Invitation to Tender

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Invitation to Tender"

Transcription

1 Invitation to Tender Contact: Project: Jacob Diggle, Research and Evaluation Officer Peer Support Programme Date: January 2015 Brief description: Mind has recently secured 3.2 million from the Big Lottery to increase access to peer support across England, evidence its effectiveness, and support its future sustainability. This programme will run for two years. One of the key objectives of the programme is to build the evidence base for peer support and we have dedicated significant resource to evaluation. We are seeking evaluation partners to deliver each of the programme s four evaluation strands: 1) Participant Outcomes 2) Process Evaluation 3) Economic Analysis 4) Commissioning Behaviour Applicants can submit bids for one or more strands. We strongly encourage partnership bids. Budget: Total budget of 280,000 (including VAT) Deadlines Deadline for applications: Partner(s) selected: Fieldwork start date: Fieldwork end date: Draft reports due: Final reports published: 20 th February th March 2015 May 2015 September 2016 November 2016 January

2 We re Mind, the mental health charity. We re here to make sure anyone with a mental health problem has somewhere to turn for advice and support. Our vision: We won t give up until everyone experiencing a mental health problem gets both support and respect. Our mission: We provide advice and support to empower anyone experiencing a mental health problem. We campaign to improve services, raise awareness, and promote understanding. Our values: Open We reach out to anyone who needs us. Together We re stronger in partnership. Responsive We listen, we act. Independent We speak out fearlessly. Unstoppable We never give up. Mind has a diverse portfolio of activities, including training, policy and campaigning, advice lines, and supporting our network of 150 local Minds. We also coordinate the delivery of large and innovative new services across our network. The local Mind network has a presence in every region in England and Wales, directly supporting around 420,000 people every year. By far the largest network of services and support for people with mental health problems in the country, its strength lies in its unique ability to draw on the skills and experience of a trusted national network, matched with strong local relationships, and the tailoring of services to local needs. 2

3 Programme Overview 1 in 4 people in England experience a mental health problem every year. The cost of this is huge; this week over 115 people will take their own lives, 2,000 people will be admitted to a mental health hospital, and 885,000 prescriptions will be issued for anti-depressants. The social exclusion associated with mental health problems disadvantages whole communities. We know that peer support helps to address this need. Peer support is based on the mutual exchange of advice and support amongst people with mental health problems. Previous research, including Mind s own inquiry, suggests that participants have more confidence about managing their condition, increased social capital, and reduced dependence on statutory services. Mind s aim is for everyone in England with a mental health problem to have access to peer support. With 3.2 million funding from Big Lottery, we have developed an ambitious programme that will raise awareness among 40,000 people, deliver online peer support to 6,000 people, and provide face-to-face peer support for 2,400 people. Over the next two years, we aim to achieve and evidence the following objectives: People who access peer support have improved mental health, more social capital, and greater levels of empowerment Grass roots peer-led groups and organisations have increased sustainability, leading to more high quality peer support Commissioners have increased awareness of the value and benefits of peer support and its contribution to commissioning outcomes People with mental health problems, their families and carers have more information about the benefits of peer support, leading to greater choice in how they live and recover Starting on 2 nd March 2015, the programme will be rolled out across nine regions of England. Working with a wide range of partners, including our five strategic partners (three local Minds, Depression Alliance, and Bipolar UK), we will: 1. Develop the peer support market o Establish nine strategic partnership peer support projects o Coach and mentor 216 grass roots peer support groups in total o Award grants to 45 of these grass roots organisations to fund effective delivery of peer support to new participants o Ensure peer support reaches black and minority ethnic (BME) and rural communities o Expand Elefriends (online peer support) 2. Increase the commissioning of effective community-based peer support o Evaluate the impact of peer support provision on user defined and clinical outcomes o Provide advice, information, and evidence for commissioners and policy makers o Facilitate events to bring commissioners and stakeholders together to share learning o Monitor commissioning behaviour, particularly the inclusion of peer support in the care pathway 3. Promote peer support o Raise awareness of the value of peer support and how to access it amongst 40,000 people o Provide information about peer support to people with experience of mental health problems, providers, and commissioners o Develop evaluation and influencing resources for the peer support sector 3

4 There is a split between national and local delivery of the programme. Local delivery will take place in a specified hub area in every region. Each hub organisation will co-ordinate capacity building activity including regular communications, networking meetings, and experts on call sessions. These hubs will be co-ordinated by a local Mind. Further, in the area there will be a peer support project, run by one of our strategic delivery partners, plus up to five grant-funded peer support projects, run by local groups and organisations. For our strategic partner work, Depression Alliance will lead in three regions, Bipolar UK in three regions, and a local Mind will lead in each of the remaining three regions. At a national level we will be expanding our existing delivery of online peer support, through our Elefriends platform. We will also be increasing the information available about peer support through a national communications campaign and on-going policy work to influence the views of commissioners. Local Delivery Organisational capacity building through mentoring and workshops One strategic partnership peer support project in each region, delivered over two years Grant funding for up to five projects, per region, run by a wide range of groups and organisations some specifically with a focus on BME and rural communities. Promotion of Mind s online peer support community, Elefriends, to local service users Facilitating networking events and opportunities to link with local commissioners Promoting work to local media National Delivery Delivering Elefriends online peer support community and support to new members Distributing information about peer support Encourage local and national media stories Commissioning and overseeing programme evaluation this includes disseminating evidence and evaluation tools Developing guidelines for local commissioners Carrying out face-to-face briefings with senior commissioners 4

5 Building a robust evidence base for peer support is one of the core objectives of this project and we have allocated significant resource to this task. Our evaluation should measure the impact of peer support on user-defined and clinical outcomes, identify the principles that underpin high quality peer support, evaluate our process for increasing the availability and quality of peer support, and monitor commissioning practices relating to peer support. Therefore, we are seeking partners to deliver four evaluation strands. Applicants can submit bids for one or more strands. Participant Outcomes This evaluation strand will measure changes in participant outcomes (e.g. self-esteem, confidence in managing condition, empowerment, leadership skills etc) related to both giving and receiving peer support. Economic Analysis This evaluation strand will model the health economic impact of each component of the programme. This may include cost-utility analysis, simple decision analytic modelling, or other methods (dependent on availability of data). Process Evaluation This evaluation strand seeks to understand the principles that underpin effective peer support and the best way to support and expand the sector. Commissioning Behaviour This evaluation strand will monitor the attitudes of commissioners to peer support in general, and supported programmes in particular. It will involve regular monitoring with particular focus on changes in behaviour after local hub events, CCG briefings, guidance for commissioners, and the publication of our research findings. The other objective of our peer support programme is to increase awareness of peer support. However, this section of the programme including targeted online and media work - will be evaluated internally. 5

6 Strand 1: Participant Outcomes The development of this programme involved extensive scoping research. We have now evaluated the impact of our existing peer support work, mapped national provision, and conducted an initial literature review. We have found that the value of peer support is demonstrated in a number of sources but the UK evidence base is still limited. Evaluation Strand 1 will make a major contribution to the understanding of this area, exploring changes in participant outcomes (e.g. self-esteem, confidence in managing condition, empowerment, leadership skills, volunteering in the future etc) related to both giving and receiving peer support. Our programme involves a number of different vehicles for providing peer support. The evaluation partner for this strand should use appropriate but comparable methods for each of these approaches. The research method(s) should be designed from the start with people who have lived experience of mental health problems and experience of giving and/or receiving peer support. The scale and range of research subjects (outlined below) will make this a challenging project. Therefore, our chosen partner must have experience of successfully delivering complex and sensitive community-based evaluation projects. Experience of working effectively with peer researchers, people with mental health problems, and people from BME communities will be considered favourably by the tender selection panel. Key Deliverables Literature Review We have completed an initial literature review of peer support interventions. However, our evaluation partner should conduct a thorough review within and beyond mental health to identify evidence gaps and ensure that the chosen methodology is appropriate and comparable. Online Mind operates a large online peer support forum, called Elefriends. The community has over 16,500 members and will attract 6,000 new members as a result of this programme. We will also make a number of changes to the site including locally tailored content for the nine programme sites. Our chosen evaluation partner should build on our existing evaluation of Elefriends - updating those findings and assessing the impact of changes to the site. Importantly, any evaluation of Elefriends impact must be comparable with evaluations of the other vehicles for delivering peer support. Grant Projects In order to increase the availability and quality of peer support, we will be awarding grants to 45 grassroots organisations to further develop their peer support work. The evaluation partner should measure the effectiveness of these activities and the changes in outcomes for participants. Some groups may differ in the way they deliver peer support (e.g. one-to-one, groups, gender-specific etc) and we would like to compare the effectiveness of these approaches. We have identified two audiences that are particularly underserved by existing peer support provision; people from BME communities and those living in rural areas. We will ensure that at least 18 grants target these priority audiences so that expansion of peer support reaches those who need it most. At Mind, we have seen some of our own peer support services organically evolve to bias the needs of particular groups; top line demographic information from our online peer support service (Elefriends) indicates that it is most successful in reaching an older, female population. We would be especially interested in understanding the relative impact of peer support on different demographics. 6

