TABLE S1A. Summary of physical therapy interventions gait and mobility-related functions and activities Intervention n RCTs N Patients

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TABLE S1A. Summary of physical therapy interventions gait and mobility-related functions and activities Intervention n RCTs N Patients"

Transcription

1 TABLE S1A. Summary of physical therapy interventions gait and mobility-related functions and activities Intervention n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C/?) Intensity of intervention (ranges between studies given only) Main results meta-analyses Early mobilization ////1 2-4 times/d, 2 wk Strong evidence (=): complications, neurological deterioration early poststroke, fatigue, basic ADL, discharge home Risk of bias References (PEDro) of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 8 [1,2] Sitting balance training 6 15 /5//1/ 3-6 min/d, 5 d/wk, 2-4 wk Strong evidence (+): sitting balance, hand movement time 4 8 [3-8] Strong evidence (=): ground reaction force, symmetry while sitting or standing, walking ability, basic ADL Sit-to-stand training /4//1/ min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 1-6 wk Strong evidence (=): body weight distribution, sit-to-stand 4 6 [9-13] Standing balance training without /3//1/ 45-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 2-8 wk Strong evidence (=): postural sway, balance, sit-to-stand, walking ability 4 8 [14-17] biofeedback Standing balance training with biofeedback force and position feedback /6/5/1/ 15-6 min, 2-5 d/wk, 2-4 wk Strong evidence (+): postural sway Strong evidence (=): motor function leg (synergy), comfortable gait speed, cadence, step length, mono and bipedal phase, balance, walking ability, basic ADL Balance training during various activities /5/3/3/ 3-6 min/d, 3-7 d/wk, 3-1 wk Strong evidence (+): balance, basic ADL Strong evidence (=): comfortable gait speed, falls-efficacy, walking ability, quality of life 3 6 [13,18-29] 4 8 [3-4] Body-weight supported treadmill training /11//8/ 15-9 min/d, 3-6 d/wk, 2-6 wk Strong evidence (+): comfortable gait speed, walking distance 4 8 [41-61] Strong evidence (=): motor function leg (synergy), maximum gait speed, cadence, stride length, aerobic capacity, energy expenditure, balance, walking ability, quality of life Electromechanical-assisted gait training /11/1/4/ 15-6 min/d, 3-7 d/wk, 2-1 wk 4 8 [48,55,62-77] Electromechanical-assisted gait training without functional electrostimulation Electromechanical-assisted gait training with functional electrostimulation Speed dependent treadmill training (without body-weight support) /11/1/4/ 15-6 min/d, 3-7 d/wk, 2-1 wk Strong evidence (+): maximum gait speed, walking distance, peak heart rate, basic ADL Strong evidence (=): neurological functions, motor function paretic leg (synergy), muscle strength, comfortable gait speed, cadence, step length, heart rate rest, balance, walking ability, quality of life /2//1/ 2 min/d, 5-7 d/wk, 3-4 wk Strong evidence (+): balance, walking ability Strong evidence (=): maximum gait speed, basic ADL /3/1/9/ 8-6 min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 2 wk 6 mos Overground walking /5/4/1/ 15-6 mind, 1-5 d/wk, 2 wk 6 mos Strong evidence (+): maximum gait speed, step width Strong evidence (=): comfortable gait speed, gait speed endurance, walking distance, cadence, stride length, aerobic capacity, balance, walking ability Strong evidence (+): anxiety (independent walking patients) Strong evidence (=): comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, walking distance, cadence, stride length, stride time, symmetry gait pattern, number of falls, peak heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, depression, balance, walking ability, basic ADL, extended ADL Strong evidence ( ): aerobic capacity (dependent walking patients) 4 8 [48,55,62-67,69-77] 6 [62,63,71] 4 8 [41,78-9] 2 8 [44,45,56,57,62,72,73,76,77,9-13] Rhythmic gait cueing /4//2/ 3 min/d, 5 d/wk, 3-12 wk Strong evidence (=): gait speed, cadence, stride length, symmetry gait 3 7 [14-19] pattern Community walking 3 94 /1//2/ 3-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, wk Strong evidence (=): maximum gait speed, walking distance, balance 6 8 [87,11,111] confidence Virtual reality mobility training 6 15 /6/// 2-6 min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 2-4 wk Strong evidence (=): comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, step 5 7 [ ] length, walking ability Circuit class training (gait and mobilityrelated /1/3/4/ 3-75 min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 4-19 wk Strong evidence (+): walking distance, balance, walking ability, physical 5 8 [34,38,93,98,99, ] functions and activities) activity Strong evidence (=): muscle strength, gait speed, number of falls, fallsefficacy, depression, basic ADL, extended ADL, quality of life Caregiver-mediated exercises (gait and 3 35 /2//1/ 35-6 min/d, 2-7 d/wk, 8 wk 6 Strong evidence (+): basic ADL, caregiver strain 4 8 [91,123,124] mobility-related functions and activities) mos Strong evidence (=): extended ADL Orthosis for walking /1//1/2 24 wk 6 mos Strong evidence (=): comfortable gait speed 2 7 [43, ] Water-based exercises 3 65 ///3/ 45-6 min/d, 2-3 d/wk, 8-12 wk Strong evidence (+): muscle strength 5 6 [128-13] Strong evidence (=): balance Interventions for somatosensory /3/2/1/ 2-48 min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 2-8 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function leg (synergy), gait speed, balance 5 8 [14, ] functions of the paretic leg Electrostimulation of the paretic leg /13/4/7/2 9-6 min/d, 2-7 d/wk, 3-8 wk 2 8 [63,71,126,132, ] NMS 18 Strong evidence (+): motor function leg (synergy), muscle tone, muscle strength [63,71,126,136,137, , , ,157,158]

2 Strong evidence (=): active range of motion, gait speed, cadence, step length, symmetry gait, balance, walking ability, basic ADL EMG-NMS 2 Strong evidence (=): muscle tone, basic ADL [142,153] TENS 5 Strong evidence (+): muscle strength, walking ability Strong evidence (=): muscle tone, active range of motion ankle, gait speed, walking distance [132,143,148, ] Electromyographic biofeedback for the paretic leg /3//7/1 2-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 2-12 wk Strong evidence (=): range of motion, step length, gait speed, EMG activity 2 7 [14,137, ] +, significant positive SES; =, nonsignficant SES;, significant negative SES; ADL, Activities of daily living; C, Chronic phase; d, day(s); ER, Early rehabilitation phase; EMG, Electromyographic (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; min, minutes; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; mos, months; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; SES, Summary effect size; wk, week(s)

3 TABLE S1B. Summary of physical therapy interventions arm-hand activities Intervention Therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm Reflex-inhibiting positions and immobilization techniques for the paretic wrist and hand n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C/?) Intensity of intervention (ranges between studies given only) 5 14 /1/// 2-4 times/d, 2-3 min/session, 5-7 d/wk Main results meta-analyses Strong evidence (+): passive range of motion shoulder external rotation Strong evidence (=):passive range of motion shoulder internal rotation, contracture shoulder, pain (rest and movement), basic ADL Risk of bias References (PEDro) of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 6 7 [ ] /2/1/5/ 2-22h/d, 5-7 d/wk, 1-6 mos Strong evidence (=): muscle tone, pain, passive range of motion 3 8 [173-18] Air-splints around the paretic arm /3/1/1/ 3-45 min/d, 5-7 d/wk, 3-6 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle tone, 4 8 [ ] somatosensory function, pain, arm-hand activities Supportive techniques or devices for the prevention or treatment of glenohumeral subluxation and/or hemiplegic shoulder pain /3/// 4-6 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), pain 4 7 [ ] Bilateral arm training /3/1/18/ 2 min 6 h/d, 2-6 d/wk, 1-8 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm, muscle strength, arm-hand 2 8 [19-211] activities, self-reported arm-hand use in daily life, basic ADL (modified) Constraint-induced movement /11/3/27/ 2 8 [19,196,25,27,29, ] therapy Original CIMT //1// 6 h/d, 5 d/wk, 2 wk Strong evidence (+): arm-hand activities, self-reported amount of arm-hand use in daily life, self-reported quality of arm-hand movement in daily life [225,226] High-intensity mcimt h/d, 1-7 d/wk, 2-8 wk Strong evidence (+): arm-hand activities, self-reported amount of arm-hand [196,27,212,216,217,223,224,227, ,238,24-242,245,249] use in daily life, self-reported quality of arm-hand movement in daily life Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), basic ADL Low-intensity mcimt 22 3 min 2 h/d, 3-7 d/wk, 2-12 wk Strong evidence (+): motor function arm (synergy), arm-hand activities, selfreported amount of arm-hand use in daily life, self-reported quality of armhand movement in daily life, basic ADL Strong evidence (=): arm-hand related quality of life Mitt use 2 2 wk [pooling not possible] [22,243] Robot-assisted arm training /8/1/13/ 2-12 min/d, 3-5 d/wk, 3-12 wk 4 8 [199,25-271] Unilateral shoulder-elbow robotics 15 Strong evidence (+): motor function arm proximal (synergy), muscle strength, muscle strength arm proximal, pain Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), motor function arm distal, muscle strength arm distal, muscle tone, arm-hand activities, basic ADL, quality of life Virtual reality training for the paretic arm /4/2/9/ 2-6 min/d, 3-7 d/wk, 1 d 7 wk Bilateral elbow-wrist robotics 2 Strong evidence (+): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength [256,268] Shoulder-elbow-wrist-hand robotics 2 Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength distal [259,264] Wrist robotics 2 [pooling not possible] [265,266] Wrist-hand robotics 1 [pooling not possible] [261] Mental practice with motor imagery /6//8/ 1-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 3-1 wk Strong evidence (+): arm-hand activities 4 7 [ ] Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength, basic ADL Mirror therapy for the paretic arm /1/2/4/ 3-6 min/d, 2-6 d/wk, 4-6 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle tone, pain, arm- 5 8 [278,285-29] hand activities Strong evidence (+): basic ADL Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), arm-hand activities Strong evidence ( ): muscle tone 3 8 [291-36] [19,25,28,29,211, ,218,219,221,222, ,237, ,244,246,248] [199,25, ,257,258,26,262,263,267, ] Electrostimulation of the paretic arm /23/6/19/1 2 min 8 h/d, 2-7 d/wk, 2 wk 5 mnd 3 8 [143,193,197,255,259,37-354] NMS wrist/finger extensors Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), active range of motion, muscle strength, arm-hand activities NMS wrist/finger flexors/extensors Strong evidence (+): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength Strong evidence (=): arm-hand activities NMS shoulder Strong evidence (+): subluxation Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), range of motion, pain EMG-NMS wrist/finger extensors Strong evidence (+): motor function arm (synergy), active range of motion, arm-hand activities Strong evidence (=): muscle strength, muscle tone EMG-NMS wrist/finger Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), arm-hand activities flexors/extensors TENS Strong evidence (=): muscle tone, basic ADL Electromyographic biofeedback of the /3/4/3/1 2-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 2-6 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), active range of motion, 2 7 [16, ]

