1 INTERNSHIP DUE PROCESS GUIDELINES DEFINITION OF PROBLEM For purposes of this document Intern problem is defined broadly as an interference in professional functioning which is reflected in one or more of the following ways: 1) an inability and/or unwillingness to acquire and integrate professional standards into one's repertoire of professional behavior, 2) an inability to acquire professional skills in order to reach an acceptable level of competency, and/or 3) an inability to control personal stress, psychological dysfunctions, and/or excessive emotional reactions which interfere with professional functioning. While it is a professional judgment as to when an Intern's behavior becomes more serious (i.e., problematic) rather than just of concern, for purposes of this document a concern refers to a trainees' behaviors, attitudes, or characteristics which, while of concern and which may require remediation, are perceived to be not unexpected or excessive for professionals in training. Problems typically become identified as problems when they include one or more of the following characteristics: 1) the Intern does not acknowledge, understand, or address the problem when it is identified, 2) the problem is not merely a reflection of a skill deficit which can be rectified by academic or didactic training, 3) the quality of services delivered by the Intern is sufficiently negatively affected, 4) the problem is not restricted to one area of professional functioning, 5) a disproportionate amount of attention by training personnel is required, 6) the trainee's behavior does not change as a function of feedback, remediation efforts, and/or time, 7) the problematic behavior has potential for ethical or legal ramifications if not addressed, 8) the intern's behavior negatively impacts the public view of the agency, 9) the problematic behavior negatively impacts the Intern program
2 Natalis General Guidelines for Intern and Training Program Responsibilities The Psychology Predoctoral Internship is designed as a General Internship and is seen as a component of the doctoral training process in Clinical Psychology. Broadly, the Internship aims to provide the intern with the opportunity (in terms of setting, experience, and supervision) to begin assuming the professional role of a psychologist consistent with the scientist/practitioner model. This role entails the integration of previous training and a further development of the scientific, professional, and ethical bases involved in professional functioning. I. Training Program s Expectation of Interns The expectations of interns are divided into three areas: 1) knowledge of and conformity to relevant professional standards, 2) acquisition of appropriate professional skills, and 3) appropriate management of personal concerns and issues as they relate to professional functioning. Each of these areas is described below: A. Professional Standards Interns are expected to: 1. Be cognizant of and abide by the guidelines as stated in the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, Standards for Providers of Psychological Services, Specialty Guidelines, and any other relevant, professional documents or standards which address psychologists' ethical, personal and/or legal responsibilities. 2. Be cognizant of and abide by the laws and regulations governing the practice of psychology as included in appropriate legal documents. Such documents include but are not necessarily limited to the Minnesota Board of Psychology It is recognized by the training program that mere knowledge of and exposure to the above guidelines and standards are not sufficient. Interns need to demonstrate the ability to integrate relevant professional standards into their own repertoire of professional and personal behavior. Examples of such integration include a demonstrated awareness of ethical issues when they arise in work with clients, appropriate decision making in other ethical situations, and awareness of ethical considerations in their own and other's professional work.
3 B. Professional Competency By the time the internship is complete, Interns are expected to: 1. Demonstrate knowledge of psychopathology and of developmental, psychosocial and psychological problems. 2. Demonstrate knowledge of the special issues involved in working with a minority and/or disadvantaged population. 3. Demonstrate diagnostic skills and methods of diagnosis including psychological assessment, interview assessment, and consultation for complications in practice 4. Demonstrate knowledge and skills in treatment, including psychotherapy (various modalities), case management, family therapy, group psychotherapy, crisis intervention, and medical consultation with children, adolescents, and adults. The above competency expectations imply that Interns will be making adequate progress in the above areas (as assessed by periodic evaluations) and that Interns will achieve a level of competency by the completion of the internship which will enable them to successfully complete the internship and at least approaches the ability to function independently as a psychologist. C. Personal Functioning It is recognized by the training program that there is a relationship between level of personal functioning and effectiveness as a professional psychologist, most notably in one's role delivering direct services to clients. Physical, emotional and/or educational problems may interfere with the quality of an intern's professional work. Such problems include but are not limited to a) educational or academic deficiencies, b) psychological adjustment problems and/or inappropriate emotional responses, c) inappropriate management of personal stress, d) inadequate level of self-directed professional development, and e) inappropriate use of and/or response to supervision. When such problems significantly interfere with an Intern's professional functioning, such problems will be communicated in writing to the Intern. The training program, in conjunction with the Intern, will formulate strategies for ameliorating such problems and will implement such strategies and procedures. If such attempts do not restore the Intern to an acceptable level of professional functioning within a reasonable period of time, discontinuation in the program may result. The specific procedures
4 employed for the acknowledgment and amelioration of Intern deficiencies will be described later in this paper.
