Managing the risks of clinical trials: the MRC/MHRA approach
|
|
- Rosaline Chapman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Managing the risks of clinical trials: the MRC/MHRA approach Sarah Meredith MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL UCL Institute for Clinical Trials and Methodology FCRIN Workshop, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris 23 September 2012
2 Outline MRC/DH/MHRA ad-hoc review of issues for UK non-commercial clinical trials and working group on risk-adapted approaches to trial management Risk assessment guidance Practical application at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit Further research
3 Background MRC/DH Joint Project 2003 Assist in interpretation of CTD in UK Best practise guidance ct-toolkit MRC/DH/MHRA Ad hoc Review Chaired by Profs Janet Darbyshire & Kent Woods Review issues for non-commercial trials since 2003, identify gaps Four work-streams 1. Risk-adapted approaches for managing clinical trials 2. Communications 3. Co-ordinated response to EC consultation on the CTD 4. Education and Training
4 Working Group for Risk-Adaptions Work-stream Martyn Ward, MHRA Clinical Trials Unit Sarah Meredith, MRC Clinical Trials Unit Co-leads Gillian Booth, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Carrol Gamble, MCRN Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool Heather House, Oxford University & John Radcliffe Hospital Martin Landray, Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford Wilma van Riel, Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit Louise Mawer/Andrew Fisher, MHRA GCP Inspectorate
5 Safeguarding MRC/DH/MHRA public health Ad-hoc review of issues for UK clinical trials Risk-adapted approaches to trial management Objectives: Develop a process to facilitate the agreement of key stakeholderson the level of risk associated with a clinical trial. Identify how risk adapted approaches for clinical trials can be achieved within the current regulatory framework Develop a risk assessment tool with guidance principles on how to manage and conduct clinical trials of IMPs in a risk proportionate way.
6 Output of work-stream MRC/DH/MHRA Joint Project Risk-adapted approaches to management of clinical trials of investigational medicinal products Publication October 2011 Risk assessment framework Appendix 1 Guidance on risk-adapted approaches within the scope of the Clinical Trials Directive Appendix 2 Guidance on risk-proportionate approaches to the management and monitoring of clinical trials Availability: MHRA, NETSCC and MRC CTU London Hub Websites
7 Risk-based approach? Perception of clinical trial risks may depend on role and responsibilities in the trial Funder Sponsor Investigator Host Trust Ethics Committee Regulatory Assessor Regulatory Inspector Insurer Objective: to facilitate the agreement of stakeholders on risks associated with a clinical trial Focus: Risks inherent in the protocol
8 Project Scope Focus on risks inherent in the protocolfor Participant safety - due to the trial intervention - due to clinical procedures Participant rights -due to inadequacy of the consent process - due to failure to protect participant data Reliability of results Identify, and if possible, integrate/align with other relevant initiatives in this area (UK & EU) Not addressed: site facilities, staff training/experience See NIHR Support Services Framework
9 Risk Assessment Framework Principles Risks for for participants should be be judged relative to to risks of of standard care IMP licensing status has implications for: --Risk Risk adaptations possible within the the EUCTD -Patient safety monitoring and and the the importance of of safety data -- Trial conduct and monitoring ( but but does not not determine them) - 1. IMP risk categorisation Other trial risks more complex and not easily less amenable to Other simple trial categorisation risks multi-faceted at the trial and level not easily less amenable to simple - To categorisation be assessed individually at the trial and level mitigation plan developed - To be assessed individually and mitigation plan developed 1. IMP risk category 2. Customised 2. Customised risk assessment assessment of other risks
10 1. Assessment of IMP risks Assess potential risk associated with trial interventions (IMP) Assess risk in relation to normal standard care Simple 3-level categorisation based on licensing status and standard practice To be agreed with the regulatory authority at submission of CTA Type A: Comparable to standard care Type B: Somewhat higher than standard care Type C: Markedly higher than standard care
11 Classification of risks associated with the IMP Type A = Risk no higher than standard medical care; e.g. Trials involving IMPs licensed in any EU Member State where the use: relates to the licensed range of indications, dosage and form, or off-label use if this is established practice and supported by sufficient published evidence and/or guidelines (e.g. paediatrics and oncology) Type B = Risk somewhat higher than standard care; e.g. Trials involving IMPs licensed in any EU Member State where the IMP: is used for a new indication (different patient population/disease group), or involves substantial dosage modifications, or is used in combinations for which interactions are suspected Trials involving IMPs not licensed in any EU Member State if the active substance is part of a medicinal product licensed in the EU Type C = Risk markedly higher than standard care; e.g. Trials involving a medicinal product not licensed in any EU Member State Lower grading may be justified based on pre-clinical or clinical evidence or clinical experience