4 paretic arm arm-hand activities Trunk restraint 4 86 ///4/ 4 min 6 h/d, 2-5 d/wk, 2-5 wk Strong evidence (=): active range of motion, arm-hand activities 4 8 [245, ] Strong evidence ( ): self-reported amount of arm-hand use in daily life Interventions for somatosensory functions of the paretic arm /3/4/5/ 3-18 min, 2-6 d/wk, 2 wk 3 mos Strong evidence (+):muscle tone, somatosensory functions Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength, pain, arm-hand activities, basic ADL 3 9 [134,182,183,185,315,316,328, ] +, significant positive SES; =, nonsignficant SES;, significant negative SES;?, unclear; ADL, Activities of daily living; C, Chronic phase; d, day(s); CIMT, Constraint-induced movement therapy; ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; min, minutes; mcimt, modified Constraint-induced movement therapy; mos, months; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; wk, week(s); SES, Summary effect size

5 TABLE S1C. Summary of physical therapy interventions physical fitness Intervention n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C) Strength exercises for the paretic leg Strength exercises for the paretic arm Cardiorespiratory exercises Mixed strength and cardiorespiratory exercises Intensity of intervention (ranges between studies given only) /6/2/ min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 4-16 wk Main results meta-analyses Strong evidence (+): muscle strength leg, muscle tone, spatiotemporal gait pattern parameters Strong evidence (=): motor function leg (synergy), comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, walking distance, aerobic capacity, heart rate work, workload, physiological cost index, walking ability, basic ADL, quality of life /3//6 5-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 2-6 wk Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength arm, pain, range of motion, arm-hand activities /4//9 1-6 min/d, 2-5 d/wk, 4 wk 6 mos /5/2/ min/d, 3-4 d/wk, 4-19 wk Strong evidence (+): aerobic capacity, workload, respiratory functions Strong evidence (=): motor function leg (synergy), muscle strength leg, comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, walking distance, heart rate rest, heart rate work, blood pressure rest, physiological cost index, body composition, blood variables, balance, walking ability Strong evidence (+): motor function leg (synergy), muscle strength leg, comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, walking distance, aerobic capacity, heart rate work, balance, physical activity, quality of life Strong evidence (=): motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength arm, physiological cost index, depression, walking ability, arm-hand activities, basic ADL, extended ADL Risk of bias (PEDro) References of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 2 8 [12, ] 2 7 [52,378,379,391, ] 4 8 [49,58,82-86,88,128,387,388,399-46] 3 8 [93,96,98,99,121,387,388,47-416] +, significant positive SES; =, nonsignficant SES;?, unclear; ADL, Activities of daily living; C, Chronic phase; d, day(s); ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; min, minutes; mos, months; SES, Summary effect size; wk, week(s)

6 TABLE S1D. Summary of physical therapy interventions activities of daily living Intervention n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C) Interventions for apraxia gestural training Intensity of intervention (ranges between studies given only) Main results meta-analyses Risk of bias (PEDro) References of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 4 5 [417,418] 2 46 ///2 5 min/d, 3 d/wk, 3-35 sessions Strong evidence (+): gesture comprehension Strong evidence (=): ideational apraxia, ideomotor apraxia Leisure therapy /3/1/2 3-6 min/d, <1 1 d/wk, 5 Strong evidence (+):leisure participation 4 7 [ ] wk 6 mos Strong evidence (=): depression, mood, quality of life +, significant positive SES; =, nonsignficant SES; C, Chronic phase; d, day(s); ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; min, minutes; mos, months; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; SES, Summary effect size; wk, week(s)

7 TABLE S1E. Summary of physical therapy interventions other Intervention n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C) Inspiratory muscle training Intensity of intervention (ranges between studies given only) Main results meta-analyses Risk of bias (PEDro) of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 2 66 //1/1 3 min/d, 5-7 d/wk, 6-8 wk Strong evidence (=): maximal inspiratory pressure 4 7 [425,426] =, nonsignficant SES; C, Chronic phase; d, day(s); ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; min, minutes; mos, months; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; SES, Summary effect size; wk, week(s) References

8 TABLE S1F. Summary of physical therapy interventions intensity of practice Intervention n RCTs N Patients Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C/?) Intensity difference between experimental and control group (mean) Main results meta-analyses Intensity of practice /48/5/21/3 17 h during 1 wk Strong evidence (+): motor function leg (synergy), motor function arm (synergy), muscle strength leg, comfortable gait speed, maximum gait speed, muscle tone, depression and anxiety, balance, basic ADL, quality of life Strong evidence (=): muscle strength arm, walking distance, mental health patient, falls-efficacy, walking ability, arm-hand activities, extended ADL, falls, mental health caregiver Risk of bias (PEDro) References of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) 2 8 [1,2,6,1-12,14,17,33,36-38,4,73,88,91,92,94,95,1,11,1 4,18,111,12,121,123,124,127,1 29,135,182,237,369,37,374,386, ,396,398,4-43,46-411,415,422, ]?, unclear; +, significant positive SES; =, nonsignficant SES; ADL, Activities of daily living; C, Chronic phase; ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; h, hours; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; SES, Summary effect size; wk, weeks

9 TABLE S1G. Summary of physical therapy interventions neurological treatment approaches Intervention n RCTs N Patients NDT versus another intervention NDT versus NDT + another intervention Augmented NDT versus NDT (intensity difference) Start study time poststroke, n RCTs ([H]AR/ER/LR/C/?) /16/3/17/1 strength training, training balance during various activities, training standing balance with biofeedback force and position feedback, overground walking, rhythmic auditory cueing, electromechanical-assisted gait training, mcimt, bilateral arm training, robotics, virtual reality training for the paretic arm, somatosensory training, EMG- BF, strength training, motor relearning programme, orthopaedic programme, movement science-based therapy or problem-willing oriented movement /19/7/8/1 NDT plus: training standing balance with biofeedback force and position feedback, training sitting balance, training standing balance, training balance during various activities, overground walking, community walking, rhythmic auditory cueing, treadmill training, BWSTT, electromechanical-assisted gait training, aerobic training, robotics, virtual reality arm, NMS, EMG-NMS, TENS, EMG- BF or passive movement of the wrist with an apparatus Control intervention Main results best-evidence synthesis Risk of bias (PEDro) of RCTs (ranges between studies given only) Strong evidence (=): muscle strength arm, depression Strong evidence ( ): motor function (synergy), walking speed, spatiotemporal gait parameters, kinematics arm, arm-hand activities, self-reported arm-hand activities in daily life, basic ADL, quality of life Moderate evidence (=): muscle strength leg, maximal weight bearing paretic leg, coordination, stability shoulder joint, shoulder pain, walking distance, health belief, balance Moderate evidence ( ): length of stay Insufficient evidence: grip strength, muscle tone, brain activity, walking ability, extended ADL Strong evidence (=): kinematics gait Strong evidence ( ): motor function (synergy), muscle strength arm, gait speed, spatiotemporal gait parameters, muscle tone, range of motion, balance, walking ability, arm-hand activities, basic ADL Moderate evidence (=): symmetry (sitting, standing, sit-to-stand and wile reaching), depression, stand-to-sit, sit-to-stand Moderate evidence ( ): muscle strength leg, walking distance, coordination, EMG contraction, shoulder subluxation, neglect, aerobic capacity /5///1 NDT Strong evidence (=): strength, walking ability, arm-hand activities, basic ADL, extended ADL Moderate evidence (+): motor function (synergy), range of motion Moderate evidence (=): pain, depression, balance, sit-to-stand, handicap, quality of life References 4 8 [5,35,64,71,19,19,195,196,198,1 99,22,25,28,21,211, ,235,244,246,247,253,262,268, 3,36,385,396,448, ] 2 8 [4,6,15,26,28,33,48,49,77,79,1,1 2,15,111,132,142,146,149,167,1 79,258,287,318,324,329,33,344,3 5,364,449,463,464] 6 8 [432,437,439,445,446,448] +, significant positive effect; =, nonsignficant effect;, significant negative effect;?, unclear; ADL, Activities of daily living; BWSTT, Body-weight supported treadmill training; C, Chronic phase; EMG-BF, Electromyographic biofeedback; EMG, Electromyograpic; EMG-NMS, Electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation; ER, Early rehabilitation phase; (H)AR, (hyper)acute rehabilitation phase; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; mcimt, modified Constraint-induced movement therapy; NDT, Neurodevelopmental treatment; NMS, Neuromuscular stimulation; RCTs, Randomized controlled trials; SES, Summary effect size; TENS, Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

