Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey
|
|
- Kathryn Gallagher
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Behavioural Brain Research 117 (2000) Research report Hand kinematics during reaching and grasping in the macaque monkey Alice C. Roy, Yves Paulignan, Alessandro Farnè 1, Christophe Jouffrais 2, Driss Boussaoud * Institut des Sciences Cogniti es, CNRS UPR 9075, 67 bd Pinel, Bron, Cedex, France Received 15 February 2000; received in revised form 5 July 2000; accepted 5 July 2000 Abstract In this paper, we develop an animal model of prehension movements by examining the kinematics of reaching and grasping in monkeys and by comparing the results to published data on humans. Hand movements were recorded in three dimensions in monkeys who were trained to either point at visual targets under unperturbed and perturbed conditions, or to reach and grasp 3-D objects. The results revealed the following three similarities in the hand kinematics of monkey and man. (1) Pointing movements showed an asymmetry depending on target location relative to the hand used; in particular, movements to an ipsilateral target took longer than those to a contralateral one. (2) Perturbation of target location decreased the magnitude of the velocity peak and increased the duration of pointing movements. (3) Reaching to grasp movements displayed a bell-shaped wrist velocity profile and the maximum grip aperture was correlated with object size. These similarities indicate that the macaque monkey can be a useful model for understanding human motor control Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Pointing; Prehension; Psychophysics; Motor control; Monkey 1. Introduction * Corresponding author. Tel.: ; fax: address: boussaoud@isc.cnrs.fr (D. Boussaoud). 1 Present address: Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 2 Present address: Department of Physiology, University of Fribourg, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland. A large number of experiments have investigated motor control in normal human beings and have provided a detailed psychophysical characterisation of both pointing and prehension movements. In pointing experiments, previous studies sought to determine whether fast arm movements could be corrected in an ongoing fashion, or whether they were ballistic. It is now established that pointing movements can be redirected to a second target, e.g. by presenting a new target 100 ms after the first one [21] and that this reorganisation generally occurs 200 ms after movement onset [13,17]. Human prehension movements were first characterised by Jeannerod [8], who distinguished two psychophysical components: a reaching component that transports the hand to the vicinity of the object and a grasping component that specifies the hand configuration to ensure accurate prehension. The reaching component is characterised by the wrist velocity, which typically displays a single peak at 40% of movement time. The grasping component is defined by the grip size, i.e. the distance between the thumb and the index finger, a parameter that is tightly correlated with the size of the object to be grasped. These findings have been confirmed by several subsequent studies [11,12,23]. In sharp contrast with the wealth of psychophysical data in humans, very little is known about the kinematic characteristics of pointing and prehension movements in non-human primates. Only a few experiments have been conducted on monkeys and they involved either the use of a manipulandum to reach the target /00/$ - see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S (00)
2 76 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) and were thus constrained in two dimensions [6,16], or they used kinematic recordings with poor temporal resolution (30 Hz) [5]. We carried out a series of experiments to examine the kinematics of unconstrained reaching and grasping movements in the monkey using high resolution measures (300 Hz). In this work, we present findings from exploratory experiments, one involving pointing and the other prehension. In the pointing experiment, targets were white circles presented on a touch screen, whereas in the prehension experiment, 3-D cylindrical objects of two different sizes were used. We examined the kinematics of normal movements, the on-line reorganisation of movement after a perturbation of a target location (pointing task), as well as the effect of object size on grasping movement (prehension task). 2. Behavioural tasks Two macaque monkeys (4.5 and 7 kg) were used in this study. Surgical and testing procedures, as well as animal care, were in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. In the pointing experiment, a male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) seated in a primate chair and with its head fixed, was placed in front of a resistive touch screen (36 27cm) inclined at a 50 angle relative to the horizontal plane (Fig. 1A). A semi-reflective mirror was positioned above the touch screen so that targets projected onto the mirror (from a computer monitor suspended above the touch screen) appeared to the Fig. 1. Schematic drawings of the experimental setups. (A) Pointing task. The animal first placed its hand on the starting point (1) located at the bottom of the touch screen. Then, a target (2) was presented at the top of the screen. Both the starting point and the targets were virtual images (white circles) presented via a computer monitor and a mirror. When the target dimmed, the animal had to touch it in order to receive a reward. (B) Prehension task. The animal placed its hand on a home pad located in front of its chest. One of two grey cylinders (1.5 or 2.5 cm diameter) was presented on a tray fitted onto the primate chair. When the white base of the cylinder was illuminated, the animal had to grasp and lift the cylinder to obtain a reward. monkey as if they were on the touch screen. The monkey started a trial by putting its left hand on a starting point (home pad) located at the bottom of the touch screen. A single target was presented for ms; it then dimmed and the monkey had 500 ms to reach for and touch the image in order to receive a liquid reward. Both the home pad and the targets were white circles occupying 2 and 1.25 of visual angle, respectively. The targets were placed 20 cm from the animal s chest. Each daily session included two separate blocks presented in pseudo-random order across days. In the normal block, the target appeared at one of three locations (centre, left, right), separated by 3 of visual angle where each was equidistant (18 ) from the starting position. In the perturbed block, the target always appeared at the central location, but as soon as the monkey s hand left the home pad, the target either remained at the central location (80% of the trials; control condition), shifted randomly to the left (10%; leftward perturbation) or shifted randomly to the right (10%; rightward perturbation). In perturbed trials, the monkey was required to point to the new location of the target. Within each block, the different types of trials were presented pseudo-randomly. In the prehension experiment, a cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) was trained to reach for and grasp cylinders placed on a tray fitted onto the primate chair (Fig. 1B). Objects were mounted on a flat base that could be illuminated. Typically, a trial began when the monkey put its right hand on a home pad located immediately in front of its chest along the sagittal axis. After a delay of 500 ms, the object s base was illuminated and the monkey had to reach and lift the object to receive a reward. Objects were displayed straight in front of the animal s body axis, at a distance of 20 cm from the hand starting position. In each daily session, two objects, a large one (2.5 cm diameter) and a small one (1.5 cm diameter) were presented in two separate blocks of trials presented in reverse order from one day to the other. The right arm and the head of the monkey were free to move, whereas the left arm was gently attached to the chair. In both experiments, extensive behavioural training was carried out before the kinematic recordings were initiated, so that the animals performed with nearly perfect accuracy during recording sessions Mo ement recordings In both experiments, hand movements were recorded by means of an Optotrak 3020 (Northern Digital Inc.). The spatial positions of the markers (infrared emitting diodes) were sampled at 300 Hz with a spatial resolution of 0.1 mm. As the monkey used the whole hand to point to the targets, a single marker was taped on the junction between the third and fourth fingers in order