7 In particular, we would like to know whether peer support led and delivered by people from specific BME and rural communities leads to different outcomes. Strategic Delivery Partners We will be delivering the programme in partnership with commissioning stakeholders, grass roots organisations, and strategic partners. Depression Alliance and Bipolar UK are established providers of peer support for people with mental health problems (running over 180 existing groups). They will each work in three regions, establishing new peer support groups in at least two. We will also be partnering with three local Minds to deliver the strategic aspect of this work. They will establish new projects in each of the remaining three regions. Our evaluation partner will work with each of these partners to evaluate the impact of their projects. In total, the nine strategic projects and 45 grant funded projects will provide face-to-face peer support to at least 2,400 people over the course of the programme. This is in addition to the 6,000 receiving online peer support. Control Group We would like to establish a representative control group of people experiencing mental health problems but not accessing peer support as part of this programme. The control will help us to isolate the impact of this programme s activities from other variables. The delivery of our strategic partners could allow for a wait list control. Alternatively, a control group could be recruited in a region outside the project s scope. These control participants would not be receiving peer support as part of our programme but they could still be receiving informal peer support from friends, family etc. We will work with our Research Advisory Group and evaluation partner to define selection criteria and ethical controls. Economic Data Collection The third strand of the Peer Support evaluation focuses on the economic impact of our programme. This is dependent upon data about participant s use of statutory services, clinical outcomes, and referral pathways. Whilst the economic analysis will be conducted by our partner for Strand 3, the majority of data collection will be the responsibility of our partner for Strand 1. We require both partners (if they are separate organisations) to work closely together to co-ordinate this data collection and analysis. Peer Researchers Mind strongly believes that people's experience of mental health problems and service provision must inform and influence everything we do. Therefore, our evaluation partners may wish to collaborate with user/survivor researchers as part of this work. We will specifically require our evaluation partner to train and coordinate peer researchers as part of their data collection strategies. Mind has employed this peer research model in a number of projects, with great success. These researchers must be people who have given or received peer support as part of this programme. They will be responsible for recruiting participants and collecting data via questionnaires. Each Peer Researcher should receive suitable training on how to recruit participants and conduct research. They must be able to access on-going advice and support. In addition to their help with measuring the impact of peer support groups, we want to understand the effect of this role on peer researchers (e.g. self-confidence, social capital). Therefore, a tailored assessment of their outcomes should also be made by our evaluation partner. 7

8 Legacy Tools We require our evaluation partner to develop tools that can be sustainably used by the participating organisations after the end of the programme. These tools should allow groups to monitor on-going progress against the baselines established by this evaluation, evidence their impact to commissioners, and continue to refine their work. We would also like to share these tools with the rest of the peer support sector. Outcomes Our evaluation partner will be responsible for devising their research methodology and the outcomes they will measure. However, a number of key areas for the funder and Mind are: Mental wellbeing Social capital Self-efficacy Attitudes towards mental health Confidence to give and receive peer support Use of statutory health services Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychosis (if appropriate) Project Management Programme Manager, Mind Research and Evaluation Officer, Mind Research Advisory Group (RAG) Lived Experience Reading Panel The Peer Support Programme Manager will oversee delivery of the whole project. They will be responsible for on-going co-ordination of the evaluation partners and ensuring that they fulfil contractual obligations. They will also provide regular updates about the progress of each evaluation strand to the Programme Management Board comprised of senior staff from across Mind. The evaluation partner will be commissioned and supported by Mind s Research and Evaluation Officer. This officer will ensure that the research is consistent with Mind s evaluation framework and strategy. They will also ensure consistency and co-operation between different evaluation strands. The Research Advisory Group (RAG) will be comprised of experienced researchers with expertise in peer support and mental health. The RAG will help to shape the programme s evaluation plan and provide comments on chosen partners research methodologies. They will also provide an on-going advisory role throughout the project and provide feedback on research reports. The Reading Panel will be made up of people with lived experience of mental health problems who have given and/or received peer support through this programme. They will include participants from a range of the peer support activities (e.g. grass roots, strategic delivery partners, online). This group will review the final research reports. Timeline Below are some of the key milestones and deadlines. Our chosen evaluation partner will have to convert these into a more detailed project plan. Activity Deadline 8

9 ITT deadline 20 th February 2015 Tender selection panels 4 th 6 th March 2015 Partner confirms methodology with Mind 20 th March 2015 Fieldwork begins April 2015 Peer researchers recruited and trained June July 2015 Fieldwork ends September 2016 Draft report due November 2016 Reading Panel provides comments November 2017 Final reports published from all strands January 2017 Budget The budget for this evaluation strand is 160,000. This budget includes all travel expenses and VAT. Each applicant must make their own decision about what is a financially viable costing for the project. This could include full cost recovery or exclude some costs (e.g. on-costs). Whilst we will not be selecting partners solely on cost, value for money is one of our selection criteria. Applicants may also recover costs from other sources. However, supplementary funding cannot have conflicting research aims or requirements. Any additional funding must be specified in your proposal and is subject to written permission by Mind. Applicants who are submitting a bid as a partnership should specify the cost breakdown and key deliverables of each partner. Application Details Please outline the following: Your understanding of our research needs Your experience of evaluating mental health services Your experience of evaluating peer support services, if applicable Your plan for engaging people with lived experience in all aspects of your work Your proposed research methodology (including sampling approach) Your proposal for recruiting and managing a control group Your plan for evaluating the grant funded projects, focusing on BME and rural communities Your plan to recruit, train, and co-ordinate project-based peer researchers Your proposal for developing legacy tools Your partners and their roles, if applicable Your approach to project management and quality assurance An indicative budget for this piece of work, outlining the resource required for each stage of the project. (Please show the day rate for each team member) Ability to start fieldwork by May 2015 Please include CVs of the research staff who will be responsible for this work Please supply an electronic copy of your proposal by 12 noon, 20 th February 2015 Selection Process The following criteria will be used to evaluate the tenders: Criteria Weighting % Track record of excellence 20 Value for money 20 9

10 Experience working with people with mental health issues 15 Experience working with BME and/or rural communities 15 Alignment with Mind s values and principles 10 Experience working with peer researchers 10 Creativity 10 Submissions should be made electronically to the Jacob Diggle, Research and Evaluation Officer Questions may be submitted to the same address. In the interest of fairness, face-to-face meetings will not be given at this stage. The selection panel will include representatives of the Peer Support Programme team. The chosen partner will be selected by 6 th March

