British Fertility Society. Clinical guidelines
|
|
- Audra Manning
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Guidance producer: British Fertility Society Guidance Product: Clinical guidelines Date: 13 January 2011 Final Accreditation Report
2 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation... 3 Reapplication for accreditation... 6 Appendix A: NHS Evidence accreditation analysis... 7 Appendix B: Bibliography Appendix C: Advisory Committee members, external advisers and NHS Evidence accreditation team... 19
3 Introduction The NHS Evidence Accreditation Scheme recognises organisations that demonstrate high standards in producing health or social care guidance. Users of the accredited guidance can therefore have high confidence in the quality of the information. Organisations can publicly display a seal of approval called an Accreditation Mark for 3 years after their processes have been accredited. The process for accrediting producers of guidance and recommendations for practice is described in the process manual 1. Accreditation recommendation NHS Evidence has not accredited the process used by the British Fertility Society to produce clinical guidelines. Background to the guidance producer The British Fertility Society is the national professional body for those working in the reproductive medicine field. The Society s membership is multidisciplinary and includes physicians, counsellors, embryologists, andrologists, endocrinologists, nurses, and other professionals from the field of reproductive medicine. The Policy and Practice Committee authors approximately three guidelines per annum for the British Fertility Society, some of which are written in collaboration with other professional bodies including the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1
4 Summary The Advisory Committee considered that the processes used by the British Fertility Society to produce clinical guidelines demonstrated compliance with 15 out of the 25 accreditation criteria, did not meet one and found nine not fully met. The process guide used by the British Fertility Society to produce guidelines is titled British Fertility Society: Policy and Practice Committee Guideline Development This reflects the practice that was used for the previous 3 years to develop guidance. In 2009 the process was formalised into a written document. Although the British Fertility Society produces approximately three guidelines a year this process has not yet been used to produce new or revise existing guidance. Some aspects of the British Fertility Society s guideline development processes are clearly documented and thorough. Guidance examples demonstrate implementation of many of the elements of the formal documented process. However not fully met processes exist for patient involvement, updating guidance, how the potential for bias in guidance is accounted for along with a lack of a clear conflict of interest policy. Furthermore, the process used by the British Fertility Society does not take into account barriers to implementation. The British Fertility Society acknowledged these weaknesses in its process, and has outlined improvements that it intends to make. Although welcome, these improvements are not yet in place or implemented and therefore do not resolve any of the unmet or not fully met criteria. There are several specific areas that did not meet the required standard and where improvement is needed: Address organisational and financial barriers to implementing guidance. Provide details of the full membership (not just for lead authors) for each Guideline Development Group. Define and improve the involvement of patients through relevant patient organisations such as Infertility Network UK.
5 Update the process to explain how recommendations balance the health benefits, side effects and risks. Include a review date for new guidance in the process and ensure it is clearly stated in guidance. Ensure that the process requires the date of evidence search and review to be stated in guidelines. Include a section in guidelines expressly for patients and amend processes accordingly. Ensure that an audit and monitoring policy is in place. Include a conflict of interest statement in all guidelines. Ensure that the process clearly explains how bias should be addressed when reaching recommendations in guidelines. The need to make improvements is recognised by the British Fertility Society. The proposed changes should be incorporated into an updated process document, and fully implemented into all new or updated guidance. David Haslam Chair, Advisory Committee December 2010
6 Reapplication for accreditation Following a final where accreditation has not been granted, guidance from the non-accredited producer will still be available on the NHS Evidence site but will not be identified by the accreditation mark graphic. Guidance producers that are not accredited following the accreditation process have the opportunity to reapply from 1 year after the previous assessment. It is assumed that the organisation will have addressed any concerns highlighted in the original assessment before reapplying. The NHS Evidence team will provide detailed feedback and advice on areas where improvement is required to meet the criteria in a future application.
7 Appendix A: NHS Evidence accreditation analysis The Advisory Committee considered the following analysis of the guidance producer s compliance with NHS Evidence accreditation criteria, which covers six discrete domains. The full analysis leading to the accreditation is shown below. Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation Does the guidance producer have a policy in place and adhered to that requires them to explicitly detail: 1.1 Overall objective The 2009 process document 1 states the primary aim of guidance in the Introduction section. Specific objectives for each guidance example 2,3 are also provided. Scope and purpose 1.2 The clinical, healthcare or social questions covered The process document 1 addresses the criterion in section 3 Formulation of clinical questions. The use of the patient intervention comparison and outcome (PICO) framework is suggested to help define questions. Detailed clinical questions are specified throughout the body of guidance examples 2,3 in both instances - evidence and/or recommendation grades are shown in each case.
