Attention for Emotional Faces Under Restricted Awareness Revisited: Do Emotional Faces Automatically Attract Attention?

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Attention for Emotional Faces Under Restricted Awareness Revisited: Do Emotional Faces Automatically Attract Attention?"

Transcription

1 Emotion Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 7, No. 2, /07/$12.00 DOI: / Attention for Emotional Faces Under Restricted Awareness Revisited: Do Emotional Faces Automatically Attract Attention? Ernst H. W. Koster, Bruno Verschuere, Benjamin Burssens, Roel Custers, and Geert Crombez Ghent University, Belgium Theoretical models of attention for affective information have assigned a special status to the cognitive processing of emotional facial expressions. One specific claim in this regard is that emotional faces automatically attract visual attention. In three experiments, the authors investigated attentional cueing by angry, happy, and neutral facial expressions that were presented under conditions of limited awareness. In these experiments, facial expressions were presented in a masked (14 ms or 34 ms, masked by a neutral face) and unmasked fashion (34 ms or 100 ms). Compared with trials containing neutral cues, delayed responding was found on trials with emotional cues in the unmasked, 100-ms condition, suggesting stronger allocation of cognitive resources to emotional faces. However, in both masked and unmasked conditions, the hypothesized cueing of visual attention to the location of emotional facial expression was not found. In contrary, attentional cueing by emotional faces was less strong compared with neutral faces in the unmasked, 100-ms condition. These data suggest that briefly presented emotional faces influence cognitive processing but do not automatically capture visual attention. Keywords: attention, faces, emotion, spatial cueing, time-course Ernst H. W. Koster, Bruno Verschuere, Benjamin Burssens, Roel Custers, and Geert Crombez, Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. The authors thank Jan De Houwer for useful comments and Els De Bruycker for aid in the data collection. Ernst Koster is a postdoc fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO), Belgium. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ernst H. W. Koster, Ghent University, Department of Psychology, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Gent, Belgium. ernst.koster@ugent.be Theoretical models of attention for affective information (Öhman, 1993; Öhman, & Mineka, 2001) have assigned a special status to the cognitive processing of emotional facial expressions. It has been argued that faces pose a special class of stimuli with high social and biological relevance. Even before conscious identification, emotional (especially fear-relevant) faces are linked to activation of brain structures (i.e., amygdala) involved in emotion processing (Morris, Öhman, & Dolan, 1998, 1999). In the domain of fear, such findings have been taken as empirical evidence that face processing may involve an innate or biologically prepared dedicated cerebral module that is capable of encoding facial features preattentively (for reviews, see Öhman, Flykt, & Lundqvist, 2000; Öhman & Mineka, 2001). In this regard, it has been argued that threatening faces are more easily associated with aversive stimuli (e.g., Öhman & Dimberg, 1978) and automatically capture attention (Öhman, 2002). These theoretical predictions have instigated a lively empirical debate on automatic processing of emotional facial expressions. Initial studies using measures such as functional MRI (fmri) and event-related potentials (ERP) generally confirm that briefly presented emotional, particularly fearful, faces are associated with heightened activation of neural structures involved in emotion processing and attention (e.g., Lidell et al., 2005; Pourtois, Grandjean, Sander, & Vuilleumier, 2004; Schupp et al., 2004; Whalen et al., 2001). Moreover, in patients with unilateral neglect, there is also strong evidence to suggest that emotional facial expressions capture attention even when presented in the contralesional hemifield (e.g., Vuilleumier, 2000). However, the idea that emotional faces could be processed without attentional resources was challenged by elegant studies, demonstrating that a minimal degree of attention is required for emotional processing of faces (Holmes, Vuilleumier, & Eimer, 2003; Pessoa, Kastner, & Ungerleider, 2002). A specific question in this the context is whether peripheral emotional faces automatically capture visual attention. Brainimaging studies indicate that preattentive processing of emotional compared with neutral faces results, among others, in increased responding in several areas of the visual cortex, which is thought to reflect enhanced attentional orienting to emotional faces (Pessoa et al., 2002). For instance, a recent study event-related fmri study by Pourtois, Schwartz, Seghier, Lazeyras, and Vuilleumier (2006) indicated that when emotional faces were briefly (100 ms) presented as exogenous cues requiring shifts of attention, fearful faces, relative to happy faces, were associated with distinct neural structures involved in the control of spatial attention. However, these specific neuropsychological activities are not always accompanied by enhanced attentional orienting to emotional facial expressions in behavioral tasks (e.g., Pourtois et al., 2006). Close examination of the empirical data from behavioral data reveals that attentional orienting to emotional faces is not frequently found in normal participants. In this study, we examine automatic cueing of spatial attention by emotional faces in a behavioral task. We start with an overview of the available empirical 285

2 286 KOSTER ET AL. behavioral data on attentional orienting to emotional facial expressions. Empirical Evidence on Attention to Emotional Facial Expressions A first line of studies has investigated the face-in-the-crowd phenomenon using the visual search task This task is a wellestablished paradigm from experimental psychology to investigate the automatic versus controlled detection of stimuli (Treisman & Souther, 1985). In a typical version of this task, individuals are asked to indicate the presence of a target stimulus within an array of distracting stimuli. Hansen and Hansen (1988) developed an emotional variant of this task, including pictures of emotional faces to examine attention to angry faces. On half of the trials, one of the faces in the crowd displayed a different emotion than the other faces (i.e., a happy face in an angry crowd and an angry face in a happy crowd). It was found that individuals were faster to locate an angry face in a happy crowd than a happy face in an angry crowd. Because the time needed to detect an angry face in the happy crowd was not affected by the number of distracters, Hansen and Hansen concluded that angry faces were detected automatically. Replications with improved methodology and stimulus material indicate efficient, but not automatic, detection of angry compared with happy faces in the visual search paradigm (e.g., Eastwood, Smilek, & Merikle, 2001; Fox et al., 2000). However, the visual search task has been criticized on several grounds, including the difficulty in separating the attentional effects caused by the targets from the distracters (Koster, Crombez, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004a) and motor preparation as an alternative explanation for reaction time (RT) speeding to emotional faces (Flykt, 2006). Attention for emotional faces has also been investigated in the visual dot probe task (MacLeod, Mathews, & Tata, 1986). In this task, a picture pair comprised of one emotional and one neutral picture is displayed on a screen, with the two stimuli pictures presented at spatially separated locations. After a brief period, these pictures disappear and a small dot is presented at the location of one of the pictures. Systematically faster responding to the dot probe presented at the location previously occupied by the emotional stimulus indicates selective attention for emotional information. A couple of studies examined attention for emotional facial expressions presented for short durations. Three experiments by Mogg and Bradley (1999) revealed that 17-ms masked presentation of angry faces resulted in preferential attention to its location when it was presented in the left visual field. Results were less strong and absent when angry faces were presented at the right visual field or for 34 ms. These findings were not moderated by anxiety level. However, Fox, Russo, and Dutton (2002) conducted an experiment on attention to fearful and happy faces (17 ms, masked) in the dot probe that showed a slightly different pattern of results: Only the high anxious individuals showed attentional orienting toward the fearful faces. Again this effect was only found for threat presented in the left visual field. Thus, empirical data obtained in the dot probe task are still inconclusive. In addition, it has been argued that studies using the dot probe task do not allow distinguishing between the initial engagement of visual attention with and impaired disengagement of visual attention from threat (Fox, Russo, Bowles, & Dutton, 2001). Therefore, the dot probe task may not be the most suitable task to examine attentional orienting to emotional information. The Present Study We set out to further investigate orienting of attention to emotional facial expressions in function of awareness and presentation duration of the emotional information. For this purpose, we presented masked and unmasked emotional facial expressions in a modified exogenous cueing task. In the original exogenous cueing paradigm (Posner, 1980), participants are asked to detect a visual target presented at a left or right peripheral location. On most of the trials, a stimulus precedes the target and validly cues at its spatial location ( valid trials). On the remaining trials, the preceding stimulus is presented at the opposite spatial location of the target and thus invalidly cues the target s location ( invalid trials). In general, faster responding is found on valid trials compared to invalid trials, a finding that is referred to as the cue validity effect. In the emotional modification of this paradigm, the emotional value of the cue is varied (i.e., emotional vs. neutral), which allows investigating attentional engagement and disengagement effects as a function of cue valence. Facilitated attentional engagement by the emotional cue has been related to the attentional capture by emotional information and its initial detection. This effect is evidenced by reaction time benefits on valid trials containing emotional cues compared to valid trials containing neutral cues. Difficulty in disengaging attention from emotional information has been related to attentional holding by threat and is evidenced by slower responding on invalid trials containing emotional cues compared to invalid trials containing neutral cues (Fox et al., 2001). A number of studies have used the modified cueing task to investigate attention for schematic and real emotional expressions (Fox et al., 2001; Fox et al., 2002; Georgiou et al., 2005). In these studies faces were presented for 100 ms, 250 ms, and 600 ms, with 75% valid and 25% invalid trials. It was found that high anxious individuals had difficulty in disengaging from angry faces. In the low anxious participants, usually no preferential attention for emotional faces was observed. Provided the high social relevance of emotional facial expressions, models of attention would predict that faces attract attention in everyone (Öhman & Mineka, 2001). Furthermore, it is surprising that attentional effects were restricted to disengagement as it has been shown that relevant cues also elicit attentional engagement effects in the modified cueing paradigm (e.g., Koster, Crombez, Van Damme, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004b, 2005). The absence of engagement effects may be related to the higher proportion of valid compared with invalid trials. That is, it might be difficult to find faster responding on valid emotional compared with valid neutral trials if orienting to the cues is task-relevant (cf. Mogg & Bradley, 1998). Enhanced attentional engagement has mainly been found in studies using a 50% valid/ invalid proportion (Koster et al., 2004b). In the present study, we further investigated the time-course of attentional orienting to emotional facial using the modified cueing paradigm in unselected participants. Several methodological issues are of key importance in the present study: The emotional facial expressions were presented in the periphery, to the left or right hemifield. In the experiments, the emotional facial expressions were presented under conditions of restricted awareness, using

