Reference methods for assessing rumen degradation characteristics of nutreints
|
|
- Neil McCormick
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Feed evaluation for dairy cows Reference methods for assessing rumen degradation characteristics of nutreints Peter Lund, Maria Chrenková & Martin Weisbjerg Department of Animal Science, AU-Foulum, Aarhus University, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark & Animal Production Research Centre Nitra Hlohovská 2, Lužianky, Slovak Republic Innovative and practical management approaches to reduce nitrogen excretion by ruminants
2 Outline New requirements for feed evaluation data Protein NDF Starch Conclusion
3 Classic feed evaluation The cow is seen as a black box Focus on total tract digestibility Feed values are additive A ration s value can be predicted from table values for components
4 Feed evaluation trends Change from classic systems to models with a more mechanistic approach to describe truly digested nutrients 1992 Cornell Net Energy and Protein System (Russel et al., 1992) 2005 NORFOR (Volden, 2011)
5 New feed evaluation systems Have skipped: Digestible Weende nutrients as basis Additivity But require for several nutrients: Potential digestibility Fractional rate of degradation To model rumen digestion
6 Kinetics in the rumen 1. order kinetics!! Rumen pool k p = 1/MRT k d k d = Fractional rate of degradation (%/h) k p = Fractional rate of passage (%/h) Digestibility = k d /(k d +k p )
7 Digestibility (%) Kinetics helps us understand real life What happens with digestibility of carbohydrates when feed intake is increased? Digestibility (%) kd = 3 %/h kd = 25 %/h kd = 120 %/h Fractional passage rate (k p, %/h)
8 K d (per hour) Example: sugar+starch affects fiber digestibility in the rumen how? 0,060 0,055 0,050 0,045 0,040 1, grass silage, starch 1, grass silage, sugar 2, lucerne 2, timothy 3, grass silage 3, grass silage 3, barley whole crop silage 3, Hay 0,035 0,030 0,025 0,020 0,015 0, Kg sugar + starch per day
9 Passage rate total NDF (per ho Example: Dry matter intake up fiber digestibility down why? Dry matter intake (kg/day)
10 Associative effects - NDF Feeding level: k p Forage:concentrate ratio (constant feeding level): Substrate-preference k d ph k d (k p ) feed intake down Rumen degradable protein level: Ammonia down, k d Fatty acids: Unsaturated fatty acids, k d Medium chain fatty acids (C12 and C14), k d
11 Feed type Potential digestibility Starch content Feed type Fractional rate of degradation, kd Digestibility of NDF Fractional rate of passage, kp Feed intake
12 What is required? Main nutrients: Protein NDF Starch Degradation characteristics required: Potential degradability Fractional rate of degradation, k d Solubility (for protein) Further, fractional rate of passage as affected by animal and ration is needed, but is not an intrinsic feed characteristic
13 Degradation (%) Nedbrydningsgrad (%) How do we obtain data? Tid (t) Time (h) Nylon bag Tilley+Terry Gasproduction curve Dependent on used model Not an in vivo situation Good for table values
14 How do we obtain data in practice? Parameterisation of new models mainly based on in situ (nylon bag) or in vitro rumen fluid based methods Future feed evaluation in practise Concentrates mainly table values Forages mainly NIRs measures However, NIRs require reliable reference methods. In situ and rumen fluid based methods are not appropriate (expensive, time and resource demanding, difficult in commercial labs) Therefore laboratory methods are needed
15 Protein
16 Protein Nutritive value of crude protein (CP) in feedstuffs for ruminants Rate and extent of degradation in the rumen Intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded protein (RUP) Currently, in situ and in vivo methods are the main reference methods used in European systems (PDI, DCE/OEB, AAT/PBV) and NRC USA. The Cornel Net Carbohydrate Protein Model uses solubility protein in buffers and detergent solutions to fractionate protein in feeds into five fractions. It is chemical laboratory method and/or in vitro method.
17 The methods for determination a potential CP degradability and intestinal digestibility Ruminal degradability (rumen undegraded protein (RDP) & rumen undegraded protein (RUP)) in situ in vitro (CNCPS) Intestinal digestibility mobile bag enzymatic in vitro
18 Feed protein fractions - in situ vs. CNCPS Soluble (bags) In situ Feed Potentially degradable Insoluble Undegradable Buf. sol. NPN Sol.protein A B1 CNCPS Feed Buf. insol.-ndin B2 Buf. insol NDIN - ADIN B3 ADIN Indigestible C
19 Chrenková et al. unpublished Conclusion in situ vs. CNCPS comparisons Universal prediction of in situ RDP and RUP according to CNCPS seems problematic work in progress Preliminary results show high correlation (R 2 =0.80) between in situ parameter b (insoluble but degradable CP fraction) and CNCNS protein subfraction B 2 (% of CP) There were negative correlations between in situ parameters a and c and buffer insoluble CP (r = ** and r = **, resp.).
