E, Serano A, Madiedo JB, Ortiz De Salazar A, Agosti J. A comparative study of the St. Jude Medical and Björk Shiley convexo-concave prostheses in isolated valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;32(5): [26] Kim YI, Lesaffre E, Scheys I, Stalpaert G, Flameng WJ, Daenen WJ. The Monostrut versus Medtronic Hall prosthesis: a prospective randomized study. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3: [27] Butchart EG. The significance of sudden and unwitnessed death after heart valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:1 4.
9 W.R.E. Jamieson et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 13 (1998) [28] Butchart EG, Lewis PA, Grunkemeier GL, Kulatilake N, Breckenridge IM. Low risk of thrombosis and serious emboli events despite low-intensity anticoagulation. Experience with 1004 Medtronic Hall valves. Circulation 1988;78: [29] Cortelazzo S, Finazzi G, Viero P, Galli M, Remuzzi A, Parenzan L, Barbui T. Thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis attending an anticoagulation clinic. Thromb Haemost 1993;69: [30] White RH, McCurdy SA, Von Marensdorf H, Woodruff DE Jr., Letgoff L. Home prothrombin time monitoring after the initiation of warfarin therapy: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1989;III(9):
Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical mitral or multiple valve replacement: lessons learned from GELIA (GELIA 5)
European Heart Journal Supplements () 3 (Supplement Q), Q39 Q43 Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical mitral or multiple valve replacement: lessons learned from GELIA
More informationReoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment
Reoperation for Bioprosthetic Mitral Structural Failure: Risk Assessment W.R.E. Jamieson, MD; L.H. Burr, MD; R.T. Miyagishima, MD; M.T. Janusz, MD; G.J. Fradet, MD; S.V. Lichtenstein, MD; H. Ling, MD Background
More informationThe CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart was introduced
The CarboMedics Valve: Experience With 1,049 Implants José M. Bernal, MD, José M. Rabasa, MD, Francisco Gutierrez-Garcia, MD, Carlos Morales, MD, J. Francisco Nistal, MD, and José M. Revuelta, MD Department
More informationPrognosis after aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses: impact on outcome of varying thromboembolic and bleeding hazards
European Heart Journal Supplements (1) 3 (Supplement Q), Q27 Q32 Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical bileaflet prostheses: impact on outcome of varying thromboembolic and bleeding
More informationSurgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease
Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement W. R. E. Jamieson, MD, O. von Lipinski, MD, R. T.
More information15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION 15-Year Comparison of Supra-Annular Porcine and PERIMOUNT Aortic Bioprostheses WR Eric Jamieson, MD, Eva Germann, MSc, Michel R Aupart, MD 1, Paul H Neville, MD 1, Michel A Marchand,
More informationSt. Jude Medical and CarboMedics Mechanical Heart Valves in the Aortic Position
Clinical Investigation Ozer Kandemir, MD Hilmi Tokmakoglu, MD Ulku Yildiz, MD Tevfik Tezcaner, MD A. Cem Yorgancioglu, MD Ilhan Gunay, MD Kaya Suzer, MD Yaman Zorlutuna, MD St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics
More informationFrom the Editor Robert More Vice President Research and Development Medical Carbon Research Institute (MCRI)
The On-X Experience Medical Carbon Research Institute, LLC September 2000/Volume 2/Issue 1 From the Editor Robert More Vice President Research and Development Medical Carbon Research Institute (MCRI) This
More informationOriginal Article Article original
Original Article Article original BILEAFLET MECHANICAL PROSTHESES FOR AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS YOUNGER THAN 65 YEARS AND 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER: MAJOR THROMBOEMBOLIC AND HEMORRHAGIC COMPLICATIONS
More informationLong-Term Results With the Medtronic-Hall Valvular Prosthesis
Long-Term Results With the Medtronic-Hall Valvular Prosthesis Cary W. Akins, MD Cardiac Surgical Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Background. Although more than 170,000 Medtronic-
More informationLong-term Experience with the Bjork-Shiley Monostrut Tilting Disc Valve
J Korean Med Sci 2007; 22: 1060-4 ISSN 1011-8934 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.6.1060 Copyright The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Long-term Experience with the Bjork-Shiley Monostrut Tilting Disc Valve
More informationTwenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Ikonomidis et al Twenty-year experience with the St Jude Medical mechanical valve prosthesis John S. Ikonomidis, MD, PhD John M. Kratz, MD Arthur J. Crumbley
More information16 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900
CLINICAL COMMUNIQUé 6 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 69 The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Valve, Model 69, was introduced into clinical
More informationP have been used for mitral and aortic valve replacement
A -Year Comparison of Mitral Valve Replacement With Carpentier-Edwards and Hancock Porcine Bioprostheses P. Perier, MD, A. Deloche, MD, S. Chauvaud, MD, J. C. Chachques, MD, J. Relland, MD, J. N. Fabiani,
More informationSangho Rhie, M.D.*, Jun Young Choi, M.D.*, In Seok Jang, M.D.*, Jong Woo Kim, M.D.*, Chung Eun Lee, M.D.*, Hyun Oh Park, M.D.*
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;44:220-224 ISSN: 2233-601X (Print) ISSN: 2093-6516 (Online) Clinical Research DOI:10.5090/kjtcs.2011.44.3.220 Relationship between the Occurrence of Thromboembolism
More informationOn October 3, 1977, the first St. Jude Medical (SJM)
The St. Jude Medical Cardiac Valve Prosthesis: A 25-Year Experience With Single Valve Replacement Robert W. Emery, MD, Christopher C. Krogh, Kit V. Arom, MD, PhD, Ann M. Emery, RN, Kathy Benyo-Albrecht,
More informationUpdate on Oral Anticoagulation for Mechanical Heart Valves
Update on Oral Anticoagulation for Mechanical Heart Valves Douglas C. Anderson, Pharm.D., D.Ph. Professor and Chair Dept. of Pharmacy Practice Cedarville University School of Pharmacy OHIO SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM
More informationCLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 16 YEAR RESULTS
CLINICAL COMMUNIQUE 6 YEAR RESULTS Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 6900 Introduction The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Mitral Pericardial Valve, Model 6900, was introduced
More informationMedtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance
Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, a Friedrich-Christian Riess, MD, b Peter J. Raudkivi, MD, c Jacques Metras, MD, d Edward F. G. Busse,
More informationResults With Mechanical Cardiac Valvular Prostheses
CURRENT REVEWS Results With Mechanical Cardiac Valvular Prostheses Cary W. Akins, MD Cardiac Surgical Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses
More informationClinical material and methods. Copyright by ICR Publishers 2003
Fourteen Years Experience with the CarboMedics Valve in Young Adults with Aortic Valve Disease Jan Aagaard 1, Jens Tingleff 2, Per V. Andersen 1, Christel N. Hansen 2 1 Department of Cardio-Thoracic and
More informationTHE IMPACT OF AGE, CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, AND CARDIAC COMORBIDITY ON LATE SURVIVAL AFTER BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
THE IMPACT OF AGE, CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, AND CARDIAC COMORBIDITY ON LATE SURVIVAL AFTER BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT Gideon Cohen, MD Tirone E. David, MD Joan Ivanov, MSc Sue Armstrong, MSc
More informationLong-term relative survival after primary heart valve replacement 1
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 11 (1997) 81 91 Long-term relative survival after primary heart valve replacement 1 Abstract E. Ståhle a, *, P. Kvidal b, S.O. Nyström a, R. Bergström c a Department
More informationHeart valve replacement with the Bjork-Shiley and St Jude Medical prostheses: A randomized comparison in 178 patients
European Heart Journal (1990) 11, 583-591 Heart valve replacement with the Bjork-Shiley and St Jude Medical prostheses: A randomized comparison in 178 patients S. VOGT, A. HOFFMANN, J. ROTH, P. DUBACH,
More informationThe CarboMedics prosthetic valve (Sulzer CarboMedics,
Long-Term Result of 1144 CarboMedics Mechanical Valve Implantations Chang Hyun Kang, MD, Hyuk Ahn, MD, Kyung Hwan Kim, MD, and Ki-Bong Kim, MD Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National
More informationNineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years Follow-up
Nineteen-Millimeter Aortic St. Jude Medical Heart Valve Prosthesis: Up to Sixteen Years Follow-up Dilip Sawant, FRCS, Arun K. Singh, MD, William C. Feng, MD, Arthur A. Bert, MD, and Fred Rotenberg, MD
More informationVALVE REPAIR VERSUS REPLACEMENT FOR MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY: WHEN IS A MECHANICAL VALVE STILL INDICATED?
