DUI SERVICE PROVIDER ORIENTATION

Transcription

1 DUI SERVICE PROVIDER ORIENTATION Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Provided by the Institute for Legal, Legislative & Policy Studies Center for State Policy and Leadership University of Illinois Springfield

2 DUI SERVICE PROVIDER ORIENTATION DAY 2 AFTERNOON: DUI ASSESSMENT TOOLS

3 2016 IDHS DUI ORIENTATION ASSESSMENTS My Training Room Rules OR updated 10/2016 1

4 30 second introduction Who I am Where I work What I do How long I ve been in the field richard.krajewski@dupageco.org OR patricia@dielcounseling.com updated 10/2016 Assessment Tools Driver s Risk Inventory (DRI 2) Mortimer Filkins Adult Substance Use & Driving Survey Revised Illinois (ASUDS RI) Who uses the DRI? Who uses the M/F? Who uses the ASUDS? Who s thinking about changing tools? richard.krajewski@dupageco.org OR patricia@dielcounseling.com updated 10/2016 2

5 Driver s Risk Inventory DRI 2 BEHAVIOR DATA SYSTEMS BDS@BDSLTD.COM DRI 2 Features Normed on all (BDS recorded) DUI offenders BDS reviews data collected on an annual basis and updates test as needed (+ yearly summary) Includes gender specific norms Identifies attempts to fake or under report problems/concerns Measures DUI involvement and risk to public safety It is a valid instrument 3

6 Administering the DRI Questions Three sections of true/false and multiple choice Computer On line testing or flash drives Paper and pencil Interview IMPORTANT: A few minutes of oral instructions can put the client at ease while providing structure and clarifying expectations. Six Empirically Based Measures (Scales) Truthfulness Scale Alcohol Scale Drug Scale Driver Risk Scale Stress/Coping Abilities Scale Substance Use Disorder Scale (DSM 5) 4

7 DRI 2 Scales Truthfulness Scale measures how truthful the client was and identifies self protective, recalcitrant and guarded people who minimize or even conceal information. Alcohol Scale measures client s alcohol use and proneness to alcoholrelated problems. Drug Scale measures client s drug use and proneness to drug related problems. DRI 2 Scales (cont d) Driver Risk Scale measures the client s driving risk, independent from their involvement with alcohol/drugs. Helps identify the irresponsible/aggressive driver. Stress/Coping Scale measures the client s ability to handle or cope with stress. Severely impaired coping abilities are indicative of other identifiable emotional/mental health problems. 5

8 Risk Ranges Percentile Rank: Risk Range: 0 to 39 th percentile Low Risk 40 th to 69 th percentile Medium Risk 70 th to 89 th percentile Problem Risk 90 th to 100 th percentile Severe Risk > These Risk ranges are calculated individually for five of the six. > The Substance Use Disorder Scale is not scored as the others. Substance Use Disorder Scale Substance Use Disorder Scale a separate scale from the other five, and based on how many of the 11 DSM 5 criteria are endorsed. None or one = DNM or Low Two or three = Moderate Four or five = Problem Six or more = Severe ** DRI Risk Ranges vs. DASA Risk vs. DSM 5 severity scale ** 6

9 Special Scores When the Truthfulness Scale is at or above the 95 th percentile, all other scale scores (alcohol, drug, driver risk, and stress/coping) automatically go to the 99 th percentile. This is to alert the evaluator to a very high Truthfulness Scale score, which means the test results are inaccurate. What should you do? Retest If client s invalidate their DRI 2, it is recommended that they be given the opportunity to be retested. Review oral instructions before testing. Other option? 7

10 Driver s Risk Inventory QUESTIONS? Mortimer Filkins Assessment Tool RUDOLF G. MORTIMER, PHD. LYLE FILKINS (1973) 8

11 Mortimer Filkins Initially devised to identify problem drinkers from among dui offenders Initially validated against a general population Demonstrates high degrees reliability & validity Shown to be predictive of dui recidivism Information from the British Journal of Addiction, Vol. 85, Issue #11, November 1990 Mortimer Filkins Two parts: Interview and Test Pencil/paper only 58 Questions on Test 188 Questions in Interview Hand scored (using 3 scoring keys) 9