20 in vitro RUP digestibility (%) Chrenková et al. unpublished Comparison in vitro to mobile bag - intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded feed protein (RUP) r=0.803 for all tested feeds; r=0.846 for cereals; r=0.917 for legumes; r=0.702 oilseeds meal ; r= for maize silages and r=0.548 for lucerne silages Mobile bag RUP digestibility (%)
21 Conclusion for intestinal digestibility An in vitro method for assessing digestibility of rumen undegraded protein in the intestine has shown high correlations (r > 0.75) to in situ digestibility.
22 NDF
23 Potential digestibility or indigestibility (indf) NorFor reference for indf is 288 h in situ CNCPS use 2.4 x ADL
24 INDF-indigestible NDF NorFor standard for INDF NDF in µm Dacron bags 288 h incubation
25 INDF (g/kg DM) 160 indf vs. ADL Primary growth, 1. Harvest Primary growth, 2. Harvest Primary growth, 3. Harvest 1. Regrowth 2. Regrowth 3. Regrowth Lineær Linear (primary growth) Lineær Linear (regrowths) ADLom (g/kg DM) Krämer et al Animal Feed Sci. Technol.
26 indf (% DM) indf vs. ADL effect of forage type 25 CNCPS 20 Festulolium y = 3.53x P. ryegrass 15 y = 2.4x H. ryegrass Festulolium White clover ADL (% DM) Cocksfoot Lucerne y = 1.66x W. clover R. clover Weisbjerg et al. 2010
27 indf vs. in vitro OM indigestibility INDF (g/kg DM) Perennial ryegrass only effect of growth and harvest time Primary growth, 1. Harvest Primary growth, 2. Harvest Primary growth, 3. Harvest 1. Regrowth 2. Regrowth 3. Regrowth Ekspon. Expon. (primary growth) Lineær Linear (regrowths) IOMD (g/kg OM) Krämer et al Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 177, 40 51
28 Conclusions indf Universal prediction equations not accurate Within some feed types simple or multiple regression equations have potential for indf estimation Examples: All: indf(g/kg/dm) = ADL(g/kg DM) 0.44ADL(g/kg NDF); RMSE 35.8 Grass/clover: indf(g/kg/dm) = NDF 1.04ADL(DM) ADL(NDF); RMSE 16.3
29 Particle loss risk for particle loss during in situ incubations Late cut grass silage Area mm 2 Cumulative distribution functions of particle area in Dacron bag residues Alfalfa silage - machine-washing ( ) - 24 h in situ rumen incubation (-----) h in situ rumen incubation ( ) Vertical line is set at mm 2 particle area. Krämer et al J Dairy Sci. Area mm 2
30 Accumulated density Accumulated density Particle loss from nylon bags Cumulative distribution functions of particle area in Dacron bag residues after machine-washing ( ), 24 h in situ rumen incubation (-----), and 288 h in situ rumen incubation ( ) for forages and concentrates. Vertical line is set at mm 2 particle area. Accumulated density Accumulated density Early cut grass silage Area (mm 2 ) Corn silage Late cut grass silage Area (mm 2 ) Alfalfa silage Area (mm 2 ) Area (mm 2 ) Dried distillers grains Accumulated density Accumulated density Rapeseed meal 2 2
31 NDF rate of degradation
32 In vivo NDF digestibility in vivo NDF digestibility In vitro gas vs. in situ The in vitro gas production method was more accurate and biologically the relationship was more correct, but the in situ method was more precise Y = X (R ) Predicted NDF digestibility - in situ kd 0.4 Y = X (R ) Predicted NDF digestibility - gas kd Weisbjerg, M.R., Rinne, M. & Huhtanen, P. (2009)
33 NDF rate of degradation Biological methods (in situ, in vitro, in vitro gas) are all very resource demanding All 3 methods useful and pros and cons - however they differ in estimated degradation parameters Backwards calculation at present used in NorFor system might be the future! Beside indf, only common feed information is needed
34 Backwards calculation Information needed OM digestibility Ash concentration NDF concentration indf concentration All except indf are classical feed analysis Idea: NDS digestibility estimated using Lucas principle NDF digestibility calculated by difference Kd NDF backwards calculated assuming 2 pool rumen model
35 Estimation of k d for DNDF from in vivo NDF digestibility The theory DNDF digestibility (D) = (k d /(k d +k r ) [1 + k r /(k d + k p )] This equation can be solved according to k d k d =[-(k p + k r )+[(k p + k r ) 2 +4Dk r k p /(1 - D)] 0.5 ]/2 Necessary information and assumptions: In vivo NDF digestibility INDF concentration Mean retention time and distribution of MRT on compartment 1 and 2 Allen & Mertens (1988), Huhtanen et al. (2004)
36 Assumptions on rumen NDF passage behaviour Two compartment model, with selective retention of young material in the rumen Hypothetical example for sheep fed at maintenance level k d k d CMRT 20 h CMRT 30 h k r 0.05 h -1 k p h -1
37 NDS digestibility (%) Lucas equation. Apparent NDS digestibility plotted against NDS concentration NDS (% of feed DM) Weisbjerg et al., 2004
38 Dig. NDS (% of feed DM) Lucas equation. Apparently digested NDS in % of feed DM plotted against NDS concentration y = 1.013x R2 = 0.97 root MSE = NDS (% of feed DM) Weisbjerg et al., 2004
39 Conclusions rate of NDF degradation Biological methods (in situ, in vitro, in vitro gas) useful, but not appropriate Backwards calculation might be the future
40 Starch
41 kd in vitro (per h) Rumen starch degradability Rumen starch degradability Weisbjerg et al In vitro in situ vs in vivo - starch y = x R² = kd in situ (per h) y = 0.385x r = In situ ESD y = 1.39x r = Conclusion In vitro ESD Weak correlations between in situ and in vitro kd Effective degradability ok correlations for both methods IS k d values unrealistic, however ESD values correlated well
42 Mobile bag disappearance (g/kg) Mobile bag assessment of in vivo starch digestibility y = 0.88x + 92 R² = y = 0.58x R² = In vivo starch digestibility (g/kg) Without RP With RP Conclusion Weak correlations between in vivo and mobile bag digestibilities Taghi et al. 2012