12 Risk Adaptions possible within the CTD Increasing potential risk of IMP Non- Interventional Type A Type B Type C Risk Adaptations possible? 1. Reduced MHRA role for approval 2. Content of application 3. Labelling 4. Safety Surveillance 5. IMP management 6. Documentation 7. GCP Inspections * * * * * * * Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No (Yes) (Yes) (Yes) (Yes) (Yes) (Yes) No No (Yes) No (Yes) No (Yes)
13 Safety Monitoring Plan Safeguarding public health Table 2: Study Title: Risks associated with Therapeutic Interventions o LOW Comparable to the risk of standard medical care o MODERATE Higher than the risk of standard medical care Risk Mitigation to ensure Safety of Participants Protocol No. o HIGH Markedly higher than the risk of standard medical care EudraCT No. Justification: Please briefly justify your conclusions below (where the table is completed in detail the detail need not be repeated, however a summary should be given): What are the key risks related to therapeutic interventions you plan to monitor in this trial? How will these risks be minimised? Body system/hazard IMP Activity Frequency Comments GIT raised transaminases ABC 123 LFTs 2-weekly Transient & reversible CVS prolonged QT interval ABC 123 Digital ECG, Holter monitoring X hours X hours Arrhythmia
14 2. Customised approach to other risks Risks related to the design and methods of the trial participant safety and rights reliability of results Not amenable to simple categorisation at the trial level. To be assessed independently and mitigation plan developed Suggested process: Identify specific areas of vulnerability Consider specific mitigation and management strategies Determine whether monitoring detect/reduce potential for error Objectives of Risk Assessment: Inform protocol development Targeted management and monitoring plans
15 Assessment Safeguarding public health of non-intervention risks: 1. Participant safety and rights from study procedures a) Clinical procedures Risk to participants compared to standard care Additional procedures/additional risks? b) Consent Risk of inadequate consent compared to a fully competent adult with a chronic condition Consider population and circumstances c) Protection of personal data Are any particularly sensitive data being collected? With whom will they be shared? Personal identifiers?
16 Assessment Safeguarding public health of non-intervention risks: 2. Reliability of results Reliability of results is strongly related to robust trial design Identify specific areas of vulnerability Consider specific mitigation and management strategies Determine whether monitoring detect/reduce potential for error Some aspects to consider (list not comprehensive) Eligibility criteria Complexity/special assessments required Precision required for trial validity Potential for external verification Randomisation method Is there any possibility that the randomisation schedule would differ from that described in the protocol or that treatment allocation might be predicted prior to randomisation?
17 Reliability of trial results cont d Intervention Is it a complex intervention/treatment regimen in which might be applied incorrectly? Demanding IMP management/dispensing requirements Masking/blinding Who needs to be masked? If it is required, is it effective? Endpoints Objectivity Complexity of assessment/standardisation/valid methods Potential for external verification Follow-up Is the follow-up schedule difficult? (e.g. long and different from standard care)
18 Reliability of trial results cont d Statistical issues Sample size -Is there sufficient power to detect the anticipated effect of the intervention? Barriers to full recruitment? Clear/appropriate analysis plan Data collection Volume and complexity Design and piloting of CRF Database design/validation and testing Data transfer methods NB List is not comprehensive..
19 Risk-adapted monitoring strategy Potential risk of the intervention /IMP Type A Concerns identified in the assessment of risk associated with the design and methods of the trial (other than the intervention) No A Central monitoring of protocol adherence and data quality. No requirement for site visiting unless there are concerns identified from central monitoring that cannot be addressed by other means Yes A+ As outlined in A, plus appropriate monitoring to address the specific vulnerabilities associated with the design and methods identified in the risk assessment. Type B B Central monitoring of safety data quality and timeliness as well as protocol adherence and quality of other trial data. Triggered visits for poor data return or protocol adherence concerns as well as unusually low or high frequency of SAE reports (for studies where between-site comparisons are possible). Type C C More intense monitoring than above to have confidence in the completeness and reliability of safety data B+ As outlined in B, plus appropriate monitoring to address the specific vulnerabilities associated with the design and methods identified in the risk assessment. C+ As outlined in C, plus appropriate monitoring to address the specific vulnerabilities associated with the design and methods identified in the risk assessment.
