Do Radiologists and Surgeons Speak the Same Language? A Retrospective Review of Facial Trauma
|
|
- Bryce Mathews
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Neuroradiology/Head and Neck Imaging Original Research Ludi et al. Assessing Language in Radiology and Surgery Reports of Facial Trauma Neuroradiology/Head and Neck Imaging Original Research Erica Kristen Ludi 1 Saurabh Rohatgi 2 Matthew E. Zygmont 2 Faisal Khosa 3 Tarek N. Hanna 2 Ludi EK, Rohatgi S, Zygmont ME, Khosa F, Hanna TN Keywords: CT, emergency department, facial, fractures, trauma DOI: /AJR F. Khosa is a 2013 ARRS Scholar. Received November 19, 2015; accepted after revision May 3, Based on a presentation at the Radiological Society of North America 2015 annual meeting, Chicago, IL. F. Khosa is supported by grant 1R56HL from the National Institutes of Health. 1 Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 2 Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Rd, Atlanta, GA Address correspondence to S. Rohatgi (sarohatgi@emory.edu). 3 Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. This article is available for credit. AJR 2016; 207: X/16/ American Roentgen Ray Society Do Radiologists and Surgeons Speak the Same Language? A Retrospective Review of Facial Trauma OBJECTIVE. The objective of the present study is to examine the concordance of facial fracture classifications in patients with trauma who underwent surgery and to assess the epidemiologic findings associated with facial trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients with trauma who underwent facial CT examination and inpatient operative intervention during a 1-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographic characteristics, the mechanism of injury, the radiology report, the surgical diagnosis, and clinical indications were reviewed. s were documented according to bone type and were classified into the following subtypes: LeFort 1, LeFort 2, Le- Fort 3, naso-orbital-ethmoidal, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), orbital, and mandibular. Concordance between the radiology and surgery reports was assessed. RESULTS. A total of 115,000 visits to the emergency department resulted in 9000 trauma activations and 3326 facial CT examinations. One hundred fifty-six patients (4.7%) underwent facial surgical intervention, and 133 cases met criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean injury severity score was 10.2 (range, 1 75). The three most frequently noted injury mechanisms were as follows: assault (77 cases [57.9%]), a traffic accident (21 cases [15.8%]), and a fall (20 cases [15%]). The three most frequently noted facial bone fractures were as follows: mandible (100 cases [75.2%]), maxilla (53 cases [39.8%]), and orbit (53 cases [39.8%]). The five descriptors most frequently found in the radiology and surgery reports were the mandibular angle (25 cases), the orbital floor (25 cases), the mandibular parasymphysis (22 cases), the mandibular body (21 cases), and ZMC fractures (19 cases). A classification was not specified in 31 of the radiologic impressions (22.5%), with 28 of 31 radiologists expecting the surgeon to read the full report. The descriptors used in the radiology and surgery reports matched in 73 cases (54.9%) and differed in 51 cases (38.3%). No classifications were used by one or both specialties in nine cases (6.8%). CONCLUSION. For 38.3% of patients needing facial surgery, descriptors used in the radiologic and surgery reports differed. Speaking a common language can potentially improve communication between the radiology and surgery services and can help expedite management of cases requiring surgery. I n 2007, facial fractures accounted for 407,167 emergency department (ED) visits in the United States [1]. The most common fracture types were closed nasal, orbital, malar, maxillary, and mandible fractures [1]. The number of cases of facial trauma requiring hospitalization from 1990 to 2011 was 2.23 million, with the number increasing over the past decade [2]. However, the percentage of facial fractures that underwent inpatient operative repair decreased between 1996 and 2006, likely as a result of improved detection and accurate categorization of clinically insignificant fractures [3]. Physical examination is generally insufficient to accurately classify facial injuries resulting from superficial soft-tissue swelling and inaccessibility of the deep midface. Imaging is critical for the surgeon to understand all involved anatomic structures and to appropriately plan the surgical approach and intraoperative technique [4, 5]. CT is the reference standard for facial imaging, and it can accurately detect and characterize surgically important injuries [4]. In addition to various classifications for facial fractures and injury patterns, including the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), LeFort, and naso-orbital-ethmoidal (NOE) 1070 AJR:207, November 2016
2 Assessing Language in Radiology and Surgery Reports of Facial Trauma fracture classifications, localizing descriptors for mandibular and orbital fractures also exist (Fig. 1). A familiarity with anatomic descriptors and classification schemes is optimal for diagnosis and efficient communication. The radiologist s interpretation of the CT scan plays an important role in presurgical planning for patients with facial trauma. However, it can be difficult for the radiologist to know which fractures are the most critical for the surgeon, and a difference in terminology used between specialties has the potential to create communication gaps [4]. In the present study, we examine concordance between the radiology and surgery reports of patients with facial trauma who were undergoing operative repair and assess whether the radiology reports used a standardized classification system for facial trauma. A secondary aim of the present study is to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics of facial fracture at our institution. Materials and Methods The present study was approved by the institutional review board at Emory University and is HIPAA compliant. The study was conducted at an urban level I trauma center where approximately 110,000 ED visits occur annually, resulting in 9000 trauma activations. Consecutive trauma activations occurring over 1 year (January 2013 through December 2013) were eligible for inclusion in the present study if they involved facial fractures resulting from trauma and required operative repair of these facial fractures. The exclusion criterion was patient age younger than 16 years. Patients with facial fractures that did not undergo surgical repair were excluded from the study. Data were obtained from the trauma registry. Information on demographic and clinical characteristics was gathered from the registry and included patient age and sex, the mechanism of trauma, the injury severity score [6], the facial surgical procedure performed, and the date of discharge from the hospital. Facial examinations were performed in accordance with institutional protocol, with the use of either a 64-MDCT system (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare) or a 16-MDCT system (Brilliance, Philips Healthcare). Imaging parameters for both systems included helical acquisition at a fixed tube current of 180 ma and a tube voltage of 120 kv. Unenhanced facial CT examinations were obtained caudal to cephalad with the use of the 64-MDCT system, in axial soft-tissue reconstruction at 2.5-mm thickness, with axial, sagittal, and coronal bone filter-reformatted images acquired at thicknesses of 0.625, 1.25, and 1.25 mm, respectively. Coronal soft-tissue reformatted images were also created at a slice thickness of 2.5 mm. Correlating series were performed using the 16-MDCT system at slice thicknesses of 0.6, 1.2, and 3 mm because of differences in detector configuration. Three-dimensional reformatting capability was available on a PACS workstation (isite, Intellispace PACS Enterprise , Philips Healthcare) on a per-patient basis via use of a thin client portal application (IntelliSpace PACS Enterprise with isyntax 4.4, Philips Healthcare). Three-dimensional postprocessing was not used routinely in the radiology workflow of the ED. Data collected from the surgical notes involved preoperative and postoperative diagnoses, clinical indications, and findings. A numeric coding system was used to categorize the fractures. A C D Fig year-old man with facial fracture caused by trauma. A, Three-dimensional CT image shows LeFort I floating palate fracture (green line), LeFort II pyramidal fracture (blue line), and LeFort III craniofacial disjunction fracture (red line) pattern. B, Three-dimensional CT image shows zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture pattern (lateral and inferior orbital rim, zygomatic arch, and maxillary sinus walls) (red lines). C, Three-dimensional CT image shows naso-orbital-ethmoidal fractures (red lines) involving frontal process of maxilla and medial orbital rim. D, Three-dimensional CT image shows the following mandibular and orbital fracture subtypes: symphyseal (red line), parasymphyseal (orange line), body (light yellow line), angle (dark green line), ramus (dark blue line), condylar or subcondylar (purple line), and coronoid process (black line) fractures. Also seen are orbital floor (light green line), medial wall (light blue line), roof (pink line), and lateral wall (dark yellow line) fractures. With the help of an associate investigator, two boardcertified fellowship-trained attending physicians reviewed all charts and made direct comparisons between the full radiology and surgery reports. s were identified from the radiology reports and were categorized as the following types: mandible, maxilla, nasal complex (including nasal bones, nasal process of maxilla, and nasal septum), orbital wall, zygoma (or zygomatic arch), pterygoid plates, ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal bone, or other facial fracture. types included isolated fractures and those that involved fractures of multiple bones in combination. Mandible fractures were further subclassified as symphyseal, parasymphyseal, body, ramus, angle, condylar or subcondylar, or coronoid process fractures. B AJR:207, November
