Peter G. Shields, MD Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) August 16, 2013
|
|
- Ruth Sanders
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Peter G. Shields, MD Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) August 16, 2013
2 Conceptual Framework for Evaluating MRTPs: Objectives Provide a framework for evaluating all tobacco products that includes MRTPs Improve the public health related to tobacco products, and prevent a worsening of it Prevent unwarranted health claims Minimize consumer misperception Provide an early warning for unintended consequences for MRTPs Identify research gaps for evaluating tobacco products 2
3 Weight of Scientific Evidence Review Evaluation of claims and data that is evidence-based, using causation-type criteria in the context of health claims Qualitative final assessment Quantitative weighting and criteria to be decided Considers all studies and data conducted and disclosed Needs to be developed for MRTPs 3
4 Risk Assessment 4 Quantitative estimate for the reduction in risk for individuals and general population Accounts for delayed quitting, new users, relapse Accounts for a heterogeneous population Assesses specific disease outcomes, and competing risks (e.g., trading one disease for another) Assesses overall morbidity and mortality Determines both the quantitative linkage of tobacco toxicant exposure to disease and a reverse-dose response relationship 4
5 5
6 Even the best-designed observational studies cannot establish cause and effect between an intervention and an outcome... However, because cross-sectional studies measure the exposure to the substance and the disease risk at the same time, they cannot establish... a cause and effect relationship. Randomized, controlled intervention studies provide the strongest evidence of whether or not there is a relationship between a substance and a reduced risk of a disease.... For these reasons, such studies can provide convincing evidence of a cause and effect relationship between an intervention and an outcome. 6
7 Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example. O'Connor RJ, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Cigarette filter-based assays as proxies for toxicant exposure and smoking behavior--a literature review. Pauly JL, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco. Johnson MD, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies. Marian C, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods. Rees VW, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Methods used in internal industry clinical trials to assess tobacco risk reduction. Rees VW, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12): Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products. Hatsukami DK, et al., CEBP 2009 Dec;18(12):
8 Theoretical Outcomes of MRTP Use in Individuals Hypothesis: Cancer risk depends on the determinants of the slope for the dose-response curve. Assumption: MRTPs Determinants reduce smoke of slope exposure enough to affect risk (but not proven as of today), which is MRTP antagonistic type and to inherent characteristics dangers of the MRTP; risk remains mostly dependent on conventional Age at change cigarette use. Assumption: For Perception illustration and purposes acceptance only, the slope of the dose-response curve is linear. Nicotine dependence Personality traits Gender Dual use: same smoking and MRTP Cancer Risk in Users MRTP use begins Same smoking; No MRTP Dual use: Lesser smoking and MRTP MRTP only Complete cessation Duration of Use 8
9 Theoretical Outcome of MRTP Use in the Population Hypothesis: Cancer incidence depends on the determinants of the slope. Determinants of slope Assumption: MRTP meaningfully reduces smoke exposure and affects population use. Delayed cessation Increased initiation Reuptake in former smokers MRTP type Perception and acceptance Change in cancer incidence MRTP use becomes widespread in population Time Dual Use: Same smoking and MRTP Same smoking; No MRTP Lesser smoking and MRTP Lesser smoking without MRTP Complete cessation 9
10 Risk Reduction: How much is enough How much risk is acceptable? 2x 5x 10x Smoker Disease Risk Never Smoker How much risk reduction Complete Cessation is measurable, and acceptable? Complete Cessation Lifetime Exposure The only known way to reduce risk for tobacco products is complete cessation 10
11 The Risk Continuum and Risk Reduction Smoker Disease Risk Never Smoker MRTP Measurable NOT Risk Measurable Reduction Risk Reduction Age Complete Cessation The only known way to reduce risk for tobacco products is complete cessation 11
12 Tobacco and Lung Cancer Mortality Dose Response Models in Humans: Literature Summary Relative Risk Cigarettes/Day Puntoni, et. al., Carcinogenesis 16:1465,