43 Starch approach based on meta analysis on in vivo data Data base on dairy cow starch digestibility, number observations Total tract 284 Rumen 178 Small intestine 55 Hind gut 58 Multiple regression approach
44 Main results Total tract digestibility info on Source (name) significant not intake Rumen digestibility info on Source (name) and intake significant Small intestinal digestibility Source (name) significant Hind gut digestibility - positively correlated to rumen degradability and small intestinal digestibility Source (name) not important
45 Starch digestibilities (g/kg) Estimated using GLM obs. dig = source digestibility x source prop. of ration total starch Starch source Total tract Rumen Small intestine Hind gut Wheat Starch Corn starch Wheat Oat Corn silage Barley Faba beans Wheat NaOH Corn Peas Sorghum na na Barley NaOH corn silage > 60% of ration starch Green = highest, blue=high, purple=low, red =lowest
46 Rumen digestibility Only one starch pool, no soluble and no indigestible fractions Estimate kd backwards, based on estimated rumen starch digestibility (RSD) Kd= kp x (RSD/(1-RSD))
47 Calculated kd (%/h) Rate of passage 6.09 %/h calculated according to Norfor concentrate equation, using dry matter intake, live weight concentrate proportion from meta analysis Corn starch 37 Wheat 103 Oat 40 Corn silage 1 61 Barley 40 Faba beans 21 Wheat NaOH 15 Corn 8 Peas 18 Sorghum 10 Barley NaOH 12
48 Post-rumen Small intestine: Tabulated estimated digestibilitites Hind gut: Function of rumen escape (RE) proportion HGSD (g/kg) = RE (g/kg intake) Starch approach is intended to be included in the NorFor model
49 Conclusion starch Both nylon bag and in vitro methods problematic Best approach for rate of degradation backwards estimation based on in vivo digestibilities However, problematic in evaluation of new and unknown (concentrate mixtures) samples
50 General conclusions Appropriate methods are needed for practice NIRs probably not the direct solution for kd Protein: Degradation parameters (in situ) were not satisfactorily predicted using N fractions of CNCPS Large variability between and within feed Need for large data sets for proper estimations, work in progress Backwards approach for degradation rate might be future solution
51 General conclusion, cont. NDF: Kd backwards calculation based on NIRs estimated indf, DOM, NDF and ash indf NIRs, but lab reference method needed, further work required Starch: Lab methods not very promising Best solution probably table values estimated from in vivo digestibilities by backwards calculation
52 This presentation has been carried out with financial support from the Commission of the European Communities, FP7, KBB It does not necessarily reflect its view and in no way anticipates the Commission s future policy in this area. Innovative and practical management approaches to reduce nitrogen excretion by ruminants
Starch digestibility in dairy cows how do we handle starch in ration evaluation systems?
AARHUS UNIVERSITY Starch digestibility in dairy cows how do we handle starch in ration evaluation systems? Martin Riis Weisbjerg Animal Science, AU Foulum, Aarhus University, Denmark WIAS Seminar Development
More informationProtein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1
Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1 Bill Weiss Department of Animal Sciences Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691 email:
More informationNutritive Value of Feeds
Nutritive Value of Feeds Chapter 12 A working knowledge of the nutrient composition of available feeds is an integral part of a successful beef cattle operation. * The rumen fermentation process allows
More informationDAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1
Volume 2, Number 1 Focus on Forages 2015 Forages have always been an important source of nutrients for the dairy cow. Feeding high quality forages can increase dairy efficiency and help reduce the feed
More informationPrediction of CP concentration and rumen degradability by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
IBERS Prediction of CP concentration and rumen degradability by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Belanche A., G.G. Allison, C.J. Newbold, M.R. Weisbjerg and J.M. Moorby EAAP meeting, 27 August,
More informationESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT It is possible to estimate the energy value of ruminant feeds if some chemical assays of the feedstuffs, and the estimated
More informationUnderstanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology
Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology Mat Haan, Penn State Dairy Educator, Berks County Lucas Mitchell, Penn State Department of Animal Science Dairy Cattle Nutrition Workshop November 15, 2017 Interpreting
More informationCHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message
TOC INDEX CHAMPION Feed Services Ltd. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett Take Home Message The new Nutrient Requirements (NRC) of Beef Cattle published
More informationFibre is complicated! NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports NDF. Review. NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin
Fibre is complicated! Understanding andf, andfom, NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports T.P. Tylutki PhD Dpl ACAS CEO AMTS LLC Groton NY USA NDF NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin
More informationALMLM HAY QUALITY: TERMS AND DEFIN"IONS
ALMLM HAY QUALITY: TERMS AND DEFIN"IONS Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky At the 22"d Kentucky Alfalfa Conference we discussed the relationship among Alfalfa - Yield-Quality-Persistence.