3 Ludi et al. TABLE 1: Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With d Bones, as Indicated in the Radiology Report Characteristic Mandible Maxilla Orbital wall fractures were classified as follows: orbital floor, medial wall, lateral wall, or orbital roof fractures. The fracture subtype classifications used were LeFort 1, LeFort 2, LeFort 3, NOE, and ZMC, in addition to the different subtypes of orbital and mandibular fractures. Continuous variables were summarized with the use of descriptive statistics, such as range, mean, and median values. Categoric variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Data were analyzed using spreadsheet software (Excel 2010, Microsoft) and statistical software (SPSS, version 22, SPSS-IBM). Results During the 1-year study, approximately 115,000 ED visits resulting in more than 9000 trauma activations occurred. A total of 3326 facial CT examinations were performed, and 156 patients (4.7%) underwent facial surgical intervention. Nineteen patients had examinations performed at an outside institution, but no internal interpretation of those examinations was available; three patients did not have mention of a surgery on file; and one patient did not have a final radiology report. Twenty-three cases were therefore excluded from the present study. A total of 133 cases met the study criteria (Fig. 2). Clinical Characteristics The mean age of the patients was 34.3 years (range, years). A total of 115 of the patients (86.5%) were male patients. The mean injury severity score for the cohort was 10.2 (range, 1 75). The mean length of hospital stay was 8.0 days (range, 1 77 days). The mechanisms of injury are presented in Figure 3. Nasal Complex Orbital Zygomatic Pterygoid Epidemiologic Findings According to the Full Radiology Report The most frequently fractured facial bone that required surgical intervention was the mandible (100/133 cases [75.2%]). The maxilla was fractured in 53 patients (39.8%). Orbital fractures also occurred with the same frequency (53/133 [39.8%]). Nasal complex fractures were seen in 48 patients (36.1%), followed by zygomatic (33 patients [24.8%]), pterygoid (27 patients [20.3%]), ethmoid (24 patients [18.0%]), sphenoid (13 patients [9.8%]), and frontal bone (11 patients [8.2%]) fractures (Table 1). Classification of s in Radiology and Surgery Reports When radiology and surgery reports were directly compared, the most frequently reported descriptors of fracture were mandibular angle (25/133 [18.8%]), orbital floor (25/133 [18.8%]), mandibular parasymphysis (22/133 [16.5%]), mandibular body (21/133 [15.8%]), and ZMC (19/133 [14.3%]) fractures (Table 2). Classification Concordance and Discordance For 38 reports (28.6%), the classification on the surgery report and the radiology report matched exactly. In 35 comparisons (26.3%), the same classifications were reported, with additional fractures identified and described on the radiology report. For example, in multiple cases, the radiologist and the surgeon both reported mandibular classifications, but the radiologist identified and classified orbital bone fractures. In two cases, no classification was specified in either report. Therefore, there were 73 patients (54.9%) for Ethmoid Sphenoid Frontal Bone Other Facial Bone Total no. (%) of fractures 100 (75.2) 53 (39.8) 48 (36.0) 53 (39.8) 33 (24.8) 27 (20.3) 24 (18) 13 (9.8) 11 (8.2) 14 (10.5) Patient sex Male Female Injury mechanism Assaulted or struck Traffic Fall Gunshot wound Pedestrian Note Except where otherwise indicated, data are number of fractures. whom classification schemes both were used and matched well between the radiology and surgery reports (Fig. 4). Classifications differed for 58 cases (43.6%). For seven cases, discordance occurred because classification was absent in the surgery report. Among the 51 reports that included classifications but differed, mandibular and orbital subtypes were discordant in 35 (26.3%). An example of discordance was 115,000 Emergency department visits 9000 Trauma activations 3326 Facial CT imaging 156 Patients with facial surgery during admission to the hospital 23 Patients excluded 133 Patients included for chart review Fig. 2 Flow diagram of selection of patients for inclusion in study AJR:207, November 2016
4 Assessing Language in Radiology and Surgery Reports of Facial Trauma TABLE 2: Patterns and Distribution for 133 Cases of Facial Caused by Trauma Classification No. (%) of s LeFort I 3 (2.3) LeFort II 5 (3.8) LeFort III 4 (3.0) Naso-orbital-ethmoidal 6 (4.5) Zygomaticomaxillary complex 19 (14.3) Orbital wall classifications Orbital floor 25 (18.8) Medial orbital wall 2 (1.5) Lateral orbital wall 1 (0.8) Orbital roof 1 (0.8) Mandibular classifications Symphysis 5 (3.8) Parasymphysis 22 (16.5) Mandibular body 21 (15.8) Mandibular ramus 5 (3.8) Mandibular angle 25 (18.8) Condylar or subcondylar 13 (9.8) Coronoid 1 (0.8) Note Data include classifications that could be reconstructed from the radiology report. Numbers will not add up to 100% as some cases involved more than one time of fracture. a case for which the radiologist reported fractures of the mandibular ramus, angle, and coronoid process but for which the surgeon reported operating on a mandibular condyle fracture. For 16 of the 51 reports, the surgeon specified a classification in the surgery report, but the radiologist failed to classify the fracture. In those cases, reconstruction of the report was possible on the basis of the impression section of nine reports, but review of the full radiology report was required in seven cases. In three reports, the radiologist described a LeFort fracture, but the surgeon reported a ZMC fracture. In one case, the surgeon classified the fracture (a ZMC fracture) without mentioning all of the corresponding fractures mentioned in the full radiology report (Table 3). A classification was not specified in the impression section of 31 radiology reports (23.3%). Among 28 of these 31 reports (i.e., 21.1% of all 133 cases), the radiologist expected the surgeon to read the full report. The language used in these impressions included the following phrases: fractures as described above, refer to report above, or other fractures as detailed above. Three of 31 impressions reported individual bone fractures that were not included in the classification system (Fig. 5). Discussion CT is currently the reference standard for characterizing surgical maxillofacial injuries [4]. During acute trauma assessment, the radiologist is usually the primary specialist interpreting these injuries. Accurate interpretation and, potentially just as important, clear communication of the findings facilitate appropriate care of these patients [7, 8]. Some practices are incorporating the use of new technology in radiology, such as advanced 3D image postprocessing with mirror modeling and virtual surgical repair [9]. The advocacy of a multidisciplinary effort lends support to the idea that clear communication in radiology reports adds value and clearly directs care. However, data showing improved outcomes with the implementation of standardized reporting are lacking [10]. Radiology has been advocating for the use of structured reporting for some time and lauds the value of such efforts for the improvement in quality and consistency of patient care [11]. The present study shows that the reporting of facial fractures at our institution can be quite heterogeneous. Implementation of standard nomenclature, especially one developed in concert with all stakeholders, could improve patient care. In our experience, radiologists expected the surgeon to read the full radiology report in 21.1% of cases (28/133), instead of including the fracture classifications in the impression section of the report. With time pressures and work constraints, the