Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen. FIN 301 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung (4749a FS2016) Erfasste Fragebögen = 267

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen. FIN 301 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung (4749a FS2016) Erfasste Fragebögen = 267"

Ellen Allen
6 years ago
Views:

1 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung (79a FS06) Erfasste Fragebögen = 67 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Fragetext Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Median Quantil % 0% 0% 0% % Linker Pol Rechter Pol Skala Histogramm n=anzahl mw=mittelwert md=median s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung Personal Data Course of Study BWL 97.7% BWL i.q..6% VWL 0.8% Wifo 0% Wi.-Päd. 0% Philologie/BaKuWi/MaKuWi 0% Untern.-Jur. 0% Other 0% n=7 Targeted degree: Bachelor 00% Master 0% Diplom 0% Magister 0% PhD 0% Other 0% n= Semester (only for your actual course of study):. 0.8% n=. 90.%. 0.%..%. 0.8% 6..% % 9. 0.% I attended the course regularly: Yes 97.% n=9 No.% EvaSys Auswertung Seite

2 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung I am an exchange student: Yes 9.% n= No 90.6% Evaluation of the course Course objectives were clearly stated.,7% 7,8%,%,% n=6 mw=,7 md= s=0,79 Course requirements and criteria for grading were clearly explained. 0,% 7,%,%,7%,7% n= mw=,6 md= s=0,89 The course was well structured. 0,%,6% 7,% 9,%,6% n= mw=,6 md= s=0,7 The choice of topics was explained by the instructor. 0,%,% 9,% 8,7% 7,9% n=6 mw=,9 md= s=0,86 The choice appeared well-founded to me. 0,%,% 0,9% 0%,% n=6 mw=,8 md= s=0,77 Dissemination of subject matter was appropriately placed over the semester. % 9,%,%,7% n= mw=,7 md= s=0,78 Course content was presented in a comprehensible manner. 0,%,% 7%,% 6,% n=6 mw=, md= s=0,7 Instructor illustrated subject matter with examples from the business world and from current research. 0,% 6,% 7,%,6%,6% n=7 mw=,89 md= s=0,9 Where appropriate instructor drew parallels to businessrelated disciplines. 0,%,6%,7%,% 8,% n= mw=,89 md= s=0,88 Instructor incorporated audio-visual media effectively (e. g., blackboard, overhead projector, video, beamer). 0%,7% 6,% 9,% 9,6% n= mw=,86 md= s=0,86 Visual materials were easy to read and follow. 0,% 8,%,7% 6,9% n= mw=, md= s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

3 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Instructor provided the opportunity for questions regarding content. 0,% 9,%,6%,% n= mw=,7 md= s=0,7 Answers given by the instructor were helpful in clarifying uncertainties. 0% % 9,8%,6%,7% n=6 mw=,68 md= s=0,7 Recommended reading materials (e.g., lecture notes, literature) were useful in facilitating understanding of course content.,% % 6,8% 8% 0% n=0 mw=,88 md= s=0,9 Recommended reading materials (e.g., lecture notes, literature) were readily available.,%,%,8%,8% n= mw=,68 md= s=0,86 Instructor's manner of speaking was clear and audible. 0%,9% 0,%,% 0,% n=7 mw=,68 md= s=0,8 Instructor spoke at an appropriate speed. 0%,%,% 8,6% 6,% n= mw=, md= s=0,6 Instructor's lecturing style sustained my attention.,%,%,%,% 8% n= mw=,7 md= s=0,86 Instructor was open to subject-oriented issues. 0,% %,9% 9,7% % n= mw=,7 md= s=0,8 Instructor was open and friendly towards students. 0,%,6% 7,8% 69,% n= mw=, md= s=0,6 Instructor was able to arouse my interest in the subject. 0,%,% 9,% 0%,9% n= mw=,7 md= s=0,8 Evaluation of general satisfaction with the course Overall, I am satisfied with the course. 0%,%,6% 0,%,7% n= mw=,6 md= s=0,67 Evaluation of teaching and learning environment Prior knowledge and experience helped me master the course content. % 6,%,%,% n= mw=,87 md= s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