VALVE REPAIR VERSUS REPLACEMENT FOR MITRAL INSUFFICIENCY: WHEN IS A MECHANICAL VALVE STILL INDICATED? Eugene A. Grossi, MD Aubrey C. Galloway, MD Jeffrey S. Miller, MD Greg H. Ribakove, MD Alfred T. Culliford,
More informationRepeated Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events After Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement
Repeated Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events After Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement Filip P. Casselman, MD, Michiel L. Bots, MD, PhD, Willem Van Lommel, MD, Paul J. Knaepen, MD, Ruud Lensen, MD, PhD
More informationThe operative mortality associated with repeat heart valve surgery is. Repeat heart valve surgery: Risk factors for operative mortality
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Repeat heart valve surgery: Risk factors for operative mortality J. Mark Jones, MA, AFRCS a Hugh O Kane, MCh, FRCS a Dennis J. Gladstone, FRCS a Mazin A. I.
More informationThe St. Jude Medical valve
Surgery for Acquired Heart Disease The St. Jude Medical valve Experience with 1 cases We analyzed the long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve (St. Jude Medical,
More informationLONG-TERM RESULTS OF HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH THE EDWARDS DUROMEDICS BILEAFLET PROSTHESIS: A PROSPECTIVE TEN-YEAR CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP
LONG-TERM RESULTS OF HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH THE EDWARDS DUROMEDICS BILEAFLET PROSTHESIS: A PROSPECTIVE TEN-YEAR CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP Bruno K. Podesser, MD a Gudrun Khuenl-Brady, MD a Ernst Eigenbauer,
More informationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Long-Term Outcome of the Mitroflow Pericardial Bioprosthesis in the Elderly after Aortic Valve Replacement Johan Sjögren, Tomas Gudbjartsson, Lars I. Thulin Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart
More informationThe Optimal Intensity of Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves Meta-Analysis
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 12, 2003 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/03/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.029
More informationA 20-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis
Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Mykén and Bech-Hansen A 2-year experience of 1712 patients with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis Pia S. U. Mykén, MD, PhD, a and Odd Bech-Hansen, MD, PhD b Objective: The
More informationW e have previously reported the results of a randomised
715 CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Twenty year comparison of a mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses H Oxenham, P Bloomfield, D J Wheatley, R J Lee, J Cunningham, R J Prescott, H C Miller... See end
More informationInfluence of patient gender on mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
Influence of patient gender on mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis Jennifer Higgins, MD, W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Osama Benhameid, MD, Jian Ye, MD, Anson Cheung, MD, Peter Skarsgard,
More informationCarpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve in the Aortic Position: 25-Years Experience
SURGERY: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/cme/ home. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member
More informationPrimary Care practice clinics within the Edmonton Southside Primary Care Network.
INR Monitoring and Warfarin Dose Adjustment Last Review: November 2016 Intervention(s) and/or Procedure: Registered Nurses (RNs) adjust warfarin dosage according to individual patient International Normalized
More informationClinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years
Clinical event rates with the On-X bileaflet mechanical heart valve: A multicenter experience with follow-up to 12 years John B. Chambers, MD, FRCP, FACC, a Jose L. Pomar, MD, PhD, FETCS, b Carlos A. Mestres,
More informationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Tours, France
Risk Factors for Valve-Related Complications after Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement in 505 Patients with Long-Term Follow Up Thierry Bourguignon, Eric Bergöend, Alain Mirza, Grégoire Ayegnon, Paul Neville,
More informationThe advantages and disadvantages of mechanical valve prostheses and
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Comparison of survival after mitral valve replacement with biologic and mechanical valves in 1139 patients Ye-Ying Cen, MA Donald D. Glower, MD Kevin Landolfo,
More informationDurability and Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Double Valve Replacement
Durability and Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Double Valve Replacement Masaki Hamamoto, MD, Ko Bando, MD, Junjiro Kobayashi, MD, Toshihiko Satoh, MD, MPH, Yoshikado
More informationDurability of Pericardial Versus Porcine Aortic Valves
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 44, No. 2, 2004 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/04/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.053
More informationRead at the Twenty-fourth Annual Meeting of The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Whistler, British Columbia, June 24-27, 1998.
