Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2"

Transcription

1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy ABSTRACT InteSwine consists of CFU/g of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is intended to be used as a feed additive for weaned piglets at a dose range of 6 x 10 9 to 4 x CFU/kg feed. Saccharomyces is considered by the EFSA to be suitable for the QPS approach to safety assessment. In the view of the FEEDAP Panel, the identity of the production strain is established as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and therefore safety for the target species, consumer and the environment can be presumed. The additive was shown not to be irritant to skin and eyes. As the product InteSwine does not contain particles smaller than 100 µm, it is not expected to present an inhalation hazard for workers. Three trials performed on weaned piglets showed that growth performance was significantly improved in each of the trials and feed conversion in two studies. Since the studies were made with different additive concentrations, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that InteSwine at the highest dose tested (4 x CFU/kg feed) has the potential to improve growth performance of weaned piglets. European Food Safety Authority, 2011 KEY WORDS Zootechnical additive, gut flora stabiliser, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, InteSwine, weaned piglets, efficacy, QPS 1 On request form the European Commission, Question No EFSA-Q , adopted on 11 May This scientific opinion has been edited following the provisions of Article 8(6) and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. The modified sections are indicated in the text. 3 Panel members: Gabriele Aquilina, Georges Bories, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Joop de Knecht, Noël Albert Dierick, Mikolaj Antoni Gralak, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Christer Hogstrand, Reinhard Kroker, Lubomir Leng, Secundino López Puente, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Giovanna Martelli, Miklós Mézes, Derek Renshaw, Maria Saarela, Kristen Sejrsen and Johannes Westendorf. Correspondence: FEEDAP@efsa.europa.eu 4 Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Micro-organisms, including Atte von Wright, Joaquim Brufau and Guido Rychen, for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion. Suggested citation: EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets. EFSA Journal 2011;9(5):2173. [10 pp.] doi: /j.efsa Available online: European Food Safety Authority, 2011

2 SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of the product InteSwine consisting of a minimum of CFU/g of viable cells of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The product is intended to be used as a feed additive for weaned piglets at a dose range of 6 x 10 9 to 4 x CFU/kg feed. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a species considered by the EFSA to be suitable for the QPS approach to safety assessment. In the view of the FEEDAP Panel, the identity of the production strain is established as S. cerevisiae and therefore safety for the target species, consumer and the environment can be presumed. The additive was shown not to be irritant to skin and eyes. As the product InteSwine does not contain particles smaller than 100 µm, it is not expected to present an inhalation hazard for workers. Three trials performed on weaned piglets showed that growth performance was significantly improved in each of the trials and feed conversion in two studies. Since the studies were made with different additive concentrations, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that InteSwine at the highest dose tested (4 x CFU/kg feed) has the potential to improve growth performance of weaned piglets. 2

3 TABLE OF CONTENTY Table of contents... 3 Background... 4 Terms of reference... 4 Assessment Introduction Characterisation Characterisation of the active agent Characterisation of the product Stability and homogeneity Conditions of use Evaluation of the analytical methods by the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL)7 3. Safety Efficacy Post-market monitoring... 8 Conclusions... 8 Documentation provided to EFSA... 9 References... 9 Appendix

4 BACKGROUND Regulation (EC) No 1831/ establishes the rules governing the European Union authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition. In particular, Article 4(1) of that Regulation lays down that any person seeking authorisation for a feed additive or for a new use of a feed additive shall submit an application in accordance with Article 7. The European Commission received a request from the company RM Associates Ltd 6 for authorisation of the product InteSwine, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, when used as a feed additive for weaned piglets (category: zootechnical additives; functional group: gut flora stabilisers) under the conditions mentioned in Table 1. According to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, the Commission forwarded the application to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) as an application under Article 4(1) (authorisation of a feed additive or new use of a feed additive). EFSA received directly from the applicant the technical dossier in support of this application. 7 According to Article 8 of that Regulation, EFSA, after verifying the particulars and documents submitted by the applicant, shall undertake an assessment in order to determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. The particulars and documents in support of the application were considered valid by EFSA as of 21 October The additive InteSwine is a microbiological feed additive containing cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625. This product has not been previously authorised in the European Union. TERMS OF REFERENCE According to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, EFSA shall determine whether the feed additive complies with the conditions laid down in Article 5. EFSA shall deliver an opinion on the safety for the target animal(s), consumer, user and the environment and the efficacy of the product InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), when used under the conditions described in Table OJ L 268, , p. 29. RM Associates Ltd on behalf of Integro Gida ve Ticaret AS; Gayrettepe, Istanbul, Turkey EFSA Dossier reference: FAD

