Dr Eggimann collaborated in several industrysponsored. clinical trials since Talk ID: year old BMI 41 Transferred for septic shock

Transcription

1 Suggestions to prevent Candida infections Dr Philippe Eggimann, PD&MER Service de Médecine Intensive Adulte Anything I say can be highly biased Dr Eggimann collaborated in several industrysponsored clinical trials since DISCLOSURE Eggimann Dr Eggimann served on advisory board for and/or presented sponsored lectures for Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Roche, Weyth-Lederle, Lilly, Medex Kenta-Biotech Talk ID: year old BMI 41 Transferred for septic shock ICU acquired sepsis D-9: cholecystectomy D-2: septic shock à duodenal perforations à laparostoma Norepinephrine Mechanical ventilation HCVV Parenteral nutrition Broad spectrum AB No antifungals à fever /chills à worsening hypotension Could it be a candidiasis? ICU: the world of infection 1,265 worldwide ICU 14,414 patients 51% with infection ( ) Epidemiology of severe Candida infections 843 Candida infections 1,265 worldwide ICU 14,414 patients 51% with infection ( ) 17% (11%-18.5%) EPIC II study Vincent JL, et al. JAMA. 2009;302: EPIC II study Vincent JL, et al. JAMA. 2009;302:

2 Epidemiology of severe Candida infections 843 Candida infections worldwide ICU patients 51% with infection ( ) Candidemia: 61 EPIC II study Kett D et al. CCM 2011; 39: Bitar D, et al. Em Infect Dis 2014; 20: Outcome of candidemia Outcome of candidemia Crude mortality 30% to 60% 2507 candidemia in Paris aera( ) Crude mortality 30% to 60% 1206 candidemia in ICU patients ( ) ICU All patients Candida spp Candida spp The French Mycosis Study Group Lortholary O et al. ICM 2014; 40: The French Mycosis Study Group Lortholary O et al. ICM 2014; 40: Outcome of candidemia Crude mortality 30% to 60% Attributable mortality 25% to 40% Attributable Candida spp Arendrup MC, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:

3 Non candidemic invasive candidiasis Invasive Non candidemic candidiasis invasive candidiasis Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56: Adhesion colonization Exogenous Adhesion colonization Exogenous Pathology immunosuppression prematurity / bruns neutropenia / ileus Endogenous Pathology immunosuppression prematurity / bruns neutropenia / ileus Endogenous Saliva Stomach Ileon Teeth Jejunum Colon Knoke M. Mycoses. 1999;42(S1):30-4. León C, et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28: Adhesion colonization Exogenous Adhesion colonization Exogenous Pathology immunosuppression prematurity / bruns neutropenia / ileus Endogenous Pathology immunosuppression prematurity / bruns neutropenia / ileus Endogenous Physical barrier Immune barrier Chemical barrier Microbial barrier Invasion Risk factors Odds Ratio Colonization by Candida Antibiotics Central venous catheter ICU stay Neutropenia Previous surgery Renal failure Yan L, et al. Microbiol Res. 2013;168(7): Candidemia 5-10/10,000 admissions Eggimann P, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:

4 Pathophysiology of invasive candidiasis Pathophysiology of invasive candidiasis Candidemia Progressive colonization 25 may 21 may 16 may 12 may 12 may 27 may Candidemia +++ Non candidemic IC 0 to + Candidemia +++ Non candidemic IC + to ++ Candidemia ++ Non candidemic IC 0 to + Candidemia 0 to + Non candidemic IC +++ Pittet D, et al. Am J Med. 1991;91:256S-263S. Pittet D, et al. Ann Surg. 1994;220: Nucci M, Anaissie E. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33: Eggimann P, Pittet D. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40: Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university Guidelines? Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university Guidelines? Which drug? What delay? Catheter removal? 4

5 Treatment of documented candidiasis Treatment of documented candidiasis Amphotericin B binding to ergosterol of outmembrane loss of permeability Very broad spectrum 50-90% side effects 20-40% for L-forms Echinocandins inhibition of cell wall Synthesis (fungicidal) Very broad spectrum 10-15% side effects Parenteral use only Failure rates in randomized adult studies 1994 to % 40% 30% Very broad spectrum 30-50% side effects Potential myelotoxicity 5-flucytosine inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis (Very) broad spectrum 10-20% side effects Many interractions Available for oral use Azoles inhibition (Cy P450) of ergosterol synthesis 20% 10% 0% ampho B L - ampho B ampho B + fluco flu conazole vori conazole caspo fungin mica fugin Rex NEJM 1994; Phillips CIF 1997; Mora-Duarte NEJM 02; Rex CID 03; Kullberg Lancet 05; Pappas CID 07; Kuse Lancet 07; Reboli NEJM 07 anidula fungin Treatment of documented candidiasis Treatment of documented candidiasis Pooled data from 7 randomized adult studies 1994 to 2007 IDSA Guidelines Pappas PG, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48: Andes DR, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54: Treatment of documented candidiasis Treatment of documented candidiasis 5

