European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)"

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 06 April 2017 doi: /sp.efsa.2017.en-1210 Outcome of the preliminary pesticides peer review meeting on the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties in mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology Abstract European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) This document reflects the outcome of the experts discussions during the joint session on the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties in mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology adjacent to the Pesticides Peer Review meetings 148 and 149. The main scope of the meeting was to have a first discussion on the scientific implementation of the European Commission (EC) draft criteria for the identification of an endocrine disruptor in the area of mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology for plant protection products, and the type of information possibly needed for this implementation. This also gave the possibility to the experts to raise questions, to express their view and to provide suggestions which could be taken into consideration during the drafting of the EFSA and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) guidance entitled Guidance Document for the Implementation of the Hazard-based Criteria to Identify Endocrine Disruptors. Conclusions and further recommendations on these issues are reported. European Food Safety Authority, 2017 Key words: pesticides, mammalian toxicology, ecotoxicology, endocrine disrupting properties Requestor: European Commission Question number: EFSA-Q Correspondence: 1 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

2 Suggested citation: EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Technical report on the outcome of the preliminary pesticides peer review meeting on the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties in mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology. EFSA supporting publication 2017:EN pp. doi: /sp.efsa.2017.en-1210 ISSN: European Food Safety Authority, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 2 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

3 Summary On 15 June 2016, the European Commission (EC) presented the proposed scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (ED) in the field of plant protection products and biocides and asked the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to start activities that will allow the implementation of these criteria as soon as they will be approved (European Commission, 2016a, 2016c). Subsequently, on 17 October 2016 EC sent a mandate to EFSA and ECHA to prepare a common guidance document on the hazard identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EC) No 1107/2009 and (EU) No 528/2012 (European Commission, 2016e) based on the proposed criteria. In the frame of these activities and in direct collaboration with ECHA, EFSA organised a joint meeting aiming at having an exchange of views with Member States (MS) experts on the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties in mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology. The meeting was meant to give the possibility to the experts to raise questions, to express their views and their possible suggestions regarding the guidance that is to be developed by EFSA and ECHA. This joint meeting took place in October 2016 as part of the Pesticides Peer Review meetings 148 on mammalian toxicology and 149 on ecotoxicology. An introductory presentation was given by EFSA regarding the EC proposed criteria. Afterwards, experts from the Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI) gave a presentation on three case studies with the purpose to facilitate the discussion. These case studies were part of the BPI work, as EC external contractor, for the implementation of the Join Research Centre (JRC) methodology on screening the ED properties of preselected chemicals (European Commission, 2016b) in order to be used in the EC impact assessment. A discussion between all the participants followed. The issues discussed were on the practical aspects of the implementation of the criteria, on the possible use of the methodology developed by JRC, the data requirements and the adequacy of testing protocols. In addition, it was discussed which elements should be included in the guidance that will be developed by EFSA and ECHA. The experts views and conclusions from the meeting are presented in this report and will be taken into consideration during the drafting of the EFSA / ECHA guidance. 3 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

4 Table of contents Abstract... 1 Summary Introduction Points of discussions JRC methodology: clarifications and possible use Implementation of the criteria: information needed Use of non-standard studies and old protocols Elements to be considered in the guidance document Overall EFSA conclusions and recommendations... 8 References Abbreviations EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

5 1. Introduction On 15 June 2016, the European Commission (EC) presented the proposed scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties (ED) in the field of plant protection products and biocides and asked the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to start activities that will allow the implementation of these criteria as soon as they will be approved (European Commission, 2016a, 2016c). Subsequently, on the 17 October 2016 EC sent a mandate to EFSA and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to prepare a common guidance document on the hazard identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EC) No 1107/ and (EU) No 528/ (European Commission, 2016e) based on the proposed criteria. Before setting the draft criteria, EC implemented an impact assessment for the evaluation of the potential health, socio-economic and environmental impacts of applying different options for the criteria (European Commission, 2016d). In the frame of this impact assessment the Joint Research Centre (JRC) developed a screening methodology for ED identification without intention to pre-empt regulatory conclusions that may eventually be made under different pieces of EU legislation (JRC, 2016). Later on, this methodology was applied by the Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI), as external contractor, on a list of pre-selected substances provided by JRC (European Commission, 2016b; 2016f). In order to start the discussion with the Member States (MS) experts, EFSA organised a joint mammalian toxicology / ecotoxicology session that took place on 26 October 2016 as part of the Pesticides Peer Review meeting 148 on mammalian toxicology and 149 on ecotoxicology. The scope of this meeting was to have an exchange of views with the Member States experts on the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties in mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology, in view of the on-going discussions on the implementation of the proposed criteria. The meeting was meant to give the possibility to the experts to raise questions, to express their view and their possible suggestions regarding the guidance that is to be developed by EFSA and ECHA. An introductory presentation was given by EFSA regarding the EC proposed criteria. Afterwards, experts from the Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI) gave a presentation on three case studies with the purpose to facilitate the discussion. These case studies were part of the BPI work, as EC external contractor, for the implementation of the JRC methodology on screening the ED properties of preselected chemicals in order to be used in the EC impact assessment. A discussion between all the participants followed. The issues discussed were related to the JRC methodology and its possible use, to the practical aspects of the implementation of the criteria, including data requirements and adequacy of testing protocols. In addition, it was discussed which elements should be included in the guidance that will be developed by EFSA and ECHA. 2. Points of discussions 2.1. JRC methodology: clarifications and possible use As mentioned above a presentation was given during the meeting on the application of the methodology developed by JRC (JRC, 2016) to 600 pre-selected chemicals (European Commission, 2016b). This was followed by a discussion where a number of clarifications were provided by BPI regarding the implementation of the methodology: Though the avian reproduction studies were initially captured, later they were not considered of added value as effects observed in these studies may be indicative of an endocrine mode of action (MoA), but cannot be exclusively linked to that. However, the experts expressed the view that those data should be included in the weight of evidence (WoE), as they may be highly relevant when considered together with other existing evidence. The amphibian metamorphosis studies were considered in the assessment, when available. 1 Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of 21 October 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. OJ L 309, , p Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products. OJ L 167, , p EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