10 TABLE S2A. Summary of the evidence for physical therapy interventions gait and mobility-related functions and activities Intervention Pooling possible for: Outcome measures N (pooling) Type effects model SES (95%CI) Hedges g Heterogeneity I 2 (%) Early mobilization Sitting balance training *, only RCTs investigating reaching beyond arm s length while sitting Sit-to-stand training Standing balance training without biofeedback Standing balance training with biofeedback force and position feedback Balance training during various activities Body-weight supported treadmill training Electromechanicalassisted gait training *, only for dependent patients a. complications b. neurological deterioration early poststroke c. fatigue d. basic ADL e. discharge home a. symmetry while sitting b. symmetry while standing c. ground reaction force* d. hand movement time* e. sitting balance f. sitting balance* g. walking ability h. basic ADL a. body weight distribution b. sit-to-stand a. postural sway b. balance c. sit-to-stand d. walking ability a. motor function leg (synergy) b. comfortable gait speed c. cadence d. step length e. mono and bipedal phase f. postural sway phase: ER phase: C (n=1) g. balance h. walking ability i. basic ADL a. comfortable gait speed b. falls-efficacy c. balance d. walking ability e. basic ADL f. quality of life a. motor function leg (synergy) b. comfortable gait speed c. maximum gait speed d. walking distance e. cadence f. stride length g. aerobic capacity h. energy expenditure i. balance j. walking ability k. quality of life a. neurological functions b. motor function leg (synergy) c. muscle strength d. comfortable gait speed* phase: ER (dependent) phase: C (independent) Dependent & independent a. complications b. deterioration (5 d, -7d) c. Borg RPE d. mrs e. discharge home a. symmetry sitting b. symmetry standing c. GRF d. hand movement time reaching e. reach distance, sitting equilibrium test f. reach distance, sitting equilibrium test g. BI mobility, FAC h. BI, FIM a. BWD sitting, BWD rising, BWD sitting down b. STS a. posturography b. BBS, MAS* sitting c. MAS* STS, STS d. MAS* STS, RMI, RMA, RMA GF, TCT a. FMA, Brunnstrom stages b. 1MWT, WS c. gait analysis d. gait analysis e. DST, SST f. posturography g. BBS, FMA balance, PASS, standing affected leg, standing nonaffected leg h. FAC, FIM locomotion, stair climbing, walking, RMA GF, RMI, TUG i. BI, FIM, NEADL, FIM motor a. 1MWT, WS b. ABC, FES-I c. BBA, BBS, FR, LRT, static standing, step reaction time, ST, TIS d. MAS* walking, STS, stand-to-sit, stair climb, Tinetti gait, TUG e. BI, FIM f. NHP, QoL, SA-SIP3, SF-36 a. FMA b. 1MWT, WS c. 1MWT, WS d. 12MWT, 6MWT, walking distance e. gait analysis f. gait analysis g. VO 2 max h. O 2 -cost i. BBS, FMA balance j. FAC, FIM locomotion, FIM gait, RMA GF, RMA LT, RMI, TCT, TUG, SPPB k. AAP, SA-SIP3, SIS, LLFDI a. CNS, NIHSS b. FMA c. MI leg, MRC d. 1MWT, 8MWT, WS e. 1MWT, 5MWT, WS f. 3MWT, 6MWT g. gait analysis a. 21 b. 13 c. 13 d. 13 e. 13 a. 59 b. 59 c. 5 d. 5 e. 7 f. 5 g. 59 h. 59 a. 13 b. 5 a. 42 b. 149 c. 149 d. 148 a. 97 b. 184 c. 67 d. 67 e. 67 f g. 186 h. 251 i. 191 a. 88 b. 82 c. 397 d. 271 e. 211 f. 252 a. 448 b. 858 c. 179 d. 832 e. 56 f. 142 g. 32 h. 33 i. 54 j. 357 k. 514 a. 115 b. 53 c. 313 d a. b. c. d. e. a. b. c. Random d. e. Random f. Random g. h. a. Random b. a. b. c. d. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Random i. a. b. c. Random d. e. f. a. b. Random c. d. Random e. f. g. h. i. Random j. k. a. Random b. Random c. d. Random a..9 (-.484,.663) b (-.828,.152) c..178 (-.24,.561) d..376 (-.71,.824) e..276 (-.216,.768) a (-.715,.433) b (-.911,.246) c (-.171, 8.532) d (1.114, 2.388) e (-.93, 3.546) f (.836, 4.18) g (-.617,.455) h (-.775,.3) a..264 (-.474, 1.2) b..45 (-.138,.948) a..225 (-.364,.815) b (-.444,.193) c..6 (-.259,.378) d..116 (-.23,.435) a..121 (-.269,.511) b (-.54,.63) c (-.511,.427) d..62 (-.47,.53) e (-.595,.353) f..366 (.49,.683).29 (-.14,.559) 1.9 (.339, 1.842) g (-.489,.72) h. -.1 (-.432,.413) i (-.328,.232) a..313 (-.1,.726) b..181 (-.247,.69) c..355 (.67,.642) d..137 (-.99,.374) e..383 (.113,.653) f (-.393,.96) a (-.387,.) b..468 (.17,.829) c..245 (-.41,.532) d..66 (.173, 1.39) e (-.793,.222) f..148 (-.173,.47) g..631 (-.51, 1.314) h..563 (-.12, 1.228) i..69 (-.118, 1.336) j..215 (.,.431) k..54 (-.126,.234) a..192 (-.492,.877) b..28 (-1.74, 1.129) c..29 (-.12,.429) d..261 (-.3,.821).983 (.319, 1.647) -.66 (-.547,.415).14 (-.826,.853) a. b. c. d. 4 e. a. 26 b. 38 c. 94 d. e. 9 f. 77 g. h. a. 77 b. a. 33 b. c. d. a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 6 i. 34 a. b. c. 51 d. 24 e. 48 f. 8 a. 12 b. 82 c. d. 87 e. 25 f. g. 4 h. i. 92 j. 42 k. a. 67 b. 73 c. 35 d. 58 Statistical power a..88 b..317 c..123 d..378 e..229 a..74 b..189 c. 1. d..996 e. 1. f. 1. g..58 h..119 a..391 b..359 a..99 b..12 c..62 d..134 a..81 b..248 c..53 d..56 e..72 f g..228 h..51 i..6 a..244 b..111 c..863 d..162 e..66 f..176 a..433 b. 1. c..298 d. 1. e..147 f..118 g..327 h..273 i. 1. j..422 k..83 a..144 b..51 c..358 d Difference between poststroke phases a. NA b. NA c. NA d. NA e. NA a. NA b. NA e. S = ER: beyond arm s length f. NS g. NA h. NA b. NA c. NA e. NS f. S g. NS h. NS i. NS a. NA e. NS f. NS e. NS f. NS g. NS h. NS i. NS j. NS k. NS a. NA d. S

11 Electromechanicalassisted gait training with functional electrostimulation * only early rehabilitation phase Speed dependent treadmill training (without body-weight support) Overground walking * independent patients ** dependent patients e. maximum gait speed f. walking distance g. cadence phase: ER phase: LR phase: C h. step length i. heart rate rest j. peak heart rate k. balance phase: ER phase: LR (n=1) phase: C l. walking ability* phase: ER (dependent) phase: LR (independent) phase: C (independent) m. basic ADL n. quality of life a. maximum gait speed phase: ER (dependent) phase: C (independent) b. balance c. walking ability* d. basic ADL a. comfortable gait speed b. maximum gait speed c. gait speed endurance d. walking distance e. cadence f. step width g. stride length h. aerobic capacity i. balance j. walking ability a. comfortable gait speed b. maximum gait speed c. walking distance phase: ER (dependent) phase: C (independent) d. cadence phase: LR phase: C (n=1) e. stride length phase: ER phase: LR (n=1) phase: C (n=1) f. stride time g. symmetry gait pattern h. number of falls* i. aerobic capacity** j. peak heart rate* k. diastolic blood pressure* l. systolic blood pressure* m. anxiety* n. depression* o. balance phase: LR (n=1) phase: C p. walking ability phase: ER phase: LR (n=1) phase: C q. basic ADL r. extended ADL h. gait analysis i. HR rest j. HR peak k. BBS, DB, SST affected leg, SB, Tinetti balance, ST l. EMS, EU walking scale, FAC, mefap, RMA GF, RMA LT, RMI, SAS disability, SPPB, TCT, TMS m. BI, FIM, FIM motor n. SF-36, LLFDI a. 1MWT, 5MWT b. BBS, DB, SB c. EMS, FAC d. BI, FIM a. 1MWT, WS b. 1MWT, WS c. 6MWT d. 6MWT, walking endurance e. gait analysis f. gait analysis g. gait analysis h. VO 2 max, VO 2 peak i. BBS, balance j. FAC, RMI, STS, S-test complex gait, gait a. 1MWT, 5MWT, WS b. 1MWT, 5MWT c. 6MWT, walking distance d. gait analysis e. gait analysis f. gait analysis g. gait analysis h. falls i. VO 2 max, VO 2 peak j. HR peak k. diastolic BP l. systolic BP m. HADS anxiety n. HADS depression o. BBS, DB, SB p. BI walking, FAC, FIM locomotion, RMA GF, RMA LT, RMI, STREAM mobility, TCT, TUG, ST q. BI, FIM r. AAP, FAI, mrs, NEADL e. 383 f. 394 g h. 68 i. 95 j. 95 k l m. 43 n. 112 a b. 12 c. 72 d. 12 a. 192 b. 34 c. 11 d. 213 e. 19 f. 82 g. 221 h. 178 i. 44 j. 133 a. 541 b. 159 c d e f. 5 g. 5 h. 256 i. 49 j. 49 k. 49 l. 49 m. 224 n. 224 o p q. 362 r. 391 e. f. g. Random h. i. j. k. Random l. Random m. n. Random a. Random b. c. d. Random a. b. c. d. Random e. f. g. h. i. j. Random a. Random b. c. d. Random Random e. Random f. g. h. i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Random p. Random Random q. r. Random e..215 (.16,.413) f..246 (.51,.442) g (-.811,.695).43 (-.98,.94) (-1.654, -.388).68 (-.54,.676) h..177 (-.234,.589) i (-.719,.79) j..52 (.116,.923) k (-.63,.525).484 (.131,.836) (-2.519, ).4 (-.329,.336) l..186 (-.329, 1.333).421 (.237,.65) (-2.873, ) -.51 (-.428,.326) m..433 (.237,.63) n..122 (-.594,.838) a..496 (-.782, 1.774) 1.15 (.442, 1.857) (-.852,.543) b..397 (.8,.786) c. 1.6 (.57, 1.551) d..137 (-.669,.943) a. -.1 (-.292,.273) b..236 (.9,.462) c (-.47,.331) d..143 (-.126,.412) e..14 (-.184,.393) f..567 (.135,.999) g..234 (-.34,.52) h..243 (-.49,.536) i (-.899,.249) j..632 (-.126, 1.391) a..267 (-.19,.554) b..238 (-.74,.55) c. -.8 (-.23,.186) (-.71, -.47).278 (.15,.54) d..15 (-1.53, 1.264).646 (-.177, 1.469) (-1.779, -.168) e..588 (-.362, 1.538) (-.678,.255).986 (.18, 1.793) (.314, 1.957) f..39 (-.232,.85) g..374 (-.167,.916) h..52 (-.26,.364) i (-1.215, -.93) j (-1.84,.27) k (-.593,.49) l (-1.5,.13) m..356 (.93,.619) n..232 (-.29,.494) o..462 (-.261, 1.184) (1.333, 2.519).137 (-.141,.415) p..266 (-.171,.72) -.86 (-.664,.493) (1.348, 3.142).225 (.11,.439) q (-.282,.13) r (-.554,.9) e. f. 8 g h. i. j. k. 84 l. 82 m. 39 n. 71 a. 85 b. 44 c. d. 76 a. b. c. d. e. 9 f. g. 15 h. i. j. 73 a. 56 b. c. 38 d e. 82 f. g. h. i. 24 j. 14 k. l. 44 m. n. o. 86 p q. 41 r. 56 e..439 f..566 g h..18 i..48 j..869 k l m..96 n..87 a b..682 c..955 d..92 a..5 b..428 c..53 d..149 e..97 f..598 g..328 h..291 i..153 j..877 a..771 b..255 c d e f..16 g..213 h..65 i..513 j..369 k..53 l..286 m..63 n..323 o p q..96 r..588 e. NS f. NS g. S h. NS i. NA j. NA k. S l. S m. NS n. NS a. S c. NA c. NA e. NS f. NA g. NS h. NA i. NS j. NS c. S d. S e. S f. NS g. NS h. NS i. NA j. NA k. NA l. NA m. NA n. NA o. S p. S q. NS r. NS