surgeon may view the impression section only in addition to reviewing the images themselves. In the future, reporting could be improved by including fracture classifications in the impression section. In addition, in 26.3% of cases (35/133), classification differed in the description of mandibular or orbital fractures. The present study found both true inconsistencies and variation in the subjective descriptors evaluated in our review. For example, the radiologist identified medial wall and roof fractures, but the surgeon described operating on an orbital floor fracture. Alternatively, the surgeon described operating on a parasymphyseal mandibular fracture, whereas a mandibular body fracture was described in the radiology report. Similarly, there were times that the radiologist identified a mandibular body fracture but the surgeon reported a mandibular angle fracture. Given the differing anatomic location of the fractures, the approach used by the surgeon (i.e., intraoral versus submental) could differ and may affect the need for multiple incisions [12]. Other discrepancies include the radiologist classifying a LeFort fracture but the surgeon reporting a ZMC fracture. Similarly, the radiologist may simply classify orbital floor, medial wall, and mandibular body fractures, but the surgeon may classify LeFort or NOE complex fractures. When one refers back to the radiology report, there is a need to view the whole report to rebuild the LeFort or NOE classification. classifications and more streamlined organization within the impression section of the radiology report could help make the communication between specialties more cohesive. Moreover, the number of terms that can be used to describe anatomic fracture locations can be confusing. Descriptors such as paramedian, parasymphysis, parasymphyseal, and right versus left of midline could all be used to describe the same mandibular fracture. Sometimes, a fracture was described in relation to a tooth number by one specialty, whereas the corresponding surgical or radiology report included a mandibular anatomic descriptor. For orbital fractures, the language TABLE 3: Discordance in Classification in 51 Reports of Facial Caused by Trauma Category of Discordance No. of Reports Mandible or orbital subclassification difference 35 Surgeon classification with need to view full report to reconstruct and classify radiologically 7 Surgeon classification with reconstruction possible from impression 9 LeFort and zygomaticomaxillary fracture classification difference 3 Surgeon classification without classifying fracture mentioned in radiologic report 1 Note Three patients had discordance noted in multiple categories. AJR:207, November
5 Ludi et al. 15% 16% 8% 4% 58% of orbital blowout fracture versus orbital floor could be confusing. For the sake of our study, these minor language discrepancies were counted as concordant; however, consistency in language may smooth the transfer of fracture information from radiologist to surgeon. We would like to highlight two instances of radiologic-surgical discordance. First, for one patient, the radiologist reported fractures of the mandibular ramus, angle, and coronoid process, but the surgeon reported operating on a mandibular condyle fracture. Second, for three cases, the radiologist described a LeFort fracture, but the surgeon reported a ZMC fracture. It is unclear to what extent variations in reporting have on the outcomes and efficiency of patient care. Complex midfacial fracture patterns do not always fit cleanly into one pattern of injury. It is possible to have a ZMC fracture and components of a LeFort II fracture and to describe the pattern as a complex LeFort III fracture. If the surgical reporting was correct, these discrepancies could have resulted in improper presurgical planning, suboptimal skin incision, and even longer surgical time because of unexpected intraoperative findings. If the radiology reporting was correct, these cases could have resulted in inadequate treatment and poor outcomes. Although the clinical effect of these discrepancies was outside the scope of this study, we believe that it would be a fruitful area for further research. Similarly, the quality of the interpretation of the radiology report can be improved. Strategies at the systems level include checklists for facial trauma and structured reports and consistency. Individual performance metrics can be applied, including peer review, standardized training with procedural competency courses, integrated surgical conferences for feedback, and judicial management of deficient performances [13]. Assault (n = 77) Traffic accident (n = 21) Fall (n = 20) Gunshot wound (n = 10) Pedestrian (n = 5) Fig. 3 Pie chart of mechanism of injury for 133 cases of facial fracture caused by trauma. Traffic accident category includes motor vehicle collisions and motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle, and bicycle accidents. Quality improvement efforts can serve to enhance the dialogue that takes place between the radiology service and the clinical service, because the surgical services often review imaging independently of the radiologist. classification is important for standardization and universality within and across specialties. These classifications reliably help clinicians in many fields communicate findings, compare results, make treatment decisions, and effectively plan surgical approaches [14 18]. They convey much information in a succinct, shorthand fashion, which can be a large asset in a busy highvolume trauma center [14, 19]. Specifically, with regard to classification of maxillofacial fractures, benefits include identification of midface and upper face fracture patterns that can be associated with mortality predictions and recognition of occult intracranial brain injury [20, 21]. Consistent and accurate use of classification systems could lead to earlier identification and better management of high-risk facial fracture patterns [20]. A greater effort should be made to develop consensus and use a universal language across specialties managing the same patients care. Most of the patients in the present study were male (86.5%), which is consistent with the well-known preponderance of male patients among those with trauma ( % of cases) [22 28]. The mean age of patients in our cohort was 34.3 years, which is similar to prior studies in which the mean age ranged from 24.6 to 51.0 years [24, 29 32]. In the present study, the most frequent injury types were those caused by assault (57.9%), a traffic accident (15.8%), or a fall (15%). Similarly, studies by Lee [33] and Bakardjiev and Pechalova [34] identified assault as the most common injury mechanism, occurring in 44% and 61% of the patients in their cohorts, respectively [33, 34]. Conversely, a study by Sohns et al. [30] from 2013 reported that the mechanism of injury category with the highest frequency was falls (46%), followed by traffic accidents (28%) and violence (15%). We theorize that our younger urban study population was potentially more prone to engaging in risk-taking behavior and violence, compared with the older population studied by Sohns et al., which had a mean age of 51 years. The fracture pattern is an important characteristic to consider in patients with trauma. In the present study, the most commonly fractured bone was the mandible (75.2%), followed by the maxilla and the orbit, which occurred with the same frequency (39.8%). Similar to our results, the results of a study by Lee [33] identified mandibular fractures as the most common fracture pattern, occurring at a rate of 45.5%. A study by Vande- Griend et al. [2] reported that the three most common facial fractures requiring surgical intervention were mandible (41.6%), malar bone (15.2%), and maxilla (6.4%) fractures. In contrast to our study, a study by Allareddy et al. [1] found that among all patients presenting to the ED, closed nasal bone fractures occurred most frequently (55.8%), followed by malar and maxillary closed fractures (13.4%). In their study, VandeGriend and colleagues reported that the most frequent fractures encountered overall, irrespective of their need for operative intervention, involved the nasal bone (30.1%), the mandible (22.7%), and the orbital floor (15.7%). Differences in reported fracture rates appear to be related to inclusion criteria, because the studies by both VandeGriend and colleagues and Allareddy and colleagues included all patients entering the ED, contrary to the present 2 Cases with no classification given in either report 38 Cases with an exact match between surgical and radiology report 75 Concordant cases 35 Cases with additional fractures noted on radiology report Fig. 4 Classification concordance in radiology and surgical reports AJR:207, November 2016
