Ethics in Research. The above website lists several topics. Below, only selected highlights are quoted: - Conflict of Interest
|
|
- Winifred Green
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ethics in Research Compiled in 2010 by M.A. Van Hove (text in italics) with quotations from the American Physical Society ( underlined for emphasis. The ethical guidelines discussed below are of the greatest importance to scientists and engineers in general, not just physicists. Practicing researchers and teachers must apply them daily in their work. Students must familiarize themselves with these guidelines to become responsible professionals: they must apply them in their studies, theses and publications. Do you know what self-plagiarism is? Can you copy from Wikipedia without citation? Who should be included in a paper as co-authors vs. acknowledged? Are you responsible for all the statements in a paper? Can you replace raw data by fitted curves? Find out below! The consequences of unethical behavior can range up to loss of employment, loss of degree (e.g. PhD) or loss of reputation (Dr. Schön mentioned below suffered all three of these). Worse is possible when mishandling of money is involved: these cases can go to criminal courts. Nonfinancial cases are generally covered not by laws but by professional guidelines (e.g. the APS guidelines quoted below) and by institutional regulations; such cases are normally handled by the employer (universities, research institutions, etc., as in the case of Dr. Schön). The reality is that ethical behavior in some instances is compromised by pressures to publish and discover, as well as by the prospect of financial gain from commercialization of certain research discoveries. The problem is complicated because researchers may be confronted with choices in which the ethical route is not obvious. It is useful to draw the analogy between ethics education and safety training. Undoubtedly most physicists have an inherent desire to be safe, but the extent to which safety procedures are practiced in the lab depends on a range of factors, including prior experience and an understanding of what appropriate procedures are and what harm may come from failing to follow them. Formal safety training is often useful to fill in the gaps not filled by prior experience. Likewise ethics education can play the role of providing information not available from prior experience. This role is especially important for those just beginning in the field. The above website lists several topics. Below, only selected highlights are quoted: - Conflict of Interest Often in the research environment we are faced with situations in which we could stand to benefit personally. These situations can include for example, the use of University resources, telephone numbers, or web addresses to support or represent an outside activity, including businesses, hobbies and political activities. These situations constitute a conflict of interest. There are many professional activities of physicists that have the potential for a conflict of interest. Any professional relationship or action that may result in a conflict of interest must 1
2 be fully disclosed. When objectivity and effectiveness cannot be maintained, the activity should be avoided or discontinued. - Data Acquisition The results of research should be recorded and maintained in a form that allows analysis and review. Research data should be immediately available to scientific collaborators. Following publication, the data should be retained for a reasonable period in order to be available promptly and completely to responsible scientists. Exceptions may be appropriate in certain circumstances in order to preserve privacy, to assure patent protection, or for similar reasons. - Educational Concerns For students, it may be helpful to learn and discuss ethical standards before encountering them firsthand. - Health and Safety In the past, researchers and their supervisors have demonstrated a cavalier attitude towards these issues, which is inconsistent with current legal and ethical standards. It is essential that all researchers have training that prepares them for the hazards, and possible emergencies that they may encounter in the course of their work, and that all laws and regulations relating to safety are adhered to, and best practices be employed when there are hazards. This means that there should be compliance with all accepted safety standards. Researchers also have an obligation to carry out their work in a manner that does not threaten the health and safety of others, and to be forthcoming in identifying new risks and to be rapid in their response to hazardous conditions and emergencies that may arise. Health and safety standards are usually rigorously followed in large laboratory settings. It is important to recognize that they must be followed even in the most modest of research settings. - Human Subjects Research While it is not frequent, occasionally physicists perform research involving human subjects. Examples of such research include: educational studies, biophysics investigations, and surveys. See also Ethical and Professional Guidelines of the American Chemical Society at: - Issues of Bias Webster's New World Dictionary defines bias as a mental leaning or inclination; partiality; prejudice; bent. While it is probably impossible to eliminate bias, each person can strive to be aware of his or her preferences and alert to situations where the bias can be damaging to the science or ones colleagues. Also, one can become a careful observer of others and take 2
