CONTENT ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE BIAS: DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED MEASURE Heather M. Hartman-Hall David A. F. Haaga
|
|
- Susanna Sims
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Volume 17, Number 2, Summer 1999 CONTENT ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE BIAS: DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED MEASURE Heather M. Hartman-Hall David A. F. Haaga American University ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research was to develop a standardized content analytic measure of cognitive bias as conceptualized in Beck's (1987) cognitive theory of depression. In a pilot study it was determined that a written stimulus format was preferable to an audiotaped stimulus format with respect to comprehensibility. Valence and expectancy ratings collected in this pilot study also served as the basis for selection of items for the final measure, balancing positive and negative, expected and unexpected events. In study 2 open-ended written responses to questions about the main cause of each event, and the justifications for these attributions, were coded for indices of bias, defined (as in Cook & Peterson, 1986) as justifications that fail to cite covariation of the ascribed cause with the effect. Cognitive bias scores in Study 2 showed internal consistency (positive item-remainder correlations) and high interrater reliability. As predicted, justifications of attributions for expected events were more biased and less rational than were justifications of attributions for unexpected events. Cognitive theory of depression (Beck, 1987) proposes that depression is associated with negative thinking about the self, the world, and the future. This negative thinking is believed to be maintained in part by cognitive biases such as a tendency to overgeneralize the implications of specific negative events. Many studies have corroborated this prediction by finding elevated scores on cognitive bias measures among depressed people (Haaga, Dyck, & Ernst, 1991). These studies have measured cognitive bias via questionnaires (e.g., Smith, O'Keeffe, & Address correspondence to David A. F. Haaga, Department of Psychology, Asbury Building, American University, Washington, DC ; dhaaga@american.edu. 105 C 1999 Human Sciences Press, Inc.
2 106 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Christensen, 1994), sentence completions (Watkins & Rush, 1983), or articulated thoughts in simulated situations (White, Davison, Haaga, & White, 1992). Each of these measurement methods is useful but has potential limitations. Use of cognition questionnaires requiring endorsement of one or another investigator-provided response alternative runs the risk of providing prompts with which people will agree even if their own spontaneous thoughts differed in theoretically important ways from the a priori-defined choices (Davison, Vogel, & Coffman, 1997). Sentence completion and articulated thoughts measures avoid this potential problem by incorporating unstructured response formats. However, in standard uses of these procedures there is no opportunity to probe responses in order to find out more about the respondent's intended meaning (analogous to the inquiry phase of a Rorschach administration). The absence of such probes may sometimes set constraints on the interpretability of open-ended verbal responses with respect to cognitive variables (Haaga, 1989). A promising alternative method of evaluating cognitive bias was devised by Cook and Peterson (1986). Their method involved content analysis of interview transcripts. Depressed and nondepressed women were to describe negative events they had experienced in the past year, then to identify the major cause of the event. Respondents were queried further regarding the justification for these causal attributions, i.e., why they perceived the named cause to be the cause of the specific negative event under discussion. These justifications provided the critical material for independent coders' evaluations of cognitive bias. In particular, if the justification cited covariation evidence ("evidence that the attributed cause covaries with the event of concern"; Cook & Peterson, 1986, p. 294), this was taken to be a rational justification. Justifications failing to cite covariation data were coded as irrational, and these included the various types of cognitive bias (selective abstraction, overgeneralization, arbitrary inference, etc.) described by Beck. Although Cook and Peterson's method of content analyzing interviews for indices of cognitive bias has commendable features such as open-ended responding and follow-up probes, it has two noteworthy limitations. First, the exclusive focus on negative events limits content validity. Later research with the interview method suggested that this is an important limitation. In particular, diagnostic group differences in cognitive bias interacted with situational valence, such that depressed people were more biased in justifying their attributions for negative
3 Heather M. Hartman-Hall and David A. F. Haaga 107 events (replicating Cook & Peterson, 1986) but less biased in justifying attributions for positive events (McDermut, Haaga, & Bilek, 1997). Second, by focusing the assessment of cognition on recent actual events, the interview method maximizes realism but sacrifices standardization. That is, any associations between cognitive bias and individual-difference variables such as personality traits are ambiguous in that they could be ascribed to differences in cognitive processing (as intended) or to differences in the nature of events experienced by people scoring high vs. low on the pertinent personality measure. STUDY 1 Based upon these considerations, the research reported in this article was conducted to develop a standardized test of cognitive bias, based on the interview method used by Cook and Peterson (1986) and by McDermut et al. (1997) but with the same stimulus events for all respondents. Our first study was a pilot investigation used to determine the method of stimulus presentation (written or audiotaped) to be used in the cognitive bias test, as well as to select specific items. Content validity was taken into account in that we aimed to balance the test content with respect to valence (positive vs. negative) and predictability (expected vs. unexpected events). People are less likely to undergo extensive attributional search when an event is expected (Kanazawa, 1992), and therefore respondents may be less likely to be able to provide a rational justification for their attributions for expected events. Method Participants. Participants were 48 undergraduate psychology students, who earned partial course credit in return for participating in the study. The sample was predominantly Caucasian (90%), never-married (98%), female (69%), and young (mean age = 20.6 years). Materials, Two types of stimulus materials were evaluated. First, about one-half of the participants (re = 23) were presented with written descriptions of hypothetical events. Twenty events were tested, with each of two subgroups (n = 11 and n = 12, respectively) responding to a different, randomly selected, subset of ten events. The
