CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Transcription

1 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CORRECTIONS ESSAY QUESTIONS READING LIST FOR THE FALL 2009 COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION Reading List for Question #1 Auerhahn, K. (2002). Selective incapacitation, three strikes, and the problem of aging prison populations: Using simulation modeling to see the future. Criminology and Public Policy, 1(3), Bjerk, D. (2005). Making the crime fit the penalty: The role of prosecutorial discretion under mandatory minimum sentencing. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), Chen, E.Y. (2008). Impacts of Three Strikes and You're Out on crime trends in California and throughout the United States. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(4), Chen, E.Y. (2008). The liberation hypothesis and racial and ethnic disparities in the application of California's Three Strikes Law. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6(2), Ehlers, S., Schiraldi, V., & Zeidenberg, J. (2004). Still striking out: Ten years of California's three strikes. Washington, D.C.: Justice Policy Institute. Ezell, M.E., & Cohen, L.E. (1997). Age, crime and crime control policies: A longitudinal analysis of youthful, serious, chronic offenders with implications for the "Three Strikes" legislation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 6(2), Harris, J.C., & Jesilow, P. (2000). It's not the old ball game: Three strikes and the courtroom workgroup. Justice Quarterly, 17(1), Johnson, J. L., & Saint-Germain, M.A. (2005). Officer down: Implications of three-strikes for public safety. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16(4), Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Three strikes and you're out: Exploring symbol and substance in American and British crime control politics. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5),

2 Kovandzic, T., Sloan, J.J. III, & Vieraitis, L.M. (2002). Unintended consequences of politically popular sentencing policy: The homicide promoting effects of "three strikes" in US cities Criminology and Public Policy, 1(3), Kovandzic, T., Sloan, J.J. III, & Vieraitis, L.M. (2004). "Striking out" as crime reduction policy: The impact of "Three strikes" laws on crime rates in U.S. cities. Justice Quarterly, 21(2), Legislative Analyst's Office of California. (2005). A primer. Three strikes: The impact after more than a decade. San Francisco, CA: Author. Marvell, T.B., & Moody, C.E. (2001). The lethal effects of three-strikes laws. Journal of Legal Studies, 30, Ramirez, J.R., & Crano, W.D. (2003). Deterrence and incapacitation: An interrupted timeseries analysis of California's three-strikes law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), Worrall, J.L. (2004). The effect of three-strikes legislation on serious crime in California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), Reading List for Question #2 Adler, F. (1975). Sisters in crime: The rise of the new female criminal. New York: McGraw Hill. Deakin, J., & Spencer, J. (2003). Women behind bars: Explanations and implications. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), Gover, A.R., Pérez, D.M., & Jennings, W.G. (2008). Gender differences in factors contributing to institutional misconduct. The Prison Journal, 88(3), Green, B.L., Miranda, J., & Daroowalla, A. (2005). Trauma exposure, mental health functioning, and program needs of women in jail. Crime & Delinquency, 51(1), Mooney, J.L., Minor, K.I., & Wells, J.B. (2008). The relationship of stress, impulsivity, and beliefs to drug use severity in a sample of women prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(6), Jiang, S., & Winfree, L.T. (2006). Social support, gender, and inmate adjustment to prison life: Insights from a national sample. The Prison Journal, 86(1), Krabill, J.J., & Aday, R H. (2007). Exploring the social world of aging female prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 17(1),

3 Kuhlmann, A. (2005). The view from the other side of the fence: Incarcerated women talk about themselves. Justice Policy Journal: Analyzing Criminal and Juvenile Justice Issues and Policies, 2(1), Loper, A.B. (2006). How do mothers in prison differ from non-mothers? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15(1), Pollock, J.M., Mullings, J.L., & Crouch, B.M. (2006). Violent women: Findings from the Texas Women Inmates Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(4), Raj, A., Rose, J., & Decker, M.R. (2008). Prevalence and patterns of sexual assault across the life span among incarcerated women. Violence Against Women, 14(5), Shearer, R.A. (2003). Identifying the special needs of female offenders. Federal Probation, 67(1), Schram, P.J., Koons-Witt, B.A., & Morash, M. (2004). Management strategies when working with female prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(3), Severance, T.A. (2005). You know who you can go to: Cooperation and exchange between incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 85(3), Sokoloff, N.J. (2005). Women prisoners at the dawn of the 21st century. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(1/2), Thompson, C., & Loper, A.B. (2005). Adjustment patterns in incarcerated women: An analysis of differences based on sentence length. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 32(6), Vuolo, M., & Kruttschnitt, C. (2008). Prisoners' adjustment, correctional officers, and context: The foreground and background of punishment in late modernity. Law & Society Review, 42(2), Vuolo, M., & Kruttschnitt, C. (2008). The cultural context of women prisoners' mental health: A comparison of two prison systems. Punishment & Society, 9(2), Reading List for Question #3 Benda, B.B. (2005). Introduction: Boot camps revisited: Issues, problems, prospects. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(3/4), Benda, B.B., Toombs, N., & Peacock, M. (2006). Distinguishing graduates from dropouts and dismissals: Who fails boot camp? Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1),

4 Bottcher, J., & Ezell, M.E. (2005). Examining the effectiveness of boot camps: A randomized experiment with a long-term follow up. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 42(3), Brunet, J.R. (2002). Day reporting centers in North Carolina: Implementation lessons for policymakers. Justice System Journal, 23(2), Burrell, W.D., & Gable, R.S. (2008). From B.F. Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart: The past, present and future of electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3/4), Cotter, R., & Lint, W.D. (2009). GPS-electronic monitoring and contemporary penology: a case study of U.S. GPA-electronic monitoring programmes. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(1), Cullen, F.T., Blevins, K.R., & Trager, J.S. (2005). The rise and fall of boot camp: A case study in common-sense corrections. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(3/4), DeMichele, M., Payne, B.K., & Button, D.M. (2008). Electronic monitoring of sex offenders: Identifying unanticipated consequences and implications. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3/4), Duwe, G., & Kerschner, D. (2008). Removing a nail from the boot camp coffin: An outcome evaluation of Minnesota's Challenge Incarceration Program. Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), Finn, M.A., & Muirhead-Steves, S. (2002). The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), Jannetta, J. (2006). GPS monitoring of high-risk sex offenders. Irvine, CA: UC-Irvine Center for Evidence-Based Corrections. Available from Kurlychek, M., & Kempinen, C. (2006). Beyond boot camp: The impact of aftercare on offender reentry. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(2), Lutze, F., & Bell, C. (2005). Boot camp prisons as masculine organizations: Rethinking recidivism and program design. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, MacKenzie, D.L., Bierie, D., & Mitchell, O. (2007). An experimental study of a therapeutic boot camp: Impact on impulses, attitudes and recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), MacKenzie, D.L., & Souryal, C. (1995). Inmates attitude change during incarceration: A comparison of boot camp with traditional prison. Justice Quarterly, 12,

5 Mair, G., Padgett, K.G., & Bales, W.D. (2006). Electronic monitoring, effectiveness, and public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(1), McNall, L.A., & Roch, S.G. (2007). Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), May, D.C., & Wood, P.B. (2005). What influences offenders' willingness to serve alternative sanctions? The Prison Journal, 85(2), Padgett, K.G., Bales, W.D., & Blomberg, T.G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(1), Payne, B.K., & Gainey, R.R. (2004). The electronic monitoring of offenders released from jail or prison: Safety, control, and comparisons to the incarceration experience. The Prison Journal, 84(4), Ulmer, J.T. (2001). Intermediate sanctions: A comparative analysis of the probability and severity of recidivism. Sociological Inquiry, 71(2),