3 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) Table 1 Pointing task a Left (ipsilateral) Centre Right (contralateral) Normal Movement time (ms) Latency 1st VP (ms) Latency 2nd VP (ms) Amplitude of 1st VP (mm/s) Latency of deceleration peak (ms) Perturbed Movement time (ms) Amplitude of 1st VP (mm/s) Amplitude of deceleration peak (mm/s 2 ) Amplitude of re-acceleration peak (mm/s 2 ) b c d d d e d d d a Values (means S.E.M.) of the main kinematic parameters under normal and perturbed conditions. VP, velocity peak. b Significantly greater than centre and right. c Significantly greater than right. d Significantly different from centre and left. e Significantly shorter than left and right. to characterise the transport of the hand. In the prehension task, one marker was taped on the nail of the index finger, another on the thumb. These markers were used to measure grip aperture as a function of time. In addition, a third marker placed on the wrist allowed us to characterise the reaching component of movement. For each trial, recording started with target onset (pointing task) or object illumination (prehension task) and ended when the target was contacted or the object lifted Data analysis A second-order Butterworth dual pass filter (cutoff frequency, 10 Hz) was used for raw data processing. Data were then analysed using Optodisp software, developed in the laboratory. In the pointing experiment, the movement time, as well as the latency and amplitude of the velocity and deceleration peaks, were measured for each individual movement in both the normal and perturbed blocks. For the perturbed blocks, we further measured the latency and amplitude of the re-acceleration peak and the time to the change of movement direction; these measures allowed us to determine the time of the earliest movement reorganisation in response to perturbation. In the prehension experiment, the movement time as well as the latency and amplitude of both the wrist velocity peak and maximum grip aperture were measured for each individual movement. After each trial was recorded, movement time was determined on the basis of the velocity profile. We determined movement onset by noting the first of seven consecutive measures of increasing amplitudes. Likewise, we determined end of movement with the same technique but by starting at the end and moving towards the beginning. Peak latencies were defined as the time elapsed between movement onset and each peak. The values obtained over each daily session were averaged for each parameter and each testing condition. These averages were then analysed using one-way analyses of variance with repeated measures. For the pointing experiment, the normal and perturbed blocks were analysed separately to determine the effect of target location and shift of position, respectively; posthoc comparisons (significance level: P 0.05) were performed using the Newman Keuls test. For the prehension experiment, movements to the large and small cylinders were compared to determine the effect of object size. 3. Pointing task under normal conditions Analysis of the normal blocks recorded over four daily sessions (45 50 movements per block, i.e. 15 for each location) yielded several significant differences (Table 1). First, movement time varied with target position (F(2,6) =19, P=0.002). The post-hoc analysis indicated that movements to the target ipsilateral to the hand used (left) took significantly longer than movements to the central (P=0.006) or contralateral (P= 0.002) targets. Movement times, when comparing central versus right targets, were not significantly different. The second finding was the presence of two velocity peaks which occurred in the majority of trials, at different times depending on target location (Fig. 2). Target position had a significant influence on the latency of both peaks (first peak: (F(2,6) =7.5, P=0.023; second peak: F(2,6) =26, P=0.001). Interestingly, consistent with the differences in movement time described above,
4 78 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) the first velocity peak occurred significantly later for movements to the left than for movements to the right (P=0.019). Similarly, the second peak occurred earlier for movements to the right target than for movements to the left (P=0.001) or central targets (P=0.003), respectively. The time to peak deceleration varied significantly with target position (F(2,6) =21, P=0.001). This peak occurred earlier for movements to the right than for movements to the central (P=0.006) or left targets (P=0.001). Finally, we found an effect of target position on the amplitude of the first velocity peak (F(2,6) =26.97, P=0.001). Movements to the right had a greater amplitude, thus differing once again from movements to both the left and central targets (P=0.001) Pointing task: effect of perturbation The perturbed blocks recorded over four daily sessions ( movements per block, including 52 movements re-directed to the left and 35 re-directed to the right) were analysed (Table 1). Movement time was significantly affected by perturbation, in that movement time in perturbed trials was on average 91 ms longer than in unperturbed movements to the central target (control condition) (F(2,6) =14.24, P=0.005). Furthermore, it is interesting to note that re-directed movements to the left took, on average, 55 ms longer than those re-directed to the right (P=0.047). Observation of the animal s behaviour shows that indeed, the monkey performed more easily on perturbations to the right than to the left and made less errors on such trials despite several months of training. Perturbation affected the amplitudes of the first velocity peak (F(2,6) =23.07, P=0.001), the deceleration peak (F(2,6) =6.0, P=0.037) and the re-acceleration peak (F(2,6) =68.33, P=0.001). The post-hoc analysis revealed an asymmetry between movements performed to the right target and those performed to the central or left targets, the latter movements presenting the highest amplitudes (P 0.05). By contrast, perturbations of target location did not affect the latencies of these parameters. Finally, the time necessary to correct movement direction depended on whether the target position was shifted to the left or to the right (F(1,3)=31.59, P=0.011). Consistent with movement times, correction of the trajectory to the right occurred earlier (180 ms) than to the left (260 ms; Fig. 3). 4. Prehension task Fig. 2. Normal pointing movements. (A) Representative examples of spatial trajectories of individual movements directed to the central (solid line), left (dotted line), or right (dashed line) target. The circles indicate the approximate location of the starting point (bottom) and targets (top); the starting point and central target were aligned with the animal s body axis. The X-Y-Z axes represent the monkey s view, i.e. 50 from the horizontal plane. (B) Velocity profiles of the three movements shown in (A) (same conventions). Note that each movement presented two velocity peaks (see (A) for the average position of these peaks relative to the hand path). A total of 270 movements recorded over three sessions ( 50 movements for each object size per session) were analysed. One primary observation is that total movement time is affected by object size (F(1,2) =29.31, P=0.032) (Fig. 4), in that reaching to grasp a small object took longer (mean S.E.M.: ms) than reaching to grasp a larger object ( ms). The reaching component was characterised by a bellshaped wrist velocity profile with a single peak. The latency of this peak did not differ significantly with object size, corresponding to 51% of movement time for the small object and 54% of movement time for the large object. Object size did not influence the amplitude of the velocity peak either. The grasping component was characterised by the profile of the maximum grip aperture, which generally occurred at 73 76% of movement time. The amplitude of the maximum grip aperture was affected by object size (F(1,2) =25.37, P=0.037), but its latency remained constant. On average, the monkey grasped the small object (1.5 cm diameter) with a maximum grip aperture of cm and the large object (2.5 cm diameter) with a maximum grip aperture of cm (Fig. 4).