12 Rhythmic gait cueing Community walking Virtual reality mobility training Circuit class training (gait and mobility-related functions and activities) Caregiver-mediated exercises (gait and mobility-related functions and activities) a. gait speed b. cadence c. stride length d. symmetry gait pattern a. maximum gait speed b. walking distance c. balance confidence a. comfortable gait speed b. maximum gait speed c. step length d. walking ability a. muscle strength b. gait speed c. walking distance d. number of falls e. falls-efficacy f. depression g. balance h. walking ability i. basic ADL j. extended ADL k. physical activity l. quality of life a. basic ADL b. extended ADL c. caregiver strain a. WS b. gait analysis c. gait analysis d. gait analysis a. 1MWT b. 6MWT c. ABC a. 1MWT, WS b. 1MWT, WS, top speed c. gait analysis d. FAC, WAQ, MMAS* walking, MMAS* balance and gait a. strength flexor/extensor: ankle, hip, knee b. 1MWT, WS c. 6MWT d. falls e. ABC, FES-I f. GDS-15, HADS depression g. BBS, FR, ST h. RMI, TUG i. BI, FIM j. FAI, NEADL k. PADS, PASIPD, activity monitor l. NHP, SF-36 a. BI b. NEADL, FAI c. CSI, CBS a. 118 b. 118 c. 118 d. 118 a. 64 b. 94 c. 55 a. 42 b. 58 c. 42 d. 3 a. 177 b. 181 c. 28 d. 82 e. 14 f. 99 g. 298 h. 259 i. 1 j. 1 k. 121 l. 147 a. 34 b. 34 c. 34 a. Random b. Random c. Random d. Random a. Random b. c. a. Random b. c. d. a. Random b. Random c. d. e. f. Random g. h. i. j. k. l. a. b. Random c. a..543 (-1.831, 2.918) b..633 (-1.799, 3.66) c..154 (-1.393, 1.7) d (-.98, 2.933) a..31 (-.824, 1.426) b..155 (-.243,.553) c..346 (-.173,.865) a (-1.348,.415) b..213 (-.284,.71) c..185 (-.42,.772) d..165 (-.514,.844) a..43 (-.7,.868) b..477 (-.6,.96) c..568 (.295,.841) d..65 (-.389,.518) e..316 (-.14,.646) f..239 (-.654, 1.132) g..299 (.75,.524) h..278 (.37,.52) i..139 (-.25,.527) j (-.284,.359) k..538 (.41,.758) l..38 (-.284,.359) a..389 (.135,.625) b..135 (-.441,.712) c..517 (.31,.732) a. 97 b. 97 c. 94 d. 96 a. 8 b. 13 c. a. 54 b. c. 31 d. a. 53 b. 58 c. d. e. f. 78 g. h. i. 27 j. k. l. a. b. 69 c. a..717 b..835 c..113 d..995 a..263 b..11 c..2 a..262 b..11 c..83 d..69 a..425 b..79 c..938 d..58 e..359 f..178 g..599 h..496 i..92 j..89 k..79 l..55 a..869 b..19 c..982 Orthosis for walking a. comfortable gait speed a. WS a. 111 a. Random a..596 (-.55, 1.742) a. 87 a..77 Water-based exercises a. muscle strength a. strength: knee, leg a. 32 a. a..779 (.89, 1.468) a. a..741 a. NA b. balance b. BBS b. 32 b. Random b..599 (-.622, 1.821) b. 67 b..529 b. NA Interventions for a. motor function leg (synergy) a. FMA, Brunnstrom stages a. 63 a. Random a (-.24, 2.58) a. 75 a..913 a. NA somatosensory functions b. gait speed b. 1MWT, WS b. 51 b. b (-.659,.45) b. b..68 of the paretic leg c. balance c. BBS c. 54 c. Random c (-.255, 2.741) c. 85 c..958 Electrostimulation of the paretic leg NMS a. motor function leg (synergy) b. muscle tone c. muscle strength d. active range of motion ankle e. active range of motion knee f. gait speed g. cadence h. step length i. symmetry gait j. balance k. walking ability l. basic ADL EMG-NMS a. muscle tone b. basic ADL TENS a. muscle strength b. muscle tone c. active range of motion ankle plantar flexion d. active range of motion ankle dorsiflexion e. gait speed f. walking distance g. walking ability Electromyographic biofeedback for the paretic leg a. range of motion ankle dorsiflexion b. range of motion knee flexion c. step length d. gait speed e. EMG activity a. FMA, Brunnstrom stages b. CSS, H-reflex, MAS, SI c. strength: flexion/extension knee, ankle d. ROM e. ROM f. 1MWT, 5MWT, EFAP floor, WS g. gait analysis h. gait analysis i. gait analysis j. BBS, balance k. EFAP up and go, FAC, MGH FAC, RMI, TCT, TUG l. BI a. SI, MAS b. BI, FIM a. strength: flexion/extension ankle, knee b. CSS, MAS c. ROM d. ROM e. WS f. 6MWT g. BI mobility, TUG a. ROM b. ROM c. gait analysis d. WS e. EMG registration a. 76 b. 259 c. 133 d. 112 e. 57 f. 215 g. 7 h. 77 i. 4 j. 125 k. 237 l. 114 a. 68 b. 68 a. 135 b. 178 c. 91 d. 91 e. 17 f. 79 g. 195 a. 13 b. 52 c. 87 d. 34 e. 5 a. b. c. d. e. Random f. Random g. h. i. j. k. Random l. a. b. a. b. Random c. d. Random e. f. g. a. b. Random c. d. Random e. a..448 (.4,.891) b..274 (.34,.514) c..384 (.45,.722) d..284 (-.88,.656) e..64 (-.891, 1.18) f..342 (-.82,.766) g..131 (-.34,.61) h (-.757,.146) i (-.671,.524) j..26 (-.14,.551) k..132 (-.33,.568) l..293 (-.68,.655) a..368 (-.11,.836) b..351 (-.118,.82) a..471 (.115,.827) b..357 (-.715, 1.43) c..245 ( ) d..53 (-.621,.727) e..232 (-.52,.516) f..451 (-.19,.921) g..616 (.32,.911) a (-.399,.376) b..192 (-.754, 1.138) c..416 (-.5,.838) d..514 (-.444, 1.472) e..268 (-.284,.821) a. b. 36 c. 28 d. e. 64 f. 59 g. h. i. j. 4 k. 65 l. 25 a. b. a. b. 86 c. d. 61 e. f. g. a. b. 61 c. d. 52 e. a..395 b..479 c..469 d..247 e..55 f..581 g..76 h..217 i..65 j..174 k..141 l..63 a..257 b..238 a..651 b..54 c..171 d..55 e..257 f..48 g..958 a..5 b..95 c.. d..247 e.. a. NA b. NA c. NA d. NA a. NA a. NA b. NA c. NA d. NA e. NS f. NA g. NS h. NS i. NS j. NA k. NS l. NS a. NA b. NA c. NA e. NA f. NS g. NS h. NS i. NS j. NS k. NS l. NA e. NS f. NA g. NS b. NA d. NA e. NS

13 1MWT, 1-meter walk test; 12MWT, 12-minute walk test; 3MWT, 3-minute walk test; 5MWT, 5-meter walk test; 6MWT, 6-minute walk test; 8MWT, 8-meter walk test; AAP, Adelaide activities profile; ABC, Activities-specific balance confidence scale; ADL, Activities of daily living; BBA, Brunel balance assessment; BBS, Berg balance scale; BI, Barthel index; BP, Blood pressure; BWD, Body-weight distribution; C, Chronic phase; CI, Confidence interval; CSS, Composite spasticity scale; CNS, Canadian neurological scale; DB, Dynamic balance; DST, Double support time; EFAP, Emory functional ambulation profile; EMS, Elderly mobility scale; ER, Early rehabilitation phase; FAC, Functional ambulation categories; FAI, Frenchay activities index; FES-I, Falls-efficacy scale; FIM, Functional independence measure; FMA, Fugl-meyer assessment; FR, Functional reach; FSST, Four square step test; GDS-15, Geriatric depression scale - 15;GRF, Ground reaction force; HADS, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; HR, Heart rate; LLFDI, Late life function and disability instrument; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; LRT, Lateral reach test; MAS, Modified ashworth scale; MAS*, Motor assessment scale; mefap, modified Emory functional ambulation profile; MI, Motricity index; MMAS*, modified Motor assessment scale; MRC, Medical research council; mrs, modified Rankin scale; NA, Not applicable; NEADL, Nottingham extended ADL index; NHP, Nottingham health profile; NIHSS, National institutes of health stroke scale; NS, Not significant; PADS, Physical activity and disability scale; PASIPD, Physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities; PASS, Postural assessment scale for stroke; QoL, Quality of life; RMI, Rivermead mobility index; RMA, Rivermead motor assessment; RMA GF, RMA gross function; RMA LT, RMA leg and trunk; ROM, Range of motion; RPE, Rating of perceived exertion; S, Significant; SA-SIP3, Stroke-adapted 3-item version of the sickness impact profile; SAS, Stroke activities scale; SES, Summary effect size; SF-36, 36-Item short form health survey; SB, Static balance; SI, Spasticity index; SIS, Stroke impact scale; SPPB, Short physical performance battery; SST, Single-support time; ST, Step test; STREAM, Stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument; STS, Sit-to-stand; TCT, Trunk control test; TIS, Trunk impairment scale; TMS, Toulouse motor scale; TUG, Timed up and go test; WAQ, Walking ability questionnaire; WD, Walking distance; WQ, Walking quality; WS, Walking speed gait analysis