20 Safeguarding Application public health of risk-based approach at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit Risk assessment undertaken by Trial Management Team High-level prior to funding application Full prior submission for regulatory/ethics approval Regular review throughout the life-time of the trial Formal review if risks have changed, and at least annually Risk assessments reviewed by Research Governance Committee Does the Committee agree with the assessment? Are the risks being adequately managed? Do the trial management documents address all the issues identified? Have there been any problems?`
21 Risk Assessment Any hazards or uncertainties integral to, or relevant to, a project which may put at risk either the successful achievement of the project objectives or the reputation or resources of MRC CTU should be identified. For each hazard identified, the probability and impact of adverse consequences are estimated and mitigation proposed Hazards specified on the RA form only if their mitigation requires quality management procedures that are in addition to the normal controls described in MRC CTU SOPs and Policies
22 Risk Assessment Categories Safety and Rights of Participants Nature of the intervention (for CTIMPs IMP type) Invasiveness of clinical procedures relative to standard care Participant vulnerability/rights Project Design and Reliability of Results Project Management and Governance Complexity of the collaboration Sponsorship arrangements Country level governance issues Sites Other Considerations Additional risks relevant to particular projects which should be assessed and documented
23 MRC CTU Research Governance Committee Review and approval of all trial Risk Assessment and Quality Management Plans Initial, as there are changes, annual review Oversight of implementation of MRC CTU quality management policy Oversight of SOP Committee Commissioning of audits if required Coordination of inspections and audits conducted by external groups and corrective action plan management Advisory board for governance and quality issues for staff
24 MRC CTU on-going research: TEMPER Study Prospective evaluation of triggered monitoring Monitoring visits to triggered and matched un-triggered site in the same trial Sites matched on time since opening and number of participants Comparison of number of critical/major findings
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 720 RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS SPONSORED. BY THE NNUH and UEA
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 720 RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS SPONSORED BY THE NNUH and UEA Version 1.0 Version date 13.12.2016 Effective date 13.12.2016 Number of pages 11 pages Review date November
More informationNEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
SOP details SOP title: SOP number: SOP category: Version number: 03 Version date: 19 December 2016 Effective date: 19 January 2017 Revision due date: 19 January 2020 NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD
More informationStandard Operating Procedure Research Governance
Queen s University Belfast Research and Enterprise Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance Title: Application to MHRA for Clinical Trials Authorisation SOP Reference QUB-ADRE-OlO Date prepared
More informationStandard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office Title of SOP: GCP Inspection Procedures (MHRA) SOP Number: 15 Version Number: 2.0 Supercedes: 1.0 Effective date: August 2013 Review
More informationResearch & Development. J H Pacynko and J Illingworth. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff
Department Title of SOP Research & Development Safety reporting SOP SOP reference no: R&D GCP SOP 07 Authors: Current version number and date: J H Pacynko and J Illingworth Version 9, 31.01.18 Next review
More informationAnnual Progress and Safety Reporting SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs
R&D Department Annual Progress and Safety Reporting SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust 2010 All Rights Reserved No part of this document may be reproduced, stored
More informationThe EU PIP - a step in Pediatric Drug Development. Thomas Severin Bonn,
The EU PIP - a step in Pediatric Drug Development Thomas Severin Bonn, 13.01.2009 Agenda Implications for Industry Company Preparation Time of PIP Submission Content of the PIP The PIP Process and first
More informationSOP-QA-30 V Scope
Title: Effective Date: 1-4-17 Review Date: 1-4-20 Author: Joanne Rodger, Senior R&D Manager QA Approval: Richard Cowie, QA Manager Approver: Prof Maggie Cruickshank, R&D Director Approver: Prof Steve Heys,
More informationMHRA Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) Inspection Findings
MHRA Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) Inspection Findings Gretel Sakyi Medical Information and Patient Safety Manager AstraZeneca UK 07 June 2018 Agenda MHRA inspections How inspectors use the
More informationStatistical Analysis Plans