5 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) Pointing mo ements: elocity profile Fig. 3. Perturbed pointing movements. (A) Representative examples of spatial trajectories for normal and re-directed movements in the pointing task. The lines show the hand path for one control movement (solid line), one movement re-directed to the left (dotted line) and one movement re-directed to the right (dashed line). The arrows point to the changes in movement direction in response to perturbation of target location. (B) Velocity profiles of the three movements shown in (A) (same conventions). Movement redirected to the right target displays the lower peak amplitude. 5. Relation to previous studies The goal of the present study was to determine the kinematics of unconstrained goal-directed movements in non-human primates. These results are particularly useful because they are directly comparable to human data reported in the literature. There are three important similarities between the two species. First, we found an asymmetric pattern in pointing to ipsilateral versus contralateral targets relative to the hand used. Second, perturbations of target location induce fast reorganisation of pointing movements. Third, in the prehension task, we found that the temporal pattern of reaching and grasping is similar across species and that there is a correlation between object size and grip aperture. The only discrepancy between the monkey and human data is that non-human primates reveal a double, instead of a single, velocity peak in the pointing task. In humans, Prablanc and Martin reported a single velocity peak for unconstrained, unperturbed pointing movements performed within a horizontal plane [13]. In the monkey, Georgopoulos et al. [6], studying constrained movements (displacements of a manipulandum on a horizontal plane), reported a single velocity peak for normal movements, but a double peak for re-directed movements. In contrast, we found double velocity peaks not only for re-directed movements, but also for normal ones. It is therefore possible that the animal in our experiment was systematically preparing a movement reorganisation. This possibility seems unlikely, however, since we observed double peaks in the normal blocks, even for eccentric (right and left) target locations that were never perturbed. Alternatively, the absence of a constraint and the angled plane might have led to very curved pointing movements and thus, to a decrease in movement speed at the point of highest curvature. In favour of this explanation are data in humans [2] showing that unconstrained hand movements present higher degrees of curvature than movements restricted by either a hand-held cursor or instruction to follow a straight-line path. Regardless of one s explanation, the discrepancy between the velocity profile reported here in the monkey and that described earlier in man probably reflects variations of experimental conditions rather than an inter-species difference Pointing mo ements: asymmetric response to perturbation Perturbation of target location has similar effects in monkey and man. In humans [13], the earliest signs of movement reorganisation in contralateral perturbation occur, on average, 167 ms after movement onset (movement time: 490 ms). In the monkey, these signs were observed 120 ms after movement onset (movement time: 360 ms). As for ipsilateral perturbation, movement reorganisation occurs later, both in humans (331 ms after movement onset) [13] and in monkeys (260 ms) and coincides with the change in movement direction (visible on the spatial path). For both species, movement time is longer in trials perturbed to the ipsilateral side than in those perturbed to the contralateral side ([13] and present study). In summary, a clear asymmetry between pointing to ipsilateral versus contralateral targets is common to both humans and monkeys, possibly reflecting bio-mechanical constraints. Both species point more rapidly to contralateral targets and movement reorganisation in response to a contralateral perturbation is faster than to an ipsilateral perturbation.
6 80 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) Prehension mo ements: influence of object size In humans, movement time ranges from 550 to 650 ms for a movement amplitude of 30 cm and an object size of 1.5 cm [12]. Here, we found that the monkey covers a shorter distance of 20 cm with 100 ms. This implies that the mean velocity of reach to grasp movement is almost equivalent in humans and monkeys ( 46 and 39 cm/s, respectively). We found that total movement time depended on object size, in that it was longer for the small object than for the larger one. A similar finding has been reported in human subjects [11,23]. As stated in these earlier studies, the smaller the object, the more precise the movement needs to be to ensure an accurate grip on the object. In other words, precision demands that, to be precise, one needs to reduce movement variability by reducing the mean velocity [15], this leads to an increase in movement time. Accuracy appears to be achieved in the same way by both humans and monkeys. The reaching component of prehension movements is characterised by a single wrist velocity peak in the two primate species. This peak is observed at 40% of movement time in humans [9] and at 50% of movement time in monkeys (Fig. 5). Another strong similarity between man and monkey kinematics arises from the grasping component. The monkey s grip size varied in accordance with object size, thus replicating a well-established aspect of human kinematics [8,9,21 23]. Furthermore, the relationship between grip aperture and object size is comparable. In the macaque monkey, a difference of 1 cm in object size leads to a difference of 0.61 cm in grip aperture. In human subjects, the same difference in object size leads to a difference of 0.77 cm [11]. 6. Conclusion and perspectives The present study used a high-resolution technique to characterise hand kinematics in monkeys. The results indicate that, except for a difference in the pointing velocity profile, monkey and human movements share striking kinesiological similarities. Monkey movements, therefore, can serve as a valuable model for investigating human motor functions. In this regard, the present study is a first step towards exploring the neural bases of different types of movements, or of different components of the same movement. In particular, it is known that primate visuomotor processes depend primarily on a neural stream linking the occipital and the parietal lobe [7]. It has been proposed that this pathway comprise at least two separate networks that might underlie the reaching and grasping components of prehension movements, respectively. One pathway links the anterior intraparietal area (AIP) with the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) [14,18], another links the superior parietal lobule with the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) [10,19,20]. Recent studies have shown that inactivation of AIP or PMv lead to deficits in grasping [3,4], whereas inactivation of portions of the superior parietal lobule (areas V6/V6A) lead to deficits in visuospatial processing and reaching [1]. Future studies should provide a more detailed analysis of these deficits by combining inactivation experiments with kinematic recording of hand and arm movements. Acknowledgements We thank Dr Martine Meunier and Dr Ira Noveck for their helpful comments on the manuscript and Fig. 4. Prehension movements: effect of object size on movement time and grip size. (A) Time plots of wrist velocity and grip aperture for a representative movement directed to the small object (1.5 cm). (B) Same parameters for a representative movement directed to the large object (2.5 cm). Note that the maximum grip aperture was bigger for the large object. The amplitude of the velocity peak was unaffected by object size.