6 Assessing Language in Radiology and Surgery Reports of Facial Trauma 102 Cases with classification noted in the impression 133 Cases with full radiology reports reviewed 28 Cases with expectation for surgeon to read full report study, which included only patients requiring inpatient surgery. Limitations The present study is limited by the fact that the cases evaluated were from a single level I trauma center. To begin with, the high prevalence of assault and mandibular fractures is likely representative of our specific urban setting. In addition, the study is retrospective in nature and a small number of patients were included in the final dataset. The study population was limited to patients undergoing surgery after admission to the hospital for trauma. We did not include patients who were referred for delayed surgery (e.g., patients who went home but then returned to undergo outpatient surgery). The fractures and injury mechanisms identified may be more severe than those communicated in other studies that include patients treated and released or patients who undergo outpatient surgery. The present study also did not include patients with minor injuries who did not seek medical attention or, on the opposite extreme, patients who died before undergoing surgery. With regard to classification discrepancies, it is possible that the surgeon may have noted additional fractures during surgery but did not repair them and thus did not include them in their surgery report. This possibility was generally accounted for in the data analysis but may have affected the orbital and mandible classification discrepancies. 31 Cases with no classification noted in the impression 3 Cases with no classification, only individual bone fractures Fig. 5 Flow diagram of classifications used in radiology reports for 133 cases of facial fracture caused by trauma. Conclusion Facial trauma comprises a significant proportion of ED visits. Limited physical examination, patient cooperation, polytrauma, and significant swelling over the face can conceal major findings and can present a challenge to the trauma surgeon. Accurate interpretation and communication of the findings noted on the CT scan are imperative to successful patient care and treatment. Using a common language and standardizing the nomenclature would improve communication between radiology and surgical services to allow accurate diagnosis and might help to expedite the management of cases requiring surgery. References 1. Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Nalliah RP. Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: VandeGriend ZP, Hashemi A, Shkoukani M. Changing trends in adult facial trauma epidemiology. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: Lee LN, Bhattacharyya N. Contemporary trends in procedural volume for adult facial trauma, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146: Linnau KF, Stanley RB Jr, Hallam DK, Gross JA, Mann FA. Imaging of high-energy midfacial trauma: what the surgeon needs to know. Eur J Radiol 2003; 48: Hopper RA, Salemy S, Sze RW. Diagnosis of midface fractures with CT: what the surgeon needs to know. RadioGraphics 2006; 26: Baker SP, O Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: Wolff J, Sándor GK, Pyysalo M, Miettinen A, Koivumäki AV, Kainulainen VT. Late reconstruction of orbital and naso-orbital deformities. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2013; 25: Mehta N, Butala P, Bernstein MP. The imaging of maxillofacial trauma and its pertinence to surgical intervention. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50: Pierrefeu A, Terzic A, Volz A, Courvoisier D, Scolozzi P. How accurate is the treatment of midfacial fractures by a specific navigation system integrating mirroring computational planning? Beyond mere average difference analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73:315.e1 315.e Sistrom CL, Honeyman-Buck J. Free text versus structured format: information transfer efficiency of radiology reports. AJR 2005; 185: Tran L, Wadhwa A, Mann E. Implementation of structured radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13: Cienfuegos R, Cornelius CP, Ellis E, Kushner G. AO Foundation surgical approaches to mandibular fractures. AO Foundation website. www2.aofoundation. org/wps/portal/surgery?bone=cmf&segment=- Mandible&showPage=approach. Published December 1, Accessed October 6, Mendiratta-Lala M, Eisenberg RL, Steele JR, Boiselle PM, Kruskal JB. Quality initiatives: measuring and managing the procedural competency of radiologists. RadioGraphics 2011; 31: Martin JS, Marsh JL. Current classification of fractures: rationale and utility. Radiol Clin North Am 1997; 35: Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, et al. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 2013; 73: Madhusudan G, Sharma RK, Khandelwal N, Tewari MK. Nomenclature of frontobasal trauma: a new clinicoradiographic classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: Soong CV, Dasari BV, Loan W, et al. Setting the standards for reporting ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010; 44: Rodríguez-Hernández A, Zador Z, Rodríguez- Mena R, Lawton MT. Distal aneurysms of intracranial arteries: application of numerical nomenclature, predilection for cerebellar arteries, and results of surgical management. World Neurosurg 2013; 80: Modhia UM, Dickens AJ, Glezos CD, Gehlert RJ, DeCoster TA. Under-utilization of the OTA Classification in the orthopaedic trauma literature. Iowa Orthop J 2014; 34: Bellamy JL, Mundinger GS, Flores JM, et al. Facial fractures of the upper craniofacial skeleton predict mortality and occult intracranial injury after blunt trauma: an analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24: Audigé L, Cornelius CP, DiIeva A, Prein J, Craniomaxillofacial Classification Group 6. The first AO Classification System for fractures of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton: rationale, methodological background, developmental process, and objectives. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014; 7:S006 S Kraft A, Abermann E, Stigler R, et al. Craniomaxillofacial trauma: synopsis of 14,654 cases with 35,129 injuries in 15 years. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2012; 5: Mourouzis C, Koumoura F. Sports-related maxillofacial fractures: a retrospective study of 125 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: Kühne CA, Krueger C, Homann M, Mohr C, AJR:207, November
7 Ludi et al. Ruchholtz S. Epidemiology and management in emergency room patients with maxillofacial fractures [in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2007; 11: Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Görgün B. Maxillofacial fractures: analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32: Motamedi MH. An assessment of maxillofacial fractures: a 5-year study of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: Mackenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. The National Study on Costs and Outcomes of Trauma. J Trauma 2007; 63:S54 S Bruns J Jr, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia 2003; 44: Ansari MH. Maxillofacial fractures in Hamedan province, Iran: a retrospective study ( ). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004; 32: Sohns JM, Staab W, Sohns C, et al. Current perspective of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients after midface and craniofacial trauma. Clin Imaging 2013; 37: Sethi RK, Kozin ED, Fagenholz PJ, Lee DJ, Shrime MG, Gray ST. Epidemiological survey of head and neck injuries and trauma in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151: Brasileiro BF, Passeri LA. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Brazil: a 5-year prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: Lee KH. Interpersonal violence and facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: Bakardjiev A, Pechalova P. Maxillofacial fractures in Southern Bulgaria: a retrospective study of 1706 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35: FOR YOUR INFORMATION This article is available for CME and Self-Assessment (SA-CME) credit that satisfies Part II requirements for maintenance of certification (MOC). To access the examination for this article, follow the prompts associated with the online version of the article AJR:207, November 2016
Maxillofacial Injuries Practical Tips
Saturday, October 29, 2016 Maxillofacial Injuries Practical Tips Suyash Mohan MD, PDCC THE ROOTS OF PENN RADIOLOGY RADIOLOGICAL Assistant Professor of Radiology Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery Neuroradiology
More informationCT of Maxillofacial Injuries
CT of Maxillofacial Injuries Stuart E. Mirvis, M.D., FACR Department of Radiology University of Maryland School of Medicine Viking 1 1976 MGS 2001 Technology changes the diagnosis Technologic Evolution
More informationCT of Maxillofacial Fracture Patterns. CT of Maxillofacial Fracture Patterns
CT of Maxillofacial Fracture Patterns CT of Maxillofacial Fracture Patterns Stuart E. Mirvis, M.D., FACR Department of Radiology University of Maryland School of Medicine Viking 1 1976 MGS 2001 Technology
More informationComputed-Tomography of maxillofacial fractures: What do surgeons want to know?