3 ATTENTION FOR EMOTIONAL FACES 287 backward masking. In Experiments 1A and 2, the emotional faces were presented for 34 ms and subsequently masked by a neutral face for another 66 ms. Such masked presentation should be sufficient to impair conscious recognition of the emotional faces (Esteves & Öhman, 1993). In an unmasked condition, faces were presented for 100 ms (Experiments 1 3). Previous studies have frequently employed jumbled faces as mask. However, with such a procedure it could be that the changes between the emotional face and the mask facilitated attentional capture. Therefore, we used neutral faces as masking stimuli (cf. Esteves & Öhman, 1993). In order to prevent a biased comparison because of larger changes in the masked emotional presentations compared to the masked neutral presentations, the faces used as prime and mask in the neutral presentations had the opposite gender. Responding on the masked emotional faces was compared to responding on masked neutral faces. In Experiment 1B, we presented all faces unmasked to examine whether the masking procedure affected attentional processes. In Experiment 2, an awareness check indicated that individuals could differentiate above chance between emotional versus neutral expressions presented under masked conditions. Therefore, in Experiment 3 masked facial expressions were presented under conditions of more restricted awareness. Experiment 1 In Experiment 1A, we examined whether emotional faces attracted visual attention to their location in masked and unmasked conditions. In order to examine whether the masking stimulus affected the attentional effects obtained in Experiment 1A, we tested whether similar results were obtained when cues were presented in an unmasked version but for similar durations in Experiment 1B. Method Participants. Forty-nine undergraduate students participated for course credit. All participants had normal or corrected-tonormal vision. Materials. The Exogenous Cueing Task was programmed using the Inquisit Millisecond software package (Inquisit 1.32, 2001) and ran on a laptop computer with a 60 Hz, 15-inch color monitor. Inquisit measures response times with millisecond accuracy (De Clercq, Crombez, Roeyers, & Buysse, 2003). All stimuli were presented against a black background. On every trial, a white fixation cross was presented in the middle of the screen, flanked by two white rectangles (6 cm high by 8 cm wide; subtending ). The middle of these rectangles was 7.5 cm (7.2 ) from the fixation cross. Cues and targets were presented in the middle of the rectangles. Cues consisted of emotional and neutral expressions taken from the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faced (KDEF) database (Lundqvist, Flykt, & Öhman, 1998). These pictures were adjusted to exclude interference of background stimuli (hair, clothing). All pictures were digitized to the same size ( pixels) as the white rectangles and were presented in color. On the basis of ratings on the clarity and intensity of the expressed emotion (Goeleven, De Raedt, Leyman, & Verschuere, 2005) we selected 45 pictures as cues: 15 angry, 15 happy, and 15 neutral expressions. Two additional neutral pictures were selected for the masking procedure with one male and one female face. Another 12 pictures with mixed emotional valence were selected for the practice phase. 1 Targets were black squares ( cm; subtending 1 1 ). Responses were made by pressing one of two keys (target left: q, target right: 5 ) with the left and right index finger on an AZERTY keyboard. Procedure. Participants were tested in small groups of a maximum four individuals in a quiet experiment room. In order to reduce any interference between individuals, computers were located in each corner of the room, and participants were instructed to refrain from interaction during the attentional task. At the start of the experiment, an informed consent form was administered. The sequence of events on a test trial consisted of a 500-ms presentation of the fixation cross and white rectangles. The fixation cross remained on screen during the rest of the trial sequence. Then, a pictorial cue appeared for either 34 ms in the masked condition or 100 ms in the unmasked condition. The 34-ms cue was masked by a neutral facial expression for 66 ms, ensuring that only the presentation duration of the cues varied but not the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). The target was presented 17 ms after cue offset and remained on screen until a response was made. Upon responding the next trial started immediately. Participants practiced the attentional task during 12 trials. The test phase consisted of 240 trials. Participants could take a short break after 120 trials. During the test phase, an equal amount of valid (left cue/left target and right cue/right target) and invalid (left cue/right target and right cue/left target) trials were presented. The cues were presented at random for 34 or 100 ms, at the left or right hemifield, with an equal number of presentations for each picture and trial type. Each cue picture was repeated about five times. The masking facial expression had the opposite gender as the preceding cue. Participants were at approximately 60-cm viewing distance from the computer screen to perform the cueing task. Instructions were presented on the computer screen. Participants were asked to respond as quickly as possible to the location of the target without sacrificing accuracy. They were informed that a cue preceded the presentation of the target and that the cue location was not predictive of target location, with some targets following at the cue position and some targets following at the opposite location of the cue. Results Data preparation. On inspection of the data, results from one participant were removed from the analyses because an excessive number of errors and outliers ( 20%). Trials with errors were discarded from analyses (M 1.2%). In line with previous studies (Koster et al., 2004b), RTs smaller than 150 ms and RTs larger than 750 ms were considered outliers because of anticipatory and delayed responding, respectively. Furthermore, RTs deviating more than 3 SDs from the individual mean RT were excluded. Statistical analyses were run on 97.5% of the data. Overall effects. Reaction times were subjected to a 2 (presentation condition: masked, unmasked) 3 (cue valence: angry, happy, neutral) 2 (cue validity: valid, invalid) repeated measures 1 The exact picture numbers and their selection criteria for valence and arousal are available from the authors upon request.

4 288 KOSTER ET AL. analysis of variance (ANOVA). If the higher-order interactions were significant, cue validity effects (reaction time on invalid trials minus reaction times on valid trials) were examined, which provide an easy measure of overall attention for the different cue types. Positive scores indicate attention toward a cue, whereas negative scores indicate attention away from the cue. At this point, we checked for the effects of threat presented at the left versus right visual field. Then, in order to examine our hypotheses related to the specific components of attention, attentional engagement and disengagement scores were calculated. The Greenhouse- Geisser correction (with adjusted dfs) is reported if the sphericity assumption was violated. The mean reaction time data are depicted in Table 1. The ANOVA revealed a significant main effects of presentation condition, F(1, 47) 82.49, p.001, with faster responding on pictures presented for unmasked faces (M 353 ms) than for the masked faces (M 368 ms). There also was a strong effect of cue validity, F(1, 47) 16.92, p.001, due to faster responding on valid (M 355 ms) compared with invalid trials (M 366 ms). The main effect of valence was also significant F(2, 94) , p.001, with faster responses on trials containing neutral faces (M 343 ms) compared to angry (M 368 ms) and happy faces (M 370 ms). Of importance, there was a statistically significant three-way interaction between presentation condition cue valence cue validity, F(2, 94) 17.97, p.001, and the significant two-way interactions between presentation condition cue validity, presentation condition cue valence, and cue valence cue validity could be subsumed under this effect. Mean cue validity effects in function of presentation condition and cue valence are depicted in Figure 1. In order to interpret the three-way interaction effect, separate ANOVAs for each presentation condition were performed. Masked condition. In this condition, there was a significant main effect of cue validity, F(1, 47) 4.48, p.05. No other effects were significant (cue valence cue validity, F(1, 47) 2.20, p.13, other F 1.0), indicating no differential cue of visual attention at this presentation condition. 2 In the absence of this interaction, calculation of attentional engagement and disengagement indices is not warranted. Table 1 Mean Reaction Times (in ms), Standard Deviations, and Cue Validity Indices (CVI) as a Function of Presentation Condition, Cue Valence and Cue Validity in Experiment 1A Cue Valence Cue Validity M SD CVI Masked (34 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Unmasked (100 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Figure 1. Mean cue validity indices (in ms) as a function of presentation conditions and cue valence in Experiments 1 to 3. Unmasked condition. In line with the overall ANOVA, there were main effects of cue validity, F(1, 47) 27.74, p.001, and cue valence, F(2, 76) , p.001. More important, the interaction between cue validity cue valence was also significant, F(2, 94) 21.45, p.001. In order to examine this interaction effect, cue validity indices were calculated for each cue valence. The cue validity effects are depicted together with the mean latencies in Table 1. Paired comparison t tests indicate that the cue validity was significantly larger for neutral pictures than for angry pictures, t(47) 4.45, p.001, and happy pictures, t(47) 6.55, p.001. The difference between angry and happy faces was not significant (t 1.2). As clear from Table 1, responding to trials containing neutral cues was faster compared with trials containing emotional material. Provided that responding to the neutral cues provide the baseline to calculate attentional engagement and disengagement, these indices would be strongly distorted by the general facilitation on trials containing neutral cues (see Yiend & Mathews, 2001). Therefore, these indices are not presented here. 3 Experiment 1B Method Participants. Twenty-four new undergraduate students participated for course credit. All participants had normal or correctedto-normal vision. Materials and procedure. The exogenous cueing task was similar to Experiment 1A, except for the masking procedure. In the present experiment all stimuli were presented unmasked for 34 and 100 ms, respectively. The experiment was run individually to exclude any interference between participants. 2 Previous studies have obtained differential effects in function of cue or target position under masked presentation conditions (e.g., Mogg & Bradley, 1999). An initial ANOVA including the factors cue position and target position instead of cue validity revealed no additional interactions involving spatial factors (Cue Valence Cue Position Target position, F(2, 96) 2.17, p 1.0; all other Fs 2.2). Therefore, we report the ANOVAs using only cue validity as factor. 3 It is noteworthy that the cue validity index does not suffer from this problem because responding on valid trials is subtracted from responding to invalid trials within each valence.

