American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) foot and ankle scale 632. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) scoring scales 634

Transcription

1 0.4 Ankle Achilles Tendon total Rupture Score (ATRS) 630 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) foot and ankle scale 63 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) scoring scales 634 Ankle activity score 636 American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) anklehindfoot scale 638 Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT) 64 Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS) 644 Anklerating scale 646 Bray ankle evaluation score 648 de Bie ankle sprain function score 650 Ferretti point system 65 Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) 654 Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) 656 Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) sport 658 Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) 660 Freiburg ankle score 66 Good, Jones, and Lingstone grading system of lateral ankle stability 664 Iowa ankle score 666 Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) anklehindfoot scale 668 Karlsson ankle function score

2 0.4 Ankle Karlstrom Olerud ankle score 67 Kumbhare and Basmajian ankle sprain scale 674 Leppilahti Achilles tendon rupture score 676 Kofoed ankle scoring system 678 Linde inflammatory score 680 Liu ankle score 68 Mazur ankle score 684 McComis Achilles tendon rupture score 686 McGuire point system for ankle evaluation 688 Merkel Achilles tendon rupture score 690 Moller ruptured Achilles tendon score 69 Olerud Molander Ankle (OMA) score 694 Performance index 696 Phillips ankle scoring system 698 Sports ankle rating clinical rating score 700 Sports ankle rating quality of life measure 70 Sports ankle rating Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (003) 704 St. Pierre ankle score 706 Takakura ankle score 708 TeenyWiss functional ankle score 70 Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group (VISAA) 7 Weber ankle score 74 69

3 0.4 Ankle. Achilles Tendon total Rupture Score (ATRS) (007) Source: NilssonHelander K, Thomee R, GravareSilbernagel K, et al (007) The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS): development and ation. Am J Sports Med; 35:4 46. Content Type Patientreported outcome Scale 5 subscales (0 items): Items scored on a 0 to 0 point scale. Interpretation Maximum score: 00 points Minimum score: 0 points The higher the score, the greater the disability. Validation Pain and stiffness (0 points) Strength (0 points) Fatigue (0 points) Activities of daily living (0 points) Functional activities (50 points) Outcomes ated against Foot and ankle outcome score Swedish version of Victorian Institute of sports assessmentachilles questionnaire Patient population in Validity Reliability Responsiveness Patients with Achilles tendon rupture (N = 8) (43 years; 77% male) and healthy subjects (N = 5) (4 years; 63% male) [] Patients with Achilles tendon rupture (N = 43) (4 years; 84% male) [] Patients with Achilles tendon rupture (N = 8) (40 years; 8% male) [] Validation study: [] SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL (003) Evaluation of the ity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF36. Foot Ankle Int; 4:

4 . Achilles Tendon total Rupture Score (ATRS) 0.4 Ankle Methodological evaluation (6/6) no score 0 points point points Content ity Validity Construct ity Criterion ity Reliability Internal consistency Reproducibility Responsiveness 6 Clinical utility (4/4) 0 points point points points Patient friendliness Clinician friendliness 4 Total (out of 0) 0 63

5 0.4 Ankle. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) foot and ankle scale (004) Content Source: AAOS Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, et al (004) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, ity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 86A: Type Patientreported outcome Scale 4 subscales (0 items): Pain (45 points) Function (30 points) Stiffness and swelling(0 points) Giving way (5 points) Items scored on a to variable maximum 5 to 7 point scale. Items rescored on a 0 to 5 point scale. Interpretation Scores summed and normalized to 00 for each subscale. Total score then subtracted from 00. Each subscale scored separately. Maximum score: 00 points Minimum score: 0 points The lower the score, the greater the disability. Validation Outcomes ated against [] Physician rating of pain and function SF36 WOMAC Patient population in Validity Reliability Responsiveness Patients with foot or ankle complaints (N = 70) (48 years; 54% male) [] + + Not Validation study: [] Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, et al (004) American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, ity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 86A:

6 . American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) foot and ankle core score 0.4 Ankle Methodological evaluation (6/6) no score 0 points point points Content ity Validity Construct ity Criterion ity Reliability Internal consistency Reproducibility Responsiveness 6 Clinical utility (3/4) 0 points point points points Patient friendliness Clinician friendliness 3 Total (out of 0) 9 633

7 0.4 Ankle 3. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) scoring scales (005) Similar scales for metatarsophalangeal joint/first ray, forefoot, rearfoot, and ankle Source: Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Mendicino RW, et al (005) ACFAS Scoring Scale user guide. J Foot Ankle Surg; 44: Content Type Clinicianbased outcome Scale 5 subscales (9 items): Pain (30 points) Appearance (5 points) Functional capacities (5 points) Radiographic evaluation (8 points) Musculoskeletal (3 points) Items scored on a 0 to variable maximum 5 to 30 point scale. Interpretation Maximum score: 00 points Minimum score: 0 points The lower the score, the greater the disability. Validation No ation studies were identified. Patient population in Validity Reliability Responsiveness Not applicable 634

8 3. American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) scoring scales 0.4 Ankle Methodological evaluation (0/6) no score 0 points point points Content ity Validity Construct ity Criterion ity Reliability Internal consistency Reproducibility Responsiveness Clinical utility (/4) 0 points point points points Patient friendliness Clinician friendliness 0 Total (out of 0) 635

9 0.4 Ankle 4. Ankle activity score (004) Source: Halasi T, Kynsburg A, Tallay A, et al (004) Development of a new activity score for the evaluation of ankle instability. Am J Sports Med; 3: Content Type Patientreported outcome Scale 6 subscales ( activities): Activities assigned a score between 0 and 0. Interpretation Maximum score: 0 points Minimum score: 0 points The lower the score, the greater the disability. Top level (international elite, professional, national team, firstdivision activities) Competitive level Recreational sports No sports, everyday activity Able to walk, but everyday activity Unable to walk Validation Outcomes ated against Tegner score Patient s subjective results Karlsson function score Patient population in Validity Reliability Responsiveness Patients that had undergone ankle surgery for instability (N = 9) (3 years; 40% male) [] Athletes with ankle problems (N = 50) (age NR; sex NR) [] Validation study: [] Halasi T, Kynsburg A, Tallay A, et al (004) Development of a new activity score for the evaluation of ankle instability. Am J Sports Med; 3:

10 4. Ankleactivity score 0.4 Ankle Methodological evaluation (5/6) no score 0 points point points Content ity Validity Construct ity Criterion ity Reliability Internal consistency Reproducibility Responsiveness 5 Clinical utility (3/4) 0 points point points points Patient friendliness Clinician friendliness 3 Total (out of 0) 8 637