Physical breakdown of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort, spurrey and perennial ryegrass when eaten by sheep and when macerated
|
|
- Justina Hines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (1997), 129, Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom 419 Physical breakdown of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort, spurrey and perennial ryegrass when eaten by sheep and when macerated D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3AL, UK Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK (Revised MS received 12 March 1997) SUMMARY Six plant species were compared in terms of their physical breakdown when eaten by sheep and when macerated: chickweed (Stellaria media (L.) Vill.), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber), dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.), ribwort (Plantago lanceolata L.), spurrey (Spergula arvensis L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). In two experiments at Aberystwyth in 1985 and 1986, the species were artificially dried and fed to lambs as the total diet. In another experiment in 1987, they were fed fresh, in 1 5 min meals, to yearling sheep. Perennial ryegrass was more difficult to break down than the dicotyledonous species, judging by the particle size distribution in macerated and in chewed material and in the rumen contents and from the rather long time the sheep spent eating and ruminating per 100 g dry matter (DM) intake and the rather high fibrosity index. The width of some of the smaller ryegrass particles in the rumen was such that they must have contained only a single vein. Spurrey was readily broken down by macerating and by chewing and a relatively short time was spent eating and ruminating per 100 g DM intake. The shape of spurrey particles in the rumen was quite similar to that of stemmy ryegrass particles and the fibrosity index of spurrey was high. The breakdown of chickweed was similar to that of spurrey, but the fibrosity index of chickweed was lower. Accumulation of DM in the caecum appeared particularly pronounced in sheep fed ribwort or dock. The dock particles in the rumen typically had a low ratio of length to width and it seemed that dock particles did not need to be reduced in size as much as ryegrass particles before passing out of the rumen. INTRODUCTION The physical breakdown of food is important in relation both to intake and to digestion. The voluntary intake of fibrous food, including forage, by ruminants can be restricted by the rate and extent of breakdown into particles small enough to pass out of the reticulorumen (Moseley & Jones 1984; Ulyatt et al. 1986). Similarly, digestibility can be restricted by lack of access by rumen microbes to blocks of thick-walled cells in incompletely broken down particles of fibrous food (Wilson & Mertens 1995). Plants which may be eaten by ruminants vary enormously in morphology and anatomy and hence are likely to vary in the ways in which they break into particles, and in the ease of breakdown, during eating and rumination. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), the major sown herbage species in the UK, has the advantage of being tough enough to stand up to intensive treading by grazing animals (Spedding & Diekmahns 1972), but this toughness may be a disadvantage from the point of view of providing a diet which is easy and quick to eat. Wilman & Riley (1993) compared 15 grassland species in a search for types of plant which seemed likely to be broken down easily in the mouth and rumen and which, as a result, had a high potential intake. From that study, two annual and three perennial herbaceous, dicotyledonous non-legumes were selected as being of sufficient promise and interest to be compared with perennial ryegrass in feeding experiments: chickweed (Stellaria media (L.) Vill.), common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Weber), broad-leaved dock (Rumex obtusifolius L.), ribwort (Plantago lanceolata L.) and spurrey (Spergula arvensis L.). The intake by sheep and the digestibility of these five species and perennial ryegrass were reported by Derrick et al. (1993). As part of the same project, the extent to which the diets were broken
2 420 D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY down in the sheep was recorded by sieving oesophageal extrusa and the contents of the reticulorumen, omasum, abomasum and caecum and the faeces. The diets were also macerated and sieved and were tested for fibrosity and for the time the sheep spent eating and ruminating. The dimensions of particles were recorded at the reticulo-rumen stage. The objective was to identify differences between the six plant species in breakdown characteristics, as a contribution to an improved understanding of forage utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS The sowing and management of the field plots and the three feeding experiments were described by Derrick et al. (1993). The six species were grown at Aberystwyth, using a randomized block design with two blocks, each of six plots. Experiment 1, 1985 The plots were sown at the beginning of August 1985 and harvested on 28 October The harvested crops were artificially dried on a moving bed, lowtemperature grass drier and fed ad libitum, without any supplement, to castrated male lambs (c. 32kg liveweight (LW)), in individual pens, for c. 20 days, of which the final 12 days were used for recording intake and digestibility. Immediately after this period, the lambs were slaughtered and the reticulo-rumen removed. Initially, 12 lambs were used, two per diet, in a randomized block design; later, a further four lambs were used, one fed on chickweed, two on ryegrass and one on spurrey. Fibrosity index (Hides et al. 1983) was determined by milling two 5 g samples per plot of dried crop. One 3 g sample per plot of dried crop was cut into 2 cm lengths, soaked overnight in water and macerated for 1 min in 150 ml of water in a 250 ml round-bottomed flask, using an Ultra Turrex (Janke and Kunkel) macerator which had two revolving blades surrounded by a non-revolving blade. The macerated crop was separated into fractions of different particle size using an Analysette 3 (Fritsch GMBH) wet sieve shaker with sieve mesh sizes 4, 2, 1, 0 5, 0 25 and mm according to Moseley (1984). The wet sieve shaker was also used to separate c. 2 5 g dry weight per lamb of rumen contents into fractions of different particle size. Particles which will pass through a 1 mm sieve can be regarded as small enough to pass from the reticulo-rumen of the sheep to the omasum and abomasum (Poppi et al. 1985). Experiment 2, 1986 The plots were harvested on 23 June and 1 October 1986 and the material was artificially dried. The chickweed and spurrey plots were re-sown on 30 June 1986 and one of the ribwort plots on 9 July. Insufficient dandelion was harvested in 1986 for a feeding experiment. The dried crops of the remaining five species, cut on 1 October, together with the Junecut ryegrass, were fed ad libitum, without any supplementation, to castrated male lambs (c. 34 kg LW) in metabolism cages for c. 19 days, of which the final 9 days were used for recording digestibility, intake and time spent eating and ruminating. Thirtysix lambs were used, six per diet, in a randomized block design. All the lambs were then slaughtered; the rumen contents were recovered from the lambs of four replicates and the omasum, abomasum and caecum contents were recovered from the lambs of three of those replicates. The fibrosity index of the dried crop and the particle size distribution of the macerated crop and of the rumen contents were determined as in Expt 1. The particle size distribution of the omasum, abomasum and caecum contents was determined as for the rumen contents; the same procedure was used to estimate the particle size distribution of the faeces, except that each faeces sample was boiled for 60 min in 100 ml of neutral detergent solution before sieving, in order to break up clumps of particles which were stuck together. The time spent eating and ruminating was estimated by using a jaw balloon and pressure transducer. Experiment 3, 1987 The same species and plots were used as in Expt 1. The plots were cut and raked clear on 26 May and 20 July The chickweed and spurrey plots were re-sown on 2 July. Sufficient material was cut each morning for feeding to sheep in each of four 6-day periods, beginning on 24 August, 7 September, 21 September and 5 October. The periods species interaction (15 D.F.) was used to calculate the S.E. The fibrosity index of oven-dried crop samples was determined as in Expt 1, but using 24 samples per species. The particle size distribution of the macerated crop was determined as in Expt 1, but using 16 samples per species; each sample had been preserved by freezing and contained c. 2 5 g dry matter (DM). In each of the four 6-day periods, fresh material of each species was fed to each of two oesophagealfistulated sheep. The chewed forage was collected from the fistula in a polythene bag, within a linen bag tied round the sheep s neck. The sheep were adult castrate males (c. 54 kg LW). The particle size distribution of the chewed crop, recovered from the oesophageal fistula, was determined by sieving in one or two samples per sheep per period, using the same sieves as in Expt 1; each sample had been preserved by freezing and contained c. 2 5 g DM.