13 Tobacco and Lung Cancer Mortality Dose Response Models in Humans: Literature Summary Relative Risk Cigarettes/Day Puntoni, et. al., Carcinogenesis 16:1465,
14 Effect of Smoking Reduction on Lung Cancer Risk HR=0.73 ( ) HR=Hazard Ratio HR=0.50 HR=0.44 ( ) ( )) HR=0.17 ( ) HR=0.09 ( ) 31 year follow-up for 3 prospective cohorts in Copenhagen (N=19714) Godtfredsen, et al. Jama 294: 1505,
15 All Cause Mortality 15
16 Tools Available to Assess Tobacco Products Laboratory Smoking Machine Methods Smoke chemistry analysis In vitro assays In vivo experimental animal studies Human studies Clinical trials, e.g., switching studies Cross-sectional studies Cohort studies Interventional trials for disease outcomes 16
17 Extrapolating Laboratory Data???? 17
18 Smoking Machine Profiles: What about inhalation? Dixon and Derrick, BAT, 1986; Bates:
19 FTC rescinds 1966 FTC Guidance for measuring tar and nicotine yields for advertising Today, there are no accepted smoking machine puff profiles Optimizing machine puffing regimens Yield per mg nicotine Cross-regimen comparisons: match puffing regimens to human smoking behavior Puff topography matched to a particular product, modeling a variety of smokers Adjust machine parameters to match a nicotine yield, e.g., lower FTC nicotine yield cigarettes are smoked more intensely (Kozlowski & O Connor, 2000; Hammond, et al 2007) Measuring tar and nicotine yields is misleading as not all tars are the same 19
20 Challenges and questions for clinical trials: Experimental designs Primary goals, study design, duration, control group Subject recruitment Methods and inclusion/exclusion criteria Subject characteristics Generalizability to smokers Subject retention Methods, characteristics of drop-outs and retainers Compliance Outcomes: Use and biomarkers 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 The Spectrum of Biomarkers External Exposure Exposure Biomarkers Biologically Effective Dose Biomarkers of Harm Outcome Surrogate marker in target tissue External Exposure Assessment Target tissue Internal Dose Target tissue Biologically Effective Dose Target tissue Early biological And genetic effects Target tissue Changes in morphology, structure and function Disease Marker in surrogate tissue Effect modification by host factors 24
25 Hecht biomarkers and lung cancer 25
26 Tobacco Product Assessment Framework Pre-Market Evaluation Comparison with Conventional Products and Reference Cigarettes Product design analysis Chemical analysis (tobacco and smoke) In Vitro cell culture and in vivo animal testing Human Testing perception, use, exposure and biomarkers If no claims are ever made If claims are anticipated Pre-Claims Scientific Evaluation (Pre or Post-Market) Comparison with Conventional Products and Other MRTPs Human trials and/or epidemiology (e.g., cross-sectional, cohort) Consumer use and perception studies Biomarkers for different disease outcomes Assess population and individual heterogeneity Weight of scientific evidence and risk assessment Post-Market Activities Surveillance and consumer use Claims and messaging evaluation Epidemiology and intervention trials linked to clinical outcomes Monitoring and Re-evaluation Assess product design changes Re-evaluate evaluation based upon post-market activities Repeat laboratory and human studies 26
27 Pre-Market Evaluation Product evaluation goal: How does the tobacco product compare with similar conventional and reference products, and does it result in more, less or different toxicant exposure than those products? Design Feature Analysis Design features (tobacco, filter, vent, draw) Reverse engineering unique features Consider additives and delivery mechanism and Chemical/Toxicological Analysis Tobacco constituent analysis Smoke Chemistry Emissions Testing In Vitro and In Vivo Testing (>2 smoking machine conditions, e.g., HC and human puff profiles) Substantial increase - Yes Substantial increase - Yes Stop Stop and Limited Human Testing Consumer Use and Beliefs Human Exposure Testing (Sensory perception, topography, biomarkers) Substantial increase - Yes Stop 27
28 Pre-Claims Scientific Evaluation Product evaluation goal: Does the product substantially reduce exposure in human studies relating to different disease outcomes that link to individual risk and population harm reduction when compared with conventional products and/or other MRTPs? Human Clinical Trials Long-term randomized switching studies, accounting for compensation Consumer use, perception and abuse liability measures Claims evaluation Biomarkers and Topography Adverse Events and Epidemiology For Products Already On the Market Cross-Sectional, and/or Cohort Studies Consumer use and perception measures Impact of product on cessation, initiation and re-uptake Biomarkers and Topography Assess Population and Individual Heterogeneity and Weight of Scientific Evidence Review and Risk Assessment Substantial decrease - No Substantial decrease - No Substantial decrease - No Substantial decrease - No Stop Stop Stop Stop and Health Claims and Product Messaging Evaluation Focus groups, clinical trials, test marketing Substantial decrease - No Stop 28 28