5 ATTENTION FOR EMOTIONAL FACES 289 Results Data preparation. Trials with errors were discarded from analyses (M 2.41%). Outliers were excluded. Statistical analyses were run on 95.9% of the data. Overall effects. The mean reaction time data are depicted in Table 2. The ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of cue validity, F(1, 23) , p.001, with faster responding on valid trials (M 349 ms) compared to invalid trials (M 367 ms). There also was a main effect of valence, F(2, 46) , p.001. Individuals were slower to respond on trials containing emotional cues (angry faces: M 368 ms; happy faces; M 370 ms) compared with neutral (neutral faces; M 336 ms). Of importance, there was a significant three-way interaction between presentation condition cue valence cue validity, F(2, 46) 6.56, p.01. Other interactions could be subsumed under this effect: presentation condition cue valence, F(2, 46) , p.001; presentation condition cue validity, F(1, 23) 3.86, p.06). In order to interpret the three-way interaction effect, separate ANOVA s for each presentation condition were performed. 34-ms condition. The 2 2 ANOVA revealed a main effect of cue validity, F(1, 23) 31.73, p.001. There was trend effect of cue valence, F(2, 46) 2.62, p.08. No significant interaction was found between cue valence and cue validity (F 1.0), indicating no enhanced attentional cue of visual attention by emotional faces at this presentation condition ms condition. The 2 2 ANOVA revealed two main effects: cue validity, F(1, 23) 13.40, p.01 and cue valence, F(2, 46) , p.001. The interaction between cue valence and cue validity was significant, F(2, 46) 9.13, p.001. We further examined this interaction using the cue validity indices. The attentional cueing effect was significantly stronger for neutral faces than for angry faces, t(23) 3.26, p.01 and happy faces, t(23) 3.71, p.01 (see Table 2). Provided these effects, attentional engagement and disengagement indices were not calculated. Table 2 Mean Reaction Times (in ms), Standard Deviations, and Cue Validity Indices (CVI) as a Function of Cue Valence and Cue Validity at 34- and 100-ms Picture Presentation in Experiment 1B Cue Valence Cue Validity M SD CVI Unmasked (34 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Unmasked (100 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Discussion The results of Experiment 1 provided interesting results on the attentional cueing of visual attention by emotional facial expressions. There was a main effect of cue valence at the unmasked condition. That is, delayed responding was observed to emotional facial expressions compared to neutral facial expressions. This reaction time delay suggests that emotional faces did capture attention and demanded processing resources. However, this effect was not associated with stronger cueing of visual attention: First, in the masked condition visual attention was not attracted to the location of the emotional faces. Experiment 1B showed that the absence of effects was not because of the masking procedure. Second, in the unmasked condition, a stronger cue validity effect was found for neutral faces compared with emotional faces. These data provide disconfirming evidence for the idea that emotional faces capture visual attention more strongly than neutral faces. In fact, at the 100-ms cue presentation, even less attention was allocated to the emotional stimuli. In sum, the findings in Experiment 1 indicate dissociable effects of emotional cues on the allocation of attentional resources in general versus spatial attention. That is, the presentation of emotional faces led to delayed responding to the targets, yet emotional facial expressions failed to cue visual attention to their location more strongly than neutral faces. Experiment 2 Given the interesting and somewhat surprising findings of Experiment 1, we tried to replicate the results of Experiment 1A. An awareness check was included to examine whether participants were able to determine the emotional valence of masked emotional faces. In previous studies, awareness of masked emotional stimuli was assessed by determining the percentage of correctly identified features of the emotional stimuli (e.g., Mogg & Bradley, 1999). However, this type of awareness check is highly sensitive to response bias (Swets, 1964; Macmillan & Creelman, 1991). Therefore, Signal Detection Theory (SDT) was applied to provide a measure of awareness. Participants performed a recognition task and SDT was applied to check whether individuals could reliably detect the masked emotional facial expressions. Method Participants. Twenty-four new undergraduate students participated for course credit. All participants had normal or correctedto-normal vision. Materials and procedure. The exogenous cueing task was programmed similar to Experiment 1, with cue presentations of 34 and 100 ms. Awareness check. In order to check for awareness of the masked emotional facial expression a recognition task was administered after the cueing task. In this task only the masked emotional faces were presented under similar conditions as in the attention task. More specifically, pictures were presented randomly to the 4 An ANOVA that included cue position and target position as withinsubjects factor did not reveal any interactions of valence with spatial location (all Fs 1.0). This also holds for Experiments 2 and 3.

6 290 KOSTER ET AL. left and right location with trial duration and picture size similar to the attention task. Instead of responding to the target, participants were now asked to judge whether they had seen an emotional face (a yes-no format). Participants were informed that they might be able to recognize this by small changes and that they could guess if they were unsure. In order to prevent any extreme response biases, participants were informed that emotional faces would be presented more often than neutral faces. There were 10 practice trials and 80 test trials. In the test phase each facial expression was presented about twice. Results Data preparation. Trials with errors were discarded from analyses (M 0.92%). Outliers were removed following the procedure of Experiment 1. Statistical analyses were run on 97.9% of the data. Overall effects. The 2 (presentation condition) 3 (cue valence) 2 (cue validity: valid, invalid) repeated measures ANOVA revealed three main effects of presentation condition, F(1, 23) 20.34, p.001, cue valence, F(2, 46) 40.45, p.001, and cue validity, F(1, 23) 10.20, p.01. Responding on unmasked trials (M 347 ms) was faster than on masked trials (M 357 ms), responding to neutral cues (M 336 ms) was faster than to happy (M 360 ms) and angry cues (M 360 ms), and responding on valid trials (M 346 ms) was faster than on invalid trials (M 358 ms). There was a significant two-way interaction between presentation condition and cue valence, F(2, 46) 14.14, p.001, that could be subsumed under the three way interaction of presentation condition cue valence cue validity, F(2, 46) 7.26, p.01. All other effects were nonsignificant (cue valence cue validity, F(1.62, 37.0) 2.24, p.1; other Fs 1.5). The three-way interaction was followed-up by analyses for masked and unmasked conditions, separately. Masked condition. In the masked condition, the cue valence x cue validity ANOVA revealed the cue validity effect, F(1, 23) 6.20, p.05, with faster responding on valid (M 352 ms) compared with invalid trials (M 362 ms). Notably, there also was a main effect of cue valence, F(2, 46) 3.63, p.05, with faster responding on neutral cues (M 352 ms) compared with happy (M 361 ms) and angry cues (M 358 ms). The interaction between cue valence and cue validity was nonsignificant (F 1.3). Unmasked condition. In this condition, main effects of cue valence, F(2, 46) 35.50, p.001, and cue validity were found, F(1, 23) 9.78, p.01. Again, there was faster responding on valid (M 340 ms) compared with invalid trials (M 355 ms), and faster responding on neutral cues (M 321 ms) compared with happy (M 359 ms) and angry cues (M 363 ms). The two-way interaction between cue valence and cue validity was significant, F(2, 46) 7.91, p.01. Analysis of the cue validity indices clearly show a larger cueing effect for neutral cues compared with the angry, t(23) 2.94, p.01, and happy cues, t(23) 3.87, p.01 (see Table 3). Attentional engagement and disengagement scores are not presented because of overall faster responding to trials containing neutral cues. Awareness check. The proportion Hits and False alarms were converted into the nonparametric indices of sensitivity (A ) and Table 3 Mean Reaction Times (in ms), Standard Deviations, and Cue Validity Indices (CVI) as a Function of Cue Valence and Cue Validity at Masked and Unmasked Conditions in Experiment 2 response bias (B ) (Macmillan & Creelman, 1991). Scores of A range from 0 to 1, with a score of 0.5 indicating sensitivity at chance level. Scores of B range from 1 to 1, with a score of 0 indicating no response bias. Despite our instructions, two participants indicated that they had not seen an emotional face. Their scores did not allow calculation of signal detection measures and were excluded from analyses. We compared mean A to sensitivity at chance level (0.5) using a one-sample t test. Mean A was.68 (SD.07), which differed significantly from 0.5, t(21) 11.35, p.001, indicating that detection of the emotional stimuli is above chance. Mean B was tested against a neutral response criterion (0). Mean B.04 (SD.47) was not different from 0 (t 1), indicating a neutral response criterion. Discussion Cue Valence Cue Validity M SD CVI Masked (34 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Unmasked (100 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid The results of Experiment 2 again showed an overall delay in responding to targets cued by emotional faces compared with neutral faces. In addition, Experiment 2 showed no cueing of spatial attention by emotional facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness and in the unmasked condition emotional faces even attracted less attention than neutral faces. Thus, the pattern of results is similar to the results of the first experiment. One discrepancy between both experiments is that in Experiment 2 delayed responding was found in both the masked and unmasked condition, whereas this effect was only found in the unmasked condition of Experiment 1. At present there is no clear explanation for this difference. It is unclear why the emotional facial expressions failed to attract visual attention. One explanation could be that preattentive effects have been obscured by stimuli presented close to awareness (Mogg & Bradley, 1999). The awareness check showed that individuals could detect above chance level whether an emotional face had been presented. In this situation, controlled attentional processes might have interfered with the automatic processes caused by presentation of emotional stimuli (Greenwald, Klinger, & Schuh, 1995). In Experiment 3 we examined attentional cueing by emotional faces under conditions of more restricted awareness. Experiment 3 An experiment was conducted to examine the unexpected findings with regard to the cueing of spatial attention by emotional