8 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 1.3 Population and/or target audience to whom the guidance applies The process document 1 explains that guidelines provide systematically developed recommendations that assist clinicians and patients in making s about appropriate treatments for specific conditions. Membership of the British Fertility Society is multidisciplinary. The process document explains that clinical questions should state both patient groups and relevant outcomes. Guidance examples 2,3 reveal the target audience and detail the relevant patient population. 1.4 Guidance includes clear recommendations in reference to specific clinical, healthcare or social circumstances The process document 1 states that, where possible, recommendations should reproduce the precision of the clinical questions. Recommendations are assessed for strength and quality of evidence, and are apparent for a range of specific clinical circumstances. Numerous clinical stages such as diagnosis, interventions and prognosis are covered within each guidance example 2,3
9 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation Does the guidance producer have a policy in place and adhered to that means it includes: Stakeholder involvement 2.1 Individuals from all relevant stakeholder groups, including patient groups, in developing guidance It was not clear from the process manual 1 whether patient representatives are included in the Guideline Development Group for each guideline. Patient involvement through consultation with Infertility Network UK (the patients main support group) could not be confirmed from guidance examples 2,3. The British Fertility Society stated that it would in future include greater detail of the individuals in each Guideline Development Group and also involve patients through Infertility Network UK. This is an important development, which will require integrating into the process documentation and be clearly evident within future guidance produced. However, without evidence of implementation in guidance the criterion is regarded as not fully met. Not fully met
10 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 2.2 Patient and service user representatives and seeks patients views and preferences in developing guidance Consultation with Infertility Network UK could not be confirmed from guidance examples 2,3. No evidence of patients experiences, perspectives or expectations appears to be considered by the Guideline Development Group. Not fully met The British Fertility Society agreed to involve patients more in developing guidance via Infertility Network UK but, without evidence of implementation of this update to its process, the criterion is considered to be not fully met. The process manual 1 needs to be formally updated with the changes the British Fertility Society has proposed. 2.3 Representative intended users in developing guidance. The process document 1 and guidance examples 2,3 clearly define target users of guidance so it is apparent whether recommendations are relevant to them. The process of modification based on feedback from British Fertility Society membership prior to National Executive Committee approval and publication constitutes involvement of representative intended users.
11 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation Does the guidance producer have a clear policy in place that: 3.1 Requires the guidance producer to use systematic methods to search for evidence and provide details of the search strategy The process document 1 covers the procedures for searching for evidence. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text keywords are employed when relevant. The process recommends that databases searched, along with search terms used, should be stated in guidance produced. Guidance examples 2,3 both state search terms utilised along with databases queried. Rigour of development 3.2 Requires the guidance producers to state the criteria and reasons for inclusion or exclusion of evidence identified by the evidence review The process manual 1 explains that evidence regarded as poor quality should be excluded from the list of studies on which recommendations will be made. It states that the number of studies included and rejected should be documented. Both examples 2,3 specify inclusion and exclusion criteria. A process is apparent with implementation demonstrated. 3.3 Describes the strengths and limitations of the body of evidence and acknowledges any areas of uncertainty The process document 1 explains that previous guidelines used the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) tool. For all new guidance produced the British Fertility Society has adopted the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology to grade evidence. Both guidance examples 2,3 used the AHCPR grading system, and specify levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.
12 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 3.4 Describes the method used to arrive at recommendations (for example, a voting system or formal consensus techniques like Delphi consensus) Recommendations are usually based on value judgements of guideline outcomes according to the process document 1. Previous guidelines have been developed using the AHCPR tool. The British Fertility Society stated that the SIGN grading system will be used for new guidance. Evidence from one guidance example 2 shows recommendations are reviewed and agreed using informal consensus. 3.5 Requires the guidance producers to consider the health benefits against the side effects and risks in formulating recommendations Guidance examples 2,3 show that the health benefits are balanced against the likely side effects. However only an implied process exists and the criterion is considered to be not fully met. The British Fertility Society explained that it will amend its process to include direction about how to balance the health benefits, side effects and risks which is a positive measure. Until this is formally added into an updated process document the criterion is not fully met. Not fully met 3.6 Describes the processes of external peer review Guidance is revised in line with peer review comments prior to internal review and publication in the Human Fertility journal. Although guidance examples 2,3 do not provide evidence of implementation of the peer review process, there is a clearly described process 1.
13 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 3.7 Describes the process of updating guidance and maintaining and improving guidance quality The process manual 1 states that guidance is considered for review and update, and outlines a policy for scheduled revision. However no review information could be located in guidance examples 2,3 and review dates are not provided. The British Fertility Society stated that it will ensure a 5-year review date is incorporated in future guidance produced. Not fully met Does the guidance producer ensure that: Clarity and presentation 4.1 Recommendations are specific, unambiguous and clearly identifiable The process document 1 explains that recommendations need to be accurate and easy to understand in order to change practice. The process document clearly states that any ambiguity in the language used could result in confusion at implementation. The guidance examples 2,3 both provide evidence that the process is being implemented and clearly detail specific recommendations. 4.2 Different options for the management of the condition or options for intervention are clearly presented Guidance examples 2,3 confirm that options for investigations, comparison treatments and drug regimens are considered when relevant.