STRUCTURAL VALVE DETERIORATION IN MITRAL REPLACEMENT SURGERY: COMPARISON OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS SUPRA-ANNULAR PORCINE AND PERIMOUNT PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESES W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD a Michel A. Marchand,
More informationThe St. Jude Medical mechanical valve is a low-profile,
Twenty-Five Year Experience With the St. Jude Medical Mechanical Valve Prosthesis J. Matthew Toole, MD, Martha R. Stroud, MS, John M. Kratz, MD, Arthur J. Crumbley III, MD, Scott M. Bradley, MD, Fred A.
More informationBall Valve (Smeloff-Cutter) Aortic Valve Replacement Without Anticoagulation
Ball Valve (Smeloff-Cutter) Aortic Valve Replacement Without Anticoagulation Begonia Gometza, MD, and Carlos M. G. Duran, MD, PhD Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, King Faisal Specialist Hospital
More information164 Ann Thorac Surg 45: , Feb Copyright by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Heart Valve Replacement with the Bjork-Shiley Mbnostrut Valve: Early Results of a Multicenter Clinical Investigation Lars I. Thulin, M.D., William H. Bain, F.R.C.S., Hans H. Huysmans, M.D., Gerrit van
More informationThe operative mortality rate after redo valvular operations
Clinical Outcomes of Redo Valvular Operations: A 20-Year Experience Naoto Fukunaga, MD, Yukikatsu Okada, MD, Yasunobu Konishi, MD, Takashi Murashita, MD, Mitsuru Yuzaki, MD, Yu Shomura, MD, Hiroshi Fujiwara,
More informationVery Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Tissue Versus Mechanical Prostheses in Adults <60 Years of Age
Very Long-Term Survival Implications of Heart Valve Replacement With Versus Prostheses in Adults
More informationSpotlight on valvular heart disease guidelines. Prosthetic heart valves. Bernard Iung Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University Paris, France
Spotlight on valvular heart disease guidelines. Prosthetic heart valves. Bernard Iung Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University Paris, France Faculty disclosure First name - last name I disclose the following
More informationA valve was initiated at the Medical University of
St. Jude Prosthesis for Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement: A Ten-Year Experience John M. Kratz, MD, Fred A. Crawford, Jr, MD, Robert M. Sade, MD, Arthur J. Crumbley, MD, and Martha R. Stroud, MS Division
More informationCARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL VALVES IN THE MITRAL POSITION: TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP M. R. Aupart, MD P. H. Neville, MD S. Hammami, MD A. L. Sirineili, MD Y. A. Meurisse, MD M. A. Marchand, MD Objective: The
More informationCarpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular aortic porcine bioprosthesis: Clinical performance over 20 years W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Lawrence H. Burr, MD, Robert T. Miyagishima,
More informationThe clinical experience reported in recent Western series has provided
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Yu et al Long-term evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis for rheumatic heart disease Hsi-Yu Yu, MD a Yi-Lwun Ho, MD b Shu-Hsun Chu, MD c Yih-Sharng
More information2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD
2017 Cardiovascular Symposium CARDIAC SURGERY UPDATE: SMALLER INCISIONS AND LESS COUMADIN DAVID L. SAINT, MD David L Saint M.D. Tallahassee Memorial Hospital Southern Medical Group Division of Cardiothoracic
More informationby Age Groups W. R. E. Jamieson, M.D., L. J. Rosado, M.D., A. I. Munro, M.D., A. N. Gerein, M.D., L. H. Burr, M.D., R. T. Miyagishima, M.D.
Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Primary Tissue Failure (Structural Valve Deterioration) by Age Groups W. R. E. Jamieson, M.D., L. J. Rosado, M.D., A. I. Munro, M.D., A. N. Gerein, M.D.,
More informationRESEARCH AND REVIEWS: JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES
e-issn:2322-0139 RESEARCH AND REVIEWS: JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES Comparative Evaluation of Safety Outcomes of Different Prosthetic Valves in Indian Subjects. Kama Raval 1 *, Reena
More informationIntensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis: analysis of the GELIA Database (GELIA 4)
European Heart Journal Supplements (2001) 3 (Supplement Q), Q33 Q38 Intensity of oral anticoagulation after implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic prosthesis: analysis of the GELIA Database (GELIA 4)
More informationLONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER BIOLOGIC VERSUS MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN 841 PATIENTS
LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER BIOLOGIC VERSUS MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN 841 PATIENTS David S. Peterseim, MD Ye-Ying Cen, MA Srinivas Cheruvu, MHS Kevin Landolfo, MD Thomas M. Bashore, MD James E.
More informationORIGINAL PAPER. The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 78. 369 ~ 376, 2016 doi:10.18999/nagjms.78.4.369 ORIGINAL PAPER The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan
More informationAspirin or Coumadin as the Drug of Choice
Aspirin or Coumadin as the Drug of Choice for Valve Replacement with Porcine Bioprosthesis L. Nufiez, M.D., M. Gil Aguado, M.D., D. Celemin, M.D., A. Iglesias, M.D., and J. L. Larrea, M.D. ABSTRACT Eight
More informationClotting complications in patients with mechanical
Anticoagulation in Children With Mechanical Valve Prostheses Scott M. Bradley, MD, Robert M. Sade, MD, Fred A. Crawford, Jr, MD, and Martha R. Stroud, MS Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University
More informationClinical validation of a new drug seeking Food and
THE STATISTICIAN S PAGE Prosthetic Heart Valves: Objective Performance Criteria Versus Randomized Clinical Trial Gary L. Grunkemeier, PhD, Ruyun Jin, MD, and Albert Starr, MD Providence Health System,
More informationMitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Simultaneous Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Disease
Mitral Valve Repair Versus Replacement in Simultaneous Mitral and Aortic Valve Surgery for Rheumatic Disease Kenji Kuwaki, MD, PhD, Nobuyoshi Kawaharada, MD, PhD, Kiyofumi Morishita, MD, PhD, Tetsuya Koyanagi,
More informationT sors in the following aspects: the porcine aortic valve
Clinical and Hemodynamic Assessment of the Hancock I1 Bioprosthesis Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MSc, and Zhao Sun, MA Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Toronto Hospital and University of
More informationMechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement Is Not Superior in Patients Younger Than 65 Years Who Need Long-Term Anticoagulation
Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement Is Not Superior in Patients Younger Than 65 Years Who Need Long-Term Anticoagulation Ho Young Hwang, MD, PhD, Kyung-Hwan Kim, MD, PhD, Ki-Bong Kim, MD, PhD, and Hyuk
More informationSince Hufnagel and associates implanted a plastic ball
Evaluation of Valve Sound and Its Effects on ATS Prosthetic Valves in Patients Quality of Life Akira Sezai, MD, Motomi Shiono, MD, Yukihiko Orime, MD, Hiroaki Hata, MD, Shinya Yagi, MD, Nanao Negishi,
More informationMethods: Between 1975 and 2003, 267 isolated mitral mechanical prostheses were implanted. Follow-up reached patient-years.
