A Longitudinal Analysis of Unaided Smoking Cessation
|
|
- Miranda Summers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1988, Vol. 56, No. 5, Copyright 1988 by the American Psychological Association, Inc X/88/S00.73 A Longitudinal Analysis of Unaided Smoking Cessation G. Alan Marlatt, S. Curry, and L R. Gordon University of Washington A sample of 15 3 smokers who attempted to quit smoking without treatment was followed for 2 years. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 month, 4 months, 1 year, and 2 years postquit. A subsample of 69 individuals was also interviewed prior to their quit date. The majority of participants (77%) achieved at least 24 hr of abstinence by the 1-month follow-up. However, subsequent relapse rates were high: Only 13% of the sample was abstinent at 1 year, and 19% reported abstinence at the 2-year follow-up. Variables related to short-term outcome were generally unrelated to long-term outcome. Individuals who succeeded at initial cessation were more likely to be men and to be lighter smokers. Among those who initially quit, abstainers at 1 month were less likely to have participated in prior treatment, to report smokers among their friends, and to live with other smokers. At 2 years, abstainers were younger and had smoked for fewer years. The use of multiple strategies for cessation was associated with abstinence at the 2-year follow-up. A strong motivation to quit was found to be important for both initial success and long-term maintenance. Over 90% of the estimated 37 million people who have stopped smoking in this country since the Surgeon General's first report linking smoking to cancer have done so unaided (American Cancer Society, 1986). Survey data show that about one third of all current smokers make a quit attempt at least once per year and that only about one fifth of these succeed in any single attempt (Harris, 1980). Despite the preponderance of self-quitters, research on smoking cessation has typically focused on the evaluation of clinic-based treatment procedures (Lichtenstein, 1982). In a comprehensive review of smoking cessation studies published between , Schwartz (1987) reported that people who quit on their own appeared to succeed 16-20% of the time (success defined as abstinence at 1 year, based on 11 studies with a median 18% 1-year quit rate). Par treatment-aided subjects, the 1-year quit rates ranged from 5% to 88%; the median (for 405 studies reviewed) was 26% abstinent at 1 year (Schwartz, 1987). As Schachter (1982) argued, however, the treatment-aided cessation rate may be lower than the self-quit rate because those seeking formal treatment programs are often those who have made unsuccessful prior quit attempts. Perri was among the first to identify the self-control strategies (e.g., stimulus control and self-reward techniques) used by individuals who succeeded in their self-initiated attempts to stop smoking or to modify other addictive behaviors (Perri, 1985; Perri, Richards, & Schultheis, 1977). Similarly, Shiftman (1984) highlighted the exsmoker's method of coping with temptation and urges as a critical factor in maintaining abstinence. In addition, Prochaska and colleagues have postulated that unaided exsmokers use a variety of change processes (e.g., consciousness raising and self-liberation) as they pass through This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant RO1 DA02572 to G. Alan Marlatt. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to G. Alan Marlatt, Department of Psychology, NI-25, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington stages in the self-change process (DiClemente & Prochaska, 1985; Prochaska, DiClemente, Velicer, Ginpil, & Norcross, 1985). Until recently, the literature on unaided smoking cessation has been characterized by relatively small-scale studies, many with methodological weaknesses such as reliance on retrospective self-reports and the use of small and unrepresentative samples (e.g., Baer, Foreyt, & Wright, 1977; Guilford, 1972; Pederson & Baskerville, 1983). However, two recent studies have used a prospective follow-up design. Glasgow, Klesges, Mizes, and Pechacek (1985), who followed participants in a communitywide stop-smoking contest, showed that 37-41% of the subjects reported abstinence throughout the month-long contest. Discriminant function analyses showed that the only variable that prospectively predicted success was degree of perceived stress, which was assessed prior to quitting. Gritz, Carr, and Marcus (in press) conducted a 1-year follow-up study of over 500 smokers who either made a New Year's resolution to quit or who quit in response to the Great American Smokeout sponsored by the American Cancer Society. Results showed the proportion of subjects abstinent at each follow-up period to be relatively stable over time, with a 1-year rate of 25% (although continuous abstinence rates gradually declined to 11% by 1 year). Compared with relapsers, those who were successful at 1 year were less dependent smokers who were highly motivated to stop, were confident of their ability to do so, and were committed to quitting. The present study also used New Year's resolutions as a naturalistic arena for assessing self-initiated attempts to quit smoking (cf. Marlatt & Kaplan, 1972; Norcross, Ratrin, & Payne, in press). All participants were assessed following an attempt to quit and at periodic intervals during a 2-year follow-up period; a subsample of participants was also assessed prior to their quit attempts. Subject Recruitment Method In the month before New Year's Day, public service newspaper and radio ads were used to recruit smokers who planned to quit smoking as 715
2 716 G. MARLATT, S. CURRY, AND J. GORDON a New Year's resolution. A total of 227 individuals responded to the recruitment ads. Because staff and time constraints prevented us from contacting all prospective subjects, 40% (n = 95) were contacted before their quit date, and the remaining 60% (n = 132) were contacted approximately 1 month after their quit date. For the first group, 69 individuals were interviewed prior to their quit date. Of the 26 individuals in this group who were not enrolled in the study, 14 could not be reached, 3 wanted treatment, 3 were ineligible because they smoked a pipe or cigars, 4 individuals had already quit smoking, and 2 were uninterested after the study was described to them. Of the 132 subjects in the latter group, 84 actually enrolled in the study. The remaining 48 individuals were not enrolled because 30 people could not be reached, 11 were not interested after the study was described to them, 4 had quit prior to December 31,2 smoked a pipe or cigars, and 1 had enrolled in a treatment program. Thus, the final longitudinal sample consisted of 153 subjects (69 assessed before and 84 assessed after quitting). The sample, which was 44% male, averaged years of age (SO = 18.85). A majority (90%) of the sample were high school graduates, and 76% had attended college. Seventy-five percent of the sample were employed, 14% reported incomes under $10,000 per year, and 34% reported incomes over $30,000 per year. Subjects reported that they had smoked for an average of years (SD = 13.17), with an average smoking rate of cigarettes per day (SD = 12.80). Twenty-seven percent of the sample had participated in prior treatment, and an average of 3.15 prior quit attempts (SD = 6.28) were reported by the sample as a whole. Assessment of Smoking Outcomes Smoking status was obtained 1 month, 4 months, 1 year, and 2 years after the January 1 quit date. Collateral verification of reported abstinence was obtained at the 1-month follow-up. The 1-month structured interview was conducted by phone. At 4 months, all subjects were mailed questionnaires to ascertain their smoking status. More detailed, structured telephone interviews, during which descriptions of specific high-risk situations and coping strategies were obtained, were conducted only with subj ects who were abstainers or who had changed their smoking status since the 1-month follow-up. The 1- and 2-year followups were sent by mail, and nonresponders were subsequently contacted by telephone. All telephone interviews were standardized and were conducted by senior-level undergraduate research assistants who were trained and supervised by the investigators. Assessment of Predictor Variables Demographic, smoking history, and social smoking environment data were obtained from all subjects at the start of their participation. Demographic variables included age, sex, education, employment status, and income. Smoking history variables included baseline smoking rate, number of years of continuous smoking, number of prior quit attempts, participation in prior treatment for cessation, longest period of prior abstinence, and reasons for wanting to quit smoking. In addition, subjects were