[3] Coombs, C.H., 1964, A theory of data, New York: Wiley.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "[3] Coombs, C.H., 1964, A theory of data, New York: Wiley."

Esmond McGee
5 years ago
Views:

1 Bibliography [1] Birnbaum, A., 1968, Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee s ability, In F.M. Lord & M.R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp ), Reading (Mass.) Addison-Wesley. [2] Bol, G.W., 1994, Implicational scaling in child language acquisition: The order of production of Dutch verb constructions, In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Papers from the Dutch-German colloquium on language acquisition (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development), Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Institute for General Linguistics.

2 [3] Coombs, C.H., 1964, A theory of data, New York: Wiley. [4] De Jong, A., Molenaar, I.W., 1987, An application of Mokken s model for stochastic cumulative scaling in psychiatric research, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 21, [5] De Koning, E., Sijtsma, K., Hamers, J.H.M., 2001, Comparison of four IRT models when analyzing two tests for inductive reasoning, Manuscript submitted for publication. [6] Dzhafarov, E.N., Gluhovsky, 2005, Notes on selective influence, probabilistic causality, and probabilistic dimensionality, Manuscript submitted for publication.

3 [7] Edwards, A.L., 1957, Techniques of attitude scale construction, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. [8] Green, B.F., 1954, Attitude measurement, In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, volume I (pp ), Cambridge (Mass.): Addison-Wesley. [9] Guttman, L., 1944, A basis for scaling qualitative data, American Sociological Review, 9,

4 [10] Guttman, L., 1950, The basis for scalogram analysis, In S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld, S.A. Star, & J.A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp ), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [11] Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J., 1991, Fundamentals of item response theory, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. [12] Kelderman, H., Rijkes, C.P.M., 1994, Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items, Psychometrika, 59,

5 [13] Kingma, J., 1984, A comparison of four methods of scaling for the acquisition of early number concept, The Journal of General Psychology, 110, [14] Kingma, J., Loth, F.L., 1985, The validation of a developmental scale for seriation, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, [15] Kingma, J., Ten Vergert, E.M., 1985, A nonparametric scale analysis of the development of conservation, Applied Psychological Measurement, 9,

6 [16] Kraaikamp, H.J.M., 1992, Difficult roles. Psychometric research of the reliability and validity of the Groningen Social Restriction Scale for psychiatric patients, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. [17] Laros, J.A., Tellegen, P.J., 1991, Construction and validation of the SON-R 5 1/2 17, the Snijders-Oomen non-verbal intellegence test, Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

7 [18] Lazarsfeld, P.F., 1950, The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis, In S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld, S.A. Star, & J.A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction (pp ), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [19] Levine, M.V., 2003, Dimension in latent variable models, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, [20] Lewin, K., 1951, Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers, D. Cartwright (Ed.), New York: Harper & Row.

8 [21] Lewis, C., 1983, Bayesian inference for latent abilities, In S.B. Anderson & J.S. Helmick (Eds.), On educational testing (pp ), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [22] Matalon, B., 1965, L analyse hiérarchique, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, Mouton. [23] Mokken, R.J., 1971, A theory and procedure of scale analysis, The Hague, Mouton/Berlin: De Gruyter. [24] Mokken, R.J., Lewis, C., 1982, A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses, Applied Psychological Measurement, 6,

9 [25] Rasch, G., 1960, Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, (Studies in mathematical psychology I), Copenhagen: Nielsen & Lydiche (for Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut). [26] Reckase, M.D., 1997, A linear logistic multidimensional model for dichotomous item response data, In W.J. van der Linden, R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp ), New York: Springer. [27] Rivas Moya, T., 1999, Mokken scale analysis: An application to items of numerical inductive reasoning, Paper presented at the European Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Lueneburg, Germany.

10 [28] Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, I.W., 2002, Introduction to nonparametric item response theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [29] Sixtl, F., 1967, Messmethoden der Psychologie, Weinheim: Julius Beltz. [30] Torgerson, W.S., 1958, Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley. [31] Verweij, A.C., Sijtsma, K., Koops, W., 1996, A Mokken scale for transitive reasoning suited for longitudinal research, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19,

11 [32] Verweij, A.C., Sijtsma, K., Koops, W., 1999, An ordinal scale for transitive reasoning by means of a deductive strategy, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23,

Item Response Models, Pathological Science and the Shape of Error

Item Response Models, Pathological Science and the Shape of Error Reply to Borsboom and Mellenbergh Joel Michell University of Sydney Response Abstract. There is nothing in Borsboom and Mellenbergh s (2004)