Basic Risk Assessment. Kemshall, H., Mackenzie, G., Wilkinson, B., (2011) Risk of Harm Guidance and Training Resource CD Rom, De Montfort University

Transcription

1 Basic Risk Assessment Kemshall, H., Mackenzie, G., Wilkinson, B., (2011) Risk of Harm Guidance and Training Resource CD Rom, De Montfort University 1

2 Risk Assessment A continuous and dynamic process Fairness and balance Informing risk management Engaging and involving the offender 2

3 Purpose of OASys Assess likelihood of reoffending. To identify and classify offending-related needs. To assess risk of serious harm, risk to the individual and other risks. 3

4 Purpose of OASys To assist with the management of risk of serious harm. To link the assessment to the sentence plan. To indicate the need for further specialist assessments. To measure change during the offender's sentence. 4

5 Structured Professional Judgment Systematic evidence based actuarial and professional assessments Of the offender and their behaviour in context. Requires the use of knowledge and skills, 5

6 Case ID Offending Information OGRS Attitudes Accommodation Thinking Behaviour Emotional Well being Offending behaviour ETE Finances Alcohol Misuse Relationships Drug Misuse Lifestyle Associates 6

7 Estimating the Likelihood of Further Offending The Offender Group Reconviction Score OGRS3 - static risk information Two further scores - 60% static and 40% dynamic risk factors: OASys General Predictor Score (OGP) predicts the likelihood of non sexual, non violent offences. OASYs Violence Predictor Score (OVP) predicts the likelihood of violent type offences. 7

8 8

9 OASys including Risk of Serious Harm Full assessment Risk Management Plan Supervision and Sentence Planning Review 9

10 The Quality of Assessments An investigative approach is adopted, actively seeking information. Information is verified wherever possible. Clear distinctions are drawn between fact and opinion. Opinions clearly derive from the evidence. 10

11 Analyses Self aware Persists Decision Making Communicates Organised 11

12 What Understanding the Significance of Information does the information mean is the reliability of the source does it tell me about the pattern of offending does it tell me about triggers and circumstance? Is there any evidence that risk is escalating? 12

13 The Lens Model RISK FACTORS What we know about all violent offenders Historical Personal Environmental What we know about this offender RISK JUDGEMENTS 13

14 Walking Through the Offence Thinking Feeling Behaving Means Opportunities Victims 14

15 15

16 Costs Benefits Costs Benefits Readiness to change 16

17 "the same cognitive factors that are likely to influence treatment readiness are also themselves likely to be targets for change in treatment" [Chambers, 2008, p. 282] e.g. Assuming hostility in others a distortion among many violent offenders is also likely to affect their ability to trust and engage with practitioners and any treatment services. 17

18 Socratic Why What When Where Who How Questions Reasons and evidence Perspectives Consequences Attitudes and beliefs Assumptive use with care. 18

19 Denial Behaviour Responsibility Impact Rationalising justifying Offending no longer a problem 19

20 Denial or Excuses Strategies for the Assessor Excuses - helping identify risk factors. Be alert for external attributions being made and their likely impact on harmful behaviour. Underlying ways of thinking about the world that affect the offender and not just the offending behaviour Consider with the offender, taking active responsibility for changing the future, rather than simply acknowledging past faults. 20

21 Assessing and Planning Using the Good Lives Model Identify risk factors What are they hoping to achieve through offending? (Primary Goods) Identify pro-social strengths Identify pro-social ways of achieving goods Consider external realties Create plan Adapted from Ward and Maruna

22 Transition to Adult System When working with younger offenders do you Break up the interview into manageable chunks? Be careful to explain the process clearly and regularly check out their understanding of it? Use a range of methods other than just asking questions to engage the offender in the process? Allow more time to explore their situation and how they understand the world.? 22

23 Consider The extent to which the offender has already caused serious harm - frequency and escalation Diversity of offences and offending behaviour; Triggers and situations associated with harmful behaviour do they still exist? Are opportunities for harmful acts increasing or decreasing? The offenders insight into their offending and the harm that they have caused 23

24 Consider Idiosyncratic or aggravating factors including use of weapons The offenders attitude to victims, or victim groups Relevant information about victims. The offender's motivation to commit further offences. The offender's motivation and ability to change. 24

25 Good Practice Suggestions Appropriate weight given to OGP, OVP and to OGRs When an assessor judges that a score is an under, or overestimate, the reasons clearly recorded in OASYs. Assessors should seek to include all relevant information in OASys, a range of past and present behaviours, not just the current offence. 25

26 Good Practice Suggestions An OASys should include a clear narrative account of the offence history. Decisions based on a full range of risk factors. Pay closer attention to the situation and context within which offending occurs Include protective factors as well as risks. 26

27 Individual Protective/ Strengths Situational INCREASING LIKELIHOOD e.g. Insight, Motivation pro-social skills An Offence Triggers / Acute e.g. Pro-social influences Employment e.g. increasing substance misuse, collapse of social supports, disengagement, changes in mental health, particular situations Reducing Offending Individual e.g. Attitudes, patterns of Thinking and behaviour Predisposing Situational e.g. offending opportunities Pro-offending peers Supporting Offending 27

28 Contingencies Scenario Planning A range of possible future scenarios - what has this offender done before? Avoid false assumptions, what might change? (Victim, Location, Other) Scenarios for each of the changes. What might happen, think about the potential for escalation. Discount similar scenarios and the unbelievable. Identify any new triggers or risk factors to be alert to. How would this affect your risk management? 28

29 Likelihood Impact Imminence Over estimating risk Under estimating risk Balanced Risk Judgements 29

30 Offender + Victim + Circumstances = Offence Scott 30

31 Progressive Dangerousness Actively seeking To create opportunities Seeking out opportunities Attitudes and beliefs The chance one off 31

32 Victim Blaming Licence 32

33 Low Levels of Risk Current evidence does not indicate likelihood of serious harm Medium There are identifiable indicators of risk of serious harm the offender has the potential to cause serious harm but unlikely to do so unless there is a change in circumstances, for example failure to take medication, loss of accommodation, relationship breakdown, drug or alcohol misuse 33

34 High Levels of Risk There are identifiable indicators of risk of serious harm potential The potential event could happen at any time and the impact would be serious Very High There is an imminent risk of serious harm. The potential event is more likely than not to happen imminently and the impact would be serious 34

35 4 Tier Framework Increasing Resource Allocation In Tiers Help Control Change Punish Increasing complexity sentence and risk 35