11 Strand 2: Process Evaluation Whilst developing this new programme, we have carried out research into the state of peer support provision in England. Our inquiry has shown peer support to be a heterogeneous practice, with many groups having emerged organically and operated in isolation. Whilst there is a growing understanding of what underpins effective peer support, we wish to develop this further by providing practical information and organisational support. Practitioners are concerned that applying a rigid structure to peer support groups would, whilst improving consistency, risk undermining the diversity of peer leadership that is so intrinsic to their value. This conclusion has been echoed in our review of the published evidence base. One proposed solution is to identify peer support principles that can underpin a variety of models. Our evaluation partner for Strand 2 will be responsible for identifying these key principles of effective peer support. Consistent with this approach, our programme will provide grants and capacity building to strengthen existing groups and organisations delivering peer support, rather than dictating their structure or programmes. We would like to evaluate the impact of this support on organisational sustainability. We would also like to examine how groups and organisations can build effective working relationships with local commissioners in particular through the strategic delivery partner projects (three local Minds and two other mental health charities). Our programme will take place in nine regions, each co-ordinated by a local hub organisation. Each region will include a strategic project (delivered by one of our strategic partners) and up to five grant-funded projects. This is in addition to delivery of online peer support, media influencing, and work with commissioners in each area and nationally. We require an evaluation partner to assess the efficiency and efficacy of our partnerships and organisational support. Importantly, this evaluation strand is not concerned with participant outcomes (see Strand 1), but understanding what principles underpin effective peer support, what capacity building is most useful and effective, and how groups can develop strategic relationships with commissioners. Key Deliverables Literature Review We have completed an initial literature review of peer support interventions. Our evaluation partner for Strand 1 will also be undertaking a comprehensive literature review. Our evaluation partner for Strand 2 should build on this research and conduct a supplementary review, focusing on the principles of peer support and improving the organisational sustainability of small heterogeneous groups. Their priority should be to identify evidence gaps and ensure that their chosen methodology is appropriate and comparable. Models of Peer Support Peer support is a very heterogeneous practice. We would like our evaluation partner to map these different models of peerness. We are particularly interested in capturing the different mechanisms used by peer supporters to engage people and provide support. We would also like to investigate how they draw on their own lived experience. Finally, we would like to understand whether the approach taken by each group is influenced by the nature of training, supervision, and support. This research will be informed by the literature review but it should also include depth interviews with group leaders and participants, feedback from hub events, views of commissioners etc. Key Principles 11

12 The diversity of peer support provision is one of its great strengths. However, practitioners have asked us to identify the common principles that underpin successful delivery. These might include recovery focus, mutuality, authenticity etc. Our evaluation partner must identify the common principles that underpin the success of grantees, strategic partners, and the online community. This will help to inform the development and sustainability of peer support provision beyond the life of this programme and to encourage high quality provision. Relationships with Commissioners We will be delivering the programme in partnership with commissioning stakeholders, grass roots peer support organisations, and our strategic partners (including Depression Alliance and Bipolar UK). Depression Alliance and Bipolar UK are established providers of peer support for people with mental health problems (running over 180 existing groups). Our evaluation partner for Strand 2 must evaluate how these different groups and organisations build relationships with commissioners. We are particularly interested to find out whether strategic partners and grantees - who will receive guidelines and attend network events focused on commissioning - become more effective at building strong relationships with commissioners. Organisational Sustainability We will award grants to 45 grassroots organisations to further develop their peer support delivery. Grants will average 12,000 and we estimate awarding five grants per region. The grass roots grants recipients will also have access to up to four days support from experts by experience to improve their sustainability. These experts will provide face-to-face, telephone, and support to help with problem solving, sharing learning across grants programmes, and reporting for funders. We will provide networking opportunities and a telephone mentoring service to 162 peer support groups some of whom will be receiving financial support. This support will be delivered through a hub in each of the programme s nine regions. Each hub, co-ordinated by a local Mind, will also host three events to bring together groups and organisations in their area who are interested in developing peer support. The events will include the nine strategic projects, grant recipients, other groups and organisations interested in developing peer support, local commissioners, and other stakeholders. In addition, these hubs will be responsible for developing tools that enable groups and organisations that deliver peer support to engage with local commissioners. Finally, the local hubs will host oneto-one expert on call sessions in each area. These sessions will support groups and organisations that do not receive grants to develop their projects and organisations e.g. governance, fundraising, marketing and communications, employment, and volunteer management etc. The specific areas of support will be determined by local need. We would like to understand the impact of these capacity building activities on organisational sustainability. In particular, we would be interested in comparing the success of groups that engage with hub activity compared to those that do not. Using depth interviews with group leaders and other stakeholders (e.g. GPs, local Minds), our evaluation partner should also be able to assess whether our support has any impact on how these organisations are perceived by local stakeholders. We would like our evaluation partner to provide on-going feedback to participants, in addition to an end of project report. This formative feedback will help them to refine their activity and help us improve our support offer before the end of the programme. Outcomes 12

13 Our evaluation partner would be responsible for devising their research methodology and the outcomes they will measure. However, a number of key areas for the funder and Mind are: Principles underpinning effective peer support Organisational sustainability of grant recipients Organisational sustainability of groups engaging with hub activities communications, experts on call, networking meetings Confidence of organisations to deliver peer support after hub events Strength of relationships with commissioners Strength of relationships with and between local groups and organisations Project Management Programme Manager, Mind Research and Evaluation Officer, Mind Research Advisory Group (RAG) Lived Experience Reading Panel The Peer Support Programme Manager will oversee delivery of the whole project. They will be responsible for on-going co-ordination of the evaluation partners and ensuring that they fulfil contractual obligations. They will also provide regular updates about the progress of each evaluation strand to the Programme Management Board comprised of senior staff from across Mind. The evaluation partner will be commissioned and supported by Mind s Research and Evaluation Officer. This officer will ensure that the research is consistent with Mind s evaluation framework and strategy. They will also ensure consistency and co-operation between different evaluation strands. The Research Advisory Group (RAG) will be comprised of experienced researchers with expertise in peer support and mental health. The RAG will help to shape the programme s evaluation plan and provide comments on chosen partners research methodologies. They will also provide an on-going advisory role throughout the project and provide feedback on research reports. The Reading Panel will be made up of people with lived experience of mental health problems who have given and/or received peer support through this programme. They will include participants from a range of peer support groups (e.g. grass roots, strategic delivery partners, online). This group will review the final research reports. Timeline Below are some of the key milestones and deadlines. Our chosen evaluation partner will have to convert these into a more detailed project plan. Activity Deadline ITT deadline 20 th February 2015 Tender selection panels 4 th 6 th March 2015 Partner confirms methodology with Mind 20 th March 2015 Fieldwork begins May 2015 Peer researchers recruited and trained June - July 2015 Fieldwork ends September 2016 Draft report due November 2017 Reading Panel provides comments November 2017 Final reports published from all strands January 2017 Budget 13

14 The budget for this evaluation strand is 60,000. This budget includes all travel expenses and VAT. Each applicant must make their own decision about what is a financially viable costing for the project. This could include full cost recovery or exclude some costs (e.g. on-costs). Whilst we will not be selecting partners solely on cost, value for money is one of our selection criteria. Applicants may also recover costs from other sources. However, supplementary funding cannot have conflicting research aims or requirements. Any additional funding must be specified in your proposal and is subject to written permission by Mind. Applicants who are submitting a bid as a partnership should specify the cost breakdown and key deliverables of each partner. Application Details Please outline the following: Your understanding of our research needs Your experience of evaluating mental health services Your experience of completing process evaluations Your experience of evaluating peer support services, if applicable Your experience of working with health commissioners Your plan for engaging people with lived experience in all aspects of your work Your proposed research methodology (including sampling approach) Your partners and their roles, if applicable Your approach to project management and quality assurance An indicative budget for this piece of work, outlining the resource required for each stage of the project. (Please show the day rate for each team member) Please include CVs of the research staff who will be responsible for this work Please supply an electronic copy of your proposal by 12 noon, 20 th February 2015 Selection Process The following criteria will be used to evaluate the tenders: Criteria Weighting % Track record of excellence 25 Value for money 20 Experience conducting process evaluations 15 Alignment with Mind s values and principles 10 Experience working with people with mental health issues 10 Experience working with BME and/or rural communities 10 Creativity 10 Submissions should be made electronically to the Jacob Diggle, Research and Evaluation Officer Questions may be submitted to the same address. In the interest of fairness, face-to-face meetings will not be given at this stage. The selection panel will include representatives from the Peer Support Programme team. The chosen partner will be selected by 6 th March