3 action to counteract the unfair or inappropriate consequences of biases, especially those that work to exclude or diminish people from different backgrounds than the majority. - Mentoring Group leaders, from department chairs to research directors, have an ethical obligation to create an environment that supports fair treatment and professional development opportunities for all group members. - Publication Practices The APS Guidelines for Professional Conduct state that authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the concept, design, execution or interpretation of the research study. All those who have made significant contributions should be offered the opportunity to be listed as authors. Other individuals who have contributed to the study should be acknowledged, but not identified as authors. The sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Plagiarism [i.e. copying from others work without their authorization or acknowledgment] constitutes unethical scientific behavior and is never acceptable. Proper acknowledgement of the work of others used in a research project must always be given. Further, it is the obligation of each author to provide prompt retractions or corrections of errors in published works. Even when it is not clear who wrote the original text, copying without acknowledgment is plagiarism: for example, copying from Wikipedia without citing that source is plagiarism. Self-plagiarism is also unethical. An example is re-submitting a proposal that was already funded, to get a second round of funding for the same project. Hong Kong s RGC bans investigators who do this from submitting further proposals for 5 years. In any text it should be clear which words and which ideas are due to the author(s) and which are due to others. All collaborators share some degree of responsibility for any paper they coauthor. Some coauthors have responsibility for the entire paper as an accurate, verifiable, report of the research. These include, for example, coauthors who are accountable for the integrity of the critical data reported in the paper, carry out the analysis, write the manuscript, present major findings at conferences, or provide scientific leadership for junior colleagues. Coauthors who make specific, limited, contributions to a paper are responsible for them, but may have only limited responsibility for other results. While not all coauthors may be familiar with all aspects of the research presented in their paper, all collaborations should have in place an appropriate process for reviewing and ensuring the accuracy and validity of the reported results, and all coauthors should be aware of this process. 3
4 Every coauthor should have the opportunity to review the manuscript before its submission. All coauthors have an obligation to provide prompt retractions or correction of errors in published works. Any individual unwilling or unable to accept appropriate responsibility for a paper should not be a coauthor. Authors have an obligation to their colleagues and the physics community to include a set of references that communicates the precedents, sources, and context of the reported work. Proper referencing gives credit to those whose research has informed or led to the work in question, helps to avoid duplication of effort, and increases the value of a paper by guiding the reader to related materials. It is the responsibility of authors to have surveyed prior work in the area and to include relevant references. Proper and complete referencing is an essential part of any physics research publication. Deliberate omission of a pertinent author or reference is unethical and unacceptable. Well-known common knowledge (such as the laws of physics) need not be acknowledged. - Responsible Conduct of Research Scientists and educators have a duty to obey rules and regulations regarding the responsible conduct of research and ethical participation in the activities of their department, laboratory, or company. Fabrication of data or selective reporting of data with the intent to mislead or deceive is an egregious [i.e. very bad] departure from the expected norms of scientific conduct, as is the theft of data or research results from others. Collaborations are expected to have a process to archive and verify the research record; to facilitate internal communication and allow all authors to be fully aware of the entire work; and respond to questions concerning the joint work and enable other responsible scientists to share the data. All members of a collaboration should be familiar with, and understand, the process. Peer review [i.e. refereeing papers and proposals] can serve its intended function only if the members of the scientific community are prepared to provide thorough, fair and objective evaluations based on requisite expertise. Although peer review can be difficult and timeconsuming, scientists have an obligation to participate in the process. Privileged information or ideas that are obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for competitive gain. Reviewers should disclose conflicts of interest resulting from direct competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, and avoid cases in which such conflicts preclude an objective evaluation. In addition: All co-investigators of a research proposal should be given the opportunity to approve the final version of the proposal before submission. 4
5 It is unethical to add co-authors only to increase the chance of approval of a proposal and then to drop them to avoid sharing the funds. It is unethical to take someone else s idea, whether published or unpublished (e.g. spoken in a seminar or meeting, or written in a proposal or manuscript that you have been asked to review) and to present it as your own idea. In case of a dispute, the dates of publication or acceptance for publication of an idea are generally used to determine precedence. An instructive and famous recent case: Scientific misconduct by Dr. Jan Hendrik Schön of Bell Laboratories. This case gave rise to some of the APS guidelines quoted above. (The following text is quoted from the official 129-page report by an external committee, with my underlining for emphasis. That report includes numerous graphic examples of specific scientific misconduct.) In late May 2002, the management of Bell Labs formed a committee to investigate the possibility of scientific misconduct, the validity of the data and whether or not proper scientific methodology was used in papers by Hendrik Schön, et al., that are being challenged in the scientific community. These Final Allegations can be grouped into 3 classes: Substitution of data (substitution of whole figures, single curves and partial curves in different or the same paper to represent different materials, devices or conditions) Unrealistic precision of data (precision beyond that expected in a real experiment or requiring unreasonable statistical probability) Results that contradict known physics (behavior inconsistent with stated device parameters and prevailing physical understanding, so as to suggest possible misrepresentation of data) The Committee s main findings and conclusions can be summarized as follows. By all accounts, Hendrik Schön is a hard working and productive scientist. If valid, the work he and his coauthors report would represent a remarkable number of major breakthroughs in condensed-matter physics and solid-state devices. Except for the provision of starting materials by others, all device fabrication, physical measurement and data processing in the work in question were carried out (with minor exceptions) by Hendrik Schön alone, with no participation by any coauthor or other colleague. None of the most significant physical results was witnessed by any coauthor or other colleague. Proper laboratory records were not systematically maintained by Hendrik Schön in the course of the work in question. In addition, virtually all primary (raw) electronic data files were deleted by 5