5 Table 1: Description and conditions of use of the additive as proposed by the applicant Additive Registration number/ec No/No Categoryof additive Functional group(s) of additive Saccharomyces cerevisiae Zootechnical additives Gut flora stabiliser Description Chemical Purity criteria Method of analysis Composition, description formula Saccharomyces cerevisiae N/A N/A N/A Trade name Name of the holder of authorisation InteSwine Integro Gida SAN. Ve TIC. A.S Conditions of use Species or category of animal Maximum Age Minimum content Maximum content Withdrawal period CFU/kg of complete feedingstuffs piglets 35 kg 6 x x N/A Other provisions and additional requirements for the labelling Specific conditions or restrictions for use Specific conditions or restrictions for handling Post-market monitoring Specific conditions for use in complementary feedingstuffs None None None None Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) Species or category of Target tissue(s) or Maximum content in Marker residue animal food products tissues None None None None 5

6 ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction The microbial additive InteSwine is a preparation of viable cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The applicant has requested an authorisation under the category of zootechnical additives (functional group: gut flora stabilisers) for use in diets for weaned piglets. This product has not been previously authorised in the European Union. 2. Characterisation 2.1. Characterisation of the active agent The active agent of InteSwine is Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain NCYC R-625. The strain has been deposited at the UK National Collection of Yeast Culture with accession number R It has been identified based on morphological and phenotypic properties, and PFGE fingerprinting. It has not been subject to any genetic modification. The genetic stability of the strain (five samples) between January 2009 and December 2010 has been shown with PCR amplification of sigma sequences according to Fernandez-Espinar et al. (2001) Characterisation of the product 10 InteSwine is produced by batch fermentation in a growth medium based on molasses. After centrifugation the yeast cell mass is washed, concentrated and further dried until microgranules of yeast are obtained, with about 95 % dry weight. The minimum concentration of yeast in the final product is CFU/g. Batch to batch variation was measured in ten samples of five production batches of InteSwine. 11 The mean value was CFU/g with a CV of 18 %, indicating a low batch to batch variation. Action limits are set for microbial contaminants (mesophilic microbiota, coliforms, Escherichia coli, Staphyloccoccus aureus, Salmonella, Clostridium perfringens spores) and chemical impurities (Cd, Pb, As, Hg). 12 Analytical results from five batches confirm that observed levels are well below the action limits, and where applicable within the maximum concentrations set by Directive 2002/32/EC. Particle size distribution was measured by sieving. 13 Results indicate that the product InteSwine does not contain inhalable (<100 µm) and respirable (<10 µm) particles Stability and homogeneity Five batches of InteSwine were stored in their original packaging at an average temperature of 22 o C and RH 68 % for 12 months. 14 The product was stable under these conditions (average reduction in viability < 0.1 Log-values). The stability of the product was also shown at 30 o C, RH 75 % for 12 months (average reduction in viability < 0.1 Log-values). 15 Three batches of InteSwine were chosen at random and were added each to the three lots of a vitamin/mineral premixture (nine replicates in total). 16 The stability was examined over a period of six months under ambient conditions with an average temperature of 22 C. Results indicated that the 8 Technical dossier/section II 9 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annex 4 10 This section has been edited following the provisions of Article 8(6) and Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/ Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annex 1 12 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annex 2 13 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annex 3 14 Technical dossier/section II/Reference 2 15 Technical dossier/section II/Reference 3 16 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annexes 5_1-5_2 6

