A province can regulate tobacco packaging

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A province can regulate tobacco packaging"

Transcription

1 A province can regulate tobacco packaging Rob Cunningham 1 February 17, 2015 Summary Canadian provinces have a long history of regulating tobacco packaging with measures going beyond federal requirements. There is no legal impediment for a province to regulate tobacco packaging on the basis that the provincial regulation would be more restrictive than federal legislation. There has been no impediment in the past, and there is none today. Introduction Federal regulations require that health warnings cover the top 75% of the front and back of packages of cigarettes and little cigars. There is a minimum warning size of 50% for some other tobacco products, such as roll-your-own tobacco, chewing tobacco and tobacco sticks. A whole series of potential measures are available for provinces to regulate tobacco packaging, even without taking into consideration plain packaging. Such measures include standardizing the package shape/format, banning superslim shaped packages, banning octagonal (8-sided) packages, requiring a minimum size for package warnings, and other measures. While such potential provincial measures would be more restrictive than existing federal legislation, there is longstanding experience of provinces adopting measures going beyond federal legislation. Trend of increased tobacco package regulation There is a continuing international trend towards increased government regulation of tobacco packaging. This trend includes increasing the size of package health warnings, and requiring pictures as part of health warnings. 2 1 Rob Cunningham, BA, LLB, MBA is a lawyer and Senior Policy Analyst for the Canadian Cancer Society. He represented the Canadian Cancer Society as co-counsel in the Quebec Superior Court, the Quebec Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada in the tobacco industry s constitutional challenge to federal tobacco legislation that restricted advertising, banned sponsorships and required picture warnings covering 50% of the package front and back. The Society had intervener status in this constitutional challenge that was ultimately dismissed by a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada. He is also other of the book Smoke & Mirrors: The Canadian Tobacco War, La guerre du tabac: l expérience canadienne. 22 Canadian Cancer Society, Cigarette Package Health Warnings: International Status Report, Fourth Edition, September 2014.

2 2 It is well established that larger, more prominent warnings are more effective. International guidelines adopted under the international tobacco treaty, the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, state that: 7. [ ] Evidence demonstrates that the effectiveness of health warnings and messages increases with their prominence. In comparison with small, text-only health warnings, larger warnings with pictures are more likely to be noticed, better communicate health risks, provoke a greater emotional response and increase the motivation of tobacco users to quit and to decrease their tobacco consumption. 3 There is growing recognition that there should be a minimum size for package warnings (minimum height and minimum width in millimeters) in addition to a minimum percentage of the package front and back. This is in part a response to more recent tobacco industry packaging strategies that reduce the prominence of warnings, such as superslim packages and octagonal packages. On superslim packages, for example, the appearance of the warning is distorted and less visible, and the font size for text becomes very small thus affecting legibility. (There are increasing calls for superslim cigarettes to be banned altogether.) The new European Union (EU) Directive, applying to 28 EU countries, specifies that warnings on cigarette packages must have a minimum height of 44mm, a minimum width of 52mm, as well as a minimum height of 16mm for the lateral side. 4 This is in addition to specifying that warnings must cover at least 65% of the package front and back. 5 The Directive also requires cigarette packages to be cuboid in shape. 6 Australia has minimum cigarette package dimensions, which in turn results in minimum dimensions for warnings. Australia has a minimum package height of 85mm, a minimum width of 20mm, and a minimum height for the lateral side of 20mm. 7 Australia also specifies that the sides of cigarette packages must meet at 90 degree angles, which in effect prohibits beveled edges. 8 More broadly, Australia has required plain packaging. The United Kingdom, Ireland, France and New Zealand are in the process of finalizing plain packaging requirements; Norway and Finland are actively considering plain packaging. 9 Uruguay allows only one brand variant per brand 3 Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Guidelines for implementation of Article 11 (Packaging and labelling of tobacco products) of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, para 7. 4 Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC ( EU Directive ), Art. 9.3, 10.1(g). 5 EU Directive, Art EU Directive, Art Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011, SLI 2011 No. 263 (Australia), in regulation 2.1.1, provide dimensions for packages. In Australia, cigarette package health warnings must cover at least 75% of the package front and 90% of the package back. 8 Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, No. 148, 2011 (Australia), Art Canadian Cancer Society, Plain Packaging Overview February 13, 2015.

3 3 family (thus there is only one Marlboro, not many brand variants such as Marlboro Red, Marlboro Gold, Marlboro Silver, and Marlboro Menthol). 10 Provinces have longstanding legislative experience on tobacco packaging In Canada, there has been longstanding provincial legislative experience regarding tobacco packaging, including the following: Requiring package health warnings (BC, ON) o British Columbia by regulation required a health warning on tobacco packages between 1972 and 1989, at a time when there was no federal package warning requirement. Between 1989 and 1994, BC regulation required the same package warnings as were required federally, incorporating by reference federal requirements. 11 o Ontario has had provincial regulations from 1994 to the present (2015) requiring the same package health warnings as are required federally. 12 o Other provinces (MB, QC, NS) have had regulatory authority to require provinciallymandated package health warnings, but this regulatory authority has not been used. 13 Establishing regulatory authority for plain packaging, though this regulatory authority has not been used (BC, MB, ON, QC, NS). 14 Requiring minimum quantities per package. The federal government has had a minimum quantity for sale of 20 for cigarettes (since 1994) 15 and for little cigars and blunt wraps (since 2010). 16 Several provinces have gone beyond federal provisions: o general Quebec requires all tobacco products (eg cigars, bidis, tobacco sticks) to be sold in a minimum of 10 units, though this does not apply if the price is less than $10.00, 17 and though for cigarettes the minimum quantity is o bidis - Alberta requires bidis to be sold in a minimum quantity of 20 (effective June 1, 2015) Ministry of Public Health Ordinance No. 466 on Packaging and Labelling, 2010 (Uruguay). 11 Tobacco Product Regulation, B.C. Reg. 258/72, am. B.C. Reg. 347/89, repealed by B.C. Reg. 216/ Smoke-Free Ontario Act, S.O. 1994, c.10, s.5.1; General Regulations, O. Reg. 613/94, s.9; General Regulations, O Reg 48/06, s The Non-Smokers Health Protection Act, C.C.S.M. c. N92, s.9(1)(e); Smoke-Free Ontario Act, S.O. 1994, c. 10, ss.5(1), 19(1)(d), 19(4); Tobacco Act, R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), s.28; Tobacco Access Act, S.N.S. 1993, c.14, s.9(2). In Quebec, provincial regulations regarding packaging must be harmonized with federal law. 14 Tobacco Control Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 451, ss. 2(1)(a), 11(2)(a); The Non-Smokers Health Protection Act, C.C.S.M. c. N92, s.9(1)(e); Tobacco Act, R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), s.28; Tobacco Access Act, S.N.S. 1993, c.14, s.9(2). In Quebec, provincial regulations regarding packaging must be harmonized with federal law. 15 Tobacco Sales to Young Persons Act, S.C. 1993, c.5, s.7.1, enacted by S.C. 1994, c.37, s. 11. See also Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s.10, am S.C. 2009, c.27, s Regulation under the Tobacco Act, C.Q.L.R. c. T-0.01, r. 1, s Tobacco Act R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), s.19.

