V5E3 Adv Top in Sci Comp SS 17. Prof. Dr. C. Burstedde. Kursteilnehmer = 0 Erfasste Fragebögen = 7 Rücklaufquote = 0%

Transcription

1 V5E3 Adv Top in Sci Comp SS 17 Prof. Dr. C. Burstedde Kursteilnehmer = 0 Erfasste Frageböge Rücklaufquote = 0% Auswertungsteil der geschlossenen Fragen Legende Fragetext Relative Häufigkeiten der Antworten Std.-Abw. Mittelwert Median Linker Pol Skala 1 0% 2 3 0% 4 Histogramm 5 Rechter Pol n=anzahl mw=mittelwert md=median s=std.-abw. E.=Enthaltung 1. Statistical information 1.1) Major: Mathematics Physics 0% Computer Science 0% Ecomics 0% Other 0% 1.2) Registered as: FFF 0% Bachelor 0% Master 85.7% Bachelor of Education 0% Master of Education 14.3% PhD 0% 1.3) Last degree you wish to obtain: Bachelor 0% n=6 Master 83.3% Bachelor of Education 0% Master of Education 0% PhD 16.7% 1.4) Gender: female 28.6% male 71.4% other 0% EvaSys Auswertung Seite 1

2 1.5) Age? % % % 1.6) Term in your current study programme? % % % 2. Thematic treatment of the lecture 2.1) 2.2) 2.3) 2.4) 2.5) How would you rate the amount of contents? Do you find the lecture clearly structured? Are objective and motivation of the lecture clear for you? How much do you understand during the lecture? Does the lecture style allow you to take helpful tes? 0% 14,3% 85,7% 0% 0% too low too high mw=2,9 5 71,4% 14,3% 14,3% 0% mw=1,4,8 85,7% 14,3% 0% 0% mw=1,1 28,6% 71,4% 0% 0% rather a lot rather little mw=1,7 md=2,5 57,1% 42,9% 0% 0% mw=1,4,5 3. Lecture style 3.1) 3.2) 3.3) 3.4) Do you think the lecturer enjoys holding this lecture? How would you rate the lecture's pace? Does the lecturer spark interest for the topic? Do you find the lecturer's writing readable? 71,4% 28,6% 0% 0% very much hardly mw=1,3,5 0% 14,3% 85,7% 0% 0% too slow too fast mw=2,9 5 0% 0% 0% strongly hardly mw=1 71,4% 28,6% 0% 0% mw=1,3, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 2

3 3.5) 3.7) 3.8) 3.9) Do you find the blackboard image clearly arranged? Do you ask the lecturer questions during or after the lecture? Does the lecturer respond comprehensibly to your questions? Do you think the lecturer is taking you seriously? Prof. Dr. C. Burstedde, V5E3 Adv Top in Sci Comp 57,1% 28,6% 14,3% 0% mw=1,6,8 0% 33,3% 16,7% often never n=6 mw=3,2,5 s=1 0% 0% 0% n=4 mw=1 0% 0% 0% n=4 mw=1 4. Compared to your other lectures 4.1) 4.2) How would you rate the lecture's workload? How would you rate the lecture's difficulty? 0% 14,3% 85,7% 0% 0% too low too high mw=2,9 5 0% 0% 0% 0% too low too high mw= ) How much addtitional time, in hours, do you spend on average per week for understanding the lecture's material (including working on the exercises)? <2 42.9% % > % > % > % >20 0% 5. Overall impression 5.1) Which grade does the lecture deserve? very good 42.9% good 57.1% satisfactory 0% sufficient 0% n sufficient 0% 5.2) Does the lecturer deserve a teaching award? positive 83.3% rather t 16.7% n= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 3