7 ATTENTION FOR EMOTIONAL FACES 291 faces. It could be argued that the findings might be due to the masking procedure, which did not fully prevented conscious awareness of the emotional faces. In previous studies, such conditions led to reduced attentional orienting to emotional information (Mogg & Bradley, 1999). In order to examine cueing of visual attention by emotional faces under conditions of more restricted awareness, the presentation duration of the faces in the masked condition was decreased to 14 ms. This duration was based on previous work by Williams et al. (2004) suggesting that backwardly masked facial expressions presented for less than 20 ms could not be differentiated above chance from a blank screen. A slightly modified awareness check was administered to examine whether participants noticed differences in stimulus change between the emotional and nonemotional trials. Such differences in stimulus change could affect the attentive processing of the masked faces. Method Participants. Nineteen undergraduate students participated for course credit. All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Exogenous cueing task. The cognitive tasks were run on a PC with a 72-Hz, 15-in. Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) screen. This leads to slightly different presentation durations compared to Experiment 1 and 2 but allows more precise stimulus presentation (Wiens et al., 2004). The attentional task was similar to Experiment 1 except for the presentation durations: Pictorial cues appeared for either 14 ms or 100 ms. The 14-ms cue was masked by a neutral facial expression for 83 ms, ensuring that only the presentation duration of the cues varied but not he SOA. The target was presented 14 ms after cue offset and remained on screen until a response was made. Participants were tested individually. Awareness check. After the attention task, participants performed an awareness check. Participants were presented a detection task instead of the recognition task administered in Experiment 2. The present awareness check examined whether participants were able to detect changes in the stimuli due to the masking procedure. This methodology was based on Maxwell and Davidson (2004) who demonstrated that change detection was the most stringent criterion to determine awareness. The emotional faces were presented in a similar fashion as in the attention task. That is, faces were presented randomly at the left or right in a masked or unmasked fashion location. Participants were presented with the choice to indicate whether they saw a single picture or a backwardly masked picture. Participants were instructed that faces could constitute of a single picture or a backwardly masked picture. They were asked to indicate after each face presentation whether they saw a single or a backwardly masked face. Participants were informed that they might be able to recognize this by small changes (e.g., flickering) and that they could guess if they were unsure. In order to prevent any extreme response biases participants were informed that both presentation conditions would appear equally often. This task consisted of a practice and test phase with equal trial numbers as the attention task. The advantage of presenting masked and unmasked stimuli is that it is possible to calculate hits and false alarms that allow application of SDT. Results Exogenous cueing task. Trials with errors were discarded from analyses (M 3.4%). After removal of the outliers, statistical analyses were run on 95.0% of the data. Reaction times were subjected to a 2 (presentation condition: masked/unmasked) 3 (cue valence: angry, happy, neutral) 2 (cue validity: valid, invalid) repeated measures ANOVA. The mean reaction time data are depicted in Table 4. The ANOVA revealed the basic cue validity effect, F(1, 18) 11.69, p.01, with faster responding on valid cues (M 342) than on invalid cues (M 356 ms). Of importance, there was a statistically significant three-way interaction between presentation condition cue valence cue validity, F(2, 36) 5.62, p.01. A marginally significant interaction between cue valence and cue validity, F(1.5, 26.7) 2.97, p.08, could be subsumed under this interaction. All other effects were not significant (presentation cue validity, F(1, 18) 2.97, p.1, all other Fs 1.3). In order to interpret the three-way interaction effect, separate ANOVAs for each presentation condition were performed. Masked condition. In this condition, there was only a significant main effect of cue validity, F(1, 18) 23.65, p.001 with shorter RTs on valid (M 340 ms) compared to invalid (M 357 ms) trial types. No other effects were significant (Fs 1.0), indicating no differential cueing effects at this presentation condition. Unmasked condition. The interaction between cue validity cue valence was significant, F(1.4, 25.4) 8.27, p.01. The main effect of cue valence approached significance, F(1, 18) 3.16, p.09, with slower responding to trials containing angry cues (M 353 ms) compared with happy (M 347 ms) and neutral cues (M 349). In order to examine this interaction effect, cue validity indices were calculated. The cue validity effects are depicted in Table 4. Paired comparison t tests indicate that the cue validity effect was significantly larger for neutral pictures than for angry pictures, t(19) 3.17, p.01, and happy pictures, t(19) 3.96, p.01. The difference between angry and happy faces was not significant (t 1.4). Awareness check. The probability of hits and false alarms were converted to A and B scores. Mean A.59 (SD.08), was significantly different from 0.5, t(18) 5.03, p.001, Table 4 Mean Reaction Times (in ms), Standard Deviations, and Cue Validity Indices (CVI) as a Function of Cue Valence and Cue Validity at Masked and Unmasked Presentation in Experiment 3 Cue Valence Cue Validity M SD CVI Masked (14 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid Unmasked (100 ms) Angry Valid Invalid Happy Valid Invalid Neutral Valid Invalid

8 292 KOSTER ET AL. indicating that detection of changes in the masked condition was slightly but significantly above chance. Mean B.09 (SD.15) did not differ significantly from zero (t 1), indicating a neutral response criterion. Analyses did not reveal differential sensitivity or response bias as a function of cue valence (Fs 1). One individual showed above chance awareness of the masked emotional facial expression (0.83). However, exclusion of this persons data did not change the attentional effects. Discussion In this experiment, we examined whether the absence of attentional cueing by emotional faces under masked conditions was due to near-threshold awareness. A test of awareness, using the stringent criterion of change detection, indicated that individuals still had some awareness of stimulus changes in the masking condition. This effect was unexpected given that previous studies indicate that backwardly masked facial expressions presented for shorter durations than 20 ms cannot be detected (Williams et al., 2004). In our studies, the backwardly masked faces were presented in peripheral vision, which even further impairs detection. Despite that stimulus detection was slightly above chance, no differences were found in detection emotional versus neutral faces. This suggests that the masking procedure was effective in disrupting the processing of stimulus valence. The results of Experiment 3 were similar to the previous findings obtained in Experiment 1 2. Again, we found delayed responding for the emotional stimuli compared with neutral stimuli at 100-ms cue presentation. Moreover, emotional faces did not cue spatial attention more strongly than neutral expressions. In fact, at the 100-ms cue presentation, neutral faces cued attention more strongly than emotional faces. General Discussion From an evolutionary perspective it has been argued that processing of emotional facial expressions has a special status (Öhman & Mineka, 2001). There is a wealth of neuropsychological data suggesting that emotional facial expressions can be processed preattentively and activates structures involved in the orienting of attention. However, data from empirical research do not support this conclusion unequivocally. This study was aimed to further elucidate whether emotional facial expressions attract visual attention in function of awareness and presentation duration of the faces. There were three main findings: (1) Delayed responding was found on trials with emotional cues in the unmasked condition (Experiments 1 3); (2) In both masked and unmasked conditions, the hypothesized cueing of visual attention to the location of emotional facial expression was not found (Experiments 1 3); (3) Attentional cueing by emotional faces was reduced compared with neutral faces in the unmasked condition (Experiments 1 3). These effects are discussed in turn. Delayed Responding to Emotional Facial Expressions The most reliable finding in the present series of experiments was that responding to trials containing emotional cues was slower than responding to trials containing neutral cues. This effect was present in Experiment 1 3 in the unmasked, 100-ms condition. This effect was only found once under masked conditions (Experiment 2). The response interference observed on trials containing emotional cues seems in line with a number of emotion theories and previous studies. In theoretical models on emotion, action tendency is an important element of an emotion and the processing of the emotional information is partly dependent on this action tendency (e.g., Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1997). For instance, processing fear-relevant information is organized to facilitate rapid appraisal and responding to potential threat in the environment. Therefore, it is not surprising that the presence of an emotional stimulus causes interferes with responding to a target that has no association with the emotional stimulus. In line with our findings, it has been found that unmasked (but not masked) presented emotional faces are associated with elevated autonomic arousal (Williams et al., 2004). Although the interference effect did not occur with very brief (14, 34 ms) masked presentation of the cues (except for Experiment 2), it is clear that 100 ms cue presentation was sufficient to instigate this behavioral effect. In previous studies on attention for emotional expressions, similar effects have been interpreted as indicating that emotional faces capture processing resources (Bindemann, Burton, Hooge, Jenkins, & De Haan, 2005). Thus, results of this study may indicate a dissociable effect of emotional cues on spatial attention versus the allocation of attentional resources in general. That is, emotional facial expressions did not attract attention to their location but the presentation of emotional faces led to delayed responding to the targets. However, it should be noted that the interference effect is not necessarily due to attentional effects but could also be explained by other effects such as response-preparation. For instance, it has been found that threatening stimuli can facilitate or delay responding and, thus, can influence interpretation of attentional tasks relying on reaction time measurement (Flykt, 2006). Absence of Facilitated Cueing by Emotional Faces A preliminary issue to address is whether the null findings in the masked conditions are due to insufficient power. To ascertain that the absence of enhanced attentional orienting to emotional faces at the masked condition was a genuine effect, we calculated the number of participants necessary to obtain a significant two-way interaction between cue valence and cue validity in the exogenous cueing task. Using GPOWER (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) we determined the number of participants needed to establish a reliable (power.7) cue validity by cue valence interaction effect. All experiments had sufficient participants if the effect size is large (ƒ 2.35). Only Experiment 1A had sufficient participants to find significant effects if the effect size is medium (power of ƒ 2.74). If the effect size is small (ƒ 2.02), over 400 participants would be required to find effects. Thus, our experiments could only detect a medium-large effect. A recent study on attentional cueing by threat signals in a nonselected sample, indicated that emotional cueing might result in large effect sizes (ƒ 2.66;