7 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) Fig. 5. Comparison of the kinematics of reaching and grasping in monkey and man: grip size and wrist velocity in a macaque monkey (A) and a human subject ((B) from Paulignan et al. (1991), see Ref. [12]). In both species, the reaching component is characterised by a single wrist velocity peak and the grasping component by a grip size that increases up to a maximum and then decreases towards the end of movement. The object diameter was 15 mm in both experiments. Conventions as in Fig. 4. Jean-Luc Charieau and Marie-line Loyalle for expert animal care and surgical assistance. References [1] Battaglini PP, Muzur A, Galletti C, Fattori P, Daprati E, Brovelli A. V6 complex probably supports very specific components of prehension bevavior: a lesion study in monkeys, Eur. Brain Behav. Soc. 1999;1:65 (Abstract). [2] Desmurget M, Jordan M, Prablanc C, Jeannerod M, Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies, Am Physiol Soc 1997;77(3): [3] Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Luppino G, Murata A. A parietal-frontal circuit for hand grasping movements in the monkey: evidence from reversible inactivation experiments. In: Thiers P, Karnath H-O, editors. Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1997: [4] Gallese V, Murata A, Kaseda M, Niki N, Sakata H. Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. NeuroReport 1994;5: [5] Gardner ER, Ro JY, Debowy D, Ghosh S. Facilitation of neuronal activity in somatosensory and posterior parietal cortex during prehension. Exp Brain Res 1999;127: [6] Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT. Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 1981;46: [7] Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. TINS 1992;15:20 5. [8] Jeannerod M. Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A, editors. Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981: [9] Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 1984;16: [10] Johnson PB, Ferraina S. Cortical networks for visual reaching: intrinsic frontal lobe connectivity. Eur J Neurosci 1996;8: [11] Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S. Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 1990;9: [12] Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. Effects of changing object size. Exp Brain Res 1991;87: [13] Prablanc C, Martin O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 1992;67(2): [14] Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb Cortex 1995;5: [15] Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Frank JS. Sources of inaccuracy in rapid movement. In: Stelmach GE, editor. Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1979: [16] Scott SH, Kalaska JF, Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex, J Neurophysiol 1997;77(2): [17] Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F. Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 1983;49: [18] Taira M, Mine S, Georgopoulos AP, Murata A, Sakata H. Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movements. Exp Brain Res 1990;83: [19] Tanné J, Boussaoud D, Boyer-Zeller N, Moret V, Rouiller EM, Parietal inputs to dorsal vs.ventral premotor areas in the macaque monkey: a multiple anatomical tracing study, Soc Neurosci 1996;22(2):1084 (Abstracts). [20] Tanné J, Boussaoud D, Boyer-Zeller N, Rouiller EM. Direct visual pathways for reaching movements in the macaque monkey. NeuroReport 1995;7: [21] Van Sonderen JF, Gielen CCAM, Denier Van der Gon JJ. Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continu-
8 82 A.C. Roy et al. / Beha ioural Brain Research 117 (2000) ously adjusted according to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 1989;78: [22] Wallace SA, Weeks DL. Temporal constraints in the control of prehensive movements. J Mot Behav 1988;20: [23] Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 1986;18:
Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk
Exp Brain Res (1998) 123:346±350 Springer-Verlag 1998 RESEARCH NOTE Jinsung Wang George E. Stelmach Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk Received: 1 April
More informationMulti-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events
Exp Brain Res (1997) 117:148±152 Springer-Verlag 1997 RESEARCH NOTE E.M. Robertson R.C. Miall Multi-joint limbs permit a flexible response to unpredictable events Received: 24 March 1997 / Accepted: 7
More informationInterlimb Transfer of Grasp Orientation is Asymmetrical
Short Communication TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2006) 6, 1805 1809 ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2006.291 Interlimb Transfer of Grasp Orientation is Asymmetrical V. Frak 1,2, *, D. Bourbonnais 2, I. Croteau
More information7 Grip aperture and target shape
7 Grip aperture and target shape Based on: Verheij R, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ. The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements. Exp Brain Res, In revision 103 Introduction
More informationVisual and motor constraints on trajectory planning in pointing movements
Neuroscience Letters 372 (2004) 235 239 Visual and motor constraints on trajectory planning in pointing movements R. Palluel-Germain a,f.boy a, J.P. Orliaguet a,, Y. Coello b a Laboratoire de Psychologie
More informationVisuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension
Human Movement Science 18 (1999) 201±218 www.elsevier.nl/locate/humov Visuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension M. Jeannerod * Institut des Sciences Cognitives, 67 Boulvard Pinel,
More informationHuman Paleoneurology and the Evolution of the Parietal Cortex
PARIETAL LOBE The Parietal Lobes develop at about the age of 5 years. They function to give the individual perspective and to help them understand space, touch, and volume. The location of the parietal
More informationThe role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension
Exp Brain Res (1999) 125:281 286 Springer-Verlag 1999 RESEARCH ARTICLE J.D. Connolly M.A. Goodale The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension Received: 3 July 1998
More informationW ith automatic correction mechanism, humans can quickly and involuntarily correct ongoing hand
OPEN SUBJECT AREAS: PERCEPTION MOTION DETECTION MOTOR CONTROL Received 27 March 2014 Accepted 24 November 2014 Published 11 December 2014 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to
More informationPeripheral facial paralysis (right side). The patient is asked to close her eyes and to retract their mouth (From Heimer) Hemiplegia of the left side. Note the characteristic position of the arm with
More informationThe influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object
Supplemental materials for: The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object David Whitney*, David A. Westwood, & Melvyn A. Goodale* *Group on Action and Perception, The