5 II General Responsibilities of the Intern Program A major focus of internship is to assist Interns in integrating their personal values, attitudes and functioning as individuals with their professional functioning. The training program is committed to providing the type of learning environment in which an Intern can meaningfully explore personal issues which relate to his/her professional functioning. In response to the above intern expectations, the training program assumes a number of general responsibilities. The responsibilities correspond to the three general expectation areas (Professional Standards, Professional Competency, Personal Functioning) and are described below: A. The Training Program 1. The training program will provide Interns with information regarding relevant professional standards and guidelines as well as providing appropriate forums to discuss the implementations of such standards. 2. The training program will provide Interns with information regarding relevant legal regulations which govern the practice of psychology as well as providing appropriate forums to discuss the implementations of such guidelines. 3. The training program will provide written evaluations of the Intern's progress with the timing and content of such evaluations designed to facilitate interns' change and growth as professionals. Evaluations will address the Interns' knowledge of and adherence to professional standards, their professional skill competency, and their personal functioning as it relates to the delivery of professional services. In accepting the above responsibilities, the internship program will maintain communications with the Intern's graduate department regarding the trainee's progress during the internship year. The training program will provide appropriate mechanisms by which inappropriate intern behavior effecting professional functioning is brought to the attention of the intern. The training program will also maintain grievance and due process guidelines, to address and remediate perceived problems as they relate to professional standards, professional competency and/or professional functioning. INTERN EVALUATION, REVIEW AND DUE PROCESS PROCEDURES I The Evaluation Process
6 Interns are evaluated and given feedback throughout the year by their individual supervision in both formal and informal settings. Additionally, at the end of each rotation, the entire faculty evaluates Interns' performance and makes recommendations for the next rotation as well as future needs the Intern may experience. The Evaluation Form is completed by clinical supervisors after each rotation and discussed with the Intern, the evaluation of their performance and makes those recommendations and suggestions which are relevant. Then copies of the evaluation are given to the Training Director. Thus, the TD receives information from all supervisors that include her /his own impressions and those of others who have had significant contact with the Intern. This process is viewed as an opportunity for the TD to provide integrative feedback regarding the collective experience of others who have had significant interactions with the Intern. Both parties discuss how the internship experience is progressing, and the Intern is provided with the opportunity to give his/her reactions and critiques of supervisors and other aspects of the training experience. It may be in the context of this meeting or whenever during the rotation that a problem is identified that the TD and the Intern may arrange for a modification of the Intern's training program to address his/her training needs and/or the needs of the training program. II Initial Procedures for Responding to Inadequate Performance by an Intern (i.e.: Intern Problem) If an Intern receives a rating of "adequate but needs improvement" from any of the evaluation sources, the following procedures will be initiated: A. The Intern's supervisor will meet with the TD to discuss the rating and determine what action needs to be taken to address the issues reflected by the rating. B. The Intern will be notified, in writing, that such a review is occurring and will have the opportunity to provide a statement related to his/her response to the rating. C. In discussing the inadequate rating and the Intern's response, (if available) the TD may adopt any one or more of the following methods or may take any other appropriate action. He/She may issue a: 1) "Acknowledge Notice" which formally acknowledges a) that the supervisor is concerned with performance, b) that the rating has been brought to the attention of the intern, c) that the supervisor will work with the intern to specify the steps necessary to rectify the problem or skill deficits addressed by the rating, and d) that the behaviors associated with the rating are not significant enough to warrant serious action. 2) "Probation" which defines a relationship such that their school faculty, through the supervisors and TD, actively and systematically monitor, for a specific length of time, the degree to which the Intern addresses, changes