3 Physical breakdown of six grassland species 421 Table 1. Fibrosity index of diets and time spent by sheep eating and ruminating Ryegrass Chickweed Dandelion Dock Ribwort Spurrey Leafy Stemmy S.E. Mean Fibrosity index (5 D.F.) Experiment Experiment 2 23 June 1986 harvest* October 1986 harvest* Experiment Time spent eating (minutes) (19 D.F.) Experiment 2 Per day Per 100 g dry matter intake Per 100 g cell wall intake Time spent ruminating (minutes) (19 D.F.) Experiment 2 Per day Per 100 g dry matter intake Per 100 g cell wall intake * Sown species only. Full records were obtained from different numbers of sheep on different diets (6 on the chickweed and stemmy ryegrass diets, 4 on spurrey and leafy ryegrass, 3 on ribwort and 2 on dock). The S.E. s listed are for comparing chickweed with spurrey; appropriate adjustment is needed for the other comparisons, e.g. to compare dock with ribwort multiply the listed S.E. by1 41.
4 422 D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY Table 2. Breakdown of diet into particles when macerated and when chewed by sheep Ryegrass Chickweed Dandelion Dock Ribwort Spurrey Leafy Stemmy S.E. Mean After maceration Experiment 1 (5 D.F.) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Experiment 2 (5 D.F.) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Percentage of particulate dry matter retained on the 4 mm sieve Experiment 3 (15 D.F.) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Percentage of particulate dry matter retained on the 4 mm sieve After chewing Experiment 3 (15 D.F.) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Percentage of particulate dry matter retained on the 4 mm sieve
5 Physical breakdown of six grassland species 423 Table 3. Particulate and soluble dry matter in the rumen* of sheep and weight of rumen* contents Ryegrass Chickweed Dandelion Dock Ribwort Spurrey Leafy Stemmy S.E. Mean Experiment 1 (8 D.F.) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Percentage of particulate dry matter (a) On the 4 mm sieve (b) On the 2 mm sieve (c) On the 1 mm sieve (d) On the 0 5 mm sieve (e) On the 0 25 mm sieve (f) On the mm sieve (g) Passing through the mm sieve Experiment 2 (15 D.F.) Fresh weight of rumen contents (g) Dry weight of rumen contents (g) (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (c) Soluble dry matter Percentage of particulate dry matter (a) On the 4 mm sieve (b) On the 2 mm sieve (c) On the 1 mm sieve (d) On the 0 5 mm sieve (e) On the 0 25 mm sieve (f) On the mm sieve (g) Passing through the mm sieve * Includes the reticulum. Rumen contents were obtained from different numbers of sheep on different diets (4 on ryegrass, 3 on chickweed and spurrey, 2 on dandelion and 1 on dock and ribwort). The S.E.s listed are for comparing chickweed with spurrey; appropriate adjustment is needed for the other comparisons, e.g. to compare dock with ribwort multiply the listed S.E. by1 73.
6 424 D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY RESULTS The fibrosity index (Table 1) of spurrey was consistently high (i.e. a relatively large amount of energy was required to mill the crop). The fibrosity index of chickweed and dandelion was consistently low; that of dock was intermediate; that of ribwort was low in Expt 1, but high in the other two experiments (when the crop contained more stem); that of ryegrass was high except in October The time spent eating and ruminating per 100 g DM intake and per 100 g cell wall intake in Expt 2 (Table 1) was consistently higher in stemmy (Junecut) ryegrass than in spurrey (P 0 05). The time spent eating and ruminating chickweed and dock was low in relation to DM intake, but high in relation to cell wall intake. Time spent ruminating relative to time spent eating was greater in chickweed, ryegrass and spurrey than in ribwort and dock. The plant material which was most difficult to break down by maceration or chewing was ryegrass, particularly the stemmy crop harvested in June 1986, as indicated by the higher percentage of particulate DM retained on the largest sieve used (4 mm) on the ryegrass than on any of the other diets (P 0 01) (Table 2). The greater resistance to breakdown of ryegrass compared with the dicotyledonous species was also shown by the relatively high percentage of total sample DM retained above the 1 mm sieve (that on the 1 mm sieve plus that on the 2 and 4 mm sieves). The percentage of total sample DM retained above the 1 mm sieve was high in dandelion and low in chickweed, dock and spurrey. The percentage of sample DM which was particulate DM below the 1 mm sieve was consistently higher in dock than in ryegrass (P 0 01). The percentage of sample DM which was soluble was consistently high in chickweed. Chewing by sheep did not break the diets down as much as did the maceration technique which was used; the difference between chewing and maceration was greater with the dicotyledonous species than with ryegrass and was shown particularly in the percentage of particulate DM retained on the 4 mm sieve. The greater difficulty in breaking down ryegrass compared with the dicotyledonous species was evident in the size of particles in the rumen, a relatively high percentage of rumen particulate DM being retained on the 4 mm sieve on ryegrass diets, compared in particular with spurrey (P 0 01) (Table 3). The percentage of rumen particulate DM on the 1, 0 5 and 0 25 mm sieves was lower with the leafy (October-cut) ryegrass than with the spurrey diet (P 0 01). On the other hand, the percentage of rumen particulate DM which passed through the mm sieve was greater with leafy ryegrass than with spurrey (P 0 05). The rumen contents of the sheep fed stemmy (June-cut) ryegrass had a high percentage of total DM retained above the 1 mm sieve (that on the 1 mm sieve plus that on the 2 and 4 mm sieves) and a low percentage of soluble DM, but this was not the case with leafy (October-cut) ryegrass. The percentage of rumen contents DM made up of particles which passed through the 1 mm sieve was high on the dock diet in Expt 1 and on dock, ribwort and spurrey in Expt 2. Table 4. Dimensions of sieved particles from the rumen* of sheep in Expt 2 Ryegrass Mean length and width (mm) of S.E. sieved particles Chickweed Dock Ribwort Spurrey Leafy Stemmy (15 D.F) Mean (a) On the 1 mm sieve (i) Length (ii) Width (iii) Length width (b) On the 0 5 mm sieve (i) Length (ii) Width (iii) Length width (c) On the 0 25 mm sieve (i) Length (ii) Width (iii) Length width (d) On the mm sieve (i) Length (ii) Width (iii) Length width * Includes the reticulum.