4 4 o tobacco sticks New Brunswick requires tobacco sticks to be sold in a minimum quantity of Newfoundland and Labrador previously did so. 21 o little cigars SK (2010) and ON (2010) have a minimum quantity for the sale of little cigars of 20 and have a broader definition of little cigars than the federal definition. The federal definition of little cigars includes a cigar with a cigarette filter while the Saskatchewan and Ontario definitions apply to any type of filter. 22 Saskatchewan had previously (2004) adopted a requirement of a minimum quantity for little cigars of 5, though little cigars were not defined at that time. 23 o cigars Alberta requires cigars weighing more than 1.4g and less than 5g (excluding the weight of any mouthpiece or tip) to be sold in a minimum quantity of 4 if the unit retail price per cigar is $4.00 or less (effective June 1, 2015). 24 o cigarettes in 1993, several provinces (NB, NS, NL) enacted minimum quantities for the sale of cigarettes (15 or 20, depending on the province). 25 Later, a federal minimum quantity of 20 for cigarettes was adopted and came into force on November 24, It is worth noting that, in effect, a minimum quantity per package also increases the minimum package size, just as a minimum warning size in millimeters may increase the minimum package size. There are many other examples of where provincial tobacco legislation has gone beyond federal legislation: Banning vending machines (MB, ON, QC, NS, PEI, NWT, NU), though federally vending machines are only partially restricted and allowed in bars Tobacco Smoking and Reduction Regulation, Alta Reg 240/2007, s.9.1, enacted by Alta Reg. 201/2014, s Tobacco Sales Act, S.N.B. 1993, c.t-6.1, s Tobacco Control Act, S.N.L. 1993, c. T-4.1, s.4 (the minimum package size provision in s.4 was later repealed). 22 The Tobacco Control Act, S.S. 2001, c.t-14.1, s.2(c.2), enacted by S.S. 2010, c.34, s.3; Smoke-Free Ontario Act, S.O. 1994, c.10, s.6.1, enacted by 2010, c. 1, Sched. 27, s. 2 (1); General Regulation, O. Reg. 48/06, s.1.1, enacted by O. Reg. 237/10, s The Tobacco Control Amendment Act, 2004, S.S. 2004, c.51, s.4, enacting s. 5(2) of The Tobacco Control Act. 24 Tobacco Smoking and Reduction Regulation, Alta. Reg. 240/2007, s.9.1, enacted by Alta. Reg. 201/2014, s Tobacco Sales Act, S.N.B. 1993, c.t-6.1, s.4; Tobacco Access Act, S.N.S. 1993, c. 14, s. 7; Tobacco Control Act, S.N.L. 1993, c. T-4.1, s.4. More provinces subsequently established a minimum quantity of 20 for the sale of cigarettes. 26 Tobacco Sales to Young Persons Act, S.C. 1993, c.5, s.7.1, enacted by S.C. 1994, c.37, s. 11. See also Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s.10; Tobacco Control Act, S.N.L. 1993, c. T-4.1, s.4 (the minimum package size provision in s.4 was later repealed). 27 Eg Tobacco Control Act, 1994 S.O. 1994, c. 10, s.7; Tobacco Access Act S.N.S. 1993, c., s.6; Tobacco Control Act S.Nu. 2003, c.13, s.12. For federal vending machine restrictions, see Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s.12. For a summary of prohibitions on locations of sale, see Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Prohibition of Tobacco Sales in Specific Places: Monitoring Update June 22, 2012.