asked whether they lived with any smokers and what percent of their friends and acquaintances were smokers. Descriptions of the characteristics of high-risk situations and of the strategies used to cope with those situations were obtained at the 1- and 4-month follow-ups. These data describing the characteristics of highrisk situations, coping strategies, and the relation of coping to outcome have been reported elsewhere (Curry & Marian, 1985). Additional predictor variables were assessed at the following time intervals. Prequit. Motivational, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy variables were assessed for the subsample of subjects who were interviewed prior to their quit date. Ratings (on a 10-point scale) were obtained for the following variables: desire to quit, expected difficulty quitting, expected difficulty maintaining nonsmoking, confidence in being abstinent in 3 months, confidence in being abstinent beyond 3 months, and confidence for being able to smoke a single cigarette postquit without relapsing. One-month follow-up. At 1 month, all subjects were assessed for the number of techniques used for quitting smoking, the number of highrisk situations reported, and the number of strategies used for coping with high-risk situations (asked only of subjects reporting one or more high-risk situations). Equivalence of Samples The sample of subjects recruited prior to their quit date was compared with the sample recruited 1 month after their quit date on several dimensions. There were no significant differences between the two samples on age, education, income, number of years of smoking, number of prior attempts to quit smoking, and longest length of prior abstinence. The samples differed significantly on two variables: sex and participation in prior treatment for smoking cessation. There was a larger percentage of women (65%) than men in the prequit sample, whereas men and women were more evenly represented in the postquit sample (48% women). A larger percentage of the prequit sample (39%) had participated in prior treatment compared with the postquit sample (17%). Analytical Strategies Results The results examine two general issues: (a) outcomes, including subject attrition, initial outcomes of quit attempts, and short- and long-term outcomes and (b) the quit process, including the stability of outcomes over time and factors predictive of outcomes. Prequit and postquit samples were combined only for comparisons that were unlikely to be influenced by the postquit interview. For data on outcome expectancies and confidence, analyses were confined to the sample interviewed prior to their quit date. Smoking outcomes were obtained by summarizing frequencies for various outcome categories (all subjects with missing smoking outcome data were conservatively coded as regular smokers). A stepwise discriminant analysis was used to explore factors predictive of outcome, including the variables of age, sex, income, employment, education, baseline smoking rate, number of years having smoked, prior treatment, number of previous quit attempts, percentage of friends who smoke, number of cohabitating smokers, number of techniques used for cessation, and number of high-risk situations reported. In all analyses, the maximum number of variables eligible to enter the discriminant function was preset to ensure a 5:1 ratio of the number of subjects in the smallest group to predictors, thus ensuring a minimum 10:1 ratio of total subjects to predictors (Tabachnick & Fidell, 1983). Separate discriminant analyses were conducted with the subset of subjects interviewed prior to quitting in order to assess the relation between prequit motivations, expectations, and outcome. Hierarchical stepwise regression analyses were used, with predictors identified in the entire sample entered first, followed by the motivation and expectancy variables assessed for the prequit subsample; this analysis was designed to assess whether cognitive variables provided predictive power beyond that of demographic and smoking history variables for both pre- and postquit subjects. For all discriminant analyses reported, minimization of Wilks's lambda was the selection criterion; no additional variables were entered into
3 UNAIDED SMOKING CESSATION 717 the analysis when F ratios to enter the equation failed to exceed 1.00 for each remaining variable. Subject Attrition Of the 153 subjects who enrolled in the study, all subjects (100%) provided data at the first follow-up, 142 (93%) responded to the first two follow-ups, (75%) responded to the first three follow-ups, and 8 5 (55%) responded to all four assessments over the 2-year follow-up periods. Subjects who did not complete all follow-ups were compared with those who did on demographic, smoking history, and smoking outcome data. Overall, the two groups differed only in age. Subjects who completed all of the follow-ups were significantly older than those who did not (mean ages = and years, respectively), 3.24,p= MONTH FOLLOW-UP MONTH FOLLOW-UP Outcome of Quit Attempts At each follow-up, subjects were classified into four categories: (a) abstainers included subjects who had not smoked any cigarettes for at least 30 days prior to the present follow-up (for the 1-month follow-up, abstainers were subjects who had not smoked any cigarettes from their quit date); (b) slippers included subjects who were primarily abstinent but had smoked no more than one or two cigarettes since the previous followup; (c) relapsers included subjects who had quit smoking for at least 24 hr but subsequently returned to regular smoking or who were unable to maintain abstinence for at least 30 days; and (d) never quitters included subjects who did not quit smoking for at least 24 hr. Figure 1 summarizes the percentages of subjects in each category for the four follow-ups. As noted previously, at the I- and 2-year follow-ups, smoking status data were obtained both by mail and by telephone. Telephone interviews were conducted only with subjects who did not return the mailed questionnaires. Comparisons of the ratios of abstainers to relapsers in the mail versus telephone responders indicated that abstainers were more likely to respond quickly by mail and that nonresponders were more likely to report regular smoking in the subsequent telephone interviews. For example, at the 2-year follow-up, 56 responses were mailed and 40 were obtained by telephone. A total of 38% of the subjects who responded by mail reported abstinence compared with 20% of those who responded by telephone. Initial outcome. Of the 153 subjects who intended to quit smoking, 35 (23%) were unable to quit for at least 24 hr by the 1 -month follow-up and were thus assigned to the never-quitter category. Short-term maintenance. Despite findings that over 75% of the participants quit for at least 24 hr, the majority relapsed within 4 months following initial cessation. As Figure 1 indicates, a 15% increase in the percentage of relapsers occurred between the 1- and 4-month follow-ups, along with a corresponding decrease in the percentages of abstainers and slippers. After subjects were eliminated who had never quit smoking, 53% of remaining subjects were abstainers (33%) or slippers (20%) at 1-month compared with 34% (19% abstainers, 15% slippers) at 4-months. After subjects with missing data were excluded, 48% were abstainers or slippers at 4-months. Collateral verification of abstinence at 1 -month provided 13 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP YEAR FOLLOW-UP Figure 1. Percentage of subjects in four outcome categories at followups (AB = abstainer; RE = relapser; SL = slipper; NQ = never quitter). strong support for subjects' self-reports. There was only one discrepancy between collateral and subject reports; this subject was reclassified as a smoker. Long-term maintenance. At the end of 1 year, 24% of all participants were classified as abstainers or slippers compared with 20% at 2 years. When subjects who never quit smoking were eliminated from the calculations, 31% of the participants were abstainers (17%) or slippers (14%) at 1 year compared with 24% (22% abstainers, 2% slippers) at 2 years. When subjects with missing data were excluded, 48% were abstainers or slippers at 1 year and 62% were abstainers or slippers at 2 years. Stability of outcome over time. We explored two questions regarding the stability of outcome over time. First, we were interested in the disposition of slippers over time, particularly in whether they ultimately stabilized as abstainers or relapsers. Second, we were interested in whether the similarities in outcome percentages between the 4-month and 1-year follow-ups indicated that smoking outcome had stabilized during that period. Table 1 summarizes the proportion of initial quitters who changed smoking status between consecutive follow-ups and from the 1-month to 2-year follow-ups. These percentages are also partitioned by the direction of the status change: positive (i.e., from slipper or relapser to abstainer and from relapser to slipper) or negative (i.e., from abstainer or slipper to relapser and from abstainer to slipper). Decomposition of the negative category shifts indicated that slippers were more likely than abstainers to report regular smoking at subsequent follow-ups. The relative proportions of abstainers and slippers who became relapsers between consecu-
