Allen County Community Corrections. Home Detention-Day Reporting Program. Report for Calendar Years

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Allen County Community Corrections. Home Detention-Day Reporting Program. Report for Calendar Years"

Transcription

1 Allen County Community Corrections Home Detention-Day Reporting Program Report for Calendar Years Joseph Hansel, Ph.D. and Jacqueline Wall, Ph.D. Allen County Community Corrections 21 W. Superior Street Fort Wayne, IN 4682 Telephone:

2 Home Detention-Day Reporting Program Impact Evaluation Introduction The following report summarizes the major evaluation findings examining offenders placed in supervision via Home Detention-Day Reporting(HD-DR) programs by the Allen County Circuit Court. The report is designed with the following questions as organizing principles: 1. Who tends to enter the HD-DR? 2. What types of offenses are committed leading to referral to the HD-DR? 3. What level of risk do HD-DR offenders demonstrate? 4. How successful are offenders in completing the HD-DR? 5. What relationships exist between items 1-4 and program completion? 6. How frequent is recidivism and what form does that recidivism take? 7. What relationships exist between items 1-4 and recidivism? Allen County Community Corrections Description The mission of Allen County Community Corrections is to operate a community based program that provides services to offenders, persons charged with a crime or an act of delinquency, persons sentenced to imprisonment, or victims of crime or delinquency to meet the needs of the individual criminal offender, victims of crime and the community at large. HD-DR Purpose HD-DR serves offenders who are placed in supervision from both felony and/or misdemeanor court as a part of a sentencing agreement(s). Transfers from other felony and misdemeanor courts are also eligible for placement into the HD-DR program. All offenders placed in a HD-DR supervision component are directly referred from court as a stipulation of their sentencing and have not served time in a Department of Correction facility for the charges/convictions that place them into HD-DR. History of HD-DR Allen County Community Corrections initiated HD-DR programs on January 1, 24. Since this time, the program has served individuals with mental illness who experience recurrent arrest and incarceration for drug or alcohol related offenses. Preparation of this Evaluation Report The information presented in this report examines those who entered supervision, left supervision and completed the three year follow-up between January 1, 29 and December 31, 211. During this time, a total of 383 offenders entered supervision between January 1, 29 and December 31, 211. The number of offenders who completed supervision in HD-DR between January 1, 29 and July 14, 211 was 432. Five hundred and ninety one (531) offenders completed their 3 year post follow-up recidivism check between January 1, 29 and July 14, 211. The information used to prepare this report was extracted from the Allen County data base and provided to the evaluators on July 14, 211 and on March 22, 212. This data was used for the examination of all of the information provided in this report. It is important to know that this report, although looking at factors associated with individual offenders, is designed to assess outcomes at a programmatic level. As a consequence, information provided represents an 2

3 analysis of offenders under supervision at the three different time points intake, exit, and three-year recidivism and is not designed to follow an offender from entry into care until they exit and complete their post-supervision follow-up. Such an analysis will be provided in a separate document. It is also important to recognize that this report does not include information on offenders who were not accepted into supervision, and it is crucial to identify that those offenders accepted did not represent a random group of offenders being processed through the Allen County judicial system. In other words, as there is no contrast or control group available to serve as a comparison, it is challenging to claim without uncertainty that the outcomes are exclusively due to the programs implemented. This is especially true for samples seen at completion of supervision and at the three-year recidivism check, as it is not known how representative these samples are. That being said, the information has been examined in comparison to that which has been collected in the past, in an attempt to examine trends over time. 3

4 Summary of Evaluation Findings Home Detention-Day Reporting Offenders entering Home Detention Day Reporting (HD-DR) were on average, 31.2 years of age, with a range of just under 18 (17.3) to 83.8 years. 78.6% of offenders entering this supervision were male. 59.3% of HD-DR offenders were Caucasian, 3.8% were African American, 7.6% were Latino, 2.1 were Asian, and.3 were bi-racial. 71.8% of offenders starting HD-DR were single, 12.8% were married, 2.6% separated, 11.7% divorced and 1.% widowed. Offenders entering HD-DR were reported to have to 16 dependent children, with a median number of children of. 43.1% of those starting HD-DR had obtained a high school diploma and 25.1% completed a GED equivalency exam. Less than 1 in 2 (4.7%) had obtained degrees beyond high school and 25.8% had less than a high school diploma. Of those entering HD-DR between 29 and 211, 319% lived in quadrant 4, 25.3% in quadrant 3, 2.9% in quadrant 2, and 21.9% in quadrant % of those in this offender group had a primary diagnosis on Axis I. 84.7% of those diagnoses were related to alcohol or other substance abuse/dependence. Almost 1 in 8 (12.3%) received a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder or V code. About 1 in 5 (2.2%) were diagnosed with a primary diagnosis on Axis I with an anxiety disorder. 27.4% of those in this offender group had a secondary diagnosis on Axis I. 59.3% of those diagnoses were related to alcohol or other substance abuse/dependence. 21.6% received a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder or an anxiety disorder. 2.4% of the diagnoses given were classified as other (e.g., psychotic disorders, learning disorders, or V codes). On Axis II, 17.8% of offenders were given a primary diagnosis. Four (4) of 1 (4.%) evaluated received no diagnosis or were deferred. Of those given a primary diagnosis on Axis II, just less than 2 in 5 (37.1%) received a diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder. 12.3% were given a diagnosis of Borderline Intellectual Functioning. Nearly 3 of every 4 (73.4%) offenders were charged with Class D Felonies, 1 in 6 (16.8%) with Class C Felonies, and 1 in 23 (4.3%) with Class B Felonies. No offenders were classified with Class A Felonies/Murder charges. Over 1 in 38 (2.6%) were classified with Class A Misdemeanors. 4

5 34.7% of the offenders were charged with major driving offenses, 22.7% with drug offenses, 22.2% with property offenses, 13.1% with public order offenses, 7.% with violent offenses and.7% with sexual offenses. Risk of re-offense was measured in various ways. According to the IRAS, of those receiving a risk level IRAS score, over 1 in 3 (37.%) was found to have High or Very High Risk level of reoffending. According to the LSI-R, of those receiving a risk level, 89.3% were found to have at least a low/moderate level of risk to reoffend. Regarding program outcomes, 13.8% of those entering HD-DR from 29 to 211 were either still under supervision or had missing data. Using the entire sample, 46.1% successfully completed the program, 4.4% received new charges, 31.7% committed technical violations, 2.1% escaped, 1.2% were administratively released, and 1.4% were classified as other. Those who successfully completed their supervision were more likely to be older. Successful completion was positively related to being a member of the majority race, as was years of education. In addition, successful completion was more frequently seem among offenders with lower levels of risk. About 3 in 1 (31.8%) of all offenders who underwent a three year recidivism check during were rearrested. The offenders who were rearrested were noted to share a number of individual characteristics. These characteristics included receiving ratings of high on risk scales. 5