7 Physical breakdown of six grassland species 425 Table 5. Weight of contents of omasum, abomasum and caecum and particulate and soluble dry matter in omasum, abomasum, caecum and faeces in Expt 2 Ryegrass S.E. Chickweed Dock Ribwort Spurrey Leafy Stemmy (10 D.F.) Mean Dry weight of contents (g) (a) Omasum (b) Abomasum (c) Caecum (a) Dry matter retained above the 1 mm sieve (i) Omasum (ii) Abomasum (iii) Caecum (iv) Faeces (b) Particulate dry matter below the 1 mm sieve (i) Omasum (ii) Abomasum (iii) Caecum (iv) Faeces (c) Soluble dry matter (i) Omasum (ii) Abomasum (iii) Caecum (iv) Faeces
8 426 D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY The dry weight of the rumen contents was greater on the spurrey and dock diets than on leafy ryegrass or chickweed in Expt 2 (P 0 05). Plant particles in the rumen of sheep fed leafy ryegrass were typically rather long and thin (Table 4); the mean ratio of length to width was 9:1 for particles on the 0 25 and mm sieves with the leafy ryegrass diet, a significantly wider ratio (P 0 01) than was recorded with any of the other diets. At the other extreme of particle shape were those on the 1 and 0 5 mm sieves from the rumen of sheep fed dock, with a mean ratio of length to width of 2:1. The dry weight of omasum contents was higher on the dock and spurrey than on the chickweed and leafy ryegrass diets (P 0 05); the dry weight of abomasum contents was higher on the dock and spurrey diets than on ribwort (P 0 05); and the dry weight of the caecum contents was higher on the dock and ribwort than on any of the other four diets (P 0 05) (Table 5). The percentage of total sample DM which was retained above the 1 mm sieve was low on all six Expt 2 diets in the omasum, abomasum and caecum contents and in the faeces; the percentage was higher with dock than with some of the other species, particularly in the abomasum and caecum contents. In the omasum, abomasum and caecum contents and in the faeces, the percentage of total sample DM which was in the form of particles which passed through the 1 mm sieve was higher on the ribwort than on the leafy ryegrass diet (P 0 05) and the percentage of total sample DM which was soluble was particularly high on the leafy ryegrass diet. DISCUSSION The rather high fibrosity index of perennial ryegrass, the rather long time spent eating and ruminating per 100 g DM intake, the high proportion of particulate DM retained on the largest (4 mm) sieve, after macerating the diet, after chewing the diet and in the rumen contents, all indicate plant material which is rather tough and difficult to break down, compared with the material from temperate, dicotyledonous species. A similar conclusion was reached by Wilman & Riley (1993), who recorded fibrosity and particle size distribution after maceration, and by Wilman et al. (1996), who recorded rate of intake. The conclusion is reinforced by the low numbers of chews min of chewing activity and the below average weight of DM consumed min of chewing activity in the present Expt 3 (Derrick et al. 1993). Presumably the higher proportion of cell wall in the grass than in the dicotyledonous species (Derrick et al. 1993; Wilman & Riley 1993) is one reason for the greater resistance to breakdown of the grass. Derrick et al. (1993) noted that the voluntary intake of perennial ryegrass compared with that of the dicotyledonous species was not as high as might have been predicted from the high digestibility of the ryegrass; presumably voluntary intake is limited by the slow rate of breakdown of perennial ryegrass in the mouth and rumen. The greater resistance to maceration of stemmy compared with leafy ryegrass (Table 2) did not seem to be associated with much difference in voluntary intake between stemmy and leafy ryegrass (Derrick et al. 1993); it seems likely that the sheep compensated to some extent for the greater resistance to breakdown of the stemmy material by spending rather more time eating and ruminating (Table 1). The ratio of length to width in the particles recovered from the rumen of the sheep fed leafy perennial ryegrass in Expt 2 (weighted mean over the four sieve sizes recorded 8 3) was similar to that recorded by Mtengeti et al. (1995) (8 8) in chewed, leafy perennial ryegrass, using the same cultivar, Melle, as in the present experiments. The mean width of rumen particles held on the mm sieve (the smallest sieve used) in the case of the leafy ryegrass diet, 0 12 mm, was less than the mean distance of 0 16 mm between adjacent veins in the intact perennial ryegrass leaf blades examined by Mtengeti et al. (1995), suggesting that ryegrass tissue can be reduced to single vein width if it receives enough chewing and stays in the rumen long enough. Many of the particles in the rumen appeared small enough to pass out of the rumen readily (as noted with grass diets by Poppi et al. 1981) and yet had been retained; their retention would presumably contribute to rumen-fill and hence restrict intake, but retention would presumably have the advantage of enhancing digestibility. Retention in the rumen may have been partly due to the long, thread-like ryegrass particles creating a matted structure which trapped some of the small particles, making it more difficult for the latter to move through the rumen contents into a position from which they might be presented for passage through the reticuloomasal orifice, as suggested by Moseley (1982) and Moseley & Jones (1984), when considering a comparison of perennial ryegrass with white clover. Even small particles are likely to contain blocks of tightly packed, thick-walled cells to which rumen microbes have only limited access (Wilson & Mertens 1995). Particles such as those on the 0 25 mm sieve from the rumen contents of sheep fed leafy ryegrass (which were 1 86 mm long and 0 19 mm wide on average) may contain 400 tightly packed, thick-walled cells (Fig. 5 of Wilson & Mertens (1995)). The high fibrosity index of spurrey might suggest plant material which is difficult to break down, leading to restricted intake (Chenost 1966). However, the voluntary intake of spurrey appears to be particularly high (recorded in Expts 1 and 2 of Derrick et al. (1993)), as does the rate of intake (Expt 3 of Derrick et al. (1993), Mtengeti et al. 1995; Wilman et al. 1996), showing that, when comparing
9 Physical breakdown of six grassland species 427 plant species of very different structure and morphology, recording fibrosity may be of limited value as a predictor of intake. Similarly, the suggestion of Troelsen & Campbell (1968) that plant species which break down into short, broad particles (lucerne in their case) are likely to have a higher voluntary intake than species which break into longer, thinner, more fibre-like particles (grasses in their case) is of doubtful value when a comparison involves a species such as spurrey; the particles of spurrey from the rumen which were measured in the present Expt 2 (Table 4) were similar in length and width to those derived from stemmy ryegrass, although the voluntary intake of spurrey was much higher than that of stemmy ryegrass (Derrick et al. 1993). Measures which did indicate the greater potential voluntary intake of spurrey than of perennial ryegrass were the greater breakdown of spurrey when macerated (Table 2 and Wilman & Riley (1993)) and when chewed (Table 2), the shorter time spent eating and ruminating spurrey per 100 g DM intake (Table 1) and the smaller proportion of large particles in the rumen of sheep on the spurrey diet (Table 3). Evidently spurrey, despite a rather high proportion of cell wall (as indicated by neutral detergent fibre, Derrick et al. (1993)) and a high fibrosity index, breaks down readily when eaten by sheep and is extremely palatable (as was noted many years ago by Fream (1900)). The other annual species examined, chickweed, broke down to a similar extent to spurrey when macerated (Table 2 and Wilman & Riley (1993)) and was fairly similar to spurrey in particle size distribution in the rumen, omasum and abomasum (Tables 3 and 5) and in the length and width of rumen particles (Table 4) and had a lower fibrosity index than spurrey. However, the voluntary intake and rate of intake of chickweed were appreciably