15 Strand 3: Economic Analysis We are not just interested in improved outcomes for users of peer support. We would also like to understand the broader impact on the health economy of each region. This is a key tool for demonstrating the value of peer support to commissioners. Key Deliverables Economic Modelling Using the data from evaluation Strands 1 and 2, we are looking for an evaluation partner to model the health economic impact of each component of the programme. This may include cost-utility analysis, simple decision analytic modelling, or other methods (dependent on availability of data). The regional nature of our peer support programme should facilitate comparison between the economic impact of local peer support economies that are receiving support (mentoring or grants) and those that are not. We are keen to commission our evaluation partner for Strand 3 early on in the programme in order to ensure that we collect suitable data in Strand 1 and 2 to facilitate a comprehensive economic analysis. Data Collection This evaluation strand is dependent upon data about participant s use of statutory services, clinical outcomes, and referral pathways. Whilst the economic analysis will be conducted by our partner for Strand 3, the majority of data collection will be the responsibility of our partners for Strand 1 and 2. We require both partners (if they are separate organisations) to work closely together to co-ordinate this data collection and analysis. We will be recruiting our partner for Strand 3 well in advance of field work starting in order to facilitate this information exchange. Literature Review We have completed an initial literature review of peer support interventions. However, our evaluation partner should conduct a thorough review within and beyond mental health to identify evidence gaps and ensure that the chosen methodology is appropriate and comparable. Our evaluation partners in other strands will also be undertaking literature reviews. Our evaluation partner for Strand 3 should build on this research and conduct a supplementary review, focusing on the economic effect of social support and the role of non-clinical interventions in a local health economy. Patterns of Referral In addition to modelling the overall effect of our programme on the regional health economy, we would like our evaluation partner for Strand 3 to map patterns of referral throughout the programme. For example, how people with mental health problems get referred to peer support groups, how individuals accessing face-to-face support use online peer support and vice versa, how participants interact with statutory services whilst receiving support etc. This mapping of people s pathways through care and peer support will be helpful for modelling the economic impact of the programme, but it will also inform service design and the development of support packages (e.g. information provision, face-to-face support etc). Outcomes Our evaluation partner will be responsible for devising their research methodology and the outcomes they will measure. However, a number of key areas for the funder and Mind are: 15

16 Cost/benefit of investment in peer support Cost/benefit of different models of delivering peer support Efficacy of participant referral routes through peer support and other services Changes in use of statutory services as a result of peer support Project Management Programme Manager, Mind Research and Evaluation Officer, Mind Research Advisory Group (RAG) Lived Experience Reading Panel The Peer Support Programme Manager will oversee delivery of the whole project. They will be responsible for on-going co-ordination of the evaluation partners and ensuring that they fulfil contractual obligations. They will also provide regular updates about the progress of each evaluation strand to the Programme Management Board comprised of senior staff from across Mind. The evaluation partner will be commissioned and supported by Mind s Research and Evaluation Officer. This officer will ensure that the research is consistent with Mind s evaluation framework and strategy. They will also ensure communication and co-operation between different evaluation strands. The Research Advisory Group (RAG) will be comprised of experienced researchers with expertise in peer support and mental health. The RAG will help to shape the programme s evaluation plan and provide comments on chosen partners research methodologies. They will also provide an on-going advisory role throughout the project and provide feedback on research reports. The Reading Panel will be made up of people with lived experience of mental health problems who have given and/or received peer support through this programme. They will include participants from a range of peer support groups (e.g. grass roots, strategic delivery partners, online). This group will review the final research reports. Timeline Below are some of the key milestones and deadlines. Our chosen evaluation partner will have to convert these into a more detailed project plan. The phasing of this evaluation strand can be negotiated with our chosen partner, subject to availability of data. Activity Deadline ITT deadline 20 th February 2015 Tender selection panels 4 th 6 th March 2015 Partner confirms methodology with Mind and phasing of Strand 3 20 th March 2015 research agreed Economic analysis begins May 2016 Draft report due November 2016 Reading Panel provides comments November 2016 Final reports published from all strands January 2017 Budget The budget for this evaluation strand is 40,000. This budget includes all travel expenses and VAT. 16

17 Each applicant must make their own decision about what is a financially viable costing for the project. This could include full cost recovery or exclude some costs (e.g. on-costs). Whilst we will not be selecting partners solely on cost, value for money is one of our selection criteria. Applicants may also recover costs from other sources. However, supplementary funding cannot have conflicting research aims or requirements. Any additional funding must be specified in your proposal and is subject to written permission by Mind. Applicants who are submitting a bid as a partnership should specify the cost breakdown and key deliverables of each partner. Application Details Please outline the following: Your understanding of our research needs Your experience of evaluating mental health services Your experience of completing economic analysis of voluntary sector services Your experience of evaluating peer support services, if applicable Your plan for engaging people with lived experience in all aspects of your work Your proposed research methodology (including sampling approach) Your partners and their roles, if applicable Your approach to project management and quality assurance An indicative budget for this piece of work, outlining the resource required for each stage of the project. (Please show the day rate for each team member) Please include CVs of the research staff who will be responsible for this work Please supply an electronic copy of your proposal by 12 noon, 20 th February 2015 Selection Process The following criteria will be used to evaluate the tenders: Criteria Weighting % Track record of excellence 30 Value for money 20 Experience working with people with mental health issues 15 Alignment with Mind s values and principles 15 Experience plotting service user journeys 10 Creativity 10 Submissions should be made electronically to the Jacob Diggle, Research and Evaluation Officer Questions may be submitted to the same address. In the interest of fairness, face-to-face meetings will not be given at this stage. The selection panel will include representatives from the Peer Support Programme team. The chosen partner will be selected by 6 th March

18 Strand 4: Commissioning Behaviour To increase the sustainability of peer support, we need to engage an array of statutory commissioning stakeholders. At a local level these will include Health Watch, Health and Wellbeing Boards, Mental Health Trusts, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), and social care commissioners. A core objective of our programme is build the peer support evidence to further engage these groups. Key Deliverables Benchmarking We are looking for an evaluation partner to monitor the attitudes of commissioners to peer support in general, and supported programmes in particular. Our evaluation partner should assess current levels of peer support commissioning. This would give a baseline for the outcome of commissioners' likelihood to fund peer support in the future. Regular Monitoring We require regular monitoring with particular focus on changes in commissioning behaviour after local hub events, commissioner briefings, and the publication of our guidance documents and research findings. This monitoring could take a range of forms including interviews, surveys, and document reviews. There are a wide range of potential commissioners in each area. However, we are particularly interested in the behaviour of CCGs as they have the largest budgets for commissioning this type of service. Local Hub Guidance Our chosen evaluation partner for Strand 4 must provide guidance to the local hubs on commissioner s attitudes, commissioning trends, and other influencing recommendations. This will help local hubs to develop tools for grass roots peer support organisations to effectively engage with local commissioners during the lifetime of the programme. Outcomes Our evaluation partner would be responsible for devising their research methodology and the outcomes they will measure. However, a number of key areas for the funder and Mind are: Commissioners awareness of peer support Commissioners perception of the efficacy of peer support Commissioners perception of the cost effectiveness of peer support Commissioners perception of Mind Commissioners perception of Mind s strategic partners Commissioners perception of grassroots peer support groups and organisations Commissioners likelihood to commission peer support in the future Inclusion of peer support in the care pathway Project Management Programme Manager, Mind The Peer Support Programme Manager will oversee delivery of the whole project. They will be responsible for on-going co-ordination of the evaluation partners and ensuring that they fulfil contractual 18

19 Research and Evaluation Officer, Mind Research Advisory Group (RAG) Lived Experience Reading Panel obligations. They will also provide regular updates about the progress of each evaluation strand to the Programme Management Board comprised of senior staff from across Mind. The evaluation partner will be commissioned and supported by Mind s Research and Evaluation Officer. This officer will ensure that the research is consistent with Mind s evaluation framework and strategy. They will also ensure consistency and co-operation between different evaluation strands. The Research Advisory Group (RAG) will be comprised of experienced researchers with expertise in peer support and mental health. The RAG will help to shape the programme s evaluation plan and provide comments on chosen partners research methodologies. They will also provide an on-going advisory role throughout the project and provide feedback on research reports. The Reading Panel will be made up of people with lived experience of mental health problems who have given and/or received peer support through this programme. They will include participants from a range of peer support groups (e.g. grass roots, strategic delivery partners, online). This group will review the final research reports. Timeline Below are some of the key milestones and deadlines. Our chosen evaluation partner will have to convert these into a more detailed project plan. Activity Deadline ITT deadline 20 th February 2015 Tender selection panels 4 th 6 th March 2015 Partner confirms methodology with Mind 20 th March 2015 Strand 4 fieldwork begins May 2015 Strand 4 fieldwork ends September 2016 Draft report due November 2016 Reading Panel provides comments November 2016 Final reports published from all strands January 2016 Budget The budget for this evaluation strand is 20,000. This budget includes all travel expenses and VAT. Each applicant must make their own decision about what is a financially viable costing for the project. This could include full cost recovery or exclude some costs (e.g. on-costs). Whilst we will not be selecting partners solely on cost, value for money is one of our selection criteria. Applicants may also recover costs from other sources. However, supplementary funding cannot have conflicting research aims or requirements. Any additional funding must be specified in your proposal and is subject to written permission by Mind. Applicants who are submitting a bid as a partnership should specify the cost breakdown and key deliverables of each partner. Application Details Please outline the following: 19