6 Section 1 Who tends to enter HD-DR?

7 Demographics of those entering HD-DR between 29 and 211 Latino, 7.6% Female, 21.4% African- American, 3.8% Gender Male, 78.6% Asian, Bi-racial, 2.1%.3% Caucasian, 59.3% The number of offenders entering HD-DR between 29 and 211 was 383. Offenders were on average 31.2 years of age (Standard Deviation [SD] = 11.), with a range of just under 18 years of age (17.3) to just under 84 years of age (83.8). A large majority of offenders were male (78.6%). About 3 in 5 (59.3%) were Caucasian, with about 3 in 1 being African-American (3.8%), 1 in 13 Latino (7.6%), 1 in 5 (2.1%) were Asian/Pacific Islander and less than 1 in 1 (.3%) were biracial. About 7 in 1 of the offenders were single (71.8%), about 1 in 8 were married (12.8%), 1 in 5 were separated (2.6%), 1 in 9 were divorced (11.7%), 1 in 1 were widowed (1.%). For these offenders, the median number of children reported was, with a range of -16 children. Married 12.8% Separated 2.6% Ethnicity Divorced 11.7% Widowed 1.% Single 71.8% About 7 in 1 (68.2%) of this group of offenders had obtained a high school diploma (43.1%) or a General Education Diploma (GED) equivalency exam (25.1%). A majority (82.9%) had attended school for 12 years or more. Less than 5 percent (4.7%) of those in the HD-DR program had obtained degrees beyond a high school diploma. 25.8% reported less than high school completed. Marital Status 7

8 Quad. 4, 31.9% Quad. 3, 25.3% Quad. 1, 21.9% Quad. 2, 2.9% Offenders were relatively evenly distributed across the quadrants of residence. Almost a third of the offenders (31.9%) came from quadrant 4. About 1 in 4 (25.3%) came from quadrant 3. About a fifth of offenders came from each of quadrant 1 (21.9%) and quadrant 2 (2.9%). Residence by Quadrants in Allen County 8

9 Mental Health and Substance Abuse/Use Conditions Axis I Missing Data, 64.2% Primary Diagnosis, 35.8% Offenders entering the HD-DR between 29 and 211 were evaluated for mental disorders using the DSM-IV criteria. Of the offenders in this sample using all of the data, 35.8% of offenders in the HD- DR received a primary mental health diagnosis on Axis I. The 64.2% of the group not receiving an evaluation were classified as missing data. Axis I Primary Diagnosis For offenders receiving a primary, Axis I diagnosis, the most common diagnosis (46.8%) was for alcohol use disorders. Almost 2 in 5 (37.9%) were received an Axis I primary diagnosis for substance abuse. About 1 in 25 (3.6%) were diagnosed with a mood disorder and about 1 in 5 (2.2%) were diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. V codes, adjustment disorders, and other diagnoses were given to about 1 in 11 (8.7%) of these offenders. Anxiety Disorder 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % 2.2% 8.7% 3.6% 37.9% 46.8% Other Disorder Mood Disorder Substance Abuse & Dependence Disorder Alcohol Abuse & Dependence Disorder Valid Axis I Primary Diagnosis 9

10 Of the total, 27.4% of offenders in the HD-DR received a secondary mental health diagnosis on Axis I. The 72.6% of the group not receiving an evaluation for secondary disorders were classified as missing data. Missing Data, 72.6% Axis I Secondary Diagnosis Secondary Diagnosis, 27.4% Of the offenders receiving secondary mental health diagnosis on Axis I, almost 2 in 1 were diagnosed with mood disorders (17.7%), less than 1 in 25 were diagnosed with anxiety disorders (3.9%), 1 in 1 were diagnosed with alcohol abuse and dependence disorders (1.5%), almost 5 in 1 were diagnosed with substance abuse and dependence disorders (48.8%), and 1 in 5 were diagnosed with other disorders (2.4%). 12% 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % 2.4% 48.8% 1.5% 3.9% 17.7% Other Disorder Substance Abuse & Dependence Disorder Alcohol Abuse & Dependence Disorder Anxiety Disorder Mood Disorder Valid Axis I Secondary Diagnosis 1

11 About 1 in 4 (28.5%) of those in this offender group had primary (14.7%) or secondary (13.8%) diagnoses of the Axis I disorders involving substance abuse or dependence. About 1 in 5 (19.5%) of those in this offender group had primary (16.7%) or secondary (2.8%) diagnoses of the Axis I disorders involving alcohol abuse or dependence. About 1 in 2 (6.5%) of offenders in this group had primary (1.4%) or secondary (5.2%) diagnosis of Mood Disorders. Just about 1 in 2 offenders were diagnosed with V-code disorders (4.9%), with 1.1% having a V-code disorder as a primary diagnosis and 3.8% having V-code disorders as a secondary diagnosis. The remaining groups of diagnoses were found in only 1-2% of the HD-DR sample and both primary and secondary totaled 5.9%. These included Anxiety Disorders (.8% primary, 1.1% secondary), Learning disorders (.6% primary), Adjustment Disorders (.3% primary, 1.1% secondary), and other (1.2% primary,.8% secondary). 3.% 25.% 2.% 15.% 32.4% 1.% 5.%.% 13.8% 2.8% 25.% 3.8% 5.1% 1.1% 1.4%.6%.3%.% 1.1% 1.1%.8% Secondary Primary.8% 1.2% Percentage of Offenders with Primary or Secondary Axis I Diagnosis 11

12 Axis II and Axis V Diagnoses Missing Data, 82.2% Primary Diagnosis, 17.8% Some of the offenders entering HD-DR between 29 and 211 were evaluated for Axis II mental disorders using the DSM-IV criteria. Of HD-DR offenders, 17.8% were evaluated for a primary mental health diagnosis on Axis II. For 82.2% of the group, the diagnostic data were missing. For offenders receiving a primary, Axis II Axis II Primary Diagnosis evaluation, 4 in 1 (4.%) offenders did not receive an Axis II diagnosis or the diagnosis was deferred, almost 2 in 5 (37.1%) were diagnosed with an Antisocial Personality Disorder, 1 in 8 (12.3%) received a Borderline Intellectual Functioning disorder diagnosis, and 1 in 1 (1.6%) received other personality disorder diagnoses. 1% 8% 6% 4% 2% % 1.6% 37.1% 12.3% 4.% Other Personality Disorder Antisocial Personality Disorder Borderline Intellectual Function No diagnosis or deferred Valid Axis II Primary Diagnosis 12

13 The Mean score on Axis V (Global Assessment of Functioning) of the DSM-IV (APA, 1999) for these offenders was 58.9 with a standard deviation of 11.. Scores in this range are typical of those who report moderate psychological symptoms and/or moderate impairment in social, educational, or occupational functioning. The GAF scores for the sample ranged from 11 to 81, suggesting a range of severely disturbed individuals to those relatively free from psychopathology. 13