6 Hendrik Schön, reportedly because the old computer available to him lacked sufficient memory. No working devices with which one might confirm claimed results are presently available, having been damaged in measurement, damaged in transit or simply discarded. Finally, key processing equipment no longer produces the unparalleled results that enabled many of the key experiments. Hence, it is not possible to confirm or refute directly the validity of the claims in the work in question. The most serious allegations regarding the work in question relate to possible manipulation and misrepresentation of data. These allegations speak directly to the question of scientific misconduct. The Committee carefully investigated each of these allegations and came to a specific conclusion in each case. The evidence that manipulation and misrepresentation of data occurred is compelling. In its mildest form, whole data sets were substituted to represent different materials or devices. Hendrik Schön acknowledges that the data are incorrect in many of these instances. He states that these substitutions could have occurred by honest mistake. The recurrent nature of such mistakes suggests a deeper problem. At a minimum, Hendrik Schön showed reckless disregard for the sanctity of data in the value system of science. His failure to retain primary data files compounds the problem. More troublesome are the substitutions of single curves or even parts of single curves, in multiple figures representing different materials or devices, and the use of mathematical functions to represent real data. Hendrik Schön acknowledges these practices in many instances, but states that they were done to achieve a more convincing representation of behavior that was nonetheless observed. Such practices are completely unacceptable and represent scientific misconduct. One of the most troublesome cases is that of superconductivity in polythiophene. Here, identical curves appear multiple times in whole or in part in a single figure. Hendrik Schön acknowledges that these data are not valid but cannot explain how they arose. In the view of the Committee, it is not possible that this set of curves represent real data and therefore this is a clear, unambiguous case of scientific misconduct. In the end, the Committee concluded that, of the 24 Final Allegations examined, Hendrik Schön committed scientific misconduct in 16, some of which were interrelated. Of the remaining 8, 2 were judged to have no clear relationship to publications, while 6 were troubling but did not provide compelling evidence of scientific misconduct. The Committee finds all coauthors of Hendrik Schön in the work in question completely cleared of scientific misconduct. The Committee also finds no evidence that the laboratory practices of any coauthor of Hendrik Schön in the work in question are outside the accepted practices of their fields. In addition to addressing the question of scientific misconduct, the Committee also addressed the question whether the coauthors of Hendrik Schön exercised appropriate professional responsibility in ensuring the validity of data and physical claims in the papers in question. By 6
7 virtue of their coauthorship, they implicitly endorse the validity of the work. There is no implication here of scientific misconduct; the issue is one of professional responsibility. The Committee found this to be an extremely difficult issue, which the scientific community has not considered carefully. Therefore, no clear, widely accepted standards of behavior exist. In order to proceed, the Committee adopted, for working purposes, a minimal set of principles that it feels should be honored in collaborative research. At its core, the question of professional responsibility involves the balance between the trust necessary in any collaborative research and the responsibility all researchers bear for the veracity of the results with which they are associated. The Committee does not endorse the view that each coauthor is responsible for the entirety of a collaborative endeavor: the relative responsibility of researchers with very different expertise, seniority and levels of participation must be considered. The Committee examined this question for each coauthor, considering the nature of their participation and their differing degrees of responsibility. The Committee concluded that the coauthors of Hendrik Schön in the work in question have, in the main, met their responsibilities, but that in one case questions remain that the Committee felt unqualified to resolve, given the absence of a broader consensus on the nature of the responsibilities of participants in collaborative research endeavors. 7
Gail Dodge Old Dominion University
Gail Dodge Old Dominion University Several high profile cases of research misconduct Federal regulation have been enacted American Physical Society (APS) published Guidelines for Professional Conduct in
More informationETHICS IN PUBLISHING OF PAPERS IN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM "METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE"
ETHICS IN PUBLISHING OF PAPERS IN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM "METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE" The International Programme Committee, which additionally performs the function
More informationOutline. Bioethics in Research and Publication. What is ethics? Where do we learn ethics? 6/19/2015