Computed-Tomography of maxillofacial fractures: What do surgeons want to know? Poster No.: C-0968 Congress: ECR 2016 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: A. Ammar, M. Jrad, I. KASRAOUI, A. Zoubli, H. Mizouni
More informationThe diagnostic value of Computed Tomography in evaluation of maxillofacial Trauma
The diagnostic value of Computed Tomography in evaluation of maxillofacial Trauma Qais H. Muassa FICMS College of Dentistry, Babylon University Ibrahim S. Gataa, BDS, FICMS College of Dentistry, Sulaimania
More informationJournal of American Science 2015;11(1)
A retrospective study of the epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Ahmed MA Jan 1 ; Mohammed Alsehaimy 1 ; Maisa Al-Sebaei 1 ; Fatima M Jadu 2 1 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department,
More informationMultidetector computed tomographic evaluation of maxillofacial trauma
ORIGINAL ARTICLE ASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Multidetector computed tomographic evaluation of maxillofacial trauma Kaleem Ahmad 1, R. K. Rauniyar 2, Mukesh Kumar Gupta 3, Sajid Ansari 4, Ashok Raj
More informationMulti Detector Computed Tomography Evaluation of Spectrum of Facial Fractures in Motor Vehicle Accidents
Original Article Multi Detector Computed Tomography Evaluation of Spectrum of Facial Fractures in Motor Vehicle Accidents DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2016/20367:2160 Radiology Section Vijay Kumar K R, Bharath B
More informationEmergency Department Visits With Facial Fractures Among Children and Adolescents: An Analysis of Profile and Predictors of Causes of Injuries
CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA Emergency Department Visits With Facial Fractures Among Children and Adolescents: An Analysis of Profile and Predictors of Causes of Injuries Veerasathpurush Allareddy, BDS,
More informationImaging Orbit/Periorbital Injury
Imaging Orbit/Periorbital Injury 9 th Nordic Trauma Radiology Course 2016 Stuart E. Mirvis, M.D., FACR Department of Radiology University of Maryland School of Medicine Fireworks Topics to Cover Struts
More informationMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA. The on-call maxillofacial surgeons can be contacted through the switchboard at the Southern General Hospital
MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA The on-call maxillofacial surgeons can be contacted through the switchboard at the Southern General Hospital Mandibular Injuries Mechanism of injury Assault, falls, RTA-Direct trauma
More informationPattern and Treatment of Facial Trauma in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Pattern and Treatment of Facial Trauma in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Jose Luis Muñante-Cárdenas, DDS, MS, Sergio Olate, DDS, MS, PhD, Luciana Asprino, DDS, MS, PhD, Jose Ricardo
More informationOriginal Research THE USE OF REFORMATTED CONE BEAM CT IMAGES IN ASSESSING MID-FACE TRAUMA, WITH A FOCUS ON THE ORBITAL FLOOR FRACTURES
DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-601 Original Research THE USE OF REFORMATTED CONE BEAM CT IMAGES IN ASSESSING MID-FACE TRAUMA, WITH A FOCUS ON THE ORBITAL FLOOR FRACTURES RALUCA ROMAN 1, MIHAELA HEDEȘIU 1, FLOAREA
More informationMEDICAL CODING FOR FACIAL INJURIES & RECONSTRUCTION
MEDICAL CODING FOR FACIAL INJURIES & RECONSTRUCTION Tirbod Fattahi, MD, DDS, FACS Chief & Associate Professor Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville
More informationUse of Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Revisional Procedures in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Trauma
Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Revisional Procedures in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Trauma The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access
More information(Cover) Preliminary course program AOCMF Principles Course. March 10 March 12, 2014 Nairobi, Kenya
(Cover) Preliminary course program AOCMF Principles Course March 10 March 12, 2014 Nairobi, Kenya AOCMF course program Principles Course, Nairobi, Kenya page 2 of 9 (page 2 do not edit) AOCMF course program
More informationAssessment of maxillofacial trauma in emergency department
Arslan et al. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2014, 9:13 WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Assessment of maxillofacial trauma in emergency department Engin D Arslan 1*,
More informationHEAD & NECK IMAGING. Iranian Journal of Radiology September; 10(3): Published Online 2013 August 30.
Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2013 September; 10(3): 140-7. Published Online 2013 August 30. HEAD & NECK IMAGING 10.5812/iranjradiol.6353 Research Article Identification of Nasal Bone Fractures on Conventional
More informationThickened and thinner parts of the skull = important base for understanding of the functional structure of the skull - the transmission of masticatory
Functional structure of the skull and Fractures of the skull Thickened and thinner parts of the skull = important base for understanding of the functional structure of the skull - the transmission of masticatory
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. Facial Fracture Classification According to Skeletal Support Mechanisms
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Facial Fracture Classification According to Skeletal Support Mechanisms Terry L. Donat, MD; Carmen Endress, MD; Robert H. Mathog, MD Objective: To construct, propose, and evaluate the
More informationThe impact-absorbing effects of facial fractures in closed-head injuries
J Neurosurg66:542-547, 1987 The impact-absorbing effects of facial fractures in closed-head injuries An analysis of 2 l0 patients K. FRANCIS LEE, M.D., LOUS K. WAGNER~ PH.D., Y. EUGENIA LEE, M.D., JUNG
More informationFacial Trauma. Facial Trauma. Facial Trauma
Facial Trauma Facial Trauma Brian Bast DMD, MD Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of California, San Francisco School of Dentistry Brian Bast DMD, MD Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
More informationMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMATOLOGY Department of Maxillofacial Surgery Semmelweis University, Budapest. Dr. Huszár Tamás
MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMATOLOGY Department of Maxillofacial Surgery Semmelweis University, Budapest Dr. Huszár Tamás Maxillofacial injuries isolated maxillofacial injury multiple injuries polytrauma (injury
More informationCurrent concepts in midface fracture management
REVIEW C URRENT OPINION Current concepts in midface fracture management AQ1 Alf L. Nastri and Ben Gurney AQ4 Purpose of review Management of midface trauma is complex and challenging and requires a clear
More informationMaxillofacial Trauma 4 Year prospective study at a tertiary centre in Western Nepal
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Maxillofacial Trauma 4 Year prospective study at a tertiary centre in Western Nepal Rajib Khadka*, Nitesh Kumar Chaurasia** Abstract Purpose: Study was conducted to find the epidemiological
More informationDiagnosis of Midface Fractures with CT: What the Surgeon Needs to Know 1
Note: This copy is for your personal non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, contact us at www.rsna.org/rsnarights. EDUCATION EXHIBIT
More informationTRAUMA TO THE FACE AND MOUTH
Dr.Yahya A. Ali 3/10/2012 F.I.C.M.S TRAUMA TO THE FACE AND MOUTH Bailey & Love s 25 th edition Injuries to the orofacial region are common, but the majority are relatively minor in nature. A few are major
More informationClinical Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Facial Radiography in Facial Trauma Patients at the Emergency Department
Chin J Radiol 2005; 30: 327-333 327 Clinical Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Facial Radiography in Facial Trauma Patients at the Emergency Department PI-YUN CHIU 1 JEN-DAR CHEN 1,2 PING-YI KO 1 CHENG-YEN
More informationAO COIAC COmprehensive Injury Automatic Classifier. Craniomaxillofacial Fracture Classification Module