14 TABLE S2B. Summary of the evidence for physical therapy interventions arm-hand activities Intervention Pooling possible for: Outcome measures N (pooling) Type effects model SES (95%CI) Hedges g Heterogeneity I 2 (%) Therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm Reflex-inhibiting positions and immobilization techniques for the paretic wrist and hand Air-splints around the paretic arm Supportive techniques or devices for the prevention or treatment of glenohumeral subluxation and/or hemiplegic shoulder pain Bilateral arm training a. passive range of motion shoulder external rotation b. passive range of motion shoulder internal rotation c. contracture shoulder d. pain (rest) e. pain (movement) f. basic ADL a. muscle tone b. pain c. passive range of motion a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle tone phase: ER phase: LR c. somatosensory function d. pain e. arm-hand activities a. motor function arm b. pain a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength c. arm-hand activities d. self-reported amount of arm-hand use daily life e. basic ADL (modified) Constraintinduced movement therapy Original CIMT a. arm-hand activities (n=1) b. self-reported amount of arm-hand use in daily life (n=1) c. self-reported quality of armhand movement in daily life (n=1) High-intensity mcimt a. motor function arm (synergy) phase: ER phase: C b. arm-hand activities c. self-reported amount of arm-hand use in daily life d. self-reported quality of armhand movement in daily life e. basic ADL Low-intensity mcimt a. motor function arm (synergy) phase: ER phase: LR phase: C b. arm-hand activities c. self-reported amount of a. ROM b. ROM c. ROM d. VAS e. VAS f. BI, mbi a. MAS, Tardieu, resistance b. pain c. ROM a. FMA b. MAS A, FMA d. VAS, FMA e. ARAT, TEMPA a. MAS* b. VAS, pain free days a. FMA, MSS b. GS, PS, strength: elbow, shoulder, WFMT weight c. ARAT, BBT, PPT, TEMPA, WMFT d. MAL e. FIM, BI, mbi a. WMFT b. MAL c. MAL a. FMA b. ARAT, WMFT c. MAL d. MAL e. FIM, mbi a. FMA b. ARAT, WFMT c. MAL d. MAL e. BI, FIM f. SIS a. 132 b. 72 c. 55 d. 6 e. 6 f. 49 a. 93 b. 62 c. 93 a. 25 b c. 41 d. 41 e. 18 a. 14 b. 13 a. 274 b. 163 c. 417 d. 241 e. 245 a. 222 b. 222 c. 222 a b. 348 c. 114 d. 187 e. 78 a b. 337 c a. b. Random c. d. Random e. Random f. a. b. Random c. a. Random b. Random c. Random d. Random e. a. b. Random a. Random b. c. d. Random e. a. b. c. a. Random Random b. c. Random d. e. Random a. Random b. c. Random a..171 (.31,.7) b (-1.97,.967) c..366 (-.153,.885) d..114 (-.869, 1.97) e (-1.67,.44) f (-.7,.388) a..89 (-.321,.499) b (-2.2, 1.37) c (-.523,.347) a..36 (-.496,.567) b (-.839,.632) (-.841, -.149).914 (.82, 1.746) c..35 (-1.78, 1.687) d (-1.431,.698) e..1 (-.296,.298) a (-.517,.145) b..274 (-.539, 1.86) a..194 (-.359,.746) b (-.321,.285) c..35 (-.157,.226) d. -.3 (-.418,.357) e (-.35,.197) a..538 (.271,.86) b..671 (.42,.941) c..87 (.534, 1.8) a..211 (-.763, 1.185) 1.32 (-.361, 2.425) (-1.351,.219) b..34 (.98,.511) c..727 (.51, 1.43) d..511 (.224,.797) e..62 (-1.54, 1.178) a..47 (.19,.623) (.73, 3.692) (-1.851, 1.42).394 (.17,.618) b..597 (.379,.815) c..764 (.452, 1.75) (3.68, 9.963) a. b. 69 c. d. 74 e. 54 f. a. b. 81 c. 34 a. 68 b. 79 c. 8 d. 67 e. a. 2 b. 67 a. 8 b. c. 4 d. 54 e. a. b. c. a b. 11 c. 66 d. 33 e. 83 a b. 41 c. 57 Statistical power a..135 b..57 c..218 d..67 e..198 f..82 a..67 b..57 c..66 a..56 b c..132 d..17 e..5 a..162 b..274 a..281 b..51 c..61 d..61 e..65 a..927 b..988 c..999 a b..676 c..898 d..856 e..57 a b..997 c Difference between poststroke phases a. NA b. NA c. NA d. NA e. NA f. NA b. NA c. NA b. S e. NA a. NA b. NA d. NA e. NS a. NA b. NA c. NA a. S e. S a. S c. S

15 Robotic-assisted arm training Unilateral shoulderelbow robotics Bilateral elbow-wrist robotics arm-hand use in daily life phase: ER phase: LR phase: C d. self-reported quality of armhand movement in daily life phase: ER phase: LR phase: C e. basic ADL f. arm-hand related quality of life a. motor function arm (synergy) b. motor function arm proximal (synergy) c. motor function arm distal (synergy) d. muscle strength e. muscle strength proximal f. muscle strength distal g. muscle tone h. pain i. arm-hand activities j. basic ADL k. quality of life a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength phase: ER phase: C a. FMA, CMMSA, MSS b. FMA, AMAT c. FMA, AMAT, CMMSA, MSS d. MP, MRC, strength: elbow, shoulder e. MP, MRC, strength: elbow, shoulder f. GS, MRC g. MAS h. Pain, FMA, CMMSA i. ARAT, WMFT, BBT j. FIM k. SIS a. FMA b. MRC d e. 233 f. 36 a. 327 b. 283 c. 224 d. 278 e. 147 f. 56 g. 326 h. 171 i. 261 j. 133 k. 198 a. 62 b d. Random e. f. a. b. c. d. e. f. Random g. Random h. i. j. k. a. b (.339, 2.57).651 (.453,.849) d..647 (.345,.949) (2.77, 6.424) (.322, 2.548).55 (.354,.746) e..449 (.192,.76) f (-.891,.368) a..195 (-.13,.44) b..339 (.115,.563) c..63 (-.188,.313) d..475 (.244,.76) e..641 (.312,.969) f..289 (-.544, 1.122) g (-.585,.415) h..397 (.91,.73) i..22 (-.22,.461) j..37 (-.279,.353) k..18 (-.98,.458) a..894 (.48, 1.381) b (.57, 1.574) (.891, 2.222).433 (-.332, 1.197) 35 d e. f. a. b. c. d. 42 e. 48 f. 6 g. 78 h. i. j. k. a. b d e..846 f..14 a..343 b..697 c..69 d..931 e..913 f..154 g..11 h..64 i..335 j..54 k..199 a..841 b d. S e. NS f. NS e. NS f. NA g. NS h. NS i. NS j. NS k. NA b. S Shoulder-elbow-wristhand robotics Mental practice with motor imagery Mirror therapy for the paretic arm Virtual reality training for the paretic arm Electrostimulation of the paretic arm NMS wrist/finger extensors a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength distal a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength c. arm-hand activities d. basic ADL a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle tone c. pain d. arm-hand activities phase: LR (n=1) phase: C a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle tone c. arm-hand activities (unilateral) d. arm-hand activities (bilateral) e. basic ADL a. motor function arm (synergy) b. active range of motion c. muscle strength d. arm-hand activities a. FMA, CMMSA b. GS a. FMA b. MI, GS, JTHFT, strength c. ARAT, AFT, JTHFT d. BI, FIM a. FMA b. MAS, Tardieu c. VAS d. ARAT, WMFT a. FMA b. MAS, spasticity c. WMFT, BBT d. ABILHAND, CAHAI e. BI, FIM a. FMA b. ROM c. GS, PS, MI d. ARAT a. 36 b. 36 a. 149 b. 149 c. 246 d. 151 a. 112 b. 76 c. 112 d a. 158 b. 44 c. 89 d. 38 e. 63 a. 49 b. 48 c. 69 d. 82 a. Random b. a. b. Random c. Random d. Random a. Random b. c. Random d. Random a. b. c. d. Random e. a. Random b. Random c. Random d. Random a..67 (-1.397, 1.531) b..57 (-.62, 1.22) a..174 (-.118,.466) b..778 (-.162, 1.719) c..553 (.11,.997) d..74 (-.244,.392) a..391 (-.146,.928) b..41 (-.35,.856) c..362 (-.245,.969) d..293 (-.727, 1.312) 1.57 (.931, 2.28) -.7 (-.55,.492) a..192 (-.1,.485) b (-1.159, -.124) c..162 (-.212,.535) d..472 (-.427, 1.37) e..81 (.293, 1.39) a..53 (-1.354, 1.461) b..822 (-.391, 2.36) c (-1.324,.465) d..148 (-.87, 1.13) a. 75 b. a. 29 b. 83 c. 63 d. a. 52 b. c. 52 d a. b. c. d. 5 e. 48 a. 84 b. 76 c. 71 d. 79 a..53 b..37 a..154 b..98 c..954 d..68 a..434 b..335 c..378 d a..183 b..421 c..98 d..248 e..735 a..53 b..918 c..321 d..9 b. NA d. S b. NA e. NS c. NA

16 NMS wrist/finger flexors/extensors a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength c. arm-hand activities NMS shoulder a. motor function arm (synergy) b. range of motion c. pain d. subluxation EMG-NMS wrist/finger extensors a. motor function arm (synergy) b. active range of motion c. muscle strength d. muscle tone e. arm-hand activities a. mfma b. JTHFT c. BBT a. FMA b. ROM c. VAS d. subluxation (x-ray) a. FMA, CMMSA b. ROM c. GP, MI, strength, GS, JTHFT d. MAS e. ARAT, BBT, JTHFT, 1CMT, FTHUE a. 41 b. 23 c. 41 a. 32 b. 58 c. 223 d. 19 a. 49 b. 61 c. 79 d. 28 e. 162 a. b. c. a. b. c. Random d. Random a. b. Random c. Random d. e. a..95 (.285, 1.525) b..878 (.46, 1.711) c..577 (-.27, 1.181) a..489 (-.185, 1.163) b (-.649,.346) c..94 (-.498,.687) d..579 (.151, 1.8) a..578 (.36, 1.119) b (.282, 2.3) c..58 (-.192, 1.28) d..518 (-.184, 1.221) e..718 (.47, 1.28) a. b. c. 13 a. 33 b. 18 c. 68 d. 5 a. b. 6 c. 6 d. e. 49 a..657 b..429 c..341 a..219 b..8 c..94 d..924 a..398 b..96 c..783 d..215 e..971 a. NA b. NA c. NA e. NS EMG-NMS wrist/finger flexors/extensors a. motor function arm (synergy) b. arm-hand activities TENS a. muscle tone b. basic ADL Electromyographic a. motor function arm biofeedback of the paretic (synergy) arm b. active range of motion c. arm-hand activities Trunk restraint a. active range of motion b. arm-hand activities c. self-reported amount of Interventions for somatosensory functions of the paretic arm arm-hand use in daily life a. motor function arm (synergy) b. muscle strength c. muscle tone d. somatosensory function e. pain f. arm-hand activities g. basic ADL a. FMA, AMAT b. WMFT, AMAT a. MAS b. BI a. FMA, Brunnstrom stages b. ROM c. UEFT a. ROM b. WMFT, BBT c. MAL a. FMA, Brunnstrom stages b. GS, PS, MI, grasping c. MAS A, FMA, sensory tests e. VAS, FMA f. ARAT, FMC g. BI, FE a. 31 b. 31 a. 14 b. 88 a. 69 b. 147 c. 12 a. 46 b. 58 c. 28 a. 17 b. 15 c. 65 d. 273 e. 41 f. 266 g. 168 a. b. a. Random b. Random a. b. c. a. b. c. a. Random b. c. d. e. Random f. g. Random a..617 (-.66, 1.31) b..578 (-.18, 1.263) a..47 (-.432, 1.372) b..972 (-.45, 2.394) a..39 (-.75,.856) b..269 (-.51,.589) c..211 (-.166,.587) a..69 (-.489,.626) b..66 (-.427,.559) c (-1.636, -.169) a..456 (-.28,.939) b..219 (-.88,.526) c..548 (.99,.997) d..358 (.115,.66) e (-1.431,.698) f..172 (-.62,.45) g..118 (-.426,.662) a. b. 22 a. 81 b. 89 a. b. c. a. b. c. a..315 b..284 a..536 b..962 a..282 b..286 c CMT, 1-cup moving test; ADL, Activities of daily living; AFT, Arm function test; AMAT, Arm motor ability test; ARAT, Action research arm test; BBT, Box and block test; BI, Barthel index; C, Chronic phase; CAHAI, Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory; CI, Confidence interval; CMMSA, Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment; ER, Early rehabilitation phase;fe, Functional evaluation; FIM, Functional independence measure; FMC, Fine motor control; FMA, Fugl-meyer assessment; FTHUE, Functional test for the hemiplegic upper extremity; GP, Grip power; GS, Grip strength; JTHFT, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test; LR, Late rehabilitation phase; MAL, Motor activity log; MAS, Modified ashworth scale; MAS*, Motor assessment scale; mfma, modified Fugl-meyer assessment; MP, Motor power; MRC, Medical research council; MSS, Motor status scale; mbi, modified Barthel index; NA, Not applicable; NS, Not significant; NSA, Nottingham sensory assessment; PPT, Perdue pegboard test; PS, Pinch strength; ROM, Range of motion; S, Significant; SES, Summary effect size; SIS, Stroke impact scale; TEMPA, Test d evaluation des membres supérieurs de personnes agéés; UEFT, Upper extremity function test; VAS, Visual analogue scale; WFMT, Wolf motor function test a. 51 b. c. d. 47 e. 67 f. g. 55 a..55 b..56 c..55 a..716 b..224 c..474 d..731 e..17 f..38 g..12 a. NA b. NA c. NA e. NA f. NS g. NS