20 Your understanding of our research needs Your experience of monitoring the attitude of health commissioners Your experience of providing public affairs guidance to community organisations Your plan for engaging people with lived experience in all aspects of your work Your proposed research methodology (including sampling approach) Your partners and their roles, if applicable Your approach to project management and quality assurance An indicative budget for this piece of work, outlining the resource required for each stage of the project. (Please show the day rate for each team member) Please include CVs of the research staff who will be responsible for this work Please supply an electronic copy of your proposal by 12 noon, 20 th February 2015 Selection process The following criteria will be used to evaluate the tenders: Criteria Weighting % Track record of excellence 25 Value for money 20 Experience working with health commissioners 15 Alignment with Mind s values and principles 15 Experience providing public affairs guidance to small organisations 15 Creativity 10 Submissions should be made electronically to the Jacob Diggle, Research and Evaluation Officer Questions may be submitted to the same address. In the interest of fairness, face-to-face meetings will not be given at this stage. The selection panel will include representatives from the Peer Support Programme team. The chosen partner will be selected by 6 th March

Community Innovation Fund. Guidelines

Community Innovation Fund. Guidelines Community Innovation Fund Guidelines 02 February 2015 1 Community Innovation Fund (CIF)- Guidance Notes 1. Introduction The purpose of the Community Innovation Fund (CIF) is to support the strategic aim

More information

MOVEMBER FUNDED MEN S HEALTH INFORMATION RESOURCES EVALUATION BRIEF. 1 P age

MOVEMBER FUNDED MEN S HEALTH INFORMATION RESOURCES EVALUATION BRIEF. 1 P age MOVEMBER FUNDED MEN S HEALTH INFORMATION RESOURCES EVALUATION BRIEF 1 P age Contents 1. Purpose... 3 2. Background... 3 3. beyondblue, the national depression and anxiety initiative... 4 4. Movember funded

More information

Service Coordinator British Red Cross and Macmillan Support at Home Service

Service Coordinator British Red Cross and Macmillan Support at Home Service Service Coordinator British Red Cross and Macmillan Support at Home Service Job Profile Salary band 2b Reference Area / Department Health & Social Care Territory / Division Northern. Area 2.3 Flexible

More information

Report by the Comptroller and. SesSIon January Improving Dementia Services in England an Interim Report

Report by the Comptroller and. SesSIon January Improving Dementia Services in England an Interim Report Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 82 SesSIon 2009 2010 14 January 2010 Improving Dementia Services in England an Interim Report 4 Summary Improving Dementia Services in England an Interim

More information

Welcome. A Legacy of Success. Brighter Futures Together

Welcome. A Legacy of Success. Brighter Futures Together Welcome I welcome you to the publication of our Strategic Plan 2015 2018 Brighter Futures Together on behalf of the Board of Kerry Diocesan Youth Service [KDYS]. A Legacy of Success The Diocese of Kerry

More information

North Somerset Autism Strategy

North Somerset Autism Strategy North Somerset Autism Strategy Approved by: Ratification date: Review date: September 2017 1 Contents 1 Introduction and background... 3 2 Defining Autism...Error! Bookmark not defined. 3 National and

More information

Driving Improvement in Healthcare Our Strategy

Driving Improvement in Healthcare Our Strategy Driving Improvement in Healthcare Healthcare Improvement Scotland 2014 First published April 2014 The contents of this document may be copied or reproduced for use within NHSScotland, or for educational,

More information

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Needs Assessment and Engagement Invitation to Tender Tayside Health Board Area

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Needs Assessment and Engagement Invitation to Tender Tayside Health Board Area Scotland Ratho Park, 88 Glasgow Road Ratho Station Newbridge EH28 8PP Tel: 0131 335 4050 msscotland@mssociety.org.uk mssociety.org.uk/scotland Helpline: 0808 800 8000 Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Needs Assessment

More information

Project Manager. ROTA Job Description. Purpose:

Project Manager. ROTA Job Description. Purpose: ROTA Job Description Project Manager Purpose: The Project Manager will lead on the overall logistics of the project including all monitoring and evaluation and the production of a project toolkit. The

More information

The Children and Social Work Act The role of voluntary sector CSE services in new safeguarding arrangements

The Children and Social Work Act The role of voluntary sector CSE services in new safeguarding arrangements THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE: RESEARCHING CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, VIOLENCE AND TRAFFICKING The Children and Social Work Act The role of voluntary sector CSE services in new safeguarding arrangements January

More information

British Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020

British Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020 British Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020 1 P age Contents Introduction 3 1. Developing and influencing local and national policy for stroke 5 2. Providing expert advice on all aspects

More information

The role of cancer networks in the new NHS

The role of cancer networks in the new NHS The role of cancer networks in the new NHS October 2012 UK Office, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7UQ Questions about cancer? Call the Macmillan Support Line free on 0808 808 00 00 or visit macmillan.org.uk

More information

National Dementia Vision for Wales Dementia Supportive Communities

National Dementia Vision for Wales Dementia Supportive Communities National Dementia Vision for Wales Dementia Supportive Communities Crown Copyright 2011 WAG11-11223 F641 Introduction In Wales, we are justifiably proud of the communities we have built, just as we are

More information

Patient and Public Involvement in JPND Research

Patient and Public Involvement in JPND Research Patient and Public Involvement in JPND Research A user-friendly guide for applicants to JPND Calls for proposals January 5 2015 Created in conjunction with DenDRoN, United Kingdom Purpose The purpose of

More information

Exhibition Curator Brief

Exhibition Curator Brief Exhibition Curator Brief Purpose of the Role Screen South is looking to recruit an experienced Exhibition Curator to devise and deliver a ground-breaking disability history exhibition across three sites,

More information

You said, We did. How your comments and feedback have helped us to add value and improve local services

You said, We did. How your comments and feedback have helped us to add value and improve local services ,. How your comments and feedback have helped us to add value and improve local services A lot of our members have advised that although the CCG spends a lot of time engaging with stakeholders, it does

More information

Working Better Together on Safeguarding: Annual Reports of the Bradford Safeguarding Children Board (BSCB) and the Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB)

Working Better Together on Safeguarding: Annual Reports of the Bradford Safeguarding Children Board (BSCB) and the Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB) Report of the Director of Health and Wellbeing and the Director of Children s Services to the meeting of Bradford and Airedale Health and Wellbeing Board to be held on 29 th November 2016. Subject: O Working

More information

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Tackling Indigenous Smoking Programme

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Tackling Indigenous Smoking Programme Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Tackling Indigenous Smoking Programme 30 June 2016 Introduction... 3 Context the TIS programme... 4 2.1 TIS programme objectives... 5 2.2 The delivery of the

More information

WHY DO WE NEED TO ENGAGE WITH OUR COMMUNITIES?

WHY DO WE NEED TO ENGAGE WITH OUR COMMUNITIES? WHY DO WE NEED TO ENGAGE WITH OUR COMMUNITIES? Our communities have a central role to play in influencing and shaping what happens in Barnsley. In our corporate plan we recognise that our role as a local

More information

Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report. Prostate Cancer UK

Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report. Prostate Cancer UK Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report Prostate Cancer UK July 2014 Contents Executive summary... 2 Summary of the research... 2 Main findings... 2 Lessons learned...