14 Prevalence of Axis I Conditions 1.% 8.% 6.% 4.% 2.%.% 28.5% Substance Abuse Disorders 1.9% 18.6% 19.5% Alcohol Abuse Disorders 6.5% 2.8% 28.8% 1.9% 35.5% Mood Disorders Anxiety Disorders Any Disorder Prevalence of Axis I Conditions 46.4% HD-E General Population Note: In the above graphic, prevalence rates (in percentage of the population) for Axis I diagnoses within the HD-DR population are compared to lifetime prevalence rates in the general US population (Kessler et al., 25). Substance Use Disorders are 2.6 times more likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. Alcohol Use Disorders are 1.5 more likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. Mood disorders are 3.2 times less likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. Anxiety Disorders are 15.2 times less likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. These offenders are 1.3 times less likely to receive any Axis I diagnosis compared to the general population. 14

15 Prevalence of Axis II Conditions 36.8% Antisocial PD 3.% 1.9% Other PD 6.% 13.6% HD-E 2.1% Borderline Intellectual Functioning Prevalence of Axis II Conditions General Population Note: In the above graphic, prevalence rates (in percentage of the population) for Axis II diagnoses within the HD-DR population are compared to lifetime rates in the general US population (DSM-IV-TR, 2). Prevalence rates of Borderline Intellectual Functioning are estimated based upon normal curve equivalent. Antisocial Personality Disorder is 12.3 times more likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. Other Personality Disorders are 3.2 times less likely to be diagnosed in the HD-DR sample. Those in the HD-DR sample are 6.5 times less likely to receive a diagnosis of Borderline intellectual Functioning compared to the general population. 15

16 Section 2 What types of offenses are committed leading to referral to HD-DR? 16

17 Types of Offenses Committed The chart below shows the percent of primary offenses for offenders entering the HD-DR. The most frequent offense for this group was major driving offenses including DWI and habitual traffic violator with over 1 in 3 (34.7%) committing this type of offense. The second and third most frequent offences, drug offenses and property offenses were charged against about 1 in 5 (22.7% & 22.2%, respectively) of the offenders. About 1 in 8 (13.1%) HD-DR offenders were charged with public order offenses including resisting arrest and possession of a handgun. About 1 in 14 (7.%) of the offenders were charged with violent offenses like common assault and domestic battery. Less than 1 in 1 (.7%) were accused of sexual offenses. Primary Offense % Major driving offenses 34.7% Drug offenses 22.7% Property offenses 22.2% Public order offenses 13.1% Violent offenses 7.% Sexual offenses.7% The average number of prior Department of Correction (DoC) commitments for those entering HD-DR was.47 (SD=1.), with a range of -7. The Median number of prior commitments was. A majority (73.4%) of the offenders were charged with Class D Felonies, about 1 in 6 (16.8%) were charged with Class C Felonies and about 1 in 25 (4.3%) were charged with Class B Felonies. A little more than 1 in 5 (2.6%) of the offenders had been charged with a Class A Misdeameanor. B Felony, 4.3% A Misdmn., 2.6% C Felony, 16.8% D Felony, 73.4% Types of Offenses 17

18 Missing Data, 57.% Violent Crime Classifications Classified, 43.% The violence of crimes of about 4 in 1 (43.%) of the offenders entering HD-DR between 29 and 211 were classified. The remainder (57.%) was not classified and is shown as missing data. Of those classified, 2 in 5 (41.1%) committed crimes that involved violence but no victim, whereas about 1 in 2 (48.3%) involved violence against a victim. A smaller percentage of offenders (1.6%) were involved in sexual offenses. Sex Offender, 1.6% Violent No Victim, 41.1% Victim & Violent, 48.3% Valid Violent Crime Classifications 18

19 Section 3 What level of risk do HD-DR offenders demonstrate? 19

20 About 3 in 1 (3.3%) of HD-DR offenders were classified on the PCL-R risk evaluation. The rest were not and are shown on the chart below as missing data. Of the valid classifications over 9 in 1 (9.5%) of offenders were classified as low risk on the PCL-R. The remaining 9.5% were classified as high risk. Missing Data 69.7% Classified 3.3% Low risk 9.5% High risk 9.5% PCL-R Risk Classifications Client Risk Level PCL-R High risk, 33.1% Missing data, 66.8% IRAS Scores Very high risk, 3.9% Valid IRAS Scores Low risk, 2.5% Classified, 33.2% Low-mod risk, 3.1% Moderate risk, 39.4% Some offenders had IRAS scores recorded (n = 127, 33.2% of total cases). All others were classified as missing data (66.8%). Of offenders classified in HD-DR, over 1 in 3 (37.%) were considered to be at High Risk or Very High Risk of reoffending. About 4 in 1 were considered moderate risk (39.4%), about 1 in 32 (3.1%) were considered low to moderate risk, and about 1 in 5 (2.5%) were considered low risk IRAS Scores Mean SD Total at entry Criminal History Education, Employment, Finan Family and Social Support Neighborhood Problems Substance Abuse Peer Associations Criminal Attitudes/Behaviors Score on components of the IRAS are shown in the table above. Criminal attitudes and behavior had the highest mean score of 4.4 and a standard deviation of 2.2. The Mean score for criminal history was 3.3 (SD = 2.1). Scores on peer associations was 3.4 (SD = 1.5). Education, employment and financial situation had a Mean score of 3.3 (SD = 1.8), substance abuse 2.7 (SD = 1.5), neighborhood problems 1.6 (SD = 1.), and family and social support had a mean score of 1.5 (SD = 1.3). 2

21 LSI-R Scores Mean SD Criminal History Education, Employment Financial Family/Marital Accommodation.3.7 Leisure Activity Companions Alcohol/Drug Emotional/Personal Attitudes Total scores on the LSI-R were reported on 1 in 2 (55.9% of sample) of offenders entering HD-DR. The total Mean score was 23.5 (SD=7.4). Offenders in the HD-DR tended to have higher scores on the following scales: Criminal History, Education/Employment, Alcohol/Drugs, and Companions) suggesting these areas may be particularly problematic for those in the program. Missing data, 44.1% LSI-R Scores Classified, 55.9% About 11 in 2 (55.9%) of HD-DR offenders were classified on the LSI-R risk evaluation. The rest were not and are shown on the chart to the left as missing data. Of the HD-DR offenders classified on the LSI-R scale, 1 of 1 (1.7%) were scored as low risk, about 4 in 1 (38.8%) were at low to moderate risk, a little more than 1 in 3 (33.6%) were at moderate risk, 1 in 16 (6.1%) were considered at medium to high risk, and about 1 in 1 (.9%) were labeled high risk. Percentage of more toward red was 7.9% and more toward white was 7.9%. High,.9% Medium/High, 6.1% More Toward Red, 7.9% More Toward White, 7.9% Low, 1.7% Low/Moderate, 38.8% Moderate, 33.6% Valid LSI-R Risk Level 21