AO COIAC COmprehensive Injury Automatic Classifier Software for the classification and documentation of injuries User Manual Version 4.0.0 Craniomaxillofacial Fracture Classification Module Audigé L.,
More informationCore Curriculum Syllabus Emergencies in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery FACIAL FRACTURES
Core Curriculum Syllabus Emergencies in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery A. General Considerations FACIAL FRACTURES Look for other fractures like skull and/or cervical spine fractures Test function
More informationBones of the skull & face
Bones of the skull & face Cranium= brain case or helmet Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. The cranium is composed of eight bones : frontal Occipital
More informationEpidemiology 3002). Epidemiology and Pathophysiology
Epidemiology Maxillofacial trauma or injuries are commonly encountered in the practice of emergency medicine and are presenting one of the most challenging problems to the attending surgeons or physicians
More informationDiagnostic performance of brain computed tomography to detect facial bone fractures
Clin Exp Emerg Med 2018;5(2):107-112 https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.17.223 Diagnostic performance of brain computed tomography to detect facial bone fractures Duk Ho Kim 1, Yoon Hee Choi 1, Seong Jong Yun
More informationA New Classification of Zygomatic Fracture Featuring Zygomaticofrontal Suture: Injury Mechanism and a Guide to Treatment
IBIMA Publishing Plastic Surgery: An International Journal http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/psij/psij.html Vol. 2013 (2013), Article ID 383486, 6 pages DOI: 10.5171/2013.383486 Research Article
More informationJMSCR Vol 04 Issue 08 Page August 2016
www.jmscr.igmpublication.org Impact Factor 5.244 Index Copernicus Value: 83.27 ISSN (e)-2347-176x ISSN (p) 2455-0450 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v4i8.54 Spectrum of Mandibular Fractures in Motor
More informationMcHenry Western Lake County EMS System Paramedic, EMT-B and PHRN Optional Continuing Education 2019 #1 Facial Trauma
McHenry Western Lake County EMS System Paramedic, EMT-B and PHRN Optional Continuing Education 2019 #1 Facial Trauma The face is vital to human appearance and function. Facial injuries can impair a patient
More informationThe Prevalence and Distribution of. Combination Fractures in the Mandible. Dr. A Mohamed
The Prevalence and Distribution of Combination Fractures in the Mandible Researcher: Dr. AS Singh Supervisor: Prof. MMR Bouckaert Co Supervisors: Dr. C Masureik Dr. A Mohamed DECLARATION I, Dr. A.S. Singh
More informationMidface fractures; what the radiologist should know.
Midface fractures; what the radiologist should know. Poster No.: C-1056 Congress: ECR 2013 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: J. Garcia Villanego, E.-M. Heursen, A. Rodriguez Piñero; Cadiz/ES Keywords:
More informationAssessment of Relapse Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Mandibular Setback and Short-term Immobilization
Assessment of Relapse Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Mandibular Setback and Short-term Immobilization Koroush Taheri Talesh, DDS, a Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi, DDS, b Mahdi Sazavar,
More informationFacial and Temporal Bone Trauma Diagnostic imaging and therapeutic challenges in emergency
Facial and Temporal Bone Trauma Diagnostic imaging and therapeutic challenges in emergency ATTYE A, KRAINIK A Department of Neuroradiology and MRI University Hospital Grenoble / University Grenoble Alpes
More informationThe treatment of malocclusion after open reduction of maxillofacial fracture: a report of three cases
CASE REPORT http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms..40.2.91 pissn 2234-7550 eissn 2234-5930 The treatment of malocclusion after open reduction of maxillofacial fracture: a report of three cases Sung-Suk Lee,
More informationConventional radiograph verses CT for evaluation of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle
Case Report: Conventional radiograph verses CT for evaluation of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle Dr Anjali Wadhwa, Dr Gaurav Shah, Dr Shweta Sharma, Dr Anand Bhatnagar, Dr Pallavi Malaviya NIMS
More informationPediatric Craniofacial Injuries: Concept of Treatment
Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 83, No. 1, March: 217-224, 201 5 www.medicaljournalofcairouniversity.net Pediatric Craniofacial Injuries: Concept of Treatment FAWZY T. AL-SAYED, Ph.D.* and MOHAMAD A. SHOEIB,
More informationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Privileges REAPPOINTMENT Effective from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016
Initial privileges (initial appointment) Renewal of privileges (reappointment) All new applicants must meet the following requirements as approved by the Health Authority or Hospital, effective: 11/Dec/2014.
More informationMaxillofacial and Ocular Injuries
Maxillofacial and Ocular Injuries Objectives At the conclusion of this presentation the participant will be able to: Identify the key anatomical structures of the face and eye and the impact of force on
More informationAn Analysis of Maxillofacial Fractures: A 5-Year Survey of 157 Patients
MILITARY MEDICINE, 169, 9:723, 2004 An Analysis of Maxillofacial Fractures: A 5-Year Survey of 157 Patients Guarantor: Kerim Ortakoğlu, DDS PhD Contributors: Kerim Ortakoğlu, DDS PhD* ; Yılmaz Günaydin,
More informationFacial Trauma ASHNR. Disclosures: Acknowledgments: None. Edward P. Quigley, III, MD PhD University of Utah
Disclosures: Facial Trauma ASHNR Edward P. Quigley, III, MD PhD University of Utah None Acknowledgments: Dr. Rebecca Cornelius Dr. Ilona M. Schmalfuss Dr. Richard Wiggins III Dr. Yoshimi Anzai Dr. Lindell
More informationFacial skeletal fractures are common,
CE This symbol indicates that there is more content in the online version of this article. Computed Tomography of Facial Fractures Bryant Furlow, BA Facial skeletal fractures are common, potentially serious,
More informationThe Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Radiological Issues and Systematic Approach
Tutorial Article S123 The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Radiological Issues and Systematic Approach Carlos H. Buitrago-Téllez, MD 1,2 Carl-Peter Cornelius, MD, DDS 3 Joachim Prein, MD, DDS
More informationISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Ali Mortazavi,
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS) Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2015; 3(4C):1760-1764 Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources)
More informationMaxillary and Periorbital Fractures January 2004
TITLE: Maxillary and Periorbital Fractures SOURCE: Grand Rounds Presentation, UTMB, Dept. of Otolaryngology DATE: January 7, 2004 RESIDENT PHYSICIAN: Gordon Shields, MD FACULTY ADVISOR: Francis B. Quinn,
More informationOriginal Article Factors affecting the outcomes of non-surgical treatment for intracapsular condylar fractures
Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9(6):10847-10855 www.ijcem.com /ISSN:1940-5901/IJCEM0021362 Original Article Factors affecting the outcomes of non-surgical treatment for intracapsular condylar fractures Bao-Li
More informationAnalysis of 809 Facial Bone Fractures in a Pediatric and Adolescent Population
Analysis of 89 Facial Bone Fractures in a Pediatric and Adolescent Population Sang Hun Kim, Soo Hyang Lee, Pil Dong Cho Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University
More informationThe Questionable Utility of Oral Contrast for the Patient with Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
The Questionable Utility of Oral Contrast for the Patient with Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Jonathan Rakofsky, MD PGY3 Henry Ford Hospital Emergency Medicine Program December 2014 All patients
More informationMarcin Czerwinski, MD, PhD, FRCS(C), FACS Reference List Abstract
Abstract The incidence of ocular injuries in isolated orbital fractures. Ho T, Jupiter D, Tsai J, Czerwinski M. 2015 Journal C-arm assisted zygoma fracture repair: a critical analysis of the first 20 cases.