Recovery of function after stroke: principles of motor rehabilitation

Recovery of function after stroke: principles of motor rehabilitation Recovery of function after stroke: principles of motor rehabilitation Horst Hummelsheim NRZ Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Leipzig Universität Leipzig Berlin, 13.11.2009 1 Target symptoms in motor

More information

CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS. Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence Tables Management of the Upper Extremity following Stroke

CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS. Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence Tables Management of the Upper Extremity following Stroke CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS Management of the Upper Extremity following Stroke Hebert, D, Teasell, R (Writing Group Chairs) on Behalf of the STROKE REHABILITATION Writing Group 2015 Heart

More information

Chronic cerebral vascular accident: rehabilitation

Chronic cerebral vascular accident: rehabilitation DOI: 10.5935/0104-7795.20120011 Authorship: Associação Brasileira de Medicina Física e Reabilitação Conclusion: July 1, 2011 Participants: Thaís Tavares Terranova, Fabiola Olea Albieri, Munique Dias de

More information

Home Exercise Program Progression and Components of the LTP Intervention. HEP Activities at Every Session Vital signs monitoring

Home Exercise Program Progression and Components of the LTP Intervention. HEP Activities at Every Session Vital signs monitoring Home Exercise Program Progression and Components of the LTP Intervention HEP Activities at Every Session Vital signs monitoring Blood pressure, heart rate, Borg Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and oxygen

More information

University of Manitoba - MPT: Neurological Clinical Skills Checklist

University of Manitoba - MPT: Neurological Clinical Skills Checklist Name: Site: Assessment Skills Observed Performed Becoming A. Gross motor function i. Describe movement strategies (quality, devices, timeliness, independence): supine sidelying sit stand supine long sitting

More information

Postural instability Hypokinesia Rigidity Tremor Forward flexed posture. pain million people 50+ years old 10 most populated countries

Postural instability Hypokinesia Rigidity Tremor Forward flexed posture. pain million people 50+ years old 10 most populated countries 4.1-4.6 million people 50+ years old 10 most populated countries Cyndi Robinson, PT, PhD University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA Progressive neurodegenerative disorder Selective neuronal loss

More information

Content. Theory. Demonstration. Development of Robotic Therapy Theory behind of the Robotic Therapy Clinical Practice in Robotic Therapy

Content. Theory. Demonstration. Development of Robotic Therapy Theory behind of the Robotic Therapy Clinical Practice in Robotic Therapy Robotic Therapy Commission Training 2011/2012 in Advance Stroke Rehabilitation 7 Jan 2012 Helen LUK, Senior Physiotherapist Clare CHAO, Physiotherapist I Queen Elizabeth Hospital Content Theory Development

More information

What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis

What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis JM Veerbeek EEH van Wegen RPS van Peppen PJ van der Wees EJ Hendriks MB Rietberg G Kwakkel PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987

More information

What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Janne Marieke Veerbeek 1, Erwin van Wegen 1, Roland van Peppen 2, Philip Jan van der Wees 3, Erik Hendriks 4,

More information

Predicting Recovery after a Stroke

Predicting Recovery after a Stroke Predicting Recovery after a Stroke James Lynskey, PT, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, A.T. Still University October 13, 2018 Wouldn t it be great if we could predict if a stroke

More information

Restoration of Reaching and Grasping Functions in Hemiplegic Patients with Severe Arm Paralysis

Restoration of Reaching and Grasping Functions in Hemiplegic Patients with Severe Arm Paralysis Restoration of Reaching and Grasping Functions in Hemiplegic Patients with Severe Arm Paralysis Milos R. Popovic* 1,2, Vlasta Hajek 2, Jenifer Takaki 2, AbdulKadir Bulsen 2 and Vera Zivanovic 1,2 1 Institute

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION For stroke patients, in what ways does robot-assisted therapy improve upper extremity performance in the areas of motor impairment, muscle power, and strength?

More information

Gait Assessment & Implications in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Gait Assessment & Implications in Geriatric Rehabilitation Gait Assessment & Implications in Geriatric Rehabilitation Therapy Network Seminars, Inc. Nicole Dawson, PT, PhD, GCS Learning Objectives Following completion of this webinar, participants will be able

More information

Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review

Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review JAN JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING REVIEW PAPER Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review Marijke Rensink, Marieke Schuurmans, Eline Lindeman & Thóra Hafsteinsdóttir Accepted

More information

Can Constraint Induced Therapy Style Intervention Be Effectively Incorporated into Standard Neurorehabilitation?

Can Constraint Induced Therapy Style Intervention Be Effectively Incorporated into Standard Neurorehabilitation? Pacific University CommonKnowledge Physical Function CATs OT Critically Appraised Topics 2009 Can Constraint Induced Therapy Style Intervention Be Effectively Incorporated into Standard Neurorehabilitation?

More information

Date: December 4 th, 2012 CLINICAL SCENARIO:

Date: December 4 th, 2012 CLINICAL SCENARIO: 1 Title: There is strong support for the effectiveness of mcimt compared to conventional therapy in improving physical function and occupational performance of the affected upper extremity in adults 0

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Smania, N., Gandolfi, M., Paolucci, S., Iosa, M., Ianes, P., Recchia, S., & Farina, S. (2012). Reduced-intensity modified constraint-induced movement therapy versus conventional

More information

Exercise, Physical Therapy and Fall Prevention

Exercise, Physical Therapy and Fall Prevention Exercise, Physical Therapy and Fall Prevention University of Davis Medical Center Rosy Chow Neuro Clinical Specialist Physical Therapist Outline of Talk Role of Physical Therapy in care of people with

More information

LECTURE 8: OPTIMISING UPPER LIMB FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE. Understand the factors that can inhibit optimal recovery of arm function.

LECTURE 8: OPTIMISING UPPER LIMB FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE. Understand the factors that can inhibit optimal recovery of arm function. LECTURE 8: OPTIMISING UPPER LIMB FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE Understand the factors that can inhibit optimal recovery of arm function. o Shoulder subluxation Incidence as high as 81% Downward traction leads

More information

SAEBO CASE STUDIES & RESEARCH

SAEBO CASE STUDIES & RESEARCH SaeboFlex Research Doucet B, Mettler, J. Pilot Study Combining Electrical Stimulation and a Dynamic Hand Orthosis for Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, March/April,

More information

Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 Summary - Physiotherapy

Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 Summary - Physiotherapy Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 Summary - Physiotherapy This summary is a quick reference to the recommendations in the Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 most relevant to physiotherapy.

More information

LEAPS (Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke) Home Exercise Program (HEP) Therapist Intervention Manual

LEAPS (Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke) Home Exercise Program (HEP) Therapist Intervention Manual LEAPS (Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke) Home Exercise Program (HEP) Therapist Intervention Manual Brooks Rehabilitation Center, Jacksonville, FL Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL Long Beach Memorial

More information

In this presentation:

In this presentation: Clinical Studies In this presentation: Total number of studies Publications Key clinical studies Israel: sub acute stroke Germany: sub acute stroke Italy: chronic stroke Japan: sub acute stroke New article

More information

Hemiplegic Shoulder. Incidence & Rationale. Shoulder Pain Assessment & Treatment

Hemiplegic Shoulder. Incidence & Rationale. Shoulder Pain Assessment & Treatment Hemiplegic Shoulder Jeane Davis Fyfe OT, Senior Therapist Incidence & Rationale Up to 72% of stroke survivors will experience shoulder pain Shoulder pain may inhibit patient participation in rehabilitation

More information

ORTHOPEDIC PHYSIOTHERAPY EVALUATION FORM. Age: Gender: M/F IP/OP

ORTHOPEDIC PHYSIOTHERAPY EVALUATION FORM. Age: Gender: M/F IP/OP ORTHOPEDIC PHYSIOTHERAPY EVALUATION FORM NAME: DATE: Age: Gender: M/F IP/OP Occupation: Referred by: Address: Phone Number: Registration Number: Civil Status: Diagnosis: Chief Complaints: Past Medical

More information

Early Intensive Gait Training vs. Conventional Low Intensity Gait Training in Individuals Post Stroke

Early Intensive Gait Training vs. Conventional Low Intensity Gait Training in Individuals Post Stroke Pacific University CommonKnowledge PT Critically Appraised Topics School of Physical Therapy 2012 Early Intensive Gait Training vs. Conventional Low Intensity Gait Training in Individuals Post Stroke Healani

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION For patients with acute cerebral vascular accident, is virtual reality gaming more effective than standard recreational therapy for the improvement of

More information

Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission

Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission A separate copy of this form must accompany each policy submitted for review. Policies submitted without this form will not be considered for review.

More information

The Handmaster NMS1 surface FES neuroprosthesis in hemiplegic patients

The Handmaster NMS1 surface FES neuroprosthesis in hemiplegic patients The Handmaster NMS1 surface FES neuroprosthesis in hemiplegic patients R. H. Nathan 1,2, H. P. Weingarden 1,3, A. Dar 1,2, A. Prager 1 1 NESS Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Systems Ltd. 2 Biomedical

More information

BACKGROUND. Paul Taylor. The National Clinical FES Centre Salisbury UK. Reciprocal Inhibition. Sensory Input Boosted by Electrical Stimulation

BACKGROUND. Paul Taylor. The National Clinical FES Centre Salisbury UK. Reciprocal Inhibition. Sensory Input Boosted by Electrical Stimulation The REAcH project. A Randomised Controlled Trial of an Accelerometer Triggered Functional Electrica Stimulation Device For Recovery of Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients. Paul Taylor The National

More information

An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke

An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke Alt Murphy et al. BMC Neurology (2015) 15:29 DOI 10.1186/s12883-015-0292-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke Margit Alt Murphy

More information

Berg Balance Scale. CVA, Parkinson Disease, Pediatrics

Berg Balance Scale. CVA, Parkinson Disease, Pediatrics CVA, Parkinson Disease, Pediatrics CVA Highly recommended for inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation Recommended for acute care Parkinson s Disease Recommended for H and Y stages 2 and 3 G code-changing

More information

Are randomised controlled trials telling us what rehabilitation interventions work?