22 Section 4 How successful are offenders in completing the HD-DR? 22

23 12% 13.2% 1.4% Missing/Remain in program Other 1% 1.2% Administrative 8% 6% 4% 2% 31.7% 4.4% 46.1% 2.1% Escape Technical New Charge Completed % Release Status Of the offenders who were identified as completing supervision (N = 432), 13.2% (n=57) did not have data reported and is either missing or they remained in program at time of data collection. About half of the offenders 46.1%, (n=199) successfully completed their supervision. About 4 in 1 cases (39.6%, n=171) did not successfully finish the program. The breakdown of reasons why these did not finish the program is as follows: 4.4% received new charges 31.7% committed technical violations 2.1% were labeled as escaped 1.2% were administratively released 1.4% were classified as other. 23

24 Average time spent in HD-DR was calculated for the categories identified previously. Horizontal lines represent the mean length of time on program. The vertical lines represent the range encompassing +/- 1 standard deviation. Those with new charges were under supervision, on average, for 87.8 days (SD = 86.2). Offenders who were terminated from supervision for technical violations, stayed in supervision 93.9 days (SD=63.6). Those in the Other category were on days (SD = 17.2). Offenders who escaped while under supervision were in HD-DR for an average of 48.5 days (SD = 6.6). Those administratively released were on program an average of 86.3 days (SD = 15.7)

25 Section 5 What relationships exist between items 1-4 and program completion? 25

26 Characteristics of offenders who were identified as completing the HD-DR were further examined. This investigation compared characteristics of those who successfully completed their program to those who were terminated for technical violations and those for whom new charges were filed. Characteristics of these offenders are presented below. Some caution is suggested in the interpretation of these findings, as there may be other unmeasured factors present that influence results. In addition, when compared to the larger population of offenders who are and will move though HD-DR, the representativeness of these offenders is not established. All of these offenders were referred by the Department of Correction. As length of time in supervision increased, so did the likelihood of successful completion of supervision (r s (369) =.62, p<.1). The number of prior DOC commitments was not significantly related to successful completion (r s (365) = -.5, ns). The age of an offender was related to successful completion (r s (369) =.15, p=.5). No significant differences were seen in the proportion of offenders successfully completing based upon where they lived when they entered supervision (Cramer s V =.13, ns). Majority race was not associated with successful completion (X 2 (1, 368) = 3.5, ns). Gender was not associated with successful completion (X 2 (1, 368) =.13, ns). Years of education was related to successful completion (r s (349) =.21, p<.1). Marital status was not associated with successful completion (X 2 (1, 368) = 2.7, ns). There was a difference in odds of successful completion of HD-DR supervision for persons having at least a high school education versus those who did not complete school or receive an equivalency diploma (X 2 (1, 365) = 4.43, p=.4). Categorical risk level from the PCL-was not significantly associated with successful completion (X 2 (1, 98) =.11, p=.78). Scores on the V-RAG were not significantly related to successful completion (r s (86) = -.2, ns). Scores on the Hare PCL-R were inversely related to successful completion (r s (122) = -.26, p=.3). Scores on the IRAS were inversely related to successful completion (r s (72) = -.38, p=.1). Scores on the LSI-R were inversely associated with successful completion (r s (212) = -.19, p=.5). 26

27 Section 6 How frequent is recidivism and what form does that recidivism take? 27

28 In order to evaluate recent recidivism outcomes, a sample of offenders was comprised of those individuals alive and completing the 3 year recidivism check during (N = 591). The sample was largely male (78.3%), African American (36.9%) or Caucasian (56.3%), (Hispanic/Latino = 5.6%), averaged 31.9 years of age (SD = 1.4) at intake, and was single (66.8%). On average, this group had.5 prior commitments (SD =.9, Mdn number of priors = ) Offense types at intake included 65.1% Class D Felony, 15.4% Class C Felony, 15.4% Class B Felonies, and.5% Class A Felonies. In addition, 3.2% of these offenders were charged with Class A Misdemeanor and.3% Class B Misdemeanor. PCL-R risk classification - Of those offenders with PCL-R risk scores (39.1%, n=231), 13.4% (n=31) were identified as high risk and 86.6% (n=2) were identified as low risk. These offenders were on program an average of days (Mdn 179.; SD = 114.7; range = 1-833). Just over 3 in 1 (31.8%) of these offenders were rearrested on at least one occasion during the specified recidivism period. Of those completing this 3 year post program recidivism check, most were rearrested once (22.7%). However, 7.3% were arrested twice, 1.4% three times, and.5% were arrested four times. No offender was arrested more than four times. 28

29 st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest 6 month recidivism At six month recidivism check, 12 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony, 3 for a Class C Felony, 2 for a Class B Felony, and for a Class A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 2 offenders were rearrested for Class A Misdemeanor offenses, 9 for Class B Misdemeanors, and 2 for Class C Misdemeanor offenses st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest Note: One individual was arrested a 4th time for an A Felony offense and another individual was arrested for murder. 12 month recidivism 29

30 At 12 month recidivism check (6-12 months post release), 15 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony, for a Class C Felony, 3 for a Class B Felony, and for a Class A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 11 were rearrested for Class A Misdemeanor offenses, 7 for Class B Misdemeanors, and for Class C Misdemeanors st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest 18 month recidivism At 18 month recidivism check (12-18 months post release), 12 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony offense, 6 for a Class C Felony, for a Class B Felony, and for a Class A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 22 were arrested for Class A Misdemeanor offenses, 14 for Class B Misdemeanors, and 1 for Class C Misdemeanors. At 24 month recidivism check (18-24 months post release), 14 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony offense, 1 for a Class C Felony, 1 for a Class B Felony, and for an A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 22 were arrested for a Class A Misdemeanor offense, 1 for Class B Misdemeanors, and 3 for Class C Misdemeanors. 3

31 st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest 24 month recidivism st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest 3 month recidivism At 3 month recidivism check (24-3 months post release), 1 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony, 4 for a Class C Felony, for a Class B Felony, and for a Class A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 19 were rearrested for a Class A Misdemeanor offense, 8 for Class B Misdemeanors, and 2 for Class C Misdemeanors. 31

32 st Arrest 2nd Arrest 3rd Arrest 36 month recidivism At 36 month recidivism check (3-36 months post release), 9 offenders were arrested for a Class D Felony offense, 2 for a Class C Felony, 2 for a Class B Felony, and for a Class A Felony. Of recidivism at the misdemeanor level, 17 were arrested for Class A Misdemeanor offenses, 14 for Class B Misdemeanors, and 1 for C Misdemeanors. 32