5 5 Requiring a minimum sales to minors age of 19 (BC, ON, NB, NS, PEI, NL, NU), though the federal age is 18. Restricting flavoured tobacco. Alberta 28 and Ontario Bill contain restrictions on flavoured tobacco going far beyond federal restrictions on flavoured tobacco. Further, Ontario s initial ban on flavoured little cigars (2010) has had a definition of little cigars that goes beyond the federal definition. 30 Restricting sales, marketing and use of e-cigarettes, including e-cigarettes without nicotine (NS, Ontario Bill 45). 31 There are no federal restrictions on e-cigarettes without nicotine. Banning tobacco sponsorship. Quebec (1998) enacted a ban on tobacco sponsorship prior to the enactment of a federal ban. 32 Banning brand-stretching. Quebec in 1998 adopted a ban on all tobacco brand names, logos and trademarks on non-tobacco goods (e.g. T-shirts, sport bags), while federal legislation allows tobacco brand names, logos and trademarks on certain non-tobacco goods, such as lighters and matches. 33 Restricting tobacco advertising. BC banned tobacco advertising in 1972, before replacing the ban with partial restrictions from 1972 to 1994 (the partial restrictions included a ban on billboard advertising, and requiring a health warning to appear on permitted advertising) Tobacco Reduction (Flavoured Tobacco Products) Amendment Act, 2013, S.A. 2013, c.25, proclaimed into force on November 13, 2014 effective June 1, 2015; Tobacco Reduction Amendment Regulation, Alta. Reg. 201/ Bill 45, Making Healthier Choices Act, 2014, first reading November 24, Smoke-Free Ontario Act, S.O. 1994, c.10, s.6.1, enacted by 2010, c. 1, Sched. 27, s. 2 (1). General Regulation, O. Reg. 48/06, s.1.1, enacted by O. Reg. 237/10, s. 1. The federal definition of little cigars includes a cigar with a cigarette filter while the Ontario definition applies to any type of filter. 31 An Act to Amend Chapter 12 of the Acts of 2002, the Smoke-free Places Act, and Chapter 14 of the Acts of 1993, the Tobacco Access Act, S.N.S. 2014, c. 58; Ontario Bill 45, Making Healthier Choices Act, 2014, first reading November 24, 2014 (Schedule 3 of Bill 45 would enact the Electronic Cigarettes Act, 2014). 32 Quebec adopted such a sponsorship ban on June 18, 1998 effective Oct. 1, 2003 (Tobacco Act R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), ss.22, 23, 72, 73), whereas at the time (June 1998), the federal Act contained only restrictions on sponsorship advertising but was amended on Dec. 10, 1998 to include a total ban as of Oct. 1, 2003: An Act to amend the Tobacco Act, S.C. 1998, c Tobacco Act, R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), s.27; Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s. 26(1). 34 Tobacco Advertising Restraint Act, S.B.C. 1971, c. 65, repealed by Tobacco Advertising Restraint Act Repeal Act, S.B.C (Second Sess.), c. 12; Tobacco Products Act, S.B.C (Second Sess.), c. 13 (later renamed Tobacco Sales Act); Tobacco Products Regulation, B.C. Reg. 258/72, am. B.C. Reg. 347/89, repealed by B.C. Reg. 216/94; Tobacco Sales Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 451, s. 11(2).

6 6 There were no federal restrictions on tobacco advertising until Quebec s tobacco advertising restrictions, enacted in 1998, go beyond federal restrictions. Quebec does not have exemptions allowing advertising in direct mail or in places where minors are prohibited by law (e.g. bars), though federal legislation contains such exemptions. 36 Quebec has also required health warnings on permitted print advertising, 37 though there is no such federal requirement. Restricting tobacco advertising and displays at point of sale. All provinces and territories ban visible displays at retail, though there is no such federal ban despite federal regulatory authority to do so. All provinces and territories restrict or ban advertising signs at point of sale going beyond federal restrictions. For example, federal provisions do not limit the quantity or size of permitted signs, but there are provincial/territorial restrictions. Federal provisions allow brand names on signs in any font style, 38 but 9 provinces/territories (BC, SK, MB, ON, NB, NS, PEI, NL, YT) ban brand names and other brand trademarks on such signs, 39 while two territories (NWT, NU) do not permit any price signs at retail. 40 Alberta allows brand names on signs, but requires brand names to appear in black text on a white background in a standard appearance. 41 Quebec allows brand names on signs, but only in black text in a white background. 42 Banning self-service displays. Nova Scotia adopted a ban on self-service displays (1993) 43 before a federal ban was adopted and in effect on November 24, (Other provinces and territories subsequently adopted a ban on self-service display bans as part of retail display bans). 35 Tobacco Products Control Act, R.S.C (4th Supp.), c.14, formerly S.C. 1988, c.20, in effect January 1, 1989 with some transition periods. 36 Tobacco Act R.S.Q., c. T-0.01 (previously S.Q. 1998, c.33), s.24, Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s. 22(2). 37 Regulation respecting the warning attributed to the Minister of Health and Social Services concerning the harmful effects of tobacco on health, R.R.Q., c. T-0.01, r Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s. 30(2). 39 Tobacco Control Regulation, B.C. Reg. 232/2007, s.4.32; The Tobacco Control Regulations, R.R.S. C- T-14.1, s.3.1; Non-Smokers Health Protection Regulation, Man. Reg. 174/2004, s.10.2; General Regulation, O. Reg. 48/06, s.7; General Regulation, N.B. Reg , s.6.1; Tobacco Access Regulations, N.S. Reg. 9/96, s.3d; General Regulations, P.E.I. Reg. EC414/05, s.1.2; Tobacco Control Regulations, N.L.R. 119/09; Tobacco Products Sales Regulation, Y.O.I.C. 2010/27, s Tobacco Control Act, S.N.W.T. 2006, c 9, s.5; Tobacco Control Regulations, N.W.T. Reg ; Tobacco Control Act, S.Nu. 2003, c 13, s.8; Tobacco Control Regulations, Nu. Reg The Northwest Territories and Nunavut statutes prohibit advertising signs at retail unless permitted by regulation, but no exceptions are allowed by regulation. 41 Tobacco and Smoking Reduction Regulation, Alta. Reg. 240/2007, s Regulation under the Tobacco Act, R.R.Q., c. T-0.01, r. 1, s Tobacco Access Act, S.N.S. 1993, c Tobacco Sales to Young Persons Act, S.C. 1993, c.5, s.7.1, enacted by S.C. 1994, c.37, s. 11. See also Tobacco Act, S.C. 1997, c.13, s.10.

