TFP: CLINICAL ASSESSMENT. Session 2: John F. Clarkin, Ph.D. borderlinedisorders.com

Transcription

1 TFP: CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Session 2: John F. Clarkin, Ph.D. borderlinedisorders.com

2 TAXONOMY OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS: CONTRASTING THE DSM AND OBJECT RELATIONS APPROACHES

3 1970s: Gunderson and Kernberg Gunderson (Gunderson & Kolb, 1978): Collected clinical descriptors manifested in the observable behavior of borderline patients; these would form the criteria for DSM- III (1980) Kernberg (1975): focused on the disturbed behaviors and the internal representations of self and others, suggesting these mental representations were identifiable, organized, and driving behavior In 1980, we began the investigation of TFP targeted to both the observable behaviors and the internal organization

4 Results of the Phenomenological Approach Search for the organization behind the 8-9 trait-like criteria in DSM Heterogeneity among those who met the criteria for the disorder Confused and unclear phenotype disrupts the search for underlying neurobiological factors

5 Ideas Behind the Development of DSM-5 Notable difficulties with DSM-IV: heterogeneity within the PD diagnosis; rampant PD comorbidity; reliability but little validity Hyman(2011): Too much emphasis on categories Genes and neurobiology don t result in clear categories schizophrenia and bipolar disorder might better be conceptualized as interactions among continuous dimensions rather than well-bound categories Bring personality theory to bare on personality disorder diagnoses

6 Basic Emotional Systems (Pankseep, 2011) PANIC/ separation SEEKING/ expectancy system CARE/ nurturance PLAY/joy RAGE/anger LUST/sexuali ty FEAR/ anxiety

7 Emotional Operating Systems Filtered Through Lens of Object Relations Distorted cognitive appraisal Negative affect Confllicted, intense Interactions with others Deficient efforfful control

8 Personality Disorder: DSM-5, Section 3 Moderate or greater impairment in personality (self/interpersonal) functioning One or more pathological personality traits Negative affectivity vs emotional stability Detachment vs. extraversion Antagonism vs. agreeableness Disinhibition vs. conscientiousness Psychoticism vs. lucidity Impairments are relatively stable across time

9 Level of Self and Interpersonal Functioning: DSM-5, Section 3 Self-functioning Identity Self-direction Interpersonal functioning Empathy Intimacy

10 Levels (Least to Most Severe) of Personality Organization - Kernberg Coping Rigidity Identity Defense s Object Relation s Aggress -ion Mild (Neurotic) Severe (High Level BPO) Most Severe (Low Level BPO) Rigidity Normal High Level Defenses Normal Flexibility Normal Normal Normal Modulated Inconsistent Identity Diffusion Identity Diffusion Primitive Defenses Primitive Defenses Conflicts Poor Poor Varying degrees of aggression Inconsistent Aggression toward others Moral Values Present Present Variable Lacking

11 FIGURE 1 Relationship between familiar, prototypic, personality types and structural diagnosis. Severity ranges from mildest, at the top of the page, to extremely severe at the bottom. Arrows indicate range of severity. Kernberg & Caligor (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In: Major Theories of Personality Disorders, 2 nd Ed. Eds: Clarkin & Lenzenweger. NY, Guilford,

12 PERSONALITY DISORDERS: A TAXONOMY BASED ON THE OBJECT RELATIONS UNDERSTANDING OF PERSONALITY

13 Descriptive Features of Personality Disorder Personality Disorders in general are distortions of normal personality characterized by: Rigidity or loss of flexibility of behavior patterns, resulting in poor adaptation Inhibition of normal behaviors Exaggeration of certain behaviors Chaotic alternation between inhibitory and impulsive behavior patterns Vicious circles develop: abnormal behaviors elicit abnormal responses

14 Consequences of Personality Disorders: - A reduction in the capacity to adapt to the psychosocial environment and to satisfy internal psychological needs (e.g., self-affirmation, sexuality, and dependency). - In turn, personality disorders tend to be re-enforced by the pathological responses that patients elicit in their environment.