4 718 G. MARLATT, S. CURRY, AND J. GORDON Table 1 Percentage of Subjects Changing Smoking Status for Selected Intervals Interval 1 month to 4 months 4 months to 1 year 1 year to 2 years 1 month to 2 years Proportion changing status Negative" Direction 8 Positive" Note. Percentages are presented for all subjects who achieved initial cessation (n 118); those with missing data were classified as relapsers. When the percentages were calculated only for subjects who provided data at all four follow-ups (n = 85), the percentages were very similar. For example, between the 1-month and 2-year follow-ups, 45.9% of subjects who provided complete data changed status, 34.8% in a negative direction and 11.1 % in a positive direction. ' Details on the composition of these percentages can be obtained from the first author. b Includes transitions from abstainer or slipper to relapser and from abstainer to slipper. Includes transitions from slipper or relapser to abstainer and from relapser to slipper. live intervals were 28.2% versus 67.5% (from 1 to 4 months), 31.8% versus 66.4% (from 4 months to 1 year), and 30% versus 50% (from 1 to 2 years). Overall, 59% of the abstainers and 91 % of the slippers at the 1 -month follow-up were classified as relapsers at the 2-year follow-up. Table 1 also indicates that the similarities in category percentages between the 4-month and 1-year follow-ups were due not to stabilization of smoking outcome during that interval but rather to equivalent proportions of subjects reporting positive and negative status changes. The positive category changes during this interval primarily comprised relapsers becoming slippers (11%); small proportions of the total sample also moved from relapsers to abstainers (1.7%) and from slippers to abstainers (2.5%). Factors Related to Outcome To explore factors predictive of smoking outcome, we first looked for variables that discriminated subjects who initially quit smoking for at least 24 hr from never quitters. Second, we explored relations between smoking outcome status at each follow-up and variables assessed prior to the follow-up. Quitters versus never quitters. Initial quitters (n = 118) and never quitters (n = 35) were compared on demographics (age, sex, income, employment, education) and smoking history (baseline smoking, number of prior quit attempts, prior treatment for cessation, longest prior abstinence, percentage of smoking friends, cohabiting smokers). A significant discriminant function was obtained (canonical R =.361), x 2 (5, N = 153) = 18.24, p <;.003, that correctly classified 69% of the cases (K =.261, p <,.007). Men were more likely to quit than women (82% of the men quit compared with 73% of the women). In addition, quitters were significantly more likely to be college graduates (43% of the quitters graduated from college compared with 23% of the never quitters) and to have incomes greater than $20,000 per year (66% quitters vs. 41 % never quitters). On the average, the quitters were older and smoked fewer cigarettes per day than the never quitters (mean age = vs years; mean number of cigarettes per day = vs ). In addition, quitters and never quitters who were interviewed prior to their quit date («= 69) were compared on rating scales for desire to quit and expected difficulty quitting. These variables entered the discriminant analysis after the five predictors discussed previously (sex, education, income, age, and baseline smoking), accounting for a 10% increment in variance and classifying 81 % of the subjects correctly. Quitters expressed a higher desire to quit and expected less difficulty quitting than never quitters (mean desire to quit = 8.81 vs. 7.67), Z(67) = 2.07, p =.042 (mean difficulty expected = 7.38 vs. 8.83), <(67) = -2.67, p =.011. Abstainers versus nonabstainers. Participants who initially quit smoking were categorized as either abstainers or nonabstainers at each follow-up. The abstainer category included subjects who had quit smoking and maintained abstinence for at least 30 days prior to the follow-up. Nonabstainers included all smokers, both slippers and relapsers. Separate discriminant analyses for smoking outcomes yielded significant functions for each follow-up period. Because the predictors of the 1- and 4-month and of the 1- and 2-year follow-ups were virtually identical, findings are summarized only for the 1 -month and 2-year outcomes. At 1 month, it was found that a smaller percentage of abstainers than smokers had participated in prior treatment for smoking cessation (12% vs. 32%). Compared with nonabstainers, abstainers were significantly more likely to report that less than 25% of their friends and acquaintances smoked cigarettes (80% vs. 54%), and a significantly smaller proportion of abstainers lived with other smokers (26% vs. 72%). On the average, abstainers had smoked slightly longer than nonabstainers (19.07 vs years). The function (canonical R =.337), x 2 (4, N = 118)= , p 2,.006, correctly classified 67% of the cases (K =.250, p A.01). None of the motivation or expectancy variables for subjects interviewed prior to their quit date predicted outcome at 1 month. At the 2-year follow-up, abstainers were significantly younger (35.78 vs years) and averaged fewer years of smoking than smokers (15.52 vs years), and abstainers reported significantly lower incomes (32% vs. 42% reported incomes greater than $30,000 per year). In addition, at the 1-month interview, abstainers reported using more strategies to quit smoking (mean strategies = 2.00 vs. 1.46). The function (canonical =.436),x 2 (5,W = 118)= 14.90,/><;. 01, correctly classified 68% of the cases (K =.30, p <:.01). Abstainers at 2 years had reported a significantly higher desire to quit smoking than had nonabstainers (Ms = 9.70 and 8.43, respectively), «(45) = 2.05, p =.047, for subjects who were interviewed prior to their quit date. Prequit motivation accounted for 12% more of the variance, and 78% of subjects were correctly classified when it was entered into the analysis after the five other predictors. Discussion This study shows that individuals who attempt to quit smoking on their own are reasonably successful. The outcome percentages compare favorably with existing quit-rate data. The 26% median success rate for aided quitters reported by
5 UNAIDED SMOKING CESSATION 719 Schwartz (1987) is similar to what we found for unaided quitters (24%) at 1 year. This figure must be considered conservative, moreover, because we included never-<]uitters in our study sample. The outcome percentages were considerably lower than those obtained for a series of attempts over a longer time period (Schachter, 1982). Various characteristics of our self-quitter group may have contributed to these smoking outcomes. In our study, 26% of the total sample indicated that they had participated in prior treatment for smoking cessation compared with less than 10% who have sought treatment according to national figures (Raw, 1975). Smokefs with a past history of treatment may constitute a more difficult or recalcitrant sample than those without a treatment history. Our data clearly indicate that smoking cessation and maintenance are fluid processes, with many subjects moving in and out of abstinence. Only 53% of the subjects maintained the same smoking status from the first to the last follow-up. As Table 1 indicates, many participants changed smoking status. Between the 4-month and 1-year follow-ups, almost the same percentage switched from relapser to abstainer or slipper (15%) as those who switched from abstainer or slipper to relapser (16%). There does not appear to be a discrete threshold period for successful quitting during the first year, although the relapse rate appears to stabilize to some extent dijring the second year (12% switched from abstainer to relapser; 5% switched from relapser to abstainer). These findings indicate that "dipstick" follow-ups, in which the overall percentage of abstainers and relapsers is assessed at fixed intervals following cessation, provide limited insight into individual differences in the maintenance process (cf. Marlatt, 1983). In our analysis of predictors of outcome, variables related to short-term outcome were generally unrelated to long-term outcome and vice-versa, suggesting separate short- and longterm processes in the cessation process (DiClemente & Prochaska, 1985). The importance of motivation associated with initial cessation is highlighted by the finding that participants who were successful in initial quitting reported a significantly higher desire to quit than that reported by never quitters. In addition, among those who were successful in initial quitting, those who remained abstinent at the 2-year follow-up indicated a significantly higher desire to quit than those who relapsed. These results suggest that motivational screening or interventions to enhance self-efficacy may be a helpful adjunct for selfquitters in the prequit stage. Our findings of factors that predict outcome for self-quitters concur with the factors outlined by Pechacek and Danaher (1979) in their summary of retrospective studies of unaided smoking cessation. These findings show that (a) individuals who succeed at initial cessation are more likely to be men and to be light smokers; (b) individuals who are able to maintain abstinence are less likely to have participated in prior treatment and have made fewer prior attempts to quit; and (c) individuals who are abstinent at the second year of follow-up report using significantly more coping strategies than do relapsers (in line with earlier findings that successful quitters use more techniques for cessation). This study is exploratory and was designed to provide preliminary data about the process and outcome of unaided smoking cessation. Only some of the data were collected in a fully prospective design because we interviewed some subjects before quitting and some after quitting. It is possible, therefore, that the willingness of postquit subjects to participate was influenced by their success or failure at initial cessation. Choosing an arbitrary quit date (New Year's Day) may also have been a biasing factor because it excluded the study of individuals who quit as a result of a more salient event (e.g., being told by a physician to quit smoking). Another potential drawback is that smoking data were based on self-reports by subjects. Because of the high level of agreement between self-reports and collaterals at the 1 -month followup and our desire to be as unobtrusive as possible, we did not require collateral verification at subsequent follow-ups. Because a large proportion of initial abstainers reported subsequent smoking, there did not appear to be an attempt to fabricate continued abstinence during the study. We chose not to include a biochemical measure of smoking (e.g., saliva test) because we felt that advance knowledge by the subjects concerning the administration of such a test might provide an additional motive to quit, which would be a motivational boost not experienced by the typical self-quitter. Of course, simply being part of a university-based study with multiple planned follow-ups may have had a selective impact on subjects' motivation to succeed (Glasgow etal., 1985). Prospective outcome data from unaided quitters provide a natural history of smoking cessation that can provide normative data against which treatment outcomes can be compared. For a treatment program to be shown effective, it should show a success rate that is at least as effective (or significantly more effective) than the rate for unaided quitters. These data may also provide an empirical basis for determining the dividing point between the cessation and maintenance stages of habit modification. Such knowledge could be used to tailor the timing and types of interventions to specific stages in the change process (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983). Relapse prevention strategies (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985; Shiftman, Read, Maltese, Rapkin, & Jarvik, 1985) are probably best suited to the maintenance stage. Skill training for resisting temptations to smoke and for coping with possible setbacks or slips appears to be important in the early stages of quitting. References American Cancer Society. (1986). Cancer facts and figures. New York: Author. Baer, P. E., Foreyt, J. P., & Wright, S. (1977). Self-directed termination of excessive cigarette use among untreated smokers. Journal cf Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 8, Curry, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Unaided quitters' strategies for coping with temptations to smoke. In S. Shiftman & T. Wills (Eds.), Coping and substance use (pp ). New \brk: Academic Press. DiClemente, C. C., & Prochaska, J. O. (1985). Processes and stages of self-change: Coping and competence in smoking behavior change. In S. Shiffman & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping and substance use (pp ). New York: Academic Press. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, R. C., Mizes, J. S., & Pechacek, T. F. (1985). Quitting smoking: Strategies used and variables associated with success in a stop-smoking contest. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, Gritz, E. R., Carr, C. R., & Marcus, A. C. (in press). Unaided smoking cessation: Great American Smokeout and New Year's Day quitters. Psychosocial Oncology.
6 720 G. MARLATT, S. CURRY, AND J. GORDON Guilford, J. S. (1972). Group treatment versus individual initiative in the cessation of smoking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, Harris, J. E. (1980). Patterns of cigarette smoking. In Thehealth consequences of smoking for women: A report of the Surgeon General (pp ). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Lichtenstein, E. (1982). The smoking problem: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, Marlatt, G. A. (1983). The controlled drinking controversy: A commentary. American Psychologist, 38, Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (Eds.). (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New \brk: Guilford Press. Marlatt, G. A., & Kaplan, B. E. (1972). Self-initiated attempts to change behavior: A study of New Year's resolutions. Psychological Reports, 30, Norcross, J. C, Ratzin, A. C, & Payne, D. (in press). Ringing in the New Year: The change processes and reported outcomes of resolutions. Addictive Behaviors. Pechacek, T. F., & Danaher, B. G. (1979). How and why people quit smoking: A cognitive-behavioral analysis. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp ). New \brk: Academic Press. Pederson, L. L., & Baskerville, J. C. (1983). Multivariate prediction of smoking cessation following physician advice to quit smoking: A validation study. Preventive Medicine, 12, Perri, M. G. (1985). Self-change strategies for the control of smoking, obesity, and problem drinking. In S. Shiffman & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Coping and substance use (pp ). New York: Academic Press. Perri, M. G., Richards, C. S., & Schultheis, K. R. (1977). Behavioral self-control and smoking reduction: A study of self-initiated attempts to reduce smoking. Behavior Therapy, 8, Prochaska, J. Q, & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C, Velicer, W. F., Ginpil, S., & Norcross, J. C. (1985). Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. Addictive Behaviors, 10, Raw, M. (1975). Some issues in smoking modification research. British Association for Behavioral Psychotherapy Bulletin, 3, Schachter, S. (1982). Recidivism and self-cure of smoking and obesity. American Psychologist, 37, Schwartz, J. L. (1987). Review and evaluation of smoking cessation methods: The U.S. and Canada, (DHHS Publication No ). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Shiffman, S. (1984). Coping with temptations to smoke. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, Shiffman, S., Read, L., Maltese, J., Rapkin, D., & Jarvik, M. E. (1985). Preventing relapse in exsmokers: A self-management approach. In G. A. Marlatt & J. R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors (pp ). New \brk: Guilford Press. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983). Using multivariatestatistics. New York: Harper & Row. Received September 22,1987 Revision received February 3,1988 Accepted February 22,1988 Mineka Appointed Editor of Journal of Abnormal Psychology, The Publications and Communications Board of the American Psychological Association announces the appointment of Susan Mineka, Northwestern University, as editor of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology for a 6-year term beginning in As of January 1, 1989, manuscripts should be directed to Susan Mineka Northwestern University Department of Psychology 102 Swift Hall Evanston, Illinois Manuscript submission patterns for the Journal of Abnormal Psychology make the precise date of completion of the 1989 volume uncertain. The current editor, Don Fowles, will receive and consider manuscripts until December 31, Should the 1989 volume be completed before that date, manuscripts will be redirected to Mineka for consideration in the 1990 volume.