7 7 Establishing far more detailed reporting requirements for additives and toxic emissions, including public disclosure (BC, 1998) than existed federally. 45 Federal additive and toxic emission reporting requirements were adopted later (2000) and without a requirement for public disclosure. 46 Other examples of provincial legislation going beyond federal legislation include requiring health warning signs to be posted at retail (e.g. BC, NB, NS, NL, NU) and banning candy cigarettes and other confectionary resembling a tobacco product (YT, NU). 47 Court cases have consistently upheld provincial authority to enact tobacco legislation more restrictive than federal legislation Court cases are clear provinces have authority to adopt tobacco legislation that is more restrictive than federal tobacco legislation: In 2005, in the key case of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, 48 a unanimous (9:0) Supreme Court of Canada upheld Saskatchewan s ban on visible tobacco displays at retail, a ban that went far further than federal restrictions on tobacco promotion. In 1998, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal upheld a minimum provincial tobacco sales to minors age of 19, which was higher than the federal minimum age of In 1972, the BC Supreme Court upheld a provincial ban on tobacco advertising at a time when there were no federal restrictions on tobacco advertising. 50 The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that tobacco legislation is an area of concurrent federal/provincial responsibility. In 1995 in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 51 the Supreme Court stated at p.249: Indeed the Act [banning tobacco advertising] forms only one part of a comprehensive and multi-faceted federal and provincial program to control and reduce the consumption of tobacco. In 1997 in R. v. Hydro-Québec, 52 the Supreme Court stated, at p.299: 45 Tobacco Testing and Disclosure Regulation, B.C. Reg. 282/ Tobacco Reporting Regulations, SOR/ Smoke-free Places Regulation, 2009, Y.O.I.C. 2009/99, s.11; Tobacco Control Act, S.Nu. 2003, c [2005] 1 S.C.R R. v. Sobey s Inc. (1998), 172 D.L.R. (4 th ) 111 (N.S.C.A.), per Cromwell JA, as he then was. 50 Benson & Hedges (Canada) Ltd. v. Attorney General of British Columbia (1972), 27 D.L.R. (3d) 257 (B.C.S.C.). 51 [1995] 3 S.C.R [1997] 3 S.C.R. 213.

8 8 The two levels of government frequently work together to meet common concerns. The cooperative measures relating to the use of tobacco are fully related in RJR-MacDonald, supra. Recently, on February 6, 2015, in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 53 at para. 53, the Supreme Court of Canada reaffirmed that tobacco legislation (cited in RJR-MacDonald) is an example of health legislation that is of concurrent federal/provincial jurisdiction: Health is an area of concurrent jurisdiction; both Parliament and the provinces may validly legislate on the topic: RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199, at para. 32; Schneider v. The Queen, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 112, at p There is no trademark issue of concern Federal trademark legislation gives the trademark owner the right to register the trademark and to prevent others from using the trademark without permission. Federal trademark legislation does not give the trademark owner a right to have unrestricted use of the trademark. Any use of the trademark is subject to other laws. Provincial legislation has long restricted the use of tobacco brand names and other tobacco trademarks. Examples (discussed previously above) include Banning tobacco trademarks from appearing in prohibited advertisements such as on billboards, buses, or signs in bars. Banning tobacco trademarks appearing on non-tobacco goods, such as T-shirts, sport bags, baseball hats, lighters, matches and ashtrays. Banning tobacco packages (including packages with tobacco trademarks) from being displayed at retail. Banning vending machines thus banning tobacco trademarks from being depicted on vending machines. Banning tobacco trademarks from being depicted on permitted signage at retail, or only allowing brand names to appear in a standard appearance in black text on a white background (and not the trademarked font style/colour(s) for the brand name). Establishing regulatory authority to require plain packaging, which would prohibit trademarks from appearing on packages (except for the brand name in a standard font style, size/colour(s)). To date such regulatory authority has not been used. Regarding a minimum size for package warnings, there would be no adverse impact on tobacco companies to use the branded part of the package. On the front and back of the package, the proportionate sizes would still be 75% for the warning and 25% from the branded portion. For the branded part, the size in fact would probably increase in terms of square millimeters. The same would the case if superslim formats were banned. Consumers would be receiving the same information but more prominently. Consumers would not be receiving less information SCC 5.

9 9 It is worth noting that various package shapes (e.g. superslim packages, and octagonal packages with beveled edges) are not unique to a single tobacco company but rather are used by all three major tobacco companies in Canada. Even if a minimum size for package warnings would affect certain trademarks and/or package formats, a province could do this. Provinces have previously affected package formats by no longer permitting certain tobacco products to be sold in units of 1, 2, 5, 10 etc by requiring greater minimum quantity for sale. The package is not the product the package contains the product, whether cigarettes or other tobacco products. The tobacco package is a type of advertising. Restricting or banning trademarks on tobacco packaging would be a restriction on tobacco advertising that would be merely an extension of other provincial laws restricting tobacco advertising. Further, restricting or banning trademarks on tobacco packaging would not affect the practice of depicting tobacco trademarks on the cigarette itself. In upholding the 1972 BC ban on tobacco (and alcohol) advertising, the BC Supreme Court rejected arguments that this was an improper provincial restriction on the use of trademarks. The plaintiff tobacco and liquor companies had made several arguments, including that the legislation expunged trademarks within the province. This argument was soundly rejected at p.266: 54 The manufacturers of liquor products are still entitled to use their registered trade marks on their products to identify them. It is contended that the restriction on advertising is an improper restriction upon the use of the trade mark, but... I conclude that the rights arising from the granting of a trade mark cannot be exercised in contravention of the laws of the Province restricting the rights of the public in the Province generally. Conclusion There is no legal impediment for a province to regulate tobacco packaging on the basis that the provincial regulation would be more restrictive than federal legislation. 54 Benson & Hedges (Canada) Ltd. v. Attorney General of British Columbia (1972), 27 D.L.R. (3d) 257 (BCSC). The conclusion for tobacco trademarks was the same as for liquor trademarks, at p.276.