15 Axis II from a Personality Organization Point of View Levels of Organization A mixed Categorical and Dimensional System 1-Normal flexibility and adaptation 2-Neurotic level of personality organization 3-Borderline level of personality organization: High level borderline Low level borderline 4-Psychotic level of personality organization

16 Borderline Personality Organization The Defining Characteristics Identity Diffusion vs. integrated view of self and others (internal sense of continuity) No integrated concept of self No integrated concept of significant others Primitive Defenses Splitting Idealization/devaluation Projective identification Omnipotent control Denial Variable Reality Testing

17 FIGURE 1 Relationship between familiar, prototypic, personality types and structural diagnosis. Severity ranges from mildest, at the top of the page, to extremely severe at the bottom. Arrows indicate range of severity. Kernberg & Caligor (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In: Major Theories of Personality Disorders, 2 nd Ed. Eds: Clarkin & Lenzenweger. NY, Guilford,

18 Borderline Personality Organization: Clinical Implications Nonspecific ego weakness Lack of impulse control, anxiety tolerance Disturbed object relations Difficulties with work and love Sexual pathology (Two levels: inhibition of all sexual functioning; chaotic sexuality) Pathology of moral functioning

19 LAYING THE FOUNDATION FOR TREATMENT: CLINICAL EVALUATION

20 BEGINNING TREATMENT Pre-Therapy Assessment Sessions Discussion of Dx and Contracting Sessions Family Session Therapy N.B.: Often a Sense of Urgency Therapy Begins (or not) Goal: To move from Acting Out to Transference

21 CLINICAL ASSESSMENT Patients with personality pathology suffer from an internal structure that results in difficulties in work, friendships, and intimate relations Treatment structure is essential in the treatment of personality pathology, especially in mid to severe ranges of personality pathology

22 Guiding Ideas The human individual is organized at multiple levels Personality is an organization which enables the individual to function Personality organization enables the individual to function in the interpersonal sphere Treatment choice is guided by personality organization, not simply by symptoms or conflicts (see Kernberg & Caligor, 2004)

23 Advantages to Your Group for a Standard Assessment Definition of terms so they are used by all in the same way Assessment that is reliable; done the same by everyone Assessment leading to the application of TFP to patients for whom it is intended

24 Review of Personality Disorders from a Personality Organization Point of View Neurotic organization High level borderline organization Low level borderline organization

25 Personality Organization Figure 1 Relationship between familiar, prototypic, personality types and structural diagnosis. Severity ranges from mildest, at the top of the page, to extremely severe at the bottom. Arrows indicate range of severity. *We include avoidant personality disorder in deference to the DSM. However, in our clinical experience, patients who have been diagnosed with avoidant personality disorder ultimately prove to have another personality disorder that accounts for avoidant pathology. As a result, we question the existence of avoidant personality as a clinical entity. This is a controversial question deserving further study.

26 Structural Interview (Kernberg, 1984) Focus on the patient s thinking and functioning in the present time Begins with standard questions: What brings you here? What are your current difficulties? What do you expect from treatment? In general, where are you now? Key questions assessing representations of self and others: Describe yourself as a unique individual Describe a significant other in detail Interviewer s stance: therapeutic neutrality Sequential use of clarification, confrontation, beginning interpretations

27 The Structural Interview Combination of traditional psychiatric interview, with assessment of personality organization Standard sequence to the interview Yield from the interview: Psychiatric diagnoses Personality organization

28 Symphora Tape: Structural Interview Patient: 43 year old male Chief complaint: Nothing to live for; girl friend taken away Focus of assessment: level of personality pathology; treatment options

29 Levels of Pathology and Major Dimensions (Identity, etc) Mild (Neurotic) Personality Pathology Severe (High Level BPO) Personality Pathology Most Severe (Low Level BPO) Personality Pathology Identity; advanced defenses; low aggression, moral values Identity diffusion; primitive defenses Aggression; relative absence of moral values

30 Levels of Pathology and Treatment Mild (Neurotic) Personality Pathology Severe (High Level BPO) Personality Pathology Most Severe (Low Level BPO) Personality Pathology Transference Interpretations Therapeutic Neutrality Contract Setting Transference Interpretations In and out of Therapeutic Neutrality Questionable use of treatment

31 The Structural Interview Combination of traditional psychiatric interview, with assessment of personality organization Standard sequence to the interview Yield from the interview: Psychiatric diagnoses Personality organization Example: Symphora tapes

32

33 Semi-Structured Interview: STIPO Theory driven Relationship of personality organization to treatment selection Coverage of major constructs dictated by the theory Semi-structured interview format to ensure reliability

34 Constructs in the STIPO Identity Object relations Primitive defenses Coping/rigidity Aggression Moral values Reality testing and perceptual distortions