More informationBlindness and severe visual impairment in facial fractures: an 11 year review
British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2002), 55, 1-7 9 2002 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons doi: 10.1054Pojps.2001.3728 BRITISH JOURNAL OF [ ~ ] PLASTIC SURGERY Blindness and severe visual impairment
More informationClinical Evaluation of the Nose: A Cheap and Effective Tool for the Nasal Fracture Diagnosis
Eplasty. 2012; 12: e3. Published online 2012 January 23. PMCID: PMC3266122 Clinical Evaluation of the Nose: A Cheap and Effective Tool for the Nasal Fracture Diagnosis Joaquín Pérez-Guisado, MD, PhD a
More informationAOCMF Course Management of Facial Trauma July 14 15, 2017 Mumbai, India
Program Announcement AOCMF Course Management of Facial Trauma July 14 15, 2017 Mumbai, India Course Director Samir Kumta (Lilavati Hospital, India) Mukul Padhye (D.Y. Patil School Of Dentistry, India)
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. A Novel Technique for Malar Eminence Evaluation Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography
ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Novel Technique for Malar Eminence Evaluation Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Sami P. Moubayed, MD; Frederick Duong, MD; Christian Ahmarani, MD, FRCSC; Akram Rahal, MD, FRCSC
More informationComprehensive AOCMF Classification System. Cornelius CP, Kunz C, Prein J, Audigé L. Mandibular fractures Level-2 system (cases 1 to 18)
Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System Cornelius CP, Kunz C, Prein J, Audigé L Mandibular fractures Level-2 system (cases 1 to 18) Case 1: Body fracture traversing anterior transition zone Imaging:
More informationNorth Oaks Trauma Symposium Friday, November 3, 2017
+ Evaluation and Management of Facial Trauma D Antoni Dennis, MD North Oaks ENT an Allergy November 3, 2017 + Financial Disclosure I do not have any conflicts of interest or financial interest to disclose
More informationAnalysis of the Changing Patterns of Midface Fractures Using 3D Computed Tomography: An Observational Study
Original Article Analysis of the Changing Patterns of Midface Fractures Using 3D Computed Tomography: An Observational Study Preeti Satish, BDS, MDS 1 Kavitha Prasad, BDS, MDS 1 R. M. Lalitha, BDS, MDS
More informationInteresting Case Series. Virtual Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery
Interesting Case Series Virtual Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery Suraj Jaisinghani, MS, a Nicholas S. Adams, MD, b,c Robert J. Mann, MD, b,c,d John W. Polley, MD, b,c,d, and John A. Girotto, MD,
More informationFlexible Easy Competitive. SCANORA 3Dx - The in-office large field-of-view Cone Beam CT system for Head and Neck imaging
Flexible Easy Competitive SCANORA 3Dx - The in-office large field-of-view Cone Beam CT system for Head and Neck imaging SCANORA 3Dx. The solution. SCANORA 3Dx makes advanced 3D imaging easy in the head
More informationFrequency of paediatric facial trauma in a tertiary care dental hospital
International Surgery Journal Khan MA et al. Int Surg J. 2018 Jan;5(1):310-314 http://www.ijsurgery.com pissn 2349-3305 eissn 2349-2902 Original Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175917
More informationMalignant growth Maxilla management an analysis
ISSN: 2250-0359 Volume 3 Issue 2 2013 Malignant growth Maxilla management an analysis *Balasubramanian Thiagarajan *Geetha Ramamoorthy *Stanley Medical College Abstract: Malignant tumors involving maxilla
More informationOriginal Report. The Reverse Segond Fracture: Association with a Tear of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Meniscus
Eva M. Escobedo 1 William J. Mills 2 John. Hunter 1 Received July 10, 2001; accepted after revision October 1, 2001. 1 Department of Radiology, University of Washington Harborview Medical enter, 325 Ninth
More informationDental trauma in association with maxillofacial fractures: an epidemiological study
Dental Traumatology 2015; doi: 10.1111/edt.12176 Dental trauma in association with maxillofacial fractures: an epidemiological study Muhammad Ruslin 1,2, Jan Wolff 2, Paolo Boffano 2, Henk S. Brand 2,3,
More informationExtraoral radiography Introduction: Extraoral radiographs (outside the mouth) are taken when large areas of the skull or jaw must be examined or when
Extraoral radiography Introduction: Extraoral radiographs (outside the mouth) are taken when large areas of the skull or jaw must be examined or when patients are unable to open their mouths for film placement.
