The old IVF patient: An evidence based approach. Stratis Kolibianakis MD MSc PhD

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "The old IVF patient: An evidence based approach. Stratis Kolibianakis MD MSc PhD"

Prosper Robbins
6 years ago
Views:

1 The old IVF patient: An evidence based approach Stratis Kolibianakis MD MSc PhD Unit for Human Reproduction 1 st Dept Ob/Gyn Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

2 No conflict of interest

3 How old is old?

4 How old is old? Great inconsistency in the literature regarding the definition of older mothers Klitzman 2016 >35 y, >38 y, >40 y The definition can vary depending on the decade of publication A 35-year-old woman in the 1980s is described as an older mother Robinson et al 1987 In 2007, women of the same age are considered to be part of the younger cohort McMahon et al 2007

5 No universal definition of the old IVF patient

6 How frequently do we encounter old IVF patients?

7 European data EIM 2016 (2011) Aspirations % Age IVF ICSI Kupka et al 2016

8 SART 2014 Age group < > 42 Cycles %

9 Approximately 1/5 of all IVF cycles are performed in patients > 40 years of age

10 The old IVF patient: An evolving problem Proportion of IVF / ICSI cycles performed in women >40 years of age in Europe ( ) IVF ICSI

11 The old IVF patient: An evolving problem Proportion of egg donation cycles performed in women >40 years of age Europe ( ) ED ED

12 Explanations for the increasing proportion of old IVF patients Low awareness of the rapid decrease in fertility with age in reproductive-aged men and women Bretherick et al 2010 Overestimation of the age that women's fertility decreases, and of the odds of success of IVF treatments Peterson et al 2012 Improvement in pregnancy rates leads to a shift towards more older patients in IVF programs Gleicher et al 2006

13 What is the probability of live birth in the old IVF patient?

14 European data EIM 2016 (2011) Deliveries Age IVF ICSI Kupka et al 2016

15 SART 2014 Live birth Age group < > 42 Cycles 40,805 21,137 20,274 10, Live birth % %CI All transfers performed with embryos fresh or frozen originating from a single oocyte retrieval

16 Outcome of 1114 ICSI and embryo transfer cycles of women > 40 years of age Significant decrease in delivery rates per transfer per year No PGS, no blastocyst culture Ciray et al 2006

17 Klipstein et al ,705 IVF cycles in 1,263 women age > 40 years Live birth p<0.001 Age Cycles Live birth /cycle started Tsafrir et al ,217 IVF/ICSI in 381women > 40 years FSH <20 IU/L Live birth p< Age Cycles Delivery /cycle started

18 Serour et al ,386 IVF/ICSI cycles in 1,645 women > 40 years FSH<20 IU/L AMH >0.6 ng/ml Live birth p<0.001 Age >45 Cycles Live birth /cycle started

19 The probability of live birth in women >40 years of age is small and decreases significantly with each additional year

20 What is the probability of cumulative live birth in the old IVF patient?

21 Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI 116 pts 26 pts 236 cycles 66 cycles FSH<15 IU/L Osmanagaoglu et al 2002

22 Cumulative live birth rates after IVF in 66 women aged AFC >5, basal FSH <15 IU/l, regular cycles If during the first IVF/ICSI cycle 3 oocytes were retrieved, a second cycle was not initiated 125 cycles Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Patients at risk Live births Cumulative Live birth %CI van Disseldorp et al 2007

23 Cumulative pregnancy rates in 1,217 IVF treatment cycles in 318 women > 40 years All patients, FSH < 20 IU/L Tsafrir et al 2007

24 The cumulative probability of pregnancy in women >40 years of age is small (5.7% after 3 cycles)

25 What is the probability of live birth in IVF patients >45 years?

26 Delivery rates in women > 45 years (288 cycles) Only patients with a reasonable chance of achieving a pregnancy were included 19.8%: cancelled due to elevated FSH or ovarian cyst 30.0%: cancelled due to low or no response (<3 follicles) Age Cycles with OPU COCs 2pn Embryos transferred 2.9 Delivery Up to seven embryos were replaced when available Spandorfer et al 2007

27 The old IVF patient Costs implications

28 Cost per live birth from IVF increases with maternal age and order of attempts Griffiths et a 2010 Incremental cost per live birth by maternal age and treatment cycle

29 The cost for treating old IVF patients need to be considered in counseling these patients

30 How many embryos to transfer in the old IVF patient?

31 How many embryos to transfer in the old IVF patient? Age Embryos transferred Live birth An increase in the number of embryos transferred is associated with an increase in the probability of live birth rate (p < 0.001), even after adjusting for age at cycle start Klipstein et al 2006