35 Identity Investment in work How important is work to you? Would you say you are ambitious with respect to work and career? Investment in free time On weekends, or in your free time, what interests do you pursue? Sense of self Tell me about yourself describe yourself so that I get a live and full picture of you Representation of others Tell me about (most important person)

36 Overall Rating of Identity 1. Consolidated identity 2. Some areas of deficit, e.g., mild superficiality or instability in sense of self 3. Mild to moderate instability or discontinuity in sense of self and others 4. Marked instability and superficiality in sense of self and others 5. Severe: contradictory, chaotic views of self and others

37 Object Relations Interpersonal relations Do you have close friends? Tell me about your friendship what do you share with one another? Intimate relations and sexuality Have you been involved in any romantic relationships in the past 5 years? Do you find it difficult to experience tender feelings while still enjoying sex? Internal working model of relationships What is it like for you when people close to you are in need of comfort, or are in emotional distress?

38 Overall Rating of Object Relations 1. Durable, realistic, nuanced, satisfying object relations 2. Some degree of impairment in intimate relations 3. Attachments present but superficial, flawed, need fulfillment, limited empathy 4. Attachments few and flawed 5. Paucity of attachments, no capacity for empathy nor sustained interest in others

39 Primitive Defenses Paranoia Would you consider yourself someone who is cautious about what other people know about you? Erratic behavior Idealization/devaluation Do your feelings for people run hot and cold, change quickly? Black and white thinking Primitive denial Externalization Projective identification

40 Overall Rating of Primitive Defenses 1. No evidence of primitive defenses 2. Some use of primitive defenses 3. Shifts in perception of self and others and related limited impairment in functioning 4. Shifts in perception of self and others severe and pervasive 5. Pervasive use of primitive defenses; radical shifts of perception of self and others

41 Coping/Rigidity Anticipation When you are anticipating stressful events, do you spend time planning ahead? Suppression Flexibility Self-blame Proactive coping Perfectionism Shifting sets Control Worrying Challenges

42 Overall Rating of Coping/Rigidity 1. Flexible, adaptive coping 2. Adaptive coping, but less consistency and efficacy 3. Inconsistent capacity for coping; vulnerable to stress and rigid coping 4. Rigid, maladaptive coping 5. Pervasive maladaptive and inflexible coping

43 Aggression Self-directed aggression Do you sometimes neglect your physical health? Do you at times do things that seem unwise and potentially dangerous, e.g. unprotected sex, heavy drinking or drug use? Other-directed aggression Do you lose your temper with others? Have you at any time ever intentionally seriously harmed someone physically?

44 Overall Rating of Aggression 1. Control, modulation, integration of anger and aggression 2. Aggression through self-neglect, controlling interpersonal style 3. Self-directed, occasional tantrums, hostile verbal aggression 4. Aggression against others 5. Serious danger to safety of others and/or self

45 Moral Values Behavior Guilt Are there times when you deliberately deceive others? Have you ever done anything that is illegal? Can you think of an example when you failed to live up to your personal code? How did you feel? Would you say that you felt guilty?

46 Overall Rating of Moral Values 1. Appropriate concern for unethical behavior; internal moral compass 2. No antisocial behavior; some conflict around personal gain and ethical behavior 3. Some unethical/immoral behavior 4. Violent, aggressive antisocial behavior 5. Violent, aggressive antisocial behavior; no notion of moral values and guilt

47 Prototypic Neurotic, High and Low Level BPO Patients

48 Uses of the STIPO Provides reliable assessment of level of personality organization Defines in concrete terms and questions psychoanalytic concepts such as identity Provides a method of empirically subgrouping patients (e.g., borderline, low level borderline) First step to measurement of change in personality organization

49 Subtypes of BPD: Assessment Implications Assessment of extraversion/intraversion, moral values, level and management of aggression, quality of object relations

50 STIPO Profiles on SNAP Based Categories NPO BPO-High BPO-Low

51 Antisocial Paranoia Aggression Group I Low Low Low Group II Moderate High Low Group III High Moderate High

52 Associated Features of the Three Groups Group I: high Constraint, high Social Closeness, low Physical Abuse, low Depression and Somatization Group II: low Social Closeness, high Sexual Abuse Group III: high Negative Affect, low Constraint, high Depression and Somatization, high Identity Diffusion