4 108 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 20 events consisted of five of each of four types of events: positive expected, positive unexpected, negative expected and negative unexpected. Each event description consisted of several sentences describing both the situation that immediately preceded the event and the event itself. Many of the hypothetical events were based upon incidents described by participants in the McDermut et al. (1997) study. Participants were asked to imagine that they were actually experiencing the event described and to respond in writing to two questions: "What would you identify as the major cause of this event?" and "What makes you think that the cause listed above is the major cause of this event?" Participants were then asked to rate the nature of the event on a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 = very negative event, 7 = very positive event) as well as how expected the event would be (1 = totally unexpected event, 7 = totally expected event). Second, the other one-half of participants (n = 25) responded to audiotaped depictions of hypothetical events. Participants listened to recorded role-plays of the same events as were presented in written form in the other study condition. Again, two subgroups (n's = 12 and 13, respectively) each evaluated ten events. After each event was depicted on tape, the participant responded in writing to the same four questions (major cause, justification of causal attribution, valence rating, expectancy rating) listed earlier. Results and Discussion The format involving written stimuli proved more comprehensible to participants and was therefore selected for use in Study 2. Three participants in the audiotape condition expressed (in written comments at the end of the study) confusion as to how they were supposed to respond, whereas no one in the written-stimulus condition did so. Selection of which events to retain for the final written-stimulus measure to be evaluated in Study 2 was based upon valence and expectancy ratings. Twelve event descriptions 1 (three of each type) were selected for the final measure (see Table 1 for valence and expectancy data, based on the written-stimulus condition responses only). For an item to be included in the final measure, its average ratings on both valence and expectancy had to be on the correct side of the scale midpoint. For example, an event intended to be positive and unexpected would have to yield an average valence rating over 4.00 and an averl The complete event descriptions used in this measure can be obtained from the corresponding author.
5 Heather M. Hartman-Hall and David A. F. Haaga 109 Table 1 Average Valence and Expectedness Ratings of Hypothetical Events Selected for Final Measure Event Positive Expected: Getting a raise after good review Enjoying trip with friend Romantic partner wanting to commit Positive Unexpected: Winning money at casino Elected as club officer Recommended for honors course Negative Expected: Doing poorly in class Romantic partner ending distant relationship Negative Unexpected: Friend canceling plans Romantic partner ending close relationship Having problems with roommate a Not getting job offer mean Valence age expectancy rating under When more than three items of a given type met this standard, those with less variable valence and expectancy ratings were selected for the final measure. SD Expectedness mean SD Note. Valence ratings were made on a 1 (Very Negative) to 7 (Very Positive) scale. Expectedness ratings were based on a 1 (Totally unexpected) to 7 (Totally expected) scale. This item was rewritten and included in Study 2 as a negative expected event. STUDY 2 The 12-item written test developed in Study 1 was further evaluated along several lines in a new sample. First, we evaluated the interrater reliability of rationality coding of participants' justifications for their
6 110 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy causal attributions for the events. Second, we evaluated internal consistency of the four (crossing valence and expectancy) subscales by computing item-remainder correlations for rationality ratings on each item. Finally, we made a first step at evaluating construct validity by comparing mean rationality ratings as a function of situation valence and expectancy. Based upon research by Kanazawa (1992) showing less spontaneous attributional activity after expected events, we reasoned that a valid measure of the rationality of participants'justifications for causal attributions should reveal less rational justifications for attributions for expected events. Method Participants. Participants were 90 undergraduate students, who received partial course credit in psychology courses in return for participating in the study. As in Study 1, the sample was mostly young (mean age was 21.1 years), female (84%), Caucasian (77%), and never married (94%). Materials. The 12-item test developed in Study 1 was completed. Participants responded to three each of four types of events: positive expected, positive unexpected, negative expected, and negative unexpected. After each event description, participants were asked to respond to two written questions: "What would you identify as the major cause of this event?" and "What makes you think that the cause listed above is the major cause of this event?" Three independent raters who were masked as to the hypotheses of the study coded each justification on a scale from 1 (Clearly Irrational) to 5 (Clearly Rational). Judgements about rationality were made according to a modified version of the rating scheme developed by Mc- Dermut et al. (1997). This coding system was based on Kelley's (1973) definition of rational attributional processes. A rational justification was defined as one that cited covariation information. Also rated as rational were justifications in cases where covariation information was not available, but justifications were clearly rational (for example, justifications that cited a knowledgeable authority). As in Cook and Peterson (1986) and McDermut et al. (1997), justifications not meeting these standards were considered irrational. Irrational justifications included those providing no specific basis for the selected attribution (e.g., simply restating the attribution or claiming to "just know" that the hypothesized cause was the actual cause), as well as justifications
7 Heather M. Hartman-Hall and David A. F. Haaga 111 reflecting specific cognitive biases (selective abstraction, overgeneralization, arbitrary inference, etc.) described in cognitive theory of depression. Raters practiced making these judgements on the responses from the pilot data in Study 1 during the training phase. 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Interrater reliability of judgments of the rationality of justifications for attributions was high. Using Winer's (1971) intraclass correlation equation, as recommended in Bartko (1976), the reliability correlation was r 3 =.85. To test internal consistency of the rationality ratings, item-remainder correlations were computed for each item within each of the four event types (negative expected, negative unexpected, positive expected, and positive unexpected). All of these 12 item-remainder correlations were positive (r's > =.18), and 11 of the 12 were significant (see Table 2). To test the effects of expectancies and situation valence on rationality, a repeated measures 2x2 ANOVA (positive/negative events X expected/unexpected events) was conducted (average rationality ratings in each cell are listed in Table 3). A significant main effect for expectedness was found, such that rationality ratings were lower (more biased) in expected events, F (1, 89) = 5.43, p <.03. The main effect of situation valence was nonsignificant, F (1, 89) = 0.70, p >.4, as was the interaction of situation valence and expectedness, F (1, 89) = 3.49, p <.07. GENERAL DISCUSSION Content analysis methods involve inferring psychological states from participants' written or spoken words. Such methods have been used to study a wide range of personality-relevant variables (Smith, 1992) and may be especially well-suited to assessment of cognition inasmuch as language provides a major set of clues to individuals' conscious thoughts (Lee & Peterson, 1997). The purpose of this study was to develop an assessment device useful in future research on Beck's (1987) theory that depressed people make processing errors when interpreting events. As expected, ratio- 2 The coding manual can be obtained from the corresponding author.