6 The causality and plausibility of the link between the adverse effect and the endocrine mode of action were judged by the BPI experts, since no specific guidance was given on this matter by the JRC methodology. It was not considered necessary to capture the information regarding the ecotoxicological relevance at the population level in the Data sheet. This was addressed finally in the Evaluation sheet after gathering all effects in the data summary sheet. Potential categorisation of a compound was derived even in the absence of mechanistic data, based only on the manifested adversity as in this exercise the request for further data was not an option. All data were used as presented in the available reports without re-evaluation by the contractor. Read across approaches were not performed by BPI but only used when and as reported on the assessments already available. Considering the time constraints and the related scope (impact assessment), some rules and assumptions had to be set in order to speed up the process. This screening and the related assessment were not meant to substitute an in depth assessment by the Authorities. Some experts highlighted the fundamental difference between the absence of data and the existence of negative data and the possible influence on the conclusion. BPI clarified that this difference was not considered by the methodology and its implementation, meaning that in the decision trees the answer no for the questions in vivo mechanistic effects or in vitro mechanistic effects may mean absence of data or presence of negative response. It was noted, however, that although the answer was the same, the reasoning was included in the Evaluation sheet. Some experts expressed the view that all evidences should be considered in combination, in order to weight their value and to reach a final conclusion. The screening methodology served the needs of the impact assessment. The experts expressed the view that it is of limited value as such for the regulatory assessment but it could be further considered for the development of a fit for purpose methodology and data evaluation Implementation of the criteria: information needed EFSA proposed to the experts to discuss, as starting point, the information needed for the identification of endocrine properties. For example, it was considered whether a minimum dataset should be identified for assessing ED properties of any substance under evaluation. The views expressed are presented below: General EC highlighted that, when additional data and specific studies are required, these should be adequate and sufficient to draw a conclusion without further requests. Experts questioned whether the studies mentioned in the data requirements (Commission Regulations (EU) No 283/ ) have the power to detect ED effects. Some experts pointed out that, in principle, these data could provide sufficient evidence to identify potential candidates for further ED assessment. Currently the parameters that should be used as alerts of ED properties have not been well defined and should be further identified together with the studies to be required for the clarification of the endocrine mode of action. It was also questioned by the experts whether in vitro mechanistic studies should be requested by default for all substances or only when available studies provide some evidence/indication of ED properties. Furthermore, it was questioned whether it is appropriate to conclude on the basis of in vitro data (in case of positive evidence) or whether it is necessary to ask for in vivo mechanistic studies. 3 Commission Regulation (EU) No 283/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for active substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. OJ L 93, , p EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