12 Questionnaire and Interview Summary Sheet Name: Number: Date: Questionnaire Score Key 1 Key 2 Page Page KEY TOTAL TOTAL Key 1 X 2 = Key 2 X 1= 9 (Subtract Key 2 from Key 1) Q = Questionnaire Score = 47 Interview Score Page Key Total Total Key 3X4= I Interview Score: Plus Questionnaire Score: 47 Final Total Score Q + I = TABLE 1 Revised (1973) Recommended Score Cut-Offs for DUI Client Classification Classification Scale Social Drinker Presumptive Problem Drinker Problem Drinker Questionnaire Only 11 or less or greater Interview Only 24 or less or greater Questionnaire and Interview Combined 39 or less or greater 10

13 Questionnaire and Interview Summary Sheet Name: Number: Date: Questionnaire Score Key 1 Key 2 Page Page KEY TOTAL TOTAL Key 1 X 2 = Key 2 X 1= 9 (Subtract Key 2 from Key 1) Q = Questionnaire Score = 47 Interview Score Page Key Total Total Key 3X4= I Interview Score: Plus Questionnaire Score: 47 Final Total Score Q + I =

14 TABLE 1 Revised (1973) Recommended Score Cut-Offs for DUI Client Classification Classification Scale Social Drinker Presumptive Problem Drinker Problem Drinker Questionnaire Only 11 or less or greater Interview Only 24 or less or greater Questionnaire and Interview Combined 39 or less or greater

15 Mortimer Filkins Yes, it s an acceptable tool per DHS/DASA, but 1) Only assesses Alcohol 2) Only validated on males, ages ) Has not been updated since 1973 Mortimer Filkins QUESTIONS? 11

16 THE ADULT SUBSTANCE USE AND DRIVING SURVEY REVISED (ILLINOIS) ASUDS RI Assessment of the Impaired Driving Offender DEVELOPED BY DR. KENNETH WANBERG AND DR. DAVID TIMKEN, OF THE CENTER FOR ADDICTION RESEARCH AND EVALUATION OVERALL GOALS OF TRAINING To provide an introduction in the use of the ASUDS RI in Differential Screening and assessment of impaired driving offenders within the framework of the Convergent Validation Model. 12

17 Definitions Differential Screening: Multidimensional (AOD) screening that measures the extent to which individuals are involved in various kinds of drugs and the extent of negative consequences or symptoms resulting from this involvement. Definitions (continued) Convergent Validation Model: Uses self report and other reports as valid representations of where the client is at the time of assessment. Self report Other reports 13

18 What are the Objectives of Screening and Assessment? 1. To provide an opportunity for clients to disclose their AOD use history, or tell their story ; 2. To give an opportunity to other sources to tell the story of how they interpret the client s AOD history; What are the Objectives of Screening and Assessment? (CONTINUED) 3. To determine the level of defensiveness based on the discrepancy between the self report and other reports 4. Estimate the true or valid condition of the client relative to past and recent AOD use, level of mental health problems and motivation for change and treatment 14

19 Sources of Data To achieve the above stated goals, the evaluator has two sources of data: 1) Self report 2) Other report data law enforcement, probation officer, family members, laboratory results, etc. * Both kinds of data are subjective Other report Data is: Double subjective, meaning Subject to different interpretations. Can be controlled if there is an established criteria for decision making which improves the evaluators reliability. 15

20 Self report Data is Essential It is a valid representation of client at assessment Client s willingness to self disclose View distortions as perceptual defensiveness A change in that view or increase in self disclosure means treatment is working reality is as client perceives it. We approach the world through the process of interpretation. We construct our own realities and form views of ourselves. 16

21 Self report data can be made more objective if: Collected in a standardized format Uses multiple variable measures to cancel out errors. The evaluator establishes rapport with client motivational interviewing From The Convergent Validation Perspective Self report is the baseline measure of the client s willingness to selfdisclose at the time of assessment Self report should not be reported as invalid, but rather indicative of the discrepancy between sources of data Reframe the view of lying, minimizing or denial as perceptual defensiveness. Getting valid and reliable data depends on building trust and rapport with the client, being up front as to how the data will be used, and communicating a positive regard for the client s self disclosure 17

22 Group Activity ASUDS RI General Overview and Description Self Report, differential screening instrument for impaired driving offenders ages 16 and older Self administered or interview administered Appropriate for individuals who are being processed through the judicial system for impaired driving 18