8 112 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Table 2 Item-Remainder Correlations of Rationality Ratings for Events Positive Expected Getting a raise after good review Enjoying trip with friend Romantic partner wanting to commit Positive Unexpected Winning money at casino Elected as club officer Recommended for honors course Negative Expected Doing poorly in class Romantic partner ending distant relationship Having problems with roommate Negative Unexpected Friend canceling plans Romantic partner ending close relationship Not getting job offer.22*.33*.35*.23*.18.27*.21*.21*.25*.24*.31*.24* Note. *p <.05 nality ratings for justifications of causal attributions were higher for unexpected than for expected events. This is consistent with basic research on attributional processing and expectancies and tends to support the validity of the content analytic measure. Reliability evidence (internal consistency, interrater reliability) was also favorable. The method described in this article enjoys some of the advantages of content analysis methods in general, such as not forcing respondents to select from a few predetermined response options. By the same token, its topical focus, rationality vs. bias in attributional justifications, is relatively narrow by comparison to some more exploratory applications of content analysis. As such, this method is responsive to the suggestion by McAdams and Zeldow (1993) that researchers using content analysis "err on the side of depth over breadth" (p. 244). Future research could employ this measure in theoretically relevant individual-differences studies, such as linking rationality of justifications for causal attributions with current or past major depression.
9 Heather M. Hartman-Hall and David A. F. Haaga 113 Table 3 Average Rationality Ratings for Justifications of Attributions Type of Event Positive Expected Positive Unexpected Negative Expected Negative Unexpected Mean Note. N = 90. Each mean is the average across participants of a 3-item average of cognitive bias ratings (1 = clearly irrational/biased, 5 = clearly rational). SD REFERENCES Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1, Cook, M. L., & Peterson, C. (1986). Depressive irrationality. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S., & Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, Haaga, D. A. F. (1989). Articulated thoughts and endorsement procedures for cognitive assessment in the prediction of smoking relapse. Psychological Assessment, 1, Haaga, D. A. F., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychological Bullet in, 110, Kanazawa, S. (1992). Outcome or expectancy? Antecedent of spontaneous causal attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, Lee, F., & Peterson, C. (1997). Content analysis of archival data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, McAdams, D. P., & Zeldow, P. B. (1993). Construct validity and content analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, McDermut, J. F., Haaga, D. A. F., & Bilek, L. A. (1997). Cognitive bias and irrational beliefs in major depression and dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21,
10 114 Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Smith, C. P. (Ed.) (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Smith, T. W., O'Keeffe, J. L., & Christensen, A. J. (1994). Cognitive distortion and depression in chronic pain: Association with diagnosed disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, Watkins, J. T., & Rush, A. J. (1983). Cognitive response test. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, White, J., Davison, G. C., Haaga, D. A. F., & White, K. (1992). Cognitive bias in the articulated thoughts of depressed and nondepressed psychiatric patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
FUNCTIONAL CONSISTENCY IN THE FACE OF TOPOGRAPHICAL CHANGE IN ARTICULATED THOUGHTS Kennon Kashima
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Volume 7, Number 3, Fall 1989 FUNCTIONAL CONSISTENCY IN THE FACE OF TOPOGRAPHICAL CHANGE IN ARTICULATED THOUGHTS Kennon Kashima Goddard College
More informationCognitive-Behavioral Assessment of Depression: Clinical Validation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1983, Vol. 51, No. 5, 721-725 Copyright 1983 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. Cognitive-Behavioral Assessment of Depression: Clinical Validation
More informationGOLDSMITHS Research Online Article (refereed)
GOLDSMITHS Research Online Article (refereed) Davies, Martin F. Irrational beliefs and unconditional self-acceptance. II. Experimental evidence linking two key features of REBT Originally published in
More informationLooming Maladaptive Style as a Specific Moderator of Risk Factors for Anxiety
Looming Maladaptive Style as a Specific Moderator of Risk Factors for Anxiety Abby D. Adler Introduction Anxiety disorders are the most common mental illness in the United States with a lifetime prevalence
More informationThe Grateful Disposition: Links to Patterns of Attribution for Positive Events. Sharon L. Brion. Michael E. McCullough. Southern Methodist University
The Grateful Disposition: Links to Patterns of Attribution for Positive Events. Sharon L. Brion Michael E. McCullough Southern Methodist University Abstract In this study, we explored the relationship
More informationThe Science of Psychology. Chapter 1
The Science of Psychology Chapter 1 What Is Psychology? Scientific study of behavior and mental processes Critical Thinking Inductive Deductive Analytical Purposeful Open Authentic What is critical thinking?