33 Section 7 What relationships exist between items 1-4 and recidivism? 33

34 The following summarizes analysis of relationships between recidivism and other variables under investigation. Characteristics of these offenders are presented below. Some caution is suggested in the interpretation of these findings, as there may be other unmeasured factors present that influence results. In addition, when compared to the larger population of offenders who are and will move though the HD-DR, the representativeness of these offenders is not established. There were no statistically significant bivariate relationships between the following variables and recidivism: having an Axis I diagnosis, having an Axis II diagnosis, having a substance use diagnosis, DOC commitments, number of dependent children, education level, Hare PCL-R score, VRAG score, SORAG score, SARA score, LSI-R score, or total days on program. Age was negatively associated with re-arrest (r s (59) = -.16, p<.1), suggesting older age was associated with the reduced likelihood of being re-arrested. Minority race/ethnicity was associated with re-arrest (X 2 (1, 589) = 8.1, p=.5). The odds that an offender of minority ethnicity would be rearrested were 1.7 times higher than for offenders who were of majority ethnicity. Quadrant of residence was associated with re-arrest (Cramer s V=.127, p=.24). Offenders in quadrant 4 had the highest re-arrest rates (38.1% or 86/226), followed by those in quadrant 2 (34.5% or 39/113), quadrant 3 (26.4% or 33/125), and quadrant 1 (24.2% or 3/124). Marital status was associated with re-arrest (X 2 (1, 587) = 5.3, p=.21). Offenders who were single were 1.92 times more likely to be re-arrested than married offenders. 34

Allen County Community Corrections. Modified Therapeutic Community. Report for Calendar Years

Allen County Community Corrections. Modified Therapeutic Community. Report for Calendar Years Allen County Community Corrections Modified Therapeutic Community Report for Calendar Years 2011-2013 Joseph Hansel, Ph.D., Jacqueline Wall, Ph.D., & Aaron Kivisto, Ph.D. Allen County Community Corrections

More information

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS Research and Report Completed on 8/13/02 by Dr. Lois Ventura -1- Introduction -2- Toledo/Lucas County TASC The mission of Toledo/Lucas County Treatment Alternatives

More information

SAQ-Adult Probation III & SAQ-Short Form

SAQ-Adult Probation III & SAQ-Short Form * * * SAQ-Adult Probation III & SAQ-Short Form 2002 RESEARCH STUDY This report summarizes SAQ-Adult Probation III (SAQ-AP III) and SAQ- Short Form test data for 17,254 adult offenders. The SAQ-Adult Probation

More information

SAQ-Short Form Reliability and Validity Study in a Large Sample of Offenders

SAQ-Short Form Reliability and Validity Study in a Large Sample of Offenders SAQ-Short Form Reliability and Validity Study in a Large Sample of Offenders Donald D Davignon, Ph.D. 10-21-02 ABSTRACT The SAQ-Short Form (SAQ-SF) is an adult offender assessment test that accurately

More information

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP) Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP) Presented to: Outagamie County Presented by: Tina L. Freiburger, Ph.D., Alyssa Pfeiffer, M.S., University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee June 23,

More information

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information prepared for: The First Judicial District Court, the Administrative Office

More information

Sexual Adjustment Inventory

Sexual Adjustment Inventory * * * Sexual Adjustment Inventory 2002 Annual Summary Report This report summarizes Sexual Adjustment Inventory (SAI) test data for 4,854 sex offenders. The SAI test data was gathered between January 1,

More information

Domestic Violence Inventory: Annual Summary Report

Domestic Violence Inventory: Annual Summary Report * * * Domestic Violence Inventory: Annual Summary Report Donald D. Davignon, Ph.D. February 15, 2003 Abstract This research study summarizes Domestic Violence Inventory (DVI) test data for 10,933 domestic

More information

Pathways to Crime. Female Offender Experiences of Victimization. JRSA/BJS National Conference, Portland Maine, 10/28/10

Pathways to Crime. Female Offender Experiences of Victimization. JRSA/BJS National Conference, Portland Maine, 10/28/10 Pathways to Crime Female Offender Experiences of Victimization JRSA/BJS National Conference, Portland Maine, 10/28/10 Background The Idaho SAC has been helping the Idaho Department of Corrections in evaluation

More information

Running head: EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO REDUCE RECIDIVISM 1. An Evaluation of Programs Designed to Reduce Recidivism.

Running head: EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO REDUCE RECIDIVISM 1. An Evaluation of Programs Designed to Reduce Recidivism. Running head: EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO REDUCE RECIDIVISM 1 An Evaluation of Programs Designed to Reduce Recidivism Victoria Schuler Lewis-Clark State College JS 499-7501 Spring 2017 EVALUATION

More information

Study of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay

Study of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay Study of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay Releases from the Dutchess County Jail December 2011 - October 2012 November 12, 2013 1 As part of its ongoing commitment to evidence-based criminal

More information

Ramsey County Proxy Tool Norming & Validation Results

Ramsey County Proxy Tool Norming & Validation Results Ramsey County Proxy Tool Norming & Validation Results Tammy Meredith, Ph.D. Applied Research Services, Inc. February 26, 2014 A Ramsey County (St. Paul, Minnesota) work team consisting of the Sheriff,

More information

Women Prisoners and Recidivism Factors Associated with Re-Arrest One Year Post-Release

Women Prisoners and Recidivism Factors Associated with Re-Arrest One Year Post-Release Women Prisoners and Recidivism Factors Associated with Re-Arrest One Year Post-Release Robin E. Bates, Ph.D. Tough sentencing guidelines enacted during the 1980s and early 1990s resulted in record numbers

More information

Office of Research and Strategic Planning

Office of Research and Strategic Planning Office of Research and Strategic Planning Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Center June 2014 State of West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety Division of Justice and Community

More information

DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE AT INTAKE SECTION TWO

DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE AT INTAKE SECTION TWO SECTION TWO DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE AT INTAKE 7 2.1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS Table 2.1 presents demographic descriptive data at intake for those who were included in the follow-up study. Data

More information

Evaluation of the Eleventh Judicial District Court San Juan County Juvenile Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

Evaluation of the Eleventh Judicial District Court San Juan County Juvenile Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information Evaluation of the Eleventh Judicial District Court San Juan County Juvenile Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information Prepared for: The Eleventh Judicial District Court

More information

The New Face of Monroe County Community Supervision

The New Face of Monroe County Community Supervision The New Face of Monroe County Community Supervision Monroe County Council Work Session May 22, 2018 Hon. Mary Ellen Diekhoff, Presiding Judge Monroe Circuit Court Monroe Circuit Court Probation Department

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center April Prepared by: Kristine Denman, Director, NMSAC

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center April Prepared by: Kristine Denman, Director, NMSAC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prison Program Utilization and Recidivism among Female Inmates in New Mexico New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center April 2015 Prepared by: Kristine Denman, Director, NMSAC Key findings:

More information

Bucks County Drug Court Program Application

Bucks County Drug Court Program Application Docket Number(s) Bucks County Drug Court Program Application Please read each question carefully before answering. Failure to complete all required Drug Court forms and questionnaires accurately will delay

More information

DVI Pre-Post: Standardization Study

DVI Pre-Post: Standardization Study DVI Pre-Post: Standardization Study Donald D Davignon, Ph.D. Abstract The validity of the DVI Pre-Post (DVI-PP) was investigated in a sample of 3,250 participants. There were 344 participants who completed

More information

Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs

Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs October 2010 Christine M. Shea Adams, Ph.D. Linda Harrison, M.S.