Mitral mechanical replacement in young rheumatic women: Analysis of long-term survival, valve-related complications, and pregnancy outcomes over a 3707 patient-year follow-up Luca Salvatore De Santo, MD,
More informationEffect of Valve Suture Technique on Incidence of Paraprosthetic Regurgitation and 10-Year Survival
Effect of Valve Suture Technique on Incidence of Paraprosthetic Regurgitation and 10-Year Survival Sukumaran K. Nair, FRCS (C Th), Gauraang Bhatnagar, MBBS, Oswaldo Valencia, MD, and Venkatachalam Chandrasekaran,
More informationDespite improvements in valve design, stroke remains a serious
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease Bando et al Early and late stroke after mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis: Risk factor analysis of a 24-year experience Ko Bando, MD a Junjiro
More informationThe Medtronic-Hall (MH) tilting valve disk was first
Valvular Heart Disease Twenty-Five Year Experience With the Medtronic-Hall Valve Prosthesis in the Aortic Position A Follow-Up Cohort Study of 816 Consecutive Patients Jan L. Svennevig, MD, PhD; Michel
More informationMitroflow Synergy Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: 19 Years Experience With 1,516 Patients
Mitroflow Synergy Prostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: 19 Years Experience With 1,516 Patients Kazutomo Minami, MD, Armin Zittermann, PhD, Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup, MD, Heinrich Koertke, MD, and Reiner
More informationThe risk-benefit ratio of mitral valve operation is
Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: When Should We Operate? Malcolm J. R. Dalrymple-Hay, PhD, Mark Bryant, Richard A. Jones, MRCP, Stephen M. Langley, FRCS, Steven A. Livesey, FRCS, and James L. Monro,
More informationBioprostheses are prone to continuous degeneration
Twenty-Year Experience With the St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis in the Aortic Position Walter B. Eichinger, MD, Ina M. Hettich, MD, Daniel J. Ruzicka, MD, Klaus Holper, MD, Carolin Schricker, Sabine
More informationP substitutes since the introduction of the Ionescu-
Mitroflow Pericardial Valve: Long-Term Durability Daniel Y. Loisance, MD, Jean-Philippe Mazzucotelli, MD, Patrick C. Bertrand, MD, Philippe H. Deleuze, MD, and Jean-Paul Cachera, MD Department of Surgical
More informationHani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz
Hani K. Najm MD, Msc, FRCSC FACC, FESC President Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons Associate Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery King Abdulaziz Cardiac Centre Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Decision process for
More informationThe St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis
The St. Jude Medical Biocor Bioprosthesis Clinical Evidence of Long-term Durability Long-term Biocor Experience A Review and Comparative Assessment Long-term Biocor Stented Tissue Valve Studies Twenty-year
More informationD derly population has consisted chiefly of evaluation
Cardiac Valve Replacement in the Elderly: Clinical Perf ormance of Biological Prostheses W. R. Eric Jamieson, MD, Lawrence H. Burr, MD, A. Ian Munro, MD, Robert T. Miyagishima, MD, and Alfred N. Gerein,
More informationDOPPLER MICROEMBOLIC SIGNALS IN PATIENTS WITH TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF BILEAFLET VALVES
DOPPLER MICROEMBOLIC SIGNALS IN PATIENTS WITH TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF BILEAFLET VALVES Dimitrios Georgiadis, MD a Saskia Braun a Frank Uhlmann a Gillian M. Bernacca, PhD c Wilhelm Johannes Schulte-Mattler,
More informationClinical Practice Guidelines and the Under Treatment of Concomitant AF Vinay Badhwar, MD
Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Under Treatment of Concomitant AF Vinay Badhwar, MD Gordon F. Murray Professor and Chairman Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery WVU Heart and Vascular Institute
More informationThe use of mitral valve (MV) repair to correct mitral
Outcomes and Long-Term Survival for Patients Undergoing Repair Versus Effect of Age and Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Vinod H. Thourani, MD; William S. Weintraub, MD; Robert A. Guyton, MD;
More informationOutcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease
Outcomes of Mitral Valve Repair for Mitral Regurgitation Due to Degenerative Disease TIRONE E. DAVID, MD ; SEMIN THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 19:116-120c 2007 ELSEVIER INC. PRESENTED BY INTERN 許士盟 Mitral valve
More informationAortic valve replacement in predominant aortic stenosis: What is an appropriate size valve?
IJTCVS Joshi et al 141 Aortic valve replacement in predominant aortic stenosis: What is an appropriate size valve? Kishore Joshi, M.Ch., Sachin Talwar, M.Ch., Devagourou Velayoudham, M.Ch., Arkalgud Sampath
More informationSURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK
SURGICAL ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION DURING MITRAL VALVE SURGERY THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGICAL TRIALS NETWORK Marc Gillinov, M.D. For the CTSN Investigators ACC Late Breaking Clinical Trials March 16,
More informationExpanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated?