7 product is stable for at least six months in a piglet premixture (start 8.9 x CFU/kg, reducing to 7.6 x CFU/kg). The stability of the additive was examined in typical piglet feeds supplemented with InteSwine at 5 x CFU/kg (three additive batches in three different feeds). 17 Ten subsamples of each of the three feeds were analysed for the stability over a period of three months under ambient conditions and with an average temperature of 22 C. The stability of InteSwine was also evaluated in pelleted feeds (the mash feeds used above were pelleted at 85 C). 18 Ten subsamples were analysed for the stability over a period of three months at ambient conditions and at an average temperature of 22 C. Results of these studies (table 2) show that the product is stable for three months in compound mash feed, during pelleting and during storage of pelleted feed. Table. 2 Stability of InteSwine in piglet feeds Duration of storage Day 0 Mash feed (CFU/kg) 3 months Mash feed (CFU/kg) Feed before pelleting (CFU/kg) 3 months after pelleting (CFU/kg) Average 5.2 x x x x Standard 1.3 x x x x deviation CV (%) 26 % 20 % 18 % 15 % The feeds used in the stability trial were also used to evaluate the homogenous distribution of the additive in piglet feed. 19 In 30 subsamples of mash feed (10 sub-samples of three batches), a CV of 19 % was found. In 30 subsamples of pelleted feeds (as above), the CV was of 17 % Conditions of use The product is intended for use in complete feed for weaned piglets at a minimum content of 6 x 10 9 and a maximum content of 4 x CFU/kg feedstuffs Evaluation of the analytical methods by the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) EFSA has verified the EURL report as it relates to the methods used for the control of the active agent in animal feed. The Executive Summary of the EURL report can be found in the Appendix. 3. Safety Saccharomyces cerevisiae is considered by the EFSA to be suitable for the QPS approach to safety assessment (EFSA, 2010). In the view of the FEEDAP Panel, the identity of the production strain is established as S. cerevisiae and therefore safety for the target species, consumer and the environment is presumed. An acute dermal irritation study according to OECD 404 and an acute eye irritation study according to OECD 405 were conducted in New Zealand Rabbits. 20 The product caused transient erythema in the acute dermal irritation study, disappearing after 24 hours and no eye irritation. Consequently, the test sample was evaluated as non-irritant. 20 No study on skin sensitisation was provided. 17 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annexes 5_3-5_8 18 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annexes 5_9-5_11 19 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annexes 6_1-6_2 20 Technical dossier/supplementary information Mar 11/Annex 7 7

8 As the product InteSwine does not contain particles smaller than 100 µm, it is not expected to present an inhalation hazard for workers. 4. Efficacy Three trials were performed in two different Member States. The studies had an essentially similar design with weaned animals of both sexes (cross-breeds with initial weights of kg) allocated to two groups of the same size, one serving as the control and the other receiving the same basal diet (in mash form, except for trial 2) supplemented with the additive. In each trial, doses of InteSwine were confirmed by analyses. All trials were of 42 days duration. Data were analysed as a block design using the GLM procedure (feed intake measured at the pen level, weight gain measured individually, the experimental unit was the pen). Table 3 shows further aspects of the experimental designs and the resulting zootechnical performances of the animals. Table 3. Zootechnical performances of weaned piglets supplemented with InteSwine Trial number Total number of piglets (Replicates/treatment X Animals/replicate) (12 X 9) (12 X 10) Dose (CFU/kg feed) Final weight (kg) 0 6 x (6 X 13) a,b For a given trial, treatment means differ significantly P< 0.05 ADG: average daily gain ADG (kg) Feed to gain 0.40 a 1.89 a 0.43 b 1.69 b a 0.32 a x b 0.34 b a 0.26 a 1.76 a 1.2 x b 0.29 b 1.50 b Growth performance was significantly improved in each of the trials and feed conversion in two studies. Feed intake was not significantly affected. However, the studies were made with doses ranging from the lowest recommended dose to the highest. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that InteSwine has the potential to improve growth performance of piglets at a dose of 4 x CFU/kg feed. 5. Post-market monitoring The FEEDAP Panel considers that there is no need for specific requirements for a post-market monitoring plan other than those established in the Feed Hygiene Regulation 24 and Good Manufacturing Practice. CONCLUSIONS The active agent has been identified as a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and consequently meets the qualifications required by the QPS approach. It can thus be presumed safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. 21 Technical dossier/section IV/Annexes IV_Reference_9 and Technical dossier/section IV/Annexes IV_Reference_11 and Technical dossier/section IV/Annexes IV_Reference_13 and OJ L 35, , p. 1. 8