Outline Bioethics in Research and Publication Gertrude Night, PhD Rwanda Agriculture Board What is ethics? History. The purpose of training in research ethics Some ethical principles addressed by research
More informationplural noun 1. a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture. 2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular group, culture,
eth ics plural noun [eth-iks] 1. a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture. 2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular group, culture, etc.: Scientific ethics; Medical ethics;
More informationRegulations. On Proper Conduct in Research TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
Regulations On Proper Conduct in Research TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY 1. Preamble: Tel Aviv University aspires to excellence in research. Excellence is not gauged solely according to research results. It depends
More informationAPPENDIX X POLICY FOR INTEGRITY AND THE RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF SCHOLARSHIP AND RESEARCH: GUIDELINES TO ENCOURAGE RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH PRACTICES
APPENDIX X POLICY FOR INTEGRITY AND THE RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF SCHOLARSHIP AND RESEARCH: GUIDELINES TO ENCOURAGE RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH PRACTICES APPENDIX TO FACULTY BYLAWS Policy for Integrity and the Responsible
More informationPrinciples of publishing
Principles of publishing Issues of authorship, duplicate publication and plagiarism in scientific journal papers can cause considerable conflict among members of research teams and embarrassment for both
More informationCode of Practice on Authorship
Code of Practice on Authorship Introduction All DCU researchers, including research students, should disseminate their research in a timely fashion, and through as effective a means as possible. We have
More informationProcedure for the Investigation of Misconduct (Staff) Approved: Version 1.1 (February 2016) Summary
Procedure for the Investigation of Misconduct (Staff) Summary The Procedure applies to all UWE staff, but not to students. 1. The purpose of the Procedure is to investigate whether research misconduct
More informationPublication ethics- a legal perspective Tamsin Harwood
Publication ethics- a legal perspective Tamsin Harwood taharwood@wiley.com Trust A firm belief in the reliability, truth, or ability of someone or something Oxford Dictionaries- Definition of Trust Publisher
More informationCase Studies in Research Misconduct. Tony Onofrietti, M.S., CRSS
Case Studies in Research Misconduct Tony Onofrietti, M.S., CRSS Director of Research Education The University of Utah 801-585-3492 tony.onofrietti@hsc.utah.edu www.education.research.utah.edu Jackie Hinton
More informationDealing with Authors Misconduct:
Dealing with Authors Misconduct: Difficulties, Dilemmas and Drawbacks B. Gitanjali MD PhD Associate Editor Indian Journal of Pharmacology What is scientific fraud? Deliberate fabrication or falsification
More informationResearch ethics. Law, ethic, ethics Copyright Guidelines for good academic practice. Methodology Kimmo Lapintie
Research ethics Law, ethic, ethics Copyright Guidelines for good academic practice Methodology Kimmo Lapintie Law, ethic, ethics Law as the written code enforced by the monopoly of violence by the state
More informationEVMS Authorship Guidelines
EVMS Authorship Guidelines Many medical schools, including Eastern Virginia Medical School, encourage the publication and dissemination of results from research and other scholarly activities in a manner
More informationScientific Misconduct in Research
Scientific Misconduct in Research Introduction In this assay I will describe and discuss different ethical aspects of scientific misconduct. In the first few paragraphs I will describe and give examples
More informationScientific Ethics. Modified by Emmanuel and Collin from presentation of Doug Wallace Dalhousie University
Scientific Ethics Modified by Emmanuel and Collin from presentation of Doug Wallace Dalhousie University Outline What is scientific ethics Examples of common misconduct Known rates of misconduct Where
More informationBased on the preponderance of evidence, the Scientific Integrity Review Panel (SIRP) finds that
Title: Publication of scientific paper while it was under review by the Scientific Integrity Review Panel. (supplement to ESO-S0000328) Summary of supplemental misconduct (ESO-S0000328): Based on the preponderance
More informationAuthorship. Dennis Brown, Ph. D., Prof. Medicine, Editor Physiological Reviews. With input from:
Authorship Dennis Brown, Ph. D., Prof. Medicine, Editor Physiological Reviews With input from: Caren G. Solomon, Deputy Editor, New England Journal of Medicine, Assoc Prof HMS Tayyaba Hassan - Professor
More informationYahya Zakaria Eid, Ph.D. Faculty of Agriculture,, Kafrelsheikh University
Yahya Zakaria Eid, Ph.D. Faculty of Agriculture,, Kafrelsheikh University yahya.eid@agr.kfs.edu.eg yahyaze@gmail.com http://www.webometrics.info/en/aw/egypt http://www.webometrics.info/en/aw/egypt Jan
More informationScientific Ethics: Issues and Case Studies
Scientific Ethics: Issues and Case Studies Lance Cooper and Celia Elliott Each physicist is a citizen of the community of science. Each shares responsibility for the welfare of this community. - Statement
More informationPublication Ethics The Agony and Ecstasy. Publication Ethics The Road Ahead
Publication Ethics The Agony and Ecstasy John H. Nilson, PhD School of Molecular Biosciences Washington State University Publication Ethics The Road Ahead What Publication Ethics Really Means What Constitutes
More informationMODULE 6 WORK CULTURE AND LEADERSHIP ETHICS
MODULE 6 WORK CULTURE AND LEADERSHIP ETHICS Ed RANDELL CONTENTS OF THIS MODULE Ethics and Laboratory Medicine Defining Ethical Leadership The Foundations of Ethical Leadership in the Clinical Laboratory
More informationResearch Services Research integrity
Research integrity Department of Materials induction session Kathryn Dally Assistant Registrar () 22 January 2014 What is research integrity? Also known as research ethics, good practice in research or
More informationInsights. Originality The research should be relevant-in time and content.