lower than that of spurrey (Derrick et al. 1993). The chickweed appeared less palatable than spurrey and was perhaps less suitable as a food for sheep, as indicated by its higher K and lower Na concentration (Wilman & Derrick 1994), the greater weight of urine produced when it was fed (Wilman & Derrick 1994) and the solid, rather slimy nature of the rumen contents of sheep which had been fed chickweed. Dandelion was typical of the dicotyledonous species in breaking down more readily than perennial ryegrass when macerated or chewed (Table 2) and having a lower cell wall content than perennial ryegrass (Derrick et al. 1993; Wilman & Riley 1993). Dandelion also had a lower fibrosity index than perennial ryegrass (Table 1 and Wilman & Riley (1993)). It appears to be a palatable species, at least at the vegetative stage (Marten et al. 1987), with fairly high voluntary intake and rate of intake (Derrick et al. 1993). Ribwort also broke down more readily than perennial ryegrass when macerated or chewed (Table 2) and it had a lower cell wall content than perennial ryegrass (Derrick et al. 1993; Wilman & Riley 1993). Its leaf had a lower fibrosity index than perennial ryegrass leaf (Expt 1 and Wilman & Riley (1993)), but when the crop was stemmy (Expts 2 and 3) the fibrosity was rather high. A particularly high proportion of the DM in the omasum, abomasum, caecum and faeces of sheep fed ribwort was in the form of particles sufficiently small to pass through a 1 mm sieve, suggesting thorough breakdown in the mouth and rumen. The digestibility of the cell wall fraction of stemmy crops of ribwort was particularly low (Derrick et al. 1993), which could be a reason for the accumulation of DM in the caecum of sheep fed stemmy ribwort (Table 5). The following features of dock suggest that its voluntary intake and rate of intake might be high: ready breakdown during maceration (Table 2 and Wilman & Riley (1993)) or chewing (Table 2), a preponderance of small particles in the rumen (Table 3), particles with a low ratio of length to width (Table 4) and a low cell wall content (Derrick et al. 1993; Wilman & Riley 1993). The voluntary intake of dried dock was at least as high as that of leafy and stemmy ryegrass, chickweed and ribwort in Expt 2 of Derrick et al. (1993), but the rate of intake of the fresh crop, particularly when chopped, was low, presumably because of taste and or smell (Derrick et al. 1993). It appears from the present results that sheep may spend less time ruminating when fed dock rather than some other species and that a dock diet does not need to be broken down into quite such small particles before passing out of the rumen. However, perhaps partly because of the larger particles and the incomplete digestion which they represent, there may be some accumulation of material in the caecum. CHENOST, M. (1966). Fibrousness of forages: its determination and its relation to feeding value. In Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, 1966, pp Helsinki: Finnish Grassland Association. REFERENCES DERRICK, R. W., MOSELEY, G.& WILMAN, D. (1993). Intake, by sheep, and digestibility of chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, FREAM, W. (1900). The Complete Grazier and Farmers and
10 428 D. WILMAN, R. W. DERRICK AND G. MOSELEY Cattle-Breeders Assistant Forming a Compendium of Husbandry (originally written by W. Youatt), 14th edn. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son. HIDES, D. H., LOVATT, J. A.& HAYWARD, M. V. (1983). Influence of stage of maturity on the nutritive value of Italian ryegrasses. Grass and Forage Science 38, MARTEN, G. C., SHEAFFER, C. C. & WYSE, D. L. (1987). Forage nutritive value and palatability of perennial weeds. Agronomy Journal 79, MOSELEY, G. (1982). The role of physical breakdown in controlling the nutritive quality of forages. In Report for 1981, Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, pp Aberystwyth: Welsh Plant Breeding Station. MOSELEY, G. (1984). The analysis and description of particle size distribution of digesta. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants (Ed. P. M. Kennedy), pp Occasional Publication No. 1, Canadian Society of Animal Science, Edmonton, Alberta. MOSELEY, G.& JONES, J. R. (1984). The physical digestion of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens) in the foregut of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52, MTENGETI, E. J., WILMAN, D.& MOSELEY, G. (1995). Physical structure of white clover, rape, spurrey and perennial ryegrass in relation to rate of intake by sheep, chewing activity and particle breakdown. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125, POPPI, D. P., MINSON, D. J. & TERNOUTH, J. H. (1981). Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. III. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, POPPI, D. P., HENDRICKSEN, R. E.& MINSON, D. J. (1985). The relative resistance to escape of leaf and stem particles from the rumen of cattle and sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, SPEDDING, C. R. W. & DIEKMAHNS, E. C. (Eds) (1972). Grasses and legumes in British agriculture. Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops Bulletin no. 49. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. TROELSEN, J. E. & CAMPBELL, J. B. (1968). Voluntary consumption of forage by sheep and its relation to the size and shape of particles in the digestive tract. Animal Production 10, ULYATT, M. J., DELLOW, D. W., JOHN, A., REID, C.S.W.& WAGHORN, G. C. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the ruminoreticulum. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Eds L. P. Milligan, W. L. Grovum & A. Dobson), pp Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. WILMAN, D.& DERRICK, R. W. (1994). Concentration and availability to sheep of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na in chickweed, dandelion, dock, ribwort and spurrey, compared with perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, WILMAN, D.& RILEY, J. A. (1993). Potential nutritive value of a wide range of grassland species. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, WILMAN, D., MTENGETI, E. J.& MOSELEY, G. (1996). Physical structure of twelve forage species in relation to rate of intake by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 126, WILSON, J. R. & MERTENS, D. R. (1995). Cell wall accessibility and cell structure limitations to microbial digestion of forage. Crop Science 35,
LARGE PARTICLE BREAKDOWN BY CATTLE EATING RYEGRASS AND ALFALFA
LARGE PARTICLE BREAKDOWN BY CATTLE EATING RYEGRASS AND ALFALFA M. N. McLeod 1 and D. J. Minson: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia ABSTRACT The proportion of large particles (LP) broken down to small, insoluble
More informationThe use of n-alkanes to estimate supplementary grass silage intake in grazing dairy cows
Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (1998), 131, 205 209. 1998 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom 205 The use of n-alkanes to estimate supplementary grass silage intake in
More informationFIBER DIGESTIBILITY AND FORAGE FRAGILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE. K. Cotanch and R. Grant William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY
FIBER DIGESTIBILITY AND FORAGE FRAGILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE K. Cotanch and R. Grant William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY Physically Effective Fiber System INTRODUCTION Mertens (1997)
More informationINTAKE AND QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF GUINEA GRASS GRAZED BY SHEEP OVER THREE DIFFERENT SEASONS. W.A. van Niekerk. Africa
INTAKE AND QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF GUINEA GRASS GRAZED BY SHEEP OVER THREE DIFFERENT SEASONS ID # 09-40 W.A. van Niekerk Department of Animal & Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002,
More informationSCREENING FRESH FORAGES FOR PROTEIN DEGRADATION AND NUTRITIVE VALUE. G.C. Waghorn 1 and J.L. Burke 2. Abstract
SCREENING FRESH FORAGES FOR PROTEIN DEGRADATION AND NUTRITIVE VALUE ID # 09-57 G.C. Waghorn 1 and J.L. Burke 2 1 AgResearch Grasslands, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand. waghorng@agresearch.cri.nz