9 ATTENTION FOR EMOTIONAL FACES 293 Koster et al., 2004b) 5. Thus, it seems safe to conclude that the present experiments indicate that emotional faces do not capture visual attention in a strong way. Another important question is whether the absence of enhanced attentional cueing effects could be explained by specific features of the exogenous cueing task. Although previous studies have found emotional modulation of attentional cueing (Fox et al., 2001, 2002; Koster et al., 2004b; Yiend & Mathews, 2001), specific features of the exogenous cueing task may partially explain the null-findings. The absence of enhanced attentional cueing by emotional faces compared to neutral faces might be related to the sudden onset of the cues. It has been demonstrated that stimuli that are abruptly presented capture attention regardless of their emotional valence (Yantis, 1996). It could be that, especially at very brief presentation durations, the process of attentional engagement to the cue is related to this abrupt onset and not influenced directly by emotional valence. In addition, it may be that facial expressions, even if they are neutral, already provide a highly salient stimulus. A possibility worth considering is that the realistic neutral facial expressions presented for a short duration, captured attention in order to facilitate conscious appraisal of these stimuli as emotional/nonemotional. This could explain why emotional facial expressions failed to elicit enhanced attentional orienting on top of these effects. However, this explanation does not fit with earlier studies using the KDEF pictures, demonstrating facilitated processing of emotional faces (e.g., Schupp et al., 2004). Reduced Attention for Emotional Faces In Experiment 1 3, we consistently found reduced attention for emotional faces at the 100-ms cue presentation condition. There are a few studies that have previously found reduced attention for emotional information compared with neutral information at brief presentation of stimulus material (Mackintosh & Mathews, 2003). An important question is what drives these effects. One possibility is that with brief cue presentations, the presentation of a salient cue directly followed by a target is associated with impaired target detection because of an attentional blink effect. That is, several recent studies in the context of attentional blink have demonstrated that the presentation of emotional stimuli in a stream of pictures can impair the detection of subsequent targets (Most, Chun, Widders, & Zald, 2005). In these studies, pictures are shown very briefly ( 100 ms) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) and the presentation of an emotional stimulus impairs the detection of a target that is presented within about the next 500 ms. This effect may explain the pattern of findings, with the absence of cueing effects for emotional faces in the masked condition and reduced attention for emotional faces in the unmasked condition. Provided that attentional capture by emotional stimuli is thought to underlie the enhanced attentional blink effect, it remains unclear whether the data of Experiment 1 3 can be regarded as a failure to find attentional cueing effects by emotional faces. The occurrence of an emotion-induced blindness effect with impaired detection of the target after presentation of an emotional cue could be a plausible explanation. Although not reported in detail, we conducted another control experiment examining this possibility, using a short and somewhat longer SOA (100 ms and 250 ms) that did not support the attentional blink explanation. The logic of this experiment was that presenting picture for the same duration (14 ms and 100 ms), but at a longer SOA allowed more time between cue offset and target appearance, which reduces the potential effects of attentional blink effects. In previous work with the spatial cueing task we have observed that fear-conditioned stimuli presented for 200 ms and SOA 214 ms cued visual attention to their location (Koster et al., 2004b, 2005). Presenting the same stimulus material for a longer duration in this control experiment revealed that even under those conditions no significantly stronger cue validity effect emerged for emotional faces. This provides some evidence against that the idea that an attentional blink effect masked an enhanced cue validity effect for emotional faces. However, these data do not exclude the possibility that an attentional blink effect is associated with the reversed cue validity effect for emotional faces. Another explanation for the reduced attention effect could rely on attentional control settings. It has been demonstrated that topdown attentional control can override attentional capture by irrelevant stimuli (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). Attentional control settings may have been applied in the modified Posner task in an attempt to exclude interference of the emotional cues on target responding. Such a strategy could affect attentional capture in this particular task easily because of the task requirements: Only a single cue is presented that is irrelevant to target detection. Therefore, it would be useful to examine whether the same pattern of responding arises in tasks where threatening stimuli are presented in a less predictable way and interfere more strongly with target responding. How do the findings of the experiments fit in the debate on automatic attention for emotional faces? Combined with the neuropsychological data, the delayed responding on trials with emotional faces suggests that even brief (100 ms) presentation of peripheral emotional faces is sufficient to demand attention and cognitive resources. This means that peripherally presented emotional information can be processed highly efficiently. The absence of attentional effects for the backwardly masked emotional faces may be in line with recent findings that at least some degree of attention is necessary for emotion processing to occur (Pessoa et al., 2002). It could be that peripheral presented faces needs to be processed to a certain degree before enhanced shifts of visual attention for emotional stimuli are found. It may be that differential attentional orienting for emotional versus nonemotional stimuli is only observed at slightly longer durations or with more ecologically valid stimulus displays (multiple stimuli). In fact, there are a number of studies examining attention for emotional faces combining a dot probe task (multiple stimuli) with neuropsychological measures (Armony & Dolan, 2002; Pourtois et al., 2004). These studies indicate that brief presentation of emotional faces capture attention as evidenced by the behavioral data and neuropsychological responding. This work should be extended to backwardly masked emotional facial expressions. A surprising effect in the present studies was the absence of facilitated detection of emotional information in the awareness checks. There is some evidence to suggest that negative emotional expression can be detected more efficiently than neutral expres- 5 This effect-size was obtained at the acquisition phase for the Cue valence Cue validity interaction. This study was selected as it is one of the few studies on attention for emotional information in nonselected samples.

Does Imminent Threat Capture and Hold Attention?

Does Imminent Threat Capture and Hold Attention? Emotion Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association 2004, Vol. 4, No. 3, 312 317 1528-3542/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.312 Does Imminent Threat Capture and Hold Attention? Ernst H.

More information

Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions

Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (1), 159-165 Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions SOWON HAHN AND SCOTT D. GRONLUND University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma Using a visual search

More information

Visual Awareness and the Detection of Fearful Faces

Visual Awareness and the Detection of Fearful Faces Emotion Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association 2005, Vol. 5, No. 2, 243 247 1528-3542/05/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.243 Visual Awareness and the Detection of Fearful Faces Luiz

More information

Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures

Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54A (3), 665 681 Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures Jenny Yiend and Andrew Mathews MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK

More information

the remaining half of the arrays, a single target image of a different type from the remaining

the remaining half of the arrays, a single target image of a different type from the remaining 8 the remaining half of the arrays, a single target image of a different type from the remaining items was included. Participants were asked to decide whether a different item was included in the array,

More information

Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces

Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces Europe PMC Funders Group Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Vis cogn. 2005 ; 12(1): 145 158. doi:10.1080/13506280444000076. Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional

More information

BRIEF REPORT. December 18, 2009

BRIEF REPORT. December 18, 2009 Emotion-induced AB and social anxiety 1 Running Head: Emotion-induced AB and social anxiety De Jong, P.J., Koster, E.H.W., van Wees, R., & Martens, A.M. (2010). Angry facial expressions hamper subsequent

More information

The Fearful-Face Advantage Is Modulated by Task Demands: Evidence From the Attentional Blink

The Fearful-Face Advantage Is Modulated by Task Demands: Evidence From the Attentional Blink Emotion 2010 American Psychological Association 2010, Vol. 10, No. 1, 136 140 1528-3542/10/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0017814 BRIEF REPORTS The Fearful-Face Advantage Is Modulated by Task Demands: Evidence From

More information

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE This article was downloaded by: [Michigan State University] On: 16 September 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 908165840] Publisher Psychology Press Informa Ltd Registered in England

More information

Attentional Capture Under High Perceptual Load

Attentional Capture Under High Perceptual Load Psychonomic Bulletin & Review In press Attentional Capture Under High Perceptual Load JOSHUA D. COSMAN AND SHAUN P. VECERA University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa Attentional capture by abrupt onsets can be

More information

Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary?

Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? Perception & Psychophysics 28, 7 (8), 1416-1434 doi: 1.3758/PP.7.8.1416 Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? GERNOT HORSTMANN Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

More information

Functional Fixedness: The Functional Significance of Delayed Disengagement Based on Attention Set

Functional Fixedness: The Functional Significance of Delayed Disengagement Based on Attention Set In press, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Functional Fixedness: The Functional Significance of Delayed Disengagement Based on Attention Set Timothy J. Wright 1, Walter

More information

No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments

No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments No prior entry for threat-related faces 1 1 Running head: NO PRIOR ENTRY FOR THREAT-RELATED FACES 2 3 4 No prior entry for threat-related faces: Evidence from temporal order judgments 5 6 Antonio Schettino

More information

The Detection of Fear-Relevant Stimuli: Are Guns Noticed as Quickly as Snakes?

The Detection of Fear-Relevant Stimuli: Are Guns Noticed as Quickly as Snakes? Emotion Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association 2007, Vol. 7, No. 4, 691 696 1528-3542/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.691 The Detection of Fear-Relevant Stimuli: Are Guns Noticed

More information

Attention and Scene Perception

Attention and Scene Perception Theories of attention Techniques for studying scene perception Physiological basis of attention Attention and single cells Disorders of attention Scene recognition attention any of a large set of selection

More information

Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations?

Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations? Psychon Bull Rev (2011) 18:309 315 DOI 10.3758/s13423-010-0045-x Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations? Ryoichi Nakashima & Kazuhiko Yokosawa Published online:

More information

1 Visual search for emotional expressions: Effect of stimulus set on anger and happiness. superiority

1 Visual search for emotional expressions: Effect of stimulus set on anger and happiness. superiority 1 Visual search for emotional expressions: Effect of stimulus set on anger and happiness superiority Ruth A. Savage 1, Stefanie I. Becker 1 & Ottmar V. Lipp 2 1 School of Psychology, University of Queensland,

More information

Trait Anxiety and Perceptual Load as Determinants of Emotion Processing in a Fear Conditioning Paradigm

Trait Anxiety and Perceptual Load as Determinants of Emotion Processing in a Fear Conditioning Paradigm Emotion 2011 American Psychological Association 2012, Vol. 12, No. 2, 236 249 1528-3542/11/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0025321 Trait Anxiety and Perceptual Load as Determinants of Emotion Processing in a Fear

More information

The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is task dependent

The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is task dependent Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16 (1), 104-109 doi:10.3758/pbr.16.1.104 The effect of fearful s on the attentional blink is task dependent TIMO STEIN Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany

More information

2/27/2014. What is Attention? What is Attention? Space- and Object-Based Attention

2/27/2014. What is Attention? What is Attention? Space- and Object-Based Attention Space- and Object-Based Attention Attention 1 What is Attention? William James Principles of Psychology Everyone knows what attention is. It is the taking possession by the mind in clear and vivid form,

More information

Infant Behavior and Development

Infant Behavior and Development Infant Behavior & Development 33 (2010) 245 249 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Infant Behavior and Development Brief report Developmental changes in inhibition of return from 3 to 6 months of

More information

The Meaning of the Mask Matters

The Meaning of the Mask Matters PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Report The Meaning of the Mask Matters Evidence of Conceptual Interference in the Attentional Blink Paul E. Dux and Veronika Coltheart Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science,

More information

Supplementary experiment: neutral faces. This supplementary experiment had originally served as a pilot test of whether participants

Supplementary experiment: neutral faces. This supplementary experiment had originally served as a pilot test of whether participants Supplementary experiment: neutral faces This supplementary experiment had originally served as a pilot test of whether participants would automatically shift their attention towards to objects the seen

More information

Effects of Task Relevance and Stimulus-Driven Salience in Feature-Search Mode

Effects of Task Relevance and Stimulus-Driven Salience in Feature-Search Mode Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1019 1031 Copyright 2004 by the American Psychological Association 0096-1523/04/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.6.1019

More information

Effect of Pre-Presentation of a Frontal Face on the Shift of Visual Attention Induced by Averted Gaze

Effect of Pre-Presentation of a Frontal Face on the Shift of Visual Attention Induced by Averted Gaze Psychology, 2014, 5, 451-460 Published Online April 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/psych http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.55055 Effect of Pre-Presentation of a Frontal Face on the Shift

More information

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Vision Research xxx (2008) xxx xxx. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Vision Research

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Vision Research xxx (2008) xxx xxx. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Vision Research Vision Research xxx (2008) xxx xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Vision Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction

More information

Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task

Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 (2007) 607 615 Shorter communication Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task Elske Salemink a,,

More information

Fear detection and visual awareness in perceiving bodily expressions Stienen, B.M.C.; de Gelder, Bea

Fear detection and visual awareness in perceiving bodily expressions Stienen, B.M.C.; de Gelder, Bea Tilburg University Fear detection and visual awareness in perceiving bodily expressions Stienen, B.M.C.; de Gelder, Bea Published in: Emotion Document version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of

More information

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution

More information

Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP

Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP 1 Blinded by Emotion: Target Misses Follow Attention Capture by Arousing Distractors in RSVP Karen M. Arnell Kassandra V. Killman & David Fijavz Brock University Participants are usually able to search

More information

ROAR, the University of East London Institutional Repository:

ROAR, the University of East London Institutional Repository: ROAR, the University of East London Institutional Repository: http://roar.uel.ac.uk This article is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document

More information

To appear in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning

To appear in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning Activation of effect codes in response planning - 1 - To appear in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning Michael Ziessler

More information

Running head: DISTINCT TEMPORAL PROCESSING OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS. Distinct Temporal Processing of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Facial Expressions

Running head: DISTINCT TEMPORAL PROCESSING OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS. Distinct Temporal Processing of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Facial Expressions Running head: DISTINCT TEMPORAL PROCESSING OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS Distinct Temporal Processing of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Facial Expressions Peter J. de Jong 1, Ernst H.W. Koster 2, Ineke Wessel 1, and

More information

Templates for Rejection: Configuring Attention to Ignore Task-Irrelevant Features

Templates for Rejection: Configuring Attention to Ignore Task-Irrelevant Features Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, Vol. 38, No. 3, 580 584 2012 American Psychological Association 0096-1523/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0027885 OBSERVATION Templates

More information

Irrelevant features at fixation modulate saccadic latency and direction in visual search

Irrelevant features at fixation modulate saccadic latency and direction in visual search VISUAL COGNITION, 0000, 00 (0), 111 Irrelevant features at fixation modulate saccadic latency and direction in visual search Walter R. Boot Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee,

More information

Attentional Capture in Singleton-Detection and Feature-Search Modes

Attentional Capture in Singleton-Detection and Feature-Search Modes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1003 1020 Copyright 2003 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0096-1523/03/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1003

More information

Are Retrievals from Long-Term Memory Interruptible?

Are Retrievals from Long-Term Memory Interruptible? Are Retrievals from Long-Term Memory Interruptible? Michael D. Byrne byrne@acm.org Department of Psychology Rice University Houston, TX 77251 Abstract Many simple performance parameters about human memory

More information

Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat?

Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy 41 (2003) 1325 1335 www.elsevier.com/locate/brat Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat?

More information

Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize attention: a classical conditioning. approach

Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize attention: a classical conditioning. approach 1 Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize attention: a classical conditioning approach Lies Notebaert, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, and Jan De Houwer, Ghent University, Belgium Jan Theeuwes

More information

Grouped Locations and Object-Based Attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994)

Grouped Locations and Object-Based Attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994) Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, Vol. 123, No. 3, 316-320 Copyright 1994 by the American Psychological Association. Inc. 0096-3445/94/S3.00 COMMENT Grouped Locations and Object-Based Attention:

More information

The Influence of the Attention Set on Exogenous Orienting

The Influence of the Attention Set on Exogenous Orienting The Influence of the Attention Set on Exogenous Orienting Ahnate Lim (ahnate@hawaii.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2530 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA Scott Sinnett (ssinnett@hawaii.edu)

More information

The Impact of Emotion on Perception Bias or Enhanced Processing?