More informationA test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension
Exp Brain Res (2000) 134:268 273 DOI 10.1007/s002210000479 RESEARCH NOTE M. Mon-Williams R.D. McIntosh A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension Received: 28
More informationModest Gaze-Related Discharge Modulation in Monkey Dorsal Premotor Cortex During a Reaching Task Performed With Free Fixation
J Neurophysiol 88: 1064 1072, 2002; 10.1152/jn.09951.2001. RAPID COMMUNICATION Modest Gaze-Related Discharge Modulation in Monkey Dorsal Premotor Cortex During a Reaching Task Performed With Free Fixation
More informationPlanning movements well in advance
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 25 (7 8), 985 995 Planning movements well in advance Constanze Hesse University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany Denise D. J. de Grave Human Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit
More informationSelective bias in temporal bisection task by number exposition
Selective bias in temporal bisection task by number exposition Carmelo M. Vicario¹ ¹ Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università Roma la Sapienza, via dei Marsi 78, Roma, Italy Key words: number- time- spatial
More informationMotor Systems I Cortex. Reading: BCP Chapter 14
Motor Systems I Cortex Reading: BCP Chapter 14 Principles of Sensorimotor Function Hierarchical Organization association cortex at the highest level, muscles at the lowest signals flow between levels over
More informationPSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. Research Article
Research Article GRASPING VISUAL ILLUSIONS: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action V.H. Franz, 1 K.R. Gegenfurtner, 1 H.H. Bülthoff, 1 and M. Fahle 2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische
More informationUniversity of Groningen. Getting a grip on grasping Kamp, Cornelis van de
University of Groningen Getting a grip on grasping Kamp, Cornelis van de IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the
More informationFast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced
Exp Brain Res (11) 1:53 6 DOI 1.17/s1-11-83- RESEARCH ARTICLE Fast and fine-tuned corrections when the target of a hand movement is displaced Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes Eli Brenner Jeroen B. J. Smeets Received:
More informationSupplemental material
Supplemental material Research Article Title: The dorsomedial pathway is not just for reaching: Grasping neurons in the medial parieto-occipital cortex of the macaque monkey Abbreviated title: Authors:
More informationPsychological Research
Psychol Res (1984) 46:121-127 Psychological Research Springer-Verlag 1984 Research note: Peak velocity timing invariance Alan M. Wing I and Ed Miller 2 1 Medical Research Council Applied Psychology Unit,
More informationREACH-TO-GRASP OF OBJECTS is a key feature of normal
1325 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Coordination Between Reaching and Grasping in Patients With Hemiparesis and Healthy Subjects Paulette M. van Vliet, PhD, Martin R. Sheridan, PhD ABSTRACT. van Vliet PM, Sheridan MR.
More informationChapter 3: 2 visual systems
Chapter 3: 2 visual systems Overview Explain the significance of the turn to the brain in cognitive science Explain Mishkin and Ungerleider s hypothesis that there are two distinct visual systems Outline
More informationVision and precision reaching in 15-month-old infants
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Infant Behavior & Development 31 (2008) 62 70 Vision and precision reaching in 15-month-old infants Renee L. Carrico a,, Neil E. Berthier b a Saint Michael s College,
More informationUpper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback
Exp Brain Res (2006) 168: 307 311 DOI 10.1007/s00221-005-0280-y RESEARCH NOTE Daniel J. Goble Æ Colleen A. Lewis Æ Susan H. Brown Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback Received:
More informationFractionation of the visuomotor feedback response to directions of movement and perturbation
J Neurophysiol : 8 33,. First published August, ; doi:.5/jn.377.3. Fractionation of the visuomotor feedback response to directions of movement and perturbation David W. Franklin, Sae Franklin, and Daniel
More informationTopic 11 - Parietal Association Cortex. 1. Sensory-to-motor transformations. 2. Activity in parietal association cortex and the effects of damage
Topic 11 - Parietal Association Cortex 1. Sensory-to-motor transformations 2. Activity in parietal association cortex and the effects of damage Sensory to Motor Transformation Sensory information (visual,
More informationBehavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 284 (2015) 167 178 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Brain Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbr Research report How coordinate and categorical
More informationARTICLE IN PRESS. Neuropsychologia xxx (2009) xxx xxx. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia xxx (2009) xxx xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neuropsychologia journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuropsychologia Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action
More informationDifferent action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour q
Cognition 102 (2007) 415 433 www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour q Ioanna Georgiou a, Cristina Becchio b, Scott Glover a, Umberto Castiello
More informationConscious control of movements: increase of temporal precision in voluntarily delayed actions
Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2001, 61: 175-179 Conscious control of movements: increase of temporal precision in voluntarily delayed actions El bieta Szel¹g 1, Krystyna Rymarczyk 1 and Ernst Pöppel 2 1 Department
More informationThree-dimensional tuning profile of motor cortical activity during arm. [Running Head] motor cortical activity during arm movements
[Title] Three-dimensional tuning profile of motor cortical activity during arm movements [Running Head] motor cortical activity during arm movements [Authors] Takashi Mitsuda (1) Corresponding Author Paolo
More informationThe Dorsomedial Pathway Is Not Just for Reaching: Grasping Neurons in the Medial Parieto-Occipital Cortex of the Macaque Monkey
342 The Journal of Neuroscience, January 6, 2010 30(1):342 349 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive The Dorsomedial Pathway Is Not Just for Reaching: Grasping Neurons in the Medial Parieto-Occipital Cortex of
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
doi:10.1038/nature14066 Supplementary discussion Gradual accumulation of evidence for or against different choices has been implicated in many types of decision-making, including value-based decisions
More informationNIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Neurophysiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 12.