32 Number of embryos transferred and probability of multiple pregnancy in the old IVF patient Klipstein et al ,705 IVF cycles in 1,263 women > 40 years Live birth p<0.001 Age Twins Triplets Klipstein et al 2006

33 The more embryos transferred the higher the probability of live birth in patients > 40 years of age, however, twins and triplets are still possible

34 The old IVF patient Can we identify predictive factors for the achievement of live birth?

35 Prognostic factors for live birth in the old IVF patient (>40 years) Serum AMH tertiles ng/ml Low <0.48 Middle High >1.23 Cycles Age COCs Embryos obtained Embryos transferred Viable pregnancy/cycle p<0.05 Lee et al 2011

36 Prognostic factors for live birth in the old IVF patient Cut-off AMH level ng/ml ROC AUC p Cycle cancellation Non-pregnancy Lee et al 2011

37 Prognostic factors for live birth in the old IVF patient Live birth Age (years) Overall Cryopreservation No cryopreservation Significantly higher live birth rates in patients with cryopreservation, after adjusting for age at cycle start and number of embryos transferred (p <0.02) Klipstein et al 2006

38 The availability of embryos for cryopreservation after a fresh transfer is associated with a significantly higher probability of live birth in patients > 40 years of age AMH can be used to predict cycle cancellation and non pregnancy in patients > 40 years of age

39 The old IVF patient A viscous cycle Decrease in oocytes number Increase in aneuploidy rates

40 Declining follicle number with advancing age Faddy et al 1992

41 Decreased euploidy rates with increasing maternal age 46,439 embryo biopsies from 6,365 IVF cycles 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism Demko et al 2016

42 Miscarriage rates in women > 40 years of age Age Cycles Spontaneous abortion % Overall loss % n/a n/a All > Klipstein et al 2006

43 Can PGS be used to manage the old IVF patient?

38.8 vs. 38.0 40.5 vs. 40.6 38.0 vs.. 37.

44 PGS for aneuploidies Advanced maternal age Live birth rate per woman randomised 38.8 vs vs vs vs vs Twisk et al 2011

45 The effect of preimplantation genetic screening on implantation rate in 150 women over 35 years of age FISH Moayeri, et al 2016

46 PGS by FISH is associated with a significantly lower probability of live birth in patients with advanced maternal age

47 Interventions to increase ovarian response Directly or indirectly increase FSH levels Increase in the sensitivity of the developing follicles to FSH

48 Interventions to increase ovarian response Directly or indirectly increase FSH levels Increased doses of FSH, FSH initiation in the luteal phase, long acting FSH, letrozole, short GnRH agonist protocol, GnRH antagonist protocol or different types of FSH

49 Increase in FSH dose Study Age years Comparison COCs Cedrin-Durnerin 2000 n=96 - Decremental dose IU vs. high FSH fixed dose 450 IU 6.4 vs. 6.3 Klinkert 2005 n= vs IU vs. 300 IU 3 vs. 3 no significant differences Berkkanoglu 2010 n= vs vs IU vs. 450 IU vs. 600 IU 5.2 vs. 6.3 vs. 6.6 Lefebvre 2015 n= vs IU vs 600 IU 5 vs vs. 3 (MIIs)

50 Long acting FSH vs. daily FSH 79 poor responders COCs 40.5 years Long acting FSH 3.0 vs. daily FSH years p=0.26 Kolibianakis et al 2015

51 Long acting FSH vs. daily FSH Kolibianakis et al 2015

52 Initiation of FSH during the luteal phase Study Age years comparison COCs luteal vs follicular Rombauts et al 1998 n= vs Initiation of FSH 150 IU during the luteal phase vs after the onset of menses 5 vs. 5.5 Kansal Kalra et al 2008 n= vs IU subcutaneously twice a day, 9 days after spontaneous LH surge On day 1 of menses, the dose was increased to 300 IU twice a day Patients in the follicular arm began rfsh at the maximum dose (300 IU twice a day) 2.5 vs 3.0

53 Antagonists-letrozole vs micro dose flare up High dose FSH IU

54 AL vs. MF COCs % Study Year SMD (95% CI) Weight 33.5 vs Davar (-1.01, -0.18) vs Mohsen (-0.49, 0.52) Overall (-0.90, 0.29) favours Letrozole

55 GnRH agonists vs. GnRH antagonists Griesinger et al 2006 Xiao et al 2011 Pu et al 2013

56 GnRH agonists vs. GnRH antagonists COCs 36.6 vs vs vs vs vs vs vs vs Kolibianakis et al unpublished

Short versus long protocol COCs Age: 39.2 vs. 38.

