The EQUATOR Network: a global initiative to improve the quality of reporting research

Transcription

1 The EQUATOR Network: a global initiative to improve the quality of reporting research

2 Author behaviour concerning publishing health research (1) A journal received a submission it had already rejected twice after peer-review: in the first submission the study was comparative in the second submission the study was cut to a onearm description in the third submission the study had become again comparative The authors made no allusion to the previous submissions and reviewer comments Ioannidis JPA, et al. EJCI 2010;40: slide 2 of 20

3 Author behaviour concerning publishing health research (2) Omit submitting for publication a substantial amount of their research In a recent systematic review update of 79 studies examining research initially presented at scientific meetings and followed forward to publication Only 53% of the meeting presentations were subsequently published after nine years Scherer RW, et al. CDSR 2007;2:MR slide 3 of 20

4 Author behaviour concerning publishing health research (3) 80 consecutive studies subsequently published in Evidence Based Medicine (Oct 05 for 12 months) 55 RCTs; 25 SRs Usable information about the intervention missing from 41/80 Glasziou P, et al. BMJ 2008;336; slide 4 of 20

5 Author behaviour concerning publishing health research (4) 10 essential elements about intervention e.g., drug name, dose, route... Examined 262 reports of randomized trials from most prominent oncology journals Overall, only 11% of articles reported all 10 essential items Duff JM et al. JNCI : slide 5 of 20

6 Author behaviour concerning publishing health research (5) Selecting specific outcomes to tell readers about the selection based on the results Dwan K, et al. PLoS ONE 2008;3: e3081 slide 6 of 20

7 Net effect This research investment should be protected from the avoidable waste of inadequately producing and reporting research Chalmers and Glasziou Thoughtful consideration of reporting trial-related procedures that could assist with turning best evidence to best Practice would be worthwhile Careful and consistent reporting would help to promote safe and effective clinical application of oncology therapeutics... Dancey Chalmer and Glasziou Lancet 2009;374:86-89; Dancey JNCI 2010; 102: slide 7 of 20

8 Reasons authors behave like this Don t know completely Publish of peril Needs to be studied Fanelli D, PLoS ONE 2010;5: e10271 slide 8 of 20

9 Changing author behaviour The EQUATOR Network An international initiative set up to improve reliability of health research publications slide 9 of 20

10 Seven major goals of the EQUATOR Network 1. Develop and maintain a comprehensive internet based resource centre providing up-to-date information, tools and other materials related to health research reporting 2. Assist in the development, dissemination and implementation of robust reporting guidelines 3. Actively promote the use of reporting guidelines and good research reporting practices through an education and training program 4. Conduct regular assessments of how journals implement and use reporting guidelines 5. Conduct regular audits of the reporting quality across the whole spectrum of health research literature 6. Set up a global network of local EQUATOR collaborating centres in order to facilitate the improvement of health research reporting on a worldwide scale 7. Develop a general strategy for translating the principles of responsible research reporting into practice Simera I, et al. BMC Medicine 2010;8:24 slide 10 of 20

11 Steps to support and practice accurate and transparent reporting of health research Find out about reporting requirements early when planning your research study When writing up your research, check the EQUATOR website for any new relevant reporting guidelines in order to help improve the quality of your manuscript Simera I, et al. BMC Medicine 2010;8:24 slide 11 of 20

12 EQUATOR resources slide 12 of 20

13 Reporting guidelines Checklist Flow diagram Explicit text to guide authors in reporting a specific type of research, developed using explicit methodology Moher D, et al. PLoS Med 2010;7(2): e slide 13 of 20

14 A surgical safety checklist The rate of death was 1.5% before the checklist was introduced and declined to 0.8% afterward (P = 0.003). Inpatient complications occurred in 11.0% of patients at baseline and in 7.0% after introduction of the checklist (P<0.001 Haynes AB, et al. NEJM 2009;360: slide 14 of 20

15 Differences in reporting of methodological items between CONSORT endorsing and non-endorsing journals in 2006 slide 15 of 20

16 EQUATOR resources slide 16 of 20

17 EQUATOR resources Developing a comprehensive educational program Webinar Crystal clear reporting of systematic reviews and EQUATOR Network eature=player_embedded Developing short courses Editors and peer reviewers Young research professionals and research students slide 17 of 20

18 What can you do to help improve the quality of reporting health research? Author Adhere to the relevant reporting guideline(s) when not reporting on certain items explain the reason why Reporting guidelines provide a minimum set of items other details specific to your particular study might be relevant for a clear and complete account of what was done and found. Institution Ensure your workplace: Implements a policy whereby research from the institution must use reporting guidelines insist upon populating a reporting guideline checklist for each journal submission Ask your institution leadership to set aside resources to develop courses on reporting research and peer review slide 18 of 20

19 GOOD REPORTING IS A MANDATORY COMPONENT OF GOOD SCIENCE, NOT AN OPTIONAL EXTRA Ziman J. Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1978 slide 19 of 20

20 Thank you! slide 20 of 20