REASONS FOR MANUSCRIPT REJECTION 1 Introduction 1 What makes a good research publication? 1 Why are manuscripts rejected? 2 What to do if a manuscript gets rejected 4 Quick tips for effective research
More informationResponsible Authorship
Responsible Authorship Responsible Conduct of Research Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Faculty Development James B Meigs MD MPH General Medicine Division Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard
More informationJustice Research and Statistics Association CODE OF ETHICS
Justice Research and Statistics Association CODE OF ETHICS Created 1994 Revised 2004 Revised August 2012 Justice Research and Statistics Association 777 North Capitol Street, N.E., Suite 801 Washington,
More informationMINT Incorporated Code of Ethics Adopted April 7, 2009, Ratified by the membership September 12, 2009
The is not intended to be a basis of civil liability. Whether a MINT Incorporated member has violated the standards does not by itself determine whether the MINT Incorporated member is legally liable in
More informationAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY CODE OF ETHICS (Approved March 2016)
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY CODE OF ETHICS (Approved March 2016) I. PREAMBLE (1) Criminology is a scientific discipline and criminologists subscribe to the general tenets of science and scholarship.
More informationJanuary 5, To the Nichols Community,
January 5, 2018 To the Nichols Community, Last May, two Nichols School alumnae wrote us letters revealing a sexual relationship one of them had with a teacher while a student at Nichols. Shortly after
More informationToday we ll look at a framework for addressing any ethical considerations you might face as a scientist.
Today we ll look at a framework for addressing any ethical considerations you might face as a scientist. The image on this slide is intended to illustrate a concept that every American school child earnestly
More informationGuidance on research and publication ethics in Europe
Guidance on research and publication ethics in Europe Simon Godecharle PhD Fellow - Research Foundation Flanders Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law Faculty of Medicine University of Leuven Table of Content
More informationConflict of Interest Policy
Revised 10/13/2016 Conflict of Interest Policy All AMIA leaders have an obligation to make decisions and conduct affairs of the organization based, first and foremost, upon the desire to promote AMIA and
More information2018 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois All rights reserved. 1. A Framework for Ethical Decisions PHYS 496, Celia M.
1 You are now scientists. Science requires its practitioners to be: Honest do not fabricate, misrepresent, manipulate, or destroy data. Careful apply rigorous standards. Skeptical don t want to believe
More informationNational curriculum tests maladministration procedures. March 2007 QCA/07/3097
National curriculum tests maladministration procedures March 2007 QCA/07/3097 Contents 1. Purpose of document... 3 2. Scope... 4 3. General principles of national curriculum tests maladministration investigations...
More informationState of Florida. Sexual Harassment Awareness Training
State of Florida Sexual Harassment Awareness Training Objectives To prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. To define the behavior that may constitute sexual harassment. To provide guidance to state
More informationAnnouncements. Who is Shawn Fanning?
Announcements All presentations in Broun 203 at lab time Find the room a day ahead of time!!!! Bring presentation on CD-R, flash drive, or your own laptop Title slide with names in order of presentation
More informationEthics of Research. A Guide to Practice at Northumbria
Ethics of Research A Guide to Practice at Northumbria 1. Sources of Ethics Policy 2. Importance 3. Ethical Risk Categories 4. Approval Process 5. Key provisions 6. Judgment Issues 7. What next 8. Governance
More informationProtocol for prevention and action in situations of mobbing and sexual harassment
ESADE Mobbing and Sexual Harassment Protocol Protocol for prevention and action in situations of mobbing and sexual harassment This protocol is intended to inform all members of staff of the action to
More informationSome Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience. Henry T. Greely
Some Possible Legal and Social Implications of Advances in Neuroscience Henry T. Greely Introduction Henry T. Greely was a Professor of Law at Stanford University Law School. He discusses the effects neuroscience
More informationPOLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
POLICY ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR STUDENTS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY I. POLICY STATEMENT: Charleston Southern University ("the University") is committed to maintaining a Christian environment for work,
More informationETHICAL ASPECTS OF AUTHORSHIP & PUBLICATION. Joe Henry Steinbach. Department of Anesthesiology Division of Biomedical Sciences
ETHICAL ASPECTS OF AUTHORSHIP & PUBLICATION Joe Henry Steinbach Department of Anesthesiology Division of Biomedical Sciences Program for the Ethical and Responsible Conduct of Science and Scholarship (PERCSS)
More informationToday we ll look at a framework for addressing any ethical considerations you might face as a scientist.