29 Post-Market Activities Product evaluation goal: Does the product adversely affect consumer use (e.g., initiation, intensity or cessation),, biomarkers and health outcomes on an individual and population basis? Population-wide Surveillance Consumer use and perceptions Impact of product on use, cessation, initiation and re-uptake Health claims and product messaging evaluation Assess population heterogeneity and Epidemiology Cross-Sectional and Cohort Studies Impact of product on use, cessation, initiation and re-uptake Health claims and product messaging evaluation Biomarkers and topography Assess disease outcomes Assess heterogeneity and Intervention Studies For Disease Outcomes If claims are made about disease outcomes Substantial decrease - No Substantial decrease - No Substantial decrease - No Stop Stop Stop 29
30 Pitfalls for implementing a Conceptual Framework that is not validated or correctly validated: Worsening public health False sense of security Widespread use of a product that is no different or worse, and/or maintains per capita tobacco use Consumer misperception Create disincentives for real change because of testing and minimal acceptable change guidelines Misdirected innovation for change evaluatiosn Appearance of government or academia endorsement of tobacco use Appearance of a tobacco industry partnership with government or academia 30
31 Thank you 31
Providing a Science Base for the Evaluation of. Tobacco Products
Providing a Science Base for the Evaluation of Tobacco Products Peter G. Shields MD, Greg Connolly DMD,MPH, K. Michael Cummings PhD, Mirjana V. Djordjevic PhD, Dorothy K. Hatsukami PhD, Jack E. Henningfield
More informationTobacco-related risk perceptions in the regulation of tobacco products at the FDA Center for Tobacco Products
Tobacco-related risk perceptions in the regulation of tobacco products at the FDA Center for Tobacco Products David B. Portnoy, PhD, MPH Conrad J. Choiniere, PhD Office of Science FDA, Center for Tobacco
More informationThere is no such thing as a safe cigarette, and no safe level of exposure to the carcinogens or other toxic substances contained in tobacco smoke.
POSITION STATEMENT Dangers of reduced-harm cigarettes Smokers considering changing to so-called reduced harm cigarettes should not conclude that these products are a less harmful alternative Key messages
More informationTobacco Packages: Ads for tobacco companies or tools for public health?
Tobacco Packages: Ads for tobacco companies or tools for public health? Heather Selin Tobacco Control Advisor, PAHO/WHO 2005 The Importance of the Package To tobacco companies: Critical link between ads
More informationAN UPDATE ON FDA S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON TOBACCO AND NICOTINE
AN UPDATE ON FDA S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON TOBACCO AND NICOTINE Mitch Zeller, J.D. Director, FDA May 3, 2018 CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS HOW CAN WE MAKE THE GREATEST IMPACT? We truly find ourselves at a
More informationCommunicating the Risk of Nicotine Delivery Products
Communicating the Risk of Nicotine Delivery Products August 10, 2014 ACS National Meeting Jim Solyst June 24, 2014 1 Nicotine Background Key Points The popularity of e-cigarettes has increased the need
More informationReframing the E-cigarette Debate To Address Genuine Harm Reduction
Reframing the E-cigarette Debate To Address Genuine Harm Reduction Michael J. Thun, M.D., M.S. National Tobacco Control Conference Washington DC December 2, 2014 Debates over regulation of E-cigarettes
More informationRationale for Establishing Tobacco Product Regulation
Rationale for Establishing Tobacco Product Regulation Erik Dybing, MD, PhD Conference of the Parties Technical Briefing Geneva, 7 February 2006 WHO Strategy for Tobacco Control Preventing uptake of tobacco
More informationPredicting the population health effects of changing tobacco exposures: Statistical models for regulatory compliance
Predicting the population health effects of changing tobacco exposures: Statistical models for regulatory compliance NASEM ENDS Workshop February 2017 Annette M. Bachand, Ph.D. Goal of Statistical Models:
More informationRegulatory Support for Tobacco Products. Feeling daunted by the regulatory process for tobacco products? Don t worry Battelle can help.