7 and/or otherwise improves the behavior associated with the inadequate rating. The probation is a written statement to the Intern and includes: a) the actual behaviors associated with the inadequate rating, b) the specific recommendations for rectifying the problem,, c) the time frame for the probation during which the problem is expected to be ameliorated, and d) the procedures designed to ascertain whether the problem has been appropriately rectified, or 3) "Take no further action. D. The TD will then meet with the Intern to review the action taken. If "Probation," the Intern may choose to accept the conditions or may choose to challenge the action. The procedures for challenging the action are presented in section III of this document. E. If either the Acknowledgment Notice or the Probation Action occurs, the TD will inform the intern's sponsoring university, indicating the nature of the inadequate rating, the rationale for the action, and the action taken by the faculty. The Intern shall receive a copy of the letter to the sponsoring university. F. Once the Acknowledgment Notice or Probation is issued by the TD, it is expected that the status of the rating will be reviewed no later than the next formal evaluation period or, in the case of probation, no later than the time limits identified in the probation statement. If the rating has been rectified to the satisfaction of the faculty, the Intern, sponsoring university and other appropriate individuals will be informed and no further action will be taken. III Situations in which Grievance Procedures are Initiated There are three situations in which grievance procedures can be initiated: A. when the Intern challenges the action taken by the faculty (Intern Challenge), B. when the faculty is not satisfied with the Intern's action in response to the action (Continuation of the Inadequate Rating), or C. when a member of the faculty initiates action against an Intern (Intern Violation). Each of these situations, and the course of action accompanying them, is described below. A. Intern Challenge. If the Intern challenges the action taken by the faculty as
8 described in II above, s/he must, within 10 days of receipt of the decision, inform the TD, in writing, of such a challenge. 1) The TD will then convene a Review Panel consisting of one program supervisor selected by the TD and one program supervisor selected by the intern. The Intern retains the right to hear all facts with the opportunity to dispute or explain his or her behavior. 2) A review hearing will be conducted, chaired by the TD, in which the challenge is heard and the evidence presented. Within 15 days of the completion of the review hearing, the Review Panel submits a written report to the Chief Psychologist/or outside consultant if the Chief Psychologist also serves as TD, including any recommendations for further action. Decisions made by the Review Panel will be made by majority vote. The Intern is informed of the recommendations. 3) Within 5 days of receipt of the recommendations, the Chief Psychologist will either accept the Review Panel's action, reject the Review Panel's action and provide an alternative, or refer the matter back to the Review Panel for further deliberation. The Panel then reports back to the Chief Psychologist within 10 days of the receipt of the Chief Psychologist's request for further deliberation. The Chief Psychologist then makes a decision regarding what action is to be taken and that decision is final.. 4) Once a decision has been made, the Intern, sponsoring university and other appropriate individuals are informed in writing of the action taken. B. Continuation of Inadequate Rating. If the faculty determines that there has not been sufficient improvement in the intern's behavior to remove the inadequate rating under the conditions stipulated in the probation, then a formal Review Panel will be convened. 1) The TD will communicate, in writing, to the Intern that the conditions for revoking the probation have not been met. The faculty may then adopt any one of the following methods or take any other appropriate action. It may issue a: a) continuation of the probation for a specific time period, b) suspension whereby the Intern is not allowed to continue engaging in certain professional activities until there is evidence that the behavior in question has improved, c) communication which informs the Intern the TD is recommending to the Chief Psychologist that the Intern will not if the behavior does not change, successfully complete the internship, and/or
9 d) communication which informs the Intern that the TD is recommending to the Chief Psychologist that the Intern be terminated immediately from the internship program. 2) Within 5 working days of receipt of this determination, the Intern may respond to the action by a) accepting the action or b) challenging the action. 3) If a challenge is made, the Intern must provide the TD, within 10 days, with information as to why the Intern believes the action is unwarranted. A lack of reasons by the Intern will be interpreted as complying with the sanction. 4) if the Intern challenges the action, a Review Panel will be formed consisting of the TD, two staff members selected by the TD, and two staff members selected by the Intern. 