The Impact of Emotion on Perception Bias or Enhanced Processing? PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Report The Impact of Emotion on Perception Bias or Enhanced Processing? René Zeelenberg, 1 Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, 2 and Mark Rotteveel 2 1 Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam,

More information

The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR

The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (2), 327-331 The time required for perceptual (nonmotoric) processing in IOR THOMAS M. SPALEK AND VINCENT DI LOLLO Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia,

More information

Visual attention to emotion in depression: Facilitation and withdrawal processes

Visual attention to emotion in depression: Facilitation and withdrawal processes COGNITION AND EMOTION 2012, 26 (4), 602614 Visual attention to emotion in depression: Facilitation and withdrawal processes Blair E. Wisco 1, Teresa A. Treat 2, and Andrew Hollingworth 2 1 Department of

More information

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION. Integrating Behavioral and Electrocortical Measures of Attentional Bias Toward Threat

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION. Integrating Behavioral and Electrocortical Measures of Attentional Bias Toward Threat 11 INTRODUCTION Integrating Behavioral and Electrocortical Measures of Attentional Bias Toward Threat Annmarie MacNamara, Emily S. Kappenman, Sarah R. Black, Jennifer N. Bress, and Greg Hajcak The term

More information

The Attentional Blink is Modulated by First Target Contrast: Implications of an Attention Capture Hypothesis

The Attentional Blink is Modulated by First Target Contrast: Implications of an Attention Capture Hypothesis The Attentional Blink is Modulated by First Target Contrast: Implications of an Attention Capture Hypothesis Simon Nielsen * (sini@imm.dtu.dk) Tobias S. Andersen (ta@imm.dtu.dk) Cognitive Systems Section,

More information

Attentional bias during emotional processing Parra Rodriguez, Mario; Sánchez Cuellar, Manuel Guillermo; Valencia, Stella; Trijillo, Natalia

Attentional bias during emotional processing Parra Rodriguez, Mario; Sánchez Cuellar, Manuel Guillermo; Valencia, Stella; Trijillo, Natalia Heriot-Watt University Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Attentional bias during emotional processing Parra Rodriguez, Mario; Sánchez Cuellar, Manuel Guillermo; Valencia, Stella; Trijillo, Natalia

More information

2/19/2011. Joseph Bardeen, M.A. Northern Illinois University February 18, 2011

2/19/2011. Joseph Bardeen, M.A. Northern Illinois University February 18, 2011 Lifetime prevalence estimates for PTSD are about 8%; however, the majority of Americans experience a traumatic event in their lifetimes (Kessler et al, 1995: NCS) Joseph Bardeen, M.A. Northern Illinois

More information

Attentional biases in processing emotional facial expressions: Effects of state anxiety, trait anxiety and awareness

Attentional biases in processing emotional facial expressions: Effects of state anxiety, trait anxiety and awareness Bond University epublications@bond Faculty of Society and Design Publications Faculty of Society and Design 11-4-2014 Attentional biases in processing emotional facial expressions: Effects of state anxiety,

More information

HAPPINESS SUPERIORITY EFFECT FOR SCHEMATIC FACES 1. Different Faces in the Crowd: A Happiness Superiority Effect for Schematic Faces in

HAPPINESS SUPERIORITY EFFECT FOR SCHEMATIC FACES 1. Different Faces in the Crowd: A Happiness Superiority Effect for Schematic Faces in HAPPINESS SUPERIORITY EFFECT FOR SCHEMATIC FACES 1 Different Faces in the Crowd: A Happiness Superiority Effect for Schematic Faces in Heterogeneous Backgrounds Belinda M. Craig, Stefanie I. Becker, &

More information

The Time Course of Attentional Disengagement from Angry Faces in. Social Anxiety

The Time Course of Attentional Disengagement from Angry Faces in. Social Anxiety Time Course of Attentional Disengagement 1 Running head: ATTENTIONAL DISENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL ANXIETY The Time Course of Attentional Disengagement from Angry Faces in Social Anxiety Jun Moriya 1,2 and Yoshihiko

More information

RUNNING HEAD: COHERENCE IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK. Helen Tibboel. Jan De Houwer. Adriaan Spruyt. Geert Crombez

RUNNING HEAD: COHERENCE IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK. Helen Tibboel. Jan De Houwer. Adriaan Spruyt. Geert Crombez THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK 1 RUNNING HEAD: COHERENCE IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK The Attentional Blink is diminished for targets that form coherent semantic categories Helen Tibboel Jan De Houwer Adriaan Spruyt

More information

Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety linked attention bias in visual search

Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety linked attention bias in visual search Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety linked attention bias in visual search Article Accepted Version Dodd, H. F., Vogt, J., Turkileri, N. and Notebaert, L. (2017) Task relevance of emotional

More information

Object Substitution Masking: When does Mask Preview work?

Object Substitution Masking: When does Mask Preview work? Object Substitution Masking: When does Mask Preview work? Stephen W. H. Lim (psylwhs@nus.edu.sg) Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Block AS6, 11 Law Link, Singapore 117570 Chua

More information

Parafoveal Semantic Processing of Emotional Visual Scenes

Parafoveal Semantic Processing of Emotional Visual Scenes Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, Vol. 31, No. 3, 502 519 Copyright 2005 by the American Psychological Association 0096-1523/05/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.502

More information

The path of visual attention

The path of visual attention Acta Psychologica 121 (2006) 199 209 www.elsevier.com/locate/actpsy The path of visual attention James M. Brown a, *, Bruno G. Breitmeyer b, Katherine A. Leighty a, Hope I. Denney a a Department of Psychology,

More information

Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable. threatening stimuli.

Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable. threatening stimuli. 1 Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli. Lies Notebaert*, Geert Crombez, and Stefaan Van Damme, Jan De Houwer Ghent University, Belgium Jan Theeuwes

More information

Sequential Effects in Spatial Exogenous Cueing: Theoretical and Methodological Issues

Sequential Effects in Spatial Exogenous Cueing: Theoretical and Methodological Issues Sequential Effects in Spatial Exogenous Cueing: Theoretical and Methodological Issues Alessandro Couyoumdjian (alessandro.couyoumdjian@uniroma1.it) Faculty of Psychology 1, University La Sapienza via dei

More information

Exploring the Function of Selective Attention and Hypervigilance for Threat in Anxiety

Exploring the Function of Selective Attention and Hypervigilance for Threat in Anxiety Accepted Manuscript Exploring the Function of Selective Attention and Hypervigilance for Threat in Anxiety Helen J. Richards, Valerie Benson, Nick Donnelly, Julie A. Hadwin PII: S0272-7358(13)00136-0 DOI:

More information

The number line effect reflects top-down control

The number line effect reflects top-down control Journal Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006,?? 13 (?), (5),862-868???-??? The number line effect reflects top-down control JELENA RISTIC University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

More information

Random visual noise impairs object-based attention

Random visual noise impairs object-based attention Exp Brain Res (2002) 142:349 353 DOI 10.1007/s00221-001-0899-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Richard A. Abrams Mark B. Law Random visual noise impairs object-based attention Received: 10 May 2000 / Accepted: 4 September

More information

Katarzyna Majtyka. BAPsych(Hons)(Laurentian), MPsych(Clin)(Bond), PhD(Candidate)(Bond), MAPS MCCLP. School of Psychology.

Katarzyna Majtyka. BAPsych(Hons)(Laurentian), MPsych(Clin)(Bond), PhD(Candidate)(Bond), MAPS MCCLP. School of Psychology. Katarzyna Majtyka BAPsych(Hons)(Laurentian), MPsych(Clin)(Bond), PhD(Candidate)(Bond), MAPS MCCLP School of Psychology Bond University Relationship between Trait Anxiety, State Anxiety and Awareness in

More information

Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture

Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture Atten Percept Psychophys (2012) 74:1183 1198 DOI 10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9 Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture

More information

Automatic detection, consistent mapping, and training * Originally appeared in

Automatic detection, consistent mapping, and training * Originally appeared in Automatic detection - 1 Automatic detection, consistent mapping, and training * Originally appeared in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1986, 24 (6), 431-434 SIU L. CHOW The University of Wollongong,

More information

Satiation in name and face recognition

Satiation in name and face recognition Memory & Cognition 2000, 28 (5), 783-788 Satiation in name and face recognition MICHAEL B. LEWIS and HADYN D. ELLIS Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales Massive repetition of a word can lead to a loss of

More information

Derakshan, N., & Koster, E.H.W. (2010). Processing efficiency in visual search in

Derakshan, N., & Koster, E.H.W. (2010). Processing efficiency in visual search in 1 Derakshan, N., & Koster, E.H.W. (2010). Processing efficiency in visual search in anxiety: An eye-movement registration study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 1180-1185. Processing efficiency in

More information

Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search

Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11 (4), 697-702 Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search JAN THEEUWES Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands and ARTHUR F. KRAMER and

More information

Children s selective attention to pain and avoidance behaviour: The role of child and

Children s selective attention to pain and avoidance behaviour: The role of child and Children s selective attention to pain and avoidance behaviour: The role of child and parental catastrophizing about pain Vervoort, T., PhD 1, Trost, Z. PhD 2, Van Ryckegem, DML. PhD 1 1 Department of

More information

Distracted by Pleasure: Effects of Positive Versus Negative Valence on Emotional. Capture Under Load. Rashmi Gupta, Young-Jin Hur, and Nilli Lavie

Distracted by Pleasure: Effects of Positive Versus Negative Valence on Emotional. Capture Under Load. Rashmi Gupta, Young-Jin Hur, and Nilli Lavie Distracted by pleasure 1 Running Head: Distracted by pleasure Distracted by Pleasure: Effects of Positive Versus Negative Valence on Emotional Capture Under Load Rashmi Gupta, Young-Jin Hur, and Nilli

More information

Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: Evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return

Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: Evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return Memory & Cognition 2009, 37 (6), 935-944 doi:10.3758/mc.37.6.935 Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: Evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return JONG MOON CHOI