BEST PRACTICES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE WHO FCTC CASE STUDY: MAURITIUS. Rob Cunningham May 2013

BEST PRACTICES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE WHO FCTC CASE STUDY: MAURITIUS. Rob Cunningham May 2013 BEST PRACTICES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE WHO FCTC CASE STUDY: MAURITIUS Rob Cunningham May 2013 Introduction Mauritius has been a leader in Africa in terms of requirements for tobacco packaging

More information

Estimating the volume of Contraband Sales of Tobacco in Canada

Estimating the volume of Contraband Sales of Tobacco in Canada The Canadian Tobacco Market Place Estimating the volume of Contraband Sales of Tobacco in Canada Updated April 2010 Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada 1226 A Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 3A1

More information

(English text signed by the State President) as amended by

(English text signed by the State President) as amended by TOBACCO PRODUCTS CONTROL ACT 83 OF 1993 [ASSENTED TO 23 JUNE 1993] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 FEBRUARY 1994] (English text signed by the State President) as amended by General Law Fifth Amendment Act 157

More information

Country profile. New Zealand

Country profile. New Zealand Country profile New Zealand WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2004 Socioeconomic context

More information

Country profile. Hungary

Country profile. Hungary Country profile Hungary WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 April 2004 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis. February 2018

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis. February 2018 An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis February 2018 I m here today to provide 1 2 3 Context for the Government of Canada s plan to legalize,

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to August 20, 2016. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This

More information

Country profile. Republic of Moldova

Country profile. Republic of Moldova Country profile Republic of Moldova WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 February 2009 Socioeconomic

More information

Country profile. Austria

Country profile. Austria Country profile Austria WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 28 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2005 Socioeconomic context

More information

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Country profile United Kingdom of Great Britain and rthern Ireland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)

More information

MARKETING STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP

MARKETING STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP MARKETING STANDARDS FOR MEMBERSHIP The Vapor Technology Association (VTA) is a leading national trade association in the electronic cigarette and vapor product industry. VTA represents the manufacturers,

More information

Country profile. Russian Federation. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status

Country profile. Russian Federation. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Country profile Russian Federation WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 June 2008 Socioeconomic context

More information

Country profile. Senegal

Country profile. Senegal Country profile Senegal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 19 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2005 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Italy

Country profile. Italy Country profile Italy WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 2 July 2008 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

An Overview of Administrative Driver License Suspensions and Criminal Code Charges for Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving in Canada:

An Overview of Administrative Driver License Suspensions and Criminal Code Charges for Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving in Canada: An Overview of Administrative Driver License Suspensions and Criminal Code Charges for Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driving in Canada: 2008-2014 September 2016 1 Introduction Alcohol and drug impaired driving

More information

Country profile. Trinidad and Tobago

Country profile. Trinidad and Tobago Country profile Trinidad and Tobago WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 27 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 19 August 2004 Socioeconomic

More information

9/25/2015. Retail Regulations: Addressing Electronic Smoking Devices at the Point of Sale. Recorded on September 25, 2015.

9/25/2015. Retail Regulations: Addressing Electronic Smoking Devices at the Point of Sale. Recorded on September 25, 2015. Retail Regulations: Addressing Electronic Smoking Devices at the Point of Sale Recorded on September 25, 2015 Katie Byerly 1 Welcome! Jessica Eaddy, MPH CounterTobacco.org s New Project Director and Managing

More information

Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations

Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011 1 Select Legislative Instrument 2011 No. 263 I, QUENTIN BRYCE, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive

More information

Country profile. Denmark

Country profile. Denmark Country profile Denmark WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 16 December 2004 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Sweden

Country profile. Sweden Country profile Sweden WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 July 2005 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Egypt

Country profile. Egypt Country profile Egypt WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 17 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 25 February 2005 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis I m here today to provide 1 2 3 Context for the Government of Canada s plan to legalize, regulate

More information

Country profile. Canada

Country profile. Canada Country profile Canada WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 15 July 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 26 vember 2004 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Angola

Country profile. Angola Country profile Angola WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Strengthening Ontario s Smoking and Vaping Laws Summary of Proposed Regulation under Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017

Strengthening Ontario s Smoking and Vaping Laws Summary of Proposed Regulation under Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017 Strengthening Ontario s Smoking and Vaping Laws Summary of Proposed Regulation under Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017 Introduction The Smoke-Free Ontario Act, 2017 (SFOA, 2017) Schedule 3 to Bill 174 --received

More information

Country profile. Ukraine

Country profile. Ukraine Country profile Ukraine WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 June 2006 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina Country profile Bosnia and Herzegovina WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 July 2009 Socioeconomic context

More information

Organ Donation and Transplantation in Canada

Organ Donation and Transplantation in Canada Organ Donation and Transplantation in Canada 216 System Progress Report Update Canadian Blood Services, 217. All rights reserved. Extracts from this report may be reviewed, reproduced or translated for

More information

Does increasing Tobacco Tax increase Contraband? Debunking the Taxation and Contraband Tobacco Myth

Does increasing Tobacco Tax increase Contraband? Debunking the Taxation and Contraband Tobacco Myth Welcome to today s webinar: Does increasing Tobacco Tax increase Contraband? Debunking the Taxation and Contraband Tobacco Myth Dr. Robert Schwartz, Dr. Bo Zhang Start time: 11:00 A.M. 12:00 P.M. For audio,

More information

REPORTING INSTRUMENT

REPORTING INSTRUMENT REPORTING INSTRUMENT 1. Origin of the report (a) Name of Contracting Party Sri Lanka (b) Information on National Contact/Focal Point Name and title of contact officer Dr. Lakshmi C. Somatunga, Director/Non