Regulatory Support for Tobacco Products Feeling daunted by the regulatory process for tobacco products? Don t worry Battelle can help. PREMARKET TOBACCO (PMTA) HUMAN FACTORS STUDIES SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
More informationModeling the Population Health Effects of Camel Snus with Reduced Risk Information
Modeling the Population Health Effects of Camel Snus with Reduced Risk Information Geoffrey Curtin, Ph.D. - RAI Services Company Annette Bachand, Ph.D., Sandra Sulsky, Ph.D. - Ramboll Environ; Saul Shiffman,
More informationMODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCT MARKETING DECISIONS
MODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCT MARKETING DECISIONS Presented by David Ashley, Ph.D. Rear Admiral (retired), US Public Health Service Director, Office of Science, CTP, FDA Disclaimer: This is not a formal
More informationTOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?
TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT? Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, MD Deputy Director Division of Individual Health Science Office of Science, CTP Grail Sipes, JD Director Office of Regulatory Policy, CDER Disclaimer:
More informationMenthol Cigarette Report
Menthol Cigarette Report Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting July 15, 2010 Corinne G. Husten, MD, MPH Senior Medical Advisor Center for Tobacco Products, FDA 1 Menthol Cigarette Report
More informationDissolvable Tobacco Products
Dissolvable Tobacco Products James E. Dillard Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Altria Client Services 1 l Altria Client Services (on behalf of PM USA and USSTC) I Presentation to the Tobacco Products
More informationModified Risk Tobacco Product Applications A Succinct ENDS Industry Perspective
Modified Risk Tobacco Product Applications A Succinct ENDS Industry Perspective Patricia I. Kovacevic General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer Presentation to the Food and Drug Law Institute Tobacco Conference,
More informationHow to Regulate E-Cigarettes? Are we asking the right questions?
How to Regulate E-Cigarettes? Are we asking the right questions? Eric N. Lindblom Director, Tobacco Control and Food & Drug Law O Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law Georgetown University
More informationFDA Center for Tobacco Products: Tobacco Research and the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study
FDA Center for Tobacco Products: Tobacco Research and the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Regulatory Public Laws Compliance & Education Policies Science & Enforcement & Communications
More informationSmoking Behaviour Sub-Group (TSB)
Smoking Behaviour Sub-Group (TSB) 2016 Annual Report Coordinator: Secretary: SC Liaison: Dr Krishna Prasad (BAT) Dr Xavier Cahours (ITG) Dr Martin Blumenstock (BAT) 11 October 2016 Berlin, Germany TSB
More informationWHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control When WHO was established in 1948, its Member States incorporated the power to negotiate treaties into its Constitution. This power remained dormant until 1996,
More informationUPDATE ON PREMARKET TOBACCO PRODUCT AUTHORIZATION PATHWAY
UPDATE ON PREMARKET TOBACCO PRODUCT AUTHORIZATION PATHWAY Presented by Ii-Lun Chen, M.D Director Division of Individual Health Science Office of Science, CTP, FDA Disclaimer: This is not a formal dissemination
More informationSubmission to FDA on the MRTP application of Swedish Match Docket: FDA 2014 N November 2014
Submission to FDA on the MRTP application of Swedish Match Docket: FDA 2014 N 1051 18 November 2014 Professor Tony Axéll Mr Clive Bates Professor Ron Borland Professor John Britton Professor Jean François
More informationCOMMENT PREPARED AFTER THE TPSAC MEETIING ON CAMEL SNUS. significantly reduce harm to individuals or benefit population health.
COMMENT PREPARED AFTER THE TPSAC MEETIING ON CAMEL SNUS RJR failed to demonstrate that Camel Snus, as actually used by consumers, will significantly reduce harm to individuals or benefit population health.