Today we ll look at a framework for addressing any ethical considerations you might face as a scientist. The image on this slide is intended to illustrate a concept that every American school child earnestly
More informationNon-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process
Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process Regions should seek to resolve all disputes involving people in an amicable fashion. Compromise is preferable to more severe forms of resolution. Almost
More informationScientific Misconduct September 15, Presented by May Al Kassar
Research Non-Compliance & Scientific Misconduct September 15, 2010 Presented by May Al Kassar Responsible Research Conduct The ethical conduct of research is a shared responsibility among: The institution
More informationFour authorship criteria from the MSU Authorship Guidelines (http://rio.msu.edu/authorshipguidelines.htm):
1 2 Four authorship criteria from the MSU Authorship Guidelines (http://rio.msu.edu/authorshipguidelines.htm): Authors should demonstrate: Substantial participation in conception and design of the study,
More informationPlease take time to read this document carefully. It forms part of the agreement between you and your counsellor and Insight Counselling.
Informed Consent Please take time to read this document carefully. It forms part of the agreement between you and your counsellor and Insight Counselling. AGREEMENT FOR COUNSELLING SERVICES CONDUCTED BY
More informationThe Chinese University of Hong Kong. Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics
The Chinese University of Hong Kong Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY AND BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH ETHICS A. Scope Survey and behavioural research covers surveys as well as observation
More informationGeriatric Neurology Program Requirements
Geriatric Neurology Program Requirements Approved November 8, 2013 Page 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Institutional Support 3 A. Sponsoring Institution 3 B. Primary Institution 4 C. Participating
More informationDay care and childminding: Guidance to the National Standards
raising standards improving lives Day care and childminding: Guidance to the National Standards Revisions to certain criteria October 2005 Reference no: 070116 Crown copyright 2005 Reference no: 070116
More informationInternational Standards of Good Scientific Practice
International Standards of Good Scientific Practice Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development University of Göttingen 1 Outline 1. Introduction Frequently Asked
More informationDaniel T Lackland. Medical University of South Carolina
Daniel T Lackland Medical University of South Carolina Many ethical concerns must be addressed when research involves human participates. People will accept risks and inconvenience with research that leads
More informationModel Intervention for Students with Substance Abuse Problems Act
Model Intervention for Students with Substance Abuse Problems Act MODEL INTERVENTION FOR STUDENTS WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROBLEMS ACT Table of Contents G-103 Policy Statement G-105 Highlights Section One
More informationAcademy of Management. Code of Ethics
Academy of Management Code of Ethics December 2005 INTRODUCTION The Academy of Management (AOM) Code of Ethics sets forth (1) principles that underlie the professional responsibilities and conduct of the
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES: THE INVESTIGATIVE AUDIT
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES: THE INVESTIGATIVE AUDIT Internal investigations and audits as a line of defense are experiencing greater scrutiny and pressure to provide assurance and
More informationResponsible Conduct of Research: Responsible Authorship. David M. Langenau, PhD, Associate Professor of Pathology Director, Molecular Pathology Unit
Responsible Conduct of Research: Responsible Authorship David M. Langenau, PhD, Associate Professor of Pathology Director, Molecular Pathology Unit Guidelines from the International Committee of Medical
More informationMalpractice in Coursework and Examinations
Malpractice in Coursework and Examinations These notes are in addition to, not a replacement for, the University s Examination Regulations. It is an academic offence for a candidate to commit any act to
More informationPromoting Research Integrity. Show Me the Data! Scientific Approaches to Strengthening Research Integrity in Nutrition and Energetics
Promoting Research Integrity Show Me the Data! Scientific Approaches to Strengthening Research Integrity in Nutrition and Energetics Conference convened by the UAB Nutrition Obesity Research Center New
More informationCOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D. Dr. Deanna Swinamer
COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF NOVA SCOTIA SUMMARY OF DECISION OF INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE D Dr. Deanna Swinamer Investigation Committee D of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia
More information1. Procedure for Academic Misconduct Committees, virtual panels and formal hearings
1. Procedure for Academic Misconduct Committees, virtual panels and formal hearings This procedure should be read in conjunction with the Academic Misconduct Procedure. Staff and students should ensure
More informationAcademic Ethics. Sanjay Wategaonkar Department of Chemical Sciences. 8 th August 2016
Academic Ethics Sanjay Wategaonkar Department of Chemical Sciences 8 th August 2016 Acknowledgements: Prof. Sunil Mukhi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/academic_authorship http://web.mit.edu/policies Introduction
More informationBRESCIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SEXUAL VIOLENCE POLICY. Vice Principal, Students Director, Human Resources
BRESCIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SEXUAL VIOLENCE POLICY Type: Subject: Approving Authority: Responsibility: Related University Policies: Effective Date: Revised: General Sexual Violence Board of Trustees Vice
More informationAuthorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students
Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences Table of Contents Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students...