More information

Country profile. Cuba

Country profile. Cuba Country profile Cuba WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Gambia

Country profile. Gambia Country profile Gambia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 18 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

ICD-10 Reciprocal Billing File Technical Specifications Reference Guide for Ontario Hospitals

ICD-10 Reciprocal Billing File Technical Specifications Reference Guide for Ontario Hospitals ICD-10 Reciprocal Billing File Technical Specifications Reference Guide for Ontario Hospitals Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Version 3 January 2014 ICD Reciprocal Billing File Technical Specifications

More information

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Iran (Islamic Republic of) Country profile Iran (Islamic Republic of) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 November 2005 Socioeconomic

More information

Smoking Cessation and the Workplace

Smoking Cessation and the Workplace Smoking Cessation and the Workplace Profile of Tobacco Smokers and Workplace Smoking Cessation Policies and Programs Louise Chénier Manager, Workplace Health and Wellness Research The Conference Board

More information

Country profile. Guinea

Country profile. Guinea Country profile Guinea WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 1 April 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 vember 2007 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Country profile. Morocco

Country profile. Morocco Country profile Morocco WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 April 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Regulatory Options under the Federal Tobacco Act

Regulatory Options under the Federal Tobacco Act Regulatory Options under the Federal Tobacco Act Promotion and Packaging A Report to the Ministry of Health and Ministry Responsible for Seniors Victoria, British Columbia December 1997 PHYSICIANS FOR

More information

America s Most Wanted Tobacco Villains The Usual Suspects, New Villains and Emerging Threats

America s Most Wanted Tobacco Villains The Usual Suspects, New Villains and Emerging Threats America s Most Wanted Tobacco Villains The Usual Suspects, New Villains and Emerging Threats The United States has made enormous progress in reducing youth smoking, with the smoking rate among high school

More information

Country profile. Colombia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008

Country profile. Colombia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008 Country profile Colombia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Tamper-Resistant Properties of Drugs Regulations (TRPDR)

Tamper-Resistant Properties of Drugs Regulations (TRPDR) Tamper-Resistant Properties of Drugs Regulations (TRPDR) Cost Impact Analysis, 2019 PMPRB presentation to federal, provincial, and territorial public plan representatives on September 29, 2015. 1 Patented

More information

Country profile. Indonesia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)

Country profile. Indonesia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) Country profile Indonesia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t signed t ratified Socioeconomic context Population

More information

The Tobacco Control Act

The Tobacco Control Act 1 The Tobacco Control Act being Chapter T-14.1* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001 (effective March 11, 2002) as amended by Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2002, c.c-11.1 and R-8.2; 2003, c.15; 2004, c.51;

More information

FDA Tobacco Retailers Compliance Program Presentation

FDA Tobacco Retailers Compliance Program Presentation Arizona Department of Health Services FDA Tobacco Retailers Compliance Program Presentation June 29, 2011 Revised 06/27/11 FDA Retail Tobacco Compliance Program In contract with Arizona Department of Health

More information

Improving the regulatory framework for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and emerging tobacco and nicotine-delivery products

Improving the regulatory framework for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and emerging tobacco and nicotine-delivery products [In Confidence] Office of the Associate Minister Health Chair, Cabinet Improving the regulatory framework for electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and emerging tobacco and nicotine-delivery products Proposal

More information

Mitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association

Mitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association Regulatory Public Laws Compliance & Education Policies Science & Enforcement & Communications The FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Its Role in Reducing Tobacco Use Mitch Zeller, Director, Center

More information

Country profile. Brazil

Country profile. Brazil Country profile Brazil WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 vember 2005 Socioeconomic context Population

More information

Office of the Chief Medical Health Officer

Office of the Chief Medical Health Officer September 26, 2017 RE: BC Cannabis Regulation Engagement Vancouver Coastal Health s s support the legalization and regulation of cannabis. Please find below our submission to the British Columbia Cannabis

More information

Are We All Going to Pot?: Legal Issues Arising from Cannabis-Industry Growth The Canadian Perspective

Are We All Going to Pot?: Legal Issues Arising from Cannabis-Industry Growth The Canadian Perspective Are We All Going to Pot?: Legal Issues Arising from Cannabis-Industry Growth The Canadian Perspective John A. Myers and Colin B. Findlay SCG Legal Annual General Meeting September 16, 2016 Boston Licensed

More information

B.C. Cannabis PRIVATE RETAIL LICENSING GUIDE Applications and Operations

B.C. Cannabis PRIVATE RETAIL LICENSING GUIDE Applications and Operations B.C. Cannabis PRIVATE RETAIL LICENSING GUIDE Applications and Operations Copyright February 2018, Province of British Columbia. All rights reserved. This material is owned by the Government of British

More information

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA NATIONAL AUTHORITY ON TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL (AMENDMENT) A BILL to amend the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol Act, No. 27 of 2006 Presented

More information

AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING ENFORCEMENT AND PROVINCIAL LICENCE SUSPENSIONS IN CANADA

AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING ENFORCEMENT AND PROVINCIAL LICENCE SUSPENSIONS IN CANADA 0 AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING ENFORCEMENT AND PROVINCIAL LICENCE SUSPENSIONS IN CANADA R. Solomon & E. Chamberlain Professors, Faculty of Law Western University September 12 1 INTRODUCTION

More information

Poison Control Centres

Poison Control Centres Poison Control Centres Monica Durigon Field Epidemiologist Public Health Agency of Canada Joanne Stares Public Health Officer Public Health Agency of Canada Placement site: BC Centre for Disease Control

More information

SUMMARY OF THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MSA)