More informationNeed for Cognition: Does It Influence Professional Judgment?
Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, Vol. 6, no. 1, pp.240-248, January 2017 240 Need for Cognition: Does It Influence Professional Judgment? Wimpie Yustino Setiawan Universitas Atma
More informationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin http://psp.sagepub.com/ Depression, School Performance, and the Veridicality of Perceived Grades and Causal Attributions Friedrich Försterling and Martin J. Binser
More informationLAY THEORIES CONCERNING CAUSES AND TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Volume 17, Number 4, Winter 1999 LAY THEORIES CONCERNING CAUSES AND TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION Lindsey Kirk Cindy Brody Ari Solomon David A. F. Haaga
More informationSurvey Methods in Relationship Research
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications Department of Psychological Sciences 1-1-2009 Survey Methods in Relationship Research Christopher Agnew Purdue
More informationAssessment: Interviews, Tests, Techniques. Clinical Psychology Lectures
Lecture 6 Assessment: Interviews, Tests, Techniques Clinical Psychology Lectures Psychodiagnostic Assessment Also termed: personality assessment, diagnostic assessment, pretreatment assessments or psychological
More informationCompetency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS)
Competency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS) Content Knowledge 1 Content Knowledge: Accuracy of scientific understanding Higher Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) 3 Analysis: Clarity of Research Question
More information10 Intraclass Correlations under the Mixed Factorial Design
CHAPTER 1 Intraclass Correlations under the Mixed Factorial Design OBJECTIVE This chapter aims at presenting methods for analyzing intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability studies based on a
More informationBiased Decision-Making Processes in Aggressive Boys Kenneth A. Dodge and Joseph P. Newman
Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1981, Vol. 90, No. 4, 375-379 Copyright 1981 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0021-843X/81 /9004-0375 J00.75 Biased Decision-Making Processes in Aggressive
More informationPLS 506 Mark T. Imperial, Ph.D. Lecture Notes: Reliability & Validity
PLS 506 Mark T. Imperial, Ph.D. Lecture Notes: Reliability & Validity Measurement & Variables - Initial step is to conceptualize and clarify the concepts embedded in a hypothesis or research question with
More informationChapter 6: Attribution Processes
Chapter 6: Attribution Processes 1. Which of the following is an example of an attributional process in social cognition? a. The act of planning the actions to take given a social situation b. The act
More informationISC- GRADE XI HUMANITIES ( ) PSYCHOLOGY. Chapter 2- Methods of Psychology
ISC- GRADE XI HUMANITIES (2018-19) PSYCHOLOGY Chapter 2- Methods of Psychology OUTLINE OF THE CHAPTER (i) Scientific Methods in Psychology -observation, case study, surveys, psychological tests, experimentation
More informationSexism Predicts Appeal of Gender Stereotypes from a Popular Book on Relationships
Sexism Predicts Appeal of Gender Stereotypes from a Popular Book on Relationships Jeanna E. Cooper and Margaret L. Signorella 1 The Pennsylvania State University College students and older adults had difficulty
More informationParticipants. 213 undergraduate students made up the total participants (including the reporter): gender. ethnicity. single/dating/married.
Rape Blame Rape Defined Interpretations of rape o being motivated by a need for power, control or dominance and sexual fulfillment on the part of the perpetrator (Muehlenhard and Linton, 1987) Date rape
More informationClosed Coding. Analyzing Qualitative Data VIS17. Melanie Tory
Closed Coding Analyzing Qualitative Data Tutorial @ VIS17 Melanie Tory A code in qualitative inquiry is most often a word or short phrase that symbolically assigns a summative, salient, essence capturing,
More informationThis self-archived version is provided for scholarly purposes only. The correct reference for this article is as follows:
SOCIAL AFFILIATION CUES PRIME HELP-SEEKING INTENTIONS 1 This self-archived version is provided for scholarly purposes only. The correct reference for this article is as follows: Rubin, M. (2011). Social
More informationPSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS A total of 7931 ratings of 482 third- and fourth-year medical students were gathered over twelve four-week periods. Ratings were made by multiple
More informationCritical Thinking Assessment at MCC. How are we doing?