14 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 4.3 The date of search, the date of publication or last update and the proposed date for review are clearly stated The process document 1 does not specify all the date information required. The date of publication was present in guidance examples 2,3 but it was not clear when literature searches had been performed or when the scheduled dates for review were to commence. Not fully met The British Fertility Society stated that it will provide the date of search and review for each guideline produced. However, the provision of this new information needs to be formally incorporated into an updated process and evidence of implementation within guidance needs to be demonstrated. 4.4 The content of the guidance is suitable for the specified target audience. If patients or service users are part of this audience, the language should be appropriate. The process document 1 states that guidelines assist clinicians and patients in making s about appropriate treatments. However it could not been confirmed whether the content of guidance examples 2,3 is suitable for patients or carers. No separate patient versions of guidance are available. The British Fertility Society indicated that an additional paragraph specifically tailored for lay people will be included in future guidance. Not fully met
15 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation Does the guidance producer routinely consider: 5.1 Publishing support tools to aid implementation of guidance The process document 1 states that where appropriate, algorithms can be created. These are essentially schematic summaries of recommendations support tools for integration and implementation of evidence into clinical practice. The process document explains that a Summary of Recommendations section within guidance alerts the reader to key findings which also aids implementation. Applicability No costing tools or clinical care algorithms were included in the guidance examples 2,3. However examination of additional guidance confirmed that some guidelines (such as Elective Single Embryo Transfer: Guidelines for Practice Sept 2008 ) include a summary of recommendations section, a management algorithm and specific tools to assist with implementation. 5.2 Discussion of potential organisational and financial barriers in applying its recommendations The process document 1 and guidance examples 2,3 do not address the issue of organisational or financial barriers affecting implementation of recommendations. The British Fertility Society stated that organisational and financial barriers will be considered in future guidance when required. Criterion not met
16 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 5.3 That their guidance is current, with review criteria for monitoring and/or audit purposes within each product. The process document 1 states that audit and implementation should be included in guidance and that the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology s Understanding Audit - Clinical Governance Advice No. 5 review criteria for monitoring/auditing is recommended. However, Its Not fully met application within guidance examples 2,3 is not apparent. 6.1 Ensure editorial independence from the funding body The British Fertility Society website reveals that the organisation is essentially two limited companies, the British Fertility Society and the British Fertility Society Educational Charity Ltd. The association funds guidance production on an in-house basis. Editorial independence 6.2 Demonstrate transparency about the funding mechanisms for its guidance The British Fertility Society website shows that the two principal sponsors are pharmaceutical companies as specified at Sponsors provide an educational grant for general support of the Society s educational activities. There are also six corporate members of the society which contribute to the British Fertility Society Educational Charity. The agreements are transparent.
17 Criterion Evidence for meeting the criterion Accreditation 6.3 Record and state any potential conflicts of interest of individuals involved in developing the recommendations One of the two guidance examples 2,3 includes a declaration of interest statement. This implies a process exists for conflict of interests despite not being defined in the process document. The British Fertility Society stated that it aims to include a conflict of interest statement in each guidance document. This is a constructive development but because the process is not explicit and it is inconsistently implemented, the criterion is considered to be not fully met. Not fully met 6.4 Take account of any potential for bias in the conclusions or recommendations of the guidance The process document 1 considers the effects of bias at a number of points along the guidance authoring route. These include methods for literature searching and selection, grading of evidence and peer review. However it was not clear whether the process in place would alleviate potential bias or offset the lack of a conflict of interest policy, especially because pharmaceutical industry sponsorship is evident in some circumstances. Guidance examples did not address the issue of bias 2,3. Not fully met 1 British Fertility Society: Policy and Practice Committee Guideline Development Impact of obesity on female reproductive health: British Fertility Society, Policy and Practice Guidelines, Dec Medical Adjuncts in IVF: Evidence for clinical practice, Mar 2009
18 Appendix B: Bibliography Appendix B lists the additional information taken into account in the analysis and considered by the Committee. Document name Description Location British Fertility Society: Policy and Practice Committee Guideline Development, 2009 Impact of obesity on female reproductive health: British Fertility Society, Policy and Practice Guidelines (Dec 2007) Medical Adjuncts in IVF: Evidence for clinical practice (Mar 2009) 2009 Process document Not publicly available. Clinical guideline (selected arbitrarily) Clinical guideline (selected arbitrarily) Not publicly available. Not publicly available.