7 Some experts expressed the view that it should be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate the absence of ED properties, and therefore it should also be their responsibility to identify the appropriate set of studies to demonstrate this. Some experts referred to the possibility to implement the level 1 of the conceptual framework of the OECD guidance document 150 (OECD, 2012) and proposed to consider this issue in the future EFSA/ECHA guidance document. It was also highlighted that this framework was built for being applied also to substances for which no information is available (and so only level 1 can be used), and this is never the case for pesticides for which experimental data are always available in the dossier. Discussing the OECD 150 guidance document, some experts highlighted that the studies included are not appropriate to conclude on clear mechanistic effects. In addition, it was noted that it is not appropriate to move in a linear fashion through the Conceptual Framework and it was further suggested to give feedback or interact with the OECD to update guidelines. Some experts commented that, in principle, new vertebrate studies should not be requested. It was generally discussed that it may be appropriate to establish a step wise approach for data requirements. It was also pointed out that the guidance should address which data should be requested whenever some indications of ED properties are identified in a first step. Mammalian toxicology Some experts commented that, with the standard available dataset (Commission Regulations (EU) No 283/ ), there are insufficient data in the area of mammalian toxicology to conclude on the ED properties of the substance. Other experts pointed out that, although in the toxicological part ED related mechanistic studies are not mandatory, several data might be already available (e.g. in vitro data, studies with a more mechanistic focus), and these could also inform the ecotoxicological section. Ecotoxicology It was pointed out by some experts that no in vitro studies are currently included in the data requirements for ecotoxicological assessment (Commission Regulations (EU) No 283/ and No 284/ ). It was highlighted that even in the presence of the same mechanistic onset the apical consequence could be different among different taxa. Some experts expressed the wish to include in vitro data in the ecotoxicology data requirements. Some experts pointed out that in the OECD guidance document 150 there are proposed ED related ecotoxicological studies, covered by specific technical guidelines (TG). These studies are not part of the legal data requirements but the experts suggested that they should be included. Some experts questioned whether invertebrates should be considered in the guidance EFSA and ECHA will develop Use of non-standard studies and old protocols It was commented that sometimes in a complete dossier no evidence of ED properties is seen in the legally required and submitted studies. Nevertheless, available non-standard literature data may capture aspects that are not covered in the dossier. In such cases, further data may be requested to confirm / exclude the concern raised in the non-standard study. Some experts expressed their concern that criteria are missing for evaluating the quality and the results of non-standard studies from the literature. The experts highlighted that some of the studies performed according to old versions of the OECD guidelines miss investigating endpoints that are relevant for ED assessment. 4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for plant protection products, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. OJ L 93, , p EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

8 2.4. Elements to be considered in the guidance document The experts mentioned the following elements as important issues to be included in the EFSA / ECHA guidance: List of the relevant studies among the data requirements (especially for the area of ecotoxicology). List of endpoints and effects to look at in terms of specific / generic effects. How to assess the available information from public literature (relevance / reliability)? How to perform the read-across between substances? How to decide whether effects on non target organisms are relevant at population level Criteria for the WoE for minimising the expert judgement. How to structure the assessment covering both mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology? Need for a decision scheme based on the available data / evidence. Need for a set of case studies. Update of the information included in the OECD guidance document 150 (in terms of available study protocols). Which aspects/parameters should be looked at in the old studies regarding ED properties and how to fill the gap between the old and the new protocols? How data gaps should be addressed. How to assess epidemiological data? Criteria for the definition of adversity. Evaluation and WoE of the ToxCast in vitro data ( March 2017). Assessment of uncertainty. Development of adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for ED. Minimum data requirements to identify the MoA. How to deal with contradictory results? Clear indications on how to establish a plausible link (biological relevance). 3. Overall EFSA conclusions and recommendations During the meeting a number of clarifications were given regarding the JRC methodology and its implementation by the contractor. The screening methodology serves the needs of the impact assessment. The experts expressed the view that it is of limited value as such for the regulatory assessment but it could be further considered for the development of a fit for purpose methodology and data evaluation. It was clear from the overall discussion that setting a well-defined set of data as the minimum requirement for the identification of ED is a challenging task. It is also clear that the main gap in the data requirements set in the Commission Regulations (EU) No 283/ and No 284/ is related to mechanistic information. It is highly probable that in a number of cases additional data would be needed. The extension and nature of these data should be further discussed and they should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The use of studies performed with old protocols or non-standard studies should be considered but further discussion is needed regarding their quality assessment and weight to be given. A step wise approach and/or a decision scheme are considered by the majority of the experts as an appropriate methodology. 8 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

9 The experts proposed a number of issues to be addressed in the EFSA / ECHA guidance. In overall, the comments and views expressed during this joint session regarding both mammalian toxicology and ecotoxicology will be taken into consideration during the development of the guidance. EFSA acknowledged the contributions from the experts, and indicated that additional information on the involvement of MS experts in the guidance development was to be discussed with ECHA and included in the EFSA / ECHA outline paper entitled Outline of Draft Guidance Document for the Implementation of the Hazard-based Criteria to Identify Endocrine Disruptors. This outline paper was published on 20 December (EFSA and ECHA, 2016). 9 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