More informationOrbital blow-out fractures and race
Orbital blow-out fractures and race D. Julian de Silva, Geoffrey E. Rose Moorfields Eye Hospital, London EC1V 2PD, England. Key Words: orbit, fracture, blow-out, medial wall, orbital floor, race, ethnic
More informationMandibular trauma treatment: A comparison of two protocols
Journal section: Oral Surgery Publication Types: Research doi:10.4317/medoral.20263 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20263 : A comparison of two protocols Paolo Boffano 1, Sofie C. Kommers 1, Fabio
More informationPTERYGOPALATINE FOSSA
PTERYGOPALATINE FOSSA Outline Anatomical Structure and Boundaries Foramina and Communications with other spaces and cavities Contents Pterygopalatine Ganglion Especial emphasis on certain arteries and
More informationCLINICAL STUDY. Surgical Approaches and Fixation Patterns in Zygomatic Complex Fractures
CLINICAL STUDY Surgical Approaches and Fixation Patterns in Zygomatic Complex Fractures Sergio Olate, MS, Sergio Monteiro Lima Jr, DDS, Renato Sawazaki, PhD, Roger Willian Fernandes Moreira, PhD, and Márcio
More informationPediatric CT Protocols (18 years old or less)
Pediatric CT Protocols (18 years old or less) Ped1: Head CT Ped2: Cervical spine CT Ped3: Sinus CT Ped4: Neck CT Ped5: Chest CT Ped6: Abdomen and pelvis CT Ped7: Thoracic or lumbar spine CT Ped8: Extremity
More informationFracture frontal bone and its management
From the SelectedWorks of Balasubramanian Thiagarajan March 1, 2013 Fracture frontal bone and its management Balasubramanian Thiagarajan Available at: https://works.bepress.com/drtbalu/14/ ISSN: 2250-0359
More informationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Privileges
Name: Effective from / / to / / Initial privileges (initial appointment) Renewal of privileges (reappointment) All new applicants should meet the following requirements as approved by the governing body,
More informationAnatomy and Physiology. Bones, Sutures, Teeth, Processes and Foramina of the Human Skull
Anatomy and Physiology Chapter 6 DRO Bones, Sutures, Teeth, Processes and Foramina of the Human Skull Name: Period: Bones of the Human Skull Bones of the Cranium: Frontal bone: forms the forehead and the
More informationExtraoral Radiology October 10th, 2008
Extraoral Radiology October 10th, 2008 Steven R. Singer, DDS srs2@columbia.edu 212.305.5674 November 8 th, 1895 Extraoral Projections Images can be produced in the dental office X-ray source can be Intraoral
More informationComprehensive AOCMF Classification System. Cornelius CP, Kunz C, Prein J, Audigé L. Mandibular fractures Level-3 system (cases 22 to 33)
Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System Cornelius CP, Kunz C, Prein J, Audigé L Mandibular fractures Level-3 system (cases 22 to 33) Case 22: Alvelolar process fracture Imaging: axial CT scan & 3D CT
More informationCervical Spine Injury: A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify High-Risk Patients for Helical CT Screening
Julian A. Hanson 1 C. Craig Blackmore 1,2 Frederick A. Mann 1 Anthony J. Wilson 1 Received July 2, 1999; accepted after revision August 31, 1999. 1 Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, University
More informationRisk factors for maxillofacial injuries in a Brazilian emergency hospital sample
www.scielo.br/jaos Risk factors for maxillofacial injuries in a Brazilian emergency hospital sample José Luiz Rodrigues LELES 1, Ênio José dos SANTOS 2, Fabrício David JORGE 2, Erica Tatiane da SILVA 3,
More informationMeasuring Upper Airway Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Dolphin 3D Software Compared to Manual Segmentation in Craniosynostosis Patients
CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL DEFORMITIES/COSMETIC SURGERY Measuring Upper Airway Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Dolphin 3D Software Compared to Manual Segmentation in Craniosynostosis Patients Valerie R. de
More informationProphylactic Midface Lift in Midfacial Trauma
Rapid Communication 347 Ryan Brown, MD 1 Kirk Lozada, MD 2 Sameep Kadakia, MD 2 Eli Gordin, MD 3 Yadranko Ducic, MD 4 1 Department of Otolaryngology, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado 2 Department of
More informationStructure Location Function
Frontal Bone Cranium forms the forehead and roof of the orbits Occipital Bone Cranium forms posterior and inferior portions of the cranium Temporal Bone Cranium inferior to the parietal bone forms the
More informationNew innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system
LECTURE New innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system Brian Alpert, Rolf Gutwald1 and Rainer Schmelzeisen1 Departments of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Surgical & Hospital Dentistry,
More information2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY
Measure #258: Rate of Open Repair of Small or Moderate Non-Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) without Major Complications (Discharged to Home by Post-Operative Day #7) National Quality Strategy
More informationCranium Facial bones. Sternum Rib
Figure 7.1 The human skeleton. Skull Thoracic cage (ribs and sternum) Cranium Facial bones Sternum Rib Bones of pectoral girdle Vertebral column Sacrum Vertebra Bones of pelvic girdle (a) Anterior view
More informationThe Retrospective Study of Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg ;():- http://dx.doi.org/./jkamprs... ISSN -(Print) ISSN -(Online) Original Article The Retrospective Study of Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture Han-Kyul Park, Jae-Yeol
More informationCase Report. Orthognathic Correction of Class II Open Bite. Using the Piezoelectric System and MatrixORTHOGNATHIC Plating System.
Case Report Orthognathic Correction of Class II Open Bite. Using the Piezoelectric System and MatrixORTHOGNATHIC Plating System. Orthognathic Correction of Class II Open Bite. Using the Piezoelectric System
More informationManagement Strategies for Communited Fractures of Frontal Skull Base: An Institutional Experience
80 Original Article THIEME Management Strategies for Communited Fractures of Frontal Skull Base: An Institutional Experience V. Velho 1 Hrushikesh U. Kharosekar 1 Jasmeet S. Thukral 1 Shonali Valsangkar
More informationAOCMF Course - Management of Facial Trauma August 19-20, 2017 Hyderabad, India
Program Announcement AOCMF Course - Management of Facial Trauma August 19-20, 2017 Hyderabad, India Course Director Vivek Vardhan Reddy (Continental Hospital, Hyderabad. SVS Institute of Dental Sciences,
More informationTitle. Author(s)Matsushita, Kazuhiro; Yamamoto, Hidekazu. CitationBritish journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5. Issue Date
Title Bilateral hypoplasia of the maxillary sinus : swelli Author(s)Matsushita, Kazuhiro; Yamamoto, Hidekazu CitationBritish journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5 Issue Date 2017-04 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/68826
More informationSLLF FOR TMJ CASES IN ADULT DENTITION SEVERE BRACHIFA BRACHIF FACIAL
SLLF FOR TMJ CASES IN ADULT DENTITION SEVERE BRACHIFAFACIAL TMJ: Severe Postural Imbalance+Severe Myofascial Pain Syndrome, severe soreness Temporalis Tendon RL, Sternocleidomastoideus RL Age:39 years
More informationHead and Neck Trauma. Disclosures: Acknowledgments: Introductory case. None
Head and Neck Trauma None Disclosures: Edward P. Quigley III MD PhD Radiology and Imaging Sciences University of Utah Dr. Richard Wiggins III Dr. Yoshimi Anzai Dr. Lindell Gentry Dr. Blair Winegar Dr.
More informationMandibular Dimensional Changes with aging in Three Dimensional Computed Tomographic Study in 21 to 50 Year old Men and Women
Mandibular Dimensional Changes with aging in Three Dimensional Computed Tomographic Study in 21 to 50 Year old Men and Women Original Article Roshanak Ghaffari 1, Abolfath Hosseinzade 2, Hossein Zarabi
More informationKey words: Third molar, Impacted tooth, Tooth Eruption, Molar, Mandible, Unerupted Tooth.
JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2014;4(2):286-290 OPG and CBCT Finding s of an Ectopic Third Molar in the Sub-condylar Region Tatu Joy E 1, Farakath Khan 1, Shameel Mohammed 2 From the Department of Oral Medicine
More informationOlder age, MVC and TBI higher incidence. Facial fractures a distracting injury? Carotid artery injury. Blindness may occur with facial fractures
Dr Donald C. DeLisi Jr Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeon Multisystem injury 20 50% Nasal and mandibular fractures most common in community ED s Midface and zygomatic injuries most common in Trauma centers 25%
More informationAdvances in Emergency Imaging
Hampton Symposium,, October 16 th, 2010 Advances in Emergency Imaging Robert A. Novelline, MD Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School Director of Emergency Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital
More informationB. CT protocols for the spine
B. CT protocols for the spine Poster No.: A-003 Congress: ECR 2010 Type: Invited Speaker Topic: Neuro Authors: B. Tins; Oswestry/UK Keywords: CT, spine, diagnostic imaging protocol DOI: 10.1594/ecr2010/A-003
More informationTwo Hundred Ninety-Four Consecutive Facial Fractures in an Urban Trauma Center: Lessons Learned
CME Two Hundred Ninety-Four Consecutive Facial Fractures in an Urban Trauma Center: Lessons Learned Patrick Kelley, M.D., Marcus Crawford, M.D., Stephen Higuera, M.D., and Larry H. Hollier, M.D. Houston,
More information