More informationHarvesting sulla for yield and quality
E.M.K. Minnee, SJ Bluett, and S.L.Woodward Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton Abstract Deciding when to harvest sulla (Hedysarum coronarium) can be a compromise between herbage yield and forage nutritive
More informationResistance of leaf and stem fractions of tropical forage to chewing and passage in cattle
Brirish Journal of Nutrition (1 990), 63, 105-1 I9 105 Resistance of leaf and stem fractions of tropical forage to chewing and passage in cattle BY M.N. McLEOD, P. M. KENNEDY* AND D. J. MINSON CSIRO, Division
More informationA comparison of lter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages
Animal Feed Science and Technology 84 (2000) 33±47 A comparison of lter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages Dr. D. Wilman *, A. Adesogan Welsh
More informationCHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message
TOC INDEX CHAMPION Feed Services Ltd. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett Take Home Message The new Nutrient Requirements (NRC) of Beef Cattle published
More informationU S C on, hns Jo a elin C
What do animals eat? What do feeds provide? What is a nutrient? Chemical substance that provides Chemical substance that provides nourishment for the body What types of nutrients are there? What types
More informationBeef Cattle Nutrient Requirements
Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements Nutrients Required by Beef Cattle Beef cattle require nutrients to support body maintenance, reproduction, lactation, and growth. The nutritional needs of beef cattle
More informationThe four stomachs of a dairy cow
The four stomachs of a dairy cow Left side view 1) Rumen 2) Reticulum 3) Omasum 4) Abomasum Reticulo-omasal orifice (reticulo-rumen exit) (on the right side of the cow) (on the right side of the cow) Esophagus
More informationBeef Cattle Nutrient Requirements
Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements Nutrients Required by Beef Cattle Beef cattle require nutrients to support body maintenance, reproduction, lactation, and growth. The nutritional needs of beef cattle
More informationThe digestion system and nutrient requirements
Principles of nutrition 1 TechNote 1 The digestion system and nutrient requirements IN THIS TECHNOTE 1.1 Functions of the ruminant digestive system 1.2 Requirements of the dairy cow 1.3 Further reading
More informationThe Effect of Maturity and Frost Killing of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration
The Effect of Maturity and Frost Killing of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration A. S. Leaflet R1546 M. A. Karsli, graduate research assistant, and J. R. Russell, professor
More informationReducing the reliance on purchased protein. Improving the value of home grown proteins
Reducing the reliance on purchased protein Improving the value of home grown proteins Liam A. Sinclair Harper Adams University, Edgmond, Shropshire, UK Apr-06 Apr-07 Apr-08 Apr-09 Apr-10 Apr-11 Apr-12
More informationAll nutrients fall into one of; proteins, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals
Essential nutrients; - must be supplied to an animal because the animal cannot synthesise them - needed to satisfy the requirements of its cells * if the amount of essential nutrients supplied is insufficient
More informationFEEDING DAIRY COWS 3. FORAGE PARTICLE SIZE AND EFFECTIVE FIBRE
FEEDING DAIRY COWS 3. FORAGE PARTICLE SIZE AND EFFECTIVE FIBRE A.B. Rodríguez 1 2, P. Llorente 3, S. Andrés 1, F.J. Giráldez 1 1 Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña, CSIC ULE 2 Pania Animal S.L. 3 INATEGA
More informationTHE COMPARATIVE COMPOSITION & DIGESTIBILITY OF GREEN CORN AND ENSILAGE. - BY - Linklater.
THE COMPARATIVE COMPOSITION & DIGESTIBILITY OF GREEN CORN AND ENSILAGE. - BY - Linklater. Department of Chemistry 1000 In countries where the climate and of or conditions are suitable for its maturing
More informationDIGESTIBILITY AND CRUDE PROTEIN CHANGES IN TEN MATURING PASTURE SPECIES
DIGESTIBILITY AND CRUDE PROTEIN CHANGES IN TEN MATURING PASTURE SPECIES J. C. RADCLIFFE* and M. J. COCHRANE* Summary Pure stands of Festuca arundinacea, Phalaris tuberosa, Bromus mollis, Lolium rigidum,
More informationA Level Biology B (Advancing Biology) H422/03 Practical skills in biology Sample Question Paper SPECIMEN
A Level Biology B (Advancing Biology) H422/03 Practical skills in biology Sample Question Paper Date Morning/Afternoon Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes You may use: a scientific calculator First name Last
More informationIn vitro rumen methane output of forb species sampled in spring and summer
In vitro rumen methane output of forb species sampled in spring and summer Peter J. Purcell 1,2, Tommy M. Boland 2, Martin O Brien 1 and Pádraig O Kiely 1* 1 Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation
More informationN-Alkanes: A technique to measure herbage intake in dairy cows
N-Alkanes: A technique to measure herbage intake in dairy cows Mary McEvoy Grassland Science Research Dept., Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Ireland Background Herbage intake
More informationQUALITY GRASS MIXTURES
QUALITY GRASS MIXTURES CIRCLE LEYS THE LEADERS IN THE FIELD Nickerson, based at Rothwell in Lincolnshire, have been dedicated to supplying the very best seed technology and genetic improvement from the
More information186 Trop Anim Prod :3
186 Trop Anim Prod 1977 3:3 CASSAVA OR SWEET POTATO FORAGE AS COMBINED SOURCES OF PROTEIN AND ROUGHAGE IN MOLASSES BASED DIETS: EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTATION WITH SOYBEAN MEAL 1 D Ffoulkes and T R Preston
More informationMaking Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay
A3325 Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay Dan Undersander, W. Terry Howard, and Randy Shaver Forage and grain samples differ in their chemical composition
More informationH M Ferreiro, T R Preston and F Herrera. Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, University of Yucatan, Apartado 116D, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
Trop Anim Prod 977 4: 73 SISAL BY-PRODUCTS AS CATTLE FEED: EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTING ENSILED PULP WITH RICE POLISHINGS AND RAMON (BROSIMUM ALICASTRUM) ON GROWTH RATE, DIGESTIBILITY AND GLUCOSE ENTRY RATE
More informationThe Ruminant Animal. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Oklahoma State University
The Ruminant Animal Chapter 10 Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Oklahoma State University Arable Land Globally: 1/32 of the land mass is suitable for cultivation. United States: United States: Today
More informationEvaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator
College of Agricultural Sciences Cooperative Extension Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator Jud Heinrichs Department of Dairy and Animal Science The
More information4-H Premier Exhibitor
4-H Premier Exhibitor What is the single biggest expense to livestock producers? Nutrients something that nourishes an animal Concentrate Feed which is high in energy or protein and dlow in fiber fb &
More information172 Trop Anim Prod :2
7 Trop Anim Prod 979 4: AMMONIA TREATED WHEAT STRAW AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR MAIZE SILAGE FOR GROWING LAMBS R Tejada, Beatriz Murillo and M T Cabezas University San Carlos, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria
More informationEstimation of Total Tract Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients in Three Annual Winter Forages Using Two Different Digestibility Markers
Estimation of Total Tract Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients in Three Annual Winter Forages Using Two Different Digestibility Markers D. Henry, C. Njombwa, F. Ciriaco, V. Mercadante, G. Lamb, and N. DiLorenzo
More informationDigestion of the Bison
Digestion of the Bison Roll Call: Because the stomachs of the ruminant and monogastric animals are so different, their diets also vary. Let's compare the diets. Tell me what foods each of these animals
More informationAssessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report.
Assessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report. Silage analysis is a useful if not essential tool when diets are to be formulated for ruminant livestock. All farmers should have their silage analysed in
More informationBy: Dr. Patrick Davis, University of Missouri Extension County Livestock Specialist Jeff Yearington, Lincoln University Farm Outreach Worker West
By: Dr. Patrick Davis, University of Missouri Extension County Livestock Specialist Jeff Yearington, Lincoln University Farm Outreach Worker West Central Region Goat Nutrition Forage Quality Feeding Strategies
More informationResponse of Ruminants to Protein Supplementation is Affected by Type of Low-quality Forage 1
Oregon State University BEEF0028 Beef Research Report Beef Cattle Sciences Response of Ruminants to Protein Supplementation is Affected by Type of Low-quality Forage 1 David W. Bohnert 2, Timothy DelCurto
More informationIMPACT OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEEDING DENSITIES ON WEED EMERGENCE, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. S.S. SEEFELDT and M.L. ARMSTRONG
38 IMPACT OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEEDING DENSITIES ON WEED EMERGENCE, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT S.S. SEEFELDT and M.L. ARMSTRONG AgResearch, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton ABSTRACT Research
More informationAbstract. Al-marashdeh et al. Time of maize silage supplementation. O Al-marashdeh* a, SL Greenwood b, S Hodge a and GR Edwards a
140 The effects of feeding maize silage at different times prior to a herbage meal on dry matter intake, milksolids production and nitrogen excretion in late-lactation dairy cows O Al-marashdeh* a, SL
More informationGrange Beef Research Centre
ENVIRONMENT AND ALTERNATIVE FORAGE USE The impact of incubation duration on methanogenesis of four diets assessed using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC) This experiment was designed to assess the
More informationThe efficiency of utilization of energy and nitrogen in young sambar (Cervus unicolor) and red deer
Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (1998), 130, 193 198. 1998 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom 193 The efficiency of utilization of energy and nitrogen in young sambar (Cervus
More informationRight Quality vs High Quality Forages
Forage In Dairy Cow Rations Right Quality vs High Quality Forages Forage 50-60% NonForage 40-50% Mary Beth Hall USDA Agricultural Research Service VSFA 2/18/2016 14 herds, 28,600 36,960 kg RHA What cows
More informationRumenology 101. Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences, UF-IFAS
Rumenology 101 Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences, UF-IFAS Ruminants are cool. They have a diverse body size from the small mouse deer that weighs 4 to 11 lbs and stands 14 inches tall to the giraffe
More informationCOW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?
COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK Ken Olson Extension Beef Specialist How do we get the best bang for the buck? 2 aspects: Biology: Use the right feeds to provide the right nutrients
More informationForages, fat, fitness and flavour
Forages, fat, fitness and flavour Richard Dewhurst and Nigel Scollan Fatty acids in grasses Fatty acids in grass silage Fatty acids and beef Effects of fatty acids on meat appearance and flavour Richard
More informationGut Fill Revisited. Lawrence R. Jones 1 and Joanne Siciliano-Jones 2 1. American Farm Products, Inc. 2. FARME Institute, Inc. Introduction.
113 Gut Fill Revisited Lawrence R. Jones 1 and Joanne Siciliano-Jones 2 1 American Farm Products, Inc. 2 FARME Institute, Inc. Summary Generally, a dairy cow s daily dry matter intake (DMI) will be under
More informationIN SACCO DEGRADABILITY OF WHEAT STRAW TREATED WITH UREA AND FIBROLYTIC ENZYMES
Indian J. Anim. Res., 48 (1) : 21-26, 2014 DOI- 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.1.005 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION CENTRE www.arccjournals.com IN SACCO DEGRADABILITY OF WHEAT STRAW TREATED WITH UREA AND
More informationCopyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere
More informationUnderstanding Forage Intake in Range Animals
L-5152 1-99 Understanding Forage Intake in Range Animals Robert K. Lyons, Rick Machen, and T.D.A. Forbes* Forage quality influences the performance of range livestock and wildlife, and it is often assumed
More informationThe Rumen Ciliate Epidinium in Primary Degradation of
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 1979, p. 1217-1223 0099-2240/79/06-1217/07$02.00/0 Vol. 37, No. 6 The Rumen Ciliate Epidinium in Primary Degradation of Plant Tissues T. BAUCHOP Applied Biochemistry
More informationDefining Forage Quality 1
SS-AGR-322 1 Adegbola T. Adesogan, Joao Vendramini, Lynn Sollenberger, and Yoana Newman 2 Forages are a major asset of any livestock operation and the foundation of most rations in a forage-based livestock
More informationChapter 20 Feed Preparation and Processing
Chapter 20 Feed Preparation and Processing GRAIN PROCESSING METHODS COLD PROCESSING METHODS Rollermill Grinding Rollermills act on grain by compressing it between two smooth or corrugated rollers that
More informationHow to use the card system. OBSALIM: A set of cards to make a diagnosis of the nutrition of goats English
How to use the card system OBSALIM: A set of cards to make a diagnosis of the nutrition of goats. 2011 English The objective of the OBSALIM diagnosis 3 How to make the OBSALIM diagnosis 3 Four steps 4
More informationIntake, retention time in the rumen and microbial protein production of Bos indicus steersconsuming grasses varying in crude protein content
Animal Production Science, 2010, 50, 444 448 CSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/an Intake, retention time in the rumen and microbial protein production of Bos indicus steersconsuming grasses
More information104 Trop Anim Prod :2
04 Trop Anim Prod 977 : SUGAR CANE FOR BEEF PRODUCTION: DERINDED SUGAR CANE AND CHOPPED CANE COMPARED WITH HAY AND CITRUS PULP F M Dixon Bodles Agricultural Station Old Harbour, Jamaica In two separate
More informationEffective Practices In Sheep Production Series
Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series Understanding Feed Test Analysis Terms The key to accurate feed tests is correct sampling of your forages and grains. Equally important, is understanding
More informationDairyCo-BGS Demo Farms: Demonstrating Research in Practice. Farm visit. Chynoweth Farm Partners. 5 November
DairyCo-BGS Demo Farms: Demonstrating Research in Practice Farm visit Chynoweth Farm Partners Mr Simon, James and Rob Foote Chynoweth Farm St Allen Truro TR4 9DG 5 November 2014 10.30 14.00 DairyCo-BGS
More informationSMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT
SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT The attributes of small grain cereal forages that increase their versatility and value also can complicate
More informationThe use of polyethylene glycol as a marker for measuring rumen water volume and the rate of flow of water from the rumen of grazing sheep
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research ISSN: 0028-8233 (Print) 1175-8775 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnza20 The use of polyethylene glycol as a marker for measuring
More information257 Quality and quantity of chicory, lucerne and red clover production under irrigation Abstract Keywords:
257 Quality and quantity of chicory, lucerne and red clover production under irrigation H.E. BROWN and D.J. MOOT Agriculture and Life Sciences Division, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University. moot@lincoln.ac.nz
More informationGOAT NUTRITION; SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES TO SHEEP NUTRITION
Goat Notes GOAT NUTRITION; SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES TO SHEEP NUTRITION Professor Ronald A Leng AO B.Sc., Ph.D., D.Rur.Sc., FASAP Goats come in all shapes and sizes from the smallest, which is the Black
More informationDigestive Systems of Livestock. A basic Look. To understand the basic anatomy of livestock digestive systems.
Digestive Systems of Livestock A basic Look Goal: To understand the basic anatomy of livestock digestive systems. Objectives: To understand methods of prehension. To understand the different types of digestive
More informationUnit 2: Animals on the land
GCSE Animal Nutrition Unit 2: Animals on the land For first teaching from September 2013 For first award in Summer 2015 Animal Nutrition Learning Outcomes At the end of this unit students should be able
More information{A number of conditions
Need to Know How to adjust sheep feed requirements Things you need to know about livestock production practices. LINK The information on this Need to Know card is from Virtual Apprentice 2040: Livestock1.
More informationSheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis
Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis Table of Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Introduction Step 1. Choose the Feeds to be Tested Step 2. Collect the Feed Sample Step 3. Submit the Feed Samples Step
More informationINTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS
INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Ph.D. Department of Animal and Food Sciences University of Kentucky Forages are the foundation for building diets for beef and dairy cattle,
More informationDigestion of the Bison
Digestion of the Bison Roll Call: Name an animal. Is this animal ruminant or monogastric? Now, name as many ruminant and monogastric animals as you can. Ruminant Monogastric Because your diet is so different
More informationComparison of herbage yield, nutritive value and ensilability traits of three ryegrass species evaluated for the Irish Recommended List
Research Article DOI: 10.1515/ijafr-2015-0003 IJAFR 54(1) 2015 31 40 Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research Comparison of herbage yield, nutritive value and ensilability traits of three ryegrass
More informationProcessing, Mixing, and Particle Size Reduction of Forages for Dairy Cattle 1
Processing, Mixing, and Particle Size Reduction of Forages for Dairy Cattle 1 A. J. Heinrichs,*,2, D. R. Buckmaster, and B. P. Lammers* *Departments of Dairy and Animal Science and Agricultural and Biological
More informationTHE BANANA PLANT AS CATTLE FEED: DIGESTIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY INTAKE OF MIXTURES OF SUGAR CANE AND BANANA FORAGE 1. D Ffoulkes and T R Preston 2
Trop Anim Prod 1977 3:2 125 THE BANANA PLANT AS CATTLE FEED: DIGESTIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY INTAKE OF MIXTURES OF SUGAR CANE AND BANANA FORAGE 1 D Ffoulkes and T R Preston 2 CDIPCA, CEAGANA, Santo Domingo,
More informationDevelopment of Livestock Feeding Systems For Grain Screenings
A Co-operative Program Between ALBERTA FARM MACHINERY RESEARCH CENTRE PRAIRIE AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY INSTITUTE Research Update Printed: September, 2000 ISSN 1188-4770, Group 5(k) Humboldt, SK 748 Development
More informationC hewing and ruminating with
The Professional Animal Scientist TBC (TBC): 5 TBC American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists ARPAS006 C hewing and ruminating with various forage qualities in nonlactating dairy cows M. Fustini,*
More informationEvaluation of manure can provide information on rumen function and digestion of the ration. By understanding the factors that cause changes in
Evaluation of manure can provide information on rumen function and digestion of the ration. By understanding the factors that cause changes in appearance, consistency and particle size, we can interpret
More informationGrass to Glass Amazing Dairy Cows
Purpose: Students learn how the complex digestive system of dairy cows allows these animals to eat grass and other forages to produce milk for humans to drink. Time: 60 min Level: 3-6 Materials: Diagram
More informationSeed Quality & Treatment
Ley Mixtures 2017 Seed Quality & Treatment Purity HUBBARDS QUALITY = Higher purity and less weed seeds Pure Seed 98% Inert Matter 2% Weed Species Trace EU QUALITY = More inert matter and weed seeds Pure
More informationHIGHER FORAGE DIETS: DYNAMICS OF PASSAGE, DIGESTION, AND COW PRODUCTIVE RESPONSES
HIGHER FORAGE DIETS: DYNAMICS OF PASSAGE, DIGESTION, AND COW PRODUCTIVE RESPONSES R. J. Grant and K. W. Cotanch William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY BACKGROUND: FIBER WORKING GROUP
More informationTHE EFFECT OF BROWSE SPECIES WHEN FED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO LOW QUALITY NATIVE GRASS HAY ON ANIMAL PERFORMANCE. Abstract
ID # 19-18 THE EFFECT OF BROWSE SPECIES WHEN FED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO LOW QUALITY NATIVE GRASS HAY ON ANIMAL PERFORMANCE A. Elgersma 2, J.F. Oerlemans 1,2 and D.B. Coates 1 1 CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Private
More informationA simplified method for lignin measurement in a range of forage species
9 A simplified method for lignin measurement in a range of forage species A.V. CHAVES,, G.C. WAGHORN and M.H. TAVENDALE AgResearch Grasslands, Private Bag 008, Palmerston North Massey University, Palmerston
More informationCreating a System for Meeting the Fiber Requirements of Dairy Cows
Creating a System for Meeting the Fiber Requirements of Dairy Cows D. R. MERTENS US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Madison, WI 53706 ABSTRACT Current NRC recommendations
More informationFibre is complicated! NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports NDF. Review. NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin
Fibre is complicated! Understanding andf, andfom, NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports T.P. Tylutki PhD Dpl ACAS CEO AMTS LLC Groton NY USA NDF NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin
More informationIN SITU DEGRADABILITY OF HAND HARVESTED OR EXTRUSA SAMPLES OF. TANZANIA GRASS (PANICUM MAXIMUM, Jacq.) Kronka 2. Abstract
ID # 09-43 IN SITU DEGRADABILITY OF HAND HARVESTED OR EXTRUSA SAMPLES OF TANZANIA GRASS (PANICUM MAXIMUM, Jacq.) T. T. Berchielli 2, A.K. D. Salman 1,3, R. N. Silveira 3, W. V. B. Soares 3, J. R. Nogueira
More informationAlberta 4-H Bison Project Member Level One. Feeds for Bison
Feeds for Bison Roll Call: Name a feed ingredient that is used in a ration. Rations and diets Diet A diet is the mixture or combination of feeds that provide the nutrient requirements. The diet you feed
More informationAnimal Digestion and Nutrition. Objective 7.02: Understand the digestive process
Animal Digestion and Nutrition Objective 7.02: Understand the digestive process RUMINANTS Ruminant Animals Animals with complex digestive systems Capable of digesting material with a high fiber concentration
More informationWhy is forage digestibility important?
Outline 1. How fiber digestibility is assessed in the lab 2. Factors affecting forage quality 3. How lactating dairy cows respond to changes in fiber digestibility Outline 1. How fiber digestibility is
More informationINTAKE AND GROWTH OF STEERS OFFERED DIFFERENT ALLOWANCES OF AUTUMN GRASS AND CONCENTRATES. E.G. O Riordan, P. French, P. O Kiely and A.P.
ID # 19-16 INTAKE AND GROWTH OF STEERS OFFERED DIFFERENT ALLOWANCES OF AUTUMN GRASS AND CONCENTRATES. E.G. O Riordan, P. French, P. O Kiely and A.P. Moloney Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co.
More informationFermentation and Digestion of Formaldehyde Treated Ensiled High Moisture Corn Grain
which has been implicated with feed intake problems. Thus until more is known about intake and efficiency of utilization, definite recommendations as to moisture level and particle size can not be made.
More informationGRASS VS. LEGUME FORAGES FOR DAIRY CATTLE
GRASS VS. LEGUME FORAGES FOR DAIRY CATTLE J. Paulson 1, H. Jung 2,3, M. Raeth-Knight 3 and J. Linn 3 1 University of Minnesota Extension 2 USDA-ARS 3 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota
More informationDepartment of Animal Science; University of Nebraska; Lincoln, NE
BASICS OF RUMINANT ANIMAL NUTRITION Pablo L. Loza, MS and Jess L. Miner, PhD* Department of Animal Science; University of Nebraska; Lincoln, NE 68583-0908 Introduction Cellulose is the main constituent
More informationPotash Development Association FERTILISERS AND HYPOMAGNESAEMIA: AN HISTORIC EXAGGERATION?
Potash Development Association FERTILISERS AND HYPOMAGNESAEMIA: AN HISTORIC EXAGGERATION? by Professor Gordon Hemingway Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden Glasgow G61 1QH, UK Potash Development
More informationFORAGE = BEEF (1) The researchers compared three diets for cows on dormant winter range: 1. Control (no supplement) 2. Corn Gluten Feed. 3.
FORAGE = BEEF (1) A cow s job is to convert forage into beef. The more forage a cow harvests, the more and bigger calves she weans. Supplement can help cows or really the microbes in their rumen - harvest
More informationProceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science. Vol. 63, 2012
#737 Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science Vol. 63, 2012 PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTATION OF LOW-QUALITY FORAGE: EFFECTS OF AMOUNT AND FREQUENCY ON INTAKE AND NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY BY
More informationSpoiled silage 1. Full citation: WILKINSON, J.M Spoiled silage. Norgrass, No. 52, pp
Spoiled silage 1 Spoiled silage in the diet of livestock poses a health hazard and reduces animal performance. Professor Mike Wilkinson of Nottingham University reviews research findings. Introduction
More informationWhy Graze? Supplementing Lactating Cows Requires Different Thinking. Grazing when grazing wasn t cool!! WHY? Good Pasture WVU Circular 379 Early 50s
Supplementing Lactating Cows Requires Different Thinking Why Graze? Low cost feed source for seasonal dairy Least cost way to begin dairying Protein source for conventional dairy Carl E. Polan, Virginia
More informationEffects of Increased Inclusion of Algae Meal on Lamb Total Tract Digestibility
Animal Industry Report AS 661 ASL R3003 2015 Effects of Increased Inclusion of Algae Meal on Lamb Total Tract Digestibility Rebecca S. Stokes Iowa State University, rsstokes@iastate.edu Megan L. Van Emon
More informationThe Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration
The Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration A. S. Leaflet R1547 M. A. Karsli, graduate research assistant, and J. R. Russell, professor of animal science.
More informationMatching Forages to the Nutrient Needs of Meat Goats
Matching Forages to the Nutrient Needs of Meat Goats J. Paul Mueller, Matthew H. Poore, Jean-Marie Luginbuhl, and James T. Green, Jr. FORAGES FOR GOATS Goats offer an alternative to utilizing forage and
More informationSheep and Goat EXPO: Supplemental Feeds and Feeding
Sheep and Goat EXPO: Supplemental Feeds and Feeding Travis Whitney 8-18-17 San Angelo, TX Supplementation in West Texas What exactly do you need? Perennial, Warm-Season Plants CP P Digestion GRASS: spring
More informationMatching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test
Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test Ed Rayburn, Extension Specialist WVU Extension Service, Agriculture and Natural Resources October 2013 The conventional method for matching hay
More informationHow to Maximize Energy Content in Forage Grasses
How to Maximize Energy Content in Forage Grasses Dr. S. Ray Smith and Kelly Prince Forage Extension Specialist and Masters Student University of Kentucky Lexington, KY Raysmith1@uky.edu or (859) 257-3358
More informationAnimal Appetites. The following narrative was written by Alex, a 5th grader who raises livestock for 4-H.
Animal Appetites The following narrative was written by Alex, a 5th grader who raises livestock for 4-H. This morning I woke up early because it was my turn to feed the animals my sister and I are raising
More informationSupplement Types - Energy. ME Fixed? What is Metabolisable Energy? Feeding Supplements & Practical Ration Balancing. Dr Julian Waters 3/1/16
Key Nutritional Principles for Profitable Dairy Farming Feeding Supplements & Practical Ration Balancing 14 13 12 11 Supplement Types - Energy ME (MJ/kg DM) Dr Julian Waters Protected Fats 32-37 MJ Expeller
More information