More informationDietary Protein. Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho
Dietary Protein Dr. Mark McGuire Dr. Jullie Wittman AVS Department University of Idaho Some slides adapted from Dairy Nutrition & Management (ANSCI 200/492), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
More informationRuminal degradability of neutral detergent insoluble protein of selected protein sources
SHORT COMMUNICATION Ruminal degradability of neutral detergent insoluble protein of selected protein sources A. F. Mustafa 1, D. A. Christensen 2, and J. J. McKinnon 2 1 Department of Animal Science, Macdonald
More informationDr. Dan Undersander Professor of Agronomy University of Wisconsin
Dr. Dan Undersander Professor of Agronomy University of Wisconsin Hybrid South Central South Hybrid 1 Milk/t 3180 3340 Milk/a 35400 37100 NDFD 62 63 Starch 28 33 Hybrid 2 Milk/t 3250 3040 Milk/a 36000
More informationThe Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration
The Effect of Heat Treatment of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration A. S. Leaflet R1547 M. A. Karsli, graduate research assistant, and J. R. Russell, professor of animal science.
More informationThe Real Value of Canola Meal
The Real Value of Canola Meal Essi Evans Technical Advisory Services Inc Brittany Dyck Canola Council of Canada Canola Survey: 2011 Commissioned to assess awareness of canola meal by the dairy industry,
More informationMaking Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay
A3325 Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay Dan Undersander, W. Terry Howard, and Randy Shaver Forage and grain samples differ in their chemical composition
More informationCharacterization of proteins in feeds according to the CNCPS and comparison to in situ parameters
Original Paper Czech J. Anim. Sci., 59, 2014 (6): 288 295 Characterization of proteins in feeds according to the CNCPS and comparison to in situ parameters M. Chrenková 1,3, Z. Čerešňáková 1, M.R. Weisbjerg
More informationRight Quality vs High Quality Forages
Forage In Dairy Cow Rations Right Quality vs High Quality Forages Forage 50-60% NonForage 40-50% Mary Beth Hall USDA Agricultural Research Service VSFA 2/18/2016 14 herds, 28,600 36,960 kg RHA What cows
More informationFACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1
FACTORS AFFECTING MANURE EXCRETION BY DAIRY COWS 1 W. P. Weiss Department of Animal Sciences Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center The Ohio State University Manure in an inevitable byproduct
More informationINTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS
INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS Donna M. Amaral-Phillips, Ph.D. Department of Animal and Food Sciences University of Kentucky Forages are the foundation for building diets for beef and dairy cattle,
More informationMeasuring DM and NDF Digestibility and Defining Their Importance
Measuring DM and NDF Digestibility and Defining Their Importance David R. Mertens USDA-ARS US Dairy Forage Research Center Why do we measure digestibility Digestibility is important because feces represent
More informationNormand St-Pierre The Ohio State University. Copyright 2011 Normand St-Pierre, The Ohio State University
Normand St-Pierre The Ohio State University Forages are Feeds Animals do not require feeds! Feeds are packages of nutrients. The value of a feed is the sum of the values of the nutrients that it contains.
More informationGut Fill Revisited. Lawrence R. Jones 1 and Joanne Siciliano-Jones 2 1. American Farm Products, Inc. 2. FARME Institute, Inc. Introduction.
113 Gut Fill Revisited Lawrence R. Jones 1 and Joanne Siciliano-Jones 2 1 American Farm Products, Inc. 2 FARME Institute, Inc. Summary Generally, a dairy cow s daily dry matter intake (DMI) will be under
More informationProduction Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion
Feeding for 2: Understanding How to Feed the Goat and her Rumen Robert Van Saun, DVM, MS, PhD Extension Veterinarian Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion This
More informationEffect of heat treated field beans on the performance of Swedish lactating dairy cows
Effect of heat treated field beans on the performance of Swedish lactating dairy cows M. Ramin 1 A. Hojer 1, F. Fogelberg 2, M. Hetta 1 & P. Huhtanen 1 1 Department of Agricultural Research for Northern
More informationGoals. Goals. Maintenance Rations 4/25/2014. Week 4 Lecture 12. Clair Thunes, PhD
Maintenance Rations Week 4 Lecture 12 Clair Thunes, PhD Animal Science 126 Equine Nutrition Goals Understand that in reality that horses have an amino acid requirement not a CP requirement That there are
More informationWhy is forage digestibility important?