10 References EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) and ECHA (European Chemicals Agency), Outline of Draft Guidance Document for the Implementation of the Hazard-based Criteria to Identify Endocrine Disruptors. 20 December 2016, 12 pp. European Commission, 2016a. Commission presents scientific criteria to identify endocrine disruptors in the pesticides and biocides areas. Press release, 15 June 2016, 2 pp. European Commission, 2016b. Selection of chemical substances to be screened in the context of the impact assessment on criteria to identify endocrine disruptors. 15 June 2016, 23 pp. European Commission, 2016c. Criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties under the PPP Regulation EFSA s key role for their implementation. Ares(2016) June 2016, 2 pp. European Commission, 2016d. Commission Staff working document impact assessment, Defining criteria for identifying endocrine disruptors in the context of the implementation of the plant protection products regulation and biocidal products regulation, Main report, 15 June 2016, SWD(2016) 211 final, 414 pp. European Commission, 2016e. Mandate to EFSA and ECHA for scientific and technical assistance in order to develop a common Guidance Document for the implementation of the hazard based criteria to identify endocrine disruptors. Ares(2016) October 2016, 3 pp. European Commission, 2016f. Screening of available evidence on chemical substances for the identification of endocrine disruptors according to different options in the context of an Impact Assessment, Specific Contract SANTE/2015/E3/SI , Final report, ISBN doi: / pp. JRC (Joint Research Centre), Screening methodology to identify potential endocrine disruptors according to different options in the context of an impact assessment; EUR EN; doi: / pp. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Series on Testing and Assessment: No 150: Guidance Document on Standardised Test Guidelines for Evaluating Chemicals for Endocrine Disruption. ENV/JM/MONO(2012)22, 524 pp EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

11 Abbreviations a.s. active substance AOP Adverse Outcome Pathway BPI Benaki Phytopathological Institute EC European Commission ECHA European Chemical Agency ED endocrine disruptor, endocrine disruption EU European Union JRC Joint Research Centre MoA mode of action MS Member State OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development TG technical guideline ToxCast EPA's Toxicity Forecaster WoE weight of evidence 11 EFSA Supporting publication 2017:EN-1210

First Phase of Impact Assessment on Endocrine Disruptors:

First Phase of Impact Assessment on Endocrine Disruptors: First Phase of Impact Assessment on Endocrine Disruptors: How to screen which chemicals would fall under different options for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors EU Conference on Endocrine Disruptors,

More information

DRAFT COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

DRAFT COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX C(2016) 3752 projet DRAFT COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX setting out scientific criteria for the determination of endocrine-disrupting properties pursuant

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 03/05/2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1223 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for L-ascorbic acid in light

More information

Action plan for improving the peer review process. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Action plan for improving the peer review process. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 29 November 2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1349 Action plan for improving the peer review process European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Abstract This document reflects on the

More information

Challenges in environmental risk assessment (ERA) for birds and mammals and link to endocrine disruption (ED) Katharina Ott, BASF SE, Crop Protection

Challenges in environmental risk assessment (ERA) for birds and mammals and link to endocrine disruption (ED) Katharina Ott, BASF SE, Crop Protection Challenges in environmental risk assessment (ERA) for birds and mammals and link to endocrine disruption (ED) Katharina Ott, BASF SE, Crop Protection Charles River Symposium, Den Bosch, 3rd October 2017

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 11 April 2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1213 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for Straight Chain Lepidopteran

More information

APPROVED: 17 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 27 March 2015

APPROVED: 17 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 27 March 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 17 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 27 March 2015 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for tall oil crude in light of

More information

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.6.2016 COM(2016) 350 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on endocrine disruptors and the draft Commission acts setting out

More information

Evaluation of the emergency authorisations granted by Member State Finland for plant protection products containing clothianidin or thiamethoxam

Evaluation of the emergency authorisations granted by Member State Finland for plant protection products containing clothianidin or thiamethoxam TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 14 May 2018 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1419 Evaluation of the emergency authorisations granted by Member State Finland for plant protection products containing clothianidin

More information

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANTE/11992/2017 Rev. 0 [ ](2017) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 by setting out scientific criteria for

More information

APPROVED: 30 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 15 April 2015

APPROVED: 30 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 15 April 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 30 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 15 April 2015 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for 1-naphthylacetamide in light

More information

EFSA Statement regarding the EU assessment of glyphosate and the socalled

EFSA Statement regarding the EU assessment of glyphosate and the socalled EFSA Statement regarding the EU assessment of glyphosate and the socalled Monsanto papers Background On 29 May 2017, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to produce a statement concerning

More information

EFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea Gervelmeyer

EFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea Gervelmeyer TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 29 June 2018 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1446 Abstract EFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea

More information

Draft Concept Paper. 05. Mai Seite 1 von 20

Draft Concept Paper. 05. Mai Seite 1 von 20 Draft Concept Paper Development of a Stepwise Procedure for the Assessment of Substances with Endocrine Disrupting Properties According to the Plant Protection Products Regulation (Reg. (EC) No 1107/2009)

More information

Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on general recurring issues in mammalian toxicology

Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on general recurring issues in mammalian toxicology TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 25 July 2016 Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on general recurring issues in mammalian toxicology Abstract European Food Safety Authority This technical report reflects

More information

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS 21.2.2015 L 50/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/282 of 20 February 2015 amending Annexes VIII, IX and X to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament

More information

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document Substance Name: tributyl O-acetylcitrate (ATBC) EC Number: 201-067-0 CAS Number: 77-90-7 Authority: France Date: August 2016 Version 2.1 October 2015

More information

FÜR RISIKOBEWERTUNG BUNDESINSTITUT

FÜR RISIKOBEWERTUNG BUNDESINSTITUT BUNDESINSTITUT FÜR RISIKOBEWERTUNG Legal and Practical Aspects of the Cut-off Criteria for Reproductive Toxic and Endocrine Disrupting Effects for Approval and Classification of Pesticides in Europe Roland

More information

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit

Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides. Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit Recent Developments and Future Plans in the EFSA Assessments of Pesticides Hermine Reich Pesticides Unit Pesticides Unit and Panel activities Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Product and their Residues

More information

Preparatory work to support the re-evaluation of technological feed additives

Preparatory work to support the re-evaluation of technological feed additives EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT APPROVED: 26 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 10 April 2015 Preparatory work to support the re-evaluation of technological feed additives IRTA 1, ACSA 2 N. Tous 1, J. Brufau 1, A. Pérez-Vendrell

More information

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.7.2017 C(2017) 4462 final COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 4.7.2017 on the identification of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl

More information

Application of human epidemiological studies to pesticide risk assessment

Application of human epidemiological studies to pesticide risk assessment Workshop What does the future hold for harmonised human health risk assessment of plant protection products? Application of human epidemiological studies to pesticide risk assessment Antonio F. Hernández,

More information

Contribution to the European Commission s Public Consultation on. 15 January 2015

Contribution to the European Commission s Public Consultation on. 15 January 2015 Contribution to the European Commission s Public Consultation on Defining criteria for identifying Endocrine Disruptors in the context of the implementation of the Plant Protection Product Regulation and

More information

Pesticide risk assessment: changes and perspectives for mammalian toxicology in the new EC regulation 1107/2009

Pesticide risk assessment: changes and perspectives for mammalian toxicology in the new EC regulation 1107/2009 Pesticide risk assessment: changes and perspectives for mammalian toxicology in the new EC regulation 1107/2009 M.Tiramani Pesticide Risk Assessment Peer Review (PRAPeR) Mammalian toxicology New Pesticide

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) STATEMENT ADOPTED: 5 July 2018 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5383 Statement on the impact of the harmonised classification on the conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active

More information

We are concerned that the focus of the document is on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and

We are concerned that the focus of the document is on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and Dear Members of the Guidance Document Drafting Group, The Endocrine Society appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft guidance for identifying endocrine disruptors. Founded in 1916, the Endocrine

More information

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) (Question No EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) (Question No EFSA-Q ) The EFSA Journal (2009) 1171, 1-6 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Updating the opinion related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products

More information

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union 1.6.2016 L 144/27 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2016/863 of 31 May 2016 amending Annexes VII and VIII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation,

More information

AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF 4,4'-ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL (BISPHENOL A) AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN

AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF 4,4'-ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL (BISPHENOL A) AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF 4,4'-ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL (BISPHENOL A) AS A SUBSTANCE OF VERY HIGH CONCERN According to Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation (EC) 1907/2006

More information

of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety The Director General Maisons-Alfort, 27 March 2012 of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety regarding a request for scientific and technical support for the revising

More information

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy EFSA Journal 2012;10(7):2841 REASONED OPINION Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for paraffin oil (CAS 64742-54-7) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No

More information

Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals

Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals Submission of higher tier studies on vertebrate animals for REACH registration without a regulatory decision on testing

More information

Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for cyflumetofen in light of confirmatory data

Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for cyflumetofen in light of confirmatory data TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 11 February 2016 PUBLISHED: 25 February 2016 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for cyflumetofen in light

More information

Data sources on animal diseases: Country Card of Poland. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Data sources on animal diseases: Country Card of Poland. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 15 January 2019 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1550 Data sources on animal diseases: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Abstract Mapping the data sources on animal diseases in

More information

Data sources on animal diseases: Country Card of Finland. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Data sources on animal diseases: Country Card of Finland. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 6 February 2019 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.en-1576 Data sources on animal diseases: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Abstract Mapping the data sources on animal diseases in

More information

Developmental neurotoxicity & REACH

Developmental neurotoxicity & REACH Developmental neurotoxicity & REACH Hannele Huuskonen DNT WS 2016 REACH Article 1 The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment, including the

More information

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area Juan Manuel Parra Morte. Pesticides Unit. EFSA. 19th Annual Conference of the