More information

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT An Overview THE TEAM: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH The Northampton County Drug Court Team consists of: Judge County Division of Drug and Alcohol County Division of Mental

More information

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County Transition from Jail to Community Reentry in Washtenaw County Since 2000 we have averaged 7,918 bookings per year and 3,395 new individuals booked each year. Curtis Center Program Evaluation Group (CC-PEG),

More information

Santa Fe Municipal Court P.O. Box 909 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504

Santa Fe Municipal Court P.O. Box 909 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 Santa Fe Municipal Court P.O. Box 909 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 DVI Pre-Post Shoplifting Inventory Treatment Intervention Inventory June 2005 Behavior Data Systems, Ltd. PO Box 44256 Phoenix, Arizona

More information

Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs

Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs STATEWIDE OBJECTIVE JAIL CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE 1. Purpose: To establish a statewide procedure for the use of the Washington Association of Sheriffs

More information

Statewide Data of the DCJ Juvenile Diversion Program

Statewide Data of the DCJ Juvenile Diversion Program Statewide Data of the DCJ Juvenile Diversion Program 2016-2017 Submitted To the Colorado Division of Criminal Justice August 2017 Statewide Data of the DCJ Juvenile Diversion Program 2016-2017 For more

More information

Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Report

Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Report Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Report Submitted to: Florida Supreme Court - OSCA Office of Court Improvement 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1900 Submitted by: NPC Research Portland,

More information

Shoplifting Inventory: Standardization Study

Shoplifting Inventory: Standardization Study Shoplifting Inventory: Standardization Study Donald D Davignon, Ph.D. 10-2-02 Abstract The Shoplifting Inventory (SI) is an adult shoplifting offender assessment test that accurately measures offender

More information

Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice. Justice Reinvestment Presentation #1 September 12, 2018

Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice. Justice Reinvestment Presentation #1 September 12, 2018 Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice Justice Reinvestment Presentation #1 September 12, 2018 Overview Data Sources NDOC Admissions NDOC Prison Population Female Population Specialty Courts

More information

Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings DRAFT

Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings DRAFT Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings Submitted by Policy Services & Research Data Center Mental Health Law & Policy Florida Mental Health Institute University

More information

Implementing a Risk/Need/Responsivity Framework into an Offender Management System. April 5, 2017

Implementing a Risk/Need/Responsivity Framework into an Offender Management System. April 5, 2017 Implementing a Risk/Need/Responsivity Framework into an Offender Management System Joanna Champney, M.A. Chief, Planning & Research Samantha Zulkowski, M.S. Planner & Researcher April 5, 2017 Overview

More information

SAQ-Adult Probation III: Normative Study

SAQ-Adult Probation III: Normative Study * * * SAQ-Adult Probation III: Normative Study November 16, 2002 ABSTRACT The SAQ-Adult Probation III (SAQ-AP III) is an adult offender assessment test that accurately measures offender risk of violence

More information

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator Eighth Judicial District Court Specialty Courts Elizabeth Gonzalez Chief Judge DeNeese Parker Specialty Court Administrator Eighth Judicial District Specialty Court Programs Serving 1200 1500 Clark County

More information

Implications of contemporary research findings on future policy & practice

Implications of contemporary research findings on future policy & practice Madeline Mimi Carter Principal, Center for Effective Public Policy Silver Spring, MD 301-589-9383; cartermm@cepp.com Implications of contemporary research findings on future policy & practice 1. Define

More information

Spokane District/Municipal Mental Health Court

Spokane District/Municipal Mental Health Court Spokane District/Municipal Mental Health Court Sales Tax Initiative The Spokane County Commissioners requested a vote of the public to fund SSB 5763 which would fund therapeutic courts. The citizens voted

More information

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989 Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989 The Drug Court model expanded across the country in the 1990 s and

More information

PREVALANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE REGIONAL CORERCTIONAL CENTER

PREVALANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE REGIONAL CORERCTIONAL CENTER PREVALANCE OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE REGIONAL CORERCTIONAL CENTER Survey Results April Prepared for: Jackson County Mental Health Fund Mental Health Court Commission Funded by: Jackson County Community

More information

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation Department of Court Services THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME Background information Drug Courts were created first in the

More information

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 Agenda 2 Dauphin County Demographics History of MH and Forensic Efforts in Dauphin County SAMHSA Jail

More information

An Examination of the Outcomes of Various Components of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence by Male Offenders

An Examination of the Outcomes of Various Components of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence by Male Offenders J Fam Viol (2007) 22:353 366 DOI 10.1007/s10896-007-9086-y ORIGINAL ARTICLE An Examination of the Outcomes of Various Components of a Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence by Male Offenders

More information

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520)

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520) 3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ 85716 Phone (520) 319-1109 Fax (520)319-7013 Exodus Community Services Inc. exists for the sole purpose of providing men and women in recovery from addiction with safe,

More information

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS MINNESOTA COURTS: A SUMMARY OF Minnesota Courts EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE COURT PROGRAMS courts are criminal justice programs that bring together drug and alcohol treatment and the criminal justice system

More information

Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders

Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders Overview Animal Abuse and Antisocial Behavior Holding Animal Abusers Accountable and Reducing Recidivism: Challenges and Opportunities Diversion Options

More information

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 1 Project Overview Grant from Bureau of Justice Assistance Contract with the National Center for State Courts to: Develop performance

More information

North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Community Corrections Pre-sentence Investigation Report. Defendant's Identification

North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Community Corrections Pre-sentence Investigation Report. Defendant's Identification North Carolina Department of Correction Division of Community Corrections Pre-sentence Investigation Report Requested by: Date Requested: Prepared by: Date Prepared: Defendant's Identification Names: Date

More information

Berks County Treatment Courts

Berks County Treatment Courts Berks County Treatment Courts Presented by Judge Peter W. Schmehl Brendan L. Harker, Probation Officer About Berks County 44 Townships, 30 Boroughs, 1 City Covers 865 Square Miles 375,000 residents 434