Statistical Analysis Plans PROFESSOR CARROL GAMBLE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL Clinical Trials Lots of different types of clinical trials Various interventions Pharmaceutical/drugs regulated Regulated environment
More informationWe are currently recruiting new members to advisory groups for the following research programmes:
Information for applicants to join NIHR as an advisory group member: HTA Programme Topic Identification, Development and Evaluation (TIDE) panel Chairs 1. Background information The goal of the National
More informationStandard Operating Procedure. Selection of studies performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice for audit purposes
Scope To describe the procedure for EFSA to request on a yearly or ad-hoc basis the performance of GLP studies audits by the GLP Monitoring Authorities. To lay down criteria for the selection of the GLP
More informationCurrent European Experience with trial approval in early development : Afssaps (France)
Current European Experience with trial approval in early development : Afssaps (France) Dr Chantal Bélorgey Head, Clinical Trials and special status MP Department AGAH-Club Phase 1 28 April 2009 FIH in
More informationStandard Operating Procedure CPFT/SOP003 Serious Breach of Protocol or GCP in CTIMPs
Standard Operating Procedure CPFT/SOP003 Serious Breach of Protocol or GCP in CTIMPs Author: Sponsor/Executive: Responsible committee: Ratified by: Consultation & Approval: (Committee/Groups which signed
More informationGLP Update and Hot Topics
GLP Update and Hot Topics RQA Annual Conference Mark Goodwin 9 Nov 2016 Introduction International GLP Updates OECD including MAD Agreement EC/ EMA US FDA & US EPA UK GLP Update MHRA MHRA GLP Deficiencies
More informationl Chief Investigator/R & D Committee member
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare '~l:~j Breach of Protocol or Good Clinical Practice SOP Reference R&D-SOP-SOS-002 Version Number Effective Date 19'" February 2010 Review Date 18 m February 2012
More informationDefinition of Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) and use of Auxiliary Medicinal Products (AMPs)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Consultation document Definition of Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs) and use of Auxiliary Medicinal Products (AMPs) Recommendations
More informationSTANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP Number C117 Version Number 2.1 Effective Date 01 Sept 2018 Author Angela Pinder Related SOPs C108: Sponsorship C109: Code Break C118: Risk Assessment
More informationSTANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Title Reference Number Site Initiation SOP-RES-010 Version Number 2 Issue Date 15 Apr 2016 Effective Date 26 May 2016 Review Date 26 May 2018 Author(s) Reviewer(s) Rachelle
More informationResearch Integrity & Ethics. Rowena Lamb Cultures of Integrity Coordinator
Research Integrity & Ethics Rowena Lamb Cultures of Integrity Coordinator UCL Statement on Research Integrity Applies to all staff and students at UCL Sets out the standards all those involved with research
More informationDATA MONITORING COMMITTEE & TRIAL STEERING COMMITTEE CHARTERS
DATA MONITORING COMMITTEE & TRIAL STEERING COMMITTEE CHARTERS DOCUMENT NO.: CR015 v1.0 AUTHOR: Lorn Mackenzie ISSUE DATE: 31 January 2017 EFFECTIVE DATE: 14 February 2017 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Academic
More informationUNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE
UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES University of Leicester (UoL)
More informationMRC Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research Gordon Murray, University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh All All Ireland Ireland North West Midlands MRC-CTSU - CTSU MRC MRC- - BSU ConDuCT MRC- - CTU MRC Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research Gordon Murray, University of Edinburgh www.methodologyhubs.mrc.ac.uk
More informationResponse to: Concept paper of 9 February 2011 submitted for public consultation by the European Commission on the
Response to: Concept paper of 9 February 2011 submitted for public consultation by the European Commission on the REVISION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC Submitted by the European AIDS Treatment
More informationOnline Form. Welcome to the Integrated Research Application System. IRAS Project Filter
Welcome to the Integrated Research Application System IRAS Project Filter The integrated dataset required for your project will be created from the answers you give to the following questions. The system
More informationRoyal College of Radiologists (RCR) Referral guidelines. Final Accreditation Report. Guidance producer: Guidance product: Date: 29 June 2010
Guidance producer: Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) Guidance product: Referral guidelines Date: 29 June 2010 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation... 3 Implementation...