Expanding Relevance of Aortic Valve Repair Is Earlier Operation Indicated? RM Suri, V Sharma, JA Dearani, HM Burkhart, RC Daly, LD Joyce, HV Schaff Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
More informationMitral valve repair is the procedure of choice in SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE MITRAL VALVE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASE Terrence M. Yau, MD, MSc Yasser A. Farag El-Ghoneimi, MD Susan Armstrong, MSc Joan Ivanov, MSc Tirone
More informationThe pulmonary valve is the most common heart valve
Biologic versus Mechanical Valve Replacement of the Pulmonary Valve After Multiple Reconstructions of the RVOT Tract S. Adil Husain, MD, and John Brown, MD Indiana University School of Medicine, Department
More informationIncidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients receiving mitral Biocor porcine prosthetic valves
INTERVENTION/VALVULAR HEART DISEASE ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cardiology Journal 2016, Vol. 23, No. 2, 178 183 DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0011 Copyright 2016 Via Medica ISSN 1897 5593 Incidence of prosthesis-patient
More informationIndication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI
Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute Ming Zhang MD PhD Interventional Cardiology Structure Heart Disease Conflict of Interest None Starr- Edwards Mechanical
More informationReoperations after primary aortic valve replacement
Third-Time Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient s and Operative Outcome Kasra Shaikhrezai, MD, MRCS, Giordano Tasca, MD, FETCS, Mohamed Amrani, PhD, FETCS, Gilles Dreyfus, MD, FETCS, and George Asimakopoulos,
More informationPorcine bioprosthesis use for surgical treatment of
Fifteen-Year Clinical Experience With the Biocor Porcine Bioprostheses in the Mitral Position Kaan Kırali, MD, Mustafa Güler, MD, Altuğ Tuncer, MD, Bahadır Dağlar, MD, Gökhan İpek, MD, Ömer Işık, MD, and
More informationLate incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves q
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 25 (2004) 364 370 www.elsevier.com/locate/ejcts Abstract Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves q Marc Ruel
More informationProsthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is defined by any thrombus, in the
Prosthetic valve thrombosis: Twenty-year experience at the Montreal Heart Institute Nicolas Dürrleman, MD a Michel Pellerin, MD a Denis Bouchard, MD a Yves Hébert, MD a Raymond Cartier, MD a Louis P. Perrault,
More informationThe diameter of the aortic valve is in direct proportion
The CarboMedics Top-Hat Supraannular Prosthesis José M. Bernal, MD, Rafael Martin-Duran, MD, José M. Rabasa, MD, and José M. Revuelta, MD Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery and Echocardiography, Hospital
More informationLong-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience
Long-term results (22 years) of the Ross Operation a single institutional experience Authors: Costa FDA, Schnorr GM, Veloso M,Calixto A, Colatusso D, Balbi EM, Torres R, Ferreira ADA, Colatusso C Department
More informationSREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, INDIA
SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, INDIA - 695011 St. Jude Medical versus TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves at aortic/mitral postion Comparison
More informationDoes Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement?
Original Article Does Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Affect Long-term Results after Mitral Valve Replacement? Hiroaki Sakamoto, MD, PhD, and Yasunori Watanabe, MD, PhD Background: Recently, some articles
More informationControversy exists regarding which valve type is best
Treatment of Endocarditis With Valve Replacement: The Question of Tissue Versus Mechanical Prosthesis Marc R. Moon, MD, D. Craig Miller, MD, Kathleen A. Moore, BS, Phillip E. Oyer, MD, PhD, R. Scott Mitchell,
More information40 Years Experience in Mitral Valve Replacement Using Starr-Edwards, St. Jude Medical and ATS Valves
Original Article 40 Experience in Mitral Valve Replacement Using Starr-Edwards, St. Jude Medical and ATS Valves Akira Sezai, MD, Motomi Shiono, MD, Mitsumasa Hata, MD, Mitsuru Iida, MD, Masataka Yoda,
More informationSurgery for Valvular Heart Disease. Reoperation of Left Heart Valve Bioprostheses According to Age at Implantation
Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease Reoperation of Left Heart Valve Bioprostheses According to Age at Implantation Vincent Chan, MD, MPH; Tarek Malas, MD; Harry Lapierre, MD; Munir Boodhwani, MMSc, MD;
More information