More information

Transitional, Intergenerational Group Residence Application. Texas ID# Primary Language: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Phone-home ( ) Phone-work ( )

Transitional, Intergenerational Group Residence Application. Texas ID# Primary Language: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Phone-home ( ) Phone-work ( ) PERSONAL/FAMILY INFORMATION Name Date Date of Birth / / SS # Gender Texas ID# Primary Language: Marital Status: Single Divorced Common Law Living Together Married & living with Spouse not living with Spouse

More information

elements of change Juveniles

elements of change Juveniles COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND STATISTICS OCTOBER 1998 elements of change highlighting trends and issues in the criminal justice system VOL. 3

More information

Prison Population Reduction Strategies Through the Use of Offender Assessment: A Path Toward Enhanced Public Safety

Prison Population Reduction Strategies Through the Use of Offender Assessment: A Path Toward Enhanced Public Safety Prison Population Reduction Strategies Through the Use of Offender Assessment: A Path Toward Enhanced Public Safety Governor s Commission on Prison Overcrowding Spring 2009 Stephen M. Haas, Director Criminal

More information

Community-based sanctions

Community-based sanctions Community-based sanctions... community-based sanctions used as alternatives to incarceration are a good investment in public safety. Compared with incarceration, they do not result in higher rates of criminal

More information

Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment

Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment Criminal risk assessment estimates an individual s likelihood of repeat criminal behavior and classifies offenders based on their relative risk of such behavior whereas

More information

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System Hillsborough County Strategic Planning Department & Court Administration for the 13 th Judicial Circuit Tampa,

More information

Findings from the NIJ Tribal Wellness Court Study: 68 Key Component #8

Findings from the NIJ Tribal Wellness Court Study: 68 Key Component #8 Overview The sections of the Policies and Procedures Manual (P&PM) governing data tracking and evaluation are implicated by Key Component 8 - Monitoring and Evaluation. Strong Healing to Wellness Courts

More information

Policy and interventions for adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement

Policy and interventions for adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement Policy and interventions for adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement Allison G. Robertson, PhD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral

More information

On an average day in , up to 4.4% of state

On an average day in , up to 4.4% of state U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report OCTOBER 2015 NCJ 249209 Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011 12 Allen J. Beck, Ph.D.,

More information

Level of Service Inventory-Revised

Level of Service Inventory-Revised Level of Service Inventory-Revised COUNCIL OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT JUDGES LASHEIKA KASSA, TREATMENT SUPPORT FIDELITY SPECIALIST LSI-R Overview 1. Description of LSI-R 2. Criminogenic Needs (R-N-R) 3. LSI-R

More information

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS:

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS: PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS: THE UP & OUT PROGRAM Presented by Amy Woerner, LMSW Up & Out Social Worker Bronx Community Solutions WHAT THIS SESSION IS EXPLANATION OF THE GAP IN INTERVENTIONS OUR

More information

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program Cynthia A. Boganowski The incarceration of people with serious mental illness is of growing interest and concern nationally. Because jails and prisons are

More information

AGING OUT IN PRISON Age Distribution of the Colorado Prison System

AGING OUT IN PRISON Age Distribution of the Colorado Prison System AGING OUT IN PRISON Age Distribution of the Colorado Prison System March 11, 2011 For discussion by the Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice 1 Elderly Defined Many state correctional systems

More information

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS COMMUNITY SUPERVISION AND TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS Tracy Crocker, Probation and Parole Officer, District 12 (Farmington) Kay Crockett, MSW, LCSW, Treatment Compliance Specialist John Mosley,

More information

Dodge-Fillmore-Olmsted Methamphetamine Project. July 2008-June 2010 evaluation report

Dodge-Fillmore-Olmsted Methamphetamine Project. July 2008-June 2010 evaluation report Dodge-Fillmore-Olmsted Methamphetamine Project July 2008-June 2010 evaluation report D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 0 Dodge-Fillmore-Olmsted Methamphetamine Project July 2008-June 2010 evaluation report December

More information

Adult Substance Use and Driving Survey-Revised (ASUDS-R) Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity

Adult Substance Use and Driving Survey-Revised (ASUDS-R) Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity T2007 Seattle, Washington Adult Substance Use and Driving Survey-Revised (ASUDS-R) Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity Kenneth W. Wanberg¹ and David S. Timken² ¹Center for Addictions Research

More information

Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings. Final

Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings. Final Report of Pinellas Data Collaborative CJIS System Change Over Time 2007 Findings Submitted by Policy Services & Research Data Center Mental Health Law & Policy Florida Mental Health Institute University

More information

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Alternative Tracks in Adult Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy National Association of Drug Court Professionals Previous Webinar Drug courts reduce crime approximately

More information

Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorders among Juvenile Detainees in Maricopa County

Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorders among Juvenile Detainees in Maricopa County Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorders among Juvenile Detainees in Maricopa County 2009 AARIN Symposium David E. Choate AARIN Definitions of Co-Occurring Disorders Co-Occurring Disorders:

More information

Sexual Adjustment Inventory: Sex Offender Assessment

Sexual Adjustment Inventory: Sex Offender Assessment * * * Sexual Adjustment Inventory: Sex Offender Assessment A Large Sample (N=3,616) Research Study May 22, 2002 Abstract The validity of the Sexual Adjustment Inventory (SAI) was investigated in a sample

More information

Evaluation of Santa Fe s LEAD Program: Criminal Justice Outcomes

Evaluation of Santa Fe s LEAD Program: Criminal Justice Outcomes In partnership with the New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center and Pivot Evaluation Evaluation of Santa Fe s LEAD Program: Criminal Justice Outcomes Prepared by: Jenna Dole, New Mexico Statistical Analysis

More information

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM. State Legislative Summary SCRAM CAM and 24/7 Sobriety Programs 2015 Legislation Arkansas SB472: Known as the Criminal Justice Reform Act of 2015 this bill implements measures designed to enhance public

More information

National Findings on Mental Illness and Drug Use by Prisoners and Jail Inmates. Thursday, August 17

National Findings on Mental Illness and Drug Use by Prisoners and Jail Inmates. Thursday, August 17 National Findings on Mental Illness and Drug Use by Prisoners and Jail Inmates Thursday, August 17 Welcome and Introductions Jennifer Bronson, Ph.D., Bureau of Justice Statistics Statistician Bonnie Sultan,

More information

Recognising Dangerousness Thames Valley Partnership.

Recognising Dangerousness Thames Valley Partnership. Recognising Dangerousness Thames Valley Partnership. Bisham Abbey. October 2007. Richard C Beckett. Consultant Clinical Forensic Psychologist. Oxford Forensic Mental Health Service and University of Birmingham.