5) A Review Panel hearing will be conducted" chaired by the TD, in which the challenge is heard and the evidence presented. Within 10 days of the completion of the review hearing, the Review Panel shall communicate its recommendation to the Intern and to the Chief Psychologist. Decisions by the Review Panel will be made by majority vote. 6) Within 5 days of receipt of the recommendations, the Chief Psychologist will either accept the Review Panel's action, reject the Review Panel's action and provide alternative action, or refer the matter back to the Review Panel for further deliberation. The Panel then reports back to the Chief Psychologist within 10 days of the receipt of the Chief Psychologist's request for further deliberation. The Chief Psychologist then makes a decision regarding what action is to be taken and that decision is final. 7) Once a decision has been made, the Intern, sponsoring university and other appropriate individuals are informed in writing of the action taken. C. Intern Violation. Any faculty member may file, in writing, a grievance against an Intern for any of the following reasons: a) unethical or legal violation of professional standards or laws, b) professional incompetence, or c) infringement on the rights, privileges or responsibilities of others. 1) The TD will review the grievance with 2 members program supervisors and determine if there is reason to proceed and/or if the behavior in question is in the process of being rectified. 2) If the TD and other two members determine that the alleged behavior in the complaint, if proven, would not constitute a serious violation the TD shall inform the faculty member who may be allowed to renew the complaint if additional information is provided.
10 3) When a decision has been made by the TD and the other two faculty members that there is probable cause for deliberation by the Review Panel, the TD shall notify the faculty member and request permission to inform the Intern. The faculty member shall have five days to respond to the request and shall be informed that failure to grant permission may preclude further action. If no response is received within 5 days or permission to inform the Intern is denied, the TD and the two members shall decide whether to proceed with the matter. 4) If the Intern is informed, a Review Panel is convened consisting of the TD, two members selected by the faculty member, and two members selected by the Intern. The Review Panel receives any relevant information from both the Intern or faculty member as it bears on its deliberations. 5) A review hearing will be conducted, chaired by the TD in which the complaint is heard and the evidence presented. Within 10 days of the completion of the review hearing, the Review Panel shall communicate its recommendation to the Intern and to the Chief Psychologist. Decisions by the Review Panel shall be made by majority vote. 6) Within 5 days of receipt of the recommendation, the Chief Psychologist will either accept the Review Panel's action, reject the Review Panel's recommendation and provide alternative action, or refer the matter back to the Review Panel for further deliberation. The Panel then reports back to the Chief Psychologist within 10 days of the receipt of the Chief Psychologist's request for further deliberation. The Chief Psychologist then makes a decision regarding what action is to be taken and that decision is final. 7) Once a decision has been made the Intern, faculty member sponsoring university, and other appropriate individuals are informed in writing of the action taken. IV Situations where Interns raise a formal complaint or grievance about a supervisor, staff member, trainee, or program. There may be situations in which the Intern has a complaint or grievance against a supervisor, staff member, other trainee, or the program itself and wishes to file a formal grievance. The Intern should:
11 A) Raise the issue with the supervisor, staff member, other trainee, or Training Director in an effort to resolve the problem. B) If the matter cannot be resolved, or it is inappropriate to raise with the other individual, the issue should be raised with the Training Director. If the Training Director is the object of the grievance, or unavailable, the issue should be raised with the Chief Psychologist/ or outside consultantmediator. C) If the Training Director cannot resolve the matter, the Training Director will choose an agreeable faculty member acceptable to the Intern who will attempt to mediate the matter. Written material will be sought from both parties. D) If mediation fails, the Training Director will convene a review panel (except for complaints against staff members where the grievance procedures for that person's discipline will be followed) consisting of the Training Director, the Chief Psychologist and two supervisors of the Interns choosing. The Review Panel will review all written materials (from the Intern, other party, mediation) and have an opportunity at its discretion to interview the parties or other individuals with relevant information. The Review Panel has final discretion regarding outcome. E) Nothing here precludes attempted resolution of difficulties by adjudication at a school or university level. These guidelines are intended to provide the psychology Intern with a means to resolve perceived conflicts that cannot be resolved by informal means. Interns who pursue grievances in good faith will not experience any adverse personal or professional consequences.