19 Appendix C: Advisory Committee members, external advisers and NHS Evidence accreditation team NHS Evidence Advisory Committee Members The NHS Evidence Advisory Committee operates as a standing advisory committee of the Board of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The Committee provides advice to the Institute on a framework for accrediting sources of evidence that should be recognised as trusted sources of information for the NHS. The Chair of the Committee is appointed by the Institute s Board and the meetings are conducted by the Chair or in his/her absence the vice chair. The current Chair is David Haslam. A full list of the Advisory Committee membership is available on the NICE website 2. The members have been appointed for a period of 3 years. This may be extended by mutual agreement to a further term of 3 years and up to a maximum term of office of 10 years. The s of the Committee are arrived at by a consensus of those members present. The quorum is set at 50% of committee membership. The Committee submits its recommendations to the Institute s Guidance executive which acts under delegated powers of the Institute s Board in considering and approving its recommendations. Committee members are asked to declare any interests in the guidance producer to be accredited. If it is considered that there is a conflict of interest, the member(s) is excluded from participating further in the discussions. A list of the committee members who took part in the discussions for this accreditation appears below. 2
20 Title Name Surname Role Organisation Ms Judy Birch Lay member Ms Lynda Cox Head of Knowledge Sharing and Learning North East Strategic Health Authority Dr Brian Fisher General Practitioner NHS Alliance (GP and national patient/public lead) Professor David Haslam National Clinical Advisor Care Quality Commission Miss Ruth Liley Dr Donal O Donoghue Assistant director of Quality Improvement National Clinical Director for Kidney Care and Consultant Renal Physician Marie Curie Cancer Care Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust Professor Jon Nichol Dean School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield Dr Mahendra Patel Senior lecturer in pharmacy practice, school of applied sciences/consultant Pharmacist University of Huddersfield Mr Adrian Reyes- Hughes Associate Clinical Director NHS Direct Dr Karen Ritchie Ms Ann Slee Dr Mark Strong Ms Gill Swash Lead Health Services Researcher Director of Pharmacy and Medicines Management MRC Fellow, Section of Public Health Head of knowledge and Library Services NHS Quality Improvement Scotland University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) University of Sheffield NHS Western Cheshire
21 Dr Sara Twaddle Director Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network External Advisers for British Fertility Society accreditation application Cheryl Harding-Trestrail, Locality Commissioning Manager (West), NHS Southampton City, Southampton, UK Mik Horswell, Consultant, Healthcare Information Management HealthSystems Consultants Limited, Wisley, Surrey, UK Victoria Wilkinson, Network Manager, Primary Care Research Network - North West (PCRN-NW), Widnes, Cheshire, UK NHS Evidence accreditation team for British Fertility Society accreditation application John Huston, Accreditation Technical Analyst, NHS Evidence, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester, UK Dr Paul Chrisp, Associate Director Accreditation, NHS Evidence, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester, UK
Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Referral guidelines. Final Accreditation Report. Guidance producer: Guidance product: Date: 29 June 2010
Guidance producer: Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Guidance product: Referral guidelines Date: 29 June 2010 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation... 3 Implementation...
More informationRoyal College of Physicians (RCP) National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. Final Accreditation Report. Guidance producer: Guidance product:
Guidance producer: Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Guidance product: National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Date: 29 June 2010 Final Accreditation Report Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Implementation...
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: Uveal Melanoma Guideline Development Group Guidance product: Uveal Melanoma National Guidelines Date: 24 November 2014 Version: 1.3 Final Accreditation Report Uveal Melanoma Guideline
More informationDraft Accreditation Report for consultation
Guidance producer: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Care Considerations Working Group Guidance product: Diagnosis and Management of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy guideline Date: 24 June 2011 Draft Accreditation
More informationFinal Accreditation Report
Guidance producer: British HIV Association (BHIVA) Guidance product: UK national guidelines Date: 2 nd August 2012 Version: 1.4 Final Accreditation Report Page 1 of 27 Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation
More informationCase scenarios: Patient Group Directions
Putting NICE guidance into practice Case scenarios: Patient Group Directions Implementing the NICE guidance on Patient Group Directions (MPG2) Published: March 2014 [updated March 2017] These case scenarios
More informationCosting report: Lipid modification Implementing the NICE guideline on lipid modification (CG181)
Putting NICE guidance into practice Costing report: Lipid modification Implementing the NICE guideline on lipid modification (CG181) Published: July 2014 This costing report accompanies Lipid modification:
More informationPRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE 18 March 2016
Part 1 Part 2 PRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE 18 March 2016 Title of Report Supporting deaf patients to access primary care services Purpose of the Report The report is to provide the co-commissioning
More informationProstate Cancer Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL June 2009
Prostate Cancer Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL June 2009 Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Prostate Cancer Priority Setting Partnership
More informationMS Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL August 2012
MS Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL August 2012 Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the MS Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) and the basic roles
More informationPowys teaching Health Board. Local Healthcare Professionals Forum. Terms of Reference - DRAFT
1. Purpose Powys teaching Health Board Local Healthcare Professionals Forum Terms of Reference - DRAFT As an Advisory Group of Powys teaching Health Board the Forum is accountable to the Health Board and
More informationVolunteering in NHSScotland Developing and Sustaining Volunteering in NHSScotland
NG11-07 ing in NHSScotland Developing and Sustaining ing in NHSScotland Outcomes The National Group for ing in NHS Scotland agreed the outcomes below which formed the basis of the programme to develop
More informationEPF s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the "Summary of Clinical Trial Results for Laypersons"
EPF s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the "Summary of Clinical Trial Results for Laypersons" August 2016 This document received funding under an operating grant from the European
More informationDementia Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL March 2012