Outline 1. How fiber digestibility is assessed in the lab 2. Factors affecting forage quality 3. How lactating dairy cows respond to changes in fiber digestibility Outline 1. How fiber digestibility is
More informationEffective Practices In Sheep Production Series
Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series Understanding Feed Test Analysis Terms The key to accurate feed tests is correct sampling of your forages and grains. Equally important, is understanding
More informationIntroduction. Carbohydrate Nutrition. Microbial CHO Metabolism. Microbial CHO Metabolism. CHO Fractions. Fiber CHO (FC)
Introduction Carbohydrate Nutrition Largest component of dairy rations CHO comprise to 80% of ration DM Major source of energy for milk production One-third of milk solids is lactose 4.9 lbs. of lactose
More informationDigestibility of organic matter and NDF in concentrates accessed with enzymes methods using Daisy
Digestibility of organic matter and NDF in concentrates accessed with enzymes methods using Daisy & Martin R. Weisbjerg Department of Animal Science Science and Technology, AU-Foulum, 8830 Tjele Denmark
More informationESTIMATION OF THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF GRASS SILAGES INTRODUCTION
ESTIMATION OF THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF GRASS SILAGES P. Huhtanen 1, M. Rinne 2 and J. Nousiainen 3 1 Department of Animal Science, Cornell University 2 Animal Production Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland
More informationWHAT DO THE COWS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT NDF AND STARCH DIGESTION?
WHAT DO THE COWS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT NDF AND STARCH DIGESTION? 2014 Ohio Nutrition Workshop Rock River Laboratory Dr. John Goeser, PAS & Dipl. ACAN Animal Nutrition and R&I Director Rock River Lab, Inc.
More informationMilk Protein Area of Opportunity?
Nutrition and Milk Protein Production David R. Balbian, M.S. Thomas R. Overton, Ph.D. Cornell University and Cornell Cooperative Extension 2015 Winter Dairy Management Meetings Milk Protein Area of Opportunity?
More informationBENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY. R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS
BENCHMARKING FORAGE NUTRIENT COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY R. D. Shaver, Ph.D., PAS Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist Department of Dairy Science College of Agricultural and Life Sciences University
More informationCOW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?
COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK Ken Olson Extension Beef Specialist How do we get the best bang for the buck? 2 aspects: Biology: Use the right feeds to provide the right nutrients
More informationKnow Your Feed Terms. When you are talking nutrition and feeds with your
Revised July 2006 Agdex 400/60-2 Know Your Feed Terms When you are talking nutrition and feeds with your feed salesperson, livestock nutritionist, veterinarian or neighbour, it is important that you both
More informationNitrogen, Ammonia Emissions and the Dairy Cow
Nitrogen, Ammonia Emissions and the Dairy Cow Virginia Ishler Topics: Nitrogen from the farm to the environment Ration balancing to minimize nitrogen excretion Feeding management strategies to minimize
More informationThe Effect of Maturity and Frost Killing of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration
The Effect of Maturity and Frost Killing of Forages on Degradation Kinetics and Escape Protein Concentration A. S. Leaflet R1546 M. A. Karsli, graduate research assistant, and J. R. Russell, professor
More informationOptimizing Starch Concentrations in Dairy Rations
73 Optimizing Starch Concentrations in Dairy Rations Rick Grant 1 W. H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Abstract Currently, many nutritionists consider only the total nonfiber carbohydrate (NFC)
More informationPREDICTION OF CORRECTED IN SITU FORAGE PROTEIN DEGRADABILITY BY THE CORNELL METHOD
2011, Scienceline Publication Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research Volume 2, Issue 2: 149-154 (2012) ISSN 2228-7701 PREDICTION OF CORRECTED IN SITU FORAGE PROTEIN DEGRADABILITY BY THE CORNELL METHOD
More informationTRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT. J.E. Shirley
Dairy Day 2003 TRANSITION COW NUTRITION AND MANAGEMENT J.E. Shirley Summary Dairy cows are generally provided with a 60-day dry period. The first part of the dry period is called the far-off dry period
More informationHow Fiber Digestibility Affects Forage Quality and Milk Production
How Fiber Digestibility Affects Forage Quality and Milk Production Dr. Dave Combs Professor Dept of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison What causes performance swings in dairy diets? MOST OF
More information11/17/2017. Application of undf in Ration Formulation. Ian Shivas, Renaissance Nutrition UNDF WHAT IS IT?
Application of undf in Ration Formulation Ian Shivas, Renaissance Nutrition UNDF WHAT IS IT? 1 What is undf Some papers call it indf for indigestible NDF Mertens pushed us to call it undf for undigestible
More informationABSTRACT FORAGE SAMPLING AND TESTING ACCURACY CHOOSING A FORAGE TESTING LAB
PARAMETERS FOR GOOD QUALITY ALFALFA HAY Glenn E. Shewmaker, Mireille Chahine, and Rikki Wilson 1 ABSTRACT When alfalfa hay is tested in a laboratory analysis, several forage quality factors are considered.
More informationCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS. Rumen Escape Protein of some Dairy Feedstuffs
UC CE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Rumen Escape Protein of some Dairy Feedstuffs P.H. Robinson Cooperative Extension Specialist University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8521 Dairy
More informationThe new Nordic feed evaluation systems for dairy cows. Harald Volden, Norwegian University of Life Sciences and the NorFor project group
The new Nordic feed evaluation systems for dairy cows Harald Volden, Norwegian University of Life Sciences and the NorFor project group NorFor Plan. Based on the Norwegian AAT-model (1999-2001). A semi-mechanistic
More informationQuick Start. Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep
Quick Start Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Sheep The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) for Sheep is a feeding system derived from the CNCPS for cattle (Fox et al., 2003).
More informationACCURATELY ESTIMATING COW-LEVEL DIGESTION: WHERE DO DIGESTION RATES FIT AND WHAT DO THEY MEAN?
ACCURATELY ESTIMATING COW-LEVEL DIGESTION: WHERE DO DIGESTION RATES FIT AND WHAT DO THEY MEAN? 2014 Formuleite Conference Dr. John Goeser, PAS Animal Nutrition and R&I Director Rock River Lab, Inc. Adjunct
More informationNonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1
CIR1122 Nonstructural and Structural Carbohydrates in Dairy Cattle Rations 1 Barney Harris, Jr. 2 Carbohydrates are the largest component in the dairy ration and contribute 60 to 70% of the net energy
More informationIntroduction. Use of undf240 as a benchmarking tool. Relationships between undigested and physically effective fiber in lactating dairy cows
Relationships between undigested and physically effective fiber in lactating dairy cows R. Grant 1, W. Smith 1, M. Miller 1, K. Ishida 2, and A. Obata 2 1 William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute,
More informationRFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER
RFV VS. RFQ WHICH IS BETTER Tom Keene, University of Kentucky, Plant & Soil Science Department Peter Jeranyama, South Dakota State University, Plant Science Department Alvaro D. Garcia, South Dakota State
More information2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania
2009 Forage Production and for Pennsylvania Prepared and Presented by the Penn State Cooperative Extension (Brian Kelly, Phil Wagner, Rodger Keith, Craig Williams, Gary Hennip, and Ken Griswold) Penn State
More information- Dual Flow Continuous Culture System (Hoover, 1964) - Hohenheim System (Single Flow Continuous Culture. valerate, isobutyrate, isovalerate)
In vitro Techniques Simulation of the rumen fermentation Alternative to time consuming and expensive in vivo trials Quantification of the end products of fermentation and/or rumen dry matter digestibility
More informationFiber for Dairy Cows
Fiber for Dairy Cows R. D. Shaver, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist Department of Dairy Science College of Agricultural and Life Sciences University of Wisconsin Madison University of Wisconsin
More informationImplementing the Corn Silage Trial Results on Your Farm. Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY
Implementing the Corn Silage Trial Results on Your Farm Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY Implementing the Corn Silage Trial Results on Your Farm 2018 PENNSYLVANIA
More informationThe four stomachs of a dairy cow
The four stomachs of a dairy cow Left side view 1) Rumen 2) Reticulum 3) Omasum 4) Abomasum Reticulo-omasal orifice (reticulo-rumen exit) (on the right side of the cow) (on the right side of the cow) Esophagus
More informationHarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing
HarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing Frequently Asked Questions Why should I buy a HarvestLab? HarvestLab allows for on farm monitoring of the nutrient qualities in feedstuffs. It can be used during
More informationThe Nutritionist 2019
The Nutritionist 2019 Live and Recorded Ruminant Nutrition Webinars More Information at https://agmodelsystems.com/webinars/ Email: webinars@agmodelsystems.com 14 February 2019 9:00 am EST 5:00 pm EST
More informationHeidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA. Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective
Heidi Rossow, PhD UC Davis School Of Veterinary Medicine, VMTRC Tulare, CA Interpreting Forage Quality from the Cows Perspective Interpretation of chemical nutrient analyses Plant Nutrient Analyses Digestibility
More informationEFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:
1999 Animal Science Research Report Authors: EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY Story in Brief Pages 216-221 T.N. Bodine, H.T. Purvis II, M.T.