Quitting Smoking: Strategies Used and Variables Associated With Success in a Stop-Smoking Contest
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1985, Vol. 53. No. 6. 905-912 Copyright 1985 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-006X/85/S00.75 Quitting Smoking: Strategies Used and Variables
More informationThe Process of Smoking Cessation: An Analysis of Precontemplation, Contemplation, and Preparation Stages of Change
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991, Vol. 59, No. 2,295-304 Copyright 1991 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-006X/91/$3.00 The Process of Smoking Cessation: An Analysis
More informationSnowball sampling by mail: application to a survey of smokers in the general population
International Epidemiological Association 2000 Printed in Great Britain International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:43 48 Snowball sampling by mail: application to a survey of smokers in the general
More informationToward a Comprehensive Model of Change
Skip Toward to main a content comprehensive model of change SpringerLink Search SpringerLink Submit Home Log in Treating Addictive Behaviors pp 3-27 Cite as Toward a Comprehensive Model of Change Authors
More informationPreventing Relapse among Problem Gamblers using a Minimal Intervention
Preventing Relapse among Problem Gamblers using a Minimal Intervention David Hodgins, Shawn Currie, Nady el-guebaly and Katherine Diskin University of Calgary funding provided by the National Center for
More informationDebunking Myths About Self-Quitting
Debunking Myths About Self-Quitting Evidence From 10 Prospective Studies of Persons Who Attempt to Quit Smoking by Themselves Sheldon Cohen Edward Lichtenstein James O. Prochaska Joseph S. Rossi Ellen
More informationAttributions affect and self-efficacy: Validation of the Abstinence Violation Effect with abstinent slipabstinent
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1991 Attributions affect and self-efficacy: Validation of the Abstinence
More informationStage Based Interventions for Tobacco Cessation
Precontemplation Stage Based Interventions for Tobacco Cessation Relapse Contemplation Preparation Action Maintenance Theoretical and practical considerations related to Movement through the Stages of
More informationSample Evaluation Plan. Indicator 4.1.1
Sample Evaluation Plan Indicator 4.1.1 Number of culturally and linguistically appropriate behavior modification-based tobacco cessation services that are available and well utilized in the community Objective:
More informationExtensive research has documented the determinants of
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH 2002; 12: 302 307 Cigarette smoking and stages of change among men and women in Kiev, Ukraine JENNA M. MCALLISTER, GORDON B. LINDSAY, RAY M. MERRILL, UGO A. PEREGO * 302
More informationPsychotherapy Volume 38/Winter 200I/Number 4
Psychotherapy Volume 38/Winter 200I/Number 4 STAGES OF CHANGE JAMES O. PROCHASKA University of Rhode Island Empirical research on the stages of change has taken a number of tacks over the past 20 years.
More informationTobacco Use & Multiple Risk Factors:
Overview Tobacco Use & Multiple Risk Factors: Opportunities & for Concurrent Behavior Change Relation between mental health, physical health, and health behaviors Relation between tobacco and other health
More informationClearing the Air: What You Need to Know and Do to Prepare to Quit Smoking. Getting Ready to Quit Course
Clearing the Air: What You Need to Know and Do to Prepare to Quit Smoking Getting Ready to Quit Course Sponsored by: American Lung Association of Maryland, Baltimore County Health Department & MDQuit Can
More informationDespite substantial declines over the past decade,
19 The journey to quitting smoking Margot Shields Abstract Objectives This article outlines smoking trends over the past 10 years among the population aged 18 or older. Factors associated with smoking
More informationHealth Behaviour Change: Applying Prochaska and DiClemente s Stages of Change Model
Health Behaviour Change: Applying Prochaska and DiClemente s Stages of Change Model Image Sources http://www.clevelandseniors.com/forever/100 smoker.htm http://bacontoday.com/bacon flavored diet coke/
More informationRELAPSE PREVENTION: AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW. David C. Hodgins University of Calgary October
RELAPSE PREVENTION: AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW David C. Hodgins University of Calgary October 4 2018 Alberta = 4 million people 16 casinos 7,000 slots, 350 tables 47 race tracks 6,000 VLTs 2100 Ticket lottery
More informationPredictors of quitting in hospitalized smokers
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (2003) 5, 215 222 Predictors of quitting in hospitalized smokers Harry Lando, Deborah Hennrikus, Maribet McCarty, John Vessey [Received 12 October 2001; accepted 8 August 2002]
More informationMichele Clements-Thompson and Robert C. Klesges University of Memphis Prevention Center. Harry Lando University of Minnesota
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998, Vol. 66, No 6, 1005-1011 Copyright 1998 by the Am n Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-006X/98/S3.0C Relationships Between Stages of Change in Cigarette
More informationAn Expert System Intervention for Smoking Cessation
Expert System for Smoking Cessation 1 An Expert System Intervention for Smoking Cessation Wayne F. Velicer James O. Prochaska Cancer Prevention Research Center University of Rhode Island Reference: Velicer,
More informationApplying Prochaska s model of change to needs assessment, programme planning and outcome measurement
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7, 4, 365 371 Applying Prochaska s model of change to needs assessment, programme planning and outcome measurement Kathryn Parker MA 1 and Sagar V. Parikh MD
More informationSeptember 14, 2018 James O. Prochaska, Ph.D.