Are randomised controlled trials telling us what rehabilitation interventions work? Are randomised controlled trials telling us what rehabilitation interventions work? Focus on stroke Jane Burridge March 6 th 2014 Neurorehabilitation: facts, fears and the future Overview Stroke recovery

More information

University of Dundee. Published in: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. DOI: / CD pub2. Publication date: 2010

University of Dundee. Published in: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. DOI: / CD pub2. Publication date: 2010 University of Dundee Simultaneous bilaternal training for improving arm function after stroke Coupar, Fiona; Pollock, Alex; Van Wijck, Frederike; Morris, Jacqui; Langhorne, Peter Published in: Cochrane

More information

Review of Selected Physical Therapy Interventions for School Age Children with Disabilities

Review of Selected Physical Therapy Interventions for School Age Children with Disabilities Review of Selected Physical Therapy Interventions for School Age Children with Disabilities Prepared for the Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education EXECUTIVE SUMMARY by Susan K. Effgen University.

More information

Dominican University of California Dominican Scholar Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you.

Dominican University of California Dominican Scholar Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Dominican University of California Dominican Scholar Occupational Therapy Critically Appraised Papers Series Occupational Therapy 2017 Critically Appraised Paper for The Effect of Modified Constraint-Induced

More information

FOUNDATION IN HUMAN BODY FUNCTION

FOUNDATION IN HUMAN BODY FUNCTION SOLOMON ISLANDS NATIONAL UNIVERSITY School of Nursing and Allied Health Sciences CB 512 FOUNDATION IN HUMAN BODY FUNCTION FINAL EXAMINATION SEMESTER 1, 2017 1 SCHOOL OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES

More information

Considerations in the selection of patients for Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy

Considerations in the selection of patients for Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Considerations in the selection of patients for Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy The best and the worst surgery I have ever been associated with. A therapist's perspective Dean Morgan, PT Disclosure Statement

More information

THE EFFECTS OF AQUATIC THERAPY, BODY WEIGHT SUPPORT TREADMILL TRAINING, AND HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY ON GAIT IN A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC STROKES

THE EFFECTS OF AQUATIC THERAPY, BODY WEIGHT SUPPORT TREADMILL TRAINING, AND HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY ON GAIT IN A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC STROKES THE EFFECTS OF AQUATIC THERAPY, BODY WEIGHT SUPPORT TREADMILL TRAINING, AND HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY ON GAIT IN A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC STROKES A Capstone Seminar Paper for PTY 769: Capstone Experience:

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Huseyinsinoglu, B. E., Ozdincler, A. R., & Krespi, Y. (2012). Bobath concept versus constraint-induced movement therapy to improve arm functional recovery in stroke patients:

More information

Supplementary webappendix

Supplementary webappendix Supplementary webappendix This webappendix formed part of the original submission and has been peer reviewed. We post it as supplied by the authors. Supplement to: Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EEH,

More information

Robotic-Assisted, Body-Weight Supported Treadmill Training in Individuals Following Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Robotic-Assisted, Body-Weight Supported Treadmill Training in Individuals Following Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Case Report Robotic-Assisted, Body-Weight Supported Treadmill Training in Individuals Following Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Background and Purpose. Performance of therapist-assisted, bodyweight

More information

1-Apley scratch test.

1-Apley scratch test. 1-Apley scratch test. The patient attempts to touch the opposite scapula to test range of motion of the shoulder. 1-Testing abduction and external rotation( +ve sign touch the opposite scapula, -ve sign

More information

Mirror Therapy for the Lower-Extremities Post- Stroke

Mirror Therapy for the Lower-Extremities Post- Stroke Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository March 2015 Mirror Therapy for the Lower-Extremities Post- Stroke Lucas David Crosby The University of Western Ontario

More information

9/9/2016. By: Erica Ogilvie Rehab 540 Stroke Rehab University of Alberta Northwestern Ontario Regional Stroke Network

9/9/2016. By: Erica Ogilvie Rehab 540 Stroke Rehab University of Alberta Northwestern Ontario Regional Stroke Network By: Erica Ogilvie Rehab 540 Stroke Rehab University of Alberta Northwestern Ontario Regional Stroke Network Referred to as J.S. 60 year old Caucasian female 6 weeks post ischemic stroke Middle Cerebral

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Dahl, A., Askim, T., Stock, R., Langørgen, E., Lydersen, S., & Indredavik, B. (2008). Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke:

More information

Venugopal Durairaj, Specialist Physiotherapist Stroke team Virgin Healthcare East Staffordshire

Venugopal Durairaj, Specialist Physiotherapist Stroke team Virgin Healthcare East Staffordshire Learning from contracture management in Stroke - recent review & views of therapists in DOC Venugopal Durairaj, Specialist Physiotherapist Stroke team Virgin Healthcare East Staffordshire Assistive Technology

More information

CommonKnowledge. Pacific University. Leah Rybolt Pacific University. Recommended Citation. Notice to Readers

CommonKnowledge. Pacific University. Leah Rybolt Pacific University. Recommended Citation. Notice to Readers Pacific University CommonKnowledge PT Critically Appraised Topics School of Physical Therapy 2014 A comparison of strength training to standard care at Khayelitsha Special School in improving motor function

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Yin, C., Sien, N., Ying, L., Chung, S., & Leng, D. (2014). Virtual reality for upper extremity rehabilitation in early stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Clinical

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION What is the effectiveness of a modified constraint-induced therapy (mcit) intervention compared to conventional rehabilitation methods for the rehabilitation

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION To what extent do the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke persist after the intervention

More information

Significance of Walking Speed. Maggie Benson Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Physical Therapy

Significance of Walking Speed. Maggie Benson Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Physical Therapy Significance of Walking Speed Maggie Benson Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Physical Therapy The 6 th Vital Sign Walking speed is considered the 6 th vital sign A valid and reliable measure

More information

THE ROLE OF MIRROR THERAPY IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS CASE STUDY

THE ROLE OF MIRROR THERAPY IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN POST-STROKE PATIENTS CASE STUDY Science, Movement and Health, Vol. XIV, ISSUE 2 Supplement, 2014 September 2014, 14 (2, Supplement): 470-475 Original article THE ROLE OF MIRROR THERAPY IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF UPPER LIMB FUNCTION IN POST-STROKE

More information

Realtà virtuale: l esperienza dell IRCCS Medea

Realtà virtuale: l esperienza dell IRCCS Medea Emilia Biffi Realtà virtuale: l esperienza dell IRCCS Medea Emilia Biffi, C. Maghini, E. Beretta, E. Diella, D. Panzeri, F. Brunati, M. Delle Fave, S. Strazzer, A.C. Turconi, G. Reni Scientific Institute

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Cui, B. J., Wang, D. Q., Qiu, J. Q., Huang, L. G., Zeng, F. S., Zhang, Q.,... Sun, Q. S. (2015). Effects of a 12-hour neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment program

More information

AHA Scientific Statement

AHA Scientific Statement AHA Scientific Statement Comprehensive Overview of Nursing and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Care of the Stroke Patient A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Elaine L. Miller, PhD,

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION Is mirror therapy more effective in a, or individually, on sensorimotor function, activities of daily living, quality of life, and visuospatial neglect

More information

C-MILL PRE-TRAINING MATERIAL

C-MILL PRE-TRAINING MATERIAL 4 C-MILL PRE-TRAINING MATERIAL 1 Background information The ability to adjust gait to the requirements of the environment is related to fall risk. Someone must be able to avoid a doorstep, puddle of water

More information

Flexibility Exercises for Beginners

Flexibility Exercises for Beginners Flexibility Exercises for Beginners 5 flexibility exercises that you can do anytime to give you some get up and go Hello and welcome to your free Flexibility Exercises. Flexibility is needed to perform

More information

MOTOR EVALUATION SCALE FOR UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE PATIENTS (MESUPES-arm and MESUPES-hand)

MOTOR EVALUATION SCALE FOR UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE PATIENTS (MESUPES-arm and MESUPES-hand) MOTOR EVALUATION SCALE FOR UPPER EXTREMITY IN STROKE PATIENTS (MESUPES-arm and MESUPES-hand) Name patient: Test date - hour: Name examiner: Duration of the test: min Handedness: right/left Support sitting

More information

FOCUSED CLINICAL QUESTION (PICO

FOCUSED CLINICAL QUESTION (PICO Prepared by: Sophie Warden, Mia Bellafronte, Kevin Mai, Abbi Feltner-Smith Date: 5/1/17 Disclaimer: This CAT was developed in conjunction with an evidence-based practice course. It is not designed to represent

More information

Localizing and Characterizing Neural Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury

Localizing and Characterizing Neural Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury PVA Summer 2012 Expo The Effect of Rehabilitation on the Neurobiology of MS and SCI Las Vegas, NV, August 30, 2012 Localizing and Characterizing Neural Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury Keith Tansey, MD,

More information

A ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR UPPER-LIMB EXERCISES TO PROMOTE RECOVERY OF MOTOR FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE

A ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR UPPER-LIMB EXERCISES TO PROMOTE RECOVERY OF MOTOR FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE A ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR UPPER-LIMB EXERCISES TO PROMOTE RECOVERY OF MOTOR FUNCTION FOLLOWING STROKE Peter S. Lum 1,2, Machiel Van der Loos 1,2, Peggy Shor 1, Charles G. Burgar 1,2 1 Rehab R&D Center, VA Palo

More information

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Intro to Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Conditions. PT Evaluation. PT Evaluation

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Intro to Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Conditions. PT Evaluation. PT Evaluation Slide 1 Intro to Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Conditions PTA 103 Introduction to Clinical Practice 2 Slide 2 Mental status: consciousness, attention, orientation, cognition Communication: speech

More information

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) Wu, C., Huang, P., Chen, Y., Lin, K., & Yang, H. (2013). Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives

More information

3/16/2016 INCIDENCE. Each year, approximately 795,000 people suffer a stroke. On average, someone in the United States has a stroke every 40 seconds

3/16/2016 INCIDENCE. Each year, approximately 795,000 people suffer a stroke. On average, someone in the United States has a stroke every 40 seconds USING THE PRINCIPLES OF NEUROPLASTICITY AND MOTOR LEARNING TO IMPROVE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES IN STROKE SURVIVORS: TRANSLATING THE EVIDENCE INTO PRACTICE Angie Reimer MOT/OTR adreimer@embarqmail.com Each year,

More information

Clinical Problem Solving 1: Using the Short Form Berg Balance Scale to Detect Change in Post Acute Stroke Patients

Clinical Problem Solving 1: Using the Short Form Berg Balance Scale to Detect Change in Post Acute Stroke Patients Clinical Problem Solving 1: Using the Short Form Berg Balance Scale to Detect Change in Post Acute Stroke Patients By Caroline Owen November 12, 2015 Purpose 1. To present the physical therapy evaluation

More information

테이핑을이용한건측억제유도운동이만성뇌졸중환자의상지기능에미치는영향

테이핑을이용한건측억제유도운동이만성뇌졸중환자의상지기능에미치는영향 1) 테이핑을이용한건측억제유도운동이만성뇌졸중환자의상지기능에미치는영향, 1, 2 The Effect of Modified CIMT Combined with Kinesio-Taping on Upper Limb Function in Hemiplegic Patients Myung-kwon Kim, PT, MS, Sang-ku Ji, PT, MS, Hye-jin Jun,