More information

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 11.3.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 64/15 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 234/2011 of 10 March 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council

More information

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 DECEMBER 2012 (Section General Food Law)

SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 DECEMBER 2012 (Section General Food Law) EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Brussels, SANCO E 1718316 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 DECEMBER 2012 (Section

More information

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 13 February 2014 (OR. en) 6438/14 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 3 February 2014 To: No. Cion doc.: PHARM 14 SAN 72 MI 161 COMPET 107 DELACT 29 Secretary-General

More information

Laura Beatriz Herrero Montarelo, Maria Dolores Gómez Vázquez and Victorio José Teruel Muñoz

Laura Beatriz Herrero Montarelo, Maria Dolores Gómez Vázquez and Victorio José Teruel Muñoz Collaboration Laura Beatriz Herrero Montarelo, Maria Dolores Gómez Vázquez and Victorio José Teruel Muñoz Nutritional Risk Management Area of the Subdirectorate-General for Food Safety Promotion Spanish

More information

ECPA position paper on the criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties under Regulation

ECPA position paper on the criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties under Regulation POSITION PAPER 09/06/2016 PP/14/PD/23734 ECPA position paper on the criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties under Regulation The European Commission is currently developing new

More information

Questions and Answers on Candidates for Substitution

Questions and Answers on Candidates for Substitution Questions and Answers on Candidates for Substitution Rev. 1, January 2015 Background The European Commission is required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 ( the Regulation ) to establish a list of substances

More information

Feedback from the Member States questionnaire

Feedback from the Member States questionnaire Annex 6 Feedback from the Member States questionnaire Reinhilde A.R. Schoonjans Special meeting of the EFSA Advisory Forum on GMO risk assessment in Europe 13 November 2007, Brussels Topics 1. Highlights

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Food and feed safety, innovation Pesticides and biocides COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1 Basic Substance diammonium phosphate SANTE/12351/2015

More information

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet

The regulatory landscape. The now and the not yet The regulatory landscape The now and the not yet Perspectives Aims Promote common understanding Anticipate the coming changes Prepare for afternoon sessions Who governs pesticides? All EU legislation comes

More information

FoodDrinkEurope Position on GLP studies

FoodDrinkEurope Position on GLP studies FoodDrinkEurope Position on GLP studies Content of the presentation Introduction to GLP Importance of GLP for the food industry Use of GLP based on the example of novel foods Conclusions GLP what is it?

More information

APPROVED: 05 February 2016 PUBLISHED: 15 February 2016

APPROVED: 05 February 2016 PUBLISHED: 15 February 2016 STATEMENT APPROVED: 05 February 2016 PUBLISHED: 15 February 2016 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4405 Assessment of the pesticide active substance carvone (d-/l-carvone at a ratio of at least 100:1) for inclusion

More information

Standard Operating Procedure. Selection of studies performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice for audit purposes

Standard Operating Procedure. Selection of studies performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice for audit purposes Scope To describe the procedure for EFSA to request on a yearly or ad-hoc basis the performance of GLP studies audits by the GLP Monitoring Authorities. To lay down criteria for the selection of the GLP

More information

GLP in the European Union Ecolabel detergents, GLP and accreditation

GLP in the European Union Ecolabel detergents, GLP and accreditation GLP in the European Union Ecolabel detergents, GLP and accreditation Maik Schmahl Brussels, 25/03/2010 Chemicals Unit Outline What is GLP? How has it developed? The role of the Member States, the European

More information

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX Ref. Ares(2016)5616438-28/09/2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2016) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX amending Annex III to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of

More information

Good Laboratory Practice. EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014

Good Laboratory Practice. EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014 Good Laboratory Practice EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014 Table of contents 1. Background information on the principles of GLP 2. EU legal basis for GLP 3. Role of Member States 4. Role

More information

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19. Call for scientific and technical data on the permitted food additives E 140(i) chlorophylls, E 140(ii) chlorophyllins, E 141(i) copper complexes of chlorophylls and E 141(ii) copper complexes of chlorophyllins

More information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 22.12.2008 COM(2008) 882 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE

More information

Assessment and regulation of endocrine disrupters under European chemical legislations Susy Brescia Chemicals Regulation Directorate (CRD) HSE

Assessment and regulation of endocrine disrupters under European chemical legislations Susy Brescia Chemicals Regulation Directorate (CRD) HSE Health and and Safety Executive Assessment and regulation of endocrine disrupters under European chemical legislations Susy Brescia Chemicals Regulation Directorate (CRD) HSE EDs and the current EU legislative

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Food and feed safety, innovation Pesticides and biocides Basic Substance Mustard seeds powder SANTE/11309/2017 rev. 2 6 October 2017 Final

More information

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. P8_TA-PROV(2016)0384 Implementation of the Food Contact Materials Regulation