SUMMARY OF THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MSA) SUMMARY OF THE MASTER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (MSA) The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the states and the major U.S. tobacco companies will direct a lot of money to the states, but it says nothing

More information

2016 No. 507 CONSUMER PROTECTION. The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016

2016 No. 507 CONSUMER PROTECTION. The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016 S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2016 No. 507 CONSUMER PROTECTION The Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016 Made - - - - 18th April 2016 Laid before Parliament 22nd April 2016 Coming into

More information

Cannabis Legalization and Regulation in British Columbia Discussion Paper

Cannabis Legalization and Regulation in British Columbia Discussion Paper Cannabis Legalization and Regulation in British Columbia Discussion Paper Introduction In 2015, the federal government committed to legalizing non-medical cannabis in Canada. On June 30, 2016, it established

More information

Bangladesh National Parliament

Bangladesh National Parliament Registered No. D A-1 Bangladesh Gazette Additional Issue Published by the Authority Thursday, May 2, 2013 Bangladesh National Parliament Dhaka, 02 May, 2013 / 19 Baishak, 1420 The following act was accepted

More information

Commercial Cannabis Signage Ordinance

Commercial Cannabis Signage Ordinance Department of City Planning Case No. CPC-2017-4546-CA Commercial Cannabis Signage Ordinance Questions & Answers November 14, 2017 Summary The Commercial Cannabis Signage Ordinance is a proposed Los Angeles

More information

- Decree nº (January 2 nd, 2006) Promulgates the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

- Decree nº (January 2 nd, 2006) Promulgates the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Brazilian Federal Legislation on Tobacco Control 3.1.1 General obligations - Decree (August 1 st, 2003) Creates the National Commission for the Implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

More information

vaccination in Canada Bernard Duval, md, mph, frcpc Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec Québec, Canada Sevilla,

vaccination in Canada Bernard Duval, md, mph, frcpc Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec Québec, Canada Sevilla, Follow-up of hepatitis B vaccination in Canada Bernard Duval, md, mph, frcpc Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec Québec, Canada Sevilla, 2004-03 03-11 HB in Canada Low endemicity: HBsAg+ : 0.5%

More information

Physiotherapists in Canada, 2011 National and Jurisdictional Highlights

Physiotherapists in Canada, 2011 National and Jurisdictional Highlights pic pic pic Physiotherapists in Canada, 2011 National and Jurisdictional Highlights Spending and Health Workforce Our Vision Better data. Better decisions. Healthier Canadians. Our Mandate To lead the

More information

Council Directive 93/42/EEC (14 June 1993), Article 12a, OJ L 169, , p. 1. 3

Council Directive 93/42/EEC (14 June 1993), Article 12a, OJ L 169, , p. 1. 3 AMDR Summary: International Regulation of Single-Use Medical Device Reprocessing Since 2000, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has regulated reprocessors of so-called single-use medical

More information

Estimated Number and Percentage of Alcohol and Impairment- Related Crash Fatalities and Injuries, by Jurisdiction, Age and Population: Canada, 2009

Estimated Number and Percentage of Alcohol and Impairment- Related Crash Fatalities and Injuries, by Jurisdiction, Age and Population: Canada, 2009 Estimated Number and Percentage of Alcohol and Impairment- Related Crash and Injuries, by Jurisdiction, Age and Population: Canada, 2009 R. Solomon, Professor M. Cassidy, J.D. 2014 The Faculty of Law Western

More information

PHASE 2 (GROUP 2 QUESTIONS) OF THE REPORTING INSTRUMENT UNDER THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL 1. ORIGIN OF THE REPORT

PHASE 2 (GROUP 2 QUESTIONS) OF THE REPORTING INSTRUMENT UNDER THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL 1. ORIGIN OF THE REPORT PHASE 2 (GROUP 2 QUESTIONS) OF THE REPORTING INSTRUMENT UNDER THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL 1. ORIGIN OF THE REPORT 1.1 NAME OF CONTRACTING PARTY CYPRUS 1.2 Information on national contact

More information

Tobacco Packages: Ads for tobacco companies or tools for public health?

Tobacco Packages: Ads for tobacco companies or tools for public health? Tobacco Packages: Ads for tobacco companies or tools for public health? Heather Selin Tobacco Control Advisor, PAHO/WHO 2005 The Importance of the Package To tobacco companies: Critical link between ads

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District 7 (Burlington)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District 7 (Burlington) ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. District (Burlington) SYNOPSIS Prohibits sale of menthol cigarettes. CURRENT VERSION OF

More information

Ontario Government to Grow LCBO: Recreational Cannabis to be sold at Government Stores

Ontario Government to Grow LCBO: Recreational Cannabis to be sold at Government Stores Capital Markets Bulletin September 2017 Ontario Government to Grow LCBO: Recreational Cannabis to be sold at Government Stores On September 8, 2017, Ontario s provincial government unveiled its much-anticipated

More information

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DECISIONS

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DECISIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE A/FCTC/COP/1/DIV/8/Corr.1 WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION 14 August 2006 ON TOBACCO CONTROL First session Geneva, 6-17 February 2006 DECISIONS List of

More information

REPORTING INSTRUMENT OF THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL

REPORTING INSTRUMENT OF THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL REPORTING INSTRUMENT OF THE WHO FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON TOBACCO CONTROL In order to use the interactive features of the reporting instrument, please follow the instructions below. It is essential to complete

More information

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/64/EU

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/64/EU L 176/24 Official Journal of the European Union 5.7.2011 DIRECTIVES COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (codification)

More information

Providing Leadership in Public Health Management

Providing Leadership in Public Health Management 2 Carlton Street, Suite 1306 Toronto, Ontario M5B 1J3 Tel: (416) 595-0006 Fax: (416) 595-0030 E-mail: info@alphaweb.org alpha s members are the public health units in Ontario. alpha Sections: Boards of