Dementia Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL March 2012 Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Dementia Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) and
More informationA critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument
A critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument Created with the AGREE II Online Guideline Appraisal Tool. No endorsement of the content of this document by the
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476
Paclitaxel as albumin-bound nanoparticles with gemcitabine for untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 6 September 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta476 NICE 2018. All
More informationSmoking cessation interventions and services
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guideline version (Final) Smoking cessation interventions and services [E] Evidence reviews for advice NICE guideline NG92 Evidence reviews FINAL These
More informationPatient Group Directions Policy
Patient Group Directions Policy Category: Summary: Equality Analysis undertaken: Valid From: Date of Next Review: Approval Date/ Via: Distribution: Related Documents: Author(s): Further Information: This
More informationTHE RESPONSIBLE PHARMACIST REGULATIONS
THE RESPONSIBLE PHARMACIST REGULATIONS A SUMMARY OF THE RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON PROPOSALS FOR THE CONTENT OF THE REGULATIONS DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy HR / Workforce Management Planning
More information1. Purpose of the Pessary PSP and background
Pessary Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL May 2016 1. Purpose of the Pessary PSP and background The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Pessary Priority
More informationUSE OF UNLICENSED MEDICINES AND OFF-LABEL MEDICINES WHERE A LICENSED MEDICINE IS AVAILABLE
NHS Scotland Directors of Pharmacy and Scottish Association of Medical Directors USE OF UNLICENSED MEDICINES AND OFF-LABEL MEDICINES WHERE A LICENSED MEDICINE IS AVAILABLE CONSENSUS STATEMENT This consensus
More informationTrust Leads Board Terms of Reference
Manchester Cancer Trust Leads Board Terms of Reference These terms of reference were agreed on 28 th July 2014 by the Manchester Cancer Trust Leads Board. The terms of reference will be subject to future
More informationGOVERNING BOARD. Assisted Conception (IVF): Review of access criteria. Date of Meeting 21 January 2015 Agenda Item No 13. Title
GOVERNING BOARD Date of Meeting 21 January 2015 Agenda Item No 13 Title Assisted Conception (IVF): Review of access criteria Purpose of Paper The SHIP (Southampton, Hampshire, Isle of Wight and Portsmouth)
More informationCANCER IN SCOTLAND: ACTION FOR CHANGE The structure, functions and working relationships of Regional Cancer Advisory Groups
CANCER IN SCOTLAND: ACTION FOR CHANGE The structure, functions and working relationships of Regional Cancer Advisory Groups Introduction/Background 1. Our National Health: A Plan for action, a plan for
More informationWe are currently recruiting new members to advisory groups for the following research programmes:
Information for applicants to join NIHR as an advisory group member: HTA Programme Topic Identification, Development and Evaluation (TIDE) panel Chairs 1. Background information The goal of the National
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE. Dementia: the management of dementia, including the use of antipsychotic medication in older people
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE 1 Guideline title SCOPE Dementia: the management of dementia, including the use of antipsychotic medication in older people 1.1 Short title Dementia 2 Background
More informationAPPENDIX 2. Appendix 2 MoU
APPENDIX 2 THIS APPENDIX CONTAINS BOTH THE TEXT OF THE CURRENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN JCSTD, THE GDC AND COPDEND ABOUT THEIR JOINT WORKING ARRANGEMENTS AND THE WORKING NOTES DRAFTED BY PROF
More informationThe RPS is the professional body for pharmacists in Wales and across Great Britain. We are the only body that represents all sectors of pharmacy.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society 2 Ash Tree Court Woodsy Close Cardiff Gate Business Park Pontprennau Cardiff CF23 8RW Mr Mark Drakeford AM, Chair, Health and Social Care Committee National Assembly for Wales
More informationTITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines
TITLE: Delivery of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Non-Hospital Settings: A Review of the Safety and Guidelines DATE: 08 May 2014 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a treatment that
More informationAlcohol interventions in secondary and further education
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guideline version (Draft for Consultation) Alcohol interventions in secondary and further education NICE guideline: methods NICE guideline Methods
More information2.2 The primary roles and responsibilities of the Committee are to:
Edinburgh Child Protection Constitution 1. Introduction 1.1 This document sets out the governance arrangements established to promote the delivery of integrated, high quality child protection services
More informationAccess to newly licensed medicines. Scottish Medicines Consortium
Access to newly licensed medicines Scottish Medicines Consortium Modifiers The Committee has previously been provided with information about why the SMC uses modifiers in its appraisal process and also
More informationThe next steps
Greater Manchester Hepatitis C Strategy The next steps 2010-2013 Endorsed by GM Director of Public Health group January 2011 Hepatitis Greater Manchester Hepatitis C Strategy 1. Introduction The Greater
More informationPolicy and Procedure for the Development, Approval and Implementation of Patient Group Directions in NHS Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group
BEFORE USING THIS POLICY ALWAYS ENSURE YOU ARE USING THE MOST UP TO DATE VERSION Policy and Procedure for the Development, Approval and Implementation of Patient Group Directions in NHS Haringey Clinical
More informationHealth Scrutiny Panel 6 February 2014
Agenda Item No: 5 Health Scrutiny Panel 6 February 2014 Report title Infertility Policy Review Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group Cabinet member with lead responsibility Wards affected Accountable
More informationEHR Developer Code of Conduct Frequently Asked Questions
EHR Developer Code of Conduct Frequently Asked Questions General What is the purpose of the EHR Developer Code of Conduct? EHR Association (the Association) members have a long tradition of working with
More information1. Purpose of the PSP and background. 2. Aims and objectives of the Psoriasis PSP
Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL [14/07/] 1. Purpose of the PSP and background This protocol sets out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Psoriasis Priority Setting Partnership (PSP)
More informationCommunity alcohol detoxification in primary care
Community alcohol detoxification in primary care 1. Purpose The purpose of this primary care enhanced service is to improve the health and quality of life of people whose health may be compromised by their
More informationClinical Governance Advice No. 1d
Clinical Governance Advice No. 1d February 2010 DEVELOPMENT OF RCOG GREEN-TOP GUIDELINES: CONSENSUS METHODS FOR ADAPTATION OF GREEN-TOP GUIDELINES This is the second edition of Clinical Governance Advice
More informationThis paper outlines the engagement activity that took place, and provides key themes from the 57 written responses received.