4 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Technical equipment (overhead projector, beamer, blackboard, microphone, etc.) was always ready for use and functioned properly). 0% 0,% %,8% 6 n=0 mw=, md= s=0,9 Size of the room was adequate for the course. %,9% 6,9%,% n=9 mw=,78 md= s=0,88 The room setup (seating, tables, lighting, ventilation, etc.) was satisfactory.,6% %,%,6%,6% n=0 mw=,76 md= s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

5 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaftslehre Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert Evaluation of the course Course objectives were clearly stated. n=6 mw=,7 md=,00 s=0,79 Course requirements and criteria for grading were clearly explained. n= mw=,6 md=,00 s=0,89 The course was well structured. n= mw=,60 md=,00 s=0,7 The choice of topics was explained by the instructor. n=6 mw=,90 md=,00 s=0,86 The choice appeared well-founded to me. n=6 mw=,8 md=,00 s=0,77 Dissemination of subject matter was appropriately placed over the semester. n= mw=,7 md=,00 s=0,78 Course content was presented in a comprehensible manner. n=6 mw=, md=,00 s=0,7 Instructor illustrated subject matter with examples from the business world and from current research. n=7 mw=,89 md=,00 s=0,9 Where appropriate instructor drew parallels to business-related disciplines. n= mw=,89 md=,00 s=0,88 Instructor incorporated audio-visual media effectively (e.g., blackboard, overhead projector, video, beamer). n= mw=,86 md=,00 s=0,86 Visual materials were easy to read and follow. n= mw=, md=,00 s=0,7 Instructor provided the opportunity for questions regarding content. n= mw=,7 md=,00 s=0,7 Answers given by the instructor were helpful in clarifying uncertainties. n=6 mw=,68 md=,00 s=0,7 Recommended reading materials (e.g., lecture notes, literature) were useful in facilitating understanding of course content. n=0 mw=,88 md=,00 s=0,9 Recommended reading materials (e.g., lecture notes, literature) were readily available. n= mw=,68 md=,00 s=0,86 Instructor's manner of speaking was clear and audible. n=7 mw=,68 md=,00 s=0,8 Instructor spoke at an appropriate speed. n= mw=, md=,00 s=0,6 Instructor's lecturing style sustained my attention. n= mw=,7 md=,00 s=0,86 Instructor was open to subject-oriented issues. n= mw=,7 md=,00 s=0,80 Instructor was open and friendly towards students. n= mw=, md=,00 s=0,60 Instructor was able to arouse my interest in the subject. n= mw=,7 md=,00 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite

6 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Evaluation of general satisfaction with the course Overall, I am satisfied with the course. n= mw=,6 md=,00 s=0,67 Evaluation of teaching and learning environment Prior knowledge and experience helped me master the course content. n= mw=,87 md=,00 s=0,8 Technical equipment (overhead projector, beamer, blackboard, microphone, etc.) was always ready for use and functioned properly). n=0 mw=, md=,00 s=0,9 Size of the room was adequate for the course. n=9 mw=,78 md=,00 s=0,88 The room setup (seating, tables, lighting, ventilation, etc.) was satisfactory. n=0 mw=,76 md=,00 s=0, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

7 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung Auto-Gruppe What did you especially like about the course? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

8 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8

9 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung What should/could be improved? EvaSys Auswertung Seite 9

10 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung EvaSys Auswertung Seite 0

11 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung EvaSys Auswertung Seite

12 Prof. Dr. Erik Theissen, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung EvaSys Auswertung Seite

Evaluationsstelle der Fakultät für BWL

Evaluationsstelle der Fakultät für BWL, FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung - Herr Professor Dr. Erik Theissen Evaluationsstelle der Fakultät für BWL FIN 0 Investments & Asset Pricing Vorlesung