Critical Thinking Assessment at MCC How are we doing? Prepared by Maura McCool, M.S. Office of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Metropolitan Community Colleges Fall 2003 1 General Education Assessment
More informationINTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 5. CLINICAL APPROACH TO INTERVIEWING PART 1
INTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 5. CLINICAL APPROACH TO INTERVIEWING PART 1 5.1 Clinical Interviews: Background Information The clinical interview is a technique pioneered by Jean Piaget, in 1975,
More informationChapter 11: Behaviorism: After the Founding
Chapter 11: Behaviorism: After the Founding Dr. Rick Grieve PSY 495 History and Systems Western Kentucky University 1 Operationism Operationism: : the doctrine that a physical concept can be defined in
More informationRelations between premise similarity and inductive strength
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12 (2), 340-344 Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength EVAN HEIT University of Warwick, Coventry, England and AIDAN FEENEY University of Durham,
More informationADMS Sampling Technique and Survey Studies
Principles of Measurement Measurement As a way of understanding, evaluating, and differentiating characteristics Provides a mechanism to achieve precision in this understanding, the extent or quality As
More informationQualitative and Quantitative Approaches Workshop. Comm 151i San Jose State U Dr. T.M. Coopman Okay for non-commercial use with attribution
Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Workshop Comm 151i San Jose State U Dr. T.M. Coopman Okay for non-commercial use with attribution This Workshop This is a research skill workshop. This workshop
More informationWhy Does Similarity Correlate With Inductive Strength?
Why Does Similarity Correlate With Inductive Strength? Uri Hasson (uhasson@princeton.edu) Psychology Department, Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Geoffrey P. Goodwin (ggoodwin@princeton.edu)
More informationRating the construct reliably
EALTA Summer School, Innsbruck, 2016 Rating the construct reliably Jayanti Banerjee and Claudia Harsch Session Outline What is the rating process? Why do we need rater training? Rater training research
More informationOptimal Flow Experience in Web Navigation
Optimal Flow Experience in Web Navigation Hsiang Chen, Rolf T. Wigand and Michael Nilan School of Information Studies, Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244 Email: [ hchen04, rwigand, mnilan]@mailbox.syr.edu
More informationFinal Exam: PSYC 300. Multiple Choice Items (1 point each)
Final Exam: PSYC 300 Multiple Choice Items (1 point each) 1. Which of the following is NOT one of the three fundamental features of science? a. empirical questions b. public knowledge c. mathematical equations
More informationMeasuring and Assessing Study Quality
Measuring and Assessing Study Quality Jeff Valentine, PhD Co-Chair, Campbell Collaboration Training Group & Associate Professor, College of Education and Human Development, University of Louisville Why
More informationSupplementary Material for Malle, Knobe, and Nelson (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question.
Supplementary Material for Malle, Knobe, and Nelson (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. Study A1 Bertram F. Malle and Sarah E. Nelson In this
More informationSEMINAR ON SERVICE MARKETING
SEMINAR ON SERVICE MARKETING Tracy Mary - Nancy LOGO John O. Summers Indiana University Guidelines for Conducting Research and Publishing in Marketing: From Conceptualization through the Review Process
More informationMBTI. Populations & Use. Theoretical Background 7/19/2012
MBTI Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Populations & Use General population use, most appropriate for ages 14+ 14 translations available 7 th grade or above reading level Measurement of normal personality differences
More informationThank you Dr. XXXX; I am going to be talking briefly about my EMA study of attention training in cigarette smokers.
Thank you Dr. XXXX; I am going to be talking briefly about my EMA study of attention training in cigarette smokers. 1 This work is a result of the combined efforts of myself and my research advisor, Dr.
More informationA Simulation of the Activation- Selection Model of Meaning. Gorfein, D.S. & Brown, V.R.
A Simulation of the Activation- Selection Model of Meaning Gorfein, D.S. & Brown, V.R. Abstract The activation-selection model of determining the meaning of an ambiguous word or phrase (Gorfein, 2001)
More informationIntroduction. 1.1 Facets of Measurement
1 Introduction This chapter introduces the basic idea of many-facet Rasch measurement. Three examples of assessment procedures taken from the field of language testing illustrate its context of application.