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. P8_TA-PROV(2016)0384 Implementation of the Food Contact Materials Regulation European Parliament 2014-2019 TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition P8_TA-PROV(2016)0384 Implementation of the Food Contact Materials Regulation European Parliament resolution of 6 October 2016 on the implementation

More information

Evaluation of active substances in plant protection products Residues Anja Friel European Food Safetey Authority, Parma/ Italy

Evaluation of active substances in plant protection products Residues Anja Friel European Food Safetey Authority, Parma/ Italy Evaluation of active substances in plant protection products Residues Anja Friel European Food Safetey Authority, Parma/ Italy European Conference on MRL-Setting for Biocides Berlin, 18-19 March 2014 Legal

More information

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team)

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team) Scientific Guidance Document of the PPR Panel on the establishment of the residue definition to be used for dietary risk assessment (EFSA-Q-2013-01001) EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September 2016

More information

RISK MANAGEMENT OPTION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION DOCUMENT

RISK MANAGEMENT OPTION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION DOCUMENT RISK MANAGEMENT OPTION ANALYSIS CONCLUSION DOCUMENT for Substance name: 2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4,6-tris(3,3,3- trifluoropropyl)cyclotrisiloxane, F-D3 EC number: 219-154-7 CAS number: 2374-14-3 Member State(s):

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 09 JUNE 2015

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 09 JUNE 2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL sante.ddg2.g.dir(2015)2952292 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 09 JUNE 2015

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 24 July 2018 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1470 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for iodosulfuron and prosulfuron

More information

Title: Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals a consensus statement

Title: Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals a consensus statement Title: Scientific principles for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals a consensus statement Outcome of an international expert meeting organized by the German Federal Institute for Risk

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2015

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Brussels sante.ddg2.g.dir(2015)934853 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 10 FEBRUARY

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Health systems and products Medicinal products authorisations, European Medicines Agency PHARM 689 PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE 21 October 2015

More information

The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 A public consultation Contents Introduction... 3 Why we are consulting... 4 Nutrition and Health Claims... 6 Proposals... 6 Vitamins, minerals, and

More information

NORDISKE ARBEJDSPAPIRER

NORDISKE ARBEJDSPAPIRER Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org NORDISKE ARBEJDSPAPIRER N O R D I C W O R K I N G P A P E R S Verifying the Efficacy of Biocidal Products and Treated Articles - a comparative study

More information

State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity. Executive Summary

State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity. Executive Summary State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity Final Report Executive Summary 22 December 2009 Study Contract Number 070307/2007/485103/ETU/D.1 Contractor The School of Pharmacy University of London (ULSOP)

More information

EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the lifecycle of applications for regulated products

EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the lifecycle of applications for regulated products TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 12 March 2015 PUBLISHED: 16 03 2015 EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the lifecycle of applications for regulated products Abstract European Food Safety Authority

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1 EFSA Technical Report (2009) 279, 1-13 TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1 Prepared by the Secretariat of the Scientific Committee

More information

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings Version 2 Updated on 29/11/2011 Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings Valid as of: 11 September 2011 Disclaimer: This

More information

U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods

U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods U.S. EPA Strategic Plan to Promote the Development and Implementation of Alternative Test Methods Louis Scarano, US EPA SCHC Meeting April 25, 2018 Orlando,FL Statutory Mandate In 2016, TSCA was amended

More information

Justification for the selection of a substance for CoRAP inclusion

Justification for the selection of a substance for CoRAP inclusion Justification for the selection of a substance for CoRAP inclusion Substance Name (Public Name): Chemical Group: Aluminium chloride inorganic mono constituent substance EC Number: 231-208-1 CAS Number:

More information

REPORT OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY FORUM MEETING ON EU GMO RISK ASSESSMENT

REPORT OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY FORUM MEETING ON EU GMO RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY FORUM MEETING ON EU GMO RISK ASSESSMENT 13 November 2007 Introduction Over 60 EU GMO risk assessment experts, nominated by the Advisory Forum members and representing the

More information

Trisodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA)

Trisodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) RISK MANAGEMENT OPTIONS ANALYSIS CONCLUSION DOCUMENT for Trisodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA) EC No 225-768-6 CAS No 5064-31-3 Member State: Denmark Dated: August 2014, Final version Disclaimer: Please note

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2015

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Ares (2016) 440074 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2015 (Section

More information

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) Opinion on the application for approval of the active substance: Hydrated lime Product type: 2 ECHA/BPC/100/2016 Adopted 14 April 2016 Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121

More information

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE VICH GL54 (SAFETY) ARfD November 2016 For Implementation at Step 7 STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE (ARfD)

More information

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) Opinion on the application for approval of the active substance: Hydrated lime Product type: 3 ECHA/BPC/101/2016 Adopted 14 April 2016 Annankatu 18, P.O. Box 400, FI-00121