More information

Macmillan Cancer Support s offer to support the development of - Cancer information and support and benefits advice services for people affected by

Macmillan Cancer Support s offer to support the development of - Cancer information and support and benefits advice services for people affected by Macmillan Cancer Support s offer to support the development of - Cancer information and support and benefits advice services for people affected by cancer www.macmillan.org.uk/servicesimpact Page 1 of

More information

Alcohol Research UK Research Strategy

Alcohol Research UK Research Strategy Alcohol Research UK Research Strategy 2015-18 Supporting research to reduce alcohol-related harm www.alcoholresearchuk.org Alcohol Research UK Research Strategy 2015-18 Foreword Professor Alan-Maryon Davies

More information

Thank you for your interest in the role of Chief Executive Officer for Somerset and Avon Rape and Sexual Abuse Support (SARSAS).

Thank you for your interest in the role of Chief Executive Officer for Somerset and Avon Rape and Sexual Abuse Support (SARSAS). Chief Executive Officer Job Information Pack 2018 Thank you for your interest in the role of Chief Executive Officer for Somerset and Avon Rape and Sexual Abuse Support (SARSAS). Following a successful

More information

Support Facilitator Partners in Recovery - Ashfield

Support Facilitator Partners in Recovery - Ashfield Position Description September 2016 Position description Support Facilitator Partners in Recovery - Ashfield Section A: position details Employment Status Classification and Salary Location: Hours: Contract

More information

Cancer Awareness & Early Diagnosis Project Examples. Location: Camden (intervention area) and Kensington & Chelsea (control area), London

Cancer Awareness & Early Diagnosis Project Examples. Location: Camden (intervention area) and Kensington & Chelsea (control area), London PROJECT TITLE: Improving breast awareness in women aged 45-54 Location: Camden (intervention area) and Kensington & Chelsea (control area), London PROJECT DETAILS Problem addressed: Breast cancer is now

More information

Co-ordinated multi-agency support for young carers and their families

Co-ordinated multi-agency support for young carers and their families Practice example Co-ordinated multi-agency support for young carers and their families What is the initiative? A partnership between a young carers service and a council Who runs it? Off The Record s Young

More information

Request for Proposals: Consultancy Evaluation, Toolkits and Economic Impact of the 22nd International AIDS Conference

Request for Proposals: Consultancy Evaluation, Toolkits and Economic Impact of the 22nd International AIDS Conference Request for Proposals: Consultancy Evaluation, Toolkits and Economic Impact of the 22nd International AIDS Conference Proposals will be accepted until Friday 6 April 2018 1. About the International AIDS

More information

CANDIDATE PACK. Trustee

CANDIDATE PACK. Trustee CANDIDATE PACK Trustee Candidate Pack 2014 Background Information Introduction The Motor Neurone Disease (MND) Association is the only national charity in England, Wales and Northern Ireland that funds

More information

The Vision. The Objectives

The Vision. The Objectives The Vision Older people participate to their fullest ability in decisions about their health and wellbeing and in family, whānau and community life. They are supported in this by co-ordinated and responsive

More information

Trustee Application Pack

Trustee Application Pack Trustee Application Pack Dear Thank you for your interest in becoming a Trustee of Hillingdon Mind. This pack includes some information which we hope will assist you in deciding whether to submit an application:

More information

Aiming High Our priorities by 2020 HALFWAY THERE. Our priorities by 2020

Aiming High Our priorities by 2020 HALFWAY THERE. Our priorities by 2020 HALFWAY THERE Our priorities by 2020 2 In 2015 we published a vision for where we would like CLIC Sargent to be by 2025, Aiming High: Our ambitions for children and young people with cancer. We have already

More information

Mental Health & Wellbeing Strategy

Mental Health & Wellbeing Strategy getting it right for e ery child in Aberdeenshire Mental Health & Wellbeing Strategy 2016-2019 NHS Grampian 2 Our vision is that all children and young people are mentally flourishing! Introduction and

More information

Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body

Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body To be held on Tuesday 24 February 2015 commencing at 13:30 at the Vassall Centre, Gill Avenue, Bristol, BS16 2QQ Title: OFSTED Report Agenda

More information

Local Action Plan WALES

Local Action Plan WALES 1 Local Action Plan 2017-2019 WALES Background As of 1 st January 2017 there were 230 people known to the Association with MND, 6 MND Association branches and, 14 regularly active Multi- Disciplinary teams

More information

Effective Support for Self Help / Mutual Aid Groups (ESTEEM) Stage 1 Interim Report: Executive Summary

Effective Support for Self Help / Mutual Aid Groups (ESTEEM) Stage 1 Interim Report: Executive Summary Effective Support for Self Help / Mutual Aid Groups (ESTEEM) Stage 1 Interim Report: Executive Summary 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the self help / mutual aid groups who gave up their time

More information

Support and Connect. Project and outcome examples

Support and Connect. Project and outcome examples Support and Connect Project and outcome examples The aim of this document is to support you whilst you develop your application to Support and Connect. We assess applications against the following: o The

More information

RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE. Mental Health Carers NSW (MHCN) MHCN Workshop Facilitator

RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE. Mental Health Carers NSW (MHCN) MHCN Workshop Facilitator RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE MHCN Workshop Facilitator MHCN is part of COLLECTIVE PURPOSE COLLABORATION with CONTENTS 1 RECRUITMENT PROCESS... 2 2 ORGANISATION PROFILE... 3 3 POSITION DESCRIPTION...

More information

Martin Foley, Minister for Mental Health Message to the mental health sector

Martin Foley, Minister for Mental Health Message to the mental health sector Martin Foley, Minister for Mental Health Message to the mental health sector June 2015 There is a lot happening in mental health and wellbeing policy at both state and Commonwealth levels. The Andrews

More information

Sustainability Learning Review 2015

Sustainability Learning Review 2015 Sustainability Learning Review 2015 Barnardo s (PATHS programme) Summary Developed originally in the USA, PATHS is a universal programme for improving the social and emotional skills of children across

More information

Chair of Trustees Role briefing pack. January 2017

Chair of Trustees Role briefing pack. January 2017 Chair of Trustees Role briefing pack January 2017 Message from the RUSS Chair Thank you for your interest in becoming Chair of the Rural Urban Synthesis Society (RUSS). This is an opportunity for someone

More information

MAKING AN IMPACT AT EVERY LEVEL

MAKING AN IMPACT AT EVERY LEVEL MAKING AN IMPACT AT EVERY LEVEL MAKING AN IMPACT AT EVERY LEVEL CONTENTS A B C SPORTED MEMBERS PARTNERS GOVERNMENT POLICY 10 & SPORT SECTOR CASE STUDY: SPORTEDUCATE THE WAY FORWARD: TOWARDS OUR TENTH ANNIVERSARY

More information

Brighton & Hove Food Partnership: Harvest

Brighton & Hove Food Partnership: Harvest Growing Health Food growing for health and wellbeing Brighton & Hove Food Partnership: Harvest Brighton & Hove Growing Health Case Study Health area: Healthy eating, physical activity and mental wellbeing

More information

South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Excellence in dementia care across general hospital and community settings. Competency framework

South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Excellence in dementia care across general hospital and community settings. Competency framework South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Excellence in dementia care across general hospital and community settings. Competency framework 2013-2018 Written and compiled by Helen Robinson-Clinical Educator

More information

Framework and Action Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorders Services in Saskatchewan. Fall 2008

Framework and Action Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorders Services in Saskatchewan. Fall 2008 Framework and Action Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorders Services in Saskatchewan Fall 2008 Overview The Framework and Action Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorders Services in Saskatchewan is the result of

More information

JOB DESCRIPTION. ImROC Business Manager (Mental Health Network) and Senior. Policy Manager (NHS Clinical Commissioners)

JOB DESCRIPTION. ImROC Business Manager (Mental Health Network) and Senior. Policy Manager (NHS Clinical Commissioners) JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Location: Salary: Reports To: Accountable To: Team Administrator London 21,630 (plus London weighting) ImROC Business Manager (Mental Health Network) ImROC Business Manager (Mental

More information

empower youth mentor

empower youth mentor empower youth mentor Mission We foster and facilitate high quality, safe mentoring relationships for children in need. About Us Big Brothers Big Sisters of Waterloo Region (BBBSWR) is a community organization

More information

National Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme

National Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme National Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme Introduction to and supporting documentation for VALUE BASED TRANSFORMATION FUNDING SITE SELECTION December 2016 1 Introduction and Contents The Planning