More informationSENTENCE COMPLETION TEST FOR DEPRESSION. LONG FORM Version 3.1 SCD-48
SENTENCE COMPLETION TEST FOR DEPRESSION LONG FORM Version 3.1 SCD-48 Dr Stephen Barton Division of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences University of Leeds, UK. (Copyright, 1999) SENTENCE COMPLETION TEST
More informationThe Feature of the Reaction Time for Performing Personality Self-rating 1) : Conditions by Personality Trait Terms and by Sentence
Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology 2016, Vol. 42 (Special edition), 8 15 Article The Feature of the Reaction Time for Performing Personality Self-rating 1) : Conditions by Personality Trait Terms and
More informationDEVELOPING THE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK Dr. Noly M. Mascariñas
DEVELOPING THE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK Dr. Noly M. Mascariñas Director, BU-CHED Zonal Research Center Bicol University Research and Development Center Legazpi City Research Proposal Preparation Seminar-Writeshop
More informationMichael Armey David M. Fresco. Jon Rottenberg. James J. Gross Ian H. Gotlib. Kent State University. Stanford University. University of South Florida
Further psychometric refinement of depressive rumination: Support for the Brooding and Pondering factor solution in a diverse community sample with clinician-assessed psychopathology Michael Armey David
More informationVERDIN MANUSCRIPT REVIEW HISTORY REVISION NOTES FROM AUTHORS (ROUND 2)
1 VERDIN MANUSCRIPT REVIEW HISTORY REVISION NOTES FROM AUTHORS (ROUND 2) Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to revise our paper. We have revised the manuscript according to the editors and
More informationSelf-Concept By Saul McLeod 2008
Name: Class: Self-Concept By Saul McLeod 2008 Because most people identify as separate from other people, they have what we call some "concept" of themselves. Self-concept refers to how people think about,
More informationEvaluation of Forensic Psychology Reports: The Opinion of Partners and Stakeholders on the Quality of Forensic Psychology Reports
Cronicon OPEN ACCESS EC PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY Research Article Evaluation of Forensic Psychology : The Opinion of Partners and Stakeholders on the Quality of Forensic Psychology Mohammed Aldhawyani*
More informationEmotional Valence and Reference Disturbance in Schizophrenia
Journal of Abnormal Psychology Copyright 00 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 00, Vol. 111, No. 1, 186 191 001-843X/0/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//001-843X.111.1.186 Emotional Valence and Reference
More informationA Coding System to Measure Elements of Shared Decision Making During Psychiatric Visits
Measuring Shared Decision Making -- 1 A Coding System to Measure Elements of Shared Decision Making During Psychiatric Visits Michelle P. Salyers, Ph.D. 1481 W. 10 th Street Indianapolis, IN 46202 mpsalyer@iupui.edu
More informationRunning Head: BETTER THAN THEM, BUT NOT HIM 1. Why I Think I m Better Than Them, but Not Him. Clayton R. Critcher 1 and David Dunning 2
Running Head: BETTER THAN THEM, BUT NOT HIM 1 Why I Think I m Better Than Them, but Not Him Clayton R. Critcher 1 and David Dunning 2 1 University of California, Berkeley 2 Cornell University Author Note
More information04/12/2014. Research Methods in Psychology. Chapter 6: Independent Groups Designs. What is your ideas? Testing
Research Methods in Psychology Chapter 6: Independent Groups Designs 1 Why Psychologists Conduct Experiments? What is your ideas? 2 Why Psychologists Conduct Experiments? Testing Hypotheses derived from
More informationResearch Methods in Human Computer Interaction by J. Lazar, J.H. Feng and H. Hochheiser (2010)
Research Methods in Human Computer Interaction by J. Lazar, J.H. Feng and H. Hochheiser (2010) Example test questions PLUS ANSWERS Module Intelligent Interaction Design, 2016-2017 Below are example questions
More informationProf Debbie Vigar-Ellis QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION
1 QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am not an expert I am sharing what I have learnt from others Especially Julie Tinson (Stirling) Leyland Pitt (SFU) I learnt in the preparation of this seminar!
More informationCSC2130: Empirical Research Methods for Software Engineering
CSC2130: Empirical Research Methods for Software Engineering Steve Easterbrook sme@cs.toronto.edu www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/csc2130/ 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial
More informationSTEP II Conceptualising a Research Design
STEP II Conceptualising a Research Design This operational step includes two chapters: Chapter 7: The research design Chapter 8: Selecting a study design CHAPTER 7 The Research Design In this chapter you
More informationWriting Reaction Papers Using the QuALMRI Framework
Writing Reaction Papers Using the QuALMRI Framework Modified from Organizing Scientific Thinking Using the QuALMRI Framework Written by Kevin Ochsner and modified by others. Based on a scheme devised by
More informationPearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world
Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk Pearson Education Limited 2014
More informationPosttraumatic Stress and Attributions in College Students after a Tornado. Introduction. Introduction. Sarah Scott & Lisa Beck
Posttraumatic Stress and Attributions in College Students after a Tornado Sarah Scott & Lisa Beck Department of Behavioral Sciences Faculty Mentor: Caleb W. Lack, Ph.D. Most adults will be exposed to a
More informationINTRODUCTION. Evidence standards for justifiable evidence claims, June 2016
EVIDENCE STANDARDS: A DIMENSIONS OF DIFFERENCE FRAMEWORK FOR APPRAISING JUSTIFIABLE EVIDENCE CLAIMS 1 David Gough, EPPI-Centre, SSRU, UCL Institute of Education, University College London INTRODUCTION
More informationResearch Designs and Methods DANILO V. ROGAYAN JR.
Research Designs and Methods DANILO V. ROGAYAN JR. Research Design Research design refers to the plan and structure of the investigation used to obtain evidence to answer research questions. It describes
More informationABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE JUDGMENTS IN RELATION TO STRENGTH OF BELIEF IN GOOD LUCK
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2014, 42(7), 1105-1116 Society for Personality Research http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.7.1105 ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE JUDGMENTS IN RELATION TO STRENGTH OF BELIEF IN
More informationModeling the Influence of Situational Variation on Theory of Mind Wilka Carvalho Mentors: Ralph Adolphs, Bob Spunt, and Damian Stanley
Modeling the Influence of Situational Variation on Theory of Mind Wilka Carvalho Mentors: Ralph Adolphs, Bob Spunt, and Damian Stanley Abstract Recent advances in neuroimaging techniques and decision-making
More informationChapter 11 Nonexperimental Quantitative Research Steps in Nonexperimental Research
Chapter 11 Nonexperimental Quantitative Research (Reminder: Don t forget to utilize the concept maps and study questions as you study this and the other chapters.) Nonexperimental research is needed because
More informationValidity and Reliability. PDF Created with deskpdf PDF Writer - Trial ::
Validity and Reliability PDF Created with deskpdf PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com Validity Is the translation from concept to operationalization accurately representing the underlying concept.