More Effective and Inclusive Care by Combining Practices for Individual Patients and Entire Populations September 14, 2018 James O. Prochaska, Ph.D. Director and Professor Cancer Prevention Research Center
More informationRates and Predictors of Renewed Quitting After Relapse During a One-Year Follow-Up Among Primary Care Patients
ann. behav. med. (2015) 49:128 140 DOI 10.1007/s12160-014-9627-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Rates and Predictors of Renewed Quitting After Relapse During a One-Year Follow-Up Among Primary Care Patients Krysten
More informationProactive peer support by telephone to help women quit smoking
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH Theory & Practice Vol.11 no.3 1996 Pages 377-381 SHORT COMMUNICATION Proactive peer support by telephone to help women quit smoking Laura J.Solomon 1-2, Roger H.Secker-Walker
More informationMOKP COST CONTAINMENT GRANT FINAL REPORT
MOKP COST CONTAINMENT GRANT FINAL REPORT Project Title: Helping Recipients Ask: The Effectiveness of Improved Health Education on Increasing Living Donation. Applicant Name: Amy D. Waterman, PhD Address:
More informationEvaluating Smokers Reactions to Advertising for New Lower Nicotine Quest Cigarettes
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association 2006, Vol. 20, No. 1, 80 84 0893-164X/06/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.80 Evaluating Smokers Reactions to
More informationThe 5A's are practice guidelines on tobacco use prevention and cessation treatment (4):
Smoking Cessation Module Tobacco use is the single greatest preventable cause of chronic diseases and premature deaths worldwide. The Canadian Cancer Society reports that tobacco product use is responsible
More informationAmerican Addiction Centers Outcomes Study Long-Term Outcomes Among Residential Addiction Treatment Clients. Centerstone Research Institute
American Addiction Centers Outcomes Study Long-Term Outcomes Among Residential Addiction Treatment Clients Centerstone Research Institute 2018 1 AAC Outcomes Study: Long-Term Outcomes Executive Summary
More informationSubtypes of precontemplating smokers defined by different long-term plans to change their smoking behavior
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH Vol.15 no.4 2000 Theory & Practice Pages 423 434 Subtypes of precontemplating smokers defined by different long-term plans to change their smoking behavior Arie Dijkstra and Hein
More informationChanging for Life: Using the Stages of Change to Support the Recovery Process
Changing for Life: Using the Stages of Change to Support the Recovery Process Sara S. Johnson, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, Research & Product Development sjohnson@prochange.com Assessing your Readiness.
More informationTelephone Counseling for Smoking Cessation: Effects of Single-Session and Multiple-Session Interventions
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1996, Vol. 64, No. 1,202-211 Copyright 1996 by the American Psychological Association, li OC22-006X/96/S3. ix/96/$3.00 Telephone Counseling for Smoking Cessation:
More informationUsing the Stages of Change Model to Choose an Optimal Health Marketing Target
UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 3-16-2010 Using the Stages of Change Model to Choose an Optimal Health Marketing Target Paula Diehr University of Washington, pdiehr@u.washington.edu Peggy A. Hannon
More informationFundamentals of Brief Cessation Counseling Approaches
Fundamentals of Brief Cessation Counseling Approaches Jamie S. Ostroff Ph.D. Director, Smoking Cessation Program Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Co-Project Leader Queens Quits! Cessation Center
More informationInitiation of Smoking and Other Addictive Behaviors: Understanding the Process
Initiation of Smoking and Other Addictive Behaviors: Understanding the Process Carlo C. DiClemente, Ph.D. Director of MDQuit UMBC Presidential Research Professor Department of Psychology, UMBC diclemen@umbc.edu
More informationHeavy Smokers', Light Smokers', and Nonsmokers' Beliefs About Cigarette Smoking
Journal of Applied Psychology 1982, Vol. 67, No. 5, 616-622 Copyright 1982 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 002I-9010/82/6705-0616S00.75 ', ', and Nonsmokers' Beliefs About Cigarette Smoking
More informationText & Mobile Media Smoking Cessation Service for Young Adults in South Texas:
Text & Mobile Media Smoking Cessation Service for Young Adults in South Texas: Operation & Cost Effectiveness Estimation Ramirez, A.G., Chalela, P., Akopian, D., Muñoz, E., Gallion, K., Despres, C., Morales,
More informationChanges in Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day: Cross-Sectional and Birth Cohort Analyses Using NHIS
Changes in Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day: Cross-Sectional and Birth Cohort Analyses Using NHIS David M. Burns, Jacqueline M. Major, Thomas G. Shanks INTRODUCTION Smoking norms and behaviors have
More informationTreating Adult Marijuana Dependence: A Test of the Relapse Prevention Model
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994, Vol. 62, No. 1,92-99 Copyright 1994 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-006X/94/S3.00 Treating Adult Marijuana Dependence: A Test of
More informationDeclaration of Conflict of Interest. No potential conflict of interest to disclose with regard to the topics of this presentations.
Declaration of Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest to disclose with regard to the topics of this presentations. Clinical implications of smoking relapse after acute ischemic stroke Furio
More informationHow Can Employers Make a Difference
PATHWAYS TO SUCCESSFUL HEALTH BEHAVIOR CHANGE: How Can Employers Make a Difference CARLO C. DICLEMENTE, Ph.D. University of Maryland, Baltimore County www.umbc.edu/psych/habits www.mdquit.org diclemen@umbc.edu
More informationIndepen dent Study On Program Effective ness
Indepen dent Study On Program Effective ness This report was prepared by the Davis-Valente Group in cooperation with the Johns Hopkins University. (NOTE: Graphs have been removed to increase Internet load
More informationExploring Predictors of Relapse and Maintenance Among Smokers
University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2013 Exploring Predictors of Relapse and Maintenance Among Smokers N. Simay Gokbayrak University of Rhode Island, simaygokbayrak@gmail.com
More informationIntroduction, Summary, and Conclusions
Chapter 1 Introduction, Summary, and Conclusions David M. Burns, Lawrence Garfinkel, and Jonathan M. Samet Cigarette smoking is the largest preventable cause of death and disability in developed countries
More informationFirst Annual Tobacco Study
Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene First Annual Tobacco Study Cigarette Restitution Fund Program Tobacco Use Prevention and Cessation Program September, 2002 Table of Contents Page Executive
More informationThis article was originally published in a journal published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author s benefit and for the benefit of the author s institution, for non-commercial
More informationDr. Robert Williams Faculty of Health Sciences & Alberta Gambling Research Institute University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada November 2015
ETIOLOGY OF PROBLEM GAMBLING: Results from the Major Canadian Longitudinal Studies Dr. Robert Williams Faculty of Health Sciences & Alberta Gambling Research Institute University of Lethbridge, Alberta,
More informationSelf-help Smoking Cessation and Maintenance Programs: A Comparative Study with 12-month Follow-Up by the American Lung Association
Self-help Smoking Cessation and Maintenance Programs: A Comparative Study with 12-month Follow-Up by the American Lung Association ANNE L. DAVIS, MD, RICHARD FAUST, MPHIL, AND MARTINE ORDENTLICH, BA Abstract:
More informationSmoking Cessation Counselling
Smoking Cessation Counselling Results of a 2005 Survey of Quebec DENTAL HYGIENISTS Michèle Tremblay, Daniel Cournoyer, Jennifer O Loughlin,, Université de Montréal INTRODUCTION More than 13,000 men and
More informationImpact of UNC Health Care s Tobacco-Free Hospital Campus Policy on Hospital Employees