More informationEquality Impact Assessment (EIA)
March 2011 Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) Title of function, policy / procedure, project or proposal (FPPP): A 0401 Procedure - Cannabis Simple Possession Date of Assessment: 28 th August, 2014 Assessment
More informationMeeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body
Meeting of Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body To be held on Tuesday 24 February 2015 commencing at 13:30 at the Vassall Centre, Gill Avenue, Bristol, BS16 2QQ Title: OFSTED Report Agenda
More informationLEAF Marque Assurance Programme
Invisible ISEAL Code It is important that the integrity of the LEAF Marque Standard is upheld therefore the LEAF Marque Standards System has an Assurance Programme to ensure this. This document outlines
More informationPrimary Health Networks
Primary Health Networks Drug and Alcohol Treatment Activity Work Plan 2016-17 to 2018-19 Drug and Alcohol Treatment Budget Gippsland When submitting this Activity Work Plan 2016-2018 to the Department
More informationEFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea Gervelmeyer
TECHNICAL REPORT APPROVED: 29 June 2018 doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1446 Abstract EFSA cross-cutting guidance lifecycle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Daniela Maurici, Raquel Garcia Matas, Andrea
More informationBioequivalence Requirements: USA and EU
Bioequivalence Requirements: USA and EU Dr. Nicholas Cappuccino Chair, IGPA Science Committee Global Head of Quality, Dr. Reddy s Laboratories Ltd. 15 th Annual IGPA Conference Kyoto, Japan December 6,
More informationIdentifying distinguishing features of the MDC model within the five ACE projects
Identifying distinguishing features of the MDC model within the five ACE projects Context: The ACE Programme (Wave 2) has been working with five projects across England to trial and evaluate the concept
More informationDementia Priority Setting Partnership. PROTOCOL March 2012
Dementia Priority Setting Partnership PROTOCOL March 2012 Purpose The purpose of this protocol is to set out the aims, objectives and commitments of the Dementia Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) and
More informationMHRA Anti-counterfeiting Strategy and Supply Chain Guidance
Safeguarding public health MHRA Anti-counterfeiting Strategy and Supply Chain Guidance PQG Annual Meeting for QPs 24 Mar 2010 Nimo Ahmed Head of Intelligence Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
More informationKEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE NEW MEDICAL DEVICE AND THE OTC REGULATIONS IN EUROPE
RNI Conseil 2017 Tous droits réservés Toute reproduction interdite sans l'autorisation de l'auteur. KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE NEW MEDICAL DEVICE AND THE OTC REGULATIONS IN EUROPE Anne Laure TARDY, PhD
More informationCOMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
The European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 15 December 2005 EMEA/357981/2005 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON PROCEDURES
More informationResults and Recommendations: Effective and Efficient Monitoring as a Component of Quality Assurance in the Conduct of Clinical Trials
Results and Recommendations: Effective and Efficient Monitoring as a Component of Quality Assurance in the Conduct of Clinical Trials Team Leaders: Briggs Morrison (Pfizer), Rachel Behrman(OMP, CDER),
More informationChanging practice to support service delivery
Nurse and Midwife Medicinal Product Prescribing Toolkit Authorised Medicinal Products, Off-label Prescription and Exempt Medicinal Products Toolkit Changing practice to support service delivery Introduction
More informationOverview Internal review
Overview Internal review Presentation title: QRM, It s not all about the assessment Track title: Day 1, Session 2 Speaker: Seamus Orr Date / Time: 10 August 2015, 14.30 15.00 Time allotted: 30 minutes
More informationScoping Exercise on Fallers Clinics
Scoping Exercise on Fallers Clinics Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO) March 2007 prepared by Sarah Lamb* Simon Gates* Joanne Fisher* Matthew
More informationEngaging with our stakeholders
Engaging with our stakeholders Report to: Board Date: 27 June 2014 Report by: Report No: Jenny Copland, Senior Communications Adviser Agenda Item: 6.3 PURPOSE OF REPORT To propose a format and processes
More informationCare and Social Services Inspectorate Wales. Care Standards Act Inspection Report. ategi Shared Lives Scheme. Cardiff
Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales Care Standards Act 2000 Inspection Report ategi Shared Lives Scheme Cardiff Type of Inspection Focused Date of inspection Monday, 11 January 2016 Date of publication
More informationAccess to clinical trial information and the stockpiling of Tamiflu. Department of Health
MEMORANDUM FOR THE COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS HC 125 SESSION 2013-14 21 MAY 2013 Department of Health Access to clinical trial information and the stockpiling of Tamiflu 4 Summary Access to clinical
More informationother. We did not include Black mixed as there was not enough data about this group in the records. Read more about how this was calculated here
In the UK, 1 in 4 Black men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer at some point in their lives. 1 That s double the 1 in 8 risk for the general male population. Participation of Black men on clinical
More informationEPF s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the "Summary of Clinical Trial Results for Laypersons"