More informationWHY RESEARCH ETHICS?
WHY RESEARCH ETHICS? Promote the aims of research Promote the values that are essential to collaborative work Accountable to the public Build public support Moral and social values VALUES IN RESEARCH ETHICS
More informationNova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology. Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines
Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines We are grateful to the Ontario Psychological Association and to the College of Alberta Psychologists for making their
More informationPreparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications
Reference Sheet 12 Preparing for an Oral Hearing: Taxi, Limousine or other PDV Applications This Reference Sheet will help you prepare for an oral hearing before the Passenger Transportation Board. You
More informationWhen determining what type of sanction is appropriate, it is advised that a Hearing Panel bear in mind the following:
WILLIAM & MARY LAW SCHOOL HONOR COUNCIL SANCTIONS GUIDE The William & Mary Law School Honor Council Sanctions Guide ( the Guide ) is based on an examination of past Honor Code violation cases and a survey
More informationWhen Ethics Take Flight MIYKAEL REEVE, CGFO & MATTHEW GARRETT, MBA, CGFO, CPM
When Ethics Take Flight MIYKAEL REEVE, CGFO & MATTHEW GARRETT, MBA, CGFO, CPM Ethics Defined Generally The moral principles or values that govern a person or groups behavior or conduct. GFOA Adherence
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 99-2496 (GK) PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. f/k/a PHILIP MORRIS INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM
More informationWorld Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Adopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the: 29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October
More informationScientific Working Group on Digital Evidence
Disclaimer: As a condition to the use of this document and the information contained therein, the SWGDE requests notification by e-mail before or contemporaneous to the introduction of this document, or
More informationGuidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students
Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students Introduction Improving science literacy in the United States requires strengthening science, technology,
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS IN MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES
Are internal investigations in multinational companies systematic? The word investigation comes from the Latin word vestigium, meaning trace or footprint. Investigation itself is the search for the trace
More informationBEING A LEADER and LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP : BEING A LEADER and LEADERSHIP Qemeru Dessalegn Learning good leadership skills and becoming a successful leader are not easy tasks. With this basic introduction of leadership, we can begin
More informationEECERA Ethical Code for Early Childhood Researchers REVISED VERSION 1.2: May 2015
EECERA Ethical Code for Early Childhood Researchers REVISED VERSION 1.2: May 2015 EECERA Working Group: Tony Bertram, Julia Formosinho, Collette Gray, Chris Pascal, Margy Whalley 1 EECERA Ethical Code
More informationQUALITY REVIEW PROGRAM REVIEW OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING ENGAGEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
QUALITY REVIEW PROGRAM REVIEW OF FORENSIC ACCOUNTING ENGAGEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Quality Review Program Review of forensic accounting engagement questionnaire Review Code(s) Reviewer Review Date INTRODUCTION
More informationUniversity of Ghana. Research Ethics Policy
University of Ghana Research Ethics Policy March, 2013 Table of Content 1. Purpose of Policy 3 2. Aims 3 3. Key Definitions.4 4. Scope of Policy.5 5. Basic Ethical Principles..5 6. Institutional Authority
More informationResearch misconduct. Rory Jaffe
Research misconduct Rory Jaffe Kent State Responsible conduct of research Research subject protection Conflicts of interest Data management Mentor trainee relationship Collaboration Authorship and publication
More informationScope of Practice for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Professional
Scope of Practice for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Professional Copyright 1993-2000 Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers, Dallas, Texas USA: All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Organizations which endorse
More informationCompetency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS)
Competency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS) Content Knowledge 1 Content Knowledge: Accuracy of scientific understanding Higher Order Cognitive Skills (HOCS) 3 Analysis: Clarity of Research Question
More informationTermination: Ending the Therapeutic Relationship-Avoiding Abandonment
Termination: Ending the Therapeutic Relationship-Avoiding Abandonment By Elizabeth M. Felton, JD, LICSW, Associate Counsel and Carolyn I. Polowy, JD, General Counsel March 2015. National Association of
More informationThe Supreme Court of South Carolina
The Supreme Court of South Carolina RE: Amendments to South Carolina Appellate Court Rules ORDER Pursuant to Art. V, 4 of the South Carolina Constitution, the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules are amended
More informationZ E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy
TheZenith's Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy Application: Zenith Insurance Company and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Policy
More informationDoes the Metropolitan Police Service, and/or any other security service, have the legal right to conduct themselves in a prejudicial manner?