Agenda item: 5.4 Subject: Presented by: Prepared by: Submitted to: Specialist Fertility Services Dr Dustyn Saint SNCCG Commissioning Team SNCCG Communications and Engagement Team SNCCG Governing Body Date:
More informationHealth care guidelines, recommendations, care pathways
II European Reference Network Conference From planning to implementation Lisbon, 8-9 October 2015 Health care guidelines, recommendations, care pathways Paola Laricchiuta National Centre for Rare Diseases
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta499
Glecaprevir pibrentasvir for treating chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 24 January 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta499 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights
More informationDESIGNED TO TACKLE RENAL DISEASE IN WALES DRAFT 2 nd STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK for
DESIGNED TO TACKLE RENAL DISEASE IN WALES DRAFT 2 nd STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK for 2008-11 1. Aims, Outcomes and Outputs The National Service Framework Designed to Tackle Renal Disease in Wales sets standards
More informationAdding Value to the NHS, Health and Care, through Research Management, Support & Leadership
Invitation to Comment This new draft strategy has been developed to ensure that the Forum continues to thrive, that we meet the needs of the community over the next five years, and that by acting together
More informationNorth of England Cancer Network. Policies and Procedures. Standards for the Safe Use of Oral Anticancer Medicines
\ North of England Cancer Network Policies and Procedures Standards for the Safe Use of Oral Anticancer Medicines NECN Oral Anticancer medicine Policy version 1.6 Page 1 of 17 Issue Date: Feb 2017 Contents
More informationThe Constitution of the British Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME (BACME) CONTENTS. Name of the Organisation. 2. Aims and Objectives
The Constitution of the British Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME (BACME) October 2013 CONTENTS Name of the Organisation 1. History 2. Aims and Objectives 3. Membership of BACME 4. BACME executive
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 21 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta507
Sofosbuvir velpatasvir voxilaprevir for treating chronic hepatitis C Technology appraisal guidance Published: 21 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta507 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice
More informationFERTILITY SERVICE POLICY
FERTILITY SERVICE POLICY Page 1 of 8 FERTILITY SERVICE POLICY Please note that all Clinical Commissioning policies are currently under review and elements within the individual policies may have been replaced
More informationPatient and Public Involvement, Engagement and Participation Strategy NIHR Newcastle Clinical Research Facility
Patient and Public Involvement, Engagement and Participation Strategy 2017-2022 NIHR Newcastle Clinical Research Facility Context The NIHR Newcastle Clinical Research Facility (CRF) delivers high quality,
More informationKidney Transplantation
James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in Kidney Transplantation PROTOCOL Version 1.4 12 th June 2014 Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of
More informationAdvice Statement. Advice Statement November Advice for NHSScotland. Why is SHTG looking at this topic?
Advice Statement 014-18 November 2018 Advice Statement Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) for the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer in adults with signs or symptoms of colorectal cancer or at increased
More informationCultural Diversity and Community Advisory Committee Charter July
Cultural Diversity and Community Advisory Committee Charter July 2017-2018 Page 1 of 8 CONTENTS SECTION A: CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHARTER... 3 Statement of purpose... 3 1.
More informationCommittee of Senior Representatives Tenth Meeting Oslo, Norway 11 December 2006
Committee of Senior Representatives Tenth Meeting Oslo, Norway 11 December 2006 Reference CSR 10/7.1/1 Title Proposed Terms of Reference for the EG on HIV/AIDS Submitted by Secretariat Summary / Note As
More informationStudy protocol. Version 1 (06 April 2011) Ethics ref: R&D ref: UK CRC portfolio ID:
Identifying and prioritising important research questions for the treatment of eczema a collaborative partnership between patients, carers, clinicians and researchers Study protocol Version 1 (06 April
More informationMembership of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (update) guideline Committee
membership list Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (update) guideline Membership of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (update) guideline The will operate as an advisory to NICE s Board, developing a guideline on Post- The
More informationLow back pain and sciatica in over 16s NICE quality standard
March 2017 Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s NICE quality standard Draft for consultation This quality standard covers the assessment and management of non-specific low back pain and sciatica in young
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE. Type 2 diabetes: the management of type 2 diabetes (update)
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE 1 Guideline title SCOPE Type 2 diabetes: the management of type 2 diabetes (update) 1.1 Short title Type 2 diabetes (update) 2 Background a) The National
More informationConsultation Group: Dr Amalia Mayo, Paediatric Consultant. Review Date: March Uncontrolled when printed. Version 2. Executive Sign-Off
Policy For The Adjustment Of Insulin Injections By Paediatric Diabetes Specialist Nurses/Community Paediatric Nurses Diabetes Working With Children Within NHS Grampian Co-ordinators: Lead Paediatric Diabetes
More informationName Title Interests Declared Gifts and Hospitality Dr Andrew Parson
REGISTER OF INTERESTS - BROMLEY CCG GOVERNING BODY JANUARY 2018 ENCLOSURE 1 MEMBERS (STATUTORY) Name Title Interests Declared Gifts and Hospitality Dr Andrew Parson Clinical Chair Chislehurst Medical Practice