57 Short versus long protocol COCs Age: 39.2 vs Age: 36.9 vs WMD %CI: to +1.02

58 GnRH antagonists versus no pituitary suppression Akman et al patients GnRH antagonists/fsh+hmg vs. FSH+HMG Age: 37.3 Age: 38.2 COCs 3.25 vs p=ns

59 Interventions to increase ovarian response Increase in the sensitivity of the developing follicles to FSH Androgens/androgen-modulating agents (Testosterone, DHEA, aromatase inhibitors, rec LH,rec hcg) By influencing the somatotropic axis (GH, pyridostigmine, oral L-arginine)

60 Interventions to increase ovarian response Increase in the sensitivity of the developing follicles to FSH Androgens/androgen-modulating agents (Testosterone, DHEA, aromatase inhibitors, rec LH,rec hcg) by influencing the somatotropic axis (GH, pyridostigmine, oral L-arginine)

61 Addition of testosterone 37.3 vs vs vs vs WMD: COCs 95%CI: to Bosdou et al ESHRE 2016

62 DHEA DHEA pretreatment COCs % Study Year COCs WMD (95% CI) Weight 36.5 vs Artini (-1.23, 3.05) vs Moawad (1.29, 3.51) vs Yeung (-2.44, 3.44) vs Ktob (0.09, 2.11) Overall 1.54 (0.86, 2.23) WMD: %CI: to WMD: % CI: to Kolibianakis et Kolibianakis al unpublishedet al ESHRE 2016 Favours DHEA 329 patients

63 Aromatase inhibitors COCs 37.9 vs vs WMD: % CI: to Kolibianakis et al unpublished

rlh addition COCs 31.7 vs. 31.5 30.4 vs. 31.5 <37 y 36.3 vs. 33.0 41.

64 rlh addition COCs 31.7 vs vs <37 y 36.3 vs vs vs WMD %CI: to Lehert et al 2014

65 hcg addition 48 women received 600 IU of rec FSH + 75 IU of rec hcg, 51 women received only 600 IU of rec FSH hcg, age: 35.2 years vs. no hcg, age: 34.9 years MIIs 3.8 vs. 5.6 p=0.19 Berkanoglu 2007

66 Interventions to increase ovarian response Increase in the sensitivity of the developing follicles to FSH using androgens/androgen-modulating agents (Testosterone, DHEA, aromatase inhibitors, rec LH,rec hcg) By influencing the somatotropic axis (GH, pyridostigmine, oral L-arginine)

67 Addition of growth hormone COCs % Study Year WMD (95% CI) Weight Bergh (-5.51, 0.51) vs Dor (-4.95, -1.27) vs Kuzuk (2.34, 4.14) vs Eftechar (0.14, 2.46) Overall (-2.91, 2.75) Bosch et al 2016

68 Addition of Pyridostigmine Kim et al, 70 patients Addition of pyridostigmine versus no addition COCs Pyridostigmine: 5.9 vs. no pyridostigmin: 3.7 Age: 36.7 Age: 38.2 WMD % CI: to Kim et al. 1999

69 Addition of L-arginine Addition of L-arginine versus placebo 34 women, mean age: 40.2 COCs: L-arginine: 4.1 vs. Placebo:1.6 WMD = % CI: to Battaglia et al.,1999

70 Can ovarian response be improved in patients with low ovarian reserve? Various interventions Addition of aspirin

71 Addition of aspirin Lok et al., patients GnRH-agonists/HMG Age: 36.0 Aspirin versus placebo Age: 36.9 COCs 3.0 vs. 4.0 WMD: %CI: -2.0 to +1.6

72 Interventions to increase ovarian response Intervention Control COCs Studies Patients Addition of pyridostigmine no addition Addition of L-arginine no addition Long agonist Short agonist DHEA No DHEA Testosterone pretreatment no testosterone GnRH agonists GnRH antagonists Addition of reclh to FSH no addition

73 There is evidence from RCTs to suggest that certain interventions are associated with a small increase in ovarian response, the clinical significance of which, however, is debatable..