12 REMEDIATION CONSIDERATIONS It is important to have meaningful ways to address problem once it has been identified. Several possible, and perhaps concurrent courses of action designed to remediate problems include but are not limited to: 1) increasing supervision, either with the same or other supervisors, 2) changing in the format, emphasis, and/or focus of supervision, 3) recommending and/or requiring personal therapy in a way that all parties involved have clarified the manner in which therapy contacts will be used in the Intern evaluation process. 4) reducing the Intern's clinical or other workload and/or requiring specific academic coursework, and/or 5) recommending, when appropriate, a leave of absence and/or a second Internship. When a combination of the above interventions does not, after a reasonable time period, rectify the problem, or when the trainee seems unable or unwilling to alter his/her behavior, the training program may need to take more formal action, including such actions as: 1) giving the Intern a limited endorsement, including the specification of those settings in which he/she could function adequately, 2) communicating to the Intern and academic department/program that the Intern has not successfully completed the internship, with the possibility of continuing the year as a practicum placement. 3) recommending and assisting in implementing a career shift for the Intern, and/or 4) terminating the Intern from the training program. All the above steps need to be appropriately documented and implemented in ways that are consistent with due process procedures.
13 DUE PROCESS: GENERAL GUIDELINES Due process ensures that decisions made by programs about Interns are not arbitrary or personally based, requires that programs identify specific evaluative procedures which are applied to all trainees, and have appropriate appeal procedures available to the intern so he/she may challenge the program's action. General due process guidelines include: 1) presenting Interns' in writing, with the program's expectations related to professional functioning, 2) stipulating the procedures for evaluation, including when and how evaluations will be conducted. Such evaluations should occur at meaningful intervals, 3) articulating the various procedures and actions involved in making decisions regarding problem, 4) communication, early and often, with graduate programs about any suspected difficulties with Interns, seeking input from these academic programs about how to address such difficulties, 5) instituting, with the input and knowledge of the graduate program, a remediation plan for identified inadequacies, including a time frame for expected remediation and consequences of not rectifying the inadequacies, 6) providing a written procedure to the Intern which describes how the Intern may appeal the program's action, 7) ensuring that Interns have sufficient time to respond to any action taken by the program, 8) using input from multiple professional sources when making decisions or recommendations regarding the Intern's performance, and 9) documenting, in writing and to all relevant parties, the action taken by the program and its rationale.
Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process Regions should seek to resolve all disputes involving people in an amicable fashion. Compromise is preferable to more severe forms of resolution. Almost
IRB policy and procedures 1 Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College IRB policy and procedures 2 Table of Contents A. Purpose and objectives... p. 3 B. Membership of the
POLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY I. POLICY STATEMENT: Charleston Southern University ("the University") is committed to maintaining a Christian environment for work,
Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines We are grateful to the Ontario Psychological Association and to the College of Alberta Psychologists for making their
Candidate and Facilitator Standards Policy Practicing Within the Scope of Existing Licensing, Training and/or Certification: The Daring Way is a curriculum that should be used in conjunction with existing
Counseling Psychology, Ph.D. 1 Counseling Psychology, Ph.D. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (http://education.temple.edu) About the Program This program is not accepting applications for the 2017-2018 academic year.
YALE CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY: MISSION STATEMENT, PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND REQUIREMENTS The Clinical Psychology Program at Yale University aspires to educate the next generation of leading academic and research
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE I. DEFINITIONS (A) Complainant: Any Tenant (as defined below) whose grievance is presented to the 504 Coordinator
DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES Physical Therapy Licensure COLORADO PHYSICAL THERAPY LICENSURE RULES AND REGULATIONS 4 CCR 732-1 [Editor s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.]
METROLINX ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS RULES OF PRACTICE Overview The Metrolinx Act, 2006, gives Metrolinx ( Metrolinx ) the authority to establish a system of administrative fees to ensure
ACPE Standards Revised 2016 Changes from ACPE Standards 2010 By The Standards Committee October 2015 The 2016 Standards and Manuals are published on the ACPE website and will be effective January 1, 2016.