More informationAssessing Consumer Responses to RRP: Experience at PMI in Developing Fit-for-Purpose Self-Report Instruments
Assessing Consumer Responses to RRP: Experience at PMI in Developing Fit-for-Purpose Self-Report Instruments C. Chrea, E. Spies, E. Afolalu, N. Mainy, S. Gallot, P. Binggeli, E. Clerc, R. Weitkunat PMI
More informationRE: Docket No. FDA-2014-N , Electronic Cigarettes and the Public Health
VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION June 30, 2015 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 RE: Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1936-0001, Electronic
More informationconsistent with the industry documents we note in our September letter.
February 18, 2010 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 RE: Docket Number FDA-2010-N-0020
More informationTobacco Surveillance in the United States
Tobacco Surveillance in the United States Gary Giovino Roswell Park Cancer Institute National Conference on Tobacco OR Health Boston, Massachusetts December 10, 2003 Outline of Presentation Public health
More informationTobacco Surveillance in the United States
Tobacco Surveillance in the United States Gary Giovino Roswell Park Cancer Institute National Conference on Tobacco OR Health San Francisco, California November 20, 2002 Outline of Presentation Public
More informationProduct Standards for Reducing Nicotine in Cigarettes
Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products (U54 DA031659). The content is solely the
More informationThe concept that not all tobacco and nicotine products
A Model Risk Continuum for Tobacco and Nicotine Products by Chris Proctor, Sudhanshu Patwardhan, and James Murphy The concept that not all tobacco and nicotine products present the same risks to human
More informationProblem Which option Additional option Additional comments definition Yes No change No further observations.
Department of Health, United Kingdom electronic contribution rec. 317 - by Mr Lee McGill lee.mcgill@dh.gsi.gov.uk Question 1 - scope Problem Which option Recommend option Additional comments Yes No change
More informationFDLI Annual Conference
FDLI Annual Conference Panel Tobacco Harm Reduction: Opportunities & Regulatory Pathways to Achieve May 5, 2017 Joe Murillo Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Altria Client Services Panel Discussion at
More informationMitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association
Regulatory Public Laws Compliance & Education Policies Science & Enforcement & Communications The FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Its Role in Reducing Tobacco Use Mitch Zeller, Director, Center
More informationLow-Nitrosamine Dissolvable Tobacco Products Star Scientific, Inc. Part III Initiation and Cessation
Low-Nitrosamine Dissolvable Tobacco Products Star Scientific, Inc. Part III Initiation and Cessation Using science to reduce tobacco-related harm at every level of the population 1 Summary - Parts I &
More informationHOPE OR HAZARD? What Research Tells Us About Potentially Reduced-Exposure Tobacco Products
HOPE OR HAZARD? What Research Tells Us About Potentially Reduced-Exposure Tobacco Products Hope or Hazard? What Research Tells Us About Potentially Reduced-Exposure Tobacco Products. TABLE TABLE OF OF
More informationShould FDA try to move smokers to e-cigarettes or other less harmful tobacco-nicotine products and, if so, how?
Should FDA try to move smokers to e-cigarettes or other less harmful tobacco-nicotine products and, if so, how? Jeff Weiss General Counsel/EVP of Gov. Affairs of NJOY, LLC FDLI - October 20, 2017 FDA s
More informationHeat-not-Burn Products: Scientific Assessment of Risk Reduction
Heat-not-Burn Products: Scientific Assessment of Risk Reduction Tobacco Merchants Association 2015 Annual Meeting Moira Gilchrist PhD Philip Morris International R&D May 20th 2015 The Objective is Harm
More informationExecutive Summary. No Fire, No Smoke: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018
Executive Summary Executive Summary No Fire, No Smoke: The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction 2018 3 The GSTHR report maps for the first time the global, regional and national availability and use
More informationRJ Reynolds Topic List
RJ Reynolds Topic List ADVERTISEMENTS AMMONIA USE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION/BY-LAWS BILLBOARD PLACEMENT LOCATION BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF CIGARETTES BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH DIVISION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS
More informationUNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS. Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products
UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products May 24, 2016 OVERVIEW OF TODAY S PRESENTATION Highlights of the Deeming Final Rule
More informationReduced Risk Review March Keith Lenghaus
Reduced Risk Review March 2005 Keith Lenghaus Reducing Exposure Add filters (1950s) Rapid gain in market share Reduce tar, nicotine (1960s on) FTC method Competitive advantage Advertising Pollay et al
More informationCigarettes cause cancer. Tobacco contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive drug.
