fusion ACCF cervical spondylotic myelopathy CSM artificial cervical disc replacement ACDR Hybrid 10% ~ 15% 1 40 ~ 60 1

Transcription

1 R A DOI: /j.cnki.sgkz cervical spondylotic myelopathy CSM artificial cervical disc replacement ACDR Hybrid 10% ~ 15% 1 40 ~ 60 MRI 1 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACDF ACDF 2 3 Cage anterior cervical discectomy and fusion anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion ACCF ACDF Cage Livak KJ Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 -Delta Delta C T Method J. Methods Bermardeau C Bucki B Liote F. Acute arthritis after intrarticular hyaluronate injection onset of effusions without crystal J. AnnRheum Dis Wisnieskih G Naime D Hua JC et al. TSG-6 a glycoprotein associated with arthritis and it s ligand hyaluronan exert opposite effect in a murine model of inflammation J. Pflugers Arch Suppl 2 R225-R Peyron JG Balazs EA. Preliminary clinical assessment of Ne-hyaluronate injection into human arthritic joints J. Pathol Biol American college of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hehipand knee J. Arthritis Rheum Marshall KW. Viscosupple men tation for osteoarthritis. Current status unresolve and fenturedireetion J. Rheamatol Tuddenham L Wheeler G Ntounia-Fousara S et al. The cartilage specific microrna-140 targets histone deacetylase 4 in mouse cells J. FEBS Letters Johann K Eberhart Xinjun He Mary E Swartz et al. MicroRNA Mirn140 modulates Pdgf signaling during palatogenesis J. Nature Genetics Miyaki S Sato T Inoue A et al. MicroRNA-140 plays dual roles in both cartilage development and homeostasis J. Genes Dev

2 1108 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics Vol. 20 No. 12 Dec ACCF a Hilibrand % ~ 3. 0% 2 /3 ACCF b ACCF Tortolani 9 2% ~ 67% /2 Zero-P c ACCF Cage ACCF Caspar Scholz 15 Zero-P Cage Yang 16 Zero-P 20 a 60 b Caspar 2002 Goffin 20 Bryan 1 2 ACDF mm 17 c Cepoiu-Maitin d 18 Zero-P C 2 ~ 3 C 3 ~ 4 Zero-P 19 ACDF ACDF anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion ACCF 3 artificial cervical disc replacement ACDR ACDF Mummaneni 25 ACDR adjacent segment degeneration ASD ACDF 26 heterotopic ossification HO 27 HO

3 % ~ 79. 2% Bryan 8 48% HO 78% 28 HO C 5 HO Matsumoto 36 ASD 64 ASD Jawahar ASD Robertson 30 2 ACDF ACDR ACDF ASD ACDR ACCF ACDR ACDR ASD ASD 31 HO ASD 18 HyBrid ACDF /ACCF 24 ~ 30 HyBrid 32 a60 b HyBrid c 1 ~ 2 d ACDF ACDF e 3 50% f ACDR 5 ACDR ACDR 33 Yi Bryan Hacker a Bryan b c 1. d J ACDR 2 Korinth MC. Treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease current status and trends J. Zentralbl Neurochir Matz PG Ryken TC Groff MW et al. Techniques for 4 HyBrid anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy J. J Neurosurg Spine Fujibayashi S Neo M Nakamura T. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc hermation sequential changes in cage subsidence J. J Clin Neurosci HyBrid

4 1110 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics Vol. 20 No. 12 Dec Moon HJ Kim JH. The effects of anterior cervical dis- 19. cectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes J J. Acta Neurochir Goffin J Casey A Kehr P et al. Preliminary clinical ex- 6 Anderson DG Albert TJ. Bone grafting implants and perience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis J. plating options for anterior cervical fusions J. Orthop Neurosurgery Clin North Am Zhao YB Sun Y Chen ZQ et al. Application of cervical 7 B hler J Gaudemak T. Anterior plate stabilization for arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc long-term X-ray fracturedislocations of the lower cervical spine J. J and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results J. Trauma Chin Med J Engl Hilibrand AS Carison GD Palumbo MA et al. Radicu- 22 Goffin J van Loon J Van Calenbergh F et al. A clinical lopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site analysis of 4 and 6 year follow-up results after cervical of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis J. J Bone disc replacement suigery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Joint Surg Am Prosthesis J. J Neurosurg Spine Tortolani PJ Cunningham BW Vigna F et al. A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical 23 Walraevens J Demaerel P Suetens P et al. Longitudi plate surgery and cervical disc replacement a cadaveric nal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after study J. J Spinal Disord Tech treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the 317. Bryan Cervical Disc J. Neurosurgery Bazaz R Lee MJ Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after Cepoiu-Martin M Faris P Lorenzetti D et al. Artificial anterior cervical spine surgery a prospective study J. cervical Disc Arthroplasty a systematic review J. Spine Spine Phila Pa Pitzen TR Chrobok J Stulik J et al. Implant complica- 25 Mummaneni PV Burkus JK Haid RW et al. Clinical tions fusions loss of lordosis and outcome after anterior and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates two-year compared with allograft fusion a randomized controlled results of a multi-centric randomized controlled study clinical trial J. J Neurosurg Spine J. Spine Pfirrmann CW Metzdorf A Zanetti M et al. Magnetic 26 Pickett GE Sekhon LH Sear WR et al. Complication resonance classification of lumbar inervertebral disc degeneration J. Spine with cervical arthroplasty J. J Neurosurg Spine Tortolani PJ Cunningham BW Vigna F et al. A com- 27 Mehren C Suchomel P Grochulla F et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc reparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement a cadaveric placement a prospective multicenter clinical trial J. study J. J Spinal Disord Tech Spine Phila Pa Quan GM Vital JM Hansen S et al. Eight-year clinical 14 Lee MJ Bazaz R Furey CG et al. Influence of anterior and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty J. Spine Phila Pa cervical plate design on dysphagia a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study J. J Spinal Disord Tech Jawahar A Cavanaugh DA Kerr EJ 3rd et al. Total disc 15 Scholz M Schnake KL Pingel A et al. A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody segment degeneration in cervical spine results of 93 pa- arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent fusion J. Clin Orthop Relat Res tients in three prospective randomized clinical trials 673. J. Spine J Yang JY Song HS Lee M et al. Adjacent level ossifica- 30 Robertson JT Papadopoulos SM Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated tion development after anterior cervical fusion without plate fixation J. Spine Philapa with cervical fusion or arthroplasty a prospective 2-year study J. J Spinal Disord Tech J. 31. J Bryan J J

5 R A % ~ 100% AO Riseborough Milch Matta AO A B C a 24 3 AO h AO C2 C3 A 38. 7% B 24. 1% C 37. 2% b 2. 1 Morrey 33. Bryan 36 Matsumoto M Okada E Ichhara D et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent seg- 34 Yi S Shin HC Kim KN et al. Modified techniques to ment degeneration comparison with asymptomatic vol prevent sagittal imbalance after cervical arthroplasty unteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging fol- J. Spine Phila Pa low-up study J. Spine Hacker B Papadopoulos S Sasso R. Regarding Bryan J. disc related cervical kyphosis J. Spine J