AMERICAN BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AMERICAN BOARD OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY BOARD CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SUBSPECIALTY OF PEDIATRIC CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY CANDIDATE MANUAL
World Para Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations March 2017 Official Partners of World Para Athletics www.worldparaathletics.org @ParaAthletics ParalympicSport.TV /ParaAthletics Organisation Part
Professional and Personal Performance Standards Counseling Program College of Education Seattle University Student: ID#: Program Track: School Counseling Community Counseling Review: Purpose In addition
World Para Swimming Classification Rules and Regulations January 2018 2018 International Paralympic Committee ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Official Approved Supplier of World Para Swimming Equipment www.worldparaswimming.org
International Standard for Athlete Evaluation July 2015 International Paralympic Committee Adenauerallee 212-214 Tel. +49 228 2097-200 www.paralympic.org 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax +49 228 2097-209 firstname.lastname@example.org
California Association of School Psychologists Code of Ethics Adopted June 2002 Wendy Sharp Ethics Specialist CASP'S PRINCIPLES FOR PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Definition A Code of Ethics is a professional technique
Para-Taekwondo and Deaf-Taekwondo Classification Rules & Regulations Para-Taekwondo and Deaf-Taekwond0 Classification Rules and Regulations March 2014 Purpose and Organization of these Rules Purpose These
Judicial & Ethics Policy Copyright (c) 2017. National Board for Respiratory Care, Inc. All Rights Reserved. (The designations NBRC, CRT, RRT, CPFT and RPFT are federally registered service marks of the
PSYCHOLOGY (413) 662-5453 Chairperson: Sharon Claffey, Ph.D. Email: S.Claffey@mcla.edu PROGRAMS AVAILABLE BACHELOR OF ARTS IN PSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS MINOR PSYCHOLOGY MINOR TEACHER LICENSURE PSYCHOLOGY
Application for BSW Practice and Field Courses The School of Social Work at Bridgewater State University Name (printed) Banner ID# Date Form Completed By Student: Date Received by School of Social Work:
Termination: Ending the Therapeutic Relationship-Avoiding Abandonment By Elizabeth M. Felton, JD, LICSW, Associate Counsel and Carolyn I. Polowy, JD, General Counsel March 2015. National Association of
D.29/817 REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF DENTAL SURGERY IN ENDODONTICS [MDS(Endo)] These regulations apply to candidates admitted in 2017-2018 and thereafter (See also General Regulations and Regulations
Scope of Practice for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Professional Copyright 1993-2000 Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, Dallas, Texas USA: All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Organizations which endorse
Psychology Professor Joe W. Hatcher (on leave spring 2017; Associate Professor Kristine A. Kovack-Lesh (Chair); Visiting Professors Jennifer A. Johnson, Gary Young Departmental Mission Statement: The Department
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Approved: by Governing Body Date of next Review: Application: This policy applies to all concerns and complaints other than those relating to the following: Child Protection
DE-DESIGNATION OF YELLOW FEVER VACCINATION CENTRES January 2014 INDEX Page 1. Introduction 3 2. De-designating a YFVC 4 3. The de-designation process 5-6 4. Repeated breaches of the standards for designation
Appendix 9 POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH INTRODUCTION It is the policy of Western Washington
College Rules and Regulations 2.2008.1 Substance Abuse Policy Substance Abuse Policy for Employees and Students I. Substance Abuse Policy for Employees and Students A. Purpose The County College of Morris
Disclaimer: On-line versions of these regulations are the most current versions available; however, these are not official publication. For official publication of these and all State of Colorado regulations,
Information for parents about Ofsted s role in regulating childcare This section provides information about how Ofsted regulates childcare providers. It sets out how you might like to use the information
CANONS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT I. PREAMBLE C1.1 Introduction The practice of diabetes self-management education ( Profession ) is a recognized allied health profession. The Certified Diabetes Educator ( CDE
SUBJECT: Drug Free Environment NUMBER: 4:27 SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual Drug Free Workplace Policy The South Dakota Board of Regents is committed to providing a drug free workplace. Additional
Notice of Procedural Safeguards 2014 October Rights of Parents of Children with Disabilities The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), as amended in 2004, requires schools to provide parents