More information

Noyes Knee Institute Rehabilitation Protocol: Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction

Noyes Knee Institute Rehabilitation Protocol: Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction Noyes Knee Institute Rehabilitation Protocol: Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction Brace: Bivalved cylinder cast Custom medial unloader or hinged soft tissue brace minimum goals: 0-90 0-110 0-120 0-130 Weight

More information

Benefits of Weight bearing increased awareness of the involved side decreased fear improved symmetry regulation of muscle tone

Benefits of Weight bearing increased awareness of the involved side decreased fear improved symmetry regulation of muscle tone From the information we have gathered during our Evaluation, the Clinical Reasoning we used to identify key problem areas and the Goals Established with functional outcomes we now have enough information

More information

Shoulder pain management in stroke

Shoulder pain management in stroke Mædica - a Journal of Clinical Medicine ORIGIN RIGINAL PAPERS Shoulder pain management in stroke D. Poenaru, MD, PhD; D. Cinteza, MD, PhD; S. Popescu, MD; L. Ionita, MD; M. Mateescu, MD National Institute

More information

The Effects Of Robot-Assisted Gait Training And Task-Specific Training On ADL Function And Mobility For A Patient After A Stroke: A Case Report

The Effects Of Robot-Assisted Gait Training And Task-Specific Training On ADL Function And Mobility For A Patient After A Stroke: A Case Report University of New England DUNE: DigitalUNE Case Report Papers Physical Therapy Student Papers 12-8-2014 The Effects Of Robot-Assisted Gait Training And Task-Specific Training On ADL Function And Mobility

More information

Erigo User Script 1. Erigo Background Information. 2. Intended use and indications

Erigo User Script 1. Erigo Background Information. 2. Intended use and indications Erigo User Script 1. Erigo Background Information The Erigo was developed in collaboration with the Spinal Cord Injury Center at the Balgrist University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland and the Orthopaedic

More information

Chapter 20: Muscular Fitness and Assessment

Chapter 20: Muscular Fitness and Assessment Chapter 20: Muscular Fitness and Assessment American College of Sports Medicine. (2010). ACSM's resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (6th ed.). New York: Lippincott, Williams

More information

Anatomy, Biomechanics, Work Physiology, and Anthropometry. After completing and understanding of the current chapter students should be able to:

Anatomy, Biomechanics, Work Physiology, and Anthropometry. After completing and understanding of the current chapter students should be able to: Chapter 2 Anatomy, Biomechanics, Work Physiology, and Anthropometry Learning outcomes: After completing and understanding of the current chapter students should be able to: Describe the anatomical structure

More information

Table e-1 Commonly used scales and outcome measures

Table e-1 Commonly used scales and outcome measures Table e-1 Commonly used scales and outcome measures Objective outcome Measure Scale range EDSS e14 Disability Divided into 20 half steps ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) FSs 14 Disability

More information

Background: Traditional rehabilitation after total joint replacement aims to improve the muscle strength of lower limbs,

Background: Traditional rehabilitation after total joint replacement aims to improve the muscle strength of lower limbs, REVIEWING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BALANCE TRAINING BEFORE AND AFTER TOTAL KNEE AND TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: PROTOCOL FOR A SYSTEMATIC RE- VIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Background: Traditional rehabilitation after

More information

A comparison of two patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome J O H N C O R S I N O, S P T

A comparison of two patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome J O H N C O R S I N O, S P T A comparison of two patients with Guillain-Barre Syndrome J O H N C O R S I N O, S P T Guillain-Barre Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy Highly diverse presentation, course, outcome Miller-Fisher:

More information

SUMMARY. Applied exercise physiology in rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy

SUMMARY. Applied exercise physiology in rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy S SUMMARY Applied exercise physiology in rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy Summary Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of physical disability in childhood. CP is defined as a group

More information

HABITUAL AMBULATORY ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT POST-STROKE

HABITUAL AMBULATORY ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT POST-STROKE HABITUAL AMBULATORY ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT POST-STROKE By SHARON BARAK A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

More information

Clinical Study Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in Patients with Hemiparesis

Clinical Study Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in Patients with Hemiparesis Stroke Research and Treatment Volume 2012, Article ID 820931, 5 pages doi:10.1155/2012/820931 Clinical Study Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in

More information

*Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX

*Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX The Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of Commonly Used Orthopedic Outcome Measures, Cancer Specific Measures, and Patient Reported Functional and Quality of Life Measures Justin E. Bird MD*, Joseph

More information

Passive and Active Exercises. Passive exercises. Passive exercises. Range-of-Motion exercises Stretching

Passive and Active Exercises. Passive exercises. Passive exercises. Range-of-Motion exercises Stretching Passive and Active Exercises Marion Mueller DVM, CCRP, CVA University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna Passive exercises Range-of-Motion exercises Stretching Passive exercises Increased joint mobility Increased

More information

NDTA BASIC ADULT COURSE KEY TO COURSE CONTENT

NDTA BASIC ADULT COURSE KEY TO COURSE CONTENT Topic: Atypical Patterns of Movement Learning outcome(s) that pertain to occupational therapists 1. Identify the influence of atypical patterns of movement on: Postural alignment Transitional movements

More information

TASC Manual and Scoresheet Printing Suggestions

TASC Manual and Scoresheet Printing Suggestions TASC Manual and Scoresheet Printing Suggestions The manual (pages 2-21 of this packet) is meant to be printed in booklet form so that the final form is 8.5x5.5 inches in size (achieved by folding the printed

More information

STRENGTH TRAINING AFTER STROKE: EFFECTS ON MUSCLE FUNCTION, GAIT PERFORMANCE AND PERCEIVED PARTICIPATION

STRENGTH TRAINING AFTER STROKE: EFFECTS ON MUSCLE FUNCTION, GAIT PERFORMANCE AND PERCEIVED PARTICIPATION From the Department of Health Sciences, Division of Geriatrics, Lund University and the Department of Rehabilitation, Lund University Hospital, Sweden STRENGTH TRAINING AFTER STROKE: EFFECTS ON MUSCLE

More information

Brunel balance assessment (BBA)

Brunel balance assessment (BBA) Brunel balance assessment (BBA) Tyson, S Title Authors Type URL Brunel balance assessment (BBA) Tyson, S Published Date 2004 Monograph This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/4886/ USIR

More information

A Clinician s Perspective of the ViaTherapy App for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation

A Clinician s Perspective of the ViaTherapy App for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation A Clinician s Perspective of the ViaTherapy App for Upper Extremity Stroke Rehabilitation Anik Laneville, OT Reg. (Ont.) Best Practice Occupational Therapist CRSN Dana Guest BSc. PT Best Practice Physiotherapist

More information

Handling Skills Used in the Management of Adult Hemiplegia: A Lab Manual

Handling Skills Used in the Management of Adult Hemiplegia: A Lab Manual Handling Skills Used in the Management of Adult Hemiplegia: A Lab Manual 2nd Edition Isabelle M. Bohman, M.S., P.T., NDT Coordinator Instructor TM Published by Clinician s View Albuquerque, NM 505-880-0058

More information

Incorporating Balance, Resistance, and Aerobic Training into Therapy Sessions with a Patient who has MS: A Case Report

Incorporating Balance, Resistance, and Aerobic Training into Therapy Sessions with a Patient who has MS: A Case Report Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Case Reports 2017 Incorporating Balance, Resistance, and Aerobic Training into Therapy Sessions with a Patient who has MS: A Case Report Eric Callahan University of Iowa

More information

Electrical stimulation of the upper limb. Paul Taylor

Electrical stimulation of the upper limb. Paul Taylor Electrical stimulation of the upper limb Paul Taylor Three upper limb Pathways Shoulder subluxation Upper Limb Active Function Upper limb Passive All differ in aims but follow a similar 6 month protocol

More information

2/24/2014. Outline. Anterior Orthotic Management for the Chronic Post Stroke Patient. Terminology. Terminology ROM. Physical Evaluation

2/24/2014. Outline. Anterior Orthotic Management for the Chronic Post Stroke Patient. Terminology. Terminology ROM. Physical Evaluation Outline Anterior Orthotic Management for the Chronic Post Stroke Patient Physical Evaluation Design Considerations Orthotic Design Jason M. Jennings CPO, LPO, FAAOP jajennings@hanger.com Primary patterning

More information

BIOFEEDBACK AND HIPPOTHERAPY, FROM THE BOBATHCONCEPT, AS. HYPERTHERAPY WITH CONGENITAL HEMIPARESIS. (Daniël BENS, Belgium)

BIOFEEDBACK AND HIPPOTHERAPY, FROM THE BOBATHCONCEPT, AS. HYPERTHERAPY WITH CONGENITAL HEMIPARESIS. (Daniël BENS, Belgium) BIOFEEDBACK AND HIPPOTHERAPY, FROM THE BOBATHCONCEPT, AS HYPERTHERAPY WITH CONGENITAL HEMIPARESIS. (Daniël BENS, Belgium) Many techniques of treatment for the child with cerebral palsy have developed over

More information

Sports Rehabilitation & Performance Center Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Guidelines * Follow physician s modifications as prescribed

Sports Rehabilitation & Performance Center Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Guidelines * Follow physician s modifications as prescribed The following MPFL guidelines were developed by the Sports Rehabilitation and Performance Center team at Hospital for Special Surgery. Progression is based on healing constraints, functional progression

More information

Many upper extremity motor function outcome measures do

Many upper extremity motor function outcome measures do Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT; Pamela A. Catlin, EdD, PT; Michael Ellis, MPT; Audrey Link Archer, MPT; Bryn Morgan,

More information

Selective Motor Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity in Patients with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Selective Motor Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity in Patients with Spastic Cerebral Palsy Overview Selective Motor Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity in Patients with Spastic Cerebral Palsy Marcia Greenberg MS, PT* Loretta Staudt MS, PT* Eileen Fowler PT, PhD Selective Motor Control

More information

Building Better Balance

Building Better Balance Building Better Balance The Effects of MS on Balance Individuals with MS experience a decline in their balance due to various MS related impairments. Some of these impairments can be improved with exercise

More information

Dr Nancy Low Choy, Bond University, Gold Coast. Paige Hooper, Physiotherapist, Bond University, Gold Coast

Dr Nancy Low Choy, Bond University, Gold Coast. Paige Hooper, Physiotherapist, Bond University, Gold Coast Associations between vestibular system function, perceived confidence, falls efficacy, balance and mobility in older fallers undertaking home rehabilitation Dr Nancy Low Choy, Bond University, Gold Coast

More information

Therapy Manual DO NOT PRINT

Therapy Manual DO NOT PRINT Therapy Manual Contents 1. Shoulder 2. Shoulder and elbow a. Protraction: 1 DoF 1 b. Flexion: 1 DoF 1-6 c. Extension: 1 DoF 1-2 d. Abduction: 1 DoF 1-4 e. External rotation: 1 DoF 1-14 a. Combined shoulder

More information