Q: Does nicotine cause cancer? Cigarettes cause cancer. Tobacco contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive drug. These facts make a lot of people nervous about nicotine. But it is NOT the nicotine in
More informationThe importance of offering adult smokers a portfolio of potentially less harmful products
The importance of offering adult smokers a portfolio of potentially less harmful products International Symposium on Nicotine Technology June 15 th 2017 Thomas Mc Grath, PhD PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products
More informationModelling the effects of user exposure to harmful emissions across the spectrum of nicotine delivery
Global Nicotine Forum 2018 Modelling the effects of user exposure to harmful emissions across the spectrum of nicotine delivery Ed Stephens University of St Andrews Declaration: No conflicts of interest
More informationLung Cancer Epidemiology & Prevention. A/Prof Fraser Brims
Lung Cancer Epidemiology & Prevention A/Prof Fraser Brims Introduction Lung cancer burden Global, Australia, WA Current smoking rates Other risks and associations Prevention Tobacco control E-cigarettes
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA KENNETH KNIGHT IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Between: KENNETH KNIGHT Plaintiff AND: IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED Defendant Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996,
More informationDRAFT FOR COMMENT ( ) All Tobacco Products are Deadly and Addictive: Product Diversity Challenges Regulation and Communication
DRAFT FOR COMMENT (24.01.06) All Tobacco Products are Deadly and Addictive: Product Diversity Challenges Regulation and Communication Jack E. Henningfield, PhD Conference of the Parties Technical Briefing
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1 P age
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) is the global standard for systematically monitoring adult tobacco use (smoking and smokeless) and tracking key tobacco control indicators. GATS
More informationElectronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Surveillance in the United States
Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Surveillance in the United States Brian King, PhD, MPH Deputy Director for Research Translation (Acting) Office on Smoking and Health Centers for Disease Control
More informationTMA Annual Conference, Williamsburg, May 20-22, Public Health. The Swedish Experience
TMA Annual Conference, Williamsburg, May 20-22, 2012 Effects of Snus Use on Public Health The Swedish Experience Lars M. Ramström PhD Director, Institute for Tobacco Studies Stockholm, Sweden Email: lars.ramstrom@tobaccostudies.com
More informationEpidemiology of Hardcore Smoking: The Need to Advance the Field
Epidemiology of Hardcore Smoking: The Need to Advance the Field Gary A. Giovino, Ph.D Transdisciplinary Classification of Hardcore Smokers: How Shall We Define Hardcore? Symposium 10 th Annual Meeting
More informationCountry profile. Myanmar
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Myanmar WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 23 October 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationElectronic cigarettes: A new era for tobacco harm reduction Adapted for SW Specialist Nurses for Children in Care meeting 17 January 2017
Electronic cigarettes: A new era for tobacco harm reduction Adapted for SW Specialist Nurses for Children in Care meeting 17 January 2017 Russ Moody Health & Wellbeing Programme Lead Public Health England
More informationCountry profile. Nepal
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Nepal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 3 December 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationGeoffrey T. Fong, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of Waterloo and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Perceptions of Health Warnings in China: Survey and experimental evidence from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (the ITC Project) Geoffrey T. Fong, Ph.D. Department of Psychology
More informationAssessment of the Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, A Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: From Concept to Early Clinical Data
Assessment of the Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, A Candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product: From Concept to Early Clinical Data Global Forum on Nicotine 2015 Bruce D. Clark PhD Philip Morris International
More informationNicotine Reduction Workshop Role of nicotine in smoking behaviour
Nicotine Reduction Workshop Role of nicotine in smoking behaviour Derek Mariner APSTW02 11 October 2016 2016 CORESTA Congress, Berlin, Germany, 9-13 October 2016 Introduction Nicotine itself is not especially
More informationCigarette Packaging in Ireland: The Plain Future.