More informationSurveillance report Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk
Surveillance report 2018 Type 2 diabetes prevention: ention: population and community-level el interventions entions (2011) NICE guideline PH35 and Type 2 diabetes: prevention ention in people at high
More informationCONSTITUTION SOUTHAMPTON CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE S TRUST PARTNERSHIP
CONSTITUTION SOUTHAMPTON CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE S TRUST PARTNERSHIP 1. AIMS To unify and co-ordinate services for children, young people and families in line with the Children Act 2004 To oversee the
More informationPatient Group Directions (PGDs)
Patient Group Directions (PGDs) Document level: Trustwide (TW) Code: MP2 Issue number: 4 Lead executive Authors details Type of document Target audience Document purpose Medical Director Senior Clinical
More informationThey are updated regularly as new NICE guidance is published. To view the latest version of this NICE Pathway see:
Strategy,, policy and commissioning on hepatitis B and C testing NICE Pathways bring together everything NICE says on a topic in an interactive flowchart. NICE Pathways are interactive and designed to
More informationCultural Diversity and Community Advisory Committee Charter
Cultural Diversity and Community Advisory Committee Charter July 2015-2016 CONTENTS SECTION A: CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHARTER... 3 Statement of purpose... 3 1. Background and
More informationCommunity Advisory Council Terms of Reference
Community Advisory Council Terms of Reference The role of the Community Advisory Councils (CACs) is to provide the Board of the Sunshine Coast Health Network Ltd (SCHN) trading as Central Queensland, Wide
More informationMedical technologies guidance Published: 1 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg35
Memokath-051 stent for ureteric obstruction Medical technologies guidance Published: 1 February 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg35 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationNo Smoking Policy. No Smoking Policy
No Smoking Policy Document Status Version: V4.0 Approved DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Initiated by Date Author HR Version Date Comments (i.e. viewed, or reviewed, amended approved by person or committee) V1.1
More informationClinical guideline Published: 23 May 2012 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg140
Palliative care for adults: strong opioids for pain relief Clinical guideline Published: 23 May 12 nice.org.uk/guidance/cg140 NICE 18. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationTechnology appraisal guidance Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta516
Cabozantinib for treating medullary thyroid cancer Technology appraisal guidance Published: 28 March 2018 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta516 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal Review of TA215; Pazopanib for the first line treatment of advanced
More informationPolypharmacy and Deprescribing. A special report on views from the PrescQIPP landscape review
Polypharmacy and Deprescribing A special report on views from the PrescQIPP landscape review Introduction and background In recent years, we have seen the emergence of an international discussion around
More informationWhat makes a good clinical guideline? Published by Hayward Medical Communications
Volume 1, number 11 What makes a good clinical guideline? Published by Hayward Medical Communications Rebecca Broughton RGN Evidence Based Practice Coordinator, Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust Barrie
More informationLEAF Marque Assurance Programme
Invisible ISEAL Code It is important that the integrity of the LEAF Marque Standard is upheld therefore the LEAF Marque Standards System has an Assurance Programme to ensure this. This document outlines
More informationThe National Council for Palliative Care Awards 2017 Judges Profiles
The National Council for Palliative Care Awards 2017 Judges Profiles Alison Penny Coordinator, Childhood Bereavement Network Alison coordinates the Childhood Bereavement Network (CBN) and provides project
More informationEmergency Medicine Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL (Version 1: )
Emergency Medicine Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL (Version 1: 22.10.2015) Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Emergency Medicine Priority
More informationGuidance on colleague and patient questionnaires
Guidance on colleague and patient questionnaires 2 Revalidation is the process by which doctors must demonstrate to the General Medical Council (GMC), normally every five years, that they are up to date
More informationDAFNE Sponsorship Opportunities
DAFNE Sponsorship Opportunities 2016-2017 Background to the DAFNE programme DAFNE (Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating) is an evidenced skills-based structured education programme in intensive insulin therapy
More informationThe Cochrane Collaboration
The Cochrane Collaboration Version and date: V1, 29 October 2012 Guideline notes for consumer referees You have been invited to provide consumer comments on a Cochrane Review or Cochrane Protocol. This
More informationActivity Report March 2013 February 2014
West of Scotland Cancer Network Skin Cancer Managed Clinical Network Activity Report March 2013 February 2014 Dr Girish Gupta Consultant Dermatologist MCN Clinical Lead Tom Kane MCN Manager West of Scotland
More informationWhich? response to the NHS dental services in England Independent Review by Professor Jimmy Steele
Which? response to the NHS dental services in England Independent Review by Professor Jimmy Steele DATE: 14 July 2009 TO: Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP Secretary of State for Health Department of Health Richmond
More informationA proposal for collaboration between the Psychometrics Committee and the Association of Test Publishers of South Africa