Attachment 5 CITY MANAGER S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CONDUCTED UNDER CHAPTER ONE OF THE SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL CODE July 19, 2010 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to establish
Grievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Grievance Procedure ( Procedure ) is to implement a system by which the Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County
Code of Practice on Authorship Introduction All DCU researchers, including research students, should disseminate their research in a timely fashion, and through as effective a means as possible. We have
Practicum and Internship Packet 2017-2018 Counseling Psychology Master of Arts Clinical Mental Health Counseling (CMHC) TABLE OF CONTENTS PRACTICUM Introduction to Practicum 4 Initiating Practicum. 6 Agreement
DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY I. Policy Section: 6.0 Human Resources II. Policy Subsection: 6.24 Drug and Alcohol Policy III. Policy Statement Grand Rapids Community College is committed to the elimination of
OUTPATIENT SERVICES PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CONTRACT (This is a detailed document. Please feel free to read at your leisure and discuss with Dr. Gard in subsequent sessions. It is a document to review over
IPC POWERLIFTING International Paralympic Committee Powerlifting Classification Rules and Regulations March 2015 IPC Powerlifting Classification Rules and Regulations, version 3 March 2015 International
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY CODE OF ETHICS (Approved March 2016) I. PREAMBLE (1) Criminology is a scientific discipline and criminologists subscribe to the general tenets of science and scholarship.
State of Florida Sexual Harassment Awareness Training Objectives To prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. To define the behavior that may constitute sexual harassment. To provide guidance to state
RESOLUTION AGREEMENT Paul Public Charter School OCR Case No. 11 12 1444 Paul PCS (the School) agrees to fully implement this (Agreement) to resolve OCR Complaint No. 11 12 1444. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This
Training Goals and Associated Objectives, Knowledge and Competencies Goal #1: To train students who are thoroughly grounded in the science of psychology and its application to health and disease. Associated
BP 4020 DRUG AND ALCOHOL-FREE WORKPLACE The Governing Board believes that the maintenance of drug and alcohol-free workplaces is essential to school and district operations. No employee shall unlawfully
Informed Consent for MINDFULNESS BASED Cognitive Therapy The state expects that you will be informed of all possible contingencies that might arise in the course of short - and long-term therapy. Please
APA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE (Effective October 10, 2017) 1 Statement of Purpose: To promote the highest degree of decision accuracy in credibility assessment, the APA establishes for its membership the following
New York Lawyers For The Public Interest, Inc. 151 West 30 th Street, 11 th Floor New York, NY 10001-4017 Tel 212-244-4664 Fax 212-244-4570 TTD 212-244-3692 www.nylpi.org Special Education Fact Sheet Special
Application for BSW Internship and Practice Courses The School of Social Work at Bridgewater State University Name (printed) Banner ID# (To be completed by Social Work Staff) Date Received by School of
Sport and Exercise Science Undergraduate Practicum Application Packet Instructions Please read the ENTIRE instructions and information sheets carefully for complete directions and information before completing
. MUSIC AND IMAGERY ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA INC. Code of Ethics Standards of Practice, and By-laws Preamble The Music and Imagery Association of Australia (MIAA) is the premier organisation representing
University of Rhode Island Counseling Center 217 Eleanor Roosevelt Hall Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 TEL: 401-874-2288 FAX: 401-874-5010 Clinical Graduate Application Process: Note. This application is
NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE of TECHNNOLOGY DENTAL HYGIENE DEPARTMENT Course Outline and Student Document Course Code & Title: DEN 2700 Dental Hygiene Internship in Community/Hospital Settings Term: Spring 2017
1. Preamble Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry (ASAR) ASAR s objective is to promote high standards of medical sonography in Australia which includes setting uniform, minimum standards of Sonographer
Oregon Department of Education Office of Learning/Student Services 255 Capitol Street NE Dispute Resolution Section Salem, OR 97310-0203 (503) 947-5689 Due Process Hearing Request Information Sheet and
Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Table of Contents Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students...