74 Various interventions in the old IVF patient

75 Laser-Assisted Hatching in women of advance age Live birth 39.0 vs vs vs 40.0 Favours AH Martins 2011

76 Laser-Assisted Hatching Age Shi et al 2016

77 Assisted hatching does not increase the probability of live birth in women with advanced maternal age

78 The old IVF patient Oocyte donation

79 Oocyte donation at advanced maternal age Success rates decline in older recipients Age Live birth % SART data: Yeh et al 2014

80 Oocyte donation at advanced maternal age Live birth rate Age Cycles Adjusted OR 95% CI p ref < <0.001 SART data: Yeh et al 2014

81 Does the probability of pregnancy decrease with maternal age after oocyte donation? Live birth rate Age Cycles Adjusted OR 95% CI P ref < <0.06 SART data: Yeh et al 2014

82 The probability of live birth after oocyte donation is high in old IVF recipients but decreases with increasing maternal age

83 Obstetric risks in the old IVF patient

84 Obstetric outcomes in women less or more than 35 years of age (6619 women with singleton pregnancies) Wang et al 2011

85 Obstetric outcomes in women less or more than 40 years of age (16,427 women) Chan et al 2008

86 Pre-eclampsia in 330 women >40 years of age using their own oocytes after IVF or natural conception 41,5 y 32.5y 41,2 y 32.1y Toshimitsu et al 2014

87 Obstetric outcomes in donor oocyte pregnancies 380 women >43 years of age Risk of preeclampsia Adjusted OR 95% CI Incidence No IVF IVF without oocyte donation IVF with oocyte donation Le Ray et al 2012

88 Obstetric outcomes in 71 donor oocyte pregnancies compared with 108 advanced maternal age in in-vitro fertilization pregnancies Krieg et al 2008

89 Obstetric risks are increased in women with advanced maternal age The risk of preeclampsia is increased after oocyte donation compared to natural conception in women with advanced maternal age The risk of caesarean section and abnormal placentation are increased after oocyte donation compared to IVF using autologous oocytes in women with advanced maternal age

90 How old is old? Is there an age limit above which IVF/oocyte donation should not be offered?

91 How old is old? HFEA Australia No specification for an upper age limit for treatment. Clinics make their own determinations about patients Australia bars IVF after the average age of natural menopause, usually interpreted at 52 years of age ASRM No recommendation about upperage limits for women using their own eggs Guidelines: futility as interventions with less than a 1% likelihood of a live birth, very poor prognosis as odds of >1% but <5% 2004 Postmenopausal pregnancy should be discouraged, but physicians should carefully consider the specifics of each case 2013 Providers should implant embryos in women >50 years only after medical evaluation and should discourage women >55 years from doing so

92 Indian woman in her 70s gives birth to healthy baby boy on third attempt of oocyte donation

93 Conclusions No universal definition of the old IVF patient exits Approximately 1/5 of all IVF cycles are performed in patients > 40 years of age The probability of live birth women >40 years of age is small and decreases significantly with each additional year The cumulative probability of pregnancy in women >40 years of age is small (5.7% after 3 cycles)

94 Conclusions The increasing costs for treating old IVF patients need to be considered in counseling these patients The more embryos transferred the higher the probability of live birth in patients > 40 years of age, however, twins and triplets are still possible The availability of embryos for cryopreservation after a fresh transfer Is associated with a significantly higher probability of live birth in patients > 40 years of age

95 Conclusions AMH can be used to predict cycle cancellation and non-pregnancy in patients > 40 years of age PGS by FISH is associated with a significantly lower probability of live birth in patients with advanced maternal age There is evidence from RCTs to suggest that certain interventions are associated with a small increase in ovarian response, the clinical significance of which, however, is debatable

96 Conclusions The probability of live birth after oocyte donation Is high in old IVF recipients but decreases with increasing maternal age Obstetric risks are increased in women with advanced maternal age undergoing IVF

Zepiridis Unit for Human Reproduction 1 st Dept of OB/Gyn, Aristotle University of

97 Acknowledgements Chairman: Prof. B.C. Tarlatzis Clinical Academics Prof Dr. G. Grimbizis Prof Dr. G. Pados Prof Dr. H. Bili Prof Dr. L. Zepiridis Unit for Human Reproduction 1 st Dept of OB/Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki PhD fellows J Bosdou MD MSc Z Oikonomou N Tarlatzi Embryologists Prof K. Chatzimeletiou A. Mitsoli Head Nurse D Savvaidou

Poor & Hyper responders: what is the best approach?

Poor & Hyper responders: what is the best approach? A. La Marca ObGyn Dept University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Italy Center for Reproductive Medicine University Hospital of Modena Italy Criteria used