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 2007 February ; 97(2): 1656 1670. doi:10.1152/jn.01031.2006. Neurophysiology of Prehension. II. Response Diversity
More informationThe Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Mediates Grasp Execution, Independent of Requirement to Update: New Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
8176 The Journal of Neuroscience, August 2, 2006 26(31):8176 8182 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive The Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Mediates Grasp Execution, Independent of Requirement to Update: New Insights
More informationLateral view of human brain! Cortical processing of touch!
Lateral view of human brain! Cortical processing of touch! How do we perceive objects held in the hand?! Touch receptors deconstruct objects to detect local features! Information is transmitted in parallel
More informationSimulation Modifies Prehension: Evidence for a Conjoined Representation of the Graspable Features of an Object and the Action of Grasping It
Simulation Modifies Prehension: Evidence for a Conjoined Representation of the Graspable Features of an Object and the Action of Grasping It Victor Frak 1,2 *, Isabelle Croteau 2, Daniel Bourbonnais 2,
More informationand the surrounding annuli. Effects on grasp scaling be-
Brief Communication 177 The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: Nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp Angela M. Haffenden, Karen C. Schiff and Melvyn A. Goodale
More informationParietofrontal Circuits for Action and Space Perception in the Macaque Monkey
NeuroImage 14, S27 S32 (2001) doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0835, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Parietofrontal Circuits for Action and Space Perception in the Macaque Monkey Massimo Matelli
More informationSpecificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 4, 8 8(5):465 475 465 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Specificity of Reflex Adaptation for Task-Relevant Variability David W. Franklin and Daniel M. Wolpert Computational
More informationOnline Control of Hand Trajectory and Evolution of Motor Intention in the Parietofrontal System
742 The Journal of Neuroscience, January 12, 2011 31(2):742 752 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Online Control of Hand Trajectory and Evolution of Motor Intention in the Parietofrontal System Philippe S.
More informationNatural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed
Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 288 294 Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed Geoffrey Bingham a, Rachel Coats b, Mark Mon-Williams b, a Department of Psychology,
More informationThe perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane
Exp Brain Res (1998) 118:408±414 Springer-Verlag 1998 RESEARCH NOTE H. Chris Dijkerman A. David Milner The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane II. Dissociated orientation functions
More informationAttentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes
Exp Brain Res (1998) 123:289 297 Springer-Verlag 1998 RESEARCH ARTICLE Umberto Castiello Attentional coding for three-dimensional objects and two-dimensional shapes Differential interference effects Received:
More informationMirror neurons. Romana Umrianova
Mirror neurons Romana Umrianova The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations Giacomo Rizzolatti and Corrado Sinigaglia Mechanism that unifies action
More informationThe path of visual attention
Acta Psychologica 121 (2006) 199 209 www.elsevier.com/locate/actpsy The path of visual attention James M. Brown a, *, Bruno G. Breitmeyer b, Katherine A. Leighty a, Hope I. Denney a a Department of Psychology,
More informationGrasping Execution and Grasping Observation Activity of Single Neurons in the Macaque Anterior Intraparietal Area
Grasping Execution and Grasping Observation Activity of Single Neurons in the Macaque Anterior Intraparietal Area Pierpaolo Pani, Tom Theys, Maria C. Romero, and Peter Janssen Abstract Primates use vision
More informationVisuomotor transformations: early cortical mechanisms of reaching Roberto Caminiti*, Stefano Ferraina and Alexandra Battaglia Mayer
753 Visuomotor transformations: early cortical mechanisms of reaching Roberto Caminiti*, Stefano Ferraina and Alexandra Battaglia Mayer Recent studies of visually guided reaching in monkeys support the
More informationOn-line grasp control is mediated by the contralateral hemisphere
available at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/brainres Research Report On-line grasp control is mediated by the contralateral hemisphere Nichola J. Rice a,b, Eugene Tunik a,c, Emily S. Cross
More informationAttention Response Functions: Characterizing Brain Areas Using fmri Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load
Attention Response Functions: Characterizing Brain Areas Using fmri Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load Intro Examine attention response functions Compare an attention-demanding
More informationThe individual animals, the basic design of the experiments and the electrophysiological
SUPPORTING ONLINE MATERIAL Material and Methods The individual animals, the basic design of the experiments and the electrophysiological techniques for extracellularly recording from dopamine neurons were
More informationMax Planck Institut für biologische Kybernetik. Spemannstraße Tübingen Germany
MP Max Planck Institut für biologische Kybernetik Spemannstraße 38 72076 Tübingen Germany Technical Report No. 067 visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Volker
More informationNeurophysiology of systems
Neurophysiology of systems Motor cortex (voluntary movements) Dana Cohen, Room 410, tel: 7138 danacoh@gmail.com Voluntary movements vs. reflexes Same stimulus yields a different movement depending on context
More informationGiacomo Rizzolatti - selected references
Giacomo Rizzolatti - selected references 1 Rizzolatti, G., Semi, A. A., & Fabbri-Destro, M. (2014). Linking psychoanalysis with neuroscience: the concept of ego. Neuropsychologia, 55, 143-148. Notes: Through
More informationTransfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 2002, 22(22):9656 9660 Brief Communication Transfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations Nicole Malfait, 1 Douglas M. Shiller, 1 and David J. Ostry 1,2
More informationPSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. Research Article
Research Article MOVING TO DIRECTLY CUED LOCATIONS ABOLISHES SPATIAL INTERFERENCE DURING BIMANUAL ACTIONS Jörn Diedrichsen, 1 Eliot Hazeltine, 2 Steven Kennerley, 1 and Richard B. Ivry 1 1 University of
More informationANTICIPATING DYNAMIC LOADS IN HANDLING OBJECTS.