4 6. Exercises 6.1) 6.2) 6.3) Do the exercises help you to understand the material? Is the kwledge acquired in the lecture sufficient to solve the exercises? How would you rate the exercises' difficulty? 0% 0% 0% n=4 mw=1 80% 20% 0% 0% n=5 mw=1,2 0% 0% 80% 20% 0% too low too high n=5 mw=3, ) Which percentage of the exercises can you solve on your own? < 20% 0% 20-0% 50-80% 40% > 80% 60% n=5 6.5) How much addtitional time, in hours, do you spend on average per week for working on the exercises? <2 2-4 >4-6 0% >6-9 0% >9-12 0% >12 0% n= EvaSys Auswertung Seite 4

5 Histogramme zu den Skalafragen How would you rate the amount of contents? Do you find the lecture clearly structured? Are objective and motivation of the lecture clear for you? too low too high 86% mw = % mw = % mw = 1.1 How much do you understand during the lecture? Does the lecture style allow you to take helpful tes? Do you think the lecturer enjoys holding this lecture? rather a lot rather little very much hardly mw = 1.7 mw = 1.4 mw = % 71%.5 57% 43%.5 71% 29%.5 How would you rate the lecture's pace? Does the lecturer spark interest for the topic? Do you find the lecturer's writing readable? too slow too fast strongly hardly 86% mw = 2.9 mw = 1 71% mw = % Do you find the blackboard image clearly arranged? Do you ask the lecturer questions during or after the lecture? Does the lecturer respond comprehensibly to your questions? often never mw = 1.6 mw = 3.2 mw = 1 57%.8 s = 1 29% 33% n = 6 n = 4 17% Do you think the lecturer is taking you seriously? How would you rate the lecture's workload? How would you rate the lecture's difficulty? too low too high too low too high mw = 1 86% mw = 2.9 mw = 3 n = EvaSys Auswertung Seite 5

6 Do the exercises help you to understand the material? Is the kwledge acquired in the lecture sufficient to solve the exercises? How would you rate the exercises' difficulty? too low too high mw = 1 mw = 1.2 mw = % 80% n = 4 20% n = 5 20% n = EvaSys Auswertung Seite 6

7 Profillinie Teilbereich: Name der/des Lehrenden: Titel der Lehrveranstaltung: (Name der Umfrage) Mathematik Prof. Dr. C. Burstedde V5E3 Adv Top in Sci Comp Verwendete Werte in der Profillinie: Mittelwert 2. Thematic treatment of the lecture 2.1) How would you rate the amount of contents? too low too high 2.2) Do you find the lecture clearly structured? mw=2,9,0 mw=1,4,0,8 2.3) Are objective and motivation of the lecture clear for you? mw=1,1,0 2.4) How much do you understand during the lecture? rather a lot rather little mw=1,7 md=2,0,5 2.5) Does the lecture style allow you to take helpful tes? mw=1,4,0,5 3. Lecture style 3.1) Do you think the lecturer enjoys holding this lecture? very much hardly mw=1,3,0,5 3.2) How would you rate the lecture's pace? too slow too fast 3.3) Does the lecturer spark interest for the topic? strongly hardly 3.4) Do you find the lecturer's writing readable? mw=2,9,0 mw=1,0,0,0 mw=1,3,0,5 3.5) Do you find the blackboard image clearly arranged? mw=1,6,0,8 3.7) Do you ask the lecturer questions during or after the lecture? often never n=6 mw=3,2,5 s=1,0 3.8) Does the lecturer respond comprehensibly to your questions? n=4 mw=1,0,0,0 3.9) Do you think the lecturer is taking you seriously? n=4 mw=1,0,0,0 4. Compared to your other lectures 4.1) How would you rate the lecture's workload? too low too high 4.2) How would you rate the lecture's difficulty? too low too high mw=2,9,0 mw=3,0,0,0 6. Exercises 6.1) Do the exercises help you to understand the material? n=4 mw=1,0,0,0 6.2) Is the kwledge acquired in the lecture sufficient to solve the exercises? n=5 mw=1,2,0 6.3) How would you rate the exercises' difficulty? too low too high n=5 mw=3,2, EvaSys Auswertung Seite 7

8 Auswertungsteil der offenen Fragen 3. Lecture style 3.6) Comments / suggestions regarding the blackboard image: Impressive 3-d pictures! :) EvaSys Auswertung Seite 8