More informationPSYCHOLOGY : JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING
PSYCHOLOGY 4136-100: JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING http://psych.colorado.edu/~vanboven/teaching/psyc4136/psyc4136.html Monday, 1:00-3:30, Muenzinger D156B Instructor Assistant Dr. Leaf Van Boven Jordan
More informationBiostatistics 2 nd year Comprehensive Examination. Due: May 31 st, 2013 by 5pm. Instructions:
Biostatistics 2 nd year Comprehensive Examination Due: May 31 st, 2013 by 5pm. Instructions: 1. The exam is divided into two parts. There are 6 questions in section I and 2 questions in section II. 2.
More informationLocus of Control and Psychological Well-Being: Separating the Measurement of Internal and External Constructs -- A Pilot Study
Eastern Kentucky University Encompass EKU Libraries Research Award for Undergraduates 2014 Locus of Control and Psychological Well-Being: Separating the Measurement of Internal and External Constructs
More informationA Behavioral Attention Task for Investigating Rumination in Borderline Personality Disorder: Final Report
Kaleidoscope Volume 11 Article 68 July 2014 A Behavioral Attention Task for Investigating Rumination in Borderline Personality Disorder: Final Report Jacob Folsom Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kaleidoscope
More informationEncyclopedia of Psychological Assessment (pp ). Rocio Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.). London: Sage, 2002.
Encyclopedia of Psychological Assessment (pp. 116-120). Rocio Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.). London: Sage, 2002. AA TTRIBUTION STYLES INTRODUCTION Shortly after research on attribution theory blossomed,
More informationINTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 6. CLINICAL APPROACH TO INTERVIEWING PART 2
INTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 6. CLINICAL APPROACH TO INTERVIEWING PART 2 6.1. Harry Stack Sullivan s Impact Harry Stack Sullivan was a brilliant pioneer in the elaboration of the psychiatric
More informationBridging the Gap: Predictors of Willingness to Engage in an Intercultural Interaction
Bridging the Gap: Predictors of Willingness to Engage in an Intercultural Interaction Heather Dudley What influences people s willingness to interact with someone of a different cultural background from
More informationAsking & Answering Sociological Questions
Chapter 2 Asking & Answering Sociological Questions 1 Scientific Method (p. 36) Sociology is a science because it requires a systematic method of investigation The scientific method is organized around
More informationPSYCHOLOGY IAS MAINS: QUESTIONS TREND ANALYSIS
VISION IAS www.visionias.wordpress.com www.visionias.cfsites.org www.visioniasonline.com Under the Guidance of Ajay Kumar Singh ( B.Tech. IIT Roorkee, Director & Founder : Vision IAS ) PSYCHOLOGY IAS MAINS:
More informationSocial Research (Complete) Agha Zohaib Khan
Social Research (Complete) Agha Zohaib Khan What is Research? Research is the systematic process of collecting and analysing information (data) in order to increase our understanding of the phenomenon
More informationWho Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning
Book Review/Compte rendu 291 Who Is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning Keith E. Stanovich Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. Pp. xvi, 1-296. Hardcover: ISBN 0-8058-2472-3,
More informationThe influence of (in)congruence of communicator expertise and trustworthiness on acceptance of CCS technologies
The influence of (in)congruence of communicator expertise and trustworthiness on acceptance of CCS technologies Emma ter Mors 1,2, Mieneke Weenig 1, Naomi Ellemers 1, Dancker Daamen 1 1 Leiden University,
More informationAU TQF 2 Doctoral Degree. Course Description
Course Description 1. Foundation Courses CP 5000 General Psychology Non-credit Basic psychological concepts and to introduce students to the scientific study of behavior. Learning and Behavior, Altered
More informationCommunicative Competence Scale
Communicative Competence Scale Wiemann (1977) created the Communicative Competence Scale (CCS) to measure communicative competence, an ability "to choose among available communicative behaviors" to accomplish
More informationDoes the Use of Personality Inventory Cause Bias on Assessment Center Results Because of Social Desirability? Yasin Rofcanin Levent Sevinç
Does the Use of Personality Inventory Cause Bias on Assessment Center Results Because of Social Desirability? Yasin Rofcanin Levent Sevinç Introduction According to the guidelines, in an assessment center
More informationOverview of the Logic and Language of Psychology Research
CHAPTER W1 Overview of the Logic and Language of Psychology Research Chapter Outline The Traditionally Ideal Research Approach Equivalence of Participants in Experimental and Control Groups Equivalence
More informationMyers Psychology for AP, 2e
Myers Psychology for AP, 2e David G. Myers PowerPoint Presentation Slides by Kent Korek Germantown High School Worth Publishers, 2014 AP is a trademark registered and/or owned by the College Board, which
More informationHow Surveillance Begets Perceptions of Dishonesty: The Case of the Counterfactual Sinner
ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL COGNITION How Surveillance Begets Perceptions of Dishonesty: The Case of the Counterfactual Sinner Dale T. Miller Stanford University Penny S. Visser University of Chicago Brian D.