M.A. COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Common Core Curricular Courses CMHC 500 Orientation to Counselor Professional identity and Function (3 hours): This course introduces students to concepts regarding the professional
NU s School Psychology Practicum 1 SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM PRACTICUM MANUAL PRACTICUM REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION SYSTEM Program Director: Amy Briesch, PhD, NCSP 2017-2018 NU s School Psychology Practicum
Counseling Skills Evaluation Form: MS Version University of Wyoming, Department of Professional Studies, Counseling Program Student: Triad Spvsr: Instructor: Block Spvsr: Course / Semester: Pre-Practicum
202 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING. (3) Theories and concepts of human development, learning, and motivation are presented and applied to interpreting and explaining human behavior and interaction in relation
CHAPTER 121 AN ACT concerning the practice of physical therapy, amending P.L.2003, c.18, and amending and supplementing P.L.1983, c.296. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD In re: Matthew Ray Steiner, M.D. Respondent. CONSENT ORDER This matter is before the North Carolina Medical Board ("Board" on information regarding Matthew Ray Steiner,
Policy Name: Classified Employees Drug Testing Policy Code: 8.04 Date Adopted: R/A 5/21/12 The safety and security of the Wynne School District employees and students will be maintained as a high priority.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT POLICY Student Policies and Procedures Curry College Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct Policies and Procedures reflect the College s commitment to our students
School Psychology Doctoral Program Student Handbook Entering Class Fall 2012 Teamwork August 23, 2012 Welcome to the Psychology Department and School Psychology Doctoral Program at Central Michigan University.
State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures Chapter: Subject: Prisoner Rights Sexual Abuse / Sexual Assault and Reporting Index #: 808.19 Page 1 of 6 Effective: 6/12/2014 Reviewed:
Auditing Standards and Practices Council Philippine Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION PHILIPPINE STANDARD
ITU Paratriathlon Athlete Classification Rules (Appendix G of the ITU Competition Rules) Approved by the ITU Executive Board, in December 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Part One: General
Psychology 1 PSYCHOLOGY The Psychology Major Psychology is the scientific study of human and animal behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it. The objective of USD s psychological
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY Policy 9.1.9: HIV/AIDS Policy CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY POLICY and PROCEDURE Subject: Department: Human Resources Policy on HIV/AIDS Review/Revise Date: 2/11/10 5/4/10 Effective
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 Discrimination-Free Educational Environment The U.S. Department of Education, its Office for Civil Rights and Carroll College believe that providing all students
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Policies and Definitions promotes and supports human research. Basic tenets of human research are voluntary participation and the ethical treatment of the subjects in the research
Drug Free Workplace and Employee Drug and Alcohol Testing Contents Definitions... 2 General Provisions... 3 Legal Drugs... 3 Responsibilities of Albuquerque Public Schools Employees... 3 Testing for Drugs
IN THE MATTER OF THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT, R.S.A. 2000, c.h-7; AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING INTO THE CONDUCT OF ACSW Member, A MEMBER OF THE ALBERTA COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS; AND INTO THE MATTER OF
The Atlantic Canada Association of Reflexology Therapists Introduction to Standards for Reflexology Therapy Practice The Atlantic Canada Association of Reflexology Therapists (ACART) has developed these
POLICY FOR A DRUG AND ALCOHOL-FREE WORKPLACE I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Crossroads of Western Iowa recognizes the problems of substance abuse in society and in the workplace. Substance abuse poses a serious
Dual and Multiple Relationships in Perspective Managing Boundaries and Multiple Relationships Chapter 7 Psychology 475 Professional Ethics in Addictions Counseling Listen to the audio lecture while viewing
Chapter 1 To Be A Counselor: Making a Commitment Striving for Excellence Adopting a Neutral Posture Subjugating Personal Needs Coping with Discomfort Defining (broadly defined) Advise giving Encouragement
Vermont Recovery Network 200 Olcott Drive White River Junction, VT 05001 email@example.com www.vtrecoverynetwork.org 802-738-8998 The Vermont Recovery Network currently consists of 12 recovery
Name: School Year: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Component 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using assessment tools for systems, groups, and individuals to evaluate educational problems (enhancing
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA BACKGROUND In 2004, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Drug Treatment Court Act, Va. Code 18.2-254.1,