EPF s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the "Summary of Clinical Trial Results for Laypersons" August 2016 This document received funding under an operating grant from the European
More information2008 Public Status Report on the Implementation of the European Risk Management Strategy. Executive Summary
European Medicines Agency London, 17 March 2009 Doc. Ref. EMEA/43556/2009 2008 Status Report on the Implementation of the European Risk Management Strategy Executive Summary The European Risk Management
More informationA critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument
A critical appraisal of: Canadian guideline fysisk aktivitet using the AGREE II Instrument Created with the AGREE II Online Guideline Appraisal Tool. No endorsement of the content of this document by the
More informationSafeguarding Business Plan
Safeguarding Business Plan 2015-2018 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Care Act 3. Organisational Development 4. Vision, Values and Strategic Objectives 5. Financial Plan 6. Appendix A Action Plan 7. Appendix
More informationDorset Health and Wellbeing Board
Dorset Health and Wellbeing Board Date of Meeting 09 November 2016 Subject of Report Sustainability and Transformation Plan Refresh Update Report Author Partner Organisation Tim Goodson, Chief Officer,
More informationMinistry of Health and Long-Term Care. Palliative Care. Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.08, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW
Chapter 1 Section 1.08 Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Palliative Care Follow-Up on VFM Section 3.08, 2014 Annual Report RECOMMENDATION STATUS OVERVIEW # of Status of Actions Recommended Actions
More informationHearing aid dispenser approval process review Introduction Hearing aid dispenser data transfer... 6
Hearing aid dispenser approval process review 2010 11 Content 1.0 Introduction... 4 1.1 About this document... 4 1.2 Overview of the approval process... 4 2.0 Hearing aid dispenser data transfer... 6 2.1
More informationE11(R1) Addendum to E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Pediatric Population Step4
E11(R1) Addendum to E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the Step4 October 2017 International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use 1 Legal
More informationPATIENT GROUP DIRECTION PROCEDURE
PATIENT GROUP DIRECTION PROCEDURE Date approved 2 October 2015 Version 3 Approved by Yvette Oade, Chief Medical Officer Procedure Lead Clinical Governance Lead - Medicines Management Procedure Author Karen
More informationReflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of medicinal products
25 February 2016 EMA/CHMP/50549/2015 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular safety profile of medicinal products Draft agreed by Cardiovascular
More informationDraft Accreditation Report for consultation
Guidance producer: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Care Considerations Working Group Guidance product: Diagnosis and Management of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy guideline Date: 24 June 2011 Draft Accreditation
More information1. INTRODUCTION 2. HOARDING PROCEDURE
London Borough of Bromley Hoarding Panel Protocol Procedure No: 5 Summary: Guidance to LBB staff on the procedure for referrals for the multi-agency Hoarding Panel to manage complex risks to individuals
More informationAnnotations to the provisional agenda
Technology Executive Committee 29 August 2017 Fifteenth meeting Bonn, Germany, 12 15 September 2017 Annotations to the provisional agenda 1. Opening of the meeting 1. The Chair of the Technology Executive
More informationGoverning Body (Public) Meeting
ENCLOSURE: T Agenda Item: 86/13 Governing Body (Public) Meeting DATE: 25 July 2013 Title Recommended action for the Governing Body Expanding the Treatment Access Policy for Bexley That the Governing Body:
More informationHow to weigh the strength of prior information and clarify the expected level of evidence?
How to weigh the strength of prior information and clarify the expected level of evidence? Martin Posch martin.posch@meduniwien.ac.at joint work with Gerald Hlavin Franz König Christoph Male Peter Bauer
More informationNational Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme
National Diabetes Treatment and Care Programme Introduction to and supporting documentation for VALUE BASED TRANSFORMATION FUNDING SITE SELECTION December 2016 1 Introduction and Contents The Planning
More informationcodex alimentarius commission
codex alimentarius commission FOOD AND AGRICULTURE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS JOINT OFFICE: Via delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome Tel.: 39.06.57051 Telex: 625825-625853
More informationNational Cancer Peer Review Programme. Radiotherapy Service Evidence Guide
National Cancer Peer Review Programme Radiotherapy Service Evidence Guide Forward This evidence guide has been formulated to assist organisations in preparing for peer review. The contents of this guide
More informationmaking a referral for breast imaging Standard Operating Procedure
Document Control Title Reporting Radiographer Author Directorate Surgery Date Version Issued 0.1 May 2016 Status Draft Author s job title Reporting Radiographer Department Breast Imaging Comment / Changes
More informationInvestigator Initiated Study Proposal Form
Please submit completed form to IISReview@KCI1.com Date Submitted Name & Title Institution Address Phone Number Email Address Principal Investigator / Institution YES NO Multi Center Study Acelity Product(s)
More informationConsumer confidence and food risk analysis. Professor Lynn Frewer Food Safety and Consumer Behaviour University of Wageningen, The Netherlands