More information

Increasing the uptake of MMR in London: executive summary of findings from the social marketing project, November 2009

Increasing the uptake of MMR in London: executive summary of findings from the social marketing project, November 2009 Increasing the uptake of MMR in London: executive summary of findings from the social marketing project, November 2009 1 Introduction & approach The London Social Marketing Unit (LSMU joined in April 2009)

More information

HOW ARE WE DOING? HEALTHWATCH CROYDON SURVEY OF STATUTORY AND VOLUNTARY PARTNERS JULY 2017

HOW ARE WE DOING? HEALTHWATCH CROYDON SURVEY OF STATUTORY AND VOLUNTARY PARTNERS JULY 2017 HOW ARE WE DOING? HEALTHWATCH CROYDON SURVEY OF STATUTORY AND VOLUNTARY PARTNERS JULY Executive Summary The intention of the survey was to get feedback from statutory and voluntary sector partners of Healthwatch

More information

RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE SENIOR PROJECT OFFICER MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTION & ADVOCACY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION NSW. Contents

RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE SENIOR PROJECT OFFICER MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTION & ADVOCACY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION NSW. Contents RECRUITMENT INFORMATION PACKAGE SENIOR PROJECT OFFICER MENTAL HEALTH PROMOTION & ADVOCACY MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION NSW Contents 1. Recruitment process 2. Organisation profile 3. Job description 4. Advertisement

More information

Peer Support Worker. Position description. Section A: Position details. Organisational context

Peer Support Worker. Position description. Section A: Position details. Organisational context Position Description February 18 Position description Peer Support Worker Section A: Position details Position title: Employment Status: Classification and Salary: Location: Hours: Peer Support Worker

More information

NHS DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAMME: Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in England

NHS DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAMME: Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in England NHS DIABETES PREVENTION PROGRAMME: Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in England WHO WE ARE Public Health England (PHE) is an executive agency of the Department of Health. We protect and improve the nation's health

More information

VIOLENCE PREVENTION ALLIANCE TERMS OF REFERENCE

VIOLENCE PREVENTION ALLIANCE TERMS OF REFERENCE VIOLENCE PREVENTION ALLIANCE TERMS OF REFERENCE Background Each year, around 520,000 people die as a result of interpersonal violence, which includes child maltreatment, youth violence, intimate partner

More information

The Prime Minister s Challenge on Dementia. Lorraine Jackson Deputy Director: Domestic Dementia Policy Department of Health

The Prime Minister s Challenge on Dementia. Lorraine Jackson Deputy Director: Domestic Dementia Policy Department of Health The Prime Minister s Challenge on Dementia Lorraine Jackson Deputy Director: Domestic Dementia Policy Department of Health 1 Costs and impact of dementia Estimated 676,000 people in England with dementia,

More information

Bradford District Community Advice Network (CAN)

Bradford District Community Advice Network (CAN) Bradford District Community Advice Network (CAN) March 2015 Nick Hodgkinson, Project Co-ordinator The CAN in a nutshell registered charity, association CIO since Oct 2014, with organisational (not individual)

More information

2 WHO 1 Who do you need to involve? a specific condition, service or treatment

2 WHO 1 Who do you need to involve? a specific condition, service or treatment PATIENT AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLANNING TEMPLATE Instructions: Patient engagement is about meaningful engagement of patients/public in the research process (not just as subjects of research). This template

More information

SOLIHULL BEREAVEMENT COUNSELLING SERVICE (SBCS)

SOLIHULL BEREAVEMENT COUNSELLING SERVICE (SBCS) SOLIHULL BEREAVEMENT COUNSELLING SERVICE (SBCS) REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2013 2016 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solihull Bereavement Counselling Service (SBCS) is a charity which provides specialist bereavement

More information

Job Description & Person Specification Palliative Care Research Network Project Manager

Job Description & Person Specification Palliative Care Research Network Project Manager Job Description & Person Specification Palliative Care Research Network Project Manager Job Title: Project Manager (0.5WTE Specified Purpose Contract) Accountable to: Head of Institute of All Ireland Institute

More information

Changing Lives Nationwide

Changing Lives Nationwide Changing Lives Nationwide Strategic Plan 2015-2018 1. Introduction 2. Overall themes for 2015-18 3. Vision & principles 4. Strategic planning 5. Operational priorities & activities 6. About OCD & OCD Action

More information

Call for Proposals: Demonstration Projects and Champion Development for Providers to address Type 2 Diabetes Prevention

Call for Proposals: Demonstration Projects and Champion Development for Providers to address Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Call for Proposals: Demonstration Projects and Champion Development for Providers to address Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Introduction The American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) recently began our

More information

The LiveWell Journey: Transforming South Yorkshire Housing Association s Care and Support Business

The LiveWell Journey: Transforming South Yorkshire Housing Association s Care and Support Business Case Study 108 The LiveWell Journey: Transforming South Yorkshire Housing Association s Care and Support Business This case study provides insight into the critical success factors that have led South

More information

Beyond the Diagnosis. Young Onset Dementia and the Patient Experience

Beyond the Diagnosis. Young Onset Dementia and the Patient Experience Beyond the Diagnosis Young Onset Dementia and the Patient Experience November 2017 1 Contents Executive Summary... 4 Recommendations... 4 1. Introduction... 6 2. Background & Rationale... 6 3. Methodology...

More information

Transforming Care Together Patient centred approach

Transforming Care Together Patient centred approach Transforming Care Together Patient centred approach Transforming Care Together is the name for a new partnership agreement between three NHS Trusts in the Birmingham and Black Country area: Birmingham

More information

Autism Action Network Charter

Autism Action Network Charter Autism Action Network Charter Introduction The Autism Action Network is an exciting opportunity for you to be part of a passionate community committed to helping people with autism to live the life they

More information

About the OCD Support Group Charter

About the OCD Support Group Charter About the OCD Support Group Charter OCD Action is the national charity for people affected by Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). The Charity has been working with the network of independent local OCD

More information

Peer Work Leadership Statement of Intent

Peer Work Leadership Statement of Intent Peer Work Leadership Statement of Intent A National Professional Association for Mental Health Peer Workers Peer work leaders from Queensland, Victoria and NSW and colleagues from the USA participated

More information

Simple steps to start your own peer support group

Simple steps to start your own peer support group About Suffolk Mind Suffolk Mind is a registered charity affiliated to the national charity Mind and is committed to improving the lives of people with mental health issues in Suffolk. All of our services

More information

WESTERN SYDNEY DIABETES PLAN 2017 PLANNING NOW FOR A HEALTHIER FUTURE

WESTERN SYDNEY DIABETES PLAN 2017 PLANNING NOW FOR A HEALTHIER FUTURE WESTERN SYDNEY DIABETES PLAN 2017 PLANNING NOW FOR A HEALTHIER FUTURE 2 PLAN 2017 OVERVIEW The Western Sydney Diabetes Plan 2017 document outlines the blueprint of how we will be delivering the Western

More information

ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT WHAT WE DO

ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT WHAT WE DO Our Strategic Plan 2013-2015 WHAT WE DO Homeless Link is the national membership charity for organisations working directly with homeless people in England. With over 500 members, we work to make services

More information

Chief Development Officer National Brain Tumor Society

Chief Development Officer National Brain Tumor Society Send Nominations or Cover Letter and Resume to: Lisa Vuona Vice President 617-262-1102 lvuona@lllsearches.com Chief Development Officer National Brain Tumor Society Newton, MA http://braintumor.org/ The

More information

CORPORATE PLANS FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND LOOKED ATER CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE

CORPORATE PLANS FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND LOOKED ATER CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE NHS Highland Board 28 March 2017 Item 4.11 CORPORATE PLANS FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND LOOKED ATER CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE Report by Dr Stephanie Govenden Lead Doctor Child Protection and Looked After Children

More information

South Lanarkshire Council. Autism Strategy. Action Plan. Update April 2014

South Lanarkshire Council. Autism Strategy. Action Plan. Update April 2014 South Lanarkshire Council Autism Strategy Action Plan Update April 2014 Ten Indicators for current best practice in the provision of effective Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) services 1. A local Autism

More information

We welcome any news, developments and thoughts that you would like to share regarding peer support in your area.