More information

DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE NO. KEP-22/BC/2001 DATED APRIL 20, 2001 PACKAGES OF RETAILED TOBACCO PRODUCTS

DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE NO. KEP-22/BC/2001 DATED APRIL 20, 2001 PACKAGES OF RETAILED TOBACCO PRODUCTS DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE NO. KEP-22/BC/2001 DATED APRIL 20, 2001 PACKAGES OF RETAILED TOBACCO PRODUCTS THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE, Considering : that in the

More information

Canadian Smokers Support for Tobacco Endgame Strategies: Findings from the ITC Canada Survey

Canadian Smokers Support for Tobacco Endgame Strategies: Findings from the ITC Canada Survey Canadian Smokers Support for Tobacco Endgame Strategies: Findings from the ITC Canada Survey A report prepared for the 2016 Canadian Tobacco Endgame Summit September 2016 Acknowledgements The ITC Four

More information

CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM SMOKING CONTROL BYLAW, Bylaw No. 4037

CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM SMOKING CONTROL BYLAW, Bylaw No. 4037 The Council of the Corporation of the City of Port Coquitlam enacts as follows: 1. CITATION This Bylaw may be cited as the Smoking Control Bylaw, 2018, No. 4037. 2. REPEAL City of Port Coquitlam Smoking

More information

TOBACCO AND ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE SALES AND ACCESS ACT REGULATIONS

TOBACCO AND ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE SALES AND ACCESS ACT REGULATIONS c t TOBACCO AND ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE SALES AND ACCESS ACT REGULATIONS PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current

More information

Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends

Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends 21 EDITION University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario www.tobaccoreport.ca Tobacco Use in Canada: Patterns and Trends 21 Edition This report was prepared by Jessica

More information

Amending Your Land Use Bylaw To Prepare For The Retail Sale Of Cannabis

Amending Your Land Use Bylaw To Prepare For The Retail Sale Of Cannabis 1 Amending Your Land Use Bylaw To Prepare For The Retail Sale Of Cannabis The Federal Government has proposed that by July 2018 non -medical cannabis will be legalized in Canada. Currently, cannabis possession

More information

Other EU Activities Contributing to Harmonization of Labeling

Other EU Activities Contributing to Harmonization of Labeling Other EU Activities Contributing to Harmonization of Labeling Dr Laurent Brassart European Medicines Agency Medical Information Sector DIA Labeling Harmonisation 2011 Workshop October 13-14. 2011 Disclaimer

More information

UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS. Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products

UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS. Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products May 24, 2016 OVERVIEW OF TODAY S PRESENTATION Highlights of the Deeming Final Rule

More information

Supply, Distribution and Migration of Canadian Physicians, 2010

Supply, Distribution and Migration of Canadian Physicians, 2010 Supply, Distribution and Migration of Canadian Physicians, 2010 Spending and Health Workforce Who We Are Established in 1994, CIHI is an independent, not-for-profit corporation that provides essential

More information

Webinar. Restricting Marketing to Children: an update from Health Canada. February 28, 2017

Webinar. Restricting Marketing to Children: an update from Health Canada. February 28, 2017 Webinar Restricting Marketing to Children: an update from Health Canada February 28, 2017 HOUSEKEEPING For audio, dial-in to the teleconference line - Call-in TOLL-FREE number: 1-877-413-4790 (Canada and

More information

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA NATIONAL AUTHORITY ON TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL (AMENDMENT) ACT, No. 3 OF 2015 [Certified on 03rd March, 2015] Printed on the Order of Government

More information

Review of Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

Review of Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Review of Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Canadian Medical Association: Submission to Health Canada in response to the consultation on the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and its regulations A

More information

Law on the Limited Use of Tobacco Products

Law on the Limited Use of Tobacco Products Law on the Limited Use of Tobacco Products Date of adoption: January 1998 Date of proclamation by Decree: 24 February 1998 Date of publication: 9 March 1998 (No. 6, Page 147 Official Gazette of the BIH

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN BILL SCHUETTE, ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF MICHIGAN BILL SCHUETTE, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MICHIGAN BILL SCHUETTE, ATTORNEY GENERAL YOUTH TOBACCO ACT: AGE OF MAJORITY ACT: Validity of local ordinance raising the age of persons able to purchase tobacco products to the age of 21. PREEMPTION:

More information

Compliance with the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) Results from 2012 and 2013: Maharashtra

Compliance with the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) Results from 2012 and 2013: Maharashtra Compliance with the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) Results from 2012 and 2013: Maharashtra www.globaltobaccocontrol.org Institute for Global Tobacco Control COTPA Overview The Cigarettes

More information

Comparative Review of Occupational Health and Safety in Canadian Jurisdictions

Comparative Review of Occupational Health and Safety in Canadian Jurisdictions Comparative Review of Occupational Health and Safety in Canadian Jurisdictions September 30, 1997 Prepared For: Royal Commission on Workers Compensation in British Columbia Prepared by: Kim Thorau Perrin,

More information

LIQUOR POLICY REFORM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

LIQUOR POLICY REFORM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA LIQUOR POLICY REFORM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA A Presentation to MLA John Yap Parliamentary Secretary to British Columbia Minister of Justice and Attorney General for Liquor Policy Reform Andrew Murie Chief

More information

Regulating Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products More Effectively

Regulating Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products More Effectively PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY CHANGE Regulating Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products More Effectively The legal information and assistance provided in this webinar does not constitute legal advice or legal representation.

More information

BERMUDA TOBACCO CONTROL ACT : 56

BERMUDA TOBACCO CONTROL ACT : 56 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA TOBACCO CONTROL ACT 2015 2015 : 56 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Citation Interpretation PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 PROHIBITION ON SMOKING Prohibition on smoking

More information