Consumer confidence and food risk analysis. Professor Lynn Frewer Food Safety and Consumer Behaviour University of Wageningen, The Netherlands Public Perceptions of Risk and Safety The key questions that
More informationReview of Medicines Act 1968: informal consultation on issues relating to the PLR regime and homeopathy
Review of Medicines Act 1968: informal consultation on issues relating to the PLR regime and homeopathy Introduction 1. The consolidation and review of the UK medicines legislation (including the Medicines
More informationBritish Fertility Society. Clinical guidelines
Guidance producer: British Fertility Society Guidance Product: Clinical guidelines Date: 13 January 2011 Final Accreditation Report Contents Introduction... 3 Accreditation recommendation... 3 Reapplication
More informationHealth care guidelines, recommendations, care pathways
II European Reference Network Conference From planning to implementation Lisbon, 8-9 October 2015 Health care guidelines, recommendations, care pathways Paola Laricchiuta National Centre for Rare Diseases
More informationEuropean Medicines Enforcement Network
Safeguarding public health European Medicines Enforcement Network 14 th ICDRA, Singapore December 2010 Nimo Ahmed Head of Intelligence Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Outline MHRA Enforcement
More informationADPH Sector-Led-Improvement (SLI) Annual report template
ADPH Sector-Led-Improvement (SLI) Annual report template Annual report NB: All completed reports will be circulated among the network SLI leads as sharing good practice. Network Cheshire and Merseyside
More informationUpdated Activity Work Plan : Drug and Alcohol Treatment
Web Version HPRM DOC/17/1043 Updated Activity Work Plan 2016-2019: Drug and Alcohol Treatment This Drug and Alcohol Treatment Activity Work Plan template has the following parts: 1. The updated strategic
More informationTransforming educational provision for children and young people with autism using the Autism Education Trust Materials and Training Programme
Transforming educational provision for children and young people with autism using the Autism Education Trust Materials and Training Programme Pam Simpson and the Communication and Autism Team, Birmingham,
More informationResponse to European Commission report on the Paediatric Regulation: consultation document
Response to European Commission report on the Paediatric Regulation: consultation document Introduction February 2017 1 The Nuffield Council on Bioethics is an independent UK body that examines and reports
More informationEMEA PANDEMIC INFLUENZA CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EVALUATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PANDEMIC INFLUENZA VACCINES AND ANTIVIRALS
European Medicines Agency London, 21 August 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/214301/2006 EMEA PANDEMIC INFLUENZA CRISIS MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EVALUATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PANDEMIC INFLUENZA VACCINES AND ANTIVIRALS
More informationPrimary Health Networks
Primary Health Networks Drug and Alcohol Treatment Activity Work Plan 2016-17 to 2018-19 South Eastern Melbourne PHN When submitting this Activity Work Plan 2016-2018 to the Department of Health, the PHN
More informationAlliance Diagnostic Hub for NEL. Cancer Collaborative Annual Review event
Alliance Diagnostic Hub for NEL Cancer Collaborative Annual Review event 26 th June 2018 There are clear national priorities for provision of Cancer Services National Context The Five Year Forward View,
More informationReflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular risk of medicinal products for the treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases Draft
1 2 3 21 May 2015 EMA/CHMP/50549/2015 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on assessment of cardiovascular risk of medicinal products for the treatment of cardiovascular
More informationCore Standard 24. Cass Sandmann Emergency Planning Officer. Pat Fields Executive Director for Pandemic Flu Planning
Trust Board Meeting Agenda Item 7 Date: 30 September 2009 Title of Report Recommendations (please outline the purpose of the report and the key issues for consideration/decision) Progress with Pandemic
More informationA PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY RESEARCH DESIGN SERVICE NORTH WEST. November 2011 Version 2.0
A PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT STRATEGY RESEARCH DESIGN SERVICE NORTH WEST November 2011 Version 2.0 Page 1 of 8 Our aim The overall aim of the NIHR Research Design Service North West (NIHR RDS NW) in
More informationTitle 1 Descriptive title identifying the study design, population, interventions, and, if applicable, trial acronym
SPIRIT 2013 Checklist: Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents* Section/item Item No Description Addressed on page number Administrative information Title 1 Descriptive
More informationWorking with Childminders and Childminder Agencies. Forming effective partnership models Action for Children
Working with Childminders and Childminder Agencies Forming effective partnership models Action for Children Agenda 10.00 Arrival, refreshments and networking 10.30 Welcome 10.45 DfE update 11.15 Childcare
More informationRoyal College of Physicians (RCP) National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. Final Accreditation Report. Guidance producer: Guidance product:
Guidance producer: Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Guidance product: National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Date: 29 June 2010 Final Accreditation Report Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Implementation...