Impact of UNC Health Care s Tobacco-Free Hospital Campus Policy on Hospital Employees February 5, 2008 Prepared for: UNC Health Care Prepared by: UNC School of Medicine Nicotine Dependence Program For
More informationCONTROL OF IMPULSIVE CHOICE THROUGH BIASING INSTRUCTIONS. DOUGLAS J. NAVARICK California State University, Fullerton
The Psychological Record, 2001, 51, 549-560 CONTROL OF IMPULSIVE CHOICE THROUGH BIASING INSTRUCTIONS DOUGLAS J. NAVARICK California State University, Fullerton College students repeatedly chose between
More informationCessation Pathways Exploring Opportunities for Developing a Coordinated Smoking Cessation System in Ontario
Generating knowledge for public health E V A L U A T I O N NEWS Cessation Pathways Exploring Opportunities for Developing a Coordinated Smoking Cessation System in Ontario Introduction The process of quitting
More informationPredictors of smoking cessation among Chinese parents of young children followed up for 6 months
Title Predictors of smoking cessation among Chinese parents of young children followed up for 6 months Author(s) Abdullah, ASM; Lam, TH; Loke, AY; Mak, YW Citation Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2006, v. 12
More informationCHAPTER 27: BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT OF DRUG ADDICTION
CHAPTER 27: BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS AND TREATMENT OF DRUG ADDICTION Fisher ch.27 Drug addiction is a very prevalent issue in the current United States society. The substance abuse treatments that are available
More informationSmoking Cessation Counselling
Smoking Cessation Counselling Results of a 2005 Survey of Quebec NURSES Michèle Tremblay, Daniel Cournoyer, Daniela Jukic, Jennifer O Loughlin,, Université de Montréal INTRODUCTION More than 13,000 men
More informationHelping Behaviors and Alcohol Use Disorders
Helping Behaviors and Alcohol Use Disorders Maria E. Pagano, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Psychiatry Case Western Reserve University Medical School Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program 1 This Lecture
More informationSmoking Cessation Counselling
Smoking Cessation Counselling Results of a 2005 Survey of Quebec RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS Michèle Tremblay, Daniel Cournoyer, Jennifer O Loughlin,, Université de Montréal INTRODUCTION More than 13,000 men
More informationTHE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Vol 117 No 1190 ISSN 1175 8716 Smoking in a New Zealand university student sample Kypros Kypri and Joanne Baxter Abstract Aims The aims of this study were to estimate the
More informationSmoking Reduction is the First Step Towards Smoking Cessation
Smoking Reduction is the First Step Towards Smoking Cessation Dr. SSC Chan 1, Prof. TH Lam 2, Dr. VT Wong 3, Mr. AYW Chan 4, Prof, AJ Hedley 2 1 Department of Nursing Studies, HKU LKS Faculty of Medicine
More informationA randomized trial comparing two Internetbased smoking cessation programs
A randomized trial comparing two Internetbased smoking cessation programs Jean-François ETTER Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland E-mail: Jean-Francois.Etter@unige.ch Acknowledgements
More informationNorthern Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey Northwest Territories Report. Health and Social Services
Northern Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey 2004 Northwest Territories Report Health and Social Services 1.0 Introduction The Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS) was initiated in 1999 to provide
More informationSmoking Harm Reduction: If Not Now When?
Smoking Harm Reduction: If Not Now When? K. Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH Medical University of South Carolina The E-Cigarette Summit Washington DC, April 30, 2018 Outline for my talk Historical context,
More informationApplying Behavioral Theories of Choice to Substance Use in a Sample of Psychiatric Outpatients
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1999, Vol. 13, No. 3,207-212 Copyright 1999 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 0893-164X/99/S3.00 Applying Behavioral Theories of Choice to Substance Use in a Sample
More informationMarketing a healthier choice: Exploring young people s perception of e-cigarettes
Marketing a healthier choice: Exploring young people s perception of e-cigarettes Abstract Background: As a consequence of insufficient evidence on the safety and efficacy of e- cigarettes, there has been
More informationEpidemiology of Hardcore Smoking: The Need to Advance the Field
Epidemiology of Hardcore Smoking: The Need to Advance the Field Gary A. Giovino, Ph.D Transdisciplinary Classification of Hardcore Smokers: How Shall We Define Hardcore? Symposium 10 th Annual Meeting
More informationBRIEF REPORT OPTIMISTIC BIAS IN ADOLESCENT AND ADULT SMOKERS AND NONSMOKERS
Pergamon Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 625 632, 2000 Copyright 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0306-4603/00/$ see front matter PII S0306-4603(99)00072-6 BRIEF
More information15 INSTRUCTOR GUIDELINES
STAGE: Former Tobacco User You are a pharmacist at an anticoagulation clinic and are counseling one of your patients, Mrs. Friesen, who is a 60-year-old woman with a history of recurrent right leg deep
More informationPhysicians for a Smoke-Free Canada. A look at young adults and smoking Findings from the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey
Fact Sheet Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada A look at young adults and smoking Findings from the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey The Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey is conducted annually
More informationLooking Beyond the Urban Core:
Looking Beyond the Urban Core: Tobacco-related Disparities in Rural Missouri Prepared for: Missouri Foundation for Health Prepared by: Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Washington University in St.
More informationBackground and Analysis Objectives Methods and Approach
Cigarettes, Tobacco Dependence, and Smoking Cessation: Project MOM Final Report Lorraine R. Reitzel, Ph.D., The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center Background and Analysis Objectives Background.
More informationChanging People s Behavior. Larry Wissow Professor Health, Behavior and Society Johns Hopkins School of Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this
More informationAttitudes and Beliefs of Adolescent Experimental Smokers: A Smoking Prevention Perspective
Attitudes and Beliefs of Adolescent Experimental Smokers: A Smoking Prevention Perspective By: Min Qi Wang, Eugene C. Fitzhugh, James M. Eddy, R. Carl Westerfield Wang, M.Q., Fitzhugh, E.C.*, Eddy, J.M.,
More informationYou Can Make a Difference!
You Can Make a Difference! How to help your clients become tobacco free What Does Smoking Cost Us? One study estimates that cost savings of between $1,142 and $1,358 per pregnancy can be achieved for each
More informationExamining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around a selfset. quit date. Urte Scholz. University of Zurich
Title Page with All Author Information Running Head: SOCIAL SUPPORT AND SMOKING Examining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around a selfset quit date Urte Scholz University
More informationSmoking and the Ø pattern; predictors of transitions through the stages of change
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH Vol.21 no.3 2006 Theory & Practice Pages 305 314 Advance Access publication 8 June 2006 Smoking and the Ø pattern; predictors of transitions through the stages of change E. F.
More informationExperiences of Relapse in Smoking Cessation
Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 2001 Experiences of Relapse in Smoking Cessation Natalie Kay D'Abrew Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation D'Abrew, N. K. (2001). Experiences
More informationInternational Quit and Win 1996: comparative evaluation study in China and Finland
Tobacco Control 2000;9:303 309 303 National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, S Sun T Korhonen A Uutela H J Korhonen (deceased)* P Puska Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Y Jun Anzhen
More informationExamples of what to say when intervening with smoking clients. Do you smoke cigarettes or tobacco at all, or have you ever smoked regularly?