9 The additive is not irritant to skin and eyes. As the product InteSwine does not contain particles smaller than 100 µm, it is not expected to present an inhalation hazard for workers. InteSwine has the potential to improve growth performance of weaned piglets at a dose of 4 x CFU/kg feed. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. InteSwine for piglets. June Submitted by RM Associates Ltd. 2. InteSwine for piglets. Supplementary information. March Submitted by RM Associates Ltd. 3. Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the methods(s) of analysis for InteSwine. 4. Comments from Member States received through the ScienceNet. REFERENCES EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update. EFSA Journal 2010;8(12):1944. [56 pp.] Fernández-Espinar MT, López V, Ramón D, Bartra E and Querol A (2001). Study of the authenticity of commercial wine yeast strains by molecular techniques. International Journal of Food Microbiology 70 (2001)

10 APPENDIX Executive Summary of the Evaluation Report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives on the Method(s) of Analysis for InteSwine In the current application authorisation is sought under article 4(1) for product InteSwine under the category 'zootechnical additives', functional group 4(b) 'gut flora stabilisers', according to Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. The active component of InteSwine is a pure culture of the strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625, with a minimum concentration of 9 x Colony Forming Units (CFU)/g. Specifically, the authorisation is sought for the use of inteswine for weaned piglets. The feed additive is intended to be mixed to complete feedingstuffs at a dose ranging from 6 x 10 9 to 4.5 x CFU/kg of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625. For the enumeration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 in feed additive, premixtures and feedingstuffs the Applicant proposes the ring trial validated CEN pour plate method for the enumeration of yeast probiotic strains (EN 15789), using yeast extract dextrose chloramphenicol agar (CGYE). The performance characteristics of the EN method reported after logarithmic transformation (CFU) are: - a repeatability standard deviation (s r ) ranging from 0.17 to 0.36 log 10 CFU/g, - a reproducibility standard deviation (s R ) ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 log 10 CFU/g; and - a limit of detection (LOD) of 1 x 10 5 CFU/kg, well below the minimum dose proposed by the applicant (6x10 9 CFU/kg of feedingstuffs). Based on these performance characteristics the EURL recommends, for official control, the CEN method EN for the enumeration of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R-625 in feed additives, premixtures and feedingstuffs. Molecular methods were used by the Applicant for identification of the active agent. The EURL recommends for official control Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), a generally recognised standard methodology for identification of yeasts. Further testing or validation of the methods to be performed through the consortium of National Reference Laboratories as specified by article 10 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005) is not considered necessary. 10

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1 EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2443 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1 EFSA Panel on

More information

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Actisaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for rabbits for fattening and non foodproducing rabbits 1, 2 EFSA Panel on

More information

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1 The EFSA Journal (2007) 585, 1-9 Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1 The EFSA Journal (2008) 837, 1-10 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and

More information

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1 EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2526 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1 EFSA Panel

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4199 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Biosprint (Saccharomyces cerevisiae MUCL 39885) for minor ruminant species for meat and milk production

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2012;10(2):2575 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-beta-xylanase) as feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared

More information

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2 The EFSA Journal (2008) 772, 1-9 Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2 Scientific Opinion of the

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 European

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2 EFSA Journal 211;9(6):2275 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 3236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2 EFSA Panel on Additives and

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 212;1(6):2728 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of AveMix XG 1 (endo-1,4- beta-xylanase and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase) as feed additive for laying hens and

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009 The EFSA Journal (2009) 970, 1-9 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Biosprint (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for sows 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2681 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on safety and efficacy of sodium benzoate, propionic acid and sodium propionate for pigs, poultry, bovines, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of the authorisation of AveMix XG 10 (endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Natuphos (3-phytase) for minor avian species (quails, pheasants, partridges, guinea fowl, geese, pigeons, ostriches, peacocks, flamingos)