More information

Attentional Window and Global/Local Processing

Attentional Window and Global/Local Processing University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 6-16-2016 Attentional Window and Global/Local Processing Steven Peter Schultz University of South Florida,

More information

A Behavioral Attention Task for Investigating Rumination in Borderline Personality Disorder: Final Report

A Behavioral Attention Task for Investigating Rumination in Borderline Personality Disorder: Final Report Kaleidoscope Volume 11 Article 68 July 2014 A Behavioral Attention Task for Investigating Rumination in Borderline Personality Disorder: Final Report Jacob Folsom Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kaleidoscope

More information

A Method for Assessing Attentional Bias in Anxious Rats. A Senior Honors Thesis

A Method for Assessing Attentional Bias in Anxious Rats. A Senior Honors Thesis Attentional Bias 1 A Method for Assessing Attentional Bias in Anxious Rats A Senior Honors Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation with distinction in Psychology in the

More information

VISUAL ATTENTION MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE EMOTIONAL DOT PROBE TASK. Melville M. Malone. Thesis. Submitted to the faculty of the

VISUAL ATTENTION MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE EMOTIONAL DOT PROBE TASK. Melville M. Malone. Thesis. Submitted to the faculty of the VISUAL ATTENTION MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE EMOTIONAL DOT PROBE TASK By Melville M. Malone Thesis Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of requirements

More information

Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces

Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces Neuroscience Letters xxx (2005) xxx xxx Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces Amanda Holmes a,, Monika Kiss b, Martin Eimer b a School of Human and Life Sciences,

More information

Limitations of Object-Based Feature Encoding in Visual Short-Term Memory

Limitations of Object-Based Feature Encoding in Visual Short-Term Memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, Vol. 28, No. 2, 458 468 Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0096-1523/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.458

More information

Project exam in Cognitive Psychology PSY1002. Autumn Course responsible: Kjellrun Englund

Project exam in Cognitive Psychology PSY1002. Autumn Course responsible: Kjellrun Englund Project exam in Cognitive Psychology PSY1002 Autumn 2007 674107 Course responsible: Kjellrun Englund Stroop Effect Dual processing causing selective attention. 674107 November 26, 2007 Abstract This document

More information

Running head: PREDICTIVE POWER OF INDIRECT MEASURES. Differential Predictive Power of Self Report and Implicit Measures on Behavioural and

Running head: PREDICTIVE POWER OF INDIRECT MEASURES. Differential Predictive Power of Self Report and Implicit Measures on Behavioural and PREDICTIVE POWER OF INDIRECT MEASURES 1 Running head: PREDICTIVE POWER OF INDIRECT MEASURES Differential Predictive Power of Self Report and Implicit Measures on Behavioural and Physiological Fear Responses

More information

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Emotion. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 13.

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Emotion. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 13. NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2009 August ; 9(4): 560 565. doi:10.1037/a0015806. Fearful Faces But Not Fearful Eyes Alone Delay Attention Disengagement

More information

(Visual) Attention. October 3, PSY Visual Attention 1

(Visual) Attention. October 3, PSY Visual Attention 1 (Visual) Attention Perception and awareness of a visual object seems to involve attending to the object. Do we have to attend to an object to perceive it? Some tasks seem to proceed with little or no attention

More information

Cognition 115 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Cognition. journal homepage:

Cognition 115 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Cognition. journal homepage: Cognition 115 (2010) 202 206 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cognition journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Brief article Auditory emotional cues enhance visual perception René Zeelenberg

More information

Running head: INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS AND UNAWARE CONDITIONING 1

Running head: INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS AND UNAWARE CONDITIONING 1 Running head: INTEROCEPTIVE AWARENESS AND UNAWARE CONDITIONING 1 Interoceptive awareness and unaware fear conditioning: Are subliminal conditioning effects influenced by the manipulation of visceral self-perception?

More information

Original Papers. Attention-driven bias for threat-related stimuli in implicit memory. Preliminary results from the Posner cueing paradigm

Original Papers. Attention-driven bias for threat-related stimuli in implicit memory. Preliminary results from the Posner cueing paradigm Original Papers Polish Psychological Bulletin 2010, vol. 41 (4), 163-171 DOI - 10.2478/v10059-010-0021-3 Jakub Traczyk *,** Paweł J. Matusz *** Agata Sobków * Attention-driven bias for threat-related stimuli

More information

RUNNING HEAD: RESPONSE BIAS IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK. Is the emotional modulation of the attentional blink driven by response bias?

RUNNING HEAD: RESPONSE BIAS IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK. Is the emotional modulation of the attentional blink driven by response bias? ATTENTIONAL BLINK 1 RUNNING HEAD: RESPONSE BIAS IN THE ATTENTIONAL BLINK Is the emotional modulation of the attentional blink driven by response bias? Helen Tibboel Bram Van Bockstaele Jan De Houwer Department

More information

In search of the emotional face: Anger vs. happiness superiority in visual search

In search of the emotional face: Anger vs. happiness superiority in visual search 1 In search of the emotional face: Anger vs. happiness superiority in visual search Ruth A. Savage, Ottmar V. Lipp, Belinda M. Craig, Stefanie I. Becker School of Psychology, University of Queensland,

More information

The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized

The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized W. Gevers et al. / Cognition 87 (2003) B87 B95 B87 Cognition 87 (2003) B87 B95 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Brief article The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized Wim Gevers*,

More information

Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage

Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69 (4), 606-618 Shifting attention into and out of objects: Evaluating the processes underlying the object advantage JAMES M. BROWN AND HOPE I. DENNEY University of Georgia,

More information

Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention 1

Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention 1 Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 28, No. 3, September 2004 ( C 2004) Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention 1 Manuel G. Calvo 2,4 and Peter J. Lang 3 Pictures of

More information

Attention to Fear-Relevant Stimuli by Adults and Young Children

Attention to Fear-Relevant Stimuli by Adults and Young Children Research Article Attention to Fear-Relevant Stimuli by Adults and Young Children Vanessa LoBue and Judy S. DeLoache University of Virginia Fear of snakes found in humans and primates Some theorists hypothesize

More information

Attentional Capture With Rapidly Changing Attentional Control Settings

Attentional Capture With Rapidly Changing Attentional Control Settings Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1 16 2010 American Psychological Association 0096-1523/10/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0015875 Attentional Capture With

More information

Running head: INDIRECT EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON MEMORY 1. The Indirect Effect of Attention Bias on Memory via Interpretation Bias:

Running head: INDIRECT EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON MEMORY 1. The Indirect Effect of Attention Bias on Memory via Interpretation Bias: Running head: INDIRECT EFFECT OF ATTENTION ON MEMORY 1 The Indirect Effect of Attention Bias on Memory via Interpretation Bias: Evidence for the Combined Cognitive Bias Hypothesis in Subclinical Depression.

More information

Masked Primes Can Be Genuinely Semantically Processed

Masked Primes Can Be Genuinely Semantically Processed Masked Primes Can Be Genuinely Semantically Processed A Picture Prime Study Eva Van den Bussche, Karolien Notebaert, and Bert Reynvoet Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium Abstract.

More information

Working Memory Load and Stroop Interference Effect

Working Memory Load and Stroop Interference Effect Working Memory Load and Stroop Interference Effect A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science in Psychology By Quan Ying Gao University of Canterbury

More information

Introduction to Computational Neuroscience

Introduction to Computational Neuroscience Introduction to Computational Neuroscience Lecture 11: Attention & Decision making Lesson Title 1 Introduction 2 Structure and Function of the NS 3 Windows to the Brain 4 Data analysis 5 Data analysis

More information

A double dissociation in masked emotional priming 1. Running head: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION IN MASKED EMOTIONAL PRIMING

A double dissociation in masked emotional priming 1. Running head: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION IN MASKED EMOTIONAL PRIMING A double dissociation in masked emotional priming 1 Running head: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION IN MASKED EMOTIONAL PRIMING Masked Emotional Priming: A Double Dissociation between Direct and Indirect Effects Reveals

More information

Emotional influences on perception and working memory

Emotional influences on perception and working memory COGNITION AND EMOTION, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1213703 BRIEF ARTICLE Emotional influences on perception and working memory Juyoen Hur a, Alexandru D. Iordan b, Florin Dolcos a,c,d

More information

Fear Selectively Modulates Visual Mental Imagery and Visual Perception

Fear Selectively Modulates Visual Mental Imagery and Visual Perception Fear Selectively Modulates Visual Mental Imagery and Visual Perception The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation

More information

Ideomotor Compatibility in the Psychological Refractory Period Effect: 29 Years of Oversimplification

Ideomotor Compatibility in the Psychological Refractory Period Effect: 29 Years of Oversimplification Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, Vol. 28, No. 2, 396 409 Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0096-1523/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.396

More information

The disengagement of attentive resources from task-irrelevant cues to sexual and emotional. infidelity

The disengagement of attentive resources from task-irrelevant cues to sexual and emotional. infidelity The disengagement of attentive resources from task-irrelevant cues to sexual and emotional infidelity Date: September 20, 2007 Word count: 4,664 Running head: Disengagement of attentive resources Disengagement

More information