23 General Overview And Description Comprised of 113 self report items 13 Basic scales, and six (6) Supplemental scales Basic Scales #1 11 are normed on impaired IL driving offenders. Basic Scales #12 13 are normed on a clinical sample of AOD clients in IOP or Residential treatment. Supplemental Scales A,B,C are normed on the clinical sample. Supplemental Scales D,E,F are normed on the Illinois DUI offender. Guidelines For Using Self report Psychometric Tests Methods of test administration should be standardized Reading level of client should be checked Screening instrument should not be used for comprehensive assessment It is not ASAM. It is not a SUD diagnosis. 19

24 Guidelines (Continued) When using computerized scoring, evaluator should have knowledge of the test itself and not just rely on the computerized interpretation Clients should receive feedback from their assessment results compared to the normative group. ASUDS RI SCALES AND MEASUREMENTS 20

25 Teddy s Test 21

26 Teddy Trouble Alcohol Involvement (Items 1 13) Measures the extent of involvement in alcohol use. Measures low level of alcohol use patterns and problems, and many can be endorsed by the average drinker with no alcohol use problems. Is a reliable and valid measure of involvement in alcohol use, and, to some extent, abuse. Average drinkers will have raw scores in range of one to 10, as it is hard for clients to not provide low range affirmative responses. Teddy s score is 25 22

27

28 Teddy Trouble 20 25

29 2. Driving Risk (Items 14 25) General everyday driving situations Most DUI clients are reluctant to endorse these items because of perceived threat to loss of license Their scores increase on retesting when their responses are perceived to no longer be a threat to loss of license Those with a raw score of 10 or higher are being open about their driving habits and attitudes, but also represent a risk Teddy s score is 9 3. AOD Involvement (Items 26 35) Provides a measure of life time involvement in the 10 major drug categories Many multiple drug users may have not used some of the drugs recently, thus age of last use is an important variable Teddy s score is 9 23

30 4. AOD Use Benefits (1 3, 8, 13, 37 44) Measures the degree to which client reports using alcohol or other drugs for social and psychological benefits Good indication whether client is using alcohol or other drugs to manage depression, anxiety, feel good, be more sociable Moderate to high score suggests AOD psychosocial dependence Teddy s score is AOD Disruption1 (45 64) Broad measure of problems and negative consequences due to AOD use Focus is on disruptive signs and symptoms in relationship to drug use in general, not to any specific drug or drug category. High scores indicate AOD related loss of behavioral control, disruption of psychosocial functions, and disruption of social role expectations Teddy s score is 34 24

31 6. AOD Involvement 12 Months Before Arrest (26 35, 45 64) Same as Scale 3 (lifetime), but Broad measure of problems and negative consequences due to AOD use in 12 months prior to last DUI arrest Focus is on disruptive signs and symptoms in relationship to drug use in general in those 12 months BEFORE arrest After arrest, many clients go into a shape up mode and stop use. Teddy s score is Mood Adjustment Psychological Problems (65 73) A single dimension of psychological and emotional disruption High scores indicate depression, worry, anxiety, irritability, anger, feelings of not wanting to live, unable to control emotions About 20 percent DUI clients will score in range that indicates need for further evaluation for mood/psych problems Teddy s score is 10 Would Teddy benefit from a psychological evaluation? 25

32 8. Social legal Non conforming (81 106) Represents antisocial pattern, but should not be construed as measuring antisocial personality disorder (DSM 5) Has both static and dynamic items. The dynamic items measuring aggressive behavior and rebellious attitudes, and association with antisocial peers. Moderate to high scores indicate anti social patterns and character pathology, but also indicates openness to self disclosure and low defensiveness. Item 84 (..has been charged with DUI ) is good check for overall ASUDS RI response validity Teddy s score is 14 Look at criminal history? 9. Global AOD Psychosocial Disruption (Sum Scales 3, 5, 7, 8) Comprised of the sum of the four scales: AOD Involvement, Disruption1, Mood Adjustment, and Social Legal Non Conformity. Provides a global and overall measure of the degree to which client is indicating life functioning problems in the areas of substance use, mood adjustment and community compliance. This is the scale that represents the suggested risk classification. Teddy s score is 67 26