http://www.cit.ie Cigarette Packaging in Ireland: The Plain Future. Wesley Connolly Tong and Maurice Murphy New Laws in Ireland Ireland has become the first country in Europe and the second in the world
More informationE-Cigarettes: Current Perspective
E-Cigarettes: Current Perspective Aruni Bhatnagar, Ph.D. Professor of Medicine University of Louisville Louisville, KY Electronic Cigarettes E-cigarettes are electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS),
More informationTobacco Surveillance and Evaluation: An Update
Tobacco Surveillance and Evaluation: An Update Gary A. Giovino, PhD, MS University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions Overview! Conceptual models of surveillance/evaluation! Relevant
More informationWhere We Are: State of Tobacco Control and Prevention
Where We Are: State of Tobacco Control and Prevention Corinne Husten, MD, MPH Acting Director CDC Office on Smoking and Health Nova Scotia, Canada October 2006 Tobacco Impact Background Tobacco is leading
More informationCountry profile. Timor-Leste
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Timor-Leste WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 May 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationRecent Findings from the ITC Project on the Effectiveness of Health Warnings in the Asia Pacific Region
Recent Findings from the ITC Project on the Effectiveness of Health Warnings in the Asia Pacific Region Geoffrey T. Fong, Ph.D. University of Waterloo and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Tobacco
More informationPrepared by: David Hammond Department of Health Studies University of Waterloo
Prepared by: David Hammond Department of Health Studies University of Waterloo February 2009 2 This chapter is taken from the Tobacco labelling and packaging toolkit. A complete copy of this toolkit and
More informationFDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality
FDA s Action Agenda to Reduce Tobacco Related-Cancer Incidence and Mortality Lawrence Deyton, M.S.P.H., M.D. Director, FDA Center for Tobacco Products June 11, 2012 FDA s Vision To make tobaccorelated
More informationE.cigarettes. An alternative to a uniquely deadly product that kills one in two of its regular users? Paul Lambert Public Health, Leeds City Council
E.cigarettes An alternative to a uniquely deadly product that kills one in two of its regular users? Paul Lambert Public Health, Leeds City Council Background First came to market about 10 years ago, with
More informationELECTRONIC CIGARETTES WHAT S THE BOTTOM LINE?
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES WHAT S THE BOTTOM LINE? E-cigarettes have the potential to benefit adult smokers who are not pregnant if used as a complete substitute for regular cigarettes and other smoked tobacco
More informationCountry profile. Angola
Country profile Angola WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationPopulation impacts of snus tobacco initiation and cessation
Population impacts of snus tobacco initiation and cessation Karl Lund, Ph.d Research Director, Tobacco Polarcircle Norway Registered sales of tobacco products in Norway 1909-2014 World war II Cigarettes
More informationCountry profile. Austria
Country profile Austria WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 28 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2005 Socioeconomic context
More informationHeated Tobacco Technology: Science, Behavior and Avoiding Unintended Consequences
Heated Tobacco Technology: Science, Behavior and Avoiding Unintended Consequences Global Forum on Nicotine 2017 Moira Gilchrist PhD Philip Morris International June 16th 2017 Important Information Reduced-Risk
More informationCountry profile. Republic of Moldova
Country profile Republic of Moldova WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 February 2009 Socioeconomic
More informationCountry profile. Ukraine
Country profile Ukraine WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 June 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationACHIEVING SMOKEFREE AOTEAROA BY2025
ACHIEVING SMOKEFREE AOTEAROA BY2025 Monitoring and evaluation plan CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Logic model 3 Sources of information 4 Monitoring progress towards the SFA 2025 goal 4 System
More informationCountry profile. Gambia. Note: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table.