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: I note you seek access to the following information: Does the Metropolitan Police Service, and/or any other security service, have the legal right to conduct
More informationFramework on the feedback of health-related findings in research March 2014
Framework on the feedback of health-related findings in research March 2014 Summary Scope and background In the course of a study involving human participants, researchers may make a finding that has potential
More informationINTERNSHIP DUE PROCESS GUIDELINES
INTERNSHIP DUE PROCESS GUIDELINES DEFINITION OF PROBLEM For purposes of this document Intern problem is defined broadly as an interference in professional functioning which is reflected in one or more
More informationEthical Issues Surrounding Electronic Communications
Ethical Issues Surrounding Electronic Communications Barbara Bole Williams, PhD, NCSP Professor Director of School Psychology Program Rowan University Glassboro, NJ PA Department of Education Annual Conference
More informationISA 540, Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations
Agenda Item 1-A ISA 540, Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations Introduction 1. Since the September 2016
More informationEFFECTIVE MEDICAL WRITING Michelle Biros, MS, MD Editor-in -Chief Academic Emergency Medicine
EFFECTIVE MEDICAL WRITING Michelle Biros, MS, MD Editor-in -Chief Academic Emergency Medicine Why We Write To disseminate information To share ideas, discoveries, and perspectives to a broader audience
More informationINSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD Policies and Definitions promotes and supports human research. Basic tenets of human research are voluntary participation and the ethical treatment of the subjects in the research
More informationThe Oncofertility Consortium : Policy and Guidelines Statement
The Oncofertility Consortium : Policy and Guidelines Statement Policy and Operations Manual (Effective March 12, 2008) Final Approval by Steering Committee November 20, 2008 Revision Approved 9/15/2009
More informationThe Responsible Scientist The LAB Responsible Conduct of Research
The Responsible Scientist The LAB Responsible Conduct of Research Michelle Moore Research Compliance Officer IRB Administrator Office of Sponsored Programs, Contracts and Grants Elizabeth City State University
More informationPROJECT TEACH: ETHICS DIDACTIC
PROJECT TEACH: ETHICS DIDACTIC Lorraine R. Reitzel, Ph.D. Associate Professor & Associate Chair University of Houston Psychological, Health, & Learning Sciences DECLARATIONS The presenter has no conflicts
More informationEthics Code of Iranian Organization of Psychology and Counseling
Ethics Code of Iranian Organization of Psychology and Counseling Introduction: Item 2 of the constitution of the Iranian Organization of Psychology and Counseling (IOPC advocating clients rights, as well
More informationDiscussion of Changes in the Draft Preamble
Discussion of Changes in the Draft Preamble Prepared by the staff of the IARC Monographs programme 31 August 2005 This paper describes the major changes that appear in the draft Preamble that will be reviewed
More informationResearch Misconduct. Introduction to. Topics, Discussion, and Group Work. Dr Fadhl Alakwaa
Research Misconduct Introduction to Research Misconduct Topics, Discussion, and Group Work Dr Fadhl Alakwaa fadlwork@gmail.com Contents 1. Learning Goals 2. Learning Objectives 3. Pre test 4. Lecture 5.
More informationAPPENDIX A. THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA Student Rights and Responsibilities Code PROCEDURES
APPENDIX A THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA Student Rights and Responsibilities Code PROCEDURES 2017-2018 STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES CODE PROCEDURES - 1 I. Procedural Flexibility The Chair of the Hearing
More informationDRUG TESTING FOR DISTRICT PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO HOLD A COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE
DRUG TESTING FOR DISTRICT PERSONNEL REQUIRED TO HOLD A COMMERCIAL DRIVER S LICENSE School bus drivers and others required to hold a commercial driver s license (CDL) are subject to a drug and alcohol testing
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Effective for assurance reports dated on or after January 1,
More informationGavi Alliance Conflict of Interest Policy Version 2.0
Version 2.0 DOCUMENT ADMINISTRATION VERSION NUMBER 1.0 APPROVAL PROCESS DATE Reviewed by: Gavi Governance Committee 15 April 2009 Approved by: Gavi Alliance Board 2.0 Prepared by: Legal and Governance
More informationUnit 2, Lesson 5: Teacher s Edition 1. Unit 2: Lesson 5 Understanding Vaccine Safety
Unit 2, Lesson 5: Teacher s Edition 1 Unit 2: Lesson 5 Understanding Vaccine Safety Lesson Questions: o What are the main issues regarding vaccine safety? o What is the scientific basis for issues regarding
More information