More informationBUILDING ON MILK PROTEIN
BUILDING ON MILK PROTEIN Michael F. Hutjens TAKE HOME MESSAGES Capturing the milk protein potential in a herd can increase milk value 30 to 50 cents per cwt (one hundred pounds). Amino acid balancing using
More informationUsing the 2001 Dairy NRC to Optimize the Use of Dietary Protein for Milk Protein Production
Using the 2001 Dairy NRC to Optimize the Use of Dietary Protein for Milk Protein Production Charles G. Schwab Department of Animal and Nutritional Sciences University of New Hampshire Durham, NH Introduction
More informationPrediction of the energy and protein value of DDGS for cattle
Prediction of the energy and protein value of DDGS for cattle De Boever J., Teirlynck E., Blok M.C. & De Brabander D. Johan.deboever@ilvo.vlaanderen.be EAAP/Bratislava 29/08/2012 Session 26 Institute for
More informationRation Formulation Models: Biological Reality vs. Models
Ration Formulation Models: Biological Reality vs. Models H.A. Rossow, Ph.D. Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Tulare, CA Email: heidi.rossow@gmail.com
More informationFIBER DIGESTIBILITY AND FORAGE FRAGILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE. K. Cotanch and R. Grant William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY
FIBER DIGESTIBILITY AND FORAGE FRAGILITY IN DAIRY CATTLE K. Cotanch and R. Grant William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY Physically Effective Fiber System INTRODUCTION Mertens (1997)
More informationCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
UC CE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Dried Corn Distillers Grains in Dairy Cattle Feeding Part 2 Nutrient Profiles, Variability and Key Impacts on Cattle P.H. Robinson Cooperative
More informationExercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points
Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points The objective of this laboratory exercise is to familiarize the student with the feed composition and nutrient requirement tables in the
More informationOverview of Today s Discussion
Determination of First Limiting Physical Factors in Corn Silage Hybrids: Modeling Multiple Pools of andfom Mike Van Amburgh, Mike Dineen, Andrew LaPierre, Joe Lawrence, Allison Kerwin and Tom Overton Dept.
More informationOilseed Meal Processing and Feeding Trials. William Gibbons Michael Brown, Jill Anderson South Dakota State University
Oilseed Meal Processing and Feeding Trials William Gibbons Michael Brown, Jill Anderson South Dakota State University Projects Oilseed meal processing Aquaculture trials Dairy cattle trials Oilseed Meal
More informationSupplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist
INTRODUCTION Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist Department of Dairy Science College of Agricultural and Life Sciences University
More informationAmino Acid Balancing in the Context of MP and RUP Requirements
Amino Acid Balancing in the Context of MP and RUP Requirements Charles G. Schwab, Ryan S. Ordway, and Nancy L. Whitehouse Department of Animal and Nutritional Sciences University of New Hampshire Durham,
More informationCHARACTERISATION OF FEEDSTUFFS FOR RUMINANTS
End of Project Report May, 2001 ARMIS No. 4383 CHARACTERISATION OF FEEDSTUFFS FOR RUMINANTS Authors A.P. Moloney, V.B.Woods and F.P. O Mara* Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Co. Meath Department
More informationForage Testing and Supplementation
Outline Forage Testing and Logan Wallace Livestock Specialist Testing Hay Nutrient Value/Requirements Strategies Management based Feed substitution Variance in Hay Species Maturities Weathering Why take
More informationEvaluation of five intake models predicting feed intake by dairy cows fed total mixed rations
Evaluation of five intake models predicting feed intake by dairy cows fed total mixed rations EAAP Conference August 28 2014 Laura Mie Jensen, N. I. Nielsen, E. Nadeau, B. Markussen, and P. Nørgaard Evaluation
More informationWhy Does the Dollar Value of Alfalfa Hay Not Continue to increase as its TDN Increases?
Why Does the Dollar Value of Alfalfa Hay Not Continue to increase as its TDN Increases? P.H. Robinson 1 and E.J. DePeters 2 1 Cooperative Extension Specialist and 2 Professor Department of Animal Science
More informationHIGHER FORAGE DIETS: DYNAMICS OF PASSAGE, DIGESTION, AND COW PRODUCTIVE RESPONSES
HIGHER FORAGE DIETS: DYNAMICS OF PASSAGE, DIGESTION, AND COW PRODUCTIVE RESPONSES R. J. Grant and K. W. Cotanch William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Chazy, NY BACKGROUND: FIBER WORKING GROUP
More informationLesson 2 Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Animals
Unit B Understanding Animal Body Systems Lesson 2 Meeting the Nutritional Needs of Animals 1 Terms Animal Proteins Basal Maintenance Requirement Concentrates Feed Feedstuff Fetus Forages Free Access Gestation
More information4º International Symposium on Advances on Ruminant Nutrition Research Techniques. Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. April 10-11, 2014.