More information

Reproductive toxicity classification under CLP (Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of chemicals)

Reproductive toxicity classification under CLP (Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of chemicals) Reproductive toxicity classification under CLP (Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of chemicals) A satellite workshop to the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Teratology

More information

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents 1997R0258 EN 07.08.2009 004.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B REGULATION (EC) No 258/97 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

More information

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW. Summary Record of Meeting of 30 April 2012

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW. Summary Record of Meeting of 30 April 2012 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH SECTION ON GENERAL FOOD LAW Summary Record of Meeting of 30 April 2012 Chairmen: Mr Basil

More information

APPROVED: 14 April 2015 PUBLISHED: 17 April 2015

APPROVED: 14 April 2015 PUBLISHED: 17 April 2015 TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 14 April 2015 PUBLISHED: 17 April 2015 Response to comments on the Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) on the scientific

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 13 JUNE 2014

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 13 JUNE 2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Brussels, SANCO G ARES(2014)2253750 SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE FOOD CHAIN AND ANIMAL HEALTH HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 13 JUNE

More information

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1. Review report for the active substance Copper compounds

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1. Review report for the active substance Copper compounds EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate E Safety of the food chain Unit E.3 - Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT 1 Review report for

More information

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Ref. Ares(2019)290814-18/01/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Health and food audits and analysis DG(SANTE) 2018-6428 FINAL REPORT OF AN AUDIT CARRIED OUT IN PORTUGAL

More information

C 178/2 Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/2 Official Journal of the European Union C 178/2 Official Journal of the European Union 29.7.2003 Communication from the Commission on Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council on orphan medicinal products (2003/C

More information

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19. Call for scientific and technical data on the permitted food additives sulphur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulphite (E 221), sodium bisulphite (E 222), sodium metabisulphite (E 223), potassium metabisulphite

More information

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDES PEER REVIEW

CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDES PEER REVIEW CONCLUSION ON PESTICIDES PEER REVIEW APPROVED: 11 October 2016 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4606 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance clothianidin in light of confirmatory

More information

Statement on the conditions of use for health claims related to meal replacements for weight control

Statement on the conditions of use for health claims related to meal replacements for weight control SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 28 October 2015 PUBLISHED: 13 November 2015 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4287 Statement on the conditions of use for health claims related to meal replacements for weight control

More information

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANTE/11174/2016 (POOL/E1/2016/E1/11174/11174- EN.doc) [ ](2017) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX amending the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 609/2013

More information

Background EVM. FAO/WHO technical workshop on nutrient risk assessment, Geneva, May 2005, published 2006.

Background EVM. FAO/WHO technical workshop on nutrient risk assessment, Geneva, May 2005, published 2006. UK GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE SETTING OF MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM AMOUNTS FOR VITAMINS AND MINERALS IN FOODSTUFFS. Background The United Kingdom (UK) Government

More information

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX SANTE/10893/2018 Rev. 1 [ ](2018) XXX draft COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX amending Annexes II, III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament

More information

ASSESSING ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING SUBSTANCES

ASSESSING ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING SUBSTANCES FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR RISK ASSESSMENT ASSESSING ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING SUBSTANCES Handling of risk assessment under different regulations Andreas Hensel How EDs may act - sexual hormones as an example Hypothalamus

More information

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 19 July 2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1271 Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for clofentezine in light

More information

Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for tri-allate in light of confirmatory data

Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for tri-allate in light of confirmatory data TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 12 January 2016 PUBLISHED: 02 February 2016 Outcome of the consultation with Member s, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for tri-allate in light of Abstract

More information

EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the life-cycle of applications for regulated products. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the life-cycle of applications for regulated products. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 22 April 2016 AMENDED: 17 July 2017 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.en-1025 EFSA s Catalogue of support initiatives during the life-cycle of applications for regulated products Abstract

More information

Statement on the Safety Evaluation of Smoke Flavourings Primary Products: Interpretation of the Margin of Safety 1

Statement on the Safety Evaluation of Smoke Flavourings Primary Products: Interpretation of the Margin of Safety 1 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Statement on the Safety Evaluation of Smoke Flavourings Primary Products: Interpretation of the Margin of Safety 1 EFSA Panel on Food Contact Material, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing

More information

Nickel : one of the strongest documented metal

Nickel : one of the strongest documented metal Overview on Regulatory Issues with relevance for nickel International Nickel Study Group Environment and Economic Committee Meeting Lisbon April 12, 2011 Nickel : one of the strongest documented metal

More information

BACKGROUND + GENERAL COMMENTS

BACKGROUND + GENERAL COMMENTS Response on behalf of Sobi (Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB) to the European Commission s Public Consultation on a Commission Notice on the Application of Articles 3, 5 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No. 141/2000

More information