ANTICIPATING DYNAMIC LOADS IN HANDLING OBJECTS. Alan M. Wing Sensory Motor Neuroscience Centre, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.m.wing@bham.ac.uk J. Randall Flanagan
More informationPerceptual requirements for fast manual responses
Exp Brain Res (2003) 153:246 252 DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1598-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Eli Brenner Jeroen B. J. Smeets Perceptual requirements for fast manual responses Published online: 28 August 2003 Springer-Verlag
More informationThe Effects of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome on the Kinematics of Reach-to-Pinch Function
The Effects of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome on the Kinematics of Reach-to-Pinch Function Raviraj Nataraj, Peter J. Evans, MD, PhD, William H. Seitz, MD, Zong-Ming Li. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Disclosures:
More information/sco3:/jobs1/elsevier/vr/week.09/pvr3084y.001a.01ue Mar 13 09:48: Page Tue Mar 13 10: Rapid communication
Vision Research 000 (2001) 000 000 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Rapid communication Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle Aarlenne Z. Khan, J. Douglas Crawford * York Centre
More informationFunctional Properties of Grasping-Related Neurons in the Ventral Premotor Area F5 of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol 95: 79 729, 6. First published October 26, 5; doi:1.1152/jn.463.5. Functional Properties of Grasping-Related Neurons in the Ventral Premotor Area F5 of the Macaque Monkey Vassilis Raos,
More informationSupplementary Figure 1. Localization of face patches (a) Sagittal slice showing the location of fmri-identified face patches in one monkey targeted
Supplementary Figure 1. Localization of face patches (a) Sagittal slice showing the location of fmri-identified face patches in one monkey targeted for recording; dark black line indicates electrode. Stereotactic
More informationObservational Learning Based on Models of Overlapping Pathways
Observational Learning Based on Models of Overlapping Pathways Emmanouil Hourdakis and Panos Trahanias Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH) Science and Technology
More informationImplicit Perception in Action
CHAPTER 6 Implicit Perception in Action Short-lived motor representations of space Yves Rossetti Vision et Motricité, I.N.S.E.R.M. Perception is often conscious, which allows one to report about the object
More informationMovement-related activity during goal-directed hand actions in the monkey ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 42, pp. 2882 2894, 2015 doi:10.1111/ejn.13040 COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE Movement-related activity during goal-directed hand actions in the monkey ventrolateral prefrontal
More informationSomatosensory Plasticity and Motor Learning
5384 The Journal of Neuroscience, April 14, 2010 30(15):5384 5393 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Somatosensory Plasticity and Motor Learning David J. Ostry, 1,2 Mohammad Darainy, 1,3 Andrew A. G. Mattar,
More informationMicrocircuitry coordination of cortical motor information in self-initiation of voluntary movements
Y. Isomura et al. 1 Microcircuitry coordination of cortical motor information in self-initiation of voluntary movements Yoshikazu Isomura, Rie Harukuni, Takashi Takekawa, Hidenori Aizawa & Tomoki Fukai
More informationPREMOTOR AND PARIETAL CORTEX: Corticocortical Connectivity and Combinatorial Computations 1
Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1997. 20:25 42 PREMOTOR AND PARIETAL CORTEX: Corticocortical Connectivity and Combinatorial Computations 1 Steven P. Wise Laboratory of Neurophysiology, NIMH, P.O. Box 608, Poolesville,
More informationEye Position Signal Modulates a Human Parietal Pointing Region during Memory-Guided Movements
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1, 2000, 20(15):5835 5840 Eye Position Signal Modulates a Human Parietal Pointing Region during Memory-Guided Movements Joseph F. X. DeSouza, 1 Sean P. Dukelow, 1 Joseph
More informationVisual-Shift Adaptation Is Composed of Separable Sensory and Task-Dependent Effects
J Neurophysiol 98: 2827 2841, 27. First published August 29, 27; doi:1.1152/jn.29.27. Visual-Shift Adaptation Is Composed of Separable Sensory and Task-Dependent Effects M. C. Simani, L. M. M. McGuire,
More informationHand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision
Exp Brain Res (1998) 122:157 164 Springer-Verlag 1998 RESEARCH ARTICLE Lauren E. Sergio Stephen H. Scott Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision Received: 16 July 1997 /
More informationSpatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia A kinematic analysis of aiming movements
Spatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia A kinematic analysis of aiming movements Kathleen Y. Haaland, 1 Deborah L. Harrington 1 and Robert T. Knight 2,3 Brain (1999), 122, 1169 1182 1 Psychology and
More informationThe Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Health and Human Development
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Health and Human Development INTERLIMB DIFFERENCES IN COORDINATION OF UNSUPPORTED REACHING MOVEMENTS A Thesis in Kinesiology by Jacob E.
More informationWhen vision guides movement: a functional imaging study of the monkey brain
NeuroImage 19 (2003) 959 967 www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg When vision guides movement: a functional imaging study of the monkey brain Georgia G. Gregoriou a,b and Helen E. Savaki a,b, * a Department of
More informationEarly Learning vs Early Variability 1.5 r = p = Early Learning r = p = e 005. Early Learning 0.
The temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts individual differences in motor learning ability Howard Wu *, Yohsuke Miyamoto *, Luis Nicolas Gonzales-Castro, Bence P.