We welcome any news, developments and thoughts that you would like to share regarding peer support in your area. Peer2Peer Newsletter March 2013 When someone has spent an awful long time being misunderstood in the mental health system, peer support is like a breath of fresh air and can be lifesaving. I have found,

More information

What needs to happen in Scotland

What needs to happen in Scotland What needs to happen in Scotland We ve heard from over 9,000 people across the UK about what it is like to live with diabetes and their hopes and fears for the future; people of all ages, ethnicities and

More information

Cited in the Prime Minister s Challenge on Dementia 2020, the Dementia Roadmap supports better provision of post diagnosis support.

Cited in the Prime Minister s Challenge on Dementia 2020, the Dementia Roadmap supports better provision of post diagnosis support. Dementia Roadmap subscription package Thank you for registering your interest in developing a Dementia Roadmap for your locality. This briefing provides information about the Dementia Roadmap subscription

More information

WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN WALES? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE

WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN WALES? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN WALES? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Incidence of cancer is rising, with one in two people born after 1960 expected to be diagnosed

More information

All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dementia inquiry into dementia and co-morbidities - call for evidence

All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dementia inquiry into dementia and co-morbidities - call for evidence All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dementia inquiry into dementia and co-morbidities - call for evidence Date: October 2015 All rights reserved. Third parties may only reproduce this paper or parts of it

More information

MENTAL HEALTH, THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR & THE NHS

MENTAL HEALTH, THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR & THE NHS MENTAL HEALTH, THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR & THE NHS The Community Living Well Service: Self Care/Community Support (including non-mental health services) and Peer Support For Adults with Long Term Mental Health

More information

UNICEF Nepal Country Office (NCO) Terms of Reference

UNICEF Nepal Country Office (NCO) Terms of Reference UNICEF Nepal Country Office (NCO) Terms of Reference National Consultancy for National Integrated Micronutrients Guideline Development and updating training package on Micronutrients (Vitamin A Deficiency,

More information

Ending Gang and Youth Violence. Programme for Young Women who are Involved in or at Risk of Involvement in Gangs and Violent Crime.

Ending Gang and Youth Violence. Programme for Young Women who are Involved in or at Risk of Involvement in Gangs and Violent Crime. Programme for Young Women who are Involved in or at Risk of Involvement in Gangs and Violent Crime. Background The Ending Gang Youth Violence Programme is a 1 year funded Home Office project aimed at reducing

More information

London Association of Directors of Public Health Priorities for Collaboration September 2017 September 2018

London Association of Directors of Public Health Priorities for Collaboration September 2017 September 2018 ADPH London London Association of Directors of Public Health Priorities for Collaboration September 2017 September 2018 Improving and protecting the health of Londoners 1 Table of Contents Welcome 3 About

More information

Volunteering and Heritage A Heritage Lottery Fund perspective. Miranda Stearn

Volunteering and Heritage A Heritage Lottery Fund perspective. Miranda Stearn Volunteering and Heritage A Heritage Lottery Fund perspective Miranda Stearn National Lottery where the money goes National Lottery Good Causes Heritage receives 5.6p of every 1.00 spent on lottery tickets

More information

Invisible Islington: living in poverty in inner London Executive summary of a report for Cripplegate Foundation by Rocket Science (UK)

Invisible Islington: living in poverty in inner London Executive summary of a report for Cripplegate Foundation by Rocket Science (UK) We transform lives for people in Islington. We re independent, and trusted. The money we give improves lives for local people, building a better future for us all. Cripplegate Foundation Helping since

More information

OCD SUPPORT GROUP CHARTER

OCD SUPPORT GROUP CHARTER OCD SUPPORT GROUP CHARTER 2014-2015 Table Of Contents About the OCD Support Group Charter Page: 3 The Charter: Aims of an OCD support group Page: 5 How OCD support groups are governed Page: 6 How OCD support

More information

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan Strategic Plan 2011-2016 Improving Care and Social Services in Wales Strategic Plan 2011-2016 For further information please visit: www.cssiw.org.uk ISBN 978 0 7504 7009 4 Crown copyright 2012 WG14652

More information

OUT NORTH WEST ROLE DESCRIPTION

OUT NORTH WEST ROLE DESCRIPTION OUT NORTH WEST ROLE DESCRIPTION Job Title: Out North West Youth Development Officer Responsible to: Health and Wellbeing Services Manager (The Rainbow Project) and Youth Development Manager (Cara-Friend)

More information

TB/HIV Care s Experience Setting up PrEP Sites and Engaging Potential Service Users. John Mutsambi and Peggy Modikoe TB/HIV Care

TB/HIV Care s Experience Setting up PrEP Sites and Engaging Potential Service Users. John Mutsambi and Peggy Modikoe TB/HIV Care TB/HIV Care s Experience Setting up PrEP Sites and Engaging Potential Service Users John Mutsambi and Peggy Modikoe TB/HIV Care Session Objectives Objectives Define the scope of activities to prepare for

More information

Young Bristol 2020 Strategy

Young Bristol 2020 Strategy Young Bristol 2020 Strategy Welcome Since the opening of Bristol s first Boys Club in 1928, Young Bristol has evolved into one of Bristol s leading youth charities, providing critical out-of-school services

More information

Report on the Impact of Mental Health Charities on Irish Society. Report on the Impact of Mental Health Charities on Irish Society June 2017

Report on the Impact of Mental Health Charities on Irish Society. Report on the Impact of Mental Health Charities on Irish Society June 2017 Report on the Impact of Charities on Irish Society Report on the Impact of Charities on Irish Society June 2017 1 Persuasion Republic Report on the Impact of Charities on Irish Society Contents Introduction

More information

The Global AIESEC Leadership Initiative. Leadership for a Better World

The Global AIESEC Leadership Initiative. Leadership for a Better World The Global AIESEC Leadership Initiative 00 Leadership for a Better World 1" The Global AIESEC Leadership Initiative AIESEC youth and AIESEC alumni develop and activate leaders for a better world. Developing

More information

FINANCE COMMITTEE DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND AGEING POPULATION INQUIRY SUBMISSION FROM NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS SOCIETY

FINANCE COMMITTEE DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND AGEING POPULATION INQUIRY SUBMISSION FROM NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS SOCIETY FINANCE COMMITTEE DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AND AGEING POPULATION INQUIRY SUBMISSION FROM NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS SOCIETY What is your view of the effects of the demographic change and an ageing population on the

More information

Scaling up in Gender Analysis Workshop

Scaling up in Gender Analysis Workshop Scaling up in Gender Analysis Workshop Consultant project brief for workshop facilitator Women s Health West, on behalf of the Preventing Violence Together Partnership, seeks a workshop facilitator for

More information

Guiding support for family carers

Guiding support for family carers Submission by Care Alliance Ireland to the Department of Education and Skills on the Statement of Strategy 2016 2018 Background Care Alliance Ireland is the National Network of Voluntary Organisations

More information

Scenarios: Sufficiency, range and complexity of work in voluntary organisations

Scenarios: Sufficiency, range and complexity of work in voluntary organisations Scenarios: Sufficiency, range and complexity of work in voluntary organisations In their final portfolios, NQSWs in the voluntary sector produced a range of evidence taken from their experience of complex

More information

Services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage in England and Wales EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage in England and Wales EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Services for women experiencing multiple disadvantage in England and Wales EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction Mapping the Maze was established by AVA (Against Violence and Abuse) and Agenda, the alliance

More information

IDU Outreach Project. Program Guidelines

IDU Outreach Project. Program Guidelines Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue dureé Prepared by: AIDS Bureau Revision Date: April 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction...1 1.1 Program Goals... 2 1.2

More information

OXFORDSHIRE MIND JOB DESCRIPTION WELLBEING SERVICE WORKER. 28 days plus bank holidays (per annum)

OXFORDSHIRE MIND JOB DESCRIPTION WELLBEING SERVICE WORKER. 28 days plus bank holidays (per annum) OXFORDSHIRE MIND JOB DESCRIPTION WELLBEING SERVICE WORKER HOURS: SALARY: CONTRACT: HOLIDAYS: PENSION: PROBATIONARY PERIOD: ACCOUNTABLE TO: PLACE OF WORK: 37 hours per week 19,939-23,935 (SCP 21-27) per

More information