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011 Country profile Gambia te: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table. WHO Framework Convention
More informationUsing evidence to negotiate new policies on harm reduction
Using evidence to negotiate new policies on harm reduction Linda Bauld With thanks to Ann McNeill, Hazel Cheeseman, Diane Dixon, Robert West & Martin Dockrell Outline UK guidance on tobacco harm reduction:
More informationFDA S CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS: AN UPDATE ON REGULATORY ACTIVITIES AND PRIORITIES
FDA S CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS: AN UPDATE ON REGULATORY ACTIVITIES AND PRIORITIES Mitch Zeller, J.D. (Director, FDA CTP) Matthew R. Holman, Ph.D. (Director, Office of Science, FDA CTP) Kathy Crosby
More informationCountry profile. Lebanon
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Lebanon WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 4 March 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationPOSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT
POSSIBLE REVISION OF THE TOBACCO PRODUCTS DIRECTIVE 2001/37/EC DG SANCO 2010 PUBLIC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Answer given by the General Direction of Public Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Social
More informationCountry profile. Cuba
Country profile Cuba WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationE-cigarette consumption and puffing topography data. Dr Sudhanshu Patwardhan FDA CTP Workshop, Hyattsville, Maryland. March 9, 2015.
E-cigarette consumption and puffing topography data Dr Sudhanshu Patwardhan FDA CTP Workshop, Hyattsville, Maryland. March 9, 2015. Outline Nicoventures Introduction Topography and use patterns to inform
More informationCountry profile. Gambia
Country profile Gambia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 18 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationStudy Summary Study THS-PBA-02-US
Page 1 Study Summary Study THS-PBA-02-US Study Title: Sponsor: Qualitative Study to Develop THS 2.2 Hypothetical Product Messages Philip Morris International Management S.A. Avenue de Rhodanie, 50 1007
More informationCountry profile. Senegal
Country profile Senegal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 19 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationDo smokers want to know more about the cigarettes they smoke? Results from the EDUCATE study
Nicotine & Tobacco Research Volume 6, Supplement 3 (December 2004) S289 S302 Do smokers want to know more about the cigarettes they smoke? Results from the EDUCATE study Maansi A. Bansal, K. Michael Cummings,
More informationPublic Health England s Independent Expert E-Cigarettes Evidence Review
Public Health England s Independent Expert E-Cigarettes Evidence Review Misinformation, Misreporting and Public Understanding Ann McNeill Contents 1. PHE e-cigarette evidence updates 2. Public understanding
More informationCountry profile. Poland
Country profile Poland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 14 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Trinidad and Tobago
Country profile Trinidad and Tobago WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 27 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 19 August 2004 Socioeconomic
More informationTowards a Smokefree Generation: A Tobacco Control Plan for England. Tim Baxter, Department of Health, England
Towards a Smokefree Generation: A Tobacco Control Plan for England 1 Tim Baxter, Department of Health, England Smoking rates are falling fast... 25 Adult Smoking prevalence in England (daily and non daily)
More informationA proposed bridging approach for the assessment of novel tobacco products
A proposed bridging approach for the assessment of novel tobacco products Dr. Ian M. Fearon British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited R&D Centre Southampton, U.K. Agenda Insight into BAT R&D Evolution
More informationCountry profile. Bahrain. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007
Country profile Bahrain WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationThe Economics of Smoking
The Economics of Smoking One of the potential problems (from an economic perspective) with smoking is that there may be an externality in consumption, so there may be difference between the private and
More informationCountry profile. Hungary
Country profile Hungary WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 April 2004 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Turkmenistan. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011
Country profile Turkmenistan WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationDECISION. Recalling further its decision FCTC/COP5(6) to adopt further partial guidelines;
66 Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Seventh session Delhi, India, 7 12 November 2016 12 November 2016 DECISION FCTC/COP7(14) Further development of the partial
More informationSACTob Position Statement on Nicotine and Its Regulation in Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Products.
SACTob Position Statement on Nicotine and Its Regulation in Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Products. Background Over the past two decades a wealth of research findings have pointed to nicotine as the key pharmacological
More informationCountry profile. Italy
Country profile Italy WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 2 July 2008 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationResponsible Practice in E-Vapour Products (EVP) Product Stewardship
Responsible Practice in E-Vapour Products (EVP) Product Stewardship Tanvir Walele, MSc, ERT 11 October 2016 1 Responsible Practice Responsible practice can be divided in to 3 areas: Pre-market product
More information00:08 For decades our scientists have endeavoured to reduce the risks of tobacco use and continue to do so today. 00:15
00:00 British American Tobacco 00:02 00:03 The Electronic Cigarette 00:07 00:08 For decades our scientists have endeavoured to reduce the risks of tobacco use and continue to do so today. 00:15 00:15 Our
More information