More informationDirection of action is represented in the ventral premotor cortex
articles 21 Nature Publishing Group http://neurosci.nature.com Direction of action is represented in the ventral premotor cortex 21 Nature Publishing Group http://neurosci.nature.com Shinji Kakei 1,2,4,
More informationTiming of anticipatory muscle tensing control: responses before and after expected impact
Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:661 667 DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2172-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Timing of anticipatory muscle tensing control: responses before and after expected impact Peter M. Vishton Kristin M. Reardon
More informationSupplementary materials for: Executive control processes underlying multi- item working memory
Supplementary materials for: Executive control processes underlying multi- item working memory Antonio H. Lara & Jonathan D. Wallis Supplementary Figure 1 Supplementary Figure 1. Behavioral measures of
More informationPSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Planning to Reach for an Object Changes How the Reacher Perceives It Peter M. Vishton, Nicolette J. Stephens, Lauren A. Nelson, Sarah E. Morra, Kaitlin L. Brunick,
More informationAvoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness
irstcite e-publishing Received 8 July 23 Accepted 31 July 23 Published online Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness R. D. McIntosh 1,2*, K. I. McClements 1, I. Schindler 1, T. P. Cassidy
More informationThe role of affordances in inhibition of return
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13 (6), 1085-1090 The role of affordances in inhibition of return LUCIA RIGGIO, ILARIA PATTERI, ANNALISA OPPO, and GIOVANNI BUCCINO Universitd di Parma, Farina, Italy
More informationDorsal and Ventral Stream Interaction: Contributions from Optic Ataxia
Dorsal and Ventral Stream Interaction: Contributions from Optic Ataxia Marc Himmelbach and Hans-Otto Karnath Abstract & In monkeys and humans, two functionally specialized cortical streams of visual processing
More informationIntroductory Motor Learning and Development Lab
Introductory Motor Learning and Development Lab Laboratory Equipment & Test Procedures. Motor learning and control historically has built its discipline through laboratory research. This has led to the
More informationControl of Finger Forces during Fast, Slow and Moderate Rotational Hand Movements
Control of Finger Forces during Fast, Slow and Moderate Rotational Hand Movements Hamed Kazemi, Robert E. Kearney, IEEE Fellow, and Theodore E. Milner, IEEE Member Abstract The goal of this study was to
More informationCortical Control of Movement
Strick Lecture 2 March 24, 2006 Page 1 Cortical Control of Movement Four parts of this lecture: I) Anatomical Framework, II) Physiological Framework, III) Primary Motor Cortex Function and IV) Premotor
More informationLong-Term Effects of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Force Control in a Patient with Parkinson s Disease-Driven Action Tremor
Long-Term Effects of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Force Control in a Patient with Parkinson s Disease-Driven Action Tremor Karen L. Francis, PhD* Waneen W. Spirduso, EdD Tim Eakin, PhD Pamela Z.
More informationBehavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 214 (2010) 130 134 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Brain Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbr Research report Short-term motor plasticity
More informationOPTO 5320 VISION SCIENCE I
OPTO 5320 VISION SCIENCE I Monocular Sensory Processes of Vision: Color Vision Mechanisms of Color Processing . Neural Mechanisms of Color Processing A. Parallel processing - M- & P- pathways B. Second
More informationCharacterizing Visual Attention during Driving and Non-driving Hazard Perception Tasks in a Simulated Environment
Title: Authors: Characterizing Visual Attention during Driving and Non-driving Hazard Perception Tasks in a Simulated Environment Mackenzie, A.K. Harris, J.M. Journal: ACM Digital Library, (ETRA '14 Proceedings
More informationTHE SPATIAL EXTENT OF ATTENTION DURING DRIVING
THE SPATIAL EXTENT OF ATTENTION DURING DRIVING George J. Andersen, Rui Ni Department of Psychology University of California Riverside Riverside, California, USA E-mail: Andersen@ucr.edu E-mail: ruini@ucr.edu
More informationEffects of Attention on MT and MST Neuronal Activity During Pursuit Initiation
Effects of Attention on MT and MST Neuronal Activity During Pursuit Initiation GREGG H. RECANZONE 1 AND ROBERT H. WURTZ 2 1 Center for Neuroscience and Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior,
More informationSpatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque monkey
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 22, pp. 956 972, 2005 ª Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Spatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto-occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque
More informationMODELS FOR THE CONTROL OF GRASPING
To appear in Sensorimotor Control of Grasping: Physiology and Pathophysiology, Cambridge University Press MODELS FOR THE CONTROL OF GRASPING *Erhan Oztop JST, ICORP, Computational Brain Project, 4-1-8
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
1 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL Response time and signal detection time distributions SM Fig. 1. Correct response time (thick solid green curve) and error response time densities (dashed red curve), averaged across
More informationModels for the control of grasping
C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP/201262/WORKINGFOLDER/NWK/9780521881579C09.3D 110 [110 124] 15.1.2009 1:53PM 9 Models for the control of grasping erhan oztop and mitsuo kawato Summary This chapter underlines the multifaceted
More informationKinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting
Psychological Research (2007) 71: 13 21 DOI 10.1007/s00426-005-0032-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A. F. de C. Hamilton Æ D. W. Joyce Æ J. R. Flanagan C. D. Frith Æ D. M. Wolpert Kinematic cues in perceptual weight
More informationMulti-Digit Control of Contact Forces During Rotation of a Hand-Held Object
J Neurophysiol 99: 1846 1856, 2008. First published January 30, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.01238.2007. Multi-Digit Control of Contact Forces During Rotation of a Hand-Held Object Sara A. Winges, Stephanie E.
More informationRules of apparent motion: The shortest-path constraint: objects will take the shortest path between flashed positions.
Rules of apparent motion: The shortest-path constraint: objects will take the shortest path between flashed positions. The box interrupts the apparent motion. The box interrupts the apparent motion.
More informationDecoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex
Article Decoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex Adrián Hernández, 1 Verónica Nácher, 1 Rogelio Luna, 1 Antonio Zainos, 1 Luis Lemus, 1 Manuel Alvarez, 1 Yuriria Vázquez, 1 Liliana Camarillo,
More information