More information

Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket Preliminary Outcome Evaluation. Final Report. September 2017 (Revised December 2017)

Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket Preliminary Outcome Evaluation. Final Report. September 2017 (Revised December 2017) Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket Preliminary Outcome Evaluation and Benefit Cost Analysis Final Report September 2017 (Revised December 2017) SUBMITTED TO: Kim Owens, Program Manager Court Administrator

More information

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT Ten Key Components of Veterans Treatment Court Integrate alcohol, drug treatment, mental health treatment, medical services with justice system case processing.

More information

2016 Annual Meeting Conference

2016 Annual Meeting Conference 2016 Annual Meeting Conference Judges Track #2 Grand Ballroom A Evolving Trends in Iowa s Correctional Practices 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Presented by Beth Skinner, Ph.D., Statewide Recidivism Reduction Coordinator,

More information

New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center

New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center Correlates of Substance Use Preferences and Prison Revocations Prepared by: Kristine Denman Drew Medaris Research assistance: Zane Beal Veronica Carrion Jenna Dole

More information

Department of Public Safety Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice

Department of Public Safety Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice Department of Public Safety Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice Task Force on Sentencing Reforms for Opioid Drug Convictions March 6, 2018 1 Missions The NC Department of Public Safety works

More information

STATIC 99R and Community Notification

STATIC 99R and Community Notification STATIC 99R and Community Notification RCW and Risk Assessments for Community Notification RCW 72.09.345: Established the End of Sentence Review Committee (ESRC), where sex offenders releasing from a Department

More information

DOLLARS AND SENSE: THE COST OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TO MISSOURI SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Alcohol and other drug abuse is ranked the most costly health care issue in the United States. Substance abuse and addiction

More information

Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention. NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019

Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention. NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019 Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019 The jail population fell below 8,000 for the first time since 1980 New York City has the lowest rate of incarceration

More information

epic.org EPIC WI-FOIA Production epic.org/algorithmic-transparency/crim-justice/

epic.org EPIC WI-FOIA Production epic.org/algorithmic-transparency/crim-justice/ COMPAS Validation Study: First Annual Report December 31, 2007 Principal Investigators David Farabee, Ph.D. (UCLA) Sheldon Zhang, Ph.D. (SDSU) Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior University

More information

Unit 2: The Risk and Needs Principles

Unit 2: The Risk and Needs Principles Unit 2: The Risk and Needs Principles Principles of EBP 1. Risk Principle Who 2. Needs Principle What 3. Treatment & Responsivity Principles What Works How % Reduced Recidivism Impact of Adhering to Core

More information

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming Oriana House, Inc. Committed to providing programming that changes lives and contributes to safer communities. Services include: Substance Abuse Community Corrections Reentry Services Headquartered in

More information

TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY

TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY J&PS-03-05 February 2001 Cover TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY Revised March 31 2010 J&PS-03-05 February 2001 Table of Contents 1.0 PREAMBLE...

More information

A Dose of Evaluation:

A Dose of Evaluation: A Dose of Evaluation: Using Results of Minnesota's Statewide Drug Court Evaluation to Understand Differences in Jail, Prison, and Recidivism 2013 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Conference

More information

Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970

Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970 Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970 to present increased sevenfold. U.S. has less than

More information

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia Jason Metzger, Community Corrections Program Specialist The statewide planning agency dedicated to the

More information

Mark A. Greenwald Director of Research and Data Integrity. Laura Moneyham Assistant Secretary for Residential Services 8/21/2015 1

Mark A. Greenwald Director of Research and Data Integrity. Laura Moneyham Assistant Secretary for Residential Services 8/21/2015 1 Mark A. Greenwald Director of Research and Data Integrity Laura Moneyham Assistant Secretary for Residential Services 8/21/2015 1 Discussion Topics Risk Assessment Importance of Service Matching The Disposition

More information

Greg's Place - Application

Greg's Place - Application Greg's Place - Application Date Name SS# DOB Age # Email Release / Out Date Names of next of Kin with phone numbers (Parents, Adult children, close friends) (In case of emergency) You must provide at least

More information

Adult Drug Courts All Rise

Adult Drug Courts All Rise Adult Drug Courts All Rise Giving hope and support to those that the traditional justice system would deem hopeless NADCP Lily Gleicher History of Drug Courts First drug court was started in 1989 in Dade

More information

Are Drug Treatment Programs in Prison Effective in Reducing Recidivism Rates?

Are Drug Treatment Programs in Prison Effective in Reducing Recidivism Rates? Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU Academic Festival Apr 20th, 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM Are Drug Treatment Programs in Prison Effective in Reducing Recidivism Rates? Kallysta Tanguay Sacred Heart University

More information

Criminal Justice Research Report

Criminal Justice Research Report Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance Criminal Justice Research Report Andrew M. Cuomo Governor Michael C. Green September 2012 Executive Deputy Commissioner

More information

Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections

Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections Date: October 12, 2011 To: Subject: From: Delaware Justice Reinvestment Task Force Risk and Needs Assessments Vera Institute of Justice, Center on Sentencing and Corrections In response to the requests

More information

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019 Page 1 of 17 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019 DEPARTMENT MISSION Programs within Court Diversion share a common goal of diverting offenders out of the

More information

The Public Safety Coordinating Council s. Criminal Justice System Data Book January 2014

The Public Safety Coordinating Council s. Criminal Justice System Data Book January 2014 PSCC OFFICERS CHAIR, TIM LAUE Citizen Member VICE CHAIR, PAUL SOLOMON Citizen Member VOTING MEMBERS DOUGLAS BAKKE Citizen Member STEPHEN DAVIS Citizen Member DONOVAN DUMIRE Community Corrections Manager

More information

The Influence of Mental Health Disorders on Education and Employment Outcomes For Serious Adolescent Offenders Transitioning to Adulthood

The Influence of Mental Health Disorders on Education and Employment Outcomes For Serious Adolescent Offenders Transitioning to Adulthood The Influence of Mental Health Disorders on Education and Employment Outcomes For Serious Adolescent Offenders Transitioning to Adulthood Carol A. Schubert Edward P. Mulvey University of Pittsburgh School

More information

Evaluating the Success of Written Mitigation in Reducing Prison Sentences and Achieving Alternatives to Incarceration for Parole Violations

Evaluating the Success of Written Mitigation in Reducing Prison Sentences and Achieving Alternatives to Incarceration for Parole Violations Evaluating the Success of Written Mitigation in Reducing Prison Sentences and Achieving Alternatives to Incarceration for Parole Violations Nnenna Onyema, Jaime Buseman, and Carrie Maldovan It is estimated

More information

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Imperial County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Imperial County

More information

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Orange County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Orange County 21 TABLE

More information

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Butte County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Butte County 21 TABLE

More information

Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics

Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics 7/1/09 thru 6/30/10 7/1/10 thru 6/30/11 Notes/Questions Total Traffic Collisions 308 276 Total DUI Collisions 40 (13.0%)

More information