4º International Symposium on Advances on Ruminant Nutrition Research Techniques. Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. April 10-11, 2014. Omasal and Reticular Sampling Techniques for Assessing Ruminal Digestion,
More informationN 18.5
N 18.5 sam.decampeneere@ilvo.vlaanderen.be Comparison of ensiled grass/white clover and grass/red clover for dairy cattle S. De Campeneere, J.L. De Boever and D.L. De BrabanderILVO,Animal Science Unit,
More informationEvaluation of the factors affecting silage intake of dairy cows: a revision of the relative silage dry-matter intake index
Animal (2007), 1: pp. 758 770 Q The Animal Consortium 2007 doi: 10.1017/S175173110773673X animal Evaluation of the factors affecting silage intake of dairy cows: a revision of the relative silage dry-matter
More informationDIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR
Dairy Day 2002 DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR E. E. Ferdinand, J. E. Shirley, E. C. Titgemeyer,
More informationFEEDING and MANAGEMENT OF DAMASCUS GOATS CYPRUS EXPERIENCE By Miltiades Hadjipanayiotou
DAMASCUS GOAT FEEDING and MANAGEMENT OF DAMASCUS GOATS CYPRUS EXPERIENCE By Miltiades Hadjipanayiotou Damascus goat is a breed originating from Syria, and is found as pure breed in many M.E. & N. African
More informationDietary Protein 10/21/2010. Protein is Required for: Crude Protein Requirement. Rumen Degradable Protein (RDP)
Dietary Protein Dr. Mark McGuire VS Department University of Idaho Some slides adapted from Dairy Nutrition & Management (NSI 200/492), University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Dr. Mike Hutjens & Jimmy
More informationReducing the reliance on purchased protein. Improving the value of home grown proteins
Reducing the reliance on purchased protein Improving the value of home grown proteins Liam A. Sinclair Harper Adams University, Edgmond, Shropshire, UK Apr-06 Apr-07 Apr-08 Apr-09 Apr-10 Apr-11 Apr-12
More informationNutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 1
DS38 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 1 Barney Harris, Jr. 2 Proper feeding and good balanced rations remain the cornerstone of a successful dairy operation. Milk yield per cow and the cost of feed
More informationCOOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS. Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and its Role in Alfalfa Analysis
UC CE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and its Role in Alfalfa Analysis P.H. Robinson Cooperative Extension Specialist Department of Animal Science University
More informationA Comparison of MIN-AD to MgO and Limestone in Peripartum Nutrition
A Comparison of MIN-AD to MgO and Limestone in Peripartum Nutrition D-9.0-03/17 Introduction Recent research has linked subclinical hypocalcemia, which impacts 11-25% of first lactation heifers and 42-60%
More informationNEW/EMERGING MEASUREMENTS FOR FORAGE QUALITY. Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT
NEW/EMERGING MEASUREMENTS FOR FORAGE QUALITY Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT A nationally accepted standard hay test for alfalfa hay has included measurement of Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Neutral Detergent Fiber
More informationMatching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test
Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test Ed Rayburn, Extension Specialist WVU Extension Service, Agriculture and Natural Resources October 2013 The conventional method for matching hay
More informationReproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays
The impact of P on absorbable P in dairy cattle rations Why the concern over P in dairy rations Reproductive efficiency Environment Phosphorus and Dairy Nutrition Perceived relationship of P content of
More informationEstimation of the Proportion of Feed Protein Digested in the Small Intestine of Cattle Consuming Wet Corn Gluten Feed
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science Animal Science Department 2007 Estimation of the Proportion of Feed Protein
More informationImpact of Processing and Genetics on Starch Digestibility
Impact of Processing and Genetics on Starch Digestibility 2012 VSFA / Cow College Ralph Ward, President Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Hagerstown, Maryland Factors Affecting Starch Digestion In
More informationProspects of Palm Kernel Cake. use in Cattle Feed
Prospects of Palm Kernel Cake use in Cattle Feed Dr. Tariq Mahmood D.V.M., M.Sc. Animal Nutrition M.S. Total Quality Management Diploma in Feed Technology and Formulation, NCSU, USA General Manager Operations
More informationAre we near recommendations for individual amino acids to dairy cows?
Are we near recommendations for individual amino acids to dairy cows? Fodringsdag 2018 September 2018, Herning DK H. Lapierre 1, D.R. Ouellet 1 & R. Martineau 1 S. Binggeli 2 & D. Pellerin 2 1 Agriculture
More informationFeed ID Options /10/2016. DM% CP% TDN% Fat% Ca% P%
Feed ID Options Ammonium Chloride Beet Pulp Shreds w/molasses Blood Meal Calcium Carbonate Calf Manna Corn Gluten Pellets Cottonseed Hull Pellets Cottonseed Hulls Cottonseed Meal Dehydrated Alfalfa Pellets
More informationLamb Weaning and Nutrition
Lamb Weaning and Nutrition Weaner survival (%) 100 90 80 70 60 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Liveweight at weaning (kg) A balanced ration must provide: Energy Protein Roughage Vitamins and Minerals Effect of Energy
More informationCTR DAIRY 2018 Page 1 of 21
Page 1 of 21 CTRDAIRY 2018 A WithinDay Feeding Strategy Evaluator for Grazing Dairy Cows Version Number 2018 Regional Software Dissemination Site: USA 1/1/2018 (C) 2018 The Regents of The University of
More informationIn Vitro Digestibility of Forages
81 In Vitro Digestibility of Forages Masahito Oba 1,3 and Mike Allen 2 1 Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta 2 Department of Animal Science Michigan State University
More informationBUCHI NIR Applications Feed Industry
BUCHI NIR Applications Feed Industry You need fast and reliable information about your samples in order to make far-reaching decisions. We support you in overcoming your daily challenges, from incoming
More informationStretching Limited Hay Supplies: Wet Cows Fed Low Quality Hay Jason Banta, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension
ASWeb - 145 September 2018 Stretching Limited Hay Supplies: Wet Cows Fed Low Quality Hay Jason Banta, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Many producers are facing low hay supplies
More information