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) for turkeys for fattening, ducks, geese, pigeons and other game birds for meat production, ducks, geese,

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3970 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bacillus subtilis PB6 (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for laying hens and minor poultry species for

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2 EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2617 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of a red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens (Panaferd-AX) as feed additive for salmon and trout 1 EFSA

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1 EFSA Journal 2009; 7(10):1353 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(5):4106 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Rovabio Spiky (endo-1,4- beta-xylanase and endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase) as a feed additive for turkeys and

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in

More information

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007 The EFSA Journal (2007) 549, 1-11 Safety and efficacy of Toyocerin (Bacillus cereus var. Toyoi) as a feed additive for turkeys 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3966 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Biomin C3 (Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius ssp. salivarius and Enterococcus

More information

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007 The EFSA Journal (2007) 573, 1-5 Compatibility of the microbial preparation of licheniformis and subtilis (BioPlus 2B) with the coccidiostat lasalocid A sodium in feed for turkeys 1 Scientific Opinion

More information

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007 The EFSA Journal (2007) 520, 1-8 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety and efficacy of the enzyme preparation Safizym X (endo-1,4-beta-xylanase)

More information

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 ABSTRACT European

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7 The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the modification of terms of authorisation of the micro-organism preparation

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1 EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2882 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium hydroxide for dogs, cats and ornamental fish 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1 EFSA Journal 2013;11(4):3177 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 1-7 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4158 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Cylactin (Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415) as a feed additive for pigs for fattening, piglets and sows

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

More information

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1 The EFSA Journal (2007) 614, 1-5 Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (Question

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in

More information

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9 The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety and efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9 The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety of the new granulate formulation of the enzyme preparation Grindazym

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1 EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2784 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q ) The EFSA Journal (2008) 912, 1-13 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Probiotic LACTINA (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus lactis, Streptococcus

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2013;11(4):3175 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Provita LE (Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) as a feed additive for calves for rearing

More information

Session 47.

Session 47. Session 47 montserrat.anguita@efsa.europa.eu Assessment of feed additives that improve the diet utilisation in the European Union M. Anguita, J. Galobart, C. Roncancio-Peña FEEDAP Unit EAAP 2009 Barcelona,

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Statement on the establishment of guidelines for the assessment of additives from the functional group substances for reduction of the contamination of feed by 1 EFSA Panel on Additives

More information

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9 The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety and efficacy of the product Biosaf Sc 47, a preparation of Saccharomyces

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(7):4157 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of VevoVitall (benzoic acid) as a feed additive for pigs for reproduction (gestating and lactating sows, boars

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probiotic LACTINA (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus lactis, Streptococcus

More information

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1 EFSA Journal 2013;11(5):3205 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives D08/FSQ/CVH/RL/D(2008) 23555 CRL Evaluation Report on the

More information

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11 The EFSA Journal (26) 46, 1-11 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety and efficacy of the microbiological product 35, a preparation of

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6 The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on a request from the Commission on the safety of the product Lactiferm for

More information

CNCM I-1079 (FAD ; CRL/100166)

CNCM I-1079 (FAD ; CRL/100166) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Directorate D: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives Ref. Ares(2015)76595-09/01/2015

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6 The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety of the enzyme preparation Bio-Feed Wheat for use as feed additive

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3722 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Rovabio Excel (endo- 1,3(4)-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase) as a feed additive for lactating

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1154, 1-11 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion

More information

Bacillus subtilis GR-101 Aspergillus oryzae GB-107

Bacillus subtilis GR-101 Aspergillus oryzae GB-107 EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives JRC.DDG.D.6/CvH/DM/hn/ARES (2010) 212880 CRL Evaluation Report

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(9):4239 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sorbic acid and potassium sorbate when used as technological additives for all animal species based on two

More information

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer) SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 22 October 2015 PUBLISHED: 13 November 2015 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4276 Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive

More information

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 12 July 2016 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4556 Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM 32074 as a silage additive for all animal species EFSA Panel on Additives and