Manual of Smoking Cessation Andy McEwen, Peter Hajek, Hayden McRobbie & Robert West 2006 by McEwen, Hajek, McRobbie and West Appendix 5 Examples of what to say when intervening with smoking clients Below
More informationMotivational Interviewing: Enhancing Motivation To Change Strategies
Motivational Interviewing: Enhancing Motivation To Change Strategies Learning Objectives At the end of this session, you will be able to 1. Describe the stages of change. 2. Demonstrate at least two methods
More informationRandomized controlled trial of physical activity counseling as an aid to smoking cessation: 12 month follow-up
Addictive Behaviors 32 (2007) 3060 3064 Short communication Randomized controlled trial of physical activity counseling as an aid to smoking cessation: 12 month follow-up Michael Ussher a,, Robert West
More informationOutcome Milestones in Smoking Cessation: An Organizational Framework. Deborah M. Scharf. BA, McGill University, 2000
Outcome Milestones in Smoking Cessation: An Organizational Framework by Deborah M. Scharf BA, McGill University, 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationCIGARETIE SMOKING AND BODY FORM IN PEPTIC ULCER
GASTROENTEROLOGY Copyright @ 1970 by The Williams & Wilkin. Co. Vol. 58, No.3 Printed in U.S.A. CIGARETIE SMOKING AND BODY FORM IN PEPTIC ULCER RICHARD R. MONSON, M.D. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard
More informationGeneral and smoking cessation related weight concerns in veterans.
University of Texas at El Paso From the SelectedWorks of Theodore V. Cooper 2006 General and smoking cessation related weight concerns in veterans. Theodore V. Cooper, University of Texas at El Paso M.
More informationWellness Coaching for People with Prediabetes
Wellness Coaching for People with Prediabetes PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH, PRACTICE, AND POLICY Volume 12, E207 NOVEMBER 2015 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Wellness Coaching for People With Prediabetes: A Randomized Encouragement
More informationThe Transtheoretical Model to Help Clients Thrive
The Transtheoretical Model to Help Clients Thrive James O. Prochaska, Ph.D. Director and Professor Cancer Prevention Research Center University of Rhode Island Founder Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
More information12-step participation among polysubstance users
12-step participation among polysubstance users Longitudinal patterns, effectiveness, and (some) mechanisms of action Alexandre B. Laudet, Ph.D Research Society on Alcoholism, June 2008, Washington DC
More informationChanging for Life: Using the Stages of Change to Support the Recovery Process
Changing for Life: Using the Stages of Change to Support the Recovery Process James O. Prochaska, Ph.D. Director and Professor Cancer Prevention Research Center University of Rhode Island Founder Pro-Change
More informationMotivational Interviewing in Chronic Diseases. Janelle W. Coughlin, Ph.D. Megan Lavery, Psy.D.. April 21, 2017
Motivational Interviewing in Chronic Diseases Janelle W. Coughlin, Ph.D. Megan Lavery, Psy.D.. April 21, 2017 Motivational Interviewing in Chronic Diseases Presenter Names: Janelle W. Coughlin, Ph.D. &
More informationQuit Rates of New York State Smokers
Quit Rates of New York State Smokers Sara M. Abrams, MPH Data Manager NYS Smokers Quitline Sara.Abrams@roswellpark.org September 6, 20 Presentation Outline Basic Quitline Service How Quit Rates are defined
More informationUMDNJ School of Public Health. Tobacco Dependence Clinic. Annual Report: 2003
UMDNJ School of Public Health Tobacco Dependence Clinic Annual Report: 2003 January 1, 2003 December 31, 2003 2 Tobacco Dependence Clinic at UMDNJ-School of Public Health: Summary Report 2001-2003 Introduction
More informationGreat American Smokeout November 15, 2018 Communications Toolkit
Great American Smokeout November 15, 2018 Communications Toolkit Welcome Since 1975, the American Cancer Society has hosted the Great American Smokeout (GASO), a public awareness event to encourage people
More informationRisk and Protective Factors for Youth Marijuana Use: Preliminary Findings
Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Marijuana Use: Preliminary Findings Analysis from the July 10, 2013 1 Purpose Examine youth marijuana use prevalence and frequency Identify the most salient risk and
More information9/17/15. Patrick Boyle, mssa, lisw-s, licdc-cs director, implementation services Center for Evidence-Based Case Western Reserve University
Patrick Boyle, mssa, lisw-s, licdc-cs director, implementation services Center for Evidence-Based Practices @ Case Western Reserve University 1 What changes are residents you serve considering? What changes
More informationSmoking Cessation in Primary Care: Implementation of a Proactive Telephone. Intervention. M. Nawal Lutfiyya, PhD 4. Research, Duluth, MN
Smoking Cessation in Primary Care: Implementation of a Proactive Telephone Intervention Cynthia A. McGrath, DNP; 1 Concetta Zak, DNP; 2 Kathleen Baldwin, PhD; 3 M. Nawal Lutfiyya, PhD 4 1 Department of
More informationEvaluating behavior change interventions in terms of their component techniques. Susan Michie
Evaluating behavior change interventions in terms of their component techniques Susan Michie Professor of Health Psychology Director, Centre for Behaviour Change University College London, UK ISBNPA conference,
More informationRelapse Prevention. Jennifer S. B. Moran, MA, TTS MFMER slide-1
Relapse Prevention Jennifer S. B. Moran, MA, TTS 2013 MFMER slide-1 Learning Objectives Describe cognitive, behavioral, and pharmacologic relapse prevention concepts that may be introduced early in a tobacco
More informationStrategic Approaches to Continuing Medical Education: Applying the Transtheoretical Model and Diffusion of Innovation Theory
Strategic Approaches to Continuing Medical Education: Applying the Transtheoretical Model and Diffusion of Innovation Theory Brian Russell, PharmD, Gerard Maher, 1 James O. Prochaska, PhD, 2 Sara S. Johnson,
More informationPerceived relative harm of e cigarettes and attitudes towards their availability, advertising and use: A longitudinal survey
Perceived relative harm of e cigarettes and attitudes towards their availability, advertising and use: A longitudinal survey Leonie S Brose a,b,c, Sara C Hitchman b,c, Jamie Brown b,d, Ann McNeill b,c
More informationMotivational Enhancement Therapy & Stages of Change
Motivational Enhancement Therapy & Stages of Change Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: 1) Identify the stages of change and how they can be implemented 2) Describe the principles of MET
More informationNatural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Dependence. Catriona Matheson Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, May 2015
Natural Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Dependence Catriona Matheson Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, May 2015 Key points The volume of the literature was large and the quality generally good.
More informationSmoking and Smoking Cessation in England 2011: Findings from the Smoking Toolkit Study
Smoking and Smoking Cessation in England 211: Findings from the Smoking Toolkit Study Robert West and Jamie Brown Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre University College London robert.west@ucl.ac.uk
More informationTobacco Use and Attitudes Survey. Montana Tech Students
2016-17 Tobacco Use and Attitudes Survey Montana Tech Students Contents Introduction 3 Survey Results 7 TUAS Results Overview 8 Tobacco Use on Campus 9 Attitudes and Behaviors of Tobacco Users 14 Campus-Wide
More information