A proposal for collaboration between the Psychometrics Committee and the Association of Test Publishers of South Africa 27 October 2015 Table of contents Introduction... 3 Overview of the Association of
More informationGP Experiences: Mental health information on Lambeth GP websites
GP Experiences: Mental health information on Lambeth GP websites February 2017 Contents Introduction... 2 Methods... 2 Limitations... 2 Findings... 3 a. Can I find information easily?... 3 b. Is there
More information2010 National Audit of Dementia (Care in General Hospitals) North West London Hospitals NHS Trust
Royal College of Psychiatrists 2010 National Audit of Dementia (Care in General Hospitals) Organisational checklist results and commentary for: rth West London Hospitals NHS Trust The 2010 national audit
More informationWest Hampshire Clinical Commissioning Group Board
West Hampshire Clinical Commissioning Group Board Date of meeting 25 July 2013 Agenda Item 9 Paper No WHCCG13/089 Priorities Committee Statement Assisted Conception/IVF Key issues An Interim Policy Statement
More informationOsteoporosis: fragility fracture risk. Costing report. Implementing NICE guidance
Osteoporosis: fragility fracture risk Costing report Implementing NICE guidance August 2012 NICE clinical guideline 146 1 of 15 This costing report accompanies the clinical guideline: Osteoporosis: assessing
More informationIAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item. DRAFT EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ISA 701 and ISA 702 Exposure Drafts February 2005
IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page 2005 579 Agenda Item 13-F DRAFT EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ISA 701 and ISA 702 Exposure Drafts February 2005 Introduction This memorandum provides some background to, and
More informationROLE SPECIFICATION FOR MACMILLAN GPs
ROLE SPECIFICATION FOR MACMILLAN GPs November 2010 History of Macmillan GPs Macmillan Cancer Support has funded GP positions from the early 1990 s, following the success of our investment in supporting
More informationEvaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report. Prostate Cancer UK
Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report Prostate Cancer UK July 2014 Contents Executive summary... 2 Summary of the research... 2 Main findings... 2 Lessons learned...
More informationPRESCRIBING BY RADIOGRAPHERS: A VISION PAPER
PRESCRIBING BY RADIOGRAPHERS: A VISION PAPER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Review of Prescribing, Supply & Administration of Medicines (Crown II) Final Report was submitted to The Secretary of State for Health
More informationPutting feet first: national minimum skills framework
In partnership with Putting feet first: national minimum skills framework The national minimum skills framework for commissioning of footcare services for people with diabetes Revised March 2011 This report
More informationPolicy Statement. Title/Topic: Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Osteoarthritis Date: April 2014 Reference: GM037
Policy Statement Title/Topic: Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Osteoarthritis Date: April 2014 Reference: GM037 VERSION CONTROL Version Date Details Page number 0.1 09/09/2013 Initial draft N/A 0.2 19/09/2013
More informationDarwin Marine Supply Base HSEQ Quality Management Plan
Darwin Marine Supply Base HSEQ Quality Management Plan REVISION SUMMARY Revision Date Comment Authorised 0 29.9.13 Initial input JC 1 12.1.15 General Review JC 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Revision Log Revision No
More informationNational Cancer Peer Review Programme
National Cancer Peer Review Programme Julia Hill Acting Deputy National Co-ordinator What is Cancer Peer Review? A quality assurance process for cancer services. An integral part of Improving Outcomes
More informationCosting Report: atrial fibrillation Implementing the NICE guideline on atrial fibrillation (CG180)
Putting NICE guidance into practice Costing Report: atrial fibrillation Implementing the NICE guideline on atrial fibrillation (CG180) Published: June 2014 This costing report accompanies the clinical
More informationMembership of Public Health Advisory Committee C / Drug misuse prevention
Committee membership list Public Health Advisory Committee C / Drug misuse prevention Membership of Public Health Advisory Committee C / Drug misuse prevention The Committee will operate as an advisory
More informationNHSScotland is required to consider the Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) advice.
Advice Statement 010-18 July 2018 Advice Statement What is the most accurate and cost-effective direct test (ELF test, hyaluronic acid, P3NP, Fibroscan or ARFI elastography) for detecting and staging liver
More informationFrom the Deputy Chief Medical Officer / Chief Dental Officer Dr Anne Kilgallen / Simon Reid. Circular HSC (SQSD) (NICE NG30) 37/16
From the Deputy Chief Medical Officer / Chief Dental Officer Dr Anne Kilgallen / Simon Reid Circular HSC (SQSD) (NICE NG30) 37/16 Subject: NICE Public Health Guideline NG30 - Oral health promotion: general
More informationActivity Report July 2012 June 2013
Urological Cancers Managed Clinical Network Activity Report July 2012 June 2013 Mr Seamus Teahan Consultant Urologist MCN Clinical Lead Tom Kane MCN Manager 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationBritish Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020
British Association of Stroke Physicians Strategy 2017 to 2020 1 P age Contents Introduction 3 1. Developing and influencing local and national policy for stroke 5 2. Providing expert advice on all aspects
More informationINTERNAL VALIDATION REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM)
INTERNAL VALIDATION REPORT (MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAM) Network Trust MDT NECN N Tees & Hartlepool North Tees And Hartlepool Date Self Assessment Completed 23rd July 2009 Date of IV Review 19th June 2009
More information