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1155, 1-14 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1 Scientific Opinion

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on DLmethionine, DLmethionine sodium salt, the hydroxy analogue of methionine and the calcium salt of methionine hydroxy analogue in all animal species; on the isopropyl

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1 EFSA Journal 2013;11(3):3106 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of diclazuril (Clinacox 0.5 %) as feed additive for chickens reared for laying 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 21 March 2017 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4763 Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used

More information

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008 The EFSA Journal (2008) 773, 1-13 Safety and efficacy of Ecobiol (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens) as feed additive for chickens for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives JRC.DG.D6/CvH/CMP/mds/ARES(2010)757602 CRL Evaluation Report

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3606 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of disodium 5 -ribonucleotides, disodium 5 -guanylate, disodium 5 -inosinate for all animal species and categories

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1 EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3969 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety of Hostazym X as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6 The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on a request from the Commission on the safety of the Chelated forms of iron,

More information

Lactiferm NCIMB 11181

Lactiferm NCIMB 11181 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory Feed Additives D08/FSQ/CVH/CMP/mdr/ARES (2009)242873 CRL

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 24 January 2017 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4704 Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NBRC 0203), Lactobacillus plantarum (NBRC 3070) and Lactobacillus casei (NBRC 3425) as a

More information

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5 The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on a request from the Commission on safety of formaldehyde for poultry as feed

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1039, 1-16 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of Miya-Gold S (Clostridium butyricum) as feed additive for chickens for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) The EFSA Journal (29) 197, 1-2 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Safety and efficacy of the product Ronozyme NP (6-phytase) for use as feed additive for poultry, weaned piglets and pigs for fattening 1 Scientific Opinion

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all animal species as preservative and silage additive, for pets and other non food-producing animals (non-food

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2012;10(3):2625 SCIENTIFIC PININ Scientific pinion on the safety and efficacy of phenyl ethyl alcohols, phenylacetic acids, related esters, phenoxyacetic acids and related esters (chemical

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5 The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety of the enzymatic product Avizyme 1500 for use as feed additive

More information

DSM (FAD ; CRL/160006)

DSM (FAD ; CRL/160006) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Directorate F Health, Consumers and Reference Materials European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives Ref. Ares(2016)6157973-27/10/2016

More information

TAK 59 NCIMB (FAD ; CRL/150002)

TAK 59 NCIMB (FAD ; CRL/150002) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Directorate D: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives Ref. Ares(2015)4525308-23/10/2015

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of propionic acid, sodium propionate, calcium propionate and ammonium propionate for all animal species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products

More information

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6 The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety of the enzyme preparation Econase Wheat Plus for use as feed additive

More information

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 20 October 2015 PUBLISHED: 10 November 2015 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4270 Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1 EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3731 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on (6-phytase) as feed additive for chickens and turkeys for fattening, laying hens, and piglets (weaned), pigs for fattening and sows (poultry and pigs) 1 EFSA Panel

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed

More information

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1 The EFSA Journal (2008) 696, 1-12 Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1 Updated Scientific Opinion of

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Prostora Max (Bifidobacterium animalis) as a feed additive for dogs 1, 2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Prostora Max (Bifidobacterium animalis) as a feed additive for dogs 1, 2 EFSA Journal 2012;10(12):2964 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Prostora Max (Bifidobacterium animalis) as a feed additive for dogs 1, 2 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products

More information

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150021)

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150021) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Directorate D: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives Ref. Ares(2016)1889098-21/04/2016

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances

More information

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150019)

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150019) EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Directorate D: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives Ref. Ares(2016)1888842-21/04/2016

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3 EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4055 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Cibenza EP150 (a preparation of Bacillus licheniformis (ATCC 53757) and its protease (EC 3.4.21.19)) as

More information

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1 EFSA Journal 2013;11(10):3437 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of L-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate as a flavouring additive for pets 1 EFSA Panel on Additives and Products

More information

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager Feed Additive Approval An Industry View Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager Classification of substances and products used in Animal Nutrition Processing Aid (EC No 1831/2003) Veterinary Substance / Products

More information