More informationIntervening variables of stress, hassles, and health
Japanese Psychological Research 1989, Vol.31, No.3, 143-148 Short Report Intervening variables of stress, hassles, and health KEIKO NAKANO Department of Psychology, Keio University, Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo
More informationGenital Stage. Puberty to death. ADOLESCENCE ADULTHOOD SEXUAL INSTINCTS AND SEXUAL CONFLICTS REAPPEAR. FIRST MANIFESTATION
Latency Stage 6- puberty Time between resolution of Oedipus complex and puberty Usually not possible for sexual urges to be directly expressed Sexual energies are channeled into school and friends Cooties
More informationPsychological testing
Psychological testing Lecture 11 Mikołaj Winiewski, PhD Marcin Zajenkowski, PhD Strategies for test development and test item considerations The procedures involved in item generation, item selection,
More informationPsychological Experience of Attitudinal Ambivalence as a Function of Manipulated Source of Conflict and Individual Difference in Self-Construal
Seoul Journal of Business Volume 11, Number 1 (June 2005) Psychological Experience of Attitudinal Ambivalence as a Function of Manipulated Source of Conflict and Individual Difference in Self-Construal
More informationSeveral studies have researched the effects of framing on opinion formation and decision
Attitudes 1 Framing Effects on Attitudes Toward Pedophiles By: Larissa Smage, Advisor--- Joan Riedle The effects of framing techniques on attitudes toward a pedophile were investigated. Framing involves
More informationBiology 321 Lab 1 Measuring behaviour Sept , 2011
1 Goals To introduce the act of observing To examine the types of information collected when observation is unplanned and unstructured To discuss the biases each researcher brings to an observational study
More informationOrganizing Scientific Thinking Using the QuALMRI Framework
Organizing Scientific Thinking Using the QuALMRI Framework Written by Kevin Ochsner and modified by others. Based on a scheme devised by Steve Kosslyn. This handout outlines a structured process for generating,
More informationEmotional Intelligence Assessment Technical Report
Emotional Intelligence Assessment Technical Report EQmentor, Inc. 866.EQM.475 www.eqmentor.com help@eqmentor.com February 9 Emotional Intelligence Assessment Technical Report Executive Summary The first
More informationWork Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries
Work Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries Donald Macnab Psychometrics Canada Copyright Psychometrics Canada 2011. All rights reserved. The Work Personality Index is a trademark of
More informationCareer Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach
Career Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach James P. Sampson, Jr., Robert C. Reardon, Gary W. Peterson, and Janet G. Lenz Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James
More informationImplicit Information in Directionality of Verbal Probability Expressions
Implicit Information in Directionality of Verbal Probability Expressions Hidehito Honda (hito@ky.hum.titech.ac.jp) Kimihiko Yamagishi (kimihiko@ky.hum.titech.ac.jp) Graduate School of Decision Science
More informationRUNNING HEAD: RAPID EVALUATION OF BIG FIVE 1
RUNNING HEAD: RAPID EVALUATION OF BIG FIVE 1 The Accuracy of Rapid Evaluation of Big Five Personality Traits Melissa Poole, Nick Bliznoff, and Jackie Martin Hanover College RAPID EVALUATION OF BIG FIVE
More informationThe Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations Paradigm: A Think-Aloud Approach to Cognitive Assessment
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE 29 The Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations Paradigm: A Think-Aloud Approach to Cognitive Assessment Gerald C. Davison, Sandra G. Navarre, and Ralph
More informationSmiley Faces: Scales Measurement for Children Assessment
Smiley Faces: Scales Measurement for Children Assessment Wan Ahmad Jaafar Wan Yahaya and Sobihatun Nur Abdul Salam Universiti Sains Malaysia and Universiti Utara Malaysia wajwy@usm.my, sobihatun@uum.edu.my
More informationCOACHING I 7. CORE COMPETENCIES
COACHING I 7. CORE COMPETENCIES 7.1. What are the Core Competencies? The following eleven core coaching competencies were developed to support greater understanding about the skills and approaches used
More informationThank you very much for your guidance on this revision. We look forward to hearing from you.
1 PAINTED BUNTING MANUSCRIPT REVIEW HISTORY REVISION NOTES FROM AUTHORS (ROUND 2) We would like to submit a revision of our manuscript. As you requested, we have run new studies that employ additional
More informationNecessity, possibility and belief: A study of syllogistic reasoning
THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54A (3), 935 958 Necessity, possibility and belief: A study of syllogistic reasoning Jonathan St. B.T. Evans, Simon J. Handley, and Catherine N.J.
More informationI n t r o d u c t i o n
Preventing Alcohol and Drug Misuse in Young People: Adaptation and Testing of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (SFP10-14) for use in the United Kingdom In 2006 Coombes et al produced a report
More informationA Component Analysis of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Depression
Page 1 of 16 Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology April 1996 Vol. 64, No. 2, 295-304 1996 by the American Psychological Association For personal use only--not for distribution. A Component Analysis
More information