More informationHigher National Unit specification: general information. Graded Unit 1
Higher National Unit specification: general information This Graded Unit has been validated as part of the HNC/HND Care and Administrative Practice. Centres are required to develop the assessment instrument
More informationCase scenarios: Patient Group Directions
Putting NICE guidance into practice Case scenarios: Patient Group Directions Implementing the NICE guidance on Patient Group Directions (MPG2) Published: March 2014 [updated March 2017] These case scenarios
More informationHead and Neck Cancer MCN Work Plan 2017/18
Head and Neck Cancer MCN Work Plan /18 Objective Deliverables / Outcomes Lead 1. Manage the development/review of Head and Neck Cancer Management Guidelines and Clinical Guidance Documents. 1.1 Identify
More informationSTANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Research Department STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP Number C117 Version Number 1.3 Effective Date Author Anna Leesley Angela Pinder Related SOPs C108: Sponsorship C109: Code Break B131: Monitoring of
More informationChildren s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB
Page: 1 of 5 I. PURPOSE II. III. IV. To provide guidance on the types of research activities that are subject to review and approval by the Committees for the Protection of Human, which comprise the Institutional
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS NATIONAL GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE (GLP) COMPLIANCE MONITORING AUTHORITY
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NATIONAL GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE (GLP) COMPLIANCE MONITORING AUTHORITY FOR OBTAINING AND MAINTAINING ITS GLP CERTIFICATION BY A TEST FACILITY Document No.GLP-101 Version/Issue
More informationEU Regulatory Update & GMP Deficiencies. Bryan J Wright July 2017
EU Regulatory Update & GMP Deficiencies Bryan J Wright July 2017 Slide 1 PharmOut 2017 Outline Update on changes in EU GMP Guide Summary of GMP changes to the Guide Important details of changes over the
More informationSolihull Safeguarding Adults Board & Sub-committees
Solihull Safeguarding Adults Board & Sub-committees 2016 Safeguarding Adults Board Solihull Safeguarding Adults Board [SSAB or the Board] was established in 2008. It is a multi-agency partnership comprising
More informationT his article is based on a recent report from
62 EFFECTIVENESS BULLETIN A systematic review of cancer waiting time audits R Lewis, R Collins, A Flynn, M Emmans Dean, L Myers, P Wilson, A Eastwood... A summary of a systematic review of clinical audits
More informationHow Might Medicinal Regulators Evolve in their Expectations for ENDS? David M Graham Chief Impact Officer - NJOY
How Might Medicinal Regulators Evolve in their Expectations for ENDS? David M Graham Chief Impact Officer - NJOY 4 Years Ago The Regulation of Nicotine-Containing Products Jeremy Mean 2015 The fact that
More informationPrimary Health Networks Greater Choice for At Home Palliative Care
Primary Health Networks Greater Choice for At Home Palliative Care Brisbane South PHN When submitting the Greater Choice for At Home Palliative Care Activity Work Plan 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 to the Department
More informationGuidance for the Network Review of Chemotherapy Errors
Guidance for the Network Review of Chemotherapy Errors For approvals and version control see Document Management Record on page 8 Doc Ref: AngCN-CCG-C31 Approved and published: March 2013 Page 1 of 8 Table
More informationBevacizumab added to a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Appendix I Bevacizumab added to a taxane for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) provide a unique perspective on the technology, which is not typically available
More informationST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014 1. Introduction The St. Michael s Hospital (SMH) REB
More informationGuideline on the evaluation of medicinal products indicated for treatment of bacterial infections (CPMP/EWP/558/95 rev 2)
Reflections on the methodological issues associated with the CHMP guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products indicated for treatment of bacterial infections Dr David Wright Contents Guideline on
More informationAudit Report. National Audit of Paediatric Radiology Services in Hospitals
Audit Report National Audit of Paediatric Radiology Services in Hospitals www.rcr.ac.uk 2 Contents Introduction 3 Standards 4 Material and methods 5 Results 6 Discussion 8 References 10 www.rcr.ac.uk 3
More informationProject Initiation Document:
Project Initiation Document: Lancashire Support Services for Children, Young People, Families and Carers Affected by Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Diagnosis 1. Background The Children and Young
More information