33 10. Defensive (9, 74 80, 84) Measures degree to which client is able to self disclose Comprised of statements to which almost all individuals can give a yes answer, even though it may be at a hardly at all level of response. It is a measure of social desirability; want raw scores between five and 19 Teddy s score is Motivation For Services And Change ( ) Reliable measure of degree to which client is motivated to seek help, to make changes, and to stop or to continue not to use alcohol or other drugs Low score on Motivation, Defensiveness, and Disruption could indicate client s AOD and other problems are truly in low range and that high level of treatment services not needed. This kind of profile should be corroborated with collateral data. Teddy s score is 13 How does this reflects his attitude or motivation? 27

34 12. And 13: Involvement 2 And Disruption2 Scale 12 = Scale 3, except... Scale 13 = Scale 5, except 12 & 13 are normed on clinical samples: intensive outpatient and inpatient AOD clients Allows comparison of client with own peers and vs. clinical sample Teddy s scores are 9 Involvement and 34 Disruption 28

35

36 A. Behavioral Disruption (45 50) Important to remember that this scale was normed on the clinical sample. Measures behavioral control loss and disruptions while under influence of drugs. High scores (decile ranges 8 10) may indicate client is at risk of harm to self or others when using, and can get out of control. Teddy s score is 11 Do you want to explore loss of control behaviors? B.Psychophysical Disruption (51 60) Also normed on the clinical sample. Measures degree to which client has experienced psychophysical symptoms associated with AOD intoxication or withdrawal. Can be life threatening, and high scores indicate past AOD dependence. Teddy s score is

37 C. Social Role Disruption (61 64) Final scale in this group normed on the clinical sample. Indicates degree to which the individual s AOD use has disrupted normal and expected social roles, e.g. job, obeying law, family responsibilities High scores can be associated with depression and discouragement High scores suggest need for life management skills and training in areas of employment and family skills Teddy s score is 7 which falls in the low medium range, but he is only 20 years old. D. Social Non conforming (81 92) Within the Community: Measure of past and current rebelliousness and even antisocial behavior and attitudes Those with moderate to high scores are open to self disclosure However, individuals with significant antisocial features and character pathology are often resistant to treatment. Teddy s score is 8 30

38 E. Legal Non conforming (93 106) Most of these items are static variables. Measures degree of involvement in the adult criminal justice system: Hx of arrests, convictions, time on probation/parole, and time spent in jail or prison. Most DUI clients will score zero or very low. About 70% will have a low raw score on this scale (4 or less). 10 th decile range scores on both scales D and E indicate significant problems and history of both antisocial and anti legal problems and may suggest a lifestyle pattern of social legal non conformity Teddy s score is 6 F. Social Legal Non Conforming 12 Months (89 106, last 12 Month Items) Measures recent legal problems. Over 70% of IL sample of DUI offenders will have a very low raw score (4 or less). Raw scores above 5 suggest client has had noteworthy if not significant involvement in social legal non conformity in the 12 months prior to their evaluation. Only 10 percent of Illinois DUI sample had a raw score of 8 or more. Some clients are willing to report recent involvement in the judicial system, but most DUI clients are quite guarded Teddy s score is 4. 31

39 ASUDS USER S GUIDE THE ASUDS RI DISK INCLUDES A COPY OF THE USER S GUIDE. PLEASE REFER TO THIS GUIDE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Make test instructions clear and include the following: Answer each question as honestly as possible as to how you see yourself Give only one answer to each question unless otherwise specified Results will be treated as confidential Results will be used to develop services most appropriate for you Results will be shared with you 32

40 Something to remember. Offender assessment is client centered and society centered. The safety and welfare of the client, others and the community are the number one priorities when determining level of service placement. Although the ASUDS RI provides useful guidelines for service placement, final service and treatment referral decisions are never made solely on the results of a self report instrument. All sources of data are used in making these decisions. ASUDS RI Questions? 33

41 THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING Driver s Risk Inventory (DRI 2) Mortimer Filkins Adult Substance Use & Driving Survey Revised Illinois (ASUDS RI) richard.krajewski@dupageco.org patricia@dielcounseling.com 34

42 DUI SERVICE PROVIDER ORIENTATION DAY 2 AFTERNOON: HANDOUTS DUI ASSESSMENTS

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61