6 Treatment of documented candidiasis Treatment of documented candidiasis ESCMID Guidelines Cornely OA, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18: ESCMID Guidelines Cornely OA, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18: Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Which drug? What delay? Catheter removal? Candida-university Treatment of documented candidiasis Impact of delayed antifungal treatment Early treatment should be empirical!!! Nolla-Salas J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23: Morrell M, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: Garey KW, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43: Hsu DI, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65: Candidemia: catheter removal? Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university 2 pooled studies: 1109 candidemia mortality Which drug? What delay? Catheter removal? Horn DL, et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:

7 Candidemia: catheter removal? 2 pooled studies: 842 candidemia Candidemia: catheter removal? Swiss fungal network : 566 candidemia hospital mortality 232 (41%) attributable mortality 45 ( 8%) OR for death CVC retained : 4.07 ( ) antifungals> 72 h : 1.41 ( ) Nucci M, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;51: Erard V, et al. 50th ICAAC 2010 Candidemia: catheter removal? Candidemia: catheter removal? 7 pooled studies: 1915 candidemia CVC retained CVC removed * * *P>0.01 * Andes DR, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54: ESCMID Guidelines Cornely OA, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18: Candidemia: catheter removal? Please, remove this catheter! Treatment: 770 clinical studies 20 editorials 9 meta-analyses Candida-university Which drug? What delay? Catheter removal? 7

8 Outcome of candidemia Antifungals in critically ill patients + Puig-Asensio M et al. Crit Care Med. 2014;42: Microbiological evidence Preemptive Prophylaxis Targeted Empirical Biomarkers Unlikely Possible Probable Proven Likelihood of disease Eggimann, Bille, Marchetti, Annals of Intensive Care 2011, 1:37 Invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients 90 % Pelz et al. Surg Infect Petri et al. Intensive Care Med Garbino et al. Intensive Care Med Nola et al. ICAAC Eggimann et al. Crit Care Med Colonized patients Infected patients 40%-80% colonized 1%-10% infected Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? 40%-80% colonized 1%-10% infected? Prophylaxis?? Empirical treatment? Guidelines Preemptive treatment Prophylaxis BSAC CID 1994 yes Edwards CID 1997 data Vincent ICM 1998 SDD? Rex CID 2000 yes, but Buchner EJCMID 2002 yes at risk patients Denning Lancet ID 2003 Pappas CID 2004 carfully selected pts SFAR/SPILF/SRLF 2004 yes, but indication ESCMID 2014 yes, but carfully selected pts IDSA CID 2009/2015 yes, but carfully selected 8

9 Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? colonized patient = infected patient 3 to 5 days Montravers P, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39: Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? 1.5% 2.5% 5.1% Very low risk Experimented clinicians failed to identify ICU patients susceptible to benefit from empirical antifungal treatment 1.9% Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Invasive candidiasis: it takes 7 to 14 days Continuous exposure to risk factors Empirical antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Invasive candidiasis: it takes 7 to 14 days Continuous exposure to risk factors Empiric antifungal treatment? Empiric antifungal treatment? Empiric antifungal treatment? Empiric antifungal treatment? Empiric antifungal treatment? Montravers P, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39: Progressive colonization Pittet D, et al. Am J Med. 1991;91:256S-263S. Pittet D, et al. Ann Surg. 1994;220: Nucci M, Anaissie E. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33: Empiric antifungal treatment? Montravers P, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39: Progressive colonization Pittet D, et al. Am J Med. 1991;91:256S-263S. Pittet D, et al. Ann Surg. 1994;220: Nucci M, Anaissie E. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:

10 Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules N sites /N sites screened -Surgery on ICU admission 4th day of ICU stay: 2x weekly -Total parenteral nutrition Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. >0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Severe sepsis + 1 one of: -Candida colonization -TPN (day 1-3) >2.5 points -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) Start empiric antifungal treatment Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1: surgical ICU patients followed over 6 months 29 colonized by Candida spp ( 3 sites nonvascular) Corrected Colonization index 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 Candida colonization index Documented candidia infection (n=11) Threshold reached 5-6 days before infection Does it work? Just colonized (n=18) days Pittet D, et al. Ann Surg. 1994;220: Candida colonization index Candida colonization index mixed ICU patients, ventilated for >4 days randomized to fluconazole 100 mg/d or placebo Colonization index Days P<0.05 Placebo n= candidiasis Fluconazole n=103 1 candidiasis Garbino J, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28: Assessment of - the risk of invasive candidiasis: 7 studies - the value of candiduria: 5 studies - the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis: 6 studies To guide empirical antifungal treatment: 4 studies To compare the accuracy of other markers: - Candida score 4 studies - Mannans/antimannans 2 studies - CAGTA 1 study - Betaglucans 2 studies Negative predictive value >> positive predictive value 1985 patients 714 patients 1582 patients Despite its limited bedside practicality and before confirmation of potentially more accurate predictors, such as specific biomarkers, the CI remains an important way to characterize the dynamics of colonization, which increases early in patients who develop invasive candidiasis. Eggimann P, Pittet D. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40: Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empirical antifungal Candida tt in score critically ill patients? Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules N sites /N sites screened -Surgery on ICU admission 2x weekly -Total parenteral nutrition > 0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points NPV>PPV Start empiric antifungal treatment 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. Candida score > 2.5 à 7.75 (CI ) time to develop candidiasis León C, et al. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:

11 Candida score Empirical antifungal tt in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? 1007 ICU patients (36 units) staying >7 days 58 candidiasis (5.8%) Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules High negative predictive value N sites /N sites screened 2x weekly > 0.5 or 0.4 corrected NPV>PPV -Surgery on ICU admission -Total parenteral nutrition -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points NPV>PPV 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) Start empiric antifungal treatment Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% León C, et al. Crit Care Med. 2009;37: Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. Candida predictive rules High sentivity à High specificityà High % of patients treated with AF High % of patients missed by the rules Eggimann P, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16: Candida predictive rules 40%-80% colonized 1%-20% infected Impossible to implement at the bedside MSG-04 (MK 0991 Protocol 067) caspofungin in high-risk patients INTENSE study micafungin in surgical patients Knitsch W et al. CID 2015? Prophylaxis?? Empirical treatment? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules N sites /N sites screened 2x weekly > 0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Surgery on ICU admission -Total parenteral nutrition -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) N sites /N sites screened 2x weekly > 0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Surgery on ICU admission -Total parenteral nutrition -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) NPV>PPV Start empiric antifungal treatment NPV>PPV Start empiric antifungal treatment Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. 11

12 Biomarkers of candidiasis in critically ill patients Biomarkers of candidiasis in critically ill patients 95 roman ICU patients developping sepsis >5th day of stay (diag : medical 61; surgical: 12 trauma:22) Posteraro B, et al. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R249. à 16 fungal infections à 14 invasive candidiasis à : 13 candidemia Tissot F, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188: Posteraro B, et al. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R249. Biomarkers of candidiasis in critically ill patients 89 swiss ICU patients at very high risk of candidiasis (recurrent GI tract perforation / necrotizing pancreatitis) Biomarkers of candidiasis in critically ill patients 89 swiss ICU patients at very high risk of candidiasis (recurrent GI tract perforation / necrotizing pancreatitis) 29 invasive candidiasis Tissot F, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188: Tissot F, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188: Beta-glucan in critically ill patients 89 Swiss ICU patients at very high risk of candidiasis (recurrent GI tract perforation / necrotizing pancreatitis) The near future Tissot F, et al. ICAAC

13 A simplified approach 40%-80% colonized 1%-20% infected 1) Clinical scores à Exclude low risk patients Pratically 2) Biomarkers (betaglucan) à Start antifungals empirically? Prophylaxis?? Empirical treatment? Eggimann P, Pittet D. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40: Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules Colonization index Candida score Predictive rules N sites /N sites screened 2x weekly >0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Surgery on ICU admission -Total parenteral nutrition -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) N sites /N sites screened 2x weekly >0.5 or 0.4 corrected -Surgery on ICU admission -Total parenteral nutrition -Severe sepsis -Candida colonization >2.5 points 4th day of ICU stay: Sepsis + CVC + Mec.Vent. + 1 one of: -TPN (day 1-3) -Dialysis (day 1-3) -Major surgery (within 7days) -Pancreatitis (within 7days) Low Low -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) High High -Immunosup. (within 7days) or steroids (within 7days) Do not Start start empirical antifungal treatment treatment CONSIDER empiric antifungal treatment Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Candidiasis captured: 85-90% Patients treated: 15-20% Candidiasis captured : 75-85% Candidiasis captured: 60-75% Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. Eggimann P, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:37. Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? 13

14 Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? Empiric antifungal tx in critically ill patients? To summarize Invasive candidiasis in ICU patients